It's not fake, it clearly says the difference between DX9 and DX10 in Call of Juarez. That game is a piece of junk and I wouldn't be surprised if they were paid to overplay the look of DX10 in their game
if i'm right it is a fake but also dx10 was designed to add functionality and better rendering so unless the game is designed for the new direct x technology then you wont see a fucking thing so how people can try and compare the 2 when there both completely different i don't know
DX 10, only does volumetric and dynamic shit. DX 9 can be as good looking as DX 10 if they weren't aiming for marketing purposes. A clear example would be Metro 2033. No difference between the 2 DX9 and 10 can really be appreciated.
When i search online for game i find anything like RPG Maker Games like Final Fantasy - Endless Nova or Japanese Games like Ever 17 there was often some pieces of heaven in things like story.
The only important difference for a consumer would be performance and completely new features which are good. So basically 99% of all comparison videos on the internet is stupid.
Vista lags for me, with 6 GB of DDR2 RAM, ATi Radeon HD4200 IGP, AMD Turion 64 x2 M500 @ 2.2GHz
Not a single lag spike on 7. I regularly have 50+ tabs open in firefox while watching a movie (which, at good quality, can actually be a bit demanding).
So yeah, if you want to get vista, get it, but you'll regret it. Also, 7 does NOT look worse than vista (in fact, they look similar, or 7 might even look better, depends on your point of view.) I have 7, and I'm happy with it. Better than XP IMO :)
@slipknotskate1 Like I said, no lag on 7 with the 50 tabs, while vista at low res with no programs running acts like I'm running on a P1. Got the tabs closed anyway, I had my reasons to have all of that shit open back then.
Therefore, 7 is much better than vista, power hunger wise at least. If you do like vista, you can still dual boot though. Just my opinion. I've also heard a machine with 512 MB of RAM can run 7 without lag. [/OS discussion]
@sookoll23 I see, I'm thinking about upgrading to 7, but I don't really see the point RIGHT NOW; I've never experienced any problems except the massive RAM eating. Which doesn't really bother since I have 6 gigs. But it'll happen eventually, 7.
Who gives a fuck :P DX10 has slight improved graphics, i dont get it why do you even want to compare it, and i don't get it why people are seriously going apeshit about the fact that DX10 is betterlooking then DX9, DX 9 is outdated stuff get over it, by now we already have reached DX11 which kicks DX10's ass, ofcourse the FPS of DX9 is higher because it renders so much less, doesn't mean its better, its better for you if you don't have such a great computer. End of Story
god.. can you fools shut the fk up. you guys clearly have no damn clue how directx works. DirectX10 is always better. it isn't mean to be used on a old crappy grapphic card so don't whine just buy a new one. Go ahead and use windows XP. It's full of security holes and such compared to win7.
no it will never work for runescape unless they make a download version of the game and i bet you $50 the makers behind that abomination you call a game, they would go bankrupt
@MrPivotPie I'll bet another $50 that Jagex will still be in operation for at LEAST another ten years, currently, there are more 27million players and growing. I'd list 100 more reasons but this is youtube, and you are biased on your own opinion as I am mine as well as this is the internet, i'd keep the reason to myself. But $50 is still up for grabs.
Ridiculous that people are fooled to believe dx10 is better just because they use better textures/meshes/postprocessing effects in the dx10 pictures.
Seriously?? No textures have been changed.. None of the game files have been changed.. DX10 doesnt update the textures of every single DX game, that doesn't make sense. The changes are in the rendering.
Secondly, The lighting has changed quite a bit, Spec/Normal maps are more defined through the rendering, no game files have been changed.
DX11 is amaing though, its a huge improvement, specially for programmers.
Fun fact: Direct3D 10 is mostly architectural changes. Panning a landscape that is supposed to look the same in both versions to compare them is like comparing a pair of identical pictures from different cameras.
Seriously, people are fucking stupid. When you do some graphics programming yourself, then you can rant, but get some knowledge under your belt before you post this shit.
In any case, I've seen games intentionally changing textures and depths of field when you change DX. This is a business after all.
DX 10 and 11 are great excuses for ATI and Radeon and Windows (among other companies involved in the gaming industry) to sell new products IMO. The minor changes are really that, minor.
the architecture is different...when a game can run on dx9, it dont take dx10 at full. dx10 have a totally new shader system. enabling things like the nvidia cascade demo. (geometry shader)
No, Try 1024. not on high. Yes I can run it at 24-32 FPS. I think it might have a lot to do with the fact that I run a 17" CRT. LOL! I'm going to get a LCD soon.
Wow I'll let my wife know that some fag on youtube wants me to be a cocksucker so he can get head from me. Wow. Anything else stupid you wanna say? Wanna be a big guy on youtube? Call people names over the net makes you a big guy.. I'll put a 1000 bucks on it that if I was next to you, you would keep that pussy hole shut.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Hey Israel boy. Don't you have something better to do, like... see your people get blown up or suck a Iran dudes dick. Look out, Most od the world wants you dead. Better kiss the U.S.A.'s ass.
bragging? When did I? Kind of hard to do so when I don't have a computer all that powerful to talk about. I don't think a 17in CRT and a 9500gt gives me bragging rights.
Well good for you. My little comment was not cool. SO what. Just telling people that DX 10 will help get better FPS even if you have a shit video card. I thought it might help out or give hope for the kids who have a shit card.Now I have windows 7 and dx 11 has help me get just little more FPS. All I need now is a card that will run dx 11. bragging right now? Nope. Lets see what a low end dx 11 card will do.
Who.. If you are talking to me thats fine. I'll just play my guitar and jam out to Dream theater until you see me dead. I think I need to set up a cam so some one can put up the death of me on you tube.
this is all dx10. no one has dx9 anymore. they dont build it into the computers anymore. the top video just has low settings on. learn the facts before posting a video.
You do know that without Vista or 7, and a video card which supports DX10 you'll get DX 9? So lots of people are using DX9. WHy don't you learn the facts before complaining?
totally fucking fake, just different textures. DX11's only advantage is a little cleaner looking particle effects and barely noticeable shadow smoothing.
Well the real diffrance is actually only the look yeah DX10 looks beter more realisticer but requires u 2 have windows vista and a exetremly good rig if u wanth to play must games on decent graphic. on other hand DX9 has slightly worse graphics but dosent require u 2 have a good rig for your pc 2 have good graphic in other words if u had a 2 year old pc u could run on high quility but if u had vista u would run on low since vista uses most of ur pc resources 2 operate
lol did u even understanded what i wrote!? i said that in DX10 must games look beter coz enviorment in games looks nicer but you need a good pc so eg: i could max out one game on DX9 wich if i would try on DX10 i could only get on medium setings coz vista and w7 need good pc for playing games oh and im not a retard im 15 years old lol
you dont actually have to type everyhing in full english you know its not school , abbreviating and shortening is actually a smarter thing to do , damn you sounded sad
It probably would take more effort, just that everything that I have seen and heard about DX10 have been exaggerations. I know DX10 is superior to DX9 in every way, but no dev has made any real use of it. Every game so far that uses DX10 looks no different then a DX9 game. Makes it seem like a gimmick.
I see some difference in the bloom, like how the exposure changes when going behind the dark tree, mimicking an eye or a camera, but is that something only DX10 could do?
Look at the tree in the bakground, its definitly more detailed, and the tree in the DX10 mode seems to use parallaxmapping or something similar.. but i actually think that the major visual difference in these videos are bloom and textures.. but dont forget that DX10 has support for dynamic enviroments, meaning that grass and other plants actually grows.
I do admit that these comparisons seem un trustworthy.
When I saw it, I thought the same old ultra 64 "can only be done on a car" feeling.
For what it does is what should be compared between. I don't understand why none of the games on those comparisons look like any of the ones I play on pc.
Looked dated, not in comparison, but period. Like dx7-8 era.
woot, how are games in the future? Do you from the future have to use gaming helmets shit like that to play like if you really were inside the game? That'd be awesome.
you connect your brain to a machine and it will work.but you need Geforce 99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999900000000000000000000000000 to play it
Dx10 for better graphics is as real as 64 bit cpus were in farcry 1 haha.
MrDevlance 8 months ago
It's not fake, it clearly says the difference between DX9 and DX10 in Call of Juarez. That game is a piece of junk and I wouldn't be surprised if they were paid to overplay the look of DX10 in their game
elmstfreddie 8 months ago
DirectX 10 versus DirectX 7.
TamiyaGuy123 9 months ago
if i'm right it is a fake but also dx10 was designed to add functionality and better rendering so unless the game is designed for the new direct x technology then you wont see a fucking thing so how people can try and compare the 2 when there both completely different i don't know
willissteve0 11 months ago
sooooooo DX 9 is better?
Chrislav7 11 months ago
um, did people forget that DX10 brought us Unified Shaders?
gnuojoung 1 year ago
ha the rocks better are 10 mb fake but the tree ist better with 9
Tpal12 1 year ago
what does it matter? The graphivs dont make the game, the gameplay does that.
instructablesdinky 1 year ago
very notable!
McLivinif 1 year ago
I agree, plus if you look into the Call of Juarez DX10 patch change log, you can see it actually admits to changing the textures.
AntiHamster500 1 year ago
DX 10, only does volumetric and dynamic shit. DX 9 can be as good looking as DX 10 if they weren't aiming for marketing purposes. A clear example would be Metro 2033. No difference between the 2 DX9 and 10 can really be appreciated.
kiban2 1 year ago
@kiban2
I totally Agree!!
MirageBistro 1 year ago
@kiban2 maybe because it is not 100% DX10 enabled
newgenerationisbg 1 year ago
@MrVamsi2 btw if you use vista you have directx already
IittIebritain 1 year ago
@MrVamsi2 no, its cause i dont need one. ps3 is shit.
i should really stop talking to kids wtf am i doing
IittIebritain 1 year ago
@MrVamsi2 yeah but ps3 sucks.
IittIebritain 1 year ago
@MrVamsi2 then i find it interesting that you can play 3d games at all (except those with opengl)
IittIebritain 1 year ago
DX10 is a sh!t
TimisoaraCoolMixers 1 year ago
@MrVamsi2 lolz u should really download dx9 if u use xp :D
TheKehi 1 year ago
direct x 9 can look just as amazing as direct x 10 just look at valve, or anything made for the xbox 360 all of that uses direct x 9
1a5c 1 year ago
lol directx9 looks better
Danox94 1 year ago
this video says all... DX9 vs DX10 you only got a little bit better shader-effects but most of games are bullshit in storyline.
Wolfsblut51015 1 year ago
@Wolfsblut51015
thats why you read a book if you want story.
deluxedookie 1 year ago
@deluxedookie xD why would i read books? O.o
When i search online for game i find anything like RPG Maker Games like Final Fantasy - Endless Nova or Japanese Games like Ever 17 there was often some pieces of heaven in things like story.
Wolfsblut51015 1 year ago
me RE5 runs fine on dx9 and shit on dx10, however, i see very little difference between the 2...
BrunnerzTube 1 year ago
The only important difference for a consumer would be performance and completely new features which are good. So basically 99% of all comparison videos on the internet is stupid.
VerySeriousUser 1 year ago
not even the same mountain fuck wit...it is like me comparing your mums tits
seanmurray2010 1 year ago
3d ;)
Akonftme 1 year ago
DIREXT FUCKEN SUX FUCK ATI NIVIDA IS THE SHIT
AnthonyXD0 1 year ago
@AnthonyXD0
DirectX is in nVidea and ATi cards mate...
rndGSp 1 year ago
Troll.
CobraGMW2 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
directx 12 better
MoArachanox 1 year ago
directx 11 better
TheWindowsHack 1 year ago
directx1 10 better
fakarful2 1 year ago
its like a a comercial to a stupid product that shows you pictures before and after
Just take a look at this pectures !:D
1 (they show you a butt)
2(they show you a face)
and then:
All by using this product can you see the diference
in the vid isnt the same thing....
mihai96z3d 1 year ago
call of juarez is like a ghetto call of duty
TheHango 1 year ago
Vista lags for me, with 6 GB of DDR2 RAM, ATi Radeon HD4200 IGP, AMD Turion 64 x2 M500 @ 2.2GHz
Not a single lag spike on 7. I regularly have 50+ tabs open in firefox while watching a movie (which, at good quality, can actually be a bit demanding).
So yeah, if you want to get vista, get it, but you'll regret it. Also, 7 does NOT look worse than vista (in fact, they look similar, or 7 might even look better, depends on your point of view.) I have 7, and I'm happy with it. Better than XP IMO :)
sookoll23 1 year ago
@sookoll23 50+ tabs? Fucking close them then.
slipknotskate1 1 year ago
@slipknotskate1 Like I said, no lag on 7 with the 50 tabs, while vista at low res with no programs running acts like I'm running on a P1. Got the tabs closed anyway, I had my reasons to have all of that shit open back then.
Therefore, 7 is much better than vista, power hunger wise at least. If you do like vista, you can still dual boot though. Just my opinion. I've also heard a machine with 512 MB of RAM can run 7 without lag. [/OS discussion]
sookoll23 1 year ago
@sookoll23 I see, I'm thinking about upgrading to 7, but I don't really see the point RIGHT NOW; I've never experienced any problems except the massive RAM eating. Which doesn't really bother since I have 6 gigs. But it'll happen eventually, 7.
slipknotskate1 1 year ago
NO WAY GUYS, the texture on the mountain is the same! DX10 is just really really smart! Just kidding, different texture. :-)
ar15expert 1 year ago
Who gives a fuck :P DX10 has slight improved graphics, i dont get it why do you even want to compare it, and i don't get it why people are seriously going apeshit about the fact that DX10 is betterlooking then DX9, DX 9 is outdated stuff get over it, by now we already have reached DX11 which kicks DX10's ass, ofcourse the FPS of DX9 is higher because it renders so much less, doesn't mean its better, its better for you if you don't have such a great computer. End of Story
orcmisha 1 year ago
@FishPhilzey wow really?
903harman 1 year ago
god.. can you fools shut the fk up. you guys clearly have no damn clue how directx works. DirectX10 is always better. it isn't mean to be used on a old crappy grapphic card so don't whine just buy a new one. Go ahead and use windows XP. It's full of security holes and such compared to win7.
Monokster 1 year ago
microsoft sure is a scammer ass bitch
Nimerbushnaq 1 year ago
people change your system to vista or windows 7 your holding the new direct x 11 games back with your xp dx 9 crap!
1988scottcarey 1 year ago
@1988scottcarey FUCK YOU!! dont EVER tell anyone to get Vista!! EVER!! Go with win7!! you wont be Fucked in the end.
903harman 1 year ago
DirectX 9 for win
Gamer21gll 1 year ago
does this work for runescape maybe a stupid question but please answer
rivercisco 1 year ago
no it will never work for runescape unless they make a download version of the game and i bet you $50 the makers behind that abomination you call a game, they would go bankrupt
MrPivotPie 1 year ago
@MrPivotPie I'll bet another $50 that Jagex will still be in operation for at LEAST another ten years, currently, there are more 27million players and growing. I'd list 100 more reasons but this is youtube, and you are biased on your own opinion as I am mine as well as this is the internet, i'd keep the reason to myself. But $50 is still up for grabs.
Dnizzle7 1 year ago
GEFORCE 9500 GT HAVE DIRECTX 10?
capatais777 1 year ago
yes
jbeebrylle 1 year ago
from all the videos i've seen, there is such a small difference that there is NO WAY I'm replacing my xp with ANYTHING.
Its just a perfect os, and such minor graphic improvements aren't worth it.
KEKOLUL 1 year ago
the graphics is already good with dx9 and it's already fun enough that way
with dx10 it only makes the game lag and also i dun think it makes any diff at all
i regretted installing dx10 ok
so what if it makes the graphics better? is the game even as fun as it is on dx9 with all those lags
NO!!!!
SO DX10 SUX!
kuokstupid 1 year ago
DX 10 makes the game play more choppy.. Even though it looks doesn't look as good DX9 gives smoother gamplay
RisenAkaK3nnY1 1 year ago
ffffffaaaaakkkkkkkeeeeee!!!!!!11
boom122808 1 year ago
does direct 10x improve and add certain hardware ? example vertex shader and pixel shader
tekedaoda 1 year ago
@tekedaoda it cant add hardware and some ppl say it improve performance but idk
har32 1 year ago
In my opinion the graphics are as good as the company makes them.
dfgfdz10 1 year ago
what games use dx11 to their fullest? anyone?
TearsOfWar1 2 years ago
@TearsOfWar1
Colin mcrae Dirt 2 for example
ShelbyMustang456789 2 years ago
nah, dirt 2 uses dx11 to tha fullest :>
Dominionlord 2 years ago
but rally game doesn't need dx 11
i prefer fps games
they have more predispositions to use this than Colin
Hrabia9933 1 year ago
i got dx11 biatch ;p
Dominionlord 2 years ago
lol, directX war?, bitch?, fools war
AnderNirvana 2 years ago
nah, it's a war of perfection :<
Dominionlord 2 years ago
Ridiculous that people are fooled to believe dx10 is better just because they use better textures/meshes/postprocessing effects in the dx10 pictures.
VerySeriousUser 2 years ago
lol what a sarcastic you are
AnderNirvana 2 years ago
@AnderNirvana No
VerySeriousUser 2 years ago
direct x 9.0c in this picture the mountain is more natural............
In direct x 10 they need to work with the shadows on that mountain.
:)
IanasAnd 2 years ago
yea but dx10 has like twice the detail and rendering its gorgeous
Nitro192 1 year ago
Directx 9 looks realistic IMO
Iucifer 2 years ago
Pff...textures are different!!!
Cyberwolf888 2 years ago 7
DAMN! the mountains are beautiful in 10
hornerh2o 2 years ago
Seriously?? No textures have been changed.. None of the game files have been changed.. DX10 doesnt update the textures of every single DX game, that doesn't make sense. The changes are in the rendering.
Secondly, The lighting has changed quite a bit, Spec/Normal maps are more defined through the rendering, no game files have been changed.
DX11 is amaing though, its a huge improvement, specially for programmers.
FireSign27 2 years ago 5
i 2nd ur comment
ilikewiigames 2 years ago
dont see much of a difference, except in dx10 someone jizzed all over the mountain XD
iPhoneTuts 2 years ago 2
DirectX11 <3 fuck DX9 DX11 makes COD4 and Crysis more COOLER
aljay0007 2 years ago
Fun fact: Direct3D 10 is mostly architectural changes. Panning a landscape that is supposed to look the same in both versions to compare them is like comparing a pair of identical pictures from different cameras.
Seriously, people are fucking stupid. When you do some graphics programming yourself, then you can rant, but get some knowledge under your belt before you post this shit.
SystelCyrus 2 years ago 4
Thanks....
cybercrasher2 2 years ago
а теперь...сравни производительность на слабых компах
qarp0w 2 years ago
eso es call of juarez
Darco350 2 years ago
DirectX 10 pwnar DirectX 9 100%
AxelCoolify 2 years ago
pwnar? you mean pwns... :P
noobstuntguy 2 years ago
such a cheap comparison. you can clearly see that only the texture has been changed, no lighting or other special effects else
exilePerformance 2 years ago 88
@exilePerformance They think we are idiots or what?! xD
In any case, I've seen games intentionally changing textures and depths of field when you change DX. This is a business after all.
DX 10 and 11 are great excuses for ATI and Radeon and Windows (among other companies involved in the gaming industry) to sell new products IMO. The minor changes are really that, minor.
leoncolombo 1 year ago
@exilePerformance Lol they just put a different texture on that only works in dx10 mode lol.
SuperKindle 1 year ago
@exilePerformance This is why people should stop listen to Microsoft and ditch DirectX for OpenGL.
silvernode 1 year ago
@exilePerformance
what do you think dx10 does give you better shader's & and higher AA. video games still bake there lighting
deluxedookie 1 year ago
why wasn't that thing possible in directx9? it's just the texture that has changed
Terabytekit 2 years ago 9
DX9...much better, and really makes things more real...
joshuademoraes 2 years ago
is this a joke?
japangamesrocks 2 years ago 5
looks like a second texture and a depth blur.. jsuta comparison betwen to optimizations
Independentsoul85 2 years ago 2
ooooo, what i read below me isnt nerd rage as much as it is dumbass rage
lineridemidget 2 years ago
opengl FTW!! hehe
lineridemidget 2 years ago 4
vista is shit, direct x 9 can run all of which direct x 10 can.
Kossrifle 2 years ago
.....no it can't
manarfd 2 years ago
Yes...LOL it can.
I have xp and I have vista. I can run both at direct x 10 and make the 2 monitors look exactly the same. It may not work for you but I can for me :D.
Kossrifle 2 years ago
You may aswell say that dx3 and dx11 are the same aswell.
manarfd 2 years ago
Yes, because it's a configuration.
Kossrifle 2 years ago
the architecture is different...when a game can run on dx9, it dont take dx10 at full. dx10 have a totally new shader system. enabling things like the nvidia cascade demo. (geometry shader)
mat967 2 years ago
I have Nvidia 9000M on Xp running at a setting of directx 3. It looks the same to me. It is always different.
Kossrifle 2 years ago
In dx9 HDR off
DaKaRusss 2 years ago
I just got DX 10 and I can play crysis at just over 30 FPS on a 9500 gt video card. lol.
joevitxx 2 years ago
on low, at 800 x 600 maybe
manarfd 2 years ago
No, Try 1024. not on high. Yes I can run it at 24-32 FPS. I think it might have a lot to do with the fact that I run a 17" CRT. LOL! I'm going to get a LCD soon.
joevitxx 2 years ago
crt's ftw.
Mibmu 2 years ago
Shut up cocksucker no-one cares
TraNWhiZ 2 years ago
You wish I was a cocksucker you fag.
joevitxx 2 years ago
Yes, you are a cocksucker I'm afraid.
TraNWhiZ 2 years ago
Wow I'll let my wife know that some fag on youtube wants me to be a cocksucker so he can get head from me. Wow. Anything else stupid you wanna say? Wanna be a big guy on youtube? Call people names over the net makes you a big guy.. I'll put a 1000 bucks on it that if I was next to you, you would keep that pussy hole shut.
joevitxx 2 years ago
No-one gives a fuck about you and your fag wife, you're a cocksucker.
TraNWhiZ 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Hey Israel boy. Don't you have something better to do, like... see your people get blown up or suck a Iran dudes dick. Look out, Most od the world wants you dead. Better kiss the U.S.A.'s ass.
joevitxx 2 years ago
Doesn't change the fact that you're a bragging cocksucker.
TraNWhiZ 2 years ago
bragging? When did I? Kind of hard to do so when I don't have a computer all that powerful to talk about. I don't think a 17in CRT and a 9500gt gives me bragging rights.
joevitxx 2 years ago
OK then, lets settle this.
I just didn't like your little comment "i got dx10 run crysis at 30 bla bla lol" when no-one even cares.
TraNWhiZ 2 years ago
Well good for you. My little comment was not cool. SO what. Just telling people that DX 10 will help get better FPS even if you have a shit video card. I thought it might help out or give hope for the kids who have a shit card.Now I have windows 7 and dx 11 has help me get just little more FPS. All I need now is a card that will run dx 11. bragging right now? Nope. Lets see what a low end dx 11 card will do.
joevitxx 2 years ago
wow i support you but if you say something smart on youtube little kids freakout not knowing what it means so yeah
TJ5897 2 years ago
I'd rather see you dead.
Elintasokas 2 years ago
Who.. If you are talking to me thats fine. I'll just play my guitar and jam out to Dream theater until you see me dead. I think I need to set up a cam so some one can put up the death of me on you tube.
joevitxx 2 years ago
Sounds like a plan.
Elintasokas 2 years ago
yep.
joevitxx 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this is all dx10. no one has dx9 anymore. they dont build it into the computers anymore. the top video just has low settings on. learn the facts before posting a video.
Pyroney 2 years ago
The lower video is patched with new textures and shaders. That's not really fair since directx 9 also can use them.
Robbaz 2 years ago 6
You do know that without Vista or 7, and a video card which supports DX10 you'll get DX 9? So lots of people are using DX9. WHy don't you learn the facts before complaining?
MartinHaTh 2 years ago 3
haha xD retard
unox234 2 years ago
i'll wait for direct XYZ 20
ZenonDorinPower 2 years ago 9
I'll wait for DirectX 11
DrillRemover 2 years ago
DirectX 10!
speedBOX34 2 years ago
i have downloads directx 10 for my pc but the my PC can't install it why????
hakimi308 2 years ago
have you vista or xp ?
Zockerfreak999 2 years ago
FAKE
the first one have low setting -.-
Zockerfreak999 2 years ago
i can live with DX9
gtamaster1995 2 years ago
directx 10 on Gta IV...DAMN
Cr1ptlord 2 years ago
totally fucking fake, just different textures. DX11's only advantage is a little cleaner looking particle effects and barely noticeable shadow smoothing.
Dan4157 2 years ago
Is that real, becouse every idiot can put out the bloom effects, ati aliasing...
G4m3rfirst 2 years ago
i personally think that directx over 9000 is the best in computer gaming.
em5055 2 years ago
where can i download??
AwesomeSpriteDude 2 years ago
DX10.1
9silvergold5 2 years ago
DX 10 has more realistic environments
DX 9 has more cartoony environments
HumanOFtheWeek3000 2 years ago
HumanOFtheWeek, what do you call Crysis in DX9? Is that still cartoony to you?
TheLastSamurai14 2 years ago
im not talking about crysis im talking about this call of juerez game... why did i get a 5 thumbs down?
HumanOFtheWeek3000 2 years ago
Oh, Call of Juarez I can kind of understand. And I only gave you one thumb down.
TheLastSamurai14 2 years ago
where can i download dx9???
EnclaveSupporter 2 years ago
will it work on Combat Arms?
Does it reduce lag?
CuanajoVideos 2 years ago
no, combat arms doesnt use a dx10 compatible engine
mauricio1gonzalez 2 years ago
Well the real diffrance is actually only the look yeah DX10 looks beter more realisticer but requires u 2 have windows vista and a exetremly good rig if u wanth to play must games on decent graphic. on other hand DX9 has slightly worse graphics but dosent require u 2 have a good rig for your pc 2 have good graphic in other words if u had a 2 year old pc u could run on high quility but if u had vista u would run on low since vista uses most of ur pc resources 2 operate
Darkseer55 2 years ago
you must be retarded.
you can have windows vista and play in DX9, you just need to specify it
IShotWebTV 2 years ago
lol did u even understanded what i wrote!? i said that in DX10 must games look beter coz enviorment in games looks nicer but you need a good pc so eg: i could max out one game on DX9 wich if i would try on DX10 i could only get on medium setings coz vista and w7 need good pc for playing games oh and im not a retard im 15 years old lol
Darkseer55 2 years ago
so am I, bud. at least I can talk in full sentences/actually type out full words/capitalize/do anything taught in 1st grade english.
IShotWebTV 2 years ago
you dont actually have to type everyhing in full english you know its not school , abbreviating and shortening is actually a smarter thing to do , damn you sounded sad
AdiF50Ronaldo7 2 years ago
0-0 isnt there DX11?
Goubygb619 2 years ago
DX 10 is better (more beautiful effects) only you dont have vista ^^
I see in this video other textures
:O
misiuinietylko 2 years ago
i thing DX9 is better...
i dont now
JUAN32445337 2 years ago
I'm with you
GmodStriker 2 years ago
i think thats shader 2 vs shader 3
sonicblast19 2 years ago
not THAT big of difference...
wolfchow2 2 years ago
yeah thats dumb, thats not a dx10 difference... thats a different texture on the mountain
bogus vid
itsTottenwith2ts 2 years ago 6
This is silly. The only difference is one different texture on dx10? Woah. Woah.
hhrriisstt 2 years ago
how can it be the in the coj1 i get 20 fps and in coj2 i get 40?????
darlinggg2 2 years ago
8bit owns all directx
ThexDarksider 2 years ago 8
for crying out loud!
1, you should already know how ridiculous that question is, and 2, why don't you research it yourself, you're on the internet aren't you?
tjf4375 2 years ago
I'm confident that everything in the lower screen could be done in DX9.
Appule69 2 years ago
I agree, but the question is how much effort do you have to put in it.
Blomsterbob2K 2 years ago
It probably would take more effort, just that everything that I have seen and heard about DX10 have been exaggerations. I know DX10 is superior to DX9 in every way, but no dev has made any real use of it. Every game so far that uses DX10 looks no different then a DX9 game. Makes it seem like a gimmick.
Appule69 2 years ago
Surely that was just a texture improvement? I thought DirectX 10 improved shaders, not the actual textures themselves!
This video is misleading, unless whoever posts this doesn't understand that normal mapping and parallax mapping aren't the same thing.
UtopiaV1 2 years ago
This is not amazing... it's AMAZZING!
vangstaz 2 years ago
I see pure kickass difference in dx10.
xXAJHernandezXx 2 years ago 2
The texture on the mountains is different. :/
I see some difference in the bloom, like how the exposure changes when going behind the dark tree, mimicking an eye or a camera, but is that something only DX10 could do?
retread01 2 years ago 4
Look at the tree in the bakground, its definitly more detailed, and the tree in the DX10 mode seems to use parallaxmapping or something similar.. but i actually think that the major visual difference in these videos are bloom and textures.. but dont forget that DX10 has support for dynamic enviroments, meaning that grass and other plants actually grows.
notuern 2 years ago
and that's the new age of 4D grahics.
thefearlesstiger 2 years ago
you do know he could have alterd the graphic detail and maybe its not dx 9 vs dx10? it could be very high detail vs low
L00peey 2 years ago
big ass difrence good thinf i have derectX 10
imalejandro117 2 years ago
I do admit that these comparisons seem un trustworthy.
When I saw it, I thought the same old ultra 64 "can only be done on a car" feeling.
For what it does is what should be compared between. I don't understand why none of the games on those comparisons look like any of the ones I play on pc.
Looked dated, not in comparison, but period. Like dx7-8 era.
silenceofthehills 2 years ago
I mean cart, not car.
(yet we saw it everyday on even dreamcast)
silenceofthehills 2 years ago
DirectX 1337 is totally awesome!
Xarieus 2 years ago
true,but the shadows are a bit unrealistic :) .(i come from the future)
sereda008 2 years ago
I see, I see
Xarieus 2 years ago 2
woot, how are games in the future? Do you from the future have to use gaming helmets shit like that to play like if you really were inside the game? That'd be awesome.
gsp1995 2 years ago 2
you connect your brain to a machine and it will work.but you need Geforce 99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999900000000000000000000000000 to play it
sereda008 2 years ago 3
and a