Added: 1 year ago
From: AtlasExperimentMusic
Views: 17,206
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (63)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i want to go to the cern and piss in it

  • @hegemoniuspiper be careful not to release too many pisitrons, that will make a blackhole out of CERN

  • @ahmedshinwari yes maybe the pissitrons r the only key to the famous higg's field, without which everything is massless and yellow

  • why is this video so quiet? its upsetting, like those shows that blare commercials way louder than the show

  • Oh god, how can there be so many stupid people commenting on this? I think I'm going back to TED-talks' site.

  • wishful thinking....

    

  • 1. The notion most people have of the word 'mass' is 'quantity of matter'. This version has been debunked...

    .

    youstupidrelativist com/05SR/02Mass/03QMatter.html

  • 2. Mass is a CONCEPT! Mass is NOT a physical object. Therefore, the mathematicians at the LHC are now trying to find the particle of a concept. The mathematicians have already discovered the particle of time (chronon) and of sound (phonon).

    .

    en.wikipedia org/wiki/Chronon

    en.wikipedia org/wiki/Phonon

    .

    What's next? A particle of love? Of justice? Of course a particle of weight cannot exist!!!! But don't tell that to the folks at Harvard and Cambridge!

  • @bgaede particle of surprise LOL

  • @gitaarman1956 u mean like when a black hole is form there is so much energy it creates a new universe so parrel universe

  • I think that the Higgs particle does not exist. One must ask 'why did the Big-Bang happen?' I have an idea that big-bangs happen in the centre of black holes. The pressure is so dense, that for particles there is only one way to escape. They change their vibration to an incredibly high number and become pure energy. Now energy wants to unload like thunderlightning and it seeks it's opponent pole, which is the outside of the same black hole. Than a new scaled spacetime is born. Just an idea.

  • @gitaarman1956 Go to Quora.com and put your idea to the experts - fantastic answers!

  • This "Higgs field" theory seems very reminiscent of the "luminiferous ether" theory.

  • @jimmicreesti cool, did you read A Brief History of Time too? fantastic book, btw.

  • @EZtrollin yes, though it was a classic scientific 'blunder' - great experiment though. I remember it better from a Jim Al' Khalili BBC doc, Everything & Nothing. I unqualifiably suspect this 'Higgs' may well be a similar scientific dead-end.

  • @jimmicreesti i honestly find the notion of dark matter a little appalling, rather than to say "oh, one of equations must be wrong" they said " oh, there must be some un- accounted for variable that has screwed with our calculations, even though it's invisible and has never been previously encountered or detected".

  • Anyone else thinking that the first minute much sounds like yet another lame story of creation? This is clearly not the best science has to offer.

  • @realisoph simply because it sounds similar to another "story" of creation doesn't mean that our current theories aren't based upon observations.

  • it's like the ether they used to think that light passed through

  • @EZtrollin Oh wow, first page - you already wrote that. So we might be thinkin the same thing...

  • maybe matter is just the result of the twisting of space time, translated into 3 dimensions.

  • Ok. So there was a big bang right?

    What was going on before the big bang?

    Where did this big bang happen?

    What exactly went bang?

    ........

    Seriously if there was no time, no space, no matter, no energy, why was there all of a sudden a big bang?

    Al this big bang bollox, makes no more sense to me, than the morons who say a man in a frock made it all in 7 days.

  • I MUST GO TO CERN AND SEE THE LARGE HADRON COLLIDER IN MY LIFETIME!!!!!!!

  • @ANGER7violetflame it really is our cultures great pyramid

  • The big bang is probably the stupidest theory ever. I believe in evolution and a lot of scientific theorys but just because I believe them I dont have to believe this.

  • @Tinsletooth I'd love to read some of your research or scholarly papers explaining an alternative to what is at the moment the best theory explaining the cosmos. And if you don't have an alternative, perhaps some major concerns other than "stupid" would suffice. Otherwise shut the fuck up.

  • @tekproxy Do you believe in god? Oh really you don't? Where are your theology papers? Is not God a theory too? Both have "evidence" proving they exist. People used to believe the earth was flat, that was a theory too. What make you think that their is only one option and that is to believe what you are told? You are such a sheep. Every leading scientist went against the flow of their modern science so before you think you are smart just know that you are incapable of being a pioneer. You sheep.

  • @Tinsletooth No, I don't believe in God. Did you even read the words man? If you think the big bang is stupid, say something a little more, because it's like saying "i think relativity is stupid". Well jackoff, there's plenty of evidence that anyone can look up supporting the big bang. Do you have any alternative theories to explain the evidence? Why do you not accept the big bang? Oh, sorry, should I call you some names too? :D

  • @Narftaxaku200 That is essentially what I said! Except that my explanation is slightly deeper. Mass is a rate of divergence, and gravity is a fundamental property of QM as seen in the Young's double slit experiment.

  • Crap !

  • Hayyyyeeee! 

  • haha thanks man, cool video, very interesting :) congrats on creating such a cool vid :)

  • They will never find it because it does not exist.

  • @2tame4fame That's why they are close to finding it, right?

  • The higgs boson does not exist. Mass is due to the divergence of space. This divergence creates extra space which increases the probability that the particle will move in that direction. I haven't gotten around to writing a paper on it yet, but when I do it will fundamentally change physics.

  • @ThinkTank255 ofc it does

  • @ThinkTank255 mass creates gravity and this last one deforms the space time continuum!

  • Great video. Some strange comments below.

  • We don't need to go that deep. But you are right. I tried to tell that there is other cosmic model. It is not the ultimate answer ineed, but has far more rational answers about cosmos. The first non-sci-fi, just the facts that humanity already know, but most of it has been banned. Just like Tesla's experiments because were too dangerous for us. I talk about Plasma cosmology. It's like Tesla's free energy for everyone or the hydrogen cars which do exist but it has been banned. You know why.

  • This is ridiculous. When scientists do not know about somehing, they simply imagine it and then starts to looking for it. Without observations, proofs, or any facts. And they are feeding the masses with their imaginations and mystic theories. Galaxy doesn't spin as they shoud. It doesn't fit to their imagination how it shoud be and come up with another imagination... there have to be something more, we don't what it is but let's name it dark matter. Not to mention E=mc2 has proved to be wrong.

  • @ZajoSTi You think scientific imagination is ridiculous? Do you prefer the lack of imagination imposed by religions? Indeed, if you choose to 'believe', it's all so simple. God is all, nothing else needed. Long live the dark age!

    Apparently all the wars, deadly plagues and other 'heavenly' treats did not decimate this species enough so as to eradicate stupidity. Maybe we can manage to do it to ourselves, and disappear from the book of the universe like the lame dust mites that we are.

  • @utubepredator Standard model astrophysics and relligion is exactly the same. They both creates illusions and starts to believe them. Even we kill each other just for some pitty illusions in the case of religion. We have so much potential (Tesla, etc.) but we are also very primitive. If people has started questioning the world and understand it, we would have more key inventors like Da Vinci, Tesla, Bell, Ford.. But people are forbidden to think by means of dogma and all our potenial is in vein.

  • @ZajoSTi Religious illusions were always a perfect excuse for indiscriminate (mass) murders. Scientific "illusions" are just the proof that our level of knowledge is a work-in-progress. Science NEVER claimed to possess the absolute truth like religions, instead it stays open to revisions, corrections etc etc. And science is about logic, not about blind belief and submission.

  • @ZajoSTi And the dogmas you mentioned are only the fault of people, not of science, because simplicity & belief are easy to deal with, but complexity & thinking are hard...

    Want another parallel? Science is more like the ideal of democracy, while religions are virtually dictatorships. How can you say religion and mainstream science are the same?!

    Unless you are a troll.

  • @utubepredator What a bullshit, "belief is easy and thinking is hard"... we think in order to acquire knowledge, which is justified true BELIEF. If you knew anything of epistomology you would know that. Many self-declared-more-rational atheists want to supress religious freedom, what is tantamount to dictatorship. There are many uneducated atheists, who simply repeat what they listen as parrots, without actually understanding what they say. Saying "there's no proof" is very simple

  • @synergyzer07 If you wanna play the philosopher, start with yourself. You make too many assumptions: I'm talking of science vs religion, yet you assume I'm an atheist. Technically I'm only agnostic (we all are).

    I agree on the parrot uneducated atheists, then again many smart-asses enjoy raising the 'ultimate point' - u 2 maybe?

    I know & admit science ain't perfect, but between 'justified true belief' & blind submission to absolutism, I'd go with the smaller evil. Look at history.

  • @ZajoSTi

    When scientists do not know about something, they simply imagine it and then starts (sic) to looking for it."

    How else should they proceed? All they can do is make some intelligent guesses (imagination guided by already-known facts) and test them; if the tests fail, they know to look somewhere else.

    There are at least 4 separate types of observation that are all explained by dark matter. We don't know what it is, but there's a lot of evidence that dark matter is real.

  • @ZajoSTi

    Oh, and E=mc^2 is not wrong; it's just incomplete. This short equation neglects the second-order momentum term, because it is usually negligible. That it was a necessary part of this equation was known from the beginning.

    When non-scientists do not know about something, they sometimes extrapolate from incomplete and often incorrect fragments of fact to reach conclusions that are trivially incorrect.

  • There are more particals they havent made public yet,which will prove Cern to be invaluable tool. How to make gold will be a thing of the past.. Things are going to get interesting..soon.

  • What absolute rubbish

  • @tenbear5 rubbish that makes possible for you to spew your non sense on a computer... Fucking hypocrit...

  • Comment removed

  • Every force has a particle, but really gravity isn't a force it's an interaction. The Higgs is fundamental in understanding the universe, but it could also be a an undetectable field without a particle. Normally fields/forces have particles. However the Higgs field may be special in that, it has no particle representation, all of mass is a representation of the Higgs field. Although I maybe wrong I highly doubt they will find the Higgs boson.

  • @SH10JogaBonito Why do you say that gravity isn't a force? I'm pretty sure that the accepted four forces of nature are the weak and strong forces, electromagnetic force, AND gravitational. Only the fact that scientists at CERN haven't found the graviton yet isn't enough evidence to assume that gravity shouldn't be counted with the other fundamental forces of nature.

  • what about the graviton ?

  • and what if the hiigs field is a component of space time instead of being a parrtical?

  • Good vid, but you speak like a retard...who's gay, if that's even possible...

  • @sorryibrokethetrees Yes it's possible for mentally challenged people to be gay. And you're an asshole.

  • @saintmichaelsarmoury Don't feel bad, I suspect all americans talk that way. I've rarely heard an exception, and even in those cases I might have missed the retard quality.

    But that's what you get for living on the american continent, you're cut off from the world and you eventually fade away and become irrelevant, like the natives.

    True story :)

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more