Added: 2 years ago
From: jeppeps3360
Views: 52,468
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (110)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @mikeyzlatkin

    So.. You mean is easier to play on a console than in a computer?..

  • needs anti aliasing

  • Actually, consoles might not have the best graphics, but they do hve the best gameplay.

  • but with consoles you don't have to worry about compability and if your not on a huge budget, updating ur pc is a real wallet-killer

  • where are the PC clips?..guess they didnt want the consoles to look bad in comparison or something?

  • Crytek lie on everything ! ... Crysis 2 is deciving !

  • 0:39 in crysis 2 the buildings don't get damaged, they just get a bit darker... fail

  • Lol @ ps3 fanboys

  • watch the difference between the ps3 explosions and the 360 explosions....way more detail (including spark like shrapnel on the ps3) 2:26

  • A few things:

    Can't we just say that they all look good? Both the PS3 and the 360 are looking pretty damn good for their dated hardware. (The fact they they could get complete REAL-TIME on a 7800GTX/1950XT (PS3/360 GPU equiv.) is saying something.

    Also, I read that Crysis 2 for PC is going to be DX 11, but they said that they were in the process of "experimenting" with Hardware Tessellation and displacement maps. (Man, that would be SICK if they could incorporate tessellation.) Google it. =D

  • Me: TURN UP THE AA

    Xbox 720: Ok IN A COUPLE YEARS MWUAHAHAHAH

  • Crysis 2 for consoles look shit compared to Uncharted 2 and 3

  • @tazss159 like ur face..crysis 1 can rape unfarted series..let see dude...who has better graphics..unfarted 3 or crysis 2

  • @ableman8 LOL Crysis 2 even shit looks better then that, DUMBASS PS3 games from first party exclusive developers like Guerilla Games and Naughty Dog will have their own custom AA equivelant to 16XAA :) Not to mention consoles not only have superior artistic style but the gap between the graphics is nothing significant if not better :) Too bad Crytek don't know how to tap into the power of the CELL !!!!! Maybe cause of shitbox 360's snail slow cpu.

    I'm not a fanboy either I own a $5000 PC.

  • @tazss159 dude i own all three things..its been like 13 years now and i have played every game in these years...i also make games..and just after my course i am heading over to germany for getting in gaming industry...i have compared ps3, sex box 360 and pc...the worst is xbox..why?..because xbox has a old prossecor and has 3 symmetrical cores running at 3.2 GHz each where as ps3 has 7 cores @3.2GHz..make the difference...ps3 has blu ray which enables tohave textures upto 60 gb COMMENT CONTINUES

  • @tazss159 CONTINUED--and xbox has custom ati 700mhz processor whereas ps3 has nvidea rsx X 2 each supporting 550mhz....xbox is coming to an end man...its over for it..now there will be ps3 and pc..i have a $7200 pc and i still play crysis ..why? because still even the best gpu on planet cannot run crysis upto 120 frames..whereas a guy modded uncharted for pc and it took out about 300 frames..why? becasue uncharted and killzone has small mapped textures and crysis 1 .....COMMENT CONTINUED...

  • @tazss159 crysis 1 only has upto 512 mb of object textures..thats why even beast pc's cant run it properly..the first thing that comes to our mind when we benchmark a gpu is..can it run crysis ?..why..man search out the best graphics game on planet..answer will be crysis...why not uncharted and killzone even though they look brilliant..? because the guys who check game details and graphics ..also me...see that kz3 and uncharted 2 had less detailed textures compared to crysis...COMMENT CONTINUES.

  • @ableman8 LMAO GUYS TAKE A LOOK AT THE CRYSIS FANBOY OVER HERE.AHAHA 3 PARAGRAPHS STATING WHY CRYSIS IS BETTER AHAHAHA! LMAO CRYSIS JUST HAS GOOD GRAPHICS THATS ALL GAMEPLAY IS BORING AS SINGING A LALABY

  • @tazss159 CONTINUED thats because pc can support anything..and dude..consoles are nothing but compressed pc's....i loved playing all games..on no matter which console...but if u compare graphics crysis is the first name..and crysis 2..? it can be the best game ever..why? because it will take full potential of ps3,x-box and pc..and delivers dx 11 upto 32XAA on pc..limited to consoles..and crytek have techniques dude..they put all power to the things visible to u to deliver worlds best graphics:D

  • @tazss159 CONCLUSION------u r a dooshebag and a crytek hater..but this planet owes crytek for making the best graphic game ever...with crysis other companies like nauthy dog and gurilla games could learn how to embbed and bounce light..rather than faking it..

    IF U R A TRUE GAMER ...U WILL UNDERSTAND WATEVER I WROTE..

    PEACE OUT!!ENJOY

  • @ableman8 What ? New PS3 games like KZ3 looks miless better than crysis. Crysis looks like shit except for the foliage since crytek has good foliage algorithms. You'r previous statement didn't make any sense since it was just based on pure fanboysim. Crytek doesn't know how to work the Cell ok, obviously there not using the PS3 as the lead platform, PS3/360 version will look same cause Crytek will port from shitbox 360 to PS3. Comment continued.

  • Comment removed

  • @ableman8 - Comment Continued.

    Cell was made by IBM, IBM is known to make ultra high performance ( super computer chips ) chips way ahead of their time, for instance back in 2003 IBM already had a tripple core at 3.2 GHz. Now Sony invested $400 Million into this chip being made by IBM in 2005, which it is indeed still good today, if the PPE is used as a controller efficently those SPE's can act as cores which is what Naughty Dog did. Just watch as new PS3 games out dude :)

  • @tazss159 right man...ibm are way ahead but way expensive .... i just told u that cry engine 3 is also way ahead of time unlike naughty dog...i like naughty dog because of uncharted,crash bandicoot series..but they just deliver small maps with good graphics....whereas crytek gives u sandbox..learge maps and realtime awesome graphics...u can urself see that crysis has better graphics...the whole world is not mad that it unkwoingly made crysis the best graphics game..its deserved it..it achived it

  • @ableman8 Yea Sony invested 400 Million just for the Cell from IBM but indeed it was worth it since new PS3 games are looking mind boggling, have you seen the water effects and character models in Killzone 3 !!!!! OMG it looks jaw dropping! Visually I think Killzone and Uncharted series blow Crysis out of the water, trust me Crytek doesn't know the right code to efficently use the Cell, Hell Naughty Dog ( one of the best developers ) couldn't max out the Cell. Crysis 2 wont be impressive for PS3

  • @tazss159 crysis 2 will be better than kilzone 3 and uncharted 3 ....,man..with all faith i bet my life on it..:(((..u r bad..:((..people liked crysis 2 story soo much that now there will be a novel on it.....u wont ever agree with me..soo i will never reply to u.,goodbye

  • @tazss159

    " have you seen the water effects and character models in Killzone 3" Yeah, they're from 2005 just like the cell, there is no way to get around that. Sure they take full advantage of what that 2005 tech can offer which many console developers are too lazy to do, but from 2005 none the less.

    Sorry, no matter how much you want to believe what you say. Reality will continue to disagree.

    " Crysis 2 wont be impressive for PS3" you're right with the cut down engine the ps3 has to use.

  • @manhunt48 Wrong. Don't you know that console hardware has a lot of investment and consideration put into their hardware to make them ahead of their time if not way ahead. They're not from 2005, no PC from 2005 can run it that good. Plus there's just so much you can do with the PS3 hardware. Have you seen U2 ! You'r jaw'll hit the floor. And what's even more amazing is it doesn't even max out the PS3. It's just about using the hardware efficently in newer ways.

  • @tazss159

    Yeah there is alot of investment, to get value for money. . . Not future proofing it.

    For instance, just take the GPU 500 MHz ATI Xenos (xbox) or the nVidia RSX @ 550 MHz (ps3). . . On release both disgustingly outdated.

    Yes i've played U2, like i said. . . 2005.

    There's so much you can do with any hardware. . . that's no argument for the ps3. . .

    So like i said, 2005 tech, will ALWAYS be 2005 tech. . . no matter how much you tell yourself its not, that will not change reality.

  • @tazss159 still 6 year old technology,and thei starting to show their age in a pretty significant way,Crysis 2 will define THE high water mark of where consoles can go graphically..here but no further..time for a new gen..but some suit decided this generation gets to live for another half a decade.. rail shooters that looks the same for 5 years..oh dread..lets hope someone new comes along...

  • @KINGKENNYTHEHOLY Crysis 2 will set the benchmark for Shitbox 360, not PS3 or PC, since Crysis 1 is still PC's flagship and Crysis 2 for the PS3 is just a shit port owned by Killzone 3.

  • @tazss159 Ok, Uncharted can not even be compared to Crysis. I happen to know because I own both a BEAST gaming rig with Crysis Maximum edition and a PS3 with Uncharted 2 and the if the quality of the graphics of Uncharted 2 were ported to PC than the PC community would all declare the game half-assed.

  • Games that end up on all platforms (PC and consoles) tend to be linear... Crysis 1 was very open, I hope Crysis 2 will be also.

  • ...crysis 2 is so strong that even with the anti-aliansing so low it's lag in console...

  • can we all agree that every gaming system, for the expetion of the WII (wich failed epicly) are good for different types of things

  • I don't mean Gears Of War 3, i mean God Of War 3 ._. Now, let the trollfest start... ¬¬

  • Please let this game be fun! The first one wasn't, and not all the graphics in the world will make up to gameplay

  • still look unreal to me.

  • This is one year ago. I wonder how much they've accomplished since then.

  • wow ps3 looks SSSOOOOOOOOO much better!

  • looks worse then cryengine2...

  • lol its spiking

  • Yeah its official.

    "We managed to get more out from playstation 3 than from 360."

    Thats what the developers of this game stated a couple weeks ago.

  • i hope pc gfx are better than this shit...

  • all i gotta say is graphics are SERIOUS these days

  • why didn't they put anti aliasing in...ps3 can run atleast 2X! oh well. i did notice the colour detail get better when it switches to ps3.

  • lol i remember when the trees was flying up to sky when you shoot them , at 1:29 - maybe now it wont happen

  • i hope they make modern warfare 3 with cry engine 3 so that we can see price's kick ass mustache in awesome graphics lololololololololol

  • someone help, i got an MSI am2 socket motherboard and i recently ordered a XFX Radeon 5770 graphicscard oh and i also ordered Crysis, can i play crysis in very high settings or do i have to upgrage my motherboard to an AM2/Am3 socket?

  • It's so damn ugly without AA. (1:44)

  • I just hope there are dargons to slay on the games that will use this engine.

  • I have a nice 1080p HD TV and both a 360 and PS3. They're both hooked up via HDMI cables. I used to think they looked so amazing and each was different from eachother but now I play gaming pc: dual nvidia gtx285's, core i7 @ 3.51ghz, 6gb DDR3 ram, 1080p monitor. Well now my ps3 and 360 BOTH equally gather dust. You ask why? Well after playing all same games as on consoles and other games on my pc, crysis and crysis warhead, in FULL settings, I see CONSOLES ARE SHIT IN ALL WAYS COMPARED TO PC :)

  • same here, but I have no idea where you get "all same games as on consoles" from. Games are released on consoles earlier, and there are more console exclusive games. Bringing up Crysis is also weird because to me it is not nearly as fun as other pc games...if consoles are shit, Crysis is shit.

  • @jeppeps3360

    I just meant in general ive played games on consoles and on my pc to see the difference in maximum settings and such. No crysis isn't my favorite the entire half life saga is. Valve is best in my opinion, 2k running close with bioshock. I only stated this opinion because so often I hear: "dude consoles look better. pc's are more expensive and look no better.."

  • yh I see your point, I care more for the RTS games on pc though and as you say valve is one of the best (along with Blizzard imo) and to play Left 4 Dead or the orange box on 360 is just painful...

  • @jeppeps3360 As a pc gamer all my life and a modder, mapper...etc I gotta say has the world lost it's taste completely, "COD", "PS3"?

    Valve and Blizzard are the best because they make every game with care, Valve's Modding community is the best, They make very atmospheric mods full of storyline.

    Anyways, if You care more about gameplay, 2D art (WICHH MEANS painted by artist, not engine) You guys should try the classics Alone In the Dark 1-3, Supaplex, Duke Nukem, Goblins 1-3, Starcraft, CS 1.5.

  • @Masterfootballer23 Other incredible games but really not famous enough You could say underground games include Blood1,2 (BASED ON DUKE NUKEM ENGINE HAS THE BEST MOST INCREDIBLE WEAPONS LIKE A VOODOO DOLL AND TRAPPED SOUL!!!!) Stalker (GREAT ATMOSPHERE), Cossacks, Cossacks Art of WAR, Cossacks: Back To War (ONE OF THE BEST STRATEGY GAMES OF ALL TIME, VERY POPULAR IN EUROPE BUT NOT DISTRIBUTED IN NORTH AMERICA),

  • @Masterfootballer23 PS if You live in US maybe that's why Console games are released first, well not in europe.

  • @j69572 2k is a publisher, not a developer.

  • @jeppeps3360 low. fail.. you realize what you just said? god.. on PC you can play ALL games no matter xboxs or ps's . lol idiot, you just hate crysis cause your cosole cant handle it... Crysis is the most realitic game and nothing will top it.. 

  • @j69572 well if you think that cool graphics is most important aspect in video games then yes consoles are pretty shit

  • @j69572 well if you wanna spend 1500 dollars on a pc ill stick to my ps3

  • The cryengine 3 dont have any anti-aliasing... looks nice but at the same time horrible

  • consoles barely have antialiasing, I think the 360 can pull off up to 2x aa and ps3...probably less, but done right it can look better than 360 anyway.

  • 360 hardware

    the 360 has 4x AA on any game on it

    even if the developers dont put any in

    its what ATI did

  • @jeppeps3360 GOW 3 Have 16xMSAA, That was done right :D

  • @jeppeps3360 lol i have it at 8x! PC rocks

  • if crytek developed cryengine3 for the ps3

    this would be a whole other game lol

  • yh I prefer ps3 too...and obviously ps3s first party exclusives looks better than anything on 360...but crysis will probably look about the same on both ps3 and 360 (not because the 360 is more powerful or equal to the ps3, but because the developers can't use the ps3)

  • Why are people saying it looks like Crysis on Medium?! Show me a vid on Medium with God Rays!

    Not to mention your confusing a Wip ENGINE compared to a Full-Blown GAME!

  • lol, just make a custom cfg, and u can do it....

  • 1:30

    Take a look at how that shadow from the falling tree animates. Hilarious. Other then that, it really shows what the 360 can handle, but despite what fanbois will say, the PS3 will always look better with it's faster processor and better video card.

    But PC always wins.

  • I think most people are aware of that by now (It has been posted several times and there's even a vid up showing it) Also the 360 has a stronger gpu...

  • @Joroshira THE PS3 DOESNT HAVE A faster video card, fucking retard.

  • @TortillaGaming

    Your intelligence shines, like a wet turd in the darkest seas.

  • @Joroshira Thanks but seriously, you're stupid.

    P.S. The PS3 has a worse GPU than the Xbox 360.

  • @TortillaGaming

    Faster != Better.

    Read it up. Kthx.

    Protip: Replying to a 2-year old comment is for cool people.

  • @Joroshira Ex multi-platform game developer said...

  • @Joroshira "There are *very* few instances where one would pick the PS3 gpu over the 360's because the PS3's gpu is weak compared to 360's. That's not just my opinion, ask other devs how they feel about it. Sony chose poorly when they chose the video hardware. Performance wise, the 360's video will out render the PS3's everytime if you feed it the same 3d scene. The only way to make the PS3 keep pace is to leverage its spu's to preprocess your 3d scene."

  • I can see in the end that the engine proberly gonne be over made to a Rpg engine to, that can be cool playing like gothic 4 in cryengine3 xP

  • I have to disagree with you there is a huge graphical difference between 2 and 3... the PC is clearly a much much better machine and it shows. The Cryengine 3 is roughly the same as Cryengine 2 on medium settings, which isn't terrible but it isn't outstanding. The engine is fantastic but I never liked the gameplay in Crysis... took generic and boring.

  • is it me or does this game look like it has shitty grpahics compared to gran turismo5? i mean like the graphics int his game dont even look close to real , but with gran turismo 5 with constant 60fps and photo realistic graphics, cryengine just cant compare

  • err yh i get your point, but i truly don't see why you compare it with GT5...

  • @PaGoNdA yeah but gran turismo is built for the ps3 and no one else where the cryengine3 is multiplatform

  • why do consoles don't have anti-aliasing

  • I don't have a really good explanation for that other than weak hardware and demanding games. 360 has a bit better AA than ps3 though.

  • that eye is scary :(

  • ... and imagine this with some mods like CCC mod was in crysis :) im sure there will be some mods for this too

  • yeah, too bad mods mostly doesn't make it to consoles =/, the only game i can think of that has mods on consoles is unreal tournament 3 on ps3. Hopefully i can get my computer fixed up before crysis 2 comes out...the motherboard and powersupply were broken from the start, so i sent it back, got new stuff and it still doesn't work...so i am gonna try sending the whole shit back and let them have a look at it.

  • PC the best !

  • In my eyes,

    PS3 ->High with some Medium

    360 -> Medium with some High

  • It's been said that the game on the consoles will be the equivalent of Crysis on medium settings.

    That's quite spectacular.

  • compare neon lamps from the xbox360 @ 0.54 and the ps3 @ 0.56....

  • Hmm.... Sometimes the demo has less than 24 fps. Crytek couldn't buy SLI? Or CE3 is not ready?

  • The demo goes down to 10-15fps in several parts. This is becouse teh CE3 techdemo is running on consoles hardware and the processing power is limited compared to a general gaming PC.

  • the latter

  • and at about 1:45 a piece of wood that got blown off the dock seemingly disappeared into the watr without any splashes or waves or any type of collision.

  • don't try to act cool here lol, i know you watched that other CE3 VS CE2 video, and obviously cryengine 2 (maxed out) is more powerful...but don't try to pull that shit on me lol, and i can tell you the reason it is because of the fact that CRYTEK doesn't know how to adapt their games to limited hardware...it's a lot easier for pc because then they can make the maximum better than any pc in existence basically -_-

  • Comment removed

  • glitch as he said 4 posts below

  • why is it that the shadows and effects(explosions etc.) happen at roughly half the framrate as the event that triggered them(tree falling and shadows don't keep up, smoke spreading super duper slow from explosions)?

  • this is a tech "DEMO" ! it is not the final product, it is just testing and demonstration of early work on the cryengine for consoles.

  • Great.

    Crysis 2 is for PC too, check in the Official Website.

  • yes i am aware of it coming for pc too, did i say it won't come for pc? i even typed in a comment "but if i get a new computer soon i might just as well get it on pc"...meh, anyway this specific video is for console versions, not pc.

  • Looking good, I'm really looking forward to crysis 2 and I hope console uses can experience it too :)

  • ya me too, will be interesting to see if they can pull it off. but if i get a new computer soon i might just as well get it on pc =D!

  • Serious engine 3 will own this

  • and by that you mean the pc version :)? of course it will...even engine 2 will probably own this...(with a rlly good pc of course) but...this is just early testing i guess, we'll see how it works out. and also...i guess the guys at CRYTEC aren't used to code for "limited software" xD, crysys system requirements were (and still are) utterly ridiculous if you look at games like Killzone 2 or any other newer games.

  • my eyes just got cut up by all the jaggies

  • lol im weak

    are you an owner of a really good rig?

  • haha not really, but i might get a new one in a couple of days if i am lucky =) (just waiting for it to be restocked) i can play all the games i feel like playing at the moment though...

  • Pretty good so far, but it'll be a while before it beats cryengine 2

  • lol...

    this engine will own the cryengine 2, and you should know that there isent any engine like this one jet!

  • Dude.... Once you give me photo/video evidence I'll believe but so far it's NOTHING compared to Cryengine 2, believe me

  • lol... we`ll see when the engine comes out :P. I will upload a movie for you when ive got the game...

  • is the best thing that I saw

  • @xenet17 no doubt

  • Looked pretty damn impressive to me.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more