Daniel Frederick Wallace, Sky Three ( 911 Truth ) Part 1

[Super0ger]

I'm only watching this because the British guy from assassins creed is narrating this.........

[TheHerman8r]

I watched this when it was originally aired ...Still Awesome :D

[william899332]

whats the prenters name ?

[911LIGHT]

is there a part two??

[scottishcreamthe1st]

I hope not...lol

[sayomsskiver]

Yeah,.. you might have already seen it, it's been uploaded.

to think ppl believe that arabs did it, it's funny. It's like Nero, ppl don't history because the education system is useless nowadays.

[scottishcreamthe1st]

lol... this suppresses so much about the reason 911 was an inside job its laughable.

[getorphan]

I agree. should i bother to watch the rest of this series? Any new facts about the 911 government scam on these vids? I can't tell what side this guy is on yet. He seems to playing the part of the objective journalist trying to present both sides. There is only one side here: the government did it and is covering up a massive crime.

[sayomsskiver]

you believe bush? and your government when time after time they lie to you.

[fuckinshite0]

9 fuckin 11 was a inside job soooooomuch fuckin evidence against the government fuck sake if i take a loaf of bread without consent im fucked u blow up a building and know 1 suspects u wtf

[911Ins1dejob]

9/11 was an inside job, 9/11 was an inside job, 9/11 was an inside job, 9/11 was an inside job, 9/11 was an inside job, 9/11 was an inside job, 9/11 was an inside job, 9/11 was an inside job, 9/11 was an inside job,

[DoomHippie]

You guys give WAY too much credit to the government. Bush is not some all powerful superbeing. Come on! Conspiracy jerks dishoner those who died!

[NeverShowerNever]

@DoomHippie dude watch 1 documentary you'll be convinced

[DoomHippie]

@NeverShowerNever

I did watch a documentary. It was made by scientists, engineers and architects, not high school students.

But, I do have a question for conspiracy theorists like you! Why go through all the effort to rig a building to explode, and then crashing a plane into it and detonating it, when you could simply just crash a plane into it and have the same effect?

[FREEAMERICANOW69]

@DoomHippie

because donald rumsfied was in the pentagon, and wtc buildings were designed to take a crash from 747.

[DoomHippie]

@FREEAMERICANOW69

What? No it was NOT. That is not even factually possible. The WTC was designed in 1960 and construction started in 1966 The Boeing 747 was designed in 1966 and the first one was constructed in 1969. The Towers were completed in 1973. That means, according to you, that the WTC designers planned to allow the structure to take impact from a plane that would not be built until 3 whole years later? Your logic does not follow.

[FREEAMERICANOW69]

@DoomHippie

911 Towers Designed/built 4 hit by Boeing 747 True or false?

youtube com/watch?v=E15GbdVaV-Q

maybe it wasn't designed for 747, but in this video, structural engineer, Charlie Thornton said in 1986 that a 747 wouldn't destroy it, and his statement coincides with the many engineers and architects in the truth movement...even though he changed his story in 2009.

[DoomHippie]

@FREEAMERICANOW69

The head structural engineer also said on 9/11 that he knew instantly what had happened. The towers were built using a tube-frame structural design, which means the entire structure pivoted around one main support pillar. Without that pillar, the entire thing would collapse. Thus, if a plane hits the central pillar, the tower would collapse.

[FREEAMERICANOW69]

@DoomHippie

prove it.

it still doesn't support the lack of evidence of a plane crash.

[DoomHippie]

@FREEAMERICANOW69

Google Tube-Frame Structural System. Then Google WTC tower structural design to verify that the towers use Tube-Frame Structure.

And as for lack of evidence of a plane crash? How about a video of the plane crashing into the tower?

[FREEAMERICANOW69]

@DoomHippi

YEAH, THE LACK OF A PLANE CRASH FOR THE PENTAGON.

[DoomHippie]

@FREEAMERICANOW69

Ah that. You do realize that, first and foremost, there was eyewitnesses to that event that saw an airplane hit the pentegon?

[FREEAMERICANOW69]

@DoomHippie

google: lack of proof that the plane hit the pentagon

[DoomHippie]

@FREEAMERICANOW69

Umm, EYEWITNESSES to the event trumps your lack-of-a-plane-shaped-hole and lack of solid footage.

Plus, why waste a missile? Why wouldn't the government just hijack another plane and ACTUALLY drive it into the pentagon? Why the extra layer of deceit?

[FREEAMERICANOW69]

@DoomHippie

and the names are?

when footage of a lack of a plane trumps your claims.

[beckyfromkentucky]

Wallace is a tool.