Tunguska anti aircraft vehicle

[nocodnogod]

Chuck Norris called. He says he wants his toys back.

[wirbelsaule]

а-10 сосет однозначно

[Silme17]

жаль не показали сбивание воздушной мишени очередью...

[Barkas911]

@Silme17 Что ты хочешь чтоб тебе очередью сбили, уж не F22 ли ? ))) А кукурузники можно и без Тунгуски, рогаткой сбивать.

[Silme17]

@Barkas911 мне интересно посмотреть именно работу автопушками именно по воздушной мишени.

кстати рогаткой кукурузник не собьёшь.

[Barkas911]

@Silme17 Ну раз так интересно, то смотри именно работу автопушки именно по воздушной мишени. (youtube.com/watch?v=q8plCt5Z8­N4)

[Silme17]

@Barkas911 уже посмотрела, в другом месте

[LeSnoi31]

@Silme17 _www_._youtube._com_/watch?v=U­Y5sdagQFYs

[3536ize]

you are mistaken this system is designed to cover the troops and the infantry from low-flying targets! for more serious purposes there is a s-300 and s-400!!

[FABamx123]

the tugunska and shilka is the bests

[YURISAMARA]

Go to me...

I will show this tehnology on your's pate !....

(from Russia with love)

[alokraja1]

this system looks more sexy when it is firing its machine guns at full auto!

[kluivert666]

US has the best technology for making burgers

[scottwins2]

Very Nice I want one of these to play with. One problem this weapons system is highly vulnerable. guns are exposed, missiles are exposed and radar is highly exposed. Pretty, but not a very good weapons system. A Bradly would eat it for lunch.

[Zukhov1945]

@scottwins2 From what you say any antiair system is exposed... and it is true but for this usually AA vehicles stand behind the lines. AA vehicles are not meant to be close to the front. They are exposed to attacks from the air if the AA coverage is low but this is unlikely talking about Russia.

[scottwins2]

@Zukhov1945 I thought about that since I wrote that. When the radar is on then itslunchtime for the Wild Weasals

[101andrewj]

@Zukhov1945 exactly, these things are designed to keep up with the front lines and provide rear air cover, and if they ever were on the front, they would have escorts

[101andrewj]

@scottwins2 no shit, but this would destroy aircraft 100 times better then a m3a3, its not built for armor on armor engagements, altho i think some varient of the missiles can be fired at land targets, same with those cannons

[scottwins2]

@101andrewj I realy can't be comapreto the Bradly m3a3 its a armomored fighting vehicle, it carries troops, will take out two tanks easily with its two missles it carries, has some reflective armor, and its gun is for taking out light trucks, jeeps, blowing down cement walls and the like. a very different purpose on the batle field Give meet 20 m3a3 in the field over the Tunguska. The Russian piece would be good for protecting a bridge or a downtown area from aircraft. Eats alot of brass.

[scottwins2]

@101andrewj Hey andrew, if you want to see a real POS look at the Russian ZSU-57-2

[TheRedWarmachine]

@101andrewj lol yes it can be modified for an anti armour roll

[wg390]

This old russian piece of shit

Now Russians have 100 times better shit that this one LOL

I love Russians they are wonderful people !

[guigui1236]

one trillion bullets per minute !!!!

[P3RF3CTD3ATH]

The Tunguska is a piece of shit? Why was it a feared weapon during the Cold War by the West? It's stilled feared by many pilots in air forces around the world today.

[MrVeter71]

USA ПЕНДОСЫ-абортники:)!

[rus55odo79]

@MrVeter71 ЗОЛОТЫЕ СЛОВА!!

[fabriciobrisola1]

這是俄羅斯的模型！

[pooterhead1991]

i like this tank it looks cool just like i love the mi-28

[darth0nihilus1]

Смерть зергам!!!!!11111!!!!11

[R3furbished]

thats right baby, we blow the fuckers up before they even get off the ground :)

[mrprodigy83]

Good to have Russia between Europe and China.

[Bloodlust20101983]

@mrprodigy83 And which one are you? European or chinese?

[mrprodigy83]

@Bloodlust20101983

A profile visit and you got the answer.

[SlavaSvarogu]

@mrprodigy83 Way:))) Russians are funny nation they can make coridor:)))

[CopainTv]

Send some over to the Middle-East to bring down the cowardly US airforce. Lets see if they can fight without their precious air support.

[roosterm16]

the last thing, you will never see, is a tunguska!

[HamTheDog]

@fabriciobrisola1 我的名字是老總王東叮噹？

[HamTheDog]

@fabriciobrisola1 我的名字是丁冬頭

[HamTheDog]

@fabriciobrisola1 あなたはどのように行う？

[fabriciobrisola1]

@HamTheDog  很简单

[HamTheDog]

@HamTheDog 我是董萵嗯頭的人......喜喜？

[ARTURizTAGANA]

Tunguska best ё

[hilali82]

اثنين بواحد صواريخ ورشاااش يا عيني

[WahranRai]

why they dont sell some to Khadaffi !!!

[xmaster117]

AA vehicles are probably the most bad-ass military technology out there.

OK, besides anti-tank sniper rifles.

[mewatchvideo1234]

25 people don't know a what a kick ass AA platform is.

[178thbattlegroup]

@mewatchvideo1234 or they do, and know this POS isnt it.

[DiscordChaos]

@178thbattlegroup Yawn. You're probably just saying that because it's Russian.

[Eddshere17]

Greece: An angry crowd.

[snipermakedonski]

@marius5641 why?

[marius5641]

the level of radiations must be very high inside those vehicles

[Pyrojojo7]

Lol they see me spinnin'

[VegeRioN]

No more NATO UAV near Russian territory, LOL

[realisticsocialist]

I lol'ed at that active radar spinning so fast.

it looks hyperactive

[stranglehand]

l' armée francaise parais completement dépassé par cette puissance de feux , surtout que l' armée de terre a 44% de l' éffectif blindé qui ne marche pas :)

[ka2ed100]

@pulseofMaggotz1 its a anty aircraft !!! you need a t-90 to shoot your school :D

[500amigo]

Я дилетант в военной технике, но просто прочел описание на сайте разработчиков.

Красиво стреляют - это не пулеметы а 30-мм двуствольные пушки скорострельность 4810 выстрелов в минуту. Стреляют снарядами осколочно-фугасно-зажигательно­го типа.

принято на вооружение в 1982г.

I the layman in military technology, but have simply read the description on a site of developers.

Beautifully shoot - 30-mm double-barreled guns rate of fire of 4810 shots in a minute. Tunguska on arms with 1982г.

[hungreh1442]

damn russians are good......... NUKE

[mobius1aic]

0:31 pretty crazy!

[aurora7641]

@pulseofMaggotz1 I'd use T-90 or a well guided artillery barrage for a school ;)

[junkers87syuka]

does it have a chance against the F-22 RAPTOR,NIGHTHAWK,B2 SPIRIT,OR THE F-35 LIGHTNING all stealth aircraft

[TheMamonth]

@junkers87syuka Tunguska is low range anti-aircraft missile system. so, if they are in tunguska fire range, then even stealth mode won't help (cause stealth makes craft be invisible on radars, not in real life, cap. Obv).

However, what makes big trouble to load a far-ranged missile on aircraft? Russia uses different vehicles for tracking and taking down aircrafts on their own, because, if i am not mistaking, tunguska is for covering up a mass of land units as tanks, infrantry etc.

[VITOLLFOTOGRAFIA]

@junkers87syuka To the height that they never go this, any knows of the existence of other one, the war of this boy is against helicopters, to 10, etc

[scuba36fun]

@junkers87syuka I use to serve on Tunguska back in 1993, to answer your question: Tunguska is much more then just antiaircraft system. Yes, to all of your questions accept F-35, I simply don't know the specs of that aircraft.

See, Tunguska as a single unit won't be a deadly as a unit in a fighting group, because of it complicated and short range radar system, on a other hand the NATO radar systems have the same speed resolutions as Russian build.

[AlexanderDiArmani]

I want one!!!!

[HTCGratia]

Хороша машинка!

[kempmt1]

That's a system I wouldn't mind having in my arsenal.

[RegretForNothing]

USA:advanced sneaky(pussy) technology

Russia:brute mother fucking destroying technology

[mrjimbeam2009]

@RegretForNothing lol

[IceZeneo]

@RegretForNothing

haha! right XD

[Lespaduke]

@RegretForNothing

USA: Too much hi-tech. Fucking taxpayer

Russia: Old old old tecnology. Worldwide customers. )

[preemptivestrike20]

Greece: No technology. haha!

[sniperquasi]

@preemptivestrike20 hahaha, sometimes true

[MengeleMD88]

@preemptivestrike20

We ll start an a WW3  IF they come/.

[StrainXv]

@RegretForNothing yeah, but people killed in there sleep is a shit load scary then that gorilla you can hear a mile away trashing your neighbors house.

[bearsfan97]

@RegretForNothing sorry that the U.S. plays it smart

[Stefan11rus]

@RegretForNothing Сосите хуй америкососы! У русской армии больше силы в духе, чем в оружии! 

[Blazerx88x]

@RegretForNothing ¿?¿?¿

[olentattimies]

@RegretForNothing

pussy tech ? :l

so you are saying being wise = being pussy kk

[mustang1912]

of course it can

[90magor]

can tunguska shoot down jet plane or only helicopter??

[miljanFVU]

you saw the rockets first

[Karabas84]

@90magor yes, it has 10km range and 3.5km altitude range. it is the first line in anti air defense. It can shoot down missiles too. Second is s-300.

[90magor]

@Karabas84 wow !

[Excelentz]

@Karabas84 the second is Тор (Thor). After goes Куб (Kub). Next- Buk. And the last - S-300

[brocalfur]

@Excelentz Not really. You must distinguish between AD systems for ground forces and for the Air Defense. For the latter (ca. 2015/2020): 1. S-500 and the A-135 ABM 2. S-400 3. Vityaz and older S-300PM1/2 and others 4. Pantsir-S1 5. Morfei For the ground forces: 1. S-300V3/V4/VM 2. Buk-M1-2/M2/M3 3. Tor-M1/M2 4. something Strela-10-like 5: MANPADS igla-S and Verba That can be complemented with older stuff in storage.

[FireRunner905]

0:32

my life is complete :)

[alcapone796]

enemy (stactic) spotted

didn't copy enemy what

HOLY SHIT

[MrPau18]

i need uno de estos pa tirar el muro fronterizo

[zorigoo7]

wow

[romanmir01]

those helicopters will never take off.

---

какие глупые вертолеты, никогда им от земли не оторваться.

[garbageman80]

Looks like someone's spy plane wont be up for long

[Patriot7777777777777]

вещь



[TheSirjen]

Iran got more then 50 Tunguska. they buy it from russia

[fox454x]

lol look at the spinny disk!

[rocaho001]

@fox454x lol look at your face!

[nicola9532]

che favolose macchine da guerra.

[imolino87]

yes is good,but old

[GRFalkonas]

@imolino87 that thing was made to defeat the Apache....So, since western nations dont have anything better in their arsenal. It's not that old :-)

[Lewisit]

@GRFalkonas wait, they are out of use in the russian army, because they start to burn when firing their machin cannon, sure the western nations dont have anythin better in their arsenal ;)

[GRFalkonas]

@Lewisit I didn't know that, thanx for the info mate

[stevohouston]

I SCORE ME SOME AMERICAN PILOTS WITH THAT  HAHAHAHAHAAH

[QwukeStudioz]

so, vodka vodka, yes. vladmir putin is good, is he not? our nuclear arms are quite fancy, fancy. see? ТУНГУСКА!

[MEDBEDb125]

Эх нам бы такую штучку лет 65 назад, от люфтваффе отшибаться :)

[2323Nicko]

ЗНАЙ НАШИХ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[vlad9vt]

tunguska rulez

[3Sleipnir]

this tank is definitely not a piece of shit. It´s a typical russian warmachine.

Comparable to the german "gepard" antiaircrafttank. In my opinion this tank is better.

[PATRONSKiii]

@3Sleipnir gepard has no missiles, compared to gepard, the tungunska has speeder aquisition and firing with its cannon.

[3Sleipnir]

@PATRONSKiii yes you are right. The gepard is more comparable to the ZSU-23-4.

[stalliman]

@3Sleipnir hey the german army hasnt the gepard anymore. they are out of service.

[stalliman]

@PATRONSKiii hey the german army hasnt the gepard anymore. they are out of service.

[stalliman]

@3Sleipnir hey the german army hasnt the gepard anymore. they are out of service.

[gusano3310]

a la verga

[wladimirsr]

hay que meterles con todas estas armas a los putos yanquis de mierda..... muerte al imperio!!!

[ILoveFolkMusic]

i wish i had one of these to play with

[Incantro2]

holy crap look at that rate of fire

[MrExzyz]

I hate fucking russians but i cant say their weapons sucks.

[TheSamael1972]

@MrExzyz Уебись в очко-гнойное пидрило.

[SHEFF0023]

@TheSamael1972 Поддерживаю полностью.

[prominer83]

i wanna drive this to school

[Banzay35]

@prominer83 Не вопрос. Поступай в наше зенитно-ракетное училище))) Будешь кататься каждый день)))

[F22DarkRaptor]

Lol i imagine Tunguska vs AC130 Double kill; M-M-M-Monster kill

[jamesjamescamp3]

(a.k.a.) Steve Nash Catcher

[kos2084]

!!!!!

[westandalonetogether]

any aircraft's nightmare on battlefield 2

[TheSuspensio]

It to you not BMW

[TheSuspensio]

You do some flying on Apaches))))) And then when you will become a ghost you will tell.....

[Karel5656]

Nice piece of equipment right here. I would hate to be in an Apache against that machine.

[satelitakxy]

ale my musíme kupovat zbraně na západě...

[Holykid15]

@satelitakxy China will be the next Worl no 1 super power in economic and military in 2020. China will attack usa and destroy the fucking white colour nation. USA will be destroy and the EARTH WILL BE rule by our chinese. The great mongolian khan of china.

[DarkAngelusV]

Starscreams nightmare.

[bestamerica]

'

what is so WASTE arms weapons,,,

what use for and who country anti

[TheSuspensio]

@bestamerica You to do some flying on apaches))))) And then when you become a phantom will tell.....

[bestamerica]

TheSuspensio,

'

dont use a word  - YOU - on me,,,

use a word person

[CrzyHrse89CAV]

nice target for a HARM missle..cannon fodder.

[gimmespamnow]

@CrzyHrse89CAV The guns on that thing will indeed turn the HARM into cannon fodder. (That is part of the reason why they still have guns on AA units at all anymore.)

[vtkrey]

@CrzyHrse89CAV

TOR-M1...

[dodojardin]

do you hunt birds with these? lol

[TheIADepTI]

this made no vs jets ,

First vs heli

second vs Rockets such as tomahawk

And the last vs jets, the range of tunguska rockets only 6 km

[ihacksowhat]

A few depleted uranium rounds from an A-10 would reduce this clunker to bits of debris.

[Grofffy]

@ihacksowhat A-10 would never survived to to that in the first place.... :-))

[carlogwapo1234]

brilliant its look like s shower of armour perceing bullet

[cossackDmitro]

such a wonderful device)))

[WazzupGAMERZBloc]

a little odd to use that in these days, unless of course there's helicopters, no good VS a jet.

[Gegerys]

lol look the cartridges

[MrVitalik97]

норм пзрк, а я у пацана видио видел как в америке на учения пзрк adаption разлетелась при действии.

[Vykuk123]

Nice russian copy of Flakpanzer Gepard ,same concept (without offense) i really like that machine.I guess it will make from a A-10 swiss cheese.

[lemmy3001]

@Vykuk123 This is not a copy of Flakpanzer Gepard, this is logical extension of the russian Shilka-23-4 that were built at the end of 50's.

[StG45m]

@Vykuk123

you're mentally disabled, that's not a copy of anything. That is a genuine.

[MegaSerg123]

@Vykuk123 wtf are you talking about? Gepard and tungiska have different chassis, gepard dont have missiles and its guns are much better

[Dudeman9339]

good old anti aircraft standby. we have big guns... lets mount lots of them to a single turret! BRILLIANT!

[IvanTheDraggo]

Тунгуской надо марши несогласных и гей парады разгонять, хватит одного раза.

[interflug]

@IvanTheDraggo ЕДРАСТОВ РАЗГОНИ ДЛЯ НАЧАЛА !

[cd949604]

i like the spining radar

[maxwell775x]

monster killer!!!

[snuffying]

let's just say that you dont wanna be in any airplane when this monster shoots at you....

[NW0Zezima]

@snuffying I'd be in an airplane anyday against one of these. A modern fighter jet would pick one of these off easily and can easily avoid their lock on missiles. It's if you were a helicopter you would be screwed.

[seweryn22]

3:32 dope!!!!!

[EPMAK100]

Отличный ЗРПК

[SHEFF0023]

@EPMAK100 Заясни-ка мне что такое ЗРПК, а я тебе тогда заясню чо такое ЗСУ-2СБ комплекса "ТУНГУСКА"

[Falconfater]

I think it's machine gun can be used against infantry too

[uzmarvel]

Badass

[ronaldli5]

this vehicle is featured in Battlefield 2 game.its fucking ownage.

[Svittidiu]

Enemy AA vehicle spotterd.

[88Cortex]

@Svittidiu Haha!

[bengacris]

@Svittidiu Still dont understand why the HUD is so shitty in BF2

[bumermerc]

@Svittidiu lol Bf2 all the way

[Jacko643]

@bumermerc hahaha, i was thinking that when i clicked this video

[RussianAK47Sarge]

@Svittidiu

BF2?

[Svittidiu]

@RussianAK47Sarge Yes.

[Spetsnazas]

@Svittidiu "They opened Fire WE GOING DOWN *signal lost*"

[MyDogFlippy]

holy shit, so fast.

[marck0938]

Another obsolete tank!

[TheFluorineMartyr]

Do not get me wrong, I want one of those so badly. The intricacy and detail of design and concept, the incredible heights to which military technology has ascended is hard to grasp... it's just a bleeding shame we have them. War Vs. World poverty... I know where I'd put the cash.

[HeroDanny]

bigger and bigger weapons only kills more and more people...

i believe we should be inventing things that should help people... like medicine or machines that can help people... instead of always trying to blow people up....

[AllTweakendLong]

@HeroDanny As long as there's politicians there's always war. They don't have to fight in them so it's just a distant wave of their hands to them.