Why are most independents are just GOP memebers claiming to be both dem nd repub when really they are republicans? Fuck the libratarians , independents conservatives, they are part the Gay Old Party DRdisaster007 is right.
More of the same, just the GOP making another non-white look like a terrorist, the whole fear thing. Same sh!t, same red meat, same lies, all to feed the fears of the simple minded. You know, their base.
Totally agree that he's a moron. But he's a republican, and he's not racist.
It's unfair to brand all republicans racist. I used to be a republican, and certainly was never a racist. I think that the crowd took over GOP just knows how to use racism to win elections, which is just as bad.
Also, notice the little "balancing act" at the end of the story, the little weasel (IMHO) newcaster just had to make sure that all was "fair & balanced" with his snide comment "so what you're saying is that politics is dirty", in other words, "no big deal, everybody plays dirty, so this a non-story".
Typical, God forbid a news program should do a story
that simply reports that a Republican candidate is running a dirty campaign; can't do that 'cause then you're the evil Liberal media™.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Democrats are the ones who seem to have problems with dark skin, not Republicans. I mean, so what if Paulsen's skin is darker, does that make him a bad person? Give me a break.
This is no different than Democrats saying to McCain, "No, Obama's not a Muslin, but so what if he was?" Now I say Democrats, "No Ashwin Paulsen is not that dark, but so what if he was?"
So Democrats are racists because they complain when a Republican lies or distorts a Democrats' image to make them look like someone a racist wouldn't vote for.
I don't know that his skin was intentionally darkened. They blurred his face, like is often done in negative ads. The claims of the ad should alarm people. The courses they cited are over two years old. Madia wasn't running then, and I think he was still in Iraq, so the connection between those sources and Madia is awfully dubious. Besides, Madia clearly is advocating tax increases only on incomes over $250,000. Agree or don't, but don't lie about what he's advocating.
Why are most independents are just GOP memebers claiming to be both dem nd repub when really they are republicans? Fuck the libratarians , independents conservatives, they are part the Gay Old Party DRdisaster007 is right.
carnypimp 9 months ago
GOP
GAY OLD PARTY
DRdisaster007 2 years ago
Ah, some things never change.
dybeen 3 years ago
Not a close election again!!! Find out why you should be very concerned at Musicians4Obama. Let's make it surface - thank you for passing it on!
Musicians4Obama 3 years ago
I can't believe 40+% of Americans support these Douchebaggery Repugnicans
ROOKTABULA 3 years ago
More of the same, just the GOP making another non-white look like a terrorist, the whole fear thing. Same sh!t, same red meat, same lies, all to feed the fears of the simple minded. You know, their base.
BigBox 3 years ago 2
Yup. They're Republicans. That's how they operate.
mistergarth 3 years ago 4
ever meet a republican who wasn't a racist?
neither have i.
^
JoeCantwell 3 years ago 4
Ever met Alan Keyes.
roflcopter2006 3 years ago
well Alan Keys is a disgrace to the world & not just to the African American community. The man is a moron.
chico30144 3 years ago
Totally agree that he's a moron. But he's a republican, and he's not racist.
It's unfair to brand all republicans racist. I used to be a republican, and certainly was never a racist. I think that the crowd took over GOP just knows how to use racism to win elections, which is just as bad.
roflcopter2006 3 years ago
And your point?
mmm413 3 years ago
Also, notice the little "balancing act" at the end of the story, the little weasel (IMHO) newcaster just had to make sure that all was "fair & balanced" with his snide comment "so what you're saying is that politics is dirty", in other words, "no big deal, everybody plays dirty, so this a non-story".
Typical, God forbid a news program should do a story
that simply reports that a Republican candidate is running a dirty campaign; can't do that 'cause then you're the evil Liberal media™.
XavierNinnis 3 years ago 5
Thank you!!! That was exactly my thought. What a little FoxNews douchebag.
HerzogD 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Democrats are the ones who seem to have problems with dark skin, not Republicans. I mean, so what if Paulsen's skin is darker, does that make him a bad person? Give me a break.
This is no different than Democrats saying to McCain, "No, Obama's not a Muslin, but so what if he was?" Now I say Democrats, "No Ashwin Paulsen is not that dark, but so what if he was?"
NomadicAddict 3 years ago
So Democrats are racists because they complain when a Republican lies or distorts a Democrats' image to make them look like someone a racist wouldn't vote for.
senorfish4 3 years ago 4
I don't know that his skin was intentionally darkened. They blurred his face, like is often done in negative ads. The claims of the ad should alarm people. The courses they cited are over two years old. Madia wasn't running then, and I think he was still in Iraq, so the connection between those sources and Madia is awfully dubious. Besides, Madia clearly is advocating tax increases only on incomes over $250,000. Agree or don't, but don't lie about what he's advocating.
webcelt 3 years ago 3