that last tip was a little bit misleading: yes, u want to sit to the left of an aggressive player, but typically a maniac-type player. u want to sit to the right of a tight player. a TAP can be tight or aggressive, and is capable of playing competently out of position. i guess my point is u should try to sit to their left, but it's not going to give u as big an edge as sitting to the left of an aggressive but much less skilled player.
Lmao... I can spare 10 bucks my full tilt poker username = alexatunes2845 =)
And yes
Full Tilt Poker just revealed to all the facebook fans that a new player can go to their web page, then sign up for a account using the code SPECIALS.
I think it's the preferred way if your a beginner to start off.. Your first deposit will be DOUBLED plus a couple other beneficial perks. It's only gonna work for the first 2000 players that register with this
tight aggressive player = that is the FIRST STEP beginners must be. these pros know how to play their cards that's why they can play even if loose. ex. Negreanu likes to play suited like 3 spade, 5 spade he will call it regardless of card ranking
Since when is tight-aggressive a winning style? So according to this retarded video, Phil Ivey, Daniel Negreanu, Tom Dwan, Patrik Antonius are all horrible losing players since they're very loose-aggressive players who play with any two cards.
Exactly. That's my point. You don't have to play tight-aggressive all the time to win. Based on how people play, you adapt to it. Phil Ivey is aggressive player but I've seen him play tight-passive when he was playing in poker invitational event where Gus Hansen was going crazy. In this situation, Ivey was playing tight-passive and let others eliminate each other. There's no such thing as winning style.
If I recall correctly that was a tournament style thing where your chips didnt follow you from table to table only your place/the points allotted did so it was slightly different though your point surely has merit.
Phil Ivey once said, you should never sit down with a strategy. So in other words, you play based on what kind of opponents you have at your table. If you got table filled with loose-aggressive morons, you play tight and build chips at once. If you got nitty tables filled with pussies, you play small ball and frequently raise where you take down the pots without a hand.
@EdDy4RheelZ All those player you mentioned have mastered the game... they can adapt to any play style, their reading abilities are excellent compared to the majority of poker players... They always bet for a reason and they bet the certain amount of money to either make you fold, make you re-raise with a dead hand or to value bet you, but I can assure you they started as Tight aggressive players and made their own style.
I understand that. But tight-aggressive isn't necessarily a winning style. Winning style is varied depending on who is sitting at your table. If you're in a table full of nits, then loose-aggressive small ball strategy is the best where you keep putting constant pressure on your opponents, constantly stealing blinds, constant c-bets, etc. If you're in a table full of gamblers, you play tight until you get good hands to accumulate chips and to control of the table.
It provided me with some great tips and i have actually been able to make some money now!
But still there is some good videos here on youtube, but i would give every new player the advice to visit that site I linked to, or bye a decent book.
loose is the only way to win a multi table tourney! trust me! but not too loose! steal blinds all day and don't get paranoid! when their is an opportunity to get big pots don't overbet because you're paranoid and feel like the pot is big enough already you'll regret it once the blinds raise in a few minutes. i just finished second in a 3,581 man tourney and i turned my 5 bucks on feb 10th to 121 bucks today
tight aggressive is not necessarily the best style. if you are an excellent player you win more money by playing slightly loose aggressive or even loose aggressive, which is far more difficult to play as tight aggressive. phil ivey, daniel negreanu, doyle brunson, etc. all play slightly loose aggressive.
that last tip was a little bit misleading: yes, u want to sit to the left of an aggressive player, but typically a maniac-type player. u want to sit to the right of a tight player. a TAP can be tight or aggressive, and is capable of playing competently out of position. i guess my point is u should try to sit to their left, but it's not going to give u as big an edge as sitting to the left of an aggressive but much less skilled player.
ketchup143 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@sasda5278
Lmao... I can spare 10 bucks my full tilt poker username = alexatunes2845 =)
And yes
Full Tilt Poker just revealed to all the facebook fans that a new player can go to their web page, then sign up for a account using the code SPECIALS.
I think it's the preferred way if your a beginner to start off.. Your first deposit will be DOUBLED plus a couple other beneficial perks. It's only gonna work for the first 2000 players that register with this
NegreanuDan33 1 year ago
RAKEBACKVILLAGE,COM
More money playing poker.
sienipata 1 year ago
tight aggressive player = that is the FIRST STEP beginners must be. these pros know how to play their cards that's why they can play even if loose. ex. Negreanu likes to play suited like 3 spade, 5 spade he will call it regardless of card ranking
watermage098 1 year ago
Online poker is rigged. Stay away kids.
JoeLBlack707 2 years ago 2
Since when is tight-aggressive a winning style? So according to this retarded video, Phil Ivey, Daniel Negreanu, Tom Dwan, Patrik Antonius are all horrible losing players since they're very loose-aggressive players who play with any two cards.
EdDy4RheelZ 2 years ago
I dont think you can really try and put those players into the average group/style as they all are capable of switching up their playstyles.
lostcause31 2 years ago
Exactly. That's my point. You don't have to play tight-aggressive all the time to win. Based on how people play, you adapt to it. Phil Ivey is aggressive player but I've seen him play tight-passive when he was playing in poker invitational event where Gus Hansen was going crazy. In this situation, Ivey was playing tight-passive and let others eliminate each other. There's no such thing as winning style.
EdDy4RheelZ 2 years ago
If I recall correctly that was a tournament style thing where your chips didnt follow you from table to table only your place/the points allotted did so it was slightly different though your point surely has merit.
lostcause31 2 years ago
I think It's called Solid-Aggressive style which is still a variant for Tight-Aggressive.
JOSBOY4LIF 2 years ago
Phil Ivey once said, you should never sit down with a strategy. So in other words, you play based on what kind of opponents you have at your table. If you got table filled with loose-aggressive morons, you play tight and build chips at once. If you got nitty tables filled with pussies, you play small ball and frequently raise where you take down the pots without a hand.
EdDy4RheelZ 2 years ago
@EdDy4RheelZ All those player you mentioned have mastered the game... they can adapt to any play style, their reading abilities are excellent compared to the majority of poker players... They always bet for a reason and they bet the certain amount of money to either make you fold, make you re-raise with a dead hand or to value bet you, but I can assure you they started as Tight aggressive players and made their own style.
Kovenmx 1 year ago
I understand that. But tight-aggressive isn't necessarily a winning style. Winning style is varied depending on who is sitting at your table. If you're in a table full of nits, then loose-aggressive small ball strategy is the best where you keep putting constant pressure on your opponents, constantly stealing blinds, constant c-bets, etc. If you're in a table full of gamblers, you play tight until you get good hands to accumulate chips and to control of the table.
EdDy4RheelZ 1 year ago
@EdDy4RheelZ
Good advice! There is no such thing as a "right" style. Table conditions should determine your play.
wisepopcorn 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey.
Great video!
I am a newbie and i found this site:
pkriseasy (DOT) blogspot (DOT) com
It provided me with some great tips and i have actually been able to make some money now!
But still there is some good videos here on youtube, but i would give every new player the advice to visit that site I linked to, or bye a decent book.
markandrews69 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Go to the No More Bad beats Online home page and change your luck !
titinho78 2 years ago
loose is the only way to win a multi table tourney! trust me! but not too loose! steal blinds all day and don't get paranoid! when their is an opportunity to get big pots don't overbet because you're paranoid and feel like the pot is big enough already you'll regret it once the blinds raise in a few minutes. i just finished second in a 3,581 man tourney and i turned my 5 bucks on feb 10th to 121 bucks today
djax4mvp 2 years ago
noob
4kingelle 2 years ago
LAG>TAG.
globalcapitalist 2 years ago 2
I disagree - doyle brunson is a tight aggressive player
Grouncontrol 3 years ago 2
she cant pronounce 'Vary'!!!
ravishedman 3 years ago
you want to sit to the right of TAG's. LAGs (loose aggro) you want to be on the left of. This will allow you isolate them preflop, in position obv.
Don't worry about the TAGs as much...
steveblah5 3 years ago
yes...very nice informative videos,,,
ChipChatPoker 3 years ago 2
Man..These videos are awesome!
somethingaboutpoker 3 years ago 2
great videos....!
ChipChatPoker 4 years ago 2
tight aggressive is not necessarily the best style. if you are an excellent player you win more money by playing slightly loose aggressive or even loose aggressive, which is far more difficult to play as tight aggressive. phil ivey, daniel negreanu, doyle brunson, etc. all play slightly loose aggressive.
mvogt 4 years ago