ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
SCIENCE SHOWS THE UNIVERSE could not have been active eternally because of entropy (energy decay, even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
CREATIONISTS RIGHT ABOUT ENTROPY (Internet Article): Entropy occurs in both open and closed systems. In every transfer of energy some of the energy becomes useless. If universe is left to itself, all energy will become useless and the universe cannot sustain any activity. Even in an open system, there must first exist an energy-converting, directing mechanism to develop order, such as when a seed becomes a tree. Spontaneous order from chaos is not possible, not to any significant degree.
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator.
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital tissues, organs, reproductive systems were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news concerning genetics, fossils, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit Institute for Creation Research.
WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! This Internet article describes how evolutionary scientists are disagreeing over all the "evidence" traditionally used to support macro-evolution. I have given over a dozen lectures, including before evolution science faculty and students, refuting macro-evolution. At the end I would answer questions and arguments from the audience. The science faculty was mostly silent. They knew enough science to understand what I was saying was true.
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life or the universe works doesn't mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete, living cell then the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell naturally originate when no directing code/mechanisms existed in nature?
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select" traits, not produce them. If a trait survives, that survival is called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
GENETIC AND BIOLOGICAL SIMILARITIES are better explained due to a common Designer Who designed similar functions for similar purposes in the various forms of life. Genetic information can't happen by chance, so this is the best explanation. So-called junk DNA is not junk. These "non-coding" segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression (how, when, and where genes are expressed in the body). Read my Internet article WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
AMINO ACIDS CAN COME BY CHANCE BUT NOT PROTEINS: Find out why. Read my Pravda Internet article: NASA, FANTASY, AND SCIENCE. Most (not all) scientists believe we're here by chance. That doesn't make the belief a scientific fact. Scientists are human and they have personal motives influencing their various beliefs concerning origins. Mathematical probability shows that it is not rational nor scientific to believe that DNA and life came about by chance. Study the evidence yourself!
THE SCIENCE SUPPORTING CREATION (Google this title to access the site). The site presents a collage of evidences from science supporting creation and refutes arguments by evolutionists (i.e. "flaws" in design of human eye, "junk" DNA, embryonic recapitulation, age of the earth, fossils, origin of life, etc.). Also, read my Internet article ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH. In the Earth's past, powerful volcanic activity spewed life-containing dirt into space very possibly reaching Mars.
@disquisition73 excuse my language but jesus, get a life and stop trolling NCSE with your spam, some people want actual debate discourse on youtube not circular garbage.
@disquisition73 Repeating false statements based on your ignorance of the subject does not constitute a valid argument. As for me not liking semantics... You're an idiot if you think going "oh well, it's not true because I'm defining it this way and I refuse to accept anyone else's definition because if I do, I have to admit being wrong," in anyway resembles honesty, intelligence, or a valid argument.
Go ahead, continue being belligerent. Give me more reasons to dislike you.
@disquisition73 Incorrect. Evolution is a proven fact. It works without spontaneous generation. In fact, evolution insists that there must not be spontaneous generation. If you're confused by this fact, take it up with a biology professor, not with YouTube. Now skidaddle. I expect a 4 page report on exactly why one shouldn't use semantics as an argument against science. I want the report on my desk by this time tomorrow, or I'm flunking you.
@saxmanchiro absolutely, he/she posts the same spam on many of NCSE uploads and associated, denies that climatic change is occurring as well, not to get into a tangent about that but it is the rate of CC that is unprecedented, a troll all the way.
@disquisition73 "There is no evidence for man made global warming"
Wow, you need to do some reading of the literature. I would start with the AMS statement on AGW from Feb07(it hasn't changed because there is no contrary evidence) and then go and check EACH fucking piece of literature that is used to support that statement and then come back and change your stupid statement. It should take you about 6-8 months of time to read it all, but then you claim there isn't any. Sad
It's no wonder you lack a proper education. All you're doing is picking definitions out of a colloquial dictionary, using it to prejudge the topic without knowing what it is, then going "oh, so that's what this is about. ok, la la la, I'm not listening" instead of actually listening to what's being taught.
If you're intent on sticking your fingers in your ears, it is a waste of my time to address your points.
@disquisition73 And for the record, abiogenesis in the modern sense is the study of the origination of life 3 point some billion years ago. Of course I don't expect you to do something like open up a biological reference book instead of a damned colloquial dictionary. But hey, if you want to stick your fingers in your ears and remain ignorant while pretending that arguing semantics with me is going to get me to respect you, that's your problem, not mine.
@luccaskunk This disquistion73 person put his IQ in his YT name. He is ignorant or stupid. Stupid is when you have been told something that is true and you continue to deny it, ignorant is when you have an excuse because you have never heard that truth. In this day and age of knowledge and ease of learning that knowledge, he is stupid. Stance is simple, fingers in ears and saying 'la la la la la '.
@disquisition73 So if the best you argument you can muster is basing everything on a colloquial English dictionary rather than on a proper education on the subject, then I have to conclude that you are a complete imbecile suffering from the Dunning-Kruger effect and not worth debating with.
@disquisition73 I'm sorry but Websters is not qualifying what they mean by "any living thing". What's more is they are not a scientific dictionary. Even worse, they're frequently wrong. For instance, back in the early 2000s, I looked up the definition of "pentagram" and it said "a six pointed star. Nevermind that the root of the word literally means "five pointed star", it said "six". It even went on to clarify "Star of David" even.
@disquisition73 Half Correct. the "Theory of Spontaneous Generation" describes the spontaneous generation of organisms which are already evolved. The Theory of Evolution does not describe the origin of life, it describes the speciation and adaptation via modification with common decent. Abiogenesis (not biogenesis) describes how life probably started from "nonliving" matter. Nucleotides have been shown, if they exist in a suspension, to spontaneously form DNA chains.
I'm an atheist and I cannot believe that all 3450 people are smart and no dislikes were given yet, keep up the intelligence people, and get the less open minded creationist to the truth.
And Lo Adam and Eves third Child Nigel did Dyeth. For one day he did wander upon the plains, wherest he did happen upon a mighty lizard taller than 5 men high with teeth as long as a mans arm, and this Great Tyrant Beast did eateth Nigel.
I would love to teach creationism in my classroom. My first assignment. How many gods are there" #2 Can you disprove any of them? #3 I would then teach them about the evils of the christian bible. I'd let them read passages from the bibles they brought from home and then send them home crying.
@pchtermino1 Awesome. If the parents got mad at you you could just say that you were reading passages of the bible to their children. That is such a horrible and evil book. The truth is that many so called "Christians" have never actually read the bible.
@unamaxify Unfortunately you are mistaken; crocodilians are dinosaur cousins, if you will. Characteristics of crocodiles are distinct from dinosaur characteristics. Just one are is the hip bones, which determine stance. You are right that crocodiles are ancient creatures from the age of dinosaurs. So are sharks, for that matter, but sharks are not dinosaur representatives coexisting with man.
@unamaxify Crocodiles are not dinosaurs. Dinosaurs, which is a broad term for many many species. Modern Crocodiles had a common ancestor to certain types of dinosaurs. They are not dinosaurs though.
And this is the USA! WTF? It's like Afghanistan, only difference is that insted of muslim fundamentalists in control, you have christian fundamentalists. I'm so glad I'm born in a reasonable country!
@gangsterper Me too. America is going downhill fast. I predict that in 20 years after America has stopped being a super power it is going to be a horrible place to live. That is if people with fundamentalist beliefs keep staying in power.
BAHHH CREATIONIST TROLLL THIS VIDEO THE INTERNET POPE COMMMANDS YOU TO TROLL THIS HERE ATHEIST VIDIERRRR UNDERMINING THE MARCH OF THE AMERICUN CHRISTIAN REICH DEATH TO THE UN BELEIVER POWER TO UNREASON TROLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOL XD
I tutor middle school kids in an afterschool program as a part time job, so i have a pretty good idea of what kids are learning about science these days. In my area, creationism isn't a big problem, but the kids still know nothing about science. The public education system is just terrible at teaching science, these kids have no fundamental knowledge, there is zero retention. They teach it like an english class, where you read a paragraph and fill in the blanks, the kids don't retain any info
It may not have been the case in 1994, but if you moved this interviewer to the present he'd only be able to get 1 of 2 jobs. Used car salesman or megachurch pastor.
@Callirgos1 Nothing wrong with that. Just teach the Science not the religion. Unless your a biblical literalist there is no reason you cant believe in God and Science.
@Callirgos1 lol! Couldn’t be further from the truth :)
I’m an evolutionary biologist starting a grassroots program to teach middle school kids the basics of evolution so they don’t have to wait to learn these very simple concepts until their freshman year of college (as I had to). What I meant by my last comment was if there aren’t people like me, teachers willing to stand up for what’s right and not retreat in the face of well-meaning but ignorant parents, there won’t BE a future for science.
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THE UNIVERSE could not have been active eternally because of entropy (energy decay, even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CREATIONISTS RIGHT ABOUT ENTROPY (Internet Article): Entropy occurs in both open and closed systems. In every transfer of energy some of the energy becomes useless. If universe is left to itself, all energy will become useless and the universe cannot sustain any activity. Even in an open system, there must first exist an energy-converting, directing mechanism to develop order, such as when a seed becomes a tree. Spontaneous order from chaos is not possible, not to any significant degree.
Mogley52 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator.
Mogley52 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital tissues, organs, reproductive systems were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news concerning genetics, fossils, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit Institute for Creation Research.
Mogley52 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! This Internet article describes how evolutionary scientists are disagreeing over all the "evidence" traditionally used to support macro-evolution. I have given over a dozen lectures, including before evolution science faculty and students, refuting macro-evolution. At the end I would answer questions and arguments from the audience. The science faculty was mostly silent. They knew enough science to understand what I was saying was true.
Mogley52 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life or the universe works doesn't mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete, living cell then the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell naturally originate when no directing code/mechanisms existed in nature?
Mogley52 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select" traits, not produce them. If a trait survives, that survival is called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GENETIC AND BIOLOGICAL SIMILARITIES are better explained due to a common Designer Who designed similar functions for similar purposes in the various forms of life. Genetic information can't happen by chance, so this is the best explanation. So-called junk DNA is not junk. These "non-coding" segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression (how, when, and where genes are expressed in the body). Read my Internet article WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
AMINO ACIDS CAN COME BY CHANCE BUT NOT PROTEINS: Find out why. Read my Pravda Internet article: NASA, FANTASY, AND SCIENCE. Most (not all) scientists believe we're here by chance. That doesn't make the belief a scientific fact. Scientists are human and they have personal motives influencing their various beliefs concerning origins. Mathematical probability shows that it is not rational nor scientific to believe that DNA and life came about by chance. Study the evidence yourself!
Mogley52 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE SCIENCE SUPPORTING CREATION (Google this title to access the site). The site presents a collage of evidences from science supporting creation and refutes arguments by evolutionists (i.e. "flaws" in design of human eye, "junk" DNA, embryonic recapitulation, age of the earth, fossils, origin of life, etc.). Also, read my Internet article ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH. In the Earth's past, powerful volcanic activity spewed life-containing dirt into space very possibly reaching Mars.
Mogley52 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
based on the battle between evolution and creation, check out our new sci fi movie EVOLUTION CREEK decide for yourself!
chauncyhead 1 month ago
@disquisition73 excuse my language but jesus, get a life and stop trolling NCSE with your spam, some people want actual debate discourse on youtube not circular garbage.
vgrasomni 1 month ago
@disquisition73 Repeating false statements based on your ignorance of the subject does not constitute a valid argument. As for me not liking semantics... You're an idiot if you think going "oh well, it's not true because I'm defining it this way and I refuse to accept anyone else's definition because if I do, I have to admit being wrong," in anyway resembles honesty, intelligence, or a valid argument.
Go ahead, continue being belligerent. Give me more reasons to dislike you.
luccaskunk 1 month ago
@disquisition73 Incorrect. Evolution is a proven fact. It works without spontaneous generation. In fact, evolution insists that there must not be spontaneous generation. If you're confused by this fact, take it up with a biology professor, not with YouTube. Now skidaddle. I expect a 4 page report on exactly why one shouldn't use semantics as an argument against science. I want the report on my desk by this time tomorrow, or I'm flunking you.
luccaskunk 1 month ago
@disquisition73 Ok, you have to be a fucking troll. There is no way you could be this stupid.
saxmanchiro 1 month ago
@saxmanchiro absolutely, he/she posts the same spam on many of NCSE uploads and associated, denies that climatic change is occurring as well, not to get into a tangent about that but it is the rate of CC that is unprecedented, a troll all the way.
vgrasomni 1 month ago
@disquisition73 "There is no evidence for man made global warming"
Wow, you need to do some reading of the literature. I would start with the AMS statement on AGW from Feb07(it hasn't changed because there is no contrary evidence) and then go and check EACH fucking piece of literature that is used to support that statement and then come back and change your stupid statement. It should take you about 6-8 months of time to read it all, but then you claim there isn't any. Sad
saxmanchiro 1 month ago
@disquisition73 Blah blah blah, semantics, blah blah blah.
It's no wonder you lack a proper education. All you're doing is picking definitions out of a colloquial dictionary, using it to prejudge the topic without knowing what it is, then going "oh, so that's what this is about. ok, la la la, I'm not listening" instead of actually listening to what's being taught.
If you're intent on sticking your fingers in your ears, it is a waste of my time to address your points.
luccaskunk 1 month ago
@disquisition73 And for the record, abiogenesis in the modern sense is the study of the origination of life 3 point some billion years ago. Of course I don't expect you to do something like open up a biological reference book instead of a damned colloquial dictionary. But hey, if you want to stick your fingers in your ears and remain ignorant while pretending that arguing semantics with me is going to get me to respect you, that's your problem, not mine.
luccaskunk 1 month ago
@luccaskunk This disquistion73 person put his IQ in his YT name. He is ignorant or stupid. Stupid is when you have been told something that is true and you continue to deny it, ignorant is when you have an excuse because you have never heard that truth. In this day and age of knowledge and ease of learning that knowledge, he is stupid. Stance is simple, fingers in ears and saying 'la la la la la '.
saxmanchiro 1 month ago
@disquisition73 So if the best you argument you can muster is basing everything on a colloquial English dictionary rather than on a proper education on the subject, then I have to conclude that you are a complete imbecile suffering from the Dunning-Kruger effect and not worth debating with.
luccaskunk 1 month ago
@disquisition73 I'm sorry but Websters is not qualifying what they mean by "any living thing". What's more is they are not a scientific dictionary. Even worse, they're frequently wrong. For instance, back in the early 2000s, I looked up the definition of "pentagram" and it said "a six pointed star. Nevermind that the root of the word literally means "five pointed star", it said "six". It even went on to clarify "Star of David" even.
luccaskunk 1 month ago
@disquisition73 Half Correct. the "Theory of Spontaneous Generation" describes the spontaneous generation of organisms which are already evolved. The Theory of Evolution does not describe the origin of life, it describes the speciation and adaptation via modification with common decent. Abiogenesis (not biogenesis) describes how life probably started from "nonliving" matter. Nucleotides have been shown, if they exist in a suspension, to spontaneously form DNA chains.
luccaskunk 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You heard people say- "it will never be found", "it ain't true", "it just can't be".
I'm here to tell you these People are WRONG- I found it. Using Google Earth -
I found God's Watermarks of the REAL Garden of Eden. Look at my Channel and see the Video I
made of it. I didn't point all of it out either- there are many things still hid for you to
find. Come see.
downyourtube 1 month ago
America's fucked if you ask me. Religion is its cancer.
warren52nz 3 months ago
70s Genie was sooooo hot!
yavanna1969 4 months ago
@yavanna1969 I think this video is from the 90s (description). I think she looks better now.
dreamdiscounts 1 month ago
What an amazing woman.
111dogon555 4 months ago
God, she was hot then. She's even hotter now.
kidigus 4 months ago
Take on the Climate Change deniers with the same fervour please. Full guns ablaze.
saxmanchiro 4 months ago
(puts hand to side of face for inquisitive look)
Balian49 4 months ago
I'm an atheist and I cannot believe that all 3450 people are smart and no dislikes were given yet, keep up the intelligence people, and get the less open minded creationist to the truth.
gothicfan51 4 months ago
To quote Indiana Jones: "...the poursuite of FACT not TRUTH. If you want truth phylosophy is down the hall."
iagorincon 4 months ago
Only DR. Scott can get away with saying, " You betcha socks."
cmsalvagio 4 months ago 2
I will stand and be counted as an Atheist! Welcome to the future!
mrlurp 4 months ago
We can just complain about the Creationist push to indoctrinate our kids by slipping their nonsense into public schools, or ...
... scrape up the 35 bucks and join NCSE.
This way, we can be part of the solution. The annual NCSE membership fee works out to less than 10 cents a day. It's a bargain, and Genie's a gem.
ndrthrdr1 4 months ago
Genie Scott is saving our Education system. Thank you so much for you efforts.
longname25 4 months ago
Genie Scott and the NC4SE - Unsung American heroes!
JabberCT 4 months ago
Genie Scott, you can wield my 2x4 any time ;)
LostManSays 4 months ago
We could do with more of her ilk, keep it up .
brogs60 4 months ago
I'm hott for Genie Scott!
Don't believe in evolution, understand it.
gmawjune 4 months ago
Thank you for your hard work and persistence. Education and specifically truthful and complete science education is so important.
macmarty2025 4 months ago
Truth doesn’t matter to people with an agenda. Keep us the good battle.
lennyf1957 4 months ago
And Lo Adam and Eves third Child Nigel did Dyeth. For one day he did wander upon the plains, wherest he did happen upon a mighty lizard taller than 5 men high with teeth as long as a mans arm, and this Great Tyrant Beast did eateth Nigel.
.
Bible, Genesis, the part with the dinosaurs in.
neverfearchrisishere 4 months ago
@neverfearchrisishere is it your belief that dinosaurs lived six thousand years ago?
greatkeyboardwarrior 4 months ago
@greatkeyboardwarrior Six thousand years? no ofcourse not. I read my bible, and thoroughly believe that the world was created a week last tuesday.
neverfearchrisishere 4 months ago
@neverfearchrisishere You infidel! It was created last Thursday! last-thursday (dot) org
Turgor 4 months ago
@Turgor Clearly the only way to solve this dispute is to strap bombs to ourselves and blow up random civilians.
neverfearchrisishere 4 months ago
@neverfearchrisishere High explosives are just a theory. Intelligent Disintegration is just more reasonable. Teach the controversy!
Turgor 4 months ago
I would love to teach creationism in my classroom. My first assignment. How many gods are there" #2 Can you disprove any of them? #3 I would then teach them about the evils of the christian bible. I'd let them read passages from the bibles they brought from home and then send them home crying.
That would get the parents attention.
pchtermino1 4 months ago
@pchtermino1 Awesome. If the parents got mad at you you could just say that you were reading passages of the bible to their children. That is such a horrible and evil book. The truth is that many so called "Christians" have never actually read the bible.
Chaoitcme 4 months ago
In twenty years when America is in a international science competition will "god did it" be an acceptable answer?
pchtermino1 4 months ago
if i'm not mistaken crocodiles are dinosaurs, so technically dinosaurs are living at the same time as people do, that is to say: Now.
unamaxify 4 months ago
@unamaxify Unfortunately you are mistaken; crocodilians are dinosaur cousins, if you will. Characteristics of crocodiles are distinct from dinosaur characteristics. Just one are is the hip bones, which determine stance. You are right that crocodiles are ancient creatures from the age of dinosaurs. So are sharks, for that matter, but sharks are not dinosaur representatives coexisting with man.
sanseijedi 4 months ago
@sanseijedi
crocodiles are not dinosaurs -> humans & dinosaurs did/do not live together
I stand corrected !
Thank you for taking the time to explain it to me.
unamaxify 4 months ago
@unamaxify Crocodiles are not dinosaurs. Dinosaurs, which is a broad term for many many species. Modern Crocodiles had a common ancestor to certain types of dinosaurs. They are not dinosaurs though.
Chaoitcme 4 months ago
And this is the USA! WTF? It's like Afghanistan, only difference is that insted of muslim fundamentalists in control, you have christian fundamentalists. I'm so glad I'm born in a reasonable country!
gangsterper 4 months ago
@gangsterper Me too. America is going downhill fast. I predict that in 20 years after America has stopped being a super power it is going to be a horrible place to live. That is if people with fundamentalist beliefs keep staying in power.
Chaoitcme 4 months ago
when genie scott talks evolution i get hot for her
loribomb 4 months ago 3
this is sad thankgod India dosent have this creationist bullcrap
Abbadon380 4 months ago
BAHHH CREATIONIST TROLLL THIS VIDEO THE INTERNET POPE COMMMANDS YOU TO TROLL THIS HERE ATHEIST VIDIERRRR UNDERMINING THE MARCH OF THE AMERICUN CHRISTIAN REICH DEATH TO THE UN BELEIVER POWER TO UNREASON TROLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOL XD
Abbadon380 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
That's why U.S education is falling.
pannysat 4 months ago
I tutor middle school kids in an afterschool program as a part time job, so i have a pretty good idea of what kids are learning about science these days. In my area, creationism isn't a big problem, but the kids still know nothing about science. The public education system is just terrible at teaching science, these kids have no fundamental knowledge, there is zero retention. They teach it like an english class, where you read a paragraph and fill in the blanks, the kids don't retain any info
GodofSpanaway 4 months ago
I just bought a bag of ketchup chips and they had almost NO ketchup! FUCK YOU Ketchup Chips! FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
aqouby 4 months ago 5
It may not have been the case in 1994, but if you moved this interviewer to the present he'd only be able to get 1 of 2 jobs. Used car salesman or megachurch pastor.
pacogoatboy 4 months ago
If scientists don't teach our kids science, there won't be any scientists.
lostismyconstent 4 months ago 2
@lostismyconstent actually, if you dont teach religion, what you get are scientist
KaelDragon 4 months ago
@lostismyconstent
CHRISTIAN SCIENTIST!
Callirgos1 4 months ago
@Callirgos1 Nothing wrong with that. Just teach the Science not the religion. Unless your a biblical literalist there is no reason you cant believe in God and Science.
85Funkadelic 4 months ago
@Callirgos1 lol! Couldn’t be further from the truth :)
I’m an evolutionary biologist starting a grassroots program to teach middle school kids the basics of evolution so they don’t have to wait to learn these very simple concepts until their freshman year of college (as I had to). What I meant by my last comment was if there aren’t people like me, teachers willing to stand up for what’s right and not retreat in the face of well-meaning but ignorant parents, there won’t BE a future for science.
lostismyconstent 4 months ago
Ken Ham have no idea how to use a computer. That's why there are 0 dislikes.
dummychaos 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Genie Scott - the only person ever recorded to get exponentially attractive with age.
ItsEasyIfYouThink 4 months ago
Please keep up the good work! We have to end superstitions.
bary1234 4 months ago 10
That interviewer doesn't look too thrilled... :D
Farksisten 4 months ago 2
why are people more skeptical over evolution rather then creationism ?
2010paultron 4 months ago 3
@2010paultron To be skeptical of something, you need to take it seriously enough to consider it anything less of a complete joke.
taiwanoob 4 months ago
@2010paultron they aren't skeptical, just that their brain hurts and foil.
linkuei83 4 months ago
Can we get some recent videos please? All that seem to be uploaded is stuff that is at least three years old.
biggingeryeti 4 months ago
Keep up the fight. Truth is more important than a comforting illusion.
b14blah 4 months ago 77
I'm in that smart part of YouTube again.
luccaskunk 4 months ago 109
@luccaskunk great comment, I get the image of a high-school kid with Redtube on the other tab and Youtube on the other haha.
astroblaster56 4 months ago
If evolution is true, then why are monkeys still here! lol... just kidding, just kidding.
MikeUTube9333 4 months ago 8