all I say to those who think it so easy to go with out it look at your life with your parents or grandparents without what they have look at them who will they live with? will you pay a nursing home will you pay food and medical bills for them? so you expect your kids or grand kids to do that for you? the cost is much higher than tax dollars . yes we can save but if a flood happened or you need a ramp on your home for your child or school funds or any disaster that savings is gone so quick.
8 Consecutive UP months for the stock market without a meaningful correction. Another huge bubble is forming and the Fed again fails to respond which shows nothing ever is or has been learned by these guys. This is pre-bubble burst euphoria again where risk taking is going to dangerously absurd levels. It seems this unstoppable momentum means that leverage is once again the rule of the day. If this less than good news can't contain this market to trend sideways rather than up...big ugly bust.
This is the 18th time out of the past 20 weeks that the first trading day of the week was up. That is clearly bizarre as the first trading day of the week has accounted for 80 percent of all the price appreciation in the stock market since March 2009
America is partly to blame for the corruption. US$ and US influence is used to bribe then assassinate any African politician trying to stop abuse and exploitation of people for oil, gold or diamonds.
Other countries can have universal healthcare because they don't spend so much money on their military budget. The US has to reign in its' military spending so it can afford the social spending. The US doesn't really need 11 aircraft carriers, they cost billions to make and billions to run, get rid of half of them straight away.
What about the many bases it has over the world? There are 47000 people in the bases in Japan and 62000 in bases in Germany. What threat are these countries to the US?
You are only telling half the story. Excessive tax rates and the concurrent wealth redistribution that such a system entails is what funds those misnamed Universal Care systems. How just is it to take the decision away from a man or woman on how much of their earnings they are allowed to keep?
How just is it to charge someone for a Care system they neither want or need? Why would you punish the healthy?
Charity does NOT WORK for healthcare. Taxation does. I pay 11% annual income tax and 13% sales tax (7% and 6% split: until harmonization is in, some times one or the other tax does not apply to purchases; food is not taxed by either). What do YOU pay in taxes for NO HEALTH CARE? Think about that.
If the only way a man can be rich is to ensure another is sick and dies that is EVIL and WE THE PEOPLE SPEAK TO THAT POWER: KILL IT NOW. Kill it dead.
At the turn of the century, the 20th century (1900), it worked fine. Of course at that time Health Care was concerned with maintaining health and remedying illness.
Your 2nd q: Now think about what your tax rate will look like when DC tries to fund a Universal Care system that provides incentives for individuals to maintain an insurance plan only when ill. You think Health Care is expensive now, you ain't seen nothing yet.
I live it. Come live where I do and watch and see. Donations are nice but taxation pays the bills. If healthcare was 100% personally funded then only the super-rich would have doctors and most other people would be too sick to work. I live in Canada. It's -10 C to -30 C in the warm parts of winter. -40 C = -40 F. In Saskatchewan it can hit -60 C in the wind chill. No doctor = suicide.
like I said: my tax rate is 11% income tax to the Canadian Federal Government / CRA (revenue agency) and 13% is the rest combined sales tax. I think I wrote the split wrong last time, sorry. 8% goods+services (federal) sales tax was dropped to 6% as a campaign promise; the rest is Ontario provincial (sales tax).
You claim to live in a nation rife with government interference with the provision of health care, then whine about how poorly it serves those it is claimed to be in service of. That is my point. And if you cut your sales tax rate in half it would be at the level I currently pay (~8% on most consumer good) and with that savings alone you could open a savings account to cover health expenses beyond day to day need. You are you're own enemy w/analysis you submit
If you government didn't coerce the Health Care industry into monopoly market practices then those providers would be forced by natural market conditions to compete, including on price, for the privilege of you choosing them to be allowed to service you. Prices would accordingly fall to an affordable level.
You've been sold a bill of goods called Socialism. Why do you not defend your own best interests against those who would take from you what is not theirs to take?
it's affordable to all of us. You've been duped. Capitalism drives up prices, drives down quality. The companies can still compete against each other for quality and contracts. The tax dollars fund it but they do not RUN the companies. WE THE PEOPLE all pay from our taxes and WE DO NOT STARVE FOR IT. Your people do starve for your capitalistic choice.
Not ONE CANADIAN I HAVE EVER SPOKEN TO IN MY LIFE, INCLUDING THOSE WHO ARE RICH are saying we should privatize health care. When I was getting my leg operated on, I shared a room with a man who has built yachts and certainly seems to be quite rich describing his home. He too is PROUD of our health care system. He was in for a double bypass.
I'm seeing consumer rates of 12 to 20% on the bills. I'm seeing the bills with tax rates people pay all across America from my job. I run credit on people. I see those too as needed to approve or not approve the application as per company policies. My tax rate actually is half what most Americans pay. I've seen a few come up but I don't recall which states. Iowa? Kansas? Can't recall, and of course it's not legal or right for me to write it down for later use.
I've been busying watching prices, working, and finding where more fraud is in the vast economy labyrinth. Turns out using the Austrian model of why capitalism does work does in fact help spot fraud very quickly. I'm plotting it short term and long term and matching it to news articles.
Sounds good. Must be a semantics disagreement over the meaning and use of the term *capital* and *capitalism*
What is practised in the US in many industries is not capitalism. It is an economics that makes use of capital but precludes private use and direction of privately held capital. Not that "good" cannot be done by government but that by allowing government to confiscate capital it removes the possibility that greater good can be done. Private interest is motivated to do good, gov is not.
I suppose that's possible. I re-use a statement I read once that you can't have capitalism without capital, something like that, and if you're living in debt then technically your net capital is below 0.
So let's say we had a system, labelled it capitalism, and it was based around savings, production, never consuming more than you produced and investing for returns, accepting risk, and certainly never tried to borrow more than could exist ever, we might have a decent capitalist system. In its most honest and efficient form I can spot only a few bad spots with "capitalism". Making something become scarce that should not be, or the inverse, for example.
e.g. clean water, or abundant food. We can have both at very low cost, and yet, with "capitalism" (or some of it?) we end up ruining both, only to assign higher value to what's left of it. Labour: increasing workers (population) also decreases wages if the net amount of work required everywhere doesn't also increase.
If government or an agency of it, or employed by it, wanted to do good for a capitalist economy that already had minimal fraud and inefficiency, it would simply advise everyone what changes could be made so everyone is aware, and let them do it (or not: choice = freedom). Sound good so far?
as for "manufacturing poverty", a statement I stand by, it does actually need clarifying. If what is (was) abundant (food, clean water, safe shelter) does not get ruined, then "poverty" is only relative, rather than absolute. Absolute poverty sends people to illness and death. Relative poverty that is "better" simply leaves some without the "better" or "best" but is no danger. One is a much better situation than the other.
What is your point? Seems like you want take this discussion and turn it into "Let's pretend" so you can continue to bad mouth Capitalism w/o regret or facing opposing views. You should have quit when you for a moment got your head above water.
Sounds like you have rambling and intelligence mixed. You're the idiot rambler.
Have a nice day scum bag. Capitalism can't win. The poverty produced always leads to social uprising and civil war. HAVE IT YOUR WAY. You know what's coming.
for every wealthy person another 10 must starve. That's poverty. Wealth accumulation is a net-theft causing homelessness, poverty and you know what? The rest of the world's already caught on. That's why the capitalists are in so much trouble now. This is reality. No dreams. Wake up little sheeple, wake up.
Are you utterly clueless when it comes to matters of accumulation of wealth or are you a bald faced liar?
Your claim implies that those who accumulate wealth do so by taking from the impoverished. An obvious contradiction in terms. Of course it is this contradiction remaining unseen upon which you wish to remedy that impoverished state. Your real motive is to steal from the wealthy and redistribute to others, including the poor, all the while claiming to be undoing some imaginary injustice.
no, no, no. You do not understand. I am STATING, not implying. And it is taking from people who are NOT YET impoverished to MAKE THEM BECOME impoverished. Case in point: coal mining, west virginia, ripping mountain peaks apart and shooting at the complainers. Who are unable to protect their private land from being poisoned by these sometimes illegal operations by mining companies. This leads to economic expansion, accumulated wealth, and electricity generation from burning that coal.
I don't wish to "remedy" the recently impoverished. I seek, most of all, to ensure those who are not yet impoverished will not be. I don't know how you can undo the total starvation and/or poisoning of a community. The damage to one's home, land, garden, farm, air, water ... it's irreversible, isn't it? Tends to be. My motive is to ensure the stealing stops because there is so much. Capitalism as the word knows it.
I was looking at the comments on silverfuturist's videos and a fairly recent one actually shows a model of capitalism I don't think anyone can really argue with. The Amish. I have to say, I'm impressed. And they're religious and I'm an atheist and I'm still very, very impressed. All this time it never really came to mind, there's capitalism without systemic theft, fraud, inflation, killing ... but it's such a small example. THEY should be considered economic geniuses.
and of course when I say "sometimes illegal" operations of dumping all the mining waste into the valleys with the rivers feeding the water supply to those who are never compensated (there's that capitalism for ya) by the coal miners, what I'm "implying" is that law enforcement is "for sale" (capitali$m!) to ensure those laws are not enforced.
fofoa blogspot com / 2010 / 02 / greece-is-word . html
I know you seem not to understand how capitalism is a machine that manufactures poverty but this will help explain. There are pictures for numerically deficient readers.
@maskedphrogg charity failed for health care at the turn of the century. Snake oil all day every day. My tax rate looks AWESOME in CANADA with REAL HEALTH CARE, not HEALTH INSURANCE. I think my health care is HIGHLY AFFORDABLE and HIGHLY EFFECTIVE. It's the most beautiful thing I've ever seen and I LOVE IT. I'm PROUD to pay taxes for it because it's COST EFFECTIVE. Much better than any capitalism could DREAM of being.
That statement "How just is it to charge someone for a Care system they neither want or need" is quite correct, just substitute "Care" for 'military'. More Americans die or are bankrupted from lack of healthcare and the excessive cost of healthcare. Have a look at the other nations that have 'universal care'(actually every developed nation has it except the US) and you will see that the other nations think that it can work well. Many people try and label it "Socialised medicine" to denigrate it.
Still only telling half the story. Conveniently you leave out the folks who die from the application of contemporary Health Care. You also disregard the evidence that Care cost is so high as a direct result of government interference in the Care provision market.
Calling it *socialized medicine* casts a spotlight on how costs are passed on to those who don't participate but are required to under force of Law. It is not an emotional conclusion. Costs will be subsidized by socializing them.
More Americans die or are bankrupted from lack of healthcare and the excessive cost of healthcare
More Americans die or are bankrupted than for what other reason or reasons?
If you have a statement to make then please make it.
Then justify holding up an industry that kills over 100k every year by way of appropriately administered pharmaceuticals in appropriate dosages. I fear your priorities are not ordered well.
@maskedphrogg Just look up the cost per person for healthcare in the US and have a look at the cost per person in Australia or Canada (the US spends nearly double). Then have a look at the life expectancy for those same countries (The US is several years lower). The US has the 'freedom' to spend more yet live less, does that make sense? Health care is so much better for the people in the countries that have universal coverage that it would be ignorant to think that the current US system is best.
What the hell does cost/person have to do with paying for the Health Care of others? Of course you reduce your own expense by passing it on to others.
Still trying to sidetrack debate with misleading feel-good proclamations.
Then you think your stealthy by stealing one of my points. What *do* we get for overpriced medicine that is propped up by Government interference? I think you're on to something! Lower length of life expectancy and higher rates of illness and other maladies.
The cost/person has EVERYTHING to do with it. ALWAYS WILL. That's why you Americans "don't get it". The only right way to have healthcare is if those who can't pay, are paid for, so later on they can work and be healthy and do the same for others. Everything else is a disaster. And immoral.
Socialism is good for everyone, capitalism as practiced in America is pure evil, so go FUCK YOURSELF, MUSSOLINI.
Maybe you're offended by fags ; I'm not ; but everyone should be offended by FASCISTS.
I pay so little for healthcare and it's always there. You pay so much and you can get CUT RIGHT OFF AT ANY TIME. NO RECOURSE. Or none available to start with - ineligibility. NO ONE in Canada is INELIGIBLE for health care. NO ONE.
Go f** ... no... go STARVE yourself. I know YOU WILL. I won't!
the only reason American taxation leads to overspending is because your ability to detect and remove fraud is about 0%. Now it doesn't matter what you do or don't pay in taxes, you have no options that have no corruption. Your system is falling apart.
@maskedphrogg Of course cost/person is the issue because it is the system that is being discussed, not an individual person basis. You can't fix the whole system if everybody has different ideas what it will be. Remember that America doesn't have universal healthcare but does have the highest costs for the average American to access the healthcare system yet the average American is living less than the average person in Australia, Canada etc.
Finally you reveal your true colors. Damn the people, Full Speed Ahead!
You have no qualms in spending other people's money. How noble of you.
By justifying per person each person has no equity in your eyes. After all, you know better than each person what is good for them.
I think you have China syndrome. The State already has such tyrannical authority over individual earnings in China. Tell us again how well that system is working.
@maskedphrogg It seems that you think the current system is the best in the world so there is no need to fix it. Why don't the numbers show that the current system is the best? Because it isn't and needs to be fixed. As for the China comparison, you are just trying to confuse the argument as it isn't a developed nation and it is communist. My comparison nations are developed and democratic so are much more similar to the US than China. Fix the system or more Americans will die needlessly.
cost per person is critically important ; paying for others is never permanent. Those who are paid for will work due to being healthy and will pay in themselves LATER. That's why it works. It always works. Always will. This isn't "feel good" this is "very seldom feel so sick you can't work" and pay those taxes to support everything, and look - it's COLD in Canada and still, we're not sidelined out of work with the flu or colds or absurdity. We know work pays bills and...
... taxed income and purchases pays for healthcare, for roads, for everything we all need. Being socialist is GOOD. Being capitalist is absurd. Just imagine if everyone used roads but only some people paid for them; just imagine if no one paid for them and decided that was OK and further banned public use. We'd have fortresses, villages of them, tribes, no cities, no nation. It's idiotic.
Military service is not voluntary, it is a responsibility to ensure other rights are guarded. Therefor everyone in the domain protected is responsible for the costs of maintaining those forces if not participating by joining those forces. Of course it's socialized, everyone receives the same benefit.
Geez, do you proponents of silly ever tire of creating lies and re-writing history to support your irrational conclusions?
how is it you ignore having a socialized-taxation for military and police that act like military, in a way that's millions of times over-kill to what's useful to your nation? And not spend similar money or more (in balance) on healthcare? Healthcare cost is LOWER with my government intervention because there's no incentive to jack up the costs for nothing (profit = evil).
Hahahaha... can't defend stealing from your neighbors to support your own ill prepared and maintained health so now you try to derail the debate and turn to some other issue that's hardly even tangential.
You just dumped what integrity we had yet to see into the toilet.
C'mon back when you can defend your position on it's own merits and not the lack of merit of an entirely different debate.
And not lie about gov subsidies inherent in the Canadian health care industry.
We are not citizens of our United State! we are debt slaves. Our Fed Gov. went BANKRUPT in 1933! we our tax slaves to rome (foreign masters) of us. Your SS# is proof! Vision victory should tell people our history, and how this works!
Ask the bailout crowd weather governments work. Ask the subsidized farmers if gvt works, ask GM bond holders if it works, ask Fanny en Freddy if it works, ask the military industrial complex if gvt works, ask the private jails if it works.
I just have a bit of a problem with people who say government does not work.
They take halve my income and probably more and I can not do a thing about it. Works pretty damn good.
CNBC and NBC are based in Manhattan in NY. I really do not think these folks get outside the confines of the island of Manhattan and see what is really going on.
By the time I retire, steak will be replaced by Monsanto beef biscuit.
I can't simply post - so I am only using this esponse to post originally. vision - you aren't doing anyone any good with your videos. What is your point? Seriously. Why tell everyone that all is bad, cost more, and more taxes. What are WE supposed to do to help ourselves? Any advise that is REAL would be nice. Otherwise, enjoy your 15 min's of fame as Warholl said.
@BNSFrailfan the dollar is getting better. The dollar hit a low in november and has been going up since. Its now at 77.323 and it was at 74.17. Just hang in there, its getting better slowly.
Daniel, if they start messing with Social Security, I think the "Grey Panthers" and the AARP might be two of the few organizations left in the USA who are actually capable of organization, and organized resistance.
@visionvictory Thanks for the reply... I did'nt think you were heading that way, but I had to say somthing... Love your videos, and hope to start making my own in the near furure... Keep up the good work!
Here in PR, a US territory, the governor actually just recently lowered commercial and personal taxes significantly in order to stimulate the economy. When do you think they'll raise taxes?
parsnip economics 101 moddies projects cumulative losses of residential mortgage backed securities by year of issue ... 2005 ....14 % 2006.....29 % 2007.....35 % this could total about ..580 bil or more ... take care guys
It's always the government's fault, huh Daniel? It couldn't possibly be the greedy corporations, right? It's funny how you never acknowledge the horrible business decisions of the Baby Boomer generation. Worst generation this country has ever seen.
@nameofthepen - Good quote. The suggested vid may help people to understand how ALL govments think.
I think when asked what he thought of western civilisaion, Ghandi replied "Yes. I think that would be a good idea" I'm sure you know the quote, but i thought it was pretty witty.
Most people still think of the west as being "civilised", but if they are honest and look closer, it is possible to see how it really is.
All this govm't and civilised stuff is just an illusion.
@outofdebt4ever I found a video about the dewpointe water filtration / extraction, the guy runs it off an inverter using propane tanks. They make electricity for the machine; various machines; it needs 700 W power. Yamaha inverter. There's a plan Z
@outofdebt4ever also google "teg power brick" or youtube search it, it lets you burn wood to get heat, the heat differential creates electricity. youtube search 'hot stuff' from engineer775
My wife and I went out today and did a little survival bulk shopping today. Whoa! We noted a big jump in prices at the food stores. Also noted some pretty outrageous variances in prices from store to store on same item purchases. Buckle in folks, I think we are rounding turn three and there's not much time left for a pit stop!
sugar just hit a 30 year high in price due to bad weather for sugar cane harvesting. As you may guess, almost anything you eat contains sugar, certainly all baked goods. REAL food inflation in Canada is something like 8% to 15%. Don't know about you guys but I am guessing it will be worse.
Yeah, they are starting to admit it. After all, they don't want the American people to be able to say that they weren't warned or were lied to. The fact that they didn't warn us and lied to us all the way up to the end really doesn't matter huh?
Some reason you don't want this discussion to continue in public?
EntouchNetwork wrote:
--
unfortunately you only hear what is going on in your mind...and some of the apparent limited belief systems you have....there would be much more of a different consciousness given there was a 'council' of some sort...but going there in conversation given your comments...sadly would be a waste of time.
--
Now tell us how that differs from Soviet style top down governance? Your dream is a nightmare.
That is why you tried to take a public discussion private? Makes no sense to me. But neither does your suggestion of using fantasy as a vector for change in behaviour of malicious agents.
You can keep your nightmare vision of Soviet style Politburos to yourself too. Is it so hard for you to learn from the examples set by others?
maybe a benevolent planner to set things right then let everyone else keep it going. Pretty much that's all that ever works. We call it innovation and invention.
Design and implementation are two wholly separate processes. Design provides ideas, implementing those ideas under a regime of forced change does not ensure benevolence. It gives faux justification for the forced nature of the change.
Lenin, Stalin, Mussolini ... it's been tried, and failed.
MSM says that a dollar crisis looms.?... heck, i remember a "study" that revealed that if there are more than one teenager in a car, they are more likely to speed etc...
as my wife will say...they have a profound understanding of the obvious...
crisis? what crisis....i just read that after "tough" negotiations the unions (also govt employees) will not have pay any taxes on their top of the line health care....
falling falling and soon there will be no legitimacy at all
Good one Daniel, It's nice to know that the main st media is right on top of things. Next they will be reporting about the actual dollar collapse right after it happens, and what a shock that it happened. They will say that there was know way that anybody could have seen it coming. And you know the fed will say that they did evrything they could to prevent it.
Historically only commodity backed money has demonstrated the ability to retain value. Gold and Silver have been preferred commodities for their transportability and divisibility. iow you can take them w/you readily and easily cut up samples of them for varying denominations of value.
Paper backed by such commodities can be secured more readily and retains transportability and divisibility.
honestly...i'm not even goin there...the ponzi scheme IS MONEY in and of itself...in whatever form of 'matter' that you choose....my thoughts are more aglobal Resource Based Economy with a Council...which plz...let's refrain from poo pooing somethng we've never attempted..it CAN andwill work,whether we choose to exchangeproducts and services from this point with aform of currency or barter or points based.the larger part of our living istotally different..and eliminates mans temptation for GREED
There's a reason that hasn't been tried. Very good reason in my opinion.
It's related to sovereignty. See if you can figure it out.
Oh OK, I'll help. Central Banks have failed to fulfill a reasonable purpose throughout history. A global Central Bank, that is what you are suggesting, will fail on a global scale.
actually i'm not suggesting ANY form of banks at all...i'm suggesting we all give up the BELIEF in them from this moment forward...they are no longer needed.
and SOVEREIGNTY is an understood...it's not something to be negotiated...
let me see if i can help you...this/we are ALL CONSCIOUSNESS...shift your consciousness...and all this WILL change...
What you suggest is removing all choice in economic decisions to an elite class of Council members.
That system also fails every time it's tried on a national scale. I fail to see how scaling up a tyrannical economic system to the entire globe will magically transform it into a just and reasonable system of wealth distribution.
Please outline the difference in implementation between the two.
They both fail for the same reasons. The implementation is the same. Central Authority is not qualified to make local decisions. The most local decision scope is the individual. What's good for your Politburo is not necessarily good for me or the communities I reside in.
@maskedphrogg outline of difference: socialism only requires co-operation of people, no centralization, and no corporations. Fascism requires centralization as socialism DOES NOT (I know you're a liar so you'll say it does but this just makes you a dirty scum bag of a liar), and corporations simply should not exist. 100000000% socialism, no centralization, fact of life, the best system ever. Ever ever ever.
@maskedphrogg already answered fully 10000%. See prior answer. They must be pursued in different manners as I described, all fact, no theory. Socialism: no corporations. Fascism, corporations. fact, not theory, proven in history.
Rinse/repeat no more - your lies are still lies. Marx VS HITLER - NOT EVEN SIMILAR. NOT ONE IOTA.
So you really have no education or you LOVE LYING LIKE A DIRTY BAG OF MANURE.
How long til I invoke Godwin's Law in this thread?
Just like the other thread on this page. How things work in your imagination is not relevant. My point was that historically both Socialism and Fascism get implemented in virtually identical ways. Maybe you won't let facts get in the way of your fantasy but you will be hard put to get reasonable men to agree with your point of view when it is in fact based in fantasy.
no they wouldn't for many reasons....1st and foremost in this culture...the need for domination...is non-existent....their game is more about this than anything...as they print their own money...and everyone else's, yes?
as tenure wouldn't exist the way you and i know
2ndly and an area i didn't get into...but is obvious...the whole consciousness structure would not contain such a barbarious type of thinking...thus again non-existent as the whole exists in unity...
it's not culture, it's guns. Every time the USA army goes into a nation to bring them "freedom" they enslave people to do things with American dollars and banks. Those who refuse are murdered. So it's guns, not culture, making the decision.
everything is connected...these 'same ppl' only exists because part of the collective group now 'thinking' ...contains similar if not the exact level of thinking as the barbarians...even tho many do not 'act' it out presently...
as a great prophet stated, 'if you think it...you might as well have done it!
the consciousness change is happening...and will happen, whether others can 'hold this upcoming collective consciousness' is indicative of whether they may be around to see it and live it
this consciousness change is NOT happening. I'm watching always for it. It is the refusal of having a tribal leader - it is saying the very concept is wrong and abolished forever. We cease to be human, we evolve beyond this failing, when we can abolish leadership and turn to swarming, hive-mind collectives. We are not ready.
if one continues to claim: " - nonsense. The same people would still be holding the purse-strings, and lording it over us by financial whips."...then by these WORDS and visioning ("by their wand and their staff")....they give the exact power 'this entity needs' to keep itself ALIVE and in power....and 'they' KNOW this...that is why so much fear mongering exists...and manipulated great books contain lies...so the collective will play out/drum up what they want the ...supposed end to be..
EntouchNetwork wrote, "visioning...the exact power 'this entity needs' to keep itself ALIVE and in power..."
I actually understand and agree more than you will ever know.
I know the "entity" consists of gatekeepers of the highest magnitude. And that its entrapment game isn't confined to just the recent history of planet earth.
They have ALL the "toys". But we have our perception of the truth, and the courage to keep fighting back.
So keep spreading the word, Entouch. It IS valuable. :)
Together we shall EnVISION a greater world for this Earth, as its original blueprint commands.
They obviously have far from 'all the power'...otherwise, none of us would have awoken to our 'process of REMEMBERING"...thank God for the quantum leap from a 2 DNA helix to the multiple DNA Spiritual Agenda...
what you propose may encourage more fraud than you think. The additional solutions are a) it's all computer controlled, AI controlled ; b) it's all massively surveilled by machinery to ensure humans can't tamper with it; c) no centralized council exists and all decision-plans are 100% public to the world; d) high wealth ratios are illegal
and by "wealth ratio" I mean it is fraud that a lying CEO mafioso makes 400x what a bottom-level worker makes. That ratio is not possible - it is a fraud. It is enslavement. Massive wealth hording like that should be punishable by death. Period. A good system would prevent it by design. Your "council" idea has been tried numerous times and failed every time. Today that council is Bankers.
if 90% of what we 'work' for ...homes/lands/fuel/electric/water/any of the natural resources...are provided...and they are NOT to be charged for...consciousnes would totally shift in the way we view 'WORK"...and our living styles and cultures will be immensely different...greed and man's yearning for being at top? whatever that really is?.....may not exist the way we know it today...we surely wouldn't kill trees to eliminate our oxygen to write bogus policy!
now that is something impossible. The work is at the very least a cost in metabolism, consumption/complexity and time. But it must also be the processing to be a living thing, to use an actual machine, to survive, to harvest. The closest model to what you are speaking of is if we work hard but make AI's with machines merged with us to plan and think for us and to refuse to allow fraud by informing everyone, every machine, of our intents, needs and possible frauds to be checking for.
no; it's not impossible..and is currently being done...and what is coming is not 'understandable' by most of us...because we keep coming from the level of thinking from 'within the matrix'...which will no longer exist and is presently 'imploding'....
machine will NEVER advance the miracle of the human being...u r going from a 2 DNA helix....to quantum leap in multiple DNA...far beyond what you can imagine...
It is not being done. The flock-swarm behaviour of constant improvement is proof when it is, and it is not. The majority of humans need to be doing this. This is not "within the matrix" this is lightyears beyond it. You are within a matrix in a matrix - it's called imagination. If you know the subliminal controls and technologies YOURSELF not just of them to fix it, you would know you are wrong already.
You need to understand how swarm-behaviour is built, adapted, survives adversity, and for humans in particular, you need to understand NLP-techniques and influence. Mind-control techniques if used properly can augment education without introducing lies. When we evolve to a point where no one wants to be lied to or have easy answers, we will be on the first step of the new road. We as a species are not there.
to go beyond your own mind and understanding...as there is something greater...go beyond mind techniques...this is not limited to that...and IT IS happening...
possibly you as of yet do not see the results...just sit tight...they will come faster than you can imagine....
I khow what your saying college07. The best we could do for them going foward would be instruction on implementing a sound building code and emergency responce. They don't even have a fire department.
Since we are stepping on toes how about the increase in "foreign aid" and military assistance to the 1st world country of israel? Look it up!! Yet another reason we are broke!
That is ridiculous. He voices such rhetoric for PR purposes. Banks hold the purse strings that government spends from. The President holds little influence, beyond naming candidates for Governors of the FED positions, over any bank or it's policy on compensation and redistribution of money.
How do you propose to do that w/o being on your own payroll? Any employer that intends to be allowed to do business in the US is required to deduct and forward a certain percentage of every employee's pay to the SSA. Unless you are self-employed you don't get a say, not w/o perjuring yourself, in whether or how much is deducted and sent to the SSA.
Its not really banrupt, billions of federal ious are in its place. Problem is our government has over borrowed and has to print to make up the difference
social Security wasn't even tied to cost of living at all until the sixties. Many people on social security then, were eating canned dogfood (dogfood was cheaper then)
I'm sorry if I offend anyone, but I am young, and I don't really understand all of this, but I've always wondered, why don't we just PRINT more freaking money? Why do we have to TAX more, or cut more? let's make more money, and give everyone some :D
all I say to those who think it so easy to go with out it look at your life with your parents or grandparents without what they have look at them who will they live with? will you pay a nursing home will you pay food and medical bills for them? so you expect your kids or grand kids to do that for you? the cost is much higher than tax dollars . yes we can save but if a flood happened or you need a ramp on your home for your child or school funds or any disaster that savings is gone so quick.
repubtodem 11 months ago
KEEP US INFORMED
amcanmike 2 years ago
I have no social, no security, no?
saudia473j 2 years ago
8 Consecutive UP months for the stock market without a meaningful correction. Another huge bubble is forming and the Fed again fails to respond which shows nothing ever is or has been learned by these guys. This is pre-bubble burst euphoria again where risk taking is going to dangerously absurd levels. It seems this unstoppable momentum means that leverage is once again the rule of the day. If this less than good news can't contain this market to trend sideways rather than up...big ugly bust.
Teyec00n 2 years ago
This is the 18th time out of the past 20 weeks that the first trading day of the week was up. That is clearly bizarre as the first trading day of the week has accounted for 80 percent of all the price appreciation in the stock market since March 2009
mike6459 2 years ago
taxes dont fix a bad monetary system.... niether does cutting spending...
i bet the only way to fix a bad monetary sytem is to... fix the monetary system, not steal more... just a thought for you big government.
fupasack2 2 years ago
Victory sarcasm seems prevalent these days.
911truthncDotOrg 2 years ago
America is partly to blame for the corruption. US$ and US influence is used to bribe then assassinate any African politician trying to stop abuse and exploitation of people for oil, gold or diamonds.
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
Other countries can have universal healthcare because they don't spend so much money on their military budget. The US has to reign in its' military spending so it can afford the social spending. The US doesn't really need 11 aircraft carriers, they cost billions to make and billions to run, get rid of half of them straight away.
What about the many bases it has over the world? There are 47000 people in the bases in Japan and 62000 in bases in Germany. What threat are these countries to the US?
Martian74 2 years ago 3
You are only telling half the story. Excessive tax rates and the concurrent wealth redistribution that such a system entails is what funds those misnamed Universal Care systems. How just is it to take the decision away from a man or woman on how much of their earnings they are allowed to keep?
How just is it to charge someone for a Care system they neither want or need? Why would you punish the healthy?
Charity works, you should try it not deny it.
maskedphrogg 2 years ago
Charity does NOT WORK for healthcare. Taxation does. I pay 11% annual income tax and 13% sales tax (7% and 6% split: until harmonization is in, some times one or the other tax does not apply to purchases; food is not taxed by either). What do YOU pay in taxes for NO HEALTH CARE? Think about that.
If the only way a man can be rich is to ensure another is sick and dies that is EVIL and WE THE PEOPLE SPEAK TO THAT POWER: KILL IT NOW. Kill it dead.
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
Prove it.
At the turn of the century, the 20th century (1900), it worked fine. Of course at that time Health Care was concerned with maintaining health and remedying illness.
Your 2nd q: Now think about what your tax rate will look like when DC tries to fund a Universal Care system that provides incentives for individuals to maintain an insurance plan only when ill. You think Health Care is expensive now, you ain't seen nothing yet.
maskedphrogg 2 years ago
I live it. Come live where I do and watch and see. Donations are nice but taxation pays the bills. If healthcare was 100% personally funded then only the super-rich would have doctors and most other people would be too sick to work. I live in Canada. It's -10 C to -30 C in the warm parts of winter. -40 C = -40 F. In Saskatchewan it can hit -60 C in the wind chill. No doctor = suicide.
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
like I said: my tax rate is 11% income tax to the Canadian Federal Government / CRA (revenue agency) and 13% is the rest combined sales tax. I think I wrote the split wrong last time, sorry. 8% goods+services (federal) sales tax was dropped to 6% as a campaign promise; the rest is Ontario provincial (sales tax).
DC has nothing to do with it.
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
What exactly is your argument?
You claim to live in a nation rife with government interference with the provision of health care, then whine about how poorly it serves those it is claimed to be in service of. That is my point. And if you cut your sales tax rate in half it would be at the level I currently pay (~8% on most consumer good) and with that savings alone you could open a savings account to cover health expenses beyond day to day need. You are you're own enemy w/analysis you submit
maskedphrogg 2 years ago
Wake up Canuck!
If you government didn't coerce the Health Care industry into monopoly market practices then those providers would be forced by natural market conditions to compete, including on price, for the privilege of you choosing them to be allowed to service you. Prices would accordingly fall to an affordable level.
You've been sold a bill of goods called Socialism. Why do you not defend your own best interests against those who would take from you what is not theirs to take?
maskedphrogg 2 years ago
it's affordable to all of us. You've been duped. Capitalism drives up prices, drives down quality. The companies can still compete against each other for quality and contracts. The tax dollars fund it but they do not RUN the companies. WE THE PEOPLE all pay from our taxes and WE DO NOT STARVE FOR IT. Your people do starve for your capitalistic choice.
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
Not ONE CANADIAN I HAVE EVER SPOKEN TO IN MY LIFE, INCLUDING THOSE WHO ARE RICH are saying we should privatize health care. When I was getting my leg operated on, I shared a room with a man who has built yachts and certainly seems to be quite rich describing his home. He too is PROUD of our health care system. He was in for a double bypass.
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
I'm seeing consumer rates of 12 to 20% on the bills. I'm seeing the bills with tax rates people pay all across America from my job. I run credit on people. I see those too as needed to approve or not approve the application as per company policies. My tax rate actually is half what most Americans pay. I've seen a few come up but I don't recall which states. Iowa? Kansas? Can't recall, and of course it's not legal or right for me to write it down for later use.
I'm PROUD of my health care
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
I want only government health care NO CORPORATE HEALTH CARE EVER in my country. NEVER.
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
Took you 3 weeks to come up with that tripe? Yes, I see all four posts. At least your theme is consistent even if it is self defeating.
Is it that you fear competition from a personal viewpoint, or have you simply never seen it close up beyond perhaps a few sporting events?
maskedphrogg 2 years ago
I've been busying watching prices, working, and finding where more fraud is in the vast economy labyrinth. Turns out using the Austrian model of why capitalism does work does in fact help spot fraud very quickly. I'm plotting it short term and long term and matching it to news articles.
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
Sounds good. Must be a semantics disagreement over the meaning and use of the term *capital* and *capitalism*
What is practised in the US in many industries is not capitalism. It is an economics that makes use of capital but precludes private use and direction of privately held capital. Not that "good" cannot be done by government but that by allowing government to confiscate capital it removes the possibility that greater good can be done. Private interest is motivated to do good, gov is not.
maskedphrogg 2 years ago
I suppose that's possible. I re-use a statement I read once that you can't have capitalism without capital, something like that, and if you're living in debt then technically your net capital is below 0.
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
So let's say we had a system, labelled it capitalism, and it was based around savings, production, never consuming more than you produced and investing for returns, accepting risk, and certainly never tried to borrow more than could exist ever, we might have a decent capitalist system. In its most honest and efficient form I can spot only a few bad spots with "capitalism". Making something become scarce that should not be, or the inverse, for example.
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
e.g. clean water, or abundant food. We can have both at very low cost, and yet, with "capitalism" (or some of it?) we end up ruining both, only to assign higher value to what's left of it. Labour: increasing workers (population) also decreases wages if the net amount of work required everywhere doesn't also increase.
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
If government or an agency of it, or employed by it, wanted to do good for a capitalist economy that already had minimal fraud and inefficiency, it would simply advise everyone what changes could be made so everyone is aware, and let them do it (or not: choice = freedom). Sound good so far?
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
as for "manufacturing poverty", a statement I stand by, it does actually need clarifying. If what is (was) abundant (food, clean water, safe shelter) does not get ruined, then "poverty" is only relative, rather than absolute. Absolute poverty sends people to illness and death. Relative poverty that is "better" simply leaves some without the "better" or "best" but is no danger. One is a much better situation than the other.
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
Now you're just rambling.
What is your point? Seems like you want take this discussion and turn it into "Let's pretend" so you can continue to bad mouth Capitalism w/o regret or facing opposing views. You should have quit when you for a moment got your head above water.
maskedphrogg 2 years ago
Sounds like you have rambling and intelligence mixed. You're the idiot rambler.
Have a nice day scum bag. Capitalism can't win. The poverty produced always leads to social uprising and civil war. HAVE IT YOUR WAY. You know what's coming.
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
Capitalism produces poverty.
That is so backwards it *is* funny.
Henceforth that known as wealth shall be called poverty.
Good luck getting that meme to take.
You really thought because you rant on YouTube that only the hoi-poloi would confront you and your dreams of nihilism?
maskedphrogg 2 years ago
for every wealthy person another 10 must starve. That's poverty. Wealth accumulation is a net-theft causing homelessness, poverty and you know what? The rest of the world's already caught on. That's why the capitalists are in so much trouble now. This is reality. No dreams. Wake up little sheeple, wake up.
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
Are you utterly clueless when it comes to matters of accumulation of wealth or are you a bald faced liar?
Your claim implies that those who accumulate wealth do so by taking from the impoverished. An obvious contradiction in terms. Of course it is this contradiction remaining unseen upon which you wish to remedy that impoverished state. Your real motive is to steal from the wealthy and redistribute to others, including the poor, all the while claiming to be undoing some imaginary injustice.
maskedphrogg 2 years ago
no, no, no. You do not understand. I am STATING, not implying. And it is taking from people who are NOT YET impoverished to MAKE THEM BECOME impoverished. Case in point: coal mining, west virginia, ripping mountain peaks apart and shooting at the complainers. Who are unable to protect their private land from being poisoned by these sometimes illegal operations by mining companies. This leads to economic expansion, accumulated wealth, and electricity generation from burning that coal.
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
I don't wish to "remedy" the recently impoverished. I seek, most of all, to ensure those who are not yet impoverished will not be. I don't know how you can undo the total starvation and/or poisoning of a community. The damage to one's home, land, garden, farm, air, water ... it's irreversible, isn't it? Tends to be. My motive is to ensure the stealing stops because there is so much. Capitalism as the word knows it.
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
I was looking at the comments on silverfuturist's videos and a fairly recent one actually shows a model of capitalism I don't think anyone can really argue with. The Amish. I have to say, I'm impressed. And they're religious and I'm an atheist and I'm still very, very impressed. All this time it never really came to mind, there's capitalism without systemic theft, fraud, inflation, killing ... but it's such a small example. THEY should be considered economic geniuses.
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
and of course when I say "sometimes illegal" operations of dumping all the mining waste into the valleys with the rivers feeding the water supply to those who are never compensated (there's that capitalism for ya) by the coal miners, what I'm "implying" is that law enforcement is "for sale" (capitali$m!) to ensure those laws are not enforced.
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
fofoa blogspot com / 2010 / 02 / greece-is-word . html
I know you seem not to understand how capitalism is a machine that manufactures poverty but this will help explain. There are pictures for numerically deficient readers.
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
@maskedphrogg charity failed for health care at the turn of the century. Snake oil all day every day. My tax rate looks AWESOME in CANADA with REAL HEALTH CARE, not HEALTH INSURANCE. I think my health care is HIGHLY AFFORDABLE and HIGHLY EFFECTIVE. It's the most beautiful thing I've ever seen and I LOVE IT. I'm PROUD to pay taxes for it because it's COST EFFECTIVE. Much better than any capitalism could DREAM of being.
ytgv3fc7 1 year ago
@ytgv3fc7
We're not talking about in your imagination. This discussion centers on how things work in the real world.
maskedphrogg 1 year ago
That statement "How just is it to charge someone for a Care system they neither want or need" is quite correct, just substitute "Care" for 'military'. More Americans die or are bankrupted from lack of healthcare and the excessive cost of healthcare. Have a look at the other nations that have 'universal care'(actually every developed nation has it except the US) and you will see that the other nations think that it can work well. Many people try and label it "Socialised medicine" to denigrate it.
Martian74 2 years ago 2
Still only telling half the story. Conveniently you leave out the folks who die from the application of contemporary Health Care. You also disregard the evidence that Care cost is so high as a direct result of government interference in the Care provision market.
Calling it *socialized medicine* casts a spotlight on how costs are passed on to those who don't participate but are required to under force of Law. It is not an emotional conclusion. Costs will be subsidized by socializing them.
maskedphrogg 2 years ago
Please complete the dangling participle:
More Americans die or are bankrupted from lack of healthcare and the excessive cost of healthcare
More Americans die or are bankrupted than for what other reason or reasons?
If you have a statement to make then please make it.
Then justify holding up an industry that kills over 100k every year by way of appropriately administered pharmaceuticals in appropriate dosages. I fear your priorities are not ordered well.
I do that also re: sub Mil for Health
maskedphrogg 2 years ago
@maskedphrogg Just look up the cost per person for healthcare in the US and have a look at the cost per person in Australia or Canada (the US spends nearly double). Then have a look at the life expectancy for those same countries (The US is several years lower). The US has the 'freedom' to spend more yet live less, does that make sense? Health care is so much better for the people in the countries that have universal coverage that it would be ignorant to think that the current US system is best.
Martian74 2 years ago
What the hell does cost/person have to do with paying for the Health Care of others? Of course you reduce your own expense by passing it on to others.
Still trying to sidetrack debate with misleading feel-good proclamations.
Then you think your stealthy by stealing one of my points. What *do* we get for overpriced medicine that is propped up by Government interference? I think you're on to something! Lower length of life expectancy and higher rates of illness and other maladies.
maskedphrogg 2 years ago
The cost/person has EVERYTHING to do with it. ALWAYS WILL. That's why you Americans "don't get it". The only right way to have healthcare is if those who can't pay, are paid for, so later on they can work and be healthy and do the same for others. Everything else is a disaster. And immoral.
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
spoken liek a true socialist. Go fuck yourself fag
12Oc7ock 2 years ago
Socialism is good for everyone, capitalism as practiced in America is pure evil, so go FUCK YOURSELF, MUSSOLINI.
Maybe you're offended by fags ; I'm not ; but everyone should be offended by FASCISTS.
I pay so little for healthcare and it's always there. You pay so much and you can get CUT RIGHT OFF AT ANY TIME. NO RECOURSE. Or none available to start with - ineligibility. NO ONE in Canada is INELIGIBLE for health care. NO ONE.
Go f** ... no... go STARVE yourself. I know YOU WILL. I won't!
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
the only reason American taxation leads to overspending is because your ability to detect and remove fraud is about 0%. Now it doesn't matter what you do or don't pay in taxes, you have no options that have no corruption. Your system is falling apart.
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
@maskedphrogg Of course cost/person is the issue because it is the system that is being discussed, not an individual person basis. You can't fix the whole system if everybody has different ideas what it will be. Remember that America doesn't have universal healthcare but does have the highest costs for the average American to access the healthcare system yet the average American is living less than the average person in Australia, Canada etc.
Martian74 2 years ago
@Martian
Finally you reveal your true colors. Damn the people, Full Speed Ahead!
You have no qualms in spending other people's money. How noble of you.
By justifying per person each person has no equity in your eyes. After all, you know better than each person what is good for them.
I think you have China syndrome. The State already has such tyrannical authority over individual earnings in China. Tell us again how well that system is working.
maskedphrogg 2 years ago
@maskedphrogg It seems that you think the current system is the best in the world so there is no need to fix it. Why don't the numbers show that the current system is the best? Because it isn't and needs to be fixed. As for the China comparison, you are just trying to confuse the argument as it isn't a developed nation and it is communist. My comparison nations are developed and democratic so are much more similar to the US than China. Fix the system or more Americans will die needlessly.
Martian74 2 years ago
That you would even consider my replies as defence of the status quo reveals your utter lack of comprehension of the topics we discuss.
Fix the system? What system?
Introduce competition BACK into care provision industries, watch prices drop dramatically.
Remove government enforced protections of doctors and pharma industry that do harm.
Any more fixes you care to discuss?
maskedphrogg 2 years ago
cost per person is critically important ; paying for others is never permanent. Those who are paid for will work due to being healthy and will pay in themselves LATER. That's why it works. It always works. Always will. This isn't "feel good" this is "very seldom feel so sick you can't work" and pay those taxes to support everything, and look - it's COLD in Canada and still, we're not sidelined out of work with the flu or colds or absurdity. We know work pays bills and...
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
... taxed income and purchases pays for healthcare, for roads, for everything we all need. Being socialist is GOOD. Being capitalist is absurd. Just imagine if everyone used roads but only some people paid for them; just imagine if no one paid for them and decided that was OK and further banned public use. We'd have fortresses, villages of them, tribes, no cities, no nation. It's idiotic.
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
further, without socialism we'd have no police. None. We'd have mafia, but no police. And what about the Army?
The US army is a 100% socialist enterprise paid by taxes, and the theory is they benefit every citizen so it's paid back in benefit.
So if you support the troops, YOU ARE A SOCIALIST. Feels good to show people how to stop lying to themselves. WAKE UP SHEEPLE. BAAA BAAA.
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
Yawn...
Military service is not voluntary, it is a responsibility to ensure other rights are guarded. Therefor everyone in the domain protected is responsible for the costs of maintaining those forces if not participating by joining those forces. Of course it's socialized, everyone receives the same benefit.
Geez, do you proponents of silly ever tire of creating lies and re-writing history to support your irrational conclusions?
maskedphrogg 2 years ago
I think you actually just did it, and proved my point all in one.
Thank you for proving me right.
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
how is it you ignore having a socialized-taxation for military and police that act like military, in a way that's millions of times over-kill to what's useful to your nation? And not spend similar money or more (in balance) on healthcare? Healthcare cost is LOWER with my government intervention because there's no incentive to jack up the costs for nothing (profit = evil).
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
Hahahaha... can't defend stealing from your neighbors to support your own ill prepared and maintained health so now you try to derail the debate and turn to some other issue that's hardly even tangential.
You just dumped what integrity we had yet to see into the toilet.
C'mon back when you can defend your position on it's own merits and not the lack of merit of an entirely different debate.
And not lie about gov subsidies inherent in the Canadian health care industry.
maskedphrogg 2 years ago
no kidding.....
ninesticks 2 years ago
cool
kissinger666 2 years ago
We are not citizens of our United State! we are debt slaves. Our Fed Gov. went BANKRUPT in 1933! we our tax slaves to rome (foreign masters) of us. Your SS# is proof! Vision victory should tell people our history, and how this works!
mattandpatti222 2 years ago
this video is loading but will not play for me
seks03 2 years ago
Daniel, OMG Really!! Did CNBC really say that! Oh shit, now I'm weelly, weelly scared! LOL Let's all chant now, "YES, WE CAN!!"
magbigblock 2 years ago
governments do not work?
governments work perfectly.
Just not for you.
Ask the bailout crowd weather governments work. Ask the subsidized farmers if gvt works, ask GM bond holders if it works, ask Fanny en Freddy if it works, ask the military industrial complex if gvt works, ask the private jails if it works.
I just have a bit of a problem with people who say government does not work.
They take halve my income and probably more and I can not do a thing about it. Works pretty damn good.
modelmark 2 years ago
Great show as always..
i have a Question have they "all" put their cards into a petrodollar warfare model, in the 70's and everything else is a lie and a scam.
Or is that just one theory among many?
AR15Truther 2 years ago
LOL @ the study. Both those guys never get caught with their pants down. /sarcasm
kmg501 2 years ago
CNBC and NBC are based in Manhattan in NY. I really do not think these folks get outside the confines of the island of Manhattan and see what is really going on.
By the time I retire, steak will be replaced by Monsanto beef biscuit.
shatteek 2 years ago
Monsanto beef biscuits..lol
neanam 2 years ago
I can't simply post - so I am only using this esponse to post originally. vision - you aren't doing anyone any good with your videos. What is your point? Seriously. Why tell everyone that all is bad, cost more, and more taxes. What are WE supposed to do to help ourselves? Any advise that is REAL would be nice. Otherwise, enjoy your 15 min's of fame as Warholl said.
casinobeachbum 2 years ago
@BNSFrailfan the dollar is getting better. The dollar hit a low in november and has been going up since. Its now at 77.323 and it was at 74.17. Just hang in there, its getting better slowly.
odeswx 2 years ago
Please Read: California does have a Constitutional requirement for a balanced budget to be submitted, but not passed...
gwuengr2 2 years ago
Daniel, if they start messing with Social Security, I think the "Grey Panthers" and the AARP might be two of the few organizations left in the USA who are actually capable of organization, and organized resistance.
Dunno - we'll see...
nameofthepen 2 years ago
VV....Keep spreading the truth....it is very contagious!!!
petiemac12 2 years ago
Good info though... Best Wishes
ahdoo123 2 years ago
You have a "Vote Martha Coakley" ad running at the bottom of your video??? "learn where and when to vote for M.C.. act now!!!
Are you kidding me..please let me know if you have anything to do with this ad. "Ads by Google"
What does this mean... Do you have anything to do with this?
God help us all
Please respond
Andrew
ahdoo123 2 years ago
Who is Martha Coakley? Why r u concerned?
Adahondeayenh 2 years ago
no, google picks the ads.
visionvictory 2 years ago
@visionvictory Thanks for the reply... I did'nt think you were heading that way, but I had to say somthing... Love your videos, and hope to start making my own in the near furure... Keep up the good work!
ahdoo123 2 years ago
Thanks once again.
whiskerchild 2 years ago
Fear the fool that when fate says "who will lead?" Responds "I will" instead of we shall overcome together.
azezel2311 2 years ago
V.V. Keep up the good HARD WORK. I know the time and effort involved in what you do, i genuinely appreciate it.
peppegg 2 years ago
Here in PR, a US territory, the governor actually just recently lowered commercial and personal taxes significantly in order to stimulate the economy. When do you think they'll raise taxes?
AndresInChristus 2 years ago
Thanks dan
yourmomscalling 2 years ago
6 star rating...even though 5 is the max.
tabcan 2 years ago
parsnip economics 101
think we should write CDS ...
on all these alt a.....
residential mortgage backed securities
get AIG on the phone ...
just like dominos
lined up in a row ..
chena3 2 years ago
chena3 2 years ago
It's always the government's fault, huh Daniel? It couldn't possibly be the greedy corporations, right? It's funny how you never acknowledge the horrible business decisions of the Baby Boomer generation. Worst generation this country has ever seen.
bimlala1 2 years ago
government, big business - is there much of a difference these days?
Horoist 2 years ago
the stripes are showing now... hum???
Just checking, but I see a new trend.......
ahdoo123 2 years ago
one is the buyer and the other is the product on the market?
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
Do you blame the dog for over eating or the owner?
visionvictory 2 years ago
Thank you for the news! God Bless!
POSSUMTOHIDE 2 years ago
Well done! Those of us who have been "awakened" knew that a dollar crisis has been looming for years, it's just a matter of WHEN!
POSSUMTOHIDE 2 years ago
funniest video I've seen from you so far, surprised you can keep a straight face.
Thankyou cnbc of tout TV!
Atoyota 2 years ago
lol - a two year study? How about a 5 minute lesson in economics, done.
aw3212 2 years ago 2
Well, whoopie-do Daniel.
I'm glad you are paying attention to CNBC. There may be something in what they say you know.
It'd be nice if you'd get your head out of the sand and notice that there may be problems ahead.
You may want to buy yourself a bit of gold or something, just in case, y'know? May come in handy sometime.
Just watched v=cwdO2FLg1Rs
About how gov kills you - Fairly good documentary.
Perhaps some of your viewers may find it interesting.
Cheers 5*
zalida100 2 years ago
Zalida100 - good link. I will watch that vid you suggested, which is entitled, "Innocents Betrayed - Gun Control History Part 1". Thanks.
Here's a quote from a surprising source:
"Among the many misdeeds of British rule in India, history will look upon the Act depriving a whole nation of arms as the blackest."
-Mahatma Gandhi
nameofthepen 2 years ago
@nameofthepen - Good quote. The suggested vid may help people to understand how ALL govments think.
I think when asked what he thought of western civilisaion, Ghandi replied "Yes. I think that would be a good idea" I'm sure you know the quote, but i thought it was pretty witty.
Most people still think of the west as being "civilised", but if they are honest and look closer, it is possible to see how it really is.
All this govm't and civilised stuff is just an illusion.
Thanks 4 reply
zalida100 2 years ago
just today stacked 45 pounds of frozen processed venison hamburger and sausage in the freezer. 50 lbs of brown rice in the food hamper. ITs a start.
WHEREtheFUNK 2 years ago 3
@WHEREtheFUNK awesome. plenty of deer in the states, i don't know why more people don't hunt them as a good alternative to red meat
Meathead36 2 years ago
do you have a way to power the freezer if the power is cut off?
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
I have a generator that runs on gasoline. If there is no gasoline I will have to resort to PLAN 'Z'.
outofdebt4ever 2 years ago
@outofdebt4ever I found a video about the dewpointe water filtration / extraction, the guy runs it off an inverter using propane tanks. They make electricity for the machine; various machines; it needs 700 W power. Yamaha inverter. There's a plan Z
/watch?v=3O7cWYWAD4Q
that's all I could find this time around
ytgv3fc7 7 months ago
@outofdebt4ever also google "teg power brick" or youtube search it, it lets you burn wood to get heat, the heat differential creates electricity. youtube search 'hot stuff' from engineer775
ytgv3fc7 7 months ago
My wife and I went out today and did a little survival bulk shopping today. Whoa! We noted a big jump in prices at the food stores. Also noted some pretty outrageous variances in prices from store to store on same item purchases. Buckle in folks, I think we are rounding turn three and there's not much time left for a pit stop!
Shameonfed 2 years ago 2
Shop the sales. Now that you have accumulated some make it part of your weekly life...that is looking for deals
jonah70757 2 years ago
I heard that... Thank God I have been alert for at least the past 10 months... Prepare now!!! do'nt wait for the Gov. to Bail you out..............
ahdoo123 2 years ago
sugar just hit a 30 year high in price due to bad weather for sugar cane harvesting. As you may guess, almost anything you eat contains sugar, certainly all baked goods. REAL food inflation in Canada is something like 8% to 15%. Don't know about you guys but I am guessing it will be worse.
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
Yeah, they are starting to admit it. After all, they don't want the American people to be able to say that they weren't warned or were lied to. The fact that they didn't warn us and lied to us all the way up to the end really doesn't matter huh?
veritasfiles 2 years ago
see reply under maskedphrogg....
EntouchNetwork 2 years ago
Some reason you don't want this discussion to continue in public?
EntouchNetwork wrote:
--
unfortunately you only hear what is going on in your mind...and some of the apparent limited belief systems you have....there would be much more of a different consciousness given there was a 'council' of some sort...but going there in conversation given your comments...sadly would be a waste of time.
--
Now tell us how that differs from Soviet style top down governance? Your dream is a nightmare.
maskedphrogg 2 years ago
because you keep coming from the level of thinking that created the problem....
"today's problems cannot be solved by the same level of thinking by which they are/were created" ~ Albert Einstein
EntouchNetwork 2 years ago
"level of thinking that created the problem"
That is why you tried to take a public discussion private? Makes no sense to me. But neither does your suggestion of using fantasy as a vector for change in behaviour of malicious agents.
You can keep your nightmare vision of Soviet style Politburos to yourself too. Is it so hard for you to learn from the examples set by others?
maskedphrogg 2 years ago
if only i was in charge ,then i could fix this mess.
mrzack888 2 years ago
Just what we need a benevolent dictator!
jonah70757 2 years ago
maybe a benevolent planner to set things right then let everyone else keep it going. Pretty much that's all that ever works. We call it innovation and invention.
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
Design and implementation are two wholly separate processes. Design provides ideas, implementing those ideas under a regime of forced change does not ensure benevolence. It gives faux justification for the forced nature of the change.
Lenin, Stalin, Mussolini ... it's been tried, and failed.
Next!
maskedphrogg 2 years ago
Subcontractor.... isn't that a name for "self-employed?"
How long do you suppose you will be allowed to "decide" not to pay into SSA fund?
I'm not defending their methods, only trying to clarify the ground rules and who they apply to.
maskedphrogg 2 years ago 2
more...
MSM says that a dollar crisis looms.?... heck, i remember a "study" that revealed that if there are more than one teenager in a car, they are more likely to speed etc...
as my wife will say...they have a profound understanding of the obvious...
tell me something i can use.
ninesticks 2 years ago
crisis? what crisis....i just read that after "tough" negotiations the unions (also govt employees) will not have pay any taxes on their top of the line health care....
falling falling and soon there will be no legitimacy at all
ninesticks 2 years ago
Good one Daniel, It's nice to know that the main st media is right on top of things. Next they will be reporting about the actual dollar collapse right after it happens, and what a shock that it happened. They will say that there was know way that anybody could have seen it coming. And you know the fed will say that they did evrything they could to prevent it.
bossduff 2 years ago
I'll field this one EntouchNetwork.
Sound money.
Historically only commodity backed money has demonstrated the ability to retain value. Gold and Silver have been preferred commodities for their transportability and divisibility. iow you can take them w/you readily and easily cut up samples of them for varying denominations of value.
Paper backed by such commodities can be secured more readily and retains transportability and divisibility.
maskedphrogg 2 years ago
honestly...i'm not even goin there...the ponzi scheme IS MONEY in and of itself...in whatever form of 'matter' that you choose....my thoughts are more aglobal Resource Based Economy with a Council...which plz...let's refrain from poo pooing somethng we've never attempted..it CAN andwill work,whether we choose to exchangeproducts and services from this point with aform of currency or barter or points based.the larger part of our living istotally different..and eliminates mans temptation for GREED
EntouchNetwork 2 years ago
There's a reason that hasn't been tried. Very good reason in my opinion.
It's related to sovereignty. See if you can figure it out.
Oh OK, I'll help. Central Banks have failed to fulfill a reasonable purpose throughout history. A global Central Bank, that is what you are suggesting, will fail on a global scale.
maskedphrogg 2 years ago
actually i'm not suggesting ANY form of banks at all...i'm suggesting we all give up the BELIEF in them from this moment forward...they are no longer needed.
and SOVEREIGNTY is an understood...it's not something to be negotiated...
let me see if i can help you...this/we are ALL CONSCIOUSNESS...shift your consciousness...and all this WILL change...
EntouchNetwork 2 years ago
i believe i can fly.. i believe i can touch the sky. think about it every night and day.. spread my wings and fly away.
myheadhurtsnow 2 years ago 3
Fine, what you suggest is even worse than a bank.
What you suggest is removing all choice in economic decisions to an elite class of Council members.
That system also fails every time it's tried on a national scale. I fail to see how scaling up a tyrannical economic system to the entire globe will magically transform it into a just and reasonable system of wealth distribution.
Apparently Communism is only dead in Russia.
maskedphrogg 2 years ago
you're not talking about communism. You're talking about Fascism.
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
Please outline the difference in implementation between the two.
They both fail for the same reasons. The implementation is the same. Central Authority is not qualified to make local decisions. The most local decision scope is the individual. What's good for your Politburo is not necessarily good for me or the communities I reside in.
maskedphrogg 2 years ago
@maskedphrogg outline of difference: socialism only requires co-operation of people, no centralization, and no corporations. Fascism requires centralization as socialism DOES NOT (I know you're a liar so you'll say it does but this just makes you a dirty scum bag of a liar), and corporations simply should not exist. 100000000% socialism, no centralization, fact of life, the best system ever. Ever ever ever.
ytgv3fc7 1 year ago
@ytgv3fc7
Now answer the question posed.
Show a difference in *implementation*
Show how the two systems, fascism and socialism, are pursued in different manners.
You can't because they are not pursued in different manners. The rhetoric may differ but the implementations are virtually identical.
An elite group at the top dictates to a servant class below.
Now go read an unbiased history book. Mein Kampf was a personal essay on intent. NAZI Germany was the end result. Rinse/repeat for Marx/USSR
maskedphrogg 1 year ago
@maskedphrogg already answered fully 10000%. See prior answer. They must be pursued in different manners as I described, all fact, no theory. Socialism: no corporations. Fascism, corporations. fact, not theory, proven in history.
Rinse/repeat no more - your lies are still lies. Marx VS HITLER - NOT EVEN SIMILAR. NOT ONE IOTA.
So you really have no education or you LOVE LYING LIKE A DIRTY BAG OF MANURE.
ytgv3fc7 1 year ago
@ytgv3fc7
Here we go again.
How long til I invoke Godwin's Law in this thread?
Just like the other thread on this page. How things work in your imagination is not relevant. My point was that historically both Socialism and Fascism get implemented in virtually identical ways. Maybe you won't let facts get in the way of your fantasy but you will be hard put to get reasonable men to agree with your point of view when it is in fact based in fantasy.
maskedphrogg 1 year ago
if you do not believe in churches...you do not go and support them, yes?
the same is true for any form of banking...WALK AWAY...
for the LEGAL system..the same...
for politicians...the same
they thrive because we give them energy....
EntouchNetwork 2 years ago
Agree I have not get $1 more in the bank then I need for a check to clear to pay a bill. No not one $1 more. They can go to hell.
jonah70757 2 years ago
EntouchNetwork - nonsense. The same people would still be holding the purse-strings, and lording it over us by financial whips.
nameofthepen 2 years ago
no they wouldn't for many reasons....1st and foremost in this culture...the need for domination...is non-existent....their game is more about this than anything...as they print their own money...and everyone else's, yes?
as tenure wouldn't exist the way you and i know
2ndly and an area i didn't get into...but is obvious...the whole consciousness structure would not contain such a barbarious type of thinking...thus again non-existent as the whole exists in unity...
EntouchNetwork 2 years ago
it's not culture, it's guns. Every time the USA army goes into a nation to bring them "freedom" they enslave people to do things with American dollars and banks. Those who refuse are murdered. So it's guns, not culture, making the decision.
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
everything is connected...these 'same ppl' only exists because part of the collective group now 'thinking' ...contains similar if not the exact level of thinking as the barbarians...even tho many do not 'act' it out presently...
as a great prophet stated, 'if you think it...you might as well have done it!
the consciousness change is happening...and will happen, whether others can 'hold this upcoming collective consciousness' is indicative of whether they may be around to see it and live it
EntouchNetwork 2 years ago
this consciousness change is NOT happening. I'm watching always for it. It is the refusal of having a tribal leader - it is saying the very concept is wrong and abolished forever. We cease to be human, we evolve beyond this failing, when we can abolish leadership and turn to swarming, hive-mind collectives. We are not ready.
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
if one continues to claim: " - nonsense. The same people would still be holding the purse-strings, and lording it over us by financial whips."...then by these WORDS and visioning ("by their wand and their staff")....they give the exact power 'this entity needs' to keep itself ALIVE and in power....and 'they' KNOW this...that is why so much fear mongering exists...and manipulated great books contain lies...so the collective will play out/drum up what they want the ...supposed end to be..
EntouchNetwork 2 years ago
EntouchNetwork wrote, "visioning...the exact power 'this entity needs' to keep itself ALIVE and in power..."
I actually understand and agree more than you will ever know.
I know the "entity" consists of gatekeepers of the highest magnitude. And that its entrapment game isn't confined to just the recent history of planet earth.
They have ALL the "toys". But we have our perception of the truth, and the courage to keep fighting back.
So keep spreading the word, Entouch. It IS valuable. :)
nameofthepen 2 years ago
Together we shall EnVISION a greater world for this Earth, as its original blueprint commands.
They obviously have far from 'all the power'...otherwise, none of us would have awoken to our 'process of REMEMBERING"...thank God for the quantum leap from a 2 DNA helix to the multiple DNA Spiritual Agenda...
EntouchNetwork 2 years ago
what you propose may encourage more fraud than you think. The additional solutions are a) it's all computer controlled, AI controlled ; b) it's all massively surveilled by machinery to ensure humans can't tamper with it; c) no centralized council exists and all decision-plans are 100% public to the world; d) high wealth ratios are illegal
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
and by "wealth ratio" I mean it is fraud that a lying CEO mafioso makes 400x what a bottom-level worker makes. That ratio is not possible - it is a fraud. It is enslavement. Massive wealth hording like that should be punishable by death. Period. A good system would prevent it by design. Your "council" idea has been tried numerous times and failed every time. Today that council is Bankers.
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
take a moment to imagine it....
if 90% of what we 'work' for ...homes/lands/fuel/electric/water/any of the natural resources...are provided...and they are NOT to be charged for...consciousnes would totally shift in the way we view 'WORK"...and our living styles and cultures will be immensely different...greed and man's yearning for being at top? whatever that really is?.....may not exist the way we know it today...we surely wouldn't kill trees to eliminate our oxygen to write bogus policy!
EntouchNetwork 2 years ago
now that is something impossible. The work is at the very least a cost in metabolism, consumption/complexity and time. But it must also be the processing to be a living thing, to use an actual machine, to survive, to harvest. The closest model to what you are speaking of is if we work hard but make AI's with machines merged with us to plan and think for us and to refuse to allow fraud by informing everyone, every machine, of our intents, needs and possible frauds to be checking for.
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
no; it's not impossible..and is currently being done...and what is coming is not 'understandable' by most of us...because we keep coming from the level of thinking from 'within the matrix'...which will no longer exist and is presently 'imploding'....
machine will NEVER advance the miracle of the human being...u r going from a 2 DNA helix....to quantum leap in multiple DNA...far beyond what you can imagine...
EntouchNetwork 2 years ago
It is not being done. The flock-swarm behaviour of constant improvement is proof when it is, and it is not. The majority of humans need to be doing this. This is not "within the matrix" this is lightyears beyond it. You are within a matrix in a matrix - it's called imagination. If you know the subliminal controls and technologies YOURSELF not just of them to fix it, you would know you are wrong already.
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
You need to understand how swarm-behaviour is built, adapted, survives adversity, and for humans in particular, you need to understand NLP-techniques and influence. Mind-control techniques if used properly can augment education without introducing lies. When we evolve to a point where no one wants to be lied to or have easy answers, we will be on the first step of the new road. We as a species are not there.
ytgv3fc7 2 years ago
i would introduce to you..
to go beyond your own mind and understanding...as there is something greater...go beyond mind techniques...this is not limited to that...and IT IS happening...
possibly you as of yet do not see the results...just sit tight...they will come faster than you can imagine....
EntouchNetwork 2 years ago
I khow what your saying college07. The best we could do for them going foward would be instruction on implementing a sound building code and emergency responce. They don't even have a fire department.
Since we are stepping on toes how about the increase in "foreign aid" and military assistance to the 1st world country of israel? Look it up!! Yet another reason we are broke!
roughcutone2 2 years ago
Λ $tagering w]-[opping unimaginable deluding 362 'days' since Puppet President
Obama's inauguration
without ET Disclosure....
BabybooR33 2 years ago
That is ridiculous. He voices such rhetoric for PR purposes. Banks hold the purse strings that government spends from. The President holds little influence, beyond naming candidates for Governors of the FED positions, over any bank or it's policy on compensation and redistribution of money.
maskedphrogg 2 years ago 2
The sarcasm in these videos is very annoying but I agree with what you say and enjoy the information.
SevereTstormFan 2 years ago
How do you propose to do that w/o being on your own payroll? Any employer that intends to be allowed to do business in the US is required to deduct and forward a certain percentage of every employee's pay to the SSA. Unless you are self-employed you don't get a say, not w/o perjuring yourself, in whether or how much is deducted and sent to the SSA.
maskedphrogg 2 years ago
Hell let's do both LOL
skibee50 2 years ago
Its a tax on the middle class without breaking his pledge.
tax the banks = banks raise fees
visionvictory 2 years ago
LOL. Well thank goodness for good ole CNBC.
NIVPsalm51 2 years ago
Its not really banrupt, billions of federal ious are in its place. Problem is our government has over borrowed and has to print to make up the difference
1mealperday 2 years ago
social Security wasn't even tied to cost of living at all until the sixties. Many people on social security then, were eating canned dogfood (dogfood was cheaper then)
SpringboardShop 2 years ago
great
toshibavoodoo 2 years ago
I'm sorry if I offend anyone, but I am young, and I don't really understand all of this, but I've always wondered, why don't we just PRINT more freaking money? Why do we have to TAX more, or cut more? let's make more money, and give everyone some :D
celbel21 2 years ago