Harrit is a CIA plant. The 9/11 Truth Movement is a CIA Propaganda operation. The government runs on FEAR. They failed to prevent 9/11. To cover this and to make them seem hyper-competent the CIA started the 9/11 Truth Movement. FACTS:
1. Every single 9/11 Truth Movement media (websites, etc) LISTS THE EXACT SAME TALKING POINTS.
2. Such coordination across EVERY SINGLE MEDIUM AT THE SAME TIME suggests a massive effort.
3. Such a massive effort at propaganda is a classic CIA operation.
It's interesting that Harrit says the nanothermite wouldn't have been enough to bring down the towers and that a LOT of conventional explosives would have been needed as well. That raises the problem of the lack any pattern of 130 db charges, lack of any pattern of det flashes, lack of any trace of det charges in the seismic record, lack of any destritus of det charges found in the debris, etc. etc.
@PoetryHound Maybe there isn't. But the thermite was clearly there. So it must be asked..
1) Why is thermite found in all those dust samples, and more importantly, 2) why didn't NIST ever test for thermite, let alone address the matter in their reports?
@PoetryHound Here's just my hypothesis, and I admit I could be wrong (I'm no expert), but maybe the thermite was powerful enough to destroy almost all physical evidence of other explosives. We all saw how much dust there was, and Harrit clearly explains that nanothermite is incredibly powerful.
As far as sound goes, it could be that 1) the use of thermite decreased the normal amount of explosives needed, and 2) there were still plenty of bangs heard: /watch?v=ERhoNYj9_fg
Mr. Harrit certainly appears to be respectable. He seems to know what he is talking about, and he does not appear to be lying. If he is not lying, and not wrong about the presence of nano-thermite in the rubble, it is difficult to believe the official explanation. Of course, there are many other reasons to have real doubt about the official explanation.
In the end this is just one more instance of a government telling lies to motivate its people to go to war. But it still matters.
Well I always questioned a big fireball coming out of 'just a collapsing building' (the first ever steel made building collapsing because of 'fire'). Great to see that there are some smart people who can prove this indeed:)
Unless you have worked in a government funded lab you probably do not know how government grants are awarded in the USA. The decisions are made by a committee called a "study section." It is a common lament among scientists that even ONE enemy on the study section of twenty people or more can utterly destroy a promising career. Questioning anything about 9/11 will make more than one enemy! In academic circles, ANY questioning of 9/11 is considered anti-Semitic, which is the kiss of death.
The Truth is slowly coming out! As time goes by, people will open thier eyes and see it.... one day, the Bastards who really did this will be found out, and they will HAVE to pay for what they done! No matter how little they were involved!
ExtraExtra.truther911.remember jfk,the patsy,other shooters that were allowed&then patsy gets blame.same with 911.irans ahmadenejad was key4creating final piece of911puzzle.alquada responds to ahmadenejad saying they get credit,not inside job.urika!for11/2years radiocontrolled demoexplosives r planted in3buildings,jewish owner doubles insurance,israelimosad intell knows alqaeda 3hijacks,US operates allow,missle pentagon,iraqwar,patriot act,6wars now,$falls,10years2truth! RonPaul2012save r USA
A lot of people blame Bush for planning the 911 attacks, but I very much doubt they would have involved him, I dont think the criminals that pulled off this well planed operation would risk having someone with that much power to know what was going on because if he back out that would put them in to much risk. Its my belief that Dick Chaney, Rumsfeld were at the top. Bush just got cought up in the politics afterwards, and was pressured to go along most likely through some kind of blackmail
@wollclark Hmm, paint sounds like a good answer. Never thought of that. Do paints contain aluminum as well as iron oxide and are suspended in a silicone matrix?
@wollclark LOL.... I'm sorry, does paint turn into liquid iron microspheres when it is ignited? Is paint built from the nano-scale up? Must be some expensive and DANGEROUS paint!! What a ludicrous conspiracy theory.
@wollclark What are you talking about? They are an independent source. And they have let others in the scientific community test them as well. They also have to be extremely careful not to let the evidence be destroyed by giving it to some fake "independent" investigators.
And yet they haven't published their findings in a respectable journal. Their one publishing was in a vanity journal (not peer-reviewed), and published under the nose of the editor who resigned when she found out that such unscientific studies could be published so easily.
@wollclark Or maybe she resigned because the paper was proving that the government was lying to the masses, and so she was afraid her position in the community may be jeopardized.
Ya know what everyone...... my pantry blew up the other day...cause? a Chocolate cake....we didnt find a chocolate cake but we did find all the ingredients mixed together in the dust.
One day soon thanks to the use of supercomputers every sample of dust, and all video footage and audio will be fed in to a supercomputer to reveal and accurately extrapolate every single detail of the events of that day.
These same supercomputers will completely annihilate and dispel all of the lies that were being churned out by the American government.
Technology and science will reveal everything and we will all live to find out the truth and someone is going to have answer to all of us.
@themomentofclarity I think he meant that faster computers and better software will allow future skeptics to simulate the collapses of the towers and WTC7 the way NIST did. We will find that it is impossible to simulate the collapses with realistic assumptions. To simulate WTC7, one will have to assume the steel suddenly changed to linguini.
@ctcole77 Con Ed substation: No one complained about the design BEFORE 9/11.
How much thermite? Tons! Bad guys had access. But let's say NIST is right; one column that buckled due to fire brought down the whole building. OK, how much thermite to weaken that one column? Or maybe the thermite just started the diesel fires. The point is, thermite should not have been there. Sulfur should not have been there (see Prof Jonathan Barnett). Plenty of reasons for ARSON investigation!
Niels Harrit "estimated" 10-100 tons of thermite was used, COULD HE BE MORE VAGUE?
Besides, Niels Harrit has admitted thermite would not work unless combined with explosives like TNT. Niels Harrit admits no explosives like TNT were found in his dust.
How about the other questions? Unless you're afraid of the twoof!
@ctcole77 Sorry, I forgot the last queston: yes, a passport could survive.
Did you read the rest of what I wrote? I suspect ARSON in WTC7.
Why? The work of Prof. Jonathan Barnett. If fire really brought down WTC7, could it have been ARSON? ARSON with thermite? Also known as "high temperature accelerant arson" among arson investigators.
@ctcole77 (nano) thermite reacts exothermic and therefor just 100gr of dynamite could be used to set the whole place on fire and let some (nano)thermite bombs in action. I surely can't find that 100gr of explosives in several million tons of rubbish ;) You had to do more research I suppose lol
@Dared2DoIT I hope the murders are still alive when the truth is revealed. Then again, if they aren't we'll know where they'll be, and it won't be heaven.
if jet fuel can melt steal...then all airplanes would melt in mid air. Kerosene and jet fuel burn at the same temperature, and yet kerosene stoves made of steel do not melt. Kerosene and jet fuel burn at around 1000+ degrees...steel melts at 2000+ degrees...and thermite heats to 2500 degrees.
@Dared2DoIT Good point, but steel melts at 2800 deg. F, so kerosene and jet fuel are even less suspect as a way to create the tons of molten steel found in the basements of all three WTC bldgs. Huge amounts of nanothermite material have been found in all dust samples from 9/11 that have been tested. Thermite is easily capable of melting steel. Various additives can adjust the temperatures reached in the reaction. Nanothermite can be formed into shaped charges that cut steel explosively.
@tetralite123 That's right. Unignited traces of thermate/thermite were found in dust samples from the 9/11 site. Naturally the US government had all other evidence quickly shipped overseas for recycling.
The question is who or why would do this? I suspect it has to do with the super-secret rich and powerful sub-cultures that were flexing their muscles to show how powerful they are against those who may have chosen to oppose them. Look at whose family was in the buildings before the demolitions.
@giggilamour Bush was just the current placeholder during 9/11. The orders come from the big money banks and corporations who make their biggest profit from funding wars (Cheney works for them). Recent peer-reviewed science has proved beyond a shadow of a doubt (at least to those who understand basic science) that explosives were used in the demolition of the three WTC building on 9/11. Who did it? The suspects are limited by the sheer scale of the tragedy. It takes big money and media control.
@MsBiggestpimp Yup! It's called a "false flag" event and it's the oldest trick in the book for gaining support for a war, starting a war and escalating a war. If 9/11 wasn't an inside job it would be the exception to the rule all throughout history. You attack your own people and blame it on the enemy of your choice. You get instant support from your country's people who are angered and fed lies by the mainstream media.
This has been flagged as spam show
Harrit is a CIA plant. The 9/11 Truth Movement is a CIA Propaganda operation. The government runs on FEAR. They failed to prevent 9/11. To cover this and to make them seem hyper-competent the CIA started the 9/11 Truth Movement. FACTS:
1. Every single 9/11 Truth Movement media (websites, etc) LISTS THE EXACT SAME TALKING POINTS.
2. Such coordination across EVERY SINGLE MEDIUM AT THE SAME TIME suggests a massive effort.
3. Such a massive effort at propaganda is a classic CIA operation.
pantspoopie 5 days ago
It's interesting that Harrit says the nanothermite wouldn't have been enough to bring down the towers and that a LOT of conventional explosives would have been needed as well. That raises the problem of the lack any pattern of 130 db charges, lack of any pattern of det flashes, lack of any trace of det charges in the seismic record, lack of any destritus of det charges found in the debris, etc. etc.
PoetryHound 6 days ago 2
@PoetryHound What other possible reason could there be that they found nanothermite in the dust?
Couldn't there have been so much nanothermite that they simply didn't need a large amount of other types of explosives?
bluerap04 1 day ago
@bluerap04 According to Harrit himself, a large amount of other explosives WERE needed. And there isn't evidence of such a thing. That was my point.
PoetryHound 1 day ago
@PoetryHound Maybe there isn't. But the thermite was clearly there. So it must be asked..
1) Why is thermite found in all those dust samples, and more importantly, 2) why didn't NIST ever test for thermite, let alone address the matter in their reports?
bluerap04 1 day ago
@PoetryHound Here's just my hypothesis, and I admit I could be wrong (I'm no expert), but maybe the thermite was powerful enough to destroy almost all physical evidence of other explosives. We all saw how much dust there was, and Harrit clearly explains that nanothermite is incredibly powerful.
As far as sound goes, it could be that 1) the use of thermite decreased the normal amount of explosives needed, and 2) there were still plenty of bangs heard: /watch?v=ERhoNYj9_fg
bluerap04 1 day ago
Mr. Harrit certainly appears to be respectable. He seems to know what he is talking about, and he does not appear to be lying. If he is not lying, and not wrong about the presence of nano-thermite in the rubble, it is difficult to believe the official explanation. Of course, there are many other reasons to have real doubt about the official explanation.
In the end this is just one more instance of a government telling lies to motivate its people to go to war. But it still matters.
briteness 6 days ago
Here is a challenge for debunkers: Show us any evidence that Prof. Harrit was not respected by his colleagues BEFORE his 9/11 work.
Skeptic121 1 month ago
people did see strange movement before 911
bushbasher46 1 month ago
Well I always questioned a big fireball coming out of 'just a collapsing building' (the first ever steel made building collapsing because of 'fire'). Great to see that there are some smart people who can prove this indeed:)
MrBorsetti 1 month ago
Great man, we need more intelligent and inquisitive people like him.
Tip of the hat to you sir, well done.
Silverlance988 1 month ago
America is taken over by criminals and people kept as slaves in a big scam, ww.
RP2012
CamillioD 1 month ago 3
@CamillioD Please don't ignore this response people ^^
MrBorsetti 1 month ago
truth seeking citizens be aware of Disinformation Agents working on sabotaging constructive and serious correspondence
YouTube; 'Disinformation Agents'
CamillioD 1 month ago
Unless you have worked in a government funded lab you probably do not know how government grants are awarded in the USA. The decisions are made by a committee called a "study section." It is a common lament among scientists that even ONE enemy on the study section of twenty people or more can utterly destroy a promising career. Questioning anything about 9/11 will make more than one enemy! In academic circles, ANY questioning of 9/11 is considered anti-Semitic, which is the kiss of death.
Skeptic121 1 month ago
"you cannot fuck with this kind of science"...lol
hifeyracer 2 months ago
Thermite=Controlled Demolition=Inside Job!!!!!!!!!
TheKonrad1984 4 months ago
A load of horseshit by a publicity seeking fantasist.
oidunno88 4 months ago
The Truth is slowly coming out! As time goes by, people will open thier eyes and see it.... one day, the Bastards who really did this will be found out, and they will HAVE to pay for what they done! No matter how little they were involved!
WOWayne325 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ExtraExtra.truther911.remember jfk,the patsy,other shooters that were allowed&then patsy gets blame.same with 911.irans ahmadenejad was key4creating final piece of911puzzle.alquada responds to ahmadenejad saying they get credit,not inside job.urika!for11/2years radiocontrolled demoexplosives r planted in3buildings,jewish owner doubles insurance,israelimosad intell knows alqaeda 3hijacks,US operates allow,missle pentagon,iraqwar,patriot act,6wars now,$falls,10years2truth! RonPaul2012save r USA
variablestatus 4 months ago
A lot of people blame Bush for planning the 911 attacks, but I very much doubt they would have involved him, I dont think the criminals that pulled off this well planed operation would risk having someone with that much power to know what was going on because if he back out that would put them in to much risk. Its my belief that Dick Chaney, Rumsfeld were at the top. Bush just got cought up in the politics afterwards, and was pressured to go along most likely through some kind of blackmail
jerryjamify 5 months ago
THIS IS TWO YEARS OLD! HOW HAS EVERYONE AND THEIR GRANDMA NOT SEEN THIS?!?! oh yeah... our media is COMPLETELY CONTROLLED.
imanoutkast 5 months ago
@imanoutkast
Because it was paint, not thermite.
wollclark 4 months ago
@wollclark Hmm, paint sounds like a good answer. Never thought of that. Do paints contain aluminum as well as iron oxide and are suspended in a silicone matrix?
thybigballs 4 months ago
@wollclark LOL.... I'm sorry, does paint turn into liquid iron microspheres when it is ignited? Is paint built from the nano-scale up? Must be some expensive and DANGEROUS paint!! What a ludicrous conspiracy theory.
bjdm3089 3 months ago in playlist Liked
@imanoutkast
And if it is thermite, why won't they let an independent source test them?
wollclark 4 months ago
@wollclark What are you talking about? They are an independent source. And they have let others in the scientific community test them as well. They also have to be extremely careful not to let the evidence be destroyed by giving it to some fake "independent" investigators.
imanoutkast 4 months ago
@imanoutkast
And yet they haven't published their findings in a respectable journal. Their one publishing was in a vanity journal (not peer-reviewed), and published under the nose of the editor who resigned when she found out that such unscientific studies could be published so easily.
wollclark 4 months ago
@wollclark Or maybe she resigned because the paper was proving that the government was lying to the masses, and so she was afraid her position in the community may be jeopardized.
Roonoon2 3 months ago
Yes you'll the translation in the subtitles is correct!
dozesof 6 months ago
Ya know what everyone...... my pantry blew up the other day...cause? a Chocolate cake....we didnt find a chocolate cake but we did find all the ingredients mixed together in the dust.
OtagoMark 7 months ago 2
Very well said, this guy needs to come to England, far too many sheeple here who can't/won't hear the undeniable truth.
solarbeyer 10 months ago
One day soon thanks to the use of supercomputers every sample of dust, and all video footage and audio will be fed in to a supercomputer to reveal and accurately extrapolate every single detail of the events of that day.
These same supercomputers will completely annihilate and dispel all of the lies that were being churned out by the American government.
Technology and science will reveal everything and we will all live to find out the truth and someone is going to have answer to all of us.
Dared2DoIT 1 year ago 9
@Dared2DoIT GREAT NEWS... when can we expect this "supercomputer"
themomentofclarity 1 year ago 4
@themomentofclarity in the year 3000 lol
tamather2647 5 months ago
@themomentofclarity I think he meant that faster computers and better software will allow future skeptics to simulate the collapses of the towers and WTC7 the way NIST did. We will find that it is impossible to simulate the collapses with realistic assumptions. To simulate WTC7, one will have to assume the steel suddenly changed to linguini.
Skeptic121 1 month ago
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
Since WTC 7 was constructed over a Con Ed station, how did the structural framing compensate for the station and how did that influence the collapse?
How much nanothermite did Niels Harrit estimate was used in the supposed controlled demolition of WTC 1, 2, & 7?
If a postcard could survive the Hindenburg inferno isn't it possible for a passport to survive the WTC collapse?
ctcole77 1 month ago
@ctcole77 Con Ed substation: No one complained about the design BEFORE 9/11.
How much thermite? Tons! Bad guys had access. But let's say NIST is right; one column that buckled due to fire brought down the whole building. OK, how much thermite to weaken that one column? Or maybe the thermite just started the diesel fires. The point is, thermite should not have been there. Sulfur should not have been there (see Prof Jonathan Barnett). Plenty of reasons for ARSON investigation!
Skeptic121 1 month ago
@Skeptic121
You might want to do some research.
Niels Harrit "estimated" 10-100 tons of thermite was used, COULD HE BE MORE VAGUE?
Besides, Niels Harrit has admitted thermite would not work unless combined with explosives like TNT. Niels Harrit admits no explosives like TNT were found in his dust.
How about the other questions? Unless you're afraid of the twoof!
911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!
ctcole77 1 month ago
@ctcole77 Sorry, I forgot the last queston: yes, a passport could survive.
Did you read the rest of what I wrote? I suspect ARSON in WTC7.
Why? The work of Prof. Jonathan Barnett. If fire really brought down WTC7, could it have been ARSON? ARSON with thermite? Also known as "high temperature accelerant arson" among arson investigators.
Skeptic121 1 month ago
@ctcole77 (nano) thermite reacts exothermic and therefor just 100gr of dynamite could be used to set the whole place on fire and let some (nano)thermite bombs in action. I surely can't find that 100gr of explosives in several million tons of rubbish ;) You had to do more research I suppose lol
MrBorsetti 1 month ago
@Dared2DoIT I hope the murders are still alive when the truth is revealed. Then again, if they aren't we'll know where they'll be, and it won't be heaven.
cincy2indy 4 months ago
@Dared2DoIT Computers are developed by man and man can permit what data he chooses to sample
crazymonkeyconnor 1 month ago
if jet fuel can melt steal...then all airplanes would melt in mid air. Kerosene and jet fuel burn at the same temperature, and yet kerosene stoves made of steel do not melt. Kerosene and jet fuel burn at around 1000+ degrees...steel melts at 2000+ degrees...and thermite heats to 2500 degrees.
Simple chemistry.
Dared2DoIT 1 year ago 4
@Dared2DoIT Good point, but steel melts at 2800 deg. F, so kerosene and jet fuel are even less suspect as a way to create the tons of molten steel found in the basements of all three WTC bldgs. Huge amounts of nanothermite material have been found in all dust samples from 9/11 that have been tested. Thermite is easily capable of melting steel. Various additives can adjust the temperatures reached in the reaction. Nanothermite can be formed into shaped charges that cut steel explosively.
tetralite123 1 year ago
@tetralite123 That's right. Unignited traces of thermate/thermite were found in dust samples from the 9/11 site. Naturally the US government had all other evidence quickly shipped overseas for recycling.
The question is who or why would do this? I suspect it has to do with the super-secret rich and powerful sub-cultures that were flexing their muscles to show how powerful they are against those who may have chosen to oppose them. Look at whose family was in the buildings before the demolitions.
Dared2DoIT 1 year ago
And the LORD said to me, A conspiracy is found among the men of Judah, and among the inhabitants of Jerusalem.
Jeremiah 11:9
GhostofCliffGullett 1 year ago
Wow, this video should not have so low views, this is kind of a big deal!
mylv87 2 years ago 22
check my song out its called our government
universe23456 2 years ago
wow ! i wonder who placed the termites! omg I hope its not americans ! that is too enormous and monstrous to think abaout!
giggilamour 2 years ago 4
the sad fact about it is that your idea was true the government did such a thing.... if you dont beleive me look up the 9/11 chronicles
tylerminer5 2 years ago 9
@giggilamour Romans burned there own city's and blamed the jews to start wars and laws, history repeats itself,,
MsBiggestpimp 1 year ago
@MsBiggestpimp Hey listen,Bush is a monster ,I would never put anything past him.Dick Cheney is very evil and sinister.So anything is possible!
giggilamour 1 year ago
@giggilamour Bush was just the current placeholder during 9/11. The orders come from the big money banks and corporations who make their biggest profit from funding wars (Cheney works for them). Recent peer-reviewed science has proved beyond a shadow of a doubt (at least to those who understand basic science) that explosives were used in the demolition of the three WTC building on 9/11. Who did it? The suspects are limited by the sheer scale of the tragedy. It takes big money and media control.
tetralite123 1 year ago
@MsBiggestpimp Yup! It's called a "false flag" event and it's the oldest trick in the book for gaining support for a war, starting a war and escalating a war. If 9/11 wasn't an inside job it would be the exception to the rule all throughout history. You attack your own people and blame it on the enemy of your choice. You get instant support from your country's people who are angered and fed lies by the mainstream media.
tetralite123 1 year ago 2
@MsBiggestpimp Where are the Romans when ya need them cuz the jewish/nazi/zionist fuks are doing it now.
shermanr6 7 months ago