I wish he was my physics prof. He explains things very clearly and on top of that he proves his statements by making an experiment. Also, I enjoy how he ends his lectures...what a great teacher.
This particular lecture is a bit of an inspiration to me. I remember the first time I saw it; I saw the monkey execution and thought to myself that THAT is the kind of teacher I want to be.Don't know if I'm even near WL's league, but the students I've had so far do seem to appreciate having basic calculus explained in terms of chasing a mosquito around the room and the need for pinpointing its position exactly in order to shoot it down. Thanks to MIT and Walter Lewin for this!
@JpJangz He has: (Vosinα)^2/g - (Vosinα)^2/2g. The first fraction has a denominator of "g" and the second of "2g" so you multiply the first fraction by 2 to get a common denominator. This gives you 2(Vosinα)^2/2g - (Vosinα)^2/2g. For the numerators, 2(Vosinα)^2 - (Vosinα)^2 = Vosinα^2 ...over 2g denominator.
He did not include Vo because his initial velocity at the point of origin was 0.
On the monkey in the tree and the hunter, all in the freefall elevator... if the elevator has already been accelerating before the shot is fired, will the results be the same as if the elevator begins freefall at the time the shot is fired?
My Physics I professor was terrible - we would sit at his desk and mumble to himself for two hours straight. I passed my super difficult Mechanics exam thanks to MIT's brilliant lectures. :) MIT, thank you so much for uploading this.
Does anybody know if it is actually physically possible for a bullet, that has been shot up in the air, to come down with enough force to kill someone if the average bullet travels 817 feet per second?
he is best he is the first one who really make physics look practical. i wish this kind of teaching methodoligies could be followed in our country too.(india)
Wow, I have never seen a professor this enthusiastic about what he teaches. For a second there, I actually believed there was a monkey back there. LOL.
@katanakio That's the room in which this class took place. The building is 26, and the room is 100, so it's 26-100. MIT buildings are almost always referred to by a number instead of a name, and the numbers grow as you move out from the Infinite Corridor. When you are North, an "N" gets added to the number (as in N42). Northeast becomes "NE," etc. It can be very confusing to a person new to the MIT campus, but once you learn the system, you can find any building without checking a map.
I wish if i could get a chance to study from him i could really have done wonders with him around. He's the best teacher I've ever seen in my life.God give him long life :)
I am truly surprised how many MIT students raised their hand for the same time when the question was asked between the time of a parabolic path launched with a uniform velocity from 30 and 60 degrees.
damn iit.... u people get to iit without understanding any concepts... only problem splving is done... u people dont get the basics right.there is no demos done in india... but, in mit, this genius explains so beautifully that u get ur basics right.. how many people have got noble price studng in america(mit) and how many in iit.. so dont even compare ur plus 1 with wat is taught here..
You say "we are all taught this in plus 1"... but sorry tard, in India only the top 15% of students even reach high school, never mind how many graduate. In the US, 85% graduate high school. So, you're being a douche because the top 15% of your country learns things a year or two before the entire population of the US? Judging by your misspelled retarded post, I assume you must be an Indian supergenius, relative to the rest of the country.
haha you fuckin suck. I graduate from HS and Physics AP here is a fucking joke... Yeah 85% of the students graduate from HS but most of them are dumb as fuck
you people really don't get it do you? Every(good) college course requires NO prerequisite knowledge. This way you can build everything up your way. If you're a good teacher than the student gets the whole picture. If you're a bad teacher, you require alot of material and so you don't explain everything all the time.
Yeah u learn how to speak in kindergarden or wherever and than you have debate team where you do the same think. (hope there are debate teams in US cos its like in every movie:)
Unfortunately physics is not required for graduation in all (maybe any) US high schools. Heck, I don't think that even geometry or algebra are. US primary and secondary education are pretty pathetic.
When I entered RPI back in 1964, high school physics, chemistry and calculus were required courses for all applicants to the Engineering and Science schools. That appears not to be the case any more.
I disagree, Just because calculus is not required doesn't mean the schools are poor, Average and below average students can not learn calculus and physics in a functional time period. So, putting them in the classes would only slow down those who may indeed become real engineers and scientists.
u can learn it in 11th grade in america too..some people do...they get AP credit..and skip this course in highschool...other people take it...in high school..still..want to learn it again and take it in college...some people don't take it in high school..and take it for the first time in college...so...it all pretty much depends...i'm sure these students at MIT were just taking it again...to make sure they got all of the basical fundamentals down...
That is why american educational system is so confusing...
In Portugal, if you choose Science in Highschool you must have Math and 2 of these 3 Subjects (Physics, Biology and Descritive Geometry). And if you want to study Engennering you MUST have Physics
I am learning this because of an interest in physics, not because of my school or anything. I'm not quite in 11th grade yet, but I'm taking physics when school starts. (considering that it is the Summer here)
I wish I lived in Portugal though, I get bored of the simplicity of what I am learning right now...
Thing is, this is like an AP course in high school. Although he does go through it quicker, and with more detail, the curriculum is about the same. The course in the US, atleast in NY state is called AP Physics B (without Calc.) and I am currently taking it in 10th, although it's generally taken in 11th or 12th grade. So while it's not terribly advanced, it makes sense that a freshman college class would "review" this curriculum.
It is important to keep re-doing the basics (obviously at a faster pace) as basics are important foundations that you must grasp well, before you can build your more advanced concepts on top of it. So do not look down on basic concepts. Arrogance will only bound you for overconfidence and then failure.
Ok I learned mechanics in what seemed to be a beginner's course. It was the highest level at my (crappy) university. I'm transferring next semester to a killer physics department. Do you think I should pick up like Goldstein's or Symon's text or something to that effect and read it during next semester's work? Any suggestions for some good texts?
@thejugglenaut91: The answer requires a question. It is possible that there is a big gap to cover? Which text did you use in your last program? Fundamentals of Physics (Vol 1) by Resnick is a very good intermediate text. This is how I usually approach these problems: I go into a well stocked library and take a lot of time - hours - flipping through books and I eventually emerge with a tille or at most two that I feel comfortable reading and that I feel give me the concepts. The math later.
does anyone know how to detemine the sign of g relative to the value given to g as a function of y? in other words, if g is positive in the positive y direction, is the sign positive or negative for g in the equation for y's position/velocity?
Not sure what u mean by "the sign of g". g's the magnitude of a force. Magnitudes are never negative. The sign you place in front of g in a given eq depends on the situation you're measuring. For time to apex, the eq obviously must yield a non-negative value. Set v(final)=0 and the eq is v(i)*sin(a)=g*t. Substituting -9.8 for g will give you a negative time for a>0, so you see why g isn't neg. For apex height, substitute v(i) with dy/dt, multiply both sides by dt and integrate accordingly.
Though I still say g is a magnitude and always positive. Using g as a vector involves giving it a direction and the common pitfall then is to substitute g in an equation with the number -9.8. The easiest way to think of it is that a is a vector and g its magnitude. An example is is freefall in a vacuum with 0 initial velocity. Without calculus the equation is v(t) = a*t. The acceleration is regarded as downward so the eq becomes v(t) = -g*t.
This lecture is awesome, I understood it while it was being explained so clearly, I don't know about others but I'll definitely need to come back to this lecture a couple of times for a revision to be able to do these problems on my own
I wish this guy was my physics prof :(.
donaldinasweater 2 days ago
Not only is this lecture informative, it's also entertaining.
SmokeDankTrees 3 days ago
I am very happy to see the vidoe from you, hopefully the others also are happy for You 3D Kinematics - Free Falling Reference Frames
NganaJHone 2 weeks ago
Steady I Really Like This Video 3D Kinematics Free Falling Reference Frames
Ondelendo 2 weeks ago
Good, I like that you share this video, I wish success always 3D Kinematics - Free Falling Reference Frames
bebeheuy 2 weeks ago
Nice Video 3D Kinematics - Free Falling Reference Frames That You Share , So Very Nice Thanks You
willamricard 2 weeks ago
I Really Like The Video From Your 3D Kinematics Free Falling Reference Frames
imegatrone 2 weeks ago
Your Video 3D Kinematics - Free Falling Reference Frames Is Very Useful Sharing
bundawartini 2 weeks ago
after i watched this video 3D Kinematics - Free Falling Reference Frames, my insight is very open because the video is very good to give information
anakmudajaman 2 weeks ago 2
SUPERB, I FEEL PHYSICS IN ME,NIGHTMARES OF CLASSICAL MECHANICS AT NIGHT AND........MUCH MORE
MrKonshias 1 month ago
He is just too awesome; I can't handle it!
mdiem 2 months ago in playlist MIT 8.01 Physics I: Classical Mechanics, Fall 1999
Love how he changes the angle to 30 degrees at the 30 minute mark (plus or minus 30 seconds because no measurement is valid without an uncertainty!)
ThunderKid 3 months ago
I never thought I'd laugh so hard on a Physics Class
Martcapt 3 months ago
Thanks for These.
mdgreg 3 months ago in playlist mdgreg's favorites
Sir thank you alot, you good teacher, i can understanding you very clear . Thanks again
ssoo1982 3 months ago
after seeing these videos i got interest i physics
sahil89424 4 months ago 3
I wish he was my physics prof. He explains things very clearly and on top of that he proves his statements by making an experiment. Also, I enjoy how he ends his lectures...what a great teacher.
SmokeDankTrees 4 months ago in playlist MIT 8.01 Physics I: Classical Mechanics, Fall 1999 3
This particular lecture is a bit of an inspiration to me. I remember the first time I saw it; I saw the monkey execution and thought to myself that THAT is the kind of teacher I want to be.Don't know if I'm even near WL's league, but the students I've had so far do seem to appreciate having basic calculus explained in terms of chasing a mosquito around the room and the need for pinpointing its position exactly in order to shoot it down. Thanks to MIT and Walter Lewin for this!
Scurmicurv 4 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
hi sorry, but @7:14, i realize that when they are added up, it became v zero Sin alpha over 2g, whereby how do you do that?
And one more thing is that, since he took formula 3, why didn't him include V zero which is the first portion of the equation
Sorry...i am picking things up as a noob T.T
JpJangz 5 months ago
hi sorry, but @7:14, i realize that when they are added up, it became v zero Sin alpha over 2g, whereby how do you do that?
And one more thing is that, since he took formula 3, why didn't him include V zero which is the first portion of the equation
Sorry...i am picking things up as a noob T.T
JpJangz 5 months ago
@JpJangz He has: (Vosinα)^2/g - (Vosinα)^2/2g. The first fraction has a denominator of "g" and the second of "2g" so you multiply the first fraction by 2 to get a common denominator. This gives you 2(Vosinα)^2/2g - (Vosinα)^2/2g. For the numerators, 2(Vosinα)^2 - (Vosinα)^2 = Vosinα^2 ...over 2g denominator.
He did not include Vo because his initial velocity at the point of origin was 0.
cheeri0os 3 months ago
"In high school you would say it's supposed to land there, bull man!"
unknownPLfan 6 months ago
On the monkey in the tree and the hunter, all in the freefall elevator... if the elevator has already been accelerating before the shot is fired, will the results be the same as if the elevator begins freefall at the time the shot is fired?
Xonk61 6 months ago in playlist Walter Lewin Lectures
Gr8 lecture:D thx MIT!
anmoljawandha 7 months ago
Gr8 lecture:D thx MIT!
anmoljawandha 7 months ago
I love the epicness of the monkey getting hit in the nuts at the end. lol *slow-mo* *RUMBLE-RUMBLE!*
EJNewbury 8 months ago
My Physics I professor was terrible - we would sit at his desk and mumble to himself for two hours straight. I passed my super difficult Mechanics exam thanks to MIT's brilliant lectures. :) MIT, thank you so much for uploading this.
roarintheforest 8 months ago
Prof. Walter Lewin, you are a legend.
RIP Monkey :(
adnanisar 8 months ago
in my country i see this in Highschool :p easy shit.
6618594 9 months ago
I'm doing Year 12 Physics in Australia for my VCE this year, and this all makes sense! It would so awesome if I could study at MIT in the future.
CRISNCHIPS12398 9 months ago
He explains it so well. These are the best physics videos I've seen yet so far.
hizay 9 months ago
No animals were harmed in the making of this film.
ac7491 10 months ago
I actually enjoyed watching this lecture. Very helpful! Who knew Physics could be this interesting! O.o
0WhosthatGiRL9 10 months ago
Does anybody know if it is actually physically possible for a bullet, that has been shot up in the air, to come down with enough force to kill someone if the average bullet travels 817 feet per second?
MrLOKILLO15 10 months ago
@MrLOKILLO15 Ignoring air resistance it will hit the ground at 817 feet per second
SoNDgs 9 months ago
@SoNDgs Ok thanks for the help.
MrLOKILLO15 9 months ago
@MrLOKILLO15 busted by the mythbusters
sssss3841 8 months ago
science is cruel....but neccesary; poor robert
maxauto44e 11 months ago
I like his sandals.
MrDogbert2 11 months ago 3
he is best he is the first one who really make physics look practical. i wish this kind of teaching methodoligies could be followed in our country too.(india)
pankaj51281 1 year ago
great lecture!
shemcristobal 1 year ago
Wow, I have never seen a professor this enthusiastic about what he teaches. For a second there, I actually believed there was a monkey back there. LOL.
HunterDX77M 1 year ago 2
Robert got hit in the balls...
arsenelupin123 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
'I don't go on monkey hunts too often, but when I do it, I'd like to do it with style'. Utter class.
M412c1n 1 year ago
Comment removed
M412c1n 1 year ago
Thanks MIT for the OCW , by the way , what's 26100 ? he ( Walter Lewin ) sometimes mentions
katanakio 1 year ago 10
@katanakio That's the room in which this class took place. The building is 26, and the room is 100, so it's 26-100. MIT buildings are almost always referred to by a number instead of a name, and the numbers grow as you move out from the Infinite Corridor. When you are North, an "N" gets added to the number (as in N42). Northeast becomes "NE," etc. It can be very confusing to a person new to the MIT campus, but once you learn the system, you can find any building without checking a map.
MIT 1 year ago 13
@katanakio HALL OF PHYSICS IN mit HAS THIS NAME !
zuchchi 1 year ago
Thanks MIT for the OCW , by the way , what's 26100 ? he ( Walter Lewin ) sometimes mentions
katanakio 1 year ago
hahah i love how they slow-mo-ed it
jbabe521 1 year ago
LOL he told that guy at 34: 35 to " BE A MAN " he was scared
afghanplayr20 1 year ago
Y is it that no one asks questions ? are they allowed to ask questions in MIT ?
afghanplayr20 1 year ago
these videos are simply amazing, a godsend. perfect for my ap class.
i can only hope i have professors like this when i get to college.
xoxosparkle 1 year ago
Comment removed
thecomanche1 1 year ago
@thecomanche1 because that isn't the equation.
pfat0 1 year ago
I wish if i could get a chance to study from him i could really have done wonders with him around. He's the best teacher I've ever seen in my life.God give him long life :)
mridularul1 1 year ago
"WOAHH!! JACKPOT!!" Best lecturers around!
danrayson 1 year ago 5
lol, slow motion
andreirocks1992 1 year ago
I am truly surprised how many MIT students raised their hand for the same time when the question was asked between the time of a parabolic path launched with a uniform velocity from 30 and 60 degrees.
bloomingdedalus 1 year ago
and what was the uncertainty for the 6.14 meters he measured ? *gg+
Cabuncle 1 year ago
Is it just me or did the ball hit the monkey in the balls?
Taowhr 1 year ago
these comments are serious business
TGMRobotSanta 2 years ago
dont mean to hurt..but we are taught all this in plus 1..before we get to coll..Im in IIT and in all collgs this is like prerequisite
sonchand19 2 years ago
damn iit.... u people get to iit without understanding any concepts... only problem splving is done... u people dont get the basics right.there is no demos done in india... but, in mit, this genius explains so beautifully that u get ur basics right.. how many people have got noble price studng in america(mit) and how many in iit.. so dont even compare ur plus 1 with wat is taught here..
ab501lara 2 years ago
Don't they do revisions? Its important to do revisions so your foundations are strong. Don't be too confident.
labitx 2 years ago
You say "we are all taught this in plus 1"... but sorry tard, in India only the top 15% of students even reach high school, never mind how many graduate. In the US, 85% graduate high school. So, you're being a douche because the top 15% of your country learns things a year or two before the entire population of the US? Judging by your misspelled retarded post, I assume you must be an Indian supergenius, relative to the rest of the country.
GradiusCVK 2 years ago
haha you fuckin suck. I graduate from HS and Physics AP here is a fucking joke... Yeah 85% of the students graduate from HS but most of them are dumb as fuck
Dual1ty 1 year ago
you people really don't get it do you? Every(good) college course requires NO prerequisite knowledge. This way you can build everything up your way. If you're a good teacher than the student gets the whole picture. If you're a bad teacher, you require alot of material and so you don't explain everything all the time.
thejugglenaut91 1 year ago
"it always happens with robert" hahahaha
19cohen 2 years ago
i could listen to the man lecture all day, he's wonderful
weweallthewayhome 2 years ago 5
"oh, my calculator was off. That's a detail."
this man is a genius
loooools
XD
Kritarrista89 2 years ago
A question to all americans here:
Do you learn this in college? Because here in Portugal we learn this in our 11th grade (2 years before college)
death2art 2 years ago
Yeah I'm sure MIT is like another Portugal highschool....just think about it man....
gaucable 2 years ago 4
I know MIT is much better than a Portuguese highschool, but i am serious. They teach this in the 11th grade here...
death2art 2 years ago
Yeah u learn how to speak in kindergarden or wherever and than you have debate team where you do the same think. (hope there are debate teams in US cos its like in every movie:)
gaucable 2 years ago
Unfortunately physics is not required for graduation in all (maybe any) US high schools. Heck, I don't think that even geometry or algebra are. US primary and secondary education are pretty pathetic.
When I entered RPI back in 1964, high school physics, chemistry and calculus were required courses for all applicants to the Engineering and Science schools. That appears not to be the case any more.
ctcboater 2 years ago
I disagree, Just because calculus is not required doesn't mean the schools are poor, Average and below average students can not learn calculus and physics in a functional time period. So, putting them in the classes would only slow down those who may indeed become real engineers and scientists.
TIGERSDFW 2 years ago
u can learn it in 11th grade in america too..some people do...they get AP credit..and skip this course in highschool...other people take it...in high school..still..want to learn it again and take it in college...some people don't take it in high school..and take it for the first time in college...so...it all pretty much depends...i'm sure these students at MIT were just taking it again...to make sure they got all of the basical fundamentals down...
KingFinger69 2 years ago
That is why american educational system is so confusing...
In Portugal, if you choose Science in Highschool you must have Math and 2 of these 3 Subjects (Physics, Biology and Descritive Geometry). And if you want to study Engennering you MUST have Physics
death2art 2 years ago
I am learning this because of an interest in physics, not because of my school or anything. I'm not quite in 11th grade yet, but I'm taking physics when school starts. (considering that it is the Summer here)
I wish I lived in Portugal though, I get bored of the simplicity of what I am learning right now...
Camisho 2 years ago
why do you wish to live in Portugal?
CanisLupus1987 2 years ago
Well It doesn't have to be Portugal, any place with harder educational standards would be nice..
Camisho 2 years ago
I know what you mean, but it all depend on you, pick up some books, start learning for your self, realise that education sometimes hold you down.
MarijnStevens 2 years ago
Normally, this would be a 12th grade class for an advanced high school student,
TIGERSDFW 2 years ago
Yeah but i guess they have to do this revision... At least he goes through that fast
lorent123 2 years ago
@TIGERSDFW
Thing is, this is like an AP course in high school. Although he does go through it quicker, and with more detail, the curriculum is about the same. The course in the US, atleast in NY state is called AP Physics B (without Calc.) and I am currently taking it in 10th, although it's generally taken in 11th or 12th grade. So while it's not terribly advanced, it makes sense that a freshman college class would "review" this curriculum.
Kosha2905 2 years ago
It is important to keep re-doing the basics (obviously at a faster pace) as basics are important foundations that you must grasp well, before you can build your more advanced concepts on top of it. So do not look down on basic concepts. Arrogance will only bound you for overconfidence and then failure.
labitx 2 years ago 7
you have hit the nail on the head i forgot the basics and now im in a hole whith little chance of escape
matharoofmaths 2 years ago
Ok I learned mechanics in what seemed to be a beginner's course. It was the highest level at my (crappy) university. I'm transferring next semester to a killer physics department. Do you think I should pick up like Goldstein's or Symon's text or something to that effect and read it during next semester's work? Any suggestions for some good texts?
thejugglenaut91 1 year ago
@thejugglenaut91: The answer requires a question. It is possible that there is a big gap to cover? Which text did you use in your last program? Fundamentals of Physics (Vol 1) by Resnick is a very good intermediate text. This is how I usually approach these problems: I go into a well stocked library and take a lot of time - hours - flipping through books and I eventually emerge with a tille or at most two that I feel comfortable reading and that I feel give me the concepts. The math later.
jpaultel 1 year ago
poor monkey
mmmmmmmmmo 2 years ago
the x-component of the projectile motion doesn't accelerate if you neglect the air resistance (and possibly other resistance)
horntail140 2 years ago
Right, but who said it does?
opiumgland 2 years ago
46:44
agraver 2 years ago
Wow, a monkey! I've did this demonstration a few times myself but never had the idea of this kind of stuff like little monkey pal :D
WSA10 2 years ago
does anyone know how to detemine the sign of g relative to the value given to g as a function of y? in other words, if g is positive in the positive y direction, is the sign positive or negative for g in the equation for y's position/velocity?
recyclingismylife 2 years ago
Not sure what u mean by "the sign of g". g's the magnitude of a force. Magnitudes are never negative. The sign you place in front of g in a given eq depends on the situation you're measuring. For time to apex, the eq obviously must yield a non-negative value. Set v(final)=0 and the eq is v(i)*sin(a)=g*t. Substituting -9.8 for g will give you a negative time for a>0, so you see why g isn't neg. For apex height, substitute v(i) with dy/dt, multiply both sides by dt and integrate accordingly.
opiumgland 2 years ago
g isn't a force. Is an acceleration, it is a vector, and its sign depends on where do you choose your positive axes pointing to.
corneliaomir 2 years ago
Wow what the hell was I smoking 2 months ago? hanks c.
opiumgland 2 years ago
Though I still say g is a magnitude and always positive. Using g as a vector involves giving it a direction and the common pitfall then is to substitute g in an equation with the number -9.8. The easiest way to think of it is that a is a vector and g its magnitude. An example is is freefall in a vacuum with 0 initial velocity. Without calculus the equation is v(t) = a*t. The acceleration is regarded as downward so the eq becomes v(t) = -g*t.
opiumgland 2 years ago
Epic Monkey expirement.
vadimgrin 2 years ago 3
Отличный профессор, плохо, что у нас таких профессоров практически нет, пусть пример берут!!
akabyl 2 years ago
this was awesome
prateekkurkanji 2 years ago
This lecture is awesome, I understood it while it was being explained so clearly, I don't know about others but I'll definitely need to come back to this lecture a couple of times for a revision to be able to do these problems on my own
prashantparikh 2 years ago 30
La física es expectacular.
jhonma1 2 years ago 3
This guy is really good at what he does. This is of course due the demonstration after the lecture.
PHYSICS WORKS!
gamefreak759 2 years ago 26
Physics is all about understanding I am currently going to school to get my physics degree Thanks for whomever posted it and I want to say thank you
sbarber317 3 years ago 3
Hi Im the student of KARACHI University, I found this very well explained. An energetic teacher
lamugr8 3 years ago
Awesome. No doubt.
moon22666 3 years ago 4
this is soooo cool!! man, physics is awesome! but poor robert. ^^
iluvjiyongx3 3 years ago 2
good teacher~~
iluvjiyongx3 3 years ago 3
wittly practical! Mr. Lewis is funny
hangrry 3 years ago 3
Agreed! Btw It is Walter Lewin not Lewis =)
newyorkairlines 3 years ago 4
Awesome!!!
Rodrigofelipe777 3 years ago 3
this lecture was awesome!!
Those demonstrations are really cool too. You can actually SEE what he is talking about :D
cruxis7856 3 years ago 2
lol
TEAMELFA 3 years ago 2
Fascinating lecture
chadwickneutron 3 years ago 2
Robert!!!! Nooooooo!!!!!!
2Plankah 3 years ago 6