Isn't the coaches willingness to bet against you more information that you should think the football field than you believed before you heard the bet?
Consider that I want to bet against you. There are 100 things that we both think we know well enough to bet on. You honestly list your beliefs on those 100 things. Then I choose the 5 that I am most willing to bet against you on. I'd guess you are going to lose money.
Sure no problem. Why are you using the mathematical notation for the sample distribution, when you are taking the population distribution? Am i missing something?
@phatdaddy9 I'm using the usual notation for the sample mean: given random variables X_1,...,X_n, the sample mean is \bar X = (1/n) sum_i X_i.
There's not really a "population" here. The closest thing to a population distribution in this example would be the Normal(theta,1) distribution we are assuming for the measurements. But note that in fact theta itself is a random variable in our model. (I haven't used "mu" anywhere in this video, but I could have used "mu" instead of "theta".)
great presentation! keep up the good work :)
awimagic 6 days ago
but, you really don't need to give a 2-min story and draw figures of "Tom" and "Coach".
shuaiyuanchn 2 weeks ago
Isn't the coaches willingness to bet against you more information that you should think the football field than you believed before you heard the bet?
Consider that I want to bet against you. There are 100 things that we both think we know well enough to bet on. You honestly list your beliefs on those 100 things. Then I choose the 5 that I am most willing to bet against you on. I'd guess you are going to lose money.
rrenaudrrenaud 4 months ago
Bah, I meant, "that you should think the football field is _smaller_ than ..."
rrenaudrrenaud 4 months ago
Wow! Thanks for this great video
fel27 4 months ago
why are you using x bar instead of mu? Wouldn't the measurement be the population instead of the sample size?
phatdaddy9 5 months ago
@phatdaddy9 I'm having difficulty understanding your question. Can you restate it in a different way?
mathematicalmonk 5 months ago
@mathematicalmonk
Sure no problem. Why are you using the mathematical notation for the sample distribution, when you are taking the population distribution? Am i missing something?
phatdaddy9 5 months ago
@phatdaddy9 I'm using the usual notation for the sample mean: given random variables X_1,...,X_n, the sample mean is \bar X = (1/n) sum_i X_i.
There's not really a "population" here. The closest thing to a population distribution in this example would be the Normal(theta,1) distribution we are assuming for the measurements. But note that in fact theta itself is a random variable in our model. (I haven't used "mu" anywhere in this video, but I could have used "mu" instead of "theta".)
mathematicalmonk 5 months ago