Hate the wealthy? Give to the less fortunate? "Even the playing field" ?
Here are average yearly incomes of several countries:
Brazil $8,135
Venezuela $11,444
India $1,054
China $3,212
USA $45,835
To even the playing field, we must "de-develop the USA" , redistribute the wealth globally (take your income) vis cap and trade and other measures. How does socialism look to you now? It's not taking money from the wealthy -- it's taking your money!
Wind and solar energy won't provide more than 20% of the electricity used in America. Power companies can't tolerate more than that because those green sources fluctuate too much. This cap and trade bill is an economy killer for America. Many industries will flee to countries where they don't have such onerous fuel taxes. Bye, bye jobs. China isn't afraid of coal. They build 1 new coal plant every 10 days, and we will be getting the brown cloud from them whether we believe in coal or not.
What is the thermostat set on in the White house? I don't like leaders trying kill our economy by over taxing fuel to reduce the use of it, while living it up in comfort provided by fuel. I'll believe these guys have some integrity when I see them walking or riding in rickshaws.
Why is TRNN supporting this "global warming is caused by human produced CO2" hoax?
Why don't they spend more time on the scientists around the world, who claim that the SUN is causing the global warming and the rise of CO2 levels and NOT the other way around.
I guess they're not so "independent" as they claim to be.
Thought of the day? If you remove all CO2 from the air. Not one life form would be left on this planet. On the other hand you have too much CO2 Plants and Animals will grow larger just like the time of the Dinosaurs.
Indications are that microbes can turn coal into natural gas(coal bed methane).
If true, why burn coal at all?
Also
If we look at every waste as a resource perhaps we can stop throwing away resources. Why sequester CO2 in the ground when it can be turned into food, fuel, building material,ext..?
global warming is a western imperialist scam to prevent 3rd world countries from developing under the cover of environmentalism.
global warming can be debunked in 5 minutes by anybody with half a brain. there really is no controversy about it. it's a open and shut case. there is no man-made global warming period.
why do you think the capitalists, who have destroyed the environment during the last 100 years are now championing GW, and ignoring flouride, GMOs, aspartame, mercury.. etc..?
you left wingers call us "conspiracy theorists", but you have no problem believing the conspiracy theory that oil companies are purposely manipulating the science to deny global warming, simply because that is the easiest and simplest explanation. well guess what, just because it's the simplest explanation doesn't make it true. try using your brains and a bit of sophistication like your enemies, to realise there are other explanations
Two words shut this down: "peer review." People don't seem to understand that serious scientists devoted to the principles of objectivity review one another's work even before it gets published. For instance, if I'm a geologist in Egypt, I have a colleague in Thailand and we 'peer review' each other's work. Or we both travel to a third location, the north pole maybe, and send our data to another set of peers for their review. Then we compile it all, etc. The same for other sciences.
I'd like to know your evidence as to HOW the scientific community has been discredited and is politically controlled.
As for incompetent, where do you get your electricity from? Where do you keep food? What transportation do you use? Have you ever been to a doctor?
What evidence shows otherwise? You just keep ranting without any evidence, references, or justifications. Its no wonder you know so little about the scientific method.
You've bought into something that you need to question.
IF they do cap and trade (and I think its a stupid idea). Dont give just corporations credits, give every person on the planet X amount of credits who can then sell them to the highest bidders. Let the people of the world get in on this ponsi sceme too!
Has anyone here heard that the entire solar system is heating up? NASA is aware of it and it has been covered briefly by the US news media. Even if we cut all of our carbon emissions tomorrow we would still have a warming planet. Global warming is a two fold problem. The first deals with increased solar output which is heating up the solar system. The second is our exacerbation of the problem by our choice to use carbon based fuels. We will be on oil for at least another 50 years minimum.
You seem to think that those who believe that global warming is anthropogenic do so only because Al Gore believes the same. It so happens that the majority (and near entirety) of climate scientists support the anthropogenic theory, and unless you are similarly trained in climate science, you have no credentials to dispute that consensus. Solar radiation is a possible theory, but the majority of climate scientists dismiss it for several good reasons. It's uncertain, so don't be arrogant.
There are many researchers who don't believe in man made global warming, but they are ignored by the media and have their funding pulled. This issue is not science, its politics.
thats hilarious. Well since you think you are causing global warming wht have you done personally to reduce your carbon emmission? you are still using electricity since youre on the computer.. you are murdering the planet man!
Solar panels on my house, growing a portion of my own food, not eating meat, walking/riding a bike where feasible, making sure my home/vehicle is as fuel efficient as possible, which also means not 'keeping up with the joneses' by buying into excess, etc. Many small things that all add up in the end.
I want to do these things also but I dont believe in man made global warming either. The government is the biggest liar. Everything they talk about is just to get more money and give that money to special interest groups. Carbon Tax....
It's called Carbon Neutral: You should try it, you could begin by generating your own energy by adding solar panels to your roof or a wind turbine...that's a start is it not?
The Pacific Research Institute made their own video debunking Al Gore's movie. Look it up here in youtube or googlevideo: An Inconvenient Truth... or Convenient Fiction?
thats right. just like income tax. set the blanket default as to taxable, and then make exemptions be selective, so that those that know as well as secret societies that have legislative exemption can get away with it.
why not have the default set to no tax, and then have selective taxes on certain items, excise taxes, since they dont get apportioned?
they like the default blanket method. whether its cap or soc, the top always have a loophole
From what I understand, global warming is still a controversial subject within the scientific community, so I don't see why we should to try to solve a problem that we don't even know is real.
Maybe it'S about control! It's obvious how the "free allowance" is like a grandfathering clause. You operate a huge coal plant, no problem! You get a free allowance, only FUTURE coal plants will get the carbon tax. This is bullshit, if you have grandfathering on these old technologies you won't solve global warming.
It's obvious this push isn't at all to do with global warming, it has to do with either enriching banks(trading, derivatives) or some sick social engineering program.
We had a a HOUSING DERIVATIVE BUBBLE that burst. Now, we will have a GREEN ENERGY DERIVATIVE BUBBLE. When will the bubble burst to destroy the rest of the American business? Oh, by the way, Obama has stock in the cap and trade scam. Obama will make a killing off this scam. This is NOT the time or place for a huge tax affecting the WHOLE entire U.S.
This is nothing but a new tax. It will drive more jobs overseas to china where they couldn't care less about this supposed global warming BS. Creating even more global pollution. If this is "global warming" Then the best way to handle this would be to bring the jobs back here form china where our ecology efforts are far better.
This is just another excuse to raise taxes on the poor. Contact your representative and demand they vote NO!!!!!
Well just like you say they could care less and these taxes don't apply to places like china because they won't agree to this garbage. They know it is fraud and the money is going to special interest groups like the one al gore himself runs. Pay him taxes so he can keep fueling his jet to fly everywhere making more co2 emissions than all of us allegedly and preaching about how bad we are for using cars to get to work when work is 45 min to an hour away. He is a douche bag and all of the others
All this regulation has nothing to do with dangerous emissions. Its about reducing the population along with other regulations in the pipeline in order to control growth. People need to look at everything how it will effect them to marginalised for the benifit of a few who make these regulations. You will be made POOR, TAXED, UNDEREDUCATED, PRISONED, MADE UNHEALTHY, and INSURED with a EARLY DEATH if you let a few POPULATION CONTROL MANAGERS RULE YOU. Start thinking PEOPLE with these LIARS!!
Climate change and global warming was a theory back in the 1960's. It's still a theory, but it seems to be happening faster than anybody expected.
If we want to change the physical trend, we will need a global moratorium on all forms of combustion, for at least 200 years. Even matches and candles could be outlawed.
To change the effective policy however, I doubt even a nuke-you-lure war would make any difference.
"co-discoverer of global warming" ... wtf? Someone in your staff has to study some science! I doubt one could say that Hansen discovered global warming. It was a gradual process over the past three decades of research by thousands of scientists - and fitting the pieces together one-by-one, they did the IPCC-report based on their vast research. But no single one "discovered" global warming!
And to enrich the banks! The debate USED to be about the best way to "save the planet".
Now looking at how Obama forced cap & trade into the discussion, it's obvious that this is being pushed by bigger powers than him. I watched the Davos conference on climate change, they said so themselves the only obstacle to global cap & trade is the US. With the volatility of prices it does ZERO to promote green energy.
The answer to global warming and other pollutions is less people. However since due to greed no one wants to do the obvious and do away with cars and other things that produce greenhouse gases then we suffer the consequences; the mother Earth will kill us off anyway with air pollution, water pollution, massive hurricanes, droughts, food shortages and other environmental ills. So keep playing the political game and ignore it. We need to lose five billion people that pollute.
Reminds me of the old car commercial for Fram oil filters. "you can pay me now or pay me later" Where the advertiser tells the customer while working on an engine with his hands greasy with grime you need to change the oil filter and pay the small cost or pay the bigger cost to do a more expensive job of rebuilding your engine.
yeah sicko, lets kill 5 billion so the 300 million premium humans can continue to drive SUVs! right now we produce enough food to support 12 billion people, our biomass on the planet is equivalent to ants - are they overpopulating as well? did you study biology, medicine, geography and meteorology to make the claim 5 billion people have to die? funny how most of the people that usually invoke "overpopulation" have no expertise in either one
They say the magic number is ten billion but with sacrifices. We chop down more trees to create more space for agriculture, desalinate the ocean water but that entails using more energy. Keeping everyone on a two thousand calorie diet a day. One car per household, etc... It really doesn't matter because the planet will balance the equation for us; unless we do it ourselves. We really need a nuclear war to help wipe out the excess population so the strong can survive. lol
yeah north koreans! who is they? the voices in your head? there are countless solution already in full existance, portable water filters that can filter virtually anything, farming highrises that multiply ground by the hundreds, hydroponics, new solar aso., its absurd to say where the limit would be if everything remains as it is
Yeah, yeah, yeah. But it's far easier to start a war and wipe out people, then the rest of us that are still alive can enjoy the fresh air and clean water. After all this other technology cost money and then the poor will die anyway because they can't afford the technology. Would you rather sacrifice a poor American when we can wipe out another country's population with a neutron bomb? lol
Cap and Trade, a group of inverters buys a Kansas Power Plant and sells the Excess pollution output to NY at $50 a ton and charges its customer base in Kansas $50 a ton for what they pollute. If they oversell and need more power they have to either buy power or buy back more CO2 permits, we hope at the $50 ton rate (don't hold your Breath), either way the Kansas Customers pay for NY power use. Current claims are that it will Cost 10 to 12 Dollars a ton, who believes that will be the price?
I cant believe someone judges a video before watching it. The Real News presented both sides of the issue, and yes it has some merits and huge demerits. I guess people like you are unconvertable with fair and balanced reporting I suggest you go back to your fox news and other MSM crap. The shock of seeing balanced reporting might kill you.
Thats only really valuable if you believe this global warming nonsense.
And I got to say I really dont expect a balanced view from a video titled "Cap and trade won't cut it", it seems to suggest that cap and trade doesn't go far enough instead of questioning the basic premise for the need for it.
Cap and trade should only include the top 100 polluters. The rest just get in the way... also, then we could make sure that the costs aren't simply passed on to us!
Corporations make profit by ignoring environmental costs. This is where they get their profits from! and we pay the bill to clean up after them...check the "polluter pays principle" in international law
Advising people to adopt more and have less children has never been advised, and of course, why should it be advised? A government's job is to rob people with excuses.
Governments are monopoly machines, they take place because people are too stupid to manage themselves, except for a few who are denied freedom and have to live in "nations" together with pathetic sheeple.
Listen, in Somalia the ruling faction is anyone with the guns, and those people, if given the chance, they would form a State and become the Government.
They know nothing about Free Market Anarchism, they are just lazy as fuck and a bunch of thieves.
for those who believe obama will shield low income people from paying a disproportionate amount of this money, then perhaps you also still believe that soon these wars will end, and soon the illegal detentions will end, and soon the NSA will stop spying on us without warrants. if this is you, then know that i envy the blissful ignorance you exist in. i truly do.
we exhale carbon dioxide and they tell us now that this is an environmental toxin. so indeed we will be taxed to breathe. have you not heard that ranchers will be taxed for the flatulence of every cow and pig they own? did you not hear this gentleman tell us that 85% of carbon taxes will be "giveaways" to big corporate interests? and even the companies who pay their carbon taxes will simply crank up the price of their product so that the common man will shoulder nearly the entire burden.
cap and trade, carbon credits, swaps etc... whatever the term of the day is are a bad idea. once again it allows the haves to do as they please while penalizing the have nots.
Someone ask this moron what each one of his breaths are going to cost. Or ask him howmuch he will pay per fart. I mean seriously he is totally dancing around the topic to make it sound nice. I will never pay this tax. It is time to come together round up these morons and put them on trial. Start with Ale Gore for saying these lies.
This has been flagged as spam show
Hate the wealthy? Give to the less fortunate? "Even the playing field" ?
Here are average yearly incomes of several countries:
Brazil $8,135
Venezuela $11,444
India $1,054
China $3,212
USA $45,835
To even the playing field, we must "de-develop the USA" , redistribute the wealth globally (take your income) vis cap and trade and other measures. How does socialism look to you now? It's not taking money from the wealthy -- it's taking your money!
vechorik 1 year ago
somebody peerrwied my penis.
hahaha, riding bike when possible.
al-save planet-gore chooses privatejet when possible .
yeah, follow him, do some pee a pee games.
hang the green party as long theres still trees.
311ftw 2 years ago
Is there any doubt left how insane this is????
nyteaparty 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EVERYONE that voted for this "Cap and Tax" should be voted out ASAP!
Time to call/ write/ email all our Senators to stop their vote on this.
United States Senate - (202) 224-3121
Lets put the pressure on AND KEEP IT ON and not stop until they vote this one down!
To find your senators phone number
w w w ( dot) senate (dot) gov /general/resources /pdf/ senators _ phone _list. pdf
(Type in without spaces)
Maybe attend a Tea Party too!
timmunst 2 years ago
Wind and solar energy won't provide more than 20% of the electricity used in America. Power companies can't tolerate more than that because those green sources fluctuate too much. This cap and trade bill is an economy killer for America. Many industries will flee to countries where they don't have such onerous fuel taxes. Bye, bye jobs. China isn't afraid of coal. They build 1 new coal plant every 10 days, and we will be getting the brown cloud from them whether we believe in coal or not.
oilhammer04 2 years ago
What is the thermostat set on in the White house? I don't like leaders trying kill our economy by over taxing fuel to reduce the use of it, while living it up in comfort provided by fuel. I'll believe these guys have some integrity when I see them walking or riding in rickshaws.
oilhammer04 2 years ago
guess whos going to pay for this scheme
1kel40b 2 years ago
What the hell are you people thinking? Do you not see what is going to happen to your way of life? Just your electric bill alone will go up 90%.
texasc4 2 years ago
I would like to declare June 27 as burn a tire day!
yammyspeed13 2 years ago
Why is TRNN supporting this "global warming is caused by human produced CO2" hoax?
Why don't they spend more time on the scientists around the world, who claim that the SUN is causing the global warming and the rise of CO2 levels and NOT the other way around.
I guess they're not so "independent" as they claim to be.
CCLJunky 2 years ago
Thought of the day? If you remove all CO2 from the air. Not one life form would be left on this planet. On the other hand you have too much CO2 Plants and Animals will grow larger just like the time of the Dinosaurs.
h82sk8 2 years ago
Indications are that microbes can turn coal into natural gas(coal bed methane).
If true, why burn coal at all?
Also
If we look at every waste as a resource perhaps we can stop throwing away resources. Why sequester CO2 in the ground when it can be turned into food, fuel, building material,ext..?
abram730 2 years ago
global warming is a western imperialist scam to prevent 3rd world countries from developing under the cover of environmentalism.
global warming can be debunked in 5 minutes by anybody with half a brain. there really is no controversy about it. it's a open and shut case. there is no man-made global warming period.
why do you think the capitalists, who have destroyed the environment during the last 100 years are now championing GW, and ignoring flouride, GMOs, aspartame, mercury.. etc..?
markiz2001 2 years ago
global warming is a scam. figure it out.
you left wingers call us "conspiracy theorists", but you have no problem believing the conspiracy theory that oil companies are purposely manipulating the science to deny global warming, simply because that is the easiest and simplest explanation. well guess what, just because it's the simplest explanation doesn't make it true. try using your brains and a bit of sophistication like your enemies, to realise there are other explanations
markiz2001 2 years ago
Two words shut this down: "peer review." People don't seem to understand that serious scientists devoted to the principles of objectivity review one another's work even before it gets published. For instance, if I'm a geologist in Egypt, I have a colleague in Thailand and we 'peer review' each other's work. Or we both travel to a third location, the north pole maybe, and send our data to another set of peers for their review. Then we compile it all, etc. The same for other sciences.
siradam575 2 years ago
"peer review" is like peer pressure, it is meant to silence dissenting voices and impose majority bias.
the scientific community has been thoroughly discredited and proven that it is politically controlled, incompetent and not to be trusted.
you practice "authoritarian thinking" and therefore you believe whatever the authorities say, even though the evidence clearly shows otherwise.
markiz2001 2 years ago
I'd like to know your evidence as to HOW the scientific community has been discredited and is politically controlled.
As for incompetent, where do you get your electricity from? Where do you keep food? What transportation do you use? Have you ever been to a doctor?
What evidence shows otherwise? You just keep ranting without any evidence, references, or justifications. Its no wonder you know so little about the scientific method.
You've bought into something that you need to question.
siradam575 2 years ago
oh, stfu you retard.
FreakishDonQuixote 2 years ago
IF they do cap and trade (and I think its a stupid idea). Dont give just corporations credits, give every person on the planet X amount of credits who can then sell them to the highest bidders. Let the people of the world get in on this ponsi sceme too!
robcrussiii 2 years ago
Has anyone here heard that the entire solar system is heating up? NASA is aware of it and it has been covered briefly by the US news media. Even if we cut all of our carbon emissions tomorrow we would still have a warming planet. Global warming is a two fold problem. The first deals with increased solar output which is heating up the solar system. The second is our exacerbation of the problem by our choice to use carbon based fuels. We will be on oil for at least another 50 years minimum.
fywacia 2 years ago
A little more help look it up Air Car...!
DaughterofEarthanSky 2 years ago
From the UN Climate Change Conference:
Urban EcoMap is the name of a free, web-based tracking tool that will allow everybody to check out the size of everybody elses carbon footprint.
The map tracks carbon emissions from energy, waste and transportation based on zip code.
Developed nations should cut their greenhouse gas emissions by at least 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2020, China repeated last week.
See my video for site. love,p
phnixlady 2 years ago
You seem to think that those who believe that global warming is anthropogenic do so only because Al Gore believes the same. It so happens that the majority (and near entirety) of climate scientists support the anthropogenic theory, and unless you are similarly trained in climate science, you have no credentials to dispute that consensus. Solar radiation is a possible theory, but the majority of climate scientists dismiss it for several good reasons. It's uncertain, so don't be arrogant.
prognost 2 years ago
There are many researchers who don't believe in man made global warming, but they are ignored by the media and have their funding pulled. This issue is not science, its politics.
FarangBalls 2 years ago
They probably the same types who believe the world is no older then 6000 years old
AmNotHere911 2 years ago
thats hilarious. Well since you think you are causing global warming wht have you done personally to reduce your carbon emmission? you are still using electricity since youre on the computer.. you are murdering the planet man!
FarangBalls 2 years ago
Solar panels on my house, growing a portion of my own food, not eating meat, walking/riding a bike where feasible, making sure my home/vehicle is as fuel efficient as possible, which also means not 'keeping up with the joneses' by buying into excess, etc. Many small things that all add up in the end.
siradam575 2 years ago
I want to do these things also but I dont believe in man made global warming either. The government is the biggest liar. Everything they talk about is just to get more money and give that money to special interest groups. Carbon Tax....
FarangBalls 2 years ago
It's called Carbon Neutral: You should try it, you could begin by generating your own energy by adding solar panels to your roof or a wind turbine...that's a start is it not?
AmNotHere911 2 years ago
Can you name any of these scientists?
siradam575 2 years ago
The Pacific Research Institute made their own video debunking Al Gore's movie. Look it up here in youtube or googlevideo: An Inconvenient Truth... or Convenient Fiction?
FarangBalls 2 years ago
Who's to stop rich fucks from getting sweet deals on carbon emissions? You never know. Some clubs get special deals. Crooked bureaucracy.
samuelmichaud 2 years ago 4
thats right. just like income tax. set the blanket default as to taxable, and then make exemptions be selective, so that those that know as well as secret societies that have legislative exemption can get away with it.
why not have the default set to no tax, and then have selective taxes on certain items, excise taxes, since they dont get apportioned?
they like the default blanket method. whether its cap or soc, the top always have a loophole
gwho 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
samuelmichaud 2 years ago
Yeah there's no way to tax the rich.
You'd have to threaten their lives, their power.
You'd have to be more powerful than they are to do this.
Average people buy the dogma. They get their taxes taxed. But they never fight back because they think they'll be biting the hand that feeds.
Others are sick of it and are ready to fight back, but fail to engage because their forces are too small.
We're already in the trap, unless some riot miracle happens, we won't be saving the world from consumption.
samuelmichaud 2 years ago 2
From what I understand, global warming is still a controversial subject within the scientific community, so I don't see why we should to try to solve a problem that we don't even know is real.
VolcanicPenguin 2 years ago
Maybe it'S about control! It's obvious how the "free allowance" is like a grandfathering clause. You operate a huge coal plant, no problem! You get a free allowance, only FUTURE coal plants will get the carbon tax. This is bullshit, if you have grandfathering on these old technologies you won't solve global warming.
It's obvious this push isn't at all to do with global warming, it has to do with either enriching banks(trading, derivatives) or some sick social engineering program.
Renegen1 2 years ago
I agree completely.
VolcanicPenguin 2 years ago
We had a a HOUSING DERIVATIVE BUBBLE that burst. Now, we will have a GREEN ENERGY DERIVATIVE BUBBLE. When will the bubble burst to destroy the rest of the American business? Oh, by the way, Obama has stock in the cap and trade scam. Obama will make a killing off this scam. This is NOT the time or place for a huge tax affecting the WHOLE entire U.S.
bbnemesis123 2 years ago
How about they release those secret technologies they're hiding.
gdernie 2 years ago
they should tax the bullshit that comes out of their mouths!
P3coTrain 2 years ago 4
The tax of humanity, this is.
Elmeromero1 2 years ago
$1 per fart
banjojambo9 2 years ago
You took a breath! that's $5
shenmueryu 2 years ago 2
Nice. Every comment is calling bullshit on all this control grid.
MankindCartoons 2 years ago
This is nothing but a new tax. It will drive more jobs overseas to china where they couldn't care less about this supposed global warming BS. Creating even more global pollution. If this is "global warming" Then the best way to handle this would be to bring the jobs back here form china where our ecology efforts are far better.
This is just another excuse to raise taxes on the poor. Contact your representative and demand they vote NO!!!!!
RAPSUCKS1738 2 years ago
write your company of choice to bring some jobs bavk, and send your pc to taiwan.
thx 4 input
Realizalize 2 years ago
I think you missed my point
RAPSUCKS1738 2 years ago
nope, it is exact.
how do you think industry and production
gets money to invest? my guess they get it from banks, all of them.
what you are told is the same we were told before,
and the reason for huge cutbacks in wages and pensions and such, bla bla bla
i am not thinking of myself as a hostage, untill
someone like you comes along.
Realizalize 2 years ago
I know you missed my point
RAPSUCKS1738 2 years ago
#mr. nike-dude wrote his dissertation on outsourcing, and that is what he did, and what addidas did, too; yugoslavia, indonesia, vietnam
were producing shoes.
basically they threaten ppl to source out job in order to push costs down, which they do, and then bancrupt again, so ppl gave up money, for nothing.
Realizalize 2 years ago
Well just like you say they could care less and these taxes don't apply to places like china because they won't agree to this garbage. They know it is fraud and the money is going to special interest groups like the one al gore himself runs. Pay him taxes so he can keep fueling his jet to fly everywhere making more co2 emissions than all of us allegedly and preaching about how bad we are for using cars to get to work when work is 45 min to an hour away. He is a douche bag and all of the others
shenmueryu 2 years ago
Exactly
RAPSUCKS1738 2 years ago
ARRRGGHGHHH!
What a SCAM!
chewbaca1989 2 years ago
All this regulation has nothing to do with dangerous emissions. Its about reducing the population along with other regulations in the pipeline in order to control growth. People need to look at everything how it will effect them to marginalised for the benifit of a few who make these regulations. You will be made POOR, TAXED, UNDEREDUCATED, PRISONED, MADE UNHEALTHY, and INSURED with a EARLY DEATH if you let a few POPULATION CONTROL MANAGERS RULE YOU. Start thinking PEOPLE with these LIARS!!
POWERequalsGOD 2 years ago
its just a scam to make money
nothing to to do with environment..
RomeoMD25 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
just another tax
its the sun heating up not only the earth but other planets as well
coal can be clean
next they will tax your farts
sterling motors,listeriods,bio diesel,parabolic collectors, alluminum alloy gallium and h2o batteries,small nuke steam, joe cells,tide generators,
hydro electric, gasification,.....all work but cant be controlled by the elite... not yet
koch46 2 years ago
Carbon offsets, there's a funny notion.
Climate change and global warming was a theory back in the 1960's. It's still a theory, but it seems to be happening faster than anybody expected.
If we want to change the physical trend, we will need a global moratorium on all forms of combustion, for at least 200 years. Even matches and candles could be outlawed.
To change the effective policy however, I doubt even a nuke-you-lure war would make any difference.
950horsepower 2 years ago 2
yeah lets hand it over to the derivatives market, that has worked so well in the past ^^
random0815 2 years ago 2
Obama and his market-based solutions. Good God.
MarquisdeBarrabas 2 years ago
"co-discoverer of global warming" ... wtf? Someone in your staff has to study some science! I doubt one could say that Hansen discovered global warming. It was a gradual process over the past three decades of research by thousands of scientists - and fitting the pieces together one-by-one, they did the IPCC-report based on their vast research. But no single one "discovered" global warming!
Toji85 2 years ago 4
But Al Gore invented the internet right? Lol, great point Toji
dixon36 2 years ago
they shold tax the companies that prodce the co2 and not the customers!
also dont plants breath carbon dioxid??
happosai27 2 years ago
exactly! let the plants pay for the mess, they had a free ride for far too long! ^^
random0815 2 years ago
Why yes they do...and they exhale oxygen and for us visa-versa
shenmueryu 2 years ago
this whole policy seems more like a rip off to make money and to raise cost of living for small people even more than it is now already..
happosai27 2 years ago
And to enrich the banks! The debate USED to be about the best way to "save the planet".
Now looking at how Obama forced cap & trade into the discussion, it's obvious that this is being pushed by bigger powers than him. I watched the Davos conference on climate change, they said so themselves the only obstacle to global cap & trade is the US. With the volatility of prices it does ZERO to promote green energy.
Renegen1 2 years ago
The answer to global warming and other pollutions is less people. However since due to greed no one wants to do the obvious and do away with cars and other things that produce greenhouse gases then we suffer the consequences; the mother Earth will kill us off anyway with air pollution, water pollution, massive hurricanes, droughts, food shortages and other environmental ills. So keep playing the political game and ignore it. We need to lose five billion people that pollute.
pongman 2 years ago
Reminds me of the old car commercial for Fram oil filters. "you can pay me now or pay me later" Where the advertiser tells the customer while working on an engine with his hands greasy with grime you need to change the oil filter and pay the small cost or pay the bigger cost to do a more expensive job of rebuilding your engine.
pongman 2 years ago
So help the world and kill yourself.
TheTruthHurts732 2 years ago
yeah sicko, lets kill 5 billion so the 300 million premium humans can continue to drive SUVs! right now we produce enough food to support 12 billion people, our biomass on the planet is equivalent to ants - are they overpopulating as well? did you study biology, medicine, geography and meteorology to make the claim 5 billion people have to die? funny how most of the people that usually invoke "overpopulation" have no expertise in either one
random0815 2 years ago
They say the magic number is ten billion but with sacrifices. We chop down more trees to create more space for agriculture, desalinate the ocean water but that entails using more energy. Keeping everyone on a two thousand calorie diet a day. One car per household, etc... It really doesn't matter because the planet will balance the equation for us; unless we do it ourselves. We really need a nuclear war to help wipe out the excess population so the strong can survive. lol
pongman 2 years ago
yeah north koreans! who is they? the voices in your head? there are countless solution already in full existance, portable water filters that can filter virtually anything, farming highrises that multiply ground by the hundreds, hydroponics, new solar aso., its absurd to say where the limit would be if everything remains as it is
random0815 2 years ago
Yeah, yeah, yeah. But it's far easier to start a war and wipe out people, then the rest of us that are still alive can enjoy the fresh air and clean water. After all this other technology cost money and then the poor will die anyway because they can't afford the technology. Would you rather sacrifice a poor American when we can wipe out another country's population with a neutron bomb? lol
pongman 2 years ago
Global warming is a scam . Its a set up phase and will be included in the rescue package they bring in to sucker us into continue being slaves
RICK360000 2 years ago
carbon is a polluter...??? that's a good one....!!! carbon tax is a pure fascists take over ,nothing more !!! oh yeah ...; its GENOCIDE too,,,, !!!!
tepstolog 2 years ago
Ahhh yes... Cap and TAX....
NYredwhiteandblue 2 years ago
very informative
azhar8c 2 years ago
Cap and Trade, a group of inverters buys a Kansas Power Plant and sells the Excess pollution output to NY at $50 a ton and charges its customer base in Kansas $50 a ton for what they pollute. If they oversell and need more power they have to either buy power or buy back more CO2 permits, we hope at the $50 ton rate (don't hold your Breath), either way the Kansas Customers pay for NY power use. Current claims are that it will Cost 10 to 12 Dollars a ton, who believes that will be the price?
ubuibiok 2 years ago 2
I cant believe how fucking stupid people are to believe in this bullshit!!!
Is this what you call Real News??
wizkid2000 2 years ago
I cant believe someone judges a video before watching it. The Real News presented both sides of the issue, and yes it has some merits and huge demerits. I guess people like you are unconvertable with fair and balanced reporting I suggest you go back to your fox news and other MSM crap. The shock of seeing balanced reporting might kill you.
uche007us 2 years ago 3
What merits does cap and trade have?
wizkid2000 2 years ago
the rare chance of accelerating the discovery of an alternative form of energy. I dont think it will, but it can happen
uche007us 2 years ago 3
Thats only really valuable if you believe this global warming nonsense.
And I got to say I really dont expect a balanced view from a video titled "Cap and trade won't cut it", it seems to suggest that cap and trade doesn't go far enough instead of questioning the basic premise for the need for it.
wizkid2000 2 years ago
Cap and trade should only include the top 100 polluters. The rest just get in the way... also, then we could make sure that the costs aren't simply passed on to us!
mozidigital 2 years ago
mozidigital, "we could make sure that the costs (of Cap & Trade) aren't simply passed on to us (by corporations)!
Where do you think corporations get their money from, the money tree? Get real.
gsuitter 2 years ago
Corporations make profit by ignoring environmental costs. This is where they get their profits from! and we pay the bill to clean up after them...check the "polluter pays principle" in international law
mozidigital 2 years ago
Advising people to adopt more and have less children has never been advised, and of course, why should it be advised? A government's job is to rob people with excuses.
Governments are monopoly machines, they take place because people are too stupid to manage themselves, except for a few who are denied freedom and have to live in "nations" together with pathetic sheeple.
asperin 2 years ago 2
Poor you.
Here's an idea: More to Somalia or a deserted island or wherever there is no 'guvmint' and stop polluting the «sheeple's» YouTube comment pages.
MarquisdeBarrabas 2 years ago
Hey Marquis de Barraberga:
Listen, in Somalia the ruling faction is anyone with the guns, and those people, if given the chance, they would form a State and become the Government.
They know nothing about Free Market Anarchism, they are just lazy as fuck and a bunch of thieves.
asperin 2 years ago
A deserted island it is then.
Go for it.
MarquisdeBarrabas 2 years ago
The cost of doing nothing FAR outweights the cost of taxation.
FreakishDonQuixote 2 years ago 3
not true. the cost of doing nothing is nothing.
the cost of doing something is billions or trillions of dollars wasted, which will cause starvation, poverty, misery.
go ahead, and commit genocide because you are too spupid to figure out you are being lied to. whether it's about iraq/iran wmd or co2.
markiz2001 2 years ago
If you choose nothing, you still have made a choice. And how is being a responsible and respectful life form committing genocide?
siradam575 2 years ago
If Obama is for it then its has to be a bad idea. He is already a thoroughly discredited man.
Telcontar1962 2 years ago
for those who believe obama will shield low income people from paying a disproportionate amount of this money, then perhaps you also still believe that soon these wars will end, and soon the illegal detentions will end, and soon the NSA will stop spying on us without warrants. if this is you, then know that i envy the blissful ignorance you exist in. i truly do.
callieland 2 years ago 12
we exhale carbon dioxide and they tell us now that this is an environmental toxin. so indeed we will be taxed to breathe. have you not heard that ranchers will be taxed for the flatulence of every cow and pig they own? did you not hear this gentleman tell us that 85% of carbon taxes will be "giveaways" to big corporate interests? and even the companies who pay their carbon taxes will simply crank up the price of their product so that the common man will shoulder nearly the entire burden.
callieland 2 years ago
cap and trade, carbon credits, swaps etc... whatever the term of the day is are a bad idea. once again it allows the haves to do as they please while penalizing the have nots.
turkeyjurker 2 years ago 2
Someone ask this moron what each one of his breaths are going to cost. Or ask him howmuch he will pay per fart. I mean seriously he is totally dancing around the topic to make it sound nice. I will never pay this tax. It is time to come together round up these morons and put them on trial. Start with Ale Gore for saying these lies.
Edgrot 2 years ago
We'll have to rely on Godzilla to come and save the Human Race!
peymaania 2 years ago
Godzilla will save the day!
peymaania 2 years ago 2