of course they would but our govt has turned the market against them. diesel cost more than gasoline courtesy of the 24.4 cent federal gas tax versus the 18.4 gasoline tax. then there is the chicken tax: 25% import tax fee on ALL light pick-up trucks coming into the country. now you know why several automakers came over here to build...well, had at least one reason to. lastly there is CAFE which mandates 35 mpg. taxes often have the effect of altering the consumer market.
it's not the EPA, it's the 24.4 cent tax on diesel. it's CAFE and it's 35 mpg fuel requirement, it's the "chicken tax" and it's 25% tax on all light pick up truck imports. the market is distorted. why would anyone buy a truck when the fuel is more expensive? it detracts from the better gas mileage. sucks to be us.
i dont understand why they don't offer the diesel in northern america because my understanding is that diesel burns cleaner and is easier to make so better emssions and thats what the whole word is about now
@sleepybone321 It's a conspiracy. Diesel was 60 cents less per gallon than unleaded for 7 decades, now it is 60 cents MORE than super unleaded. The enviro whackos infiltrated every part of government and HATE freedom! They saw that loggers, hunters, ranchers and others liked diesel pick up trucks. In the process they hammered the economy because everything is delivered in diesel trucks. In 1981 thru 1987 Isuzu (and Chevy) had 2.2 L diesel trucks from Japan I have one. obumo WANTS $9.oo diesel!
Definitely an incredible truck. I had a 01 Edge with the same lift as that, but nowhere near as capable. I would LOVE to see a deisel ranger come to North America
whoa they make a diesel ranger?!?!? i'd be happy with just gettin my 95 ranger off the ground a little bit lol. this thing looks like a fuckin beast with a jeep front end lol
@bazzamataz72 Last I checked it NEVER said it was "4wding" prick. Anyways, it looked like off road to me. Stop going around bitching about stupid stuff. Just watch the video YOU click on and if you don't like it then STFU and go to some other video.
Why would anybody buy a vehicle that is limited? Horrible marketing. How is it different than the regular Excursion? Is it's electronic top speed set at a lower speed than the regular Excursion or something??
i was really interested in hearing what a v6 3.0 diesel would sound like but all i got was some gay creed.ugh.i agree they would make a killing in the states off these trucks.nice ride though.
Amigo, muito bom o video. Se incomoda em tirar umas duvidas sobre o carro? Esses pneus sao 31" ou 33"? Ela ta com body lift ou eh efeito dos pneus mesmo? Sua capota eh de qual fabricante? A vedaçao eh boa? Cabe uma moto dentro? Eh facil de retirar? Achou muita diferença da suspensão da 2006 pra 2008? Ja teve problema com rolamento? Tenho uma Hilux 2007 AT e fui recomendado por alguns amigos jipeiros a vender a minha e pegar uma Ranger 3.0 pra uma viagem que quero fazer pela America do Sul.
@leandrogmf ,primeiramente obrigado. Vamos às perguntas: pneus 33 Wrangler MT/R aro 15 com Body Lift, senão raspa. Capota All Pickup, modificada para suportar barraca de teto. Vedação boa e não é muito tranquilo tirar não... Não cabe moto dentro pelo tamanho da caçamba, não pela capota. Não dirigi a com nova suspensão, portanto não sei se é melhor. A minha está modificada com amortecedores para competição e Air Lift na traseira...
@WichashaWanbli além disso sempre fui fã de Ranger desde a STX. Acho que pra equipar a Ranger fica mais bonita e funcional que a Hilux. O que seria esse air lift na traseira?
Tive uma Ranger 2003 e, em 2005 fui até o Perú com ela. Sem problemas de qualquer espécie, mas sabe o que ví muito por lá, principalmente no Chile e Argentina? Toyotas. Rangers, muito poucas e as que ví só na Argentina. Perú e Chile são forrados com Hilux. Acredito inclusive na facilidade de encontrar peças em alguma emergência. Gosto mais da Ranger também, mas a Hilux é uma excelente picape para essa viagem. Air Lift é um sistema de bolsas de ar que me permitem regular a altura da traseira.
To pensando em comprar uma 2006 e equipa-la. So me preocupo com a questao do rolamento que tanto falam. Desculpe a quantidade de perguntas, mas realmente iria me ajudar. Abraço
Já tive que trocar um rolamento dianteiro esquerdo. 89.000 km. Por que te aconselharam a trocar? A Hilux é uma excelente picape para esta viagem também!
@WichashaWanbli sabe como é esse pessoal fanático por trilhas. Já tive um Willys 81pra trilha mas vendi. Tentam me convencer que pickup boa e valente era a hilux antiga. Até concordo, mas na Hilux nova AT me sinto num Corolla alto! Bem melhor que a antiga. Aconselharam a Ranger pq ninguém botava a Hilux na lama. Minha viagem será muito asfalto, terra batida e rípio. Não vou fazer trilhas. Acho até que o conforto do cambio AT vai facilitar. Serão 30-40 dias de Brasil, Uruguai, Argentina e Chile.
I dream of a day when I don't need to look on the internet to see awesome diesel suvs and light duty pickups and can instead look at my driveway. The first company to bring their diesel in an suv or small pickup to the U.S. I will jump on it fuck brand loyalty. Land Rover Defender or the Lr4 toyota hilux. I've never been a ranger fan but crewcab oooo I like
I was just thinking ford should really offer the 4door Ranger to the U.S. market....I agree they could make a killing with it, especially since sales are down for the Ranger...it would compete with everything much more competitively...
I hate to say this about my own country but america has gone pussified (perfect example look at our president now) its all about "going green" after al gores lie about global warming, but of course 80% of people are stupid and believe anything they see on TV. all the new emissions regulations are bull shit and its hard to get my 87 f-150 passed now
@kdawg7070 You sir are an idiot. We are in a Global warming period. Learn the breakdown of all the atoms that come out of your exhaust pipe before you open it. the main problem is our over farming of cattle. one cow puts out as much as 3 cars. and i agree we are all pussies nowadays it's not because we care about our planet though.
@PirateXJ there is no global warming, its all a market scam so companies can sell the expensive eco friendly shit. i love my trucks dirty old exhaust and i love even more when toyota drivers choke on it
Ford would make a killing if they sold those here in america, but I guess they are too stupid to do it and the whole emissions thing is probly stopping them. I would definitely buy one if they had them here.
@jampagm , que é estranho é, mas isso está se tornando comum nesse vídeo...Muitos comentários sobre isso. O vídeo foi filmado em Piraquara, na região metropolitana de Curitiba.
@WichashaWanbli the real issue is because there has been "NO" emission testing done on these trucks for selling in the us so they can sit back and say that and expect no one would push the issue. the new tier of emission standards wants to reduce N0X and carbon if bio fuels are burnt in the same engine as for much of Europe these emission issues are mitigated
I think the problem is that US aren´t willing to pay the import costs and bring a Ranger from Argentina and sold there. It´d be more expensive and it´d need some improvements to make its way to US market. I´m sure the engine isn´t the problem (Diesel Rangers have great and clean engines), it´d need some extra features. Latin American market is less demanding on security and comfort features than US market.
@Coloradofan1910 they are going too. from what i hear anyway. and as far as euro goes.. the late 80's i think had a motor designed by europe. the one in my 86 is like that.
Indeed, European emissions are MUCH stricter than the US.
Ford knows if they want to continue selling Rangers, they're going to kill the F-150s sales, and why would they want that when the F-150 is the #1 selling truck in America?
@GreenRanger9096 Not sure why, but they would still sell a lot more rangers rather than how many colorados chevy sells which is not many at all. I guess thats why chevy is discontinuing it.
@Coloradofan1910 Same concept, Mini-trucks are slowly fading out, no one wants a truck that hauls less than an f150 and uses the same ammount of gas , if ford was smart they'd bring the diesal ranger over and tune it to push 35+ MPG and sell them like hotcakes.
@GreenRanger9096 With the diesel engine the ranger must have a decent amount of torque and a satisfying enough towing capacity. To be honest, the majority of people that buy big trucks never tow even close to half of the max capacity. A ranger with a diesel engine would be awesome and no more than what I need.
It's all about demographics, go to Ford Dealerships and ask them why they aren't selling Diesel Rangers here, they'll tell you the same thing I said before.
@Coloradofan1910 GM is putting their focus into the small truck market... there IS a reason why it is getting discontinued, something NEW is on the way.
@kemorc I hope it is something that is worth making. I still don't see why they didn't just stick the same V6 that is in the traverse into the colorado as a mid level engine instead of the inline 5s. It would give the truck more horses as well as a little more torque. I test drove a 2010 3.7 i5 crew cab z-71 and it felt like I had to put my foot to the floor to even move the truck. I hope they do a little more planning on their next entry in small-mid sized trucks
@Coloradofan1910 If GM goes with the 3.6 in their new truck, the other manufacturers are screwed. There is plenty of power and towing to be had with that engine, and with fuel economy to back it up.
@kemorc Both ford and chevy could wipe the rest of the market out if they just changed a couple of things on their trucks to get a leg up on the competition. Ford needs to do a little restyling for the ranger and offer a crew cab (maybe diesel to?). Chevy needs to get rid of its POS inline 5 engines, make the interior a little nicer, and maybe resize the truck so that 3 adults can actually fit in the back of the crew cab. Sounds like an overhaul, but it would most likely work.
@Coloradofan1910 According to pickuptrucksdotcom, GM is putting a lot of focus back into the small truck market. If they use the same engine in the camaro/crossovers, do a few electronic modifications if need be, they have a kick ass new engine for the market. Ford totally has that capability with the 3.7, but it seems like they could care less about the Ranger. Supposedly it might go into the F150, but there is STILL quite a few people that prefer the compact/small trucks. Some don't need full.
@kemorc That engine would be awesome if it goes in the colorado. As for ford they are missing out on the compact market, but as you said they don't really care. Why focus on something else when your full size market has the highest sales out of all the other companies. I for one hate driving a full size truck. I used to drive a 2500 silverado that my father had but it was way too big for what I do. I like fuel efficiency with capability not watching my money disappear at the pump.
@Coloradofan1910 GM is also debating on pulling the benched 4.5 duramax off the shelf and actually using it. It is all ready to go if they decide to. The question is, what do you stash it in? It puts out the same numbers as the original Duramax back in 01, but it is also cheaper and has a better fuel economy. If they put it in a half ton... i'd be all over it. They are supposedly debating using it in the 2500HD, and keeping the bigger duramax as a secondary diesel option.
@kemorc I would definitely settle for a half ton silvy if they put a small duramax in them. Although I will not drive a heavy duty again simply because of the size. Half tons are a little nicer because of the wider variety of features, but I would still prefer something awesome in the compact market. I sure wish that car companies would listen to their consumers.
@Coloradofan1910 Why wouldn't ford sell those ranger with diesel engines in the usa? is diesel too much more expensive than gas, or what? because if you are thinking that the problem are the emissions won't be, definitly, once diesel engine emis are less harmful than gasoline, you can look for. Thanks!
@Coloradofan1910 I agree. They would beat the chevy colorado and shit. This is suck an amazing truck. Ford would be even more rich if they sold it here. idk why they wouldnt they are american made any way
@Coloradofan1910 hell diesels were always and will forever be cleaner AND more powerful than gas engines, and we can do simple injector modifications and not have to worry about gas ever again and run them on corn oil, i want a 6bt for my 99' f150 but i dont have 6k for a new one. i like buying new, yes i know i can get a used one and it will still go easily another 600k miles i just like new.
@Coloradofan1910 They dont sell them because they say there isnt a large enough market. Not enough my ass. Cause a 3.0l v6 turbo diesel would get WAY better fuel economy then a 3.0l v6 gas engine. Fuck them, they need a Mini Powerstroke 3.5l or so!
@Coloradofan1910 they cant because that thing gets 40 MPG, how is the goverment gonna make any money off fuel if your truck gets that kinda mileage cheap basterds eh?
You wait may be over a FORD is testing the new Ranger here in Michigan! Based on the Australian Ranger (Mazda).... Hopefully it will have the option of the Diesel!
FUCK YOU N.A Ford i hope your company dies, i always owned Ford and LOVED EM. But cause of ur stupidity, i have to now buy a Japanese Tacoma instead of this Awesome Ranger only because its not available here.
I think you will start to see more and more diesels here in the USA! I know Mahindra is supposed to be adding compact diesel pick up that will achieve a est. 30 mpg on the highway.
@supersnot4 Yeah... the ranger was such a good truck that they have decided to stop producing it in 2011. Shoot, the Ranger hasn't been changed except in face lifts and a more potent engine or two for how many years? Well over a decade. The S10 was pretty dominant over the ranger... heck the ranger finally became a contender with the SOHC 4.0.
@kemorc yeah they never changed it for a reason. It's a good solid TRUCK, and look at its sales now. the S-10 was so good that they don't even make it anymore, right?
at least they still make the ranger. and no, it doesn't have to be powerful to be a better pickup truck. all that matters is that it's reliable and durable enough to be a truck. the only reason Ford is slowing production of the Ranger is because the F-150 is an insanely good seller for them, and will replace the ranger.
@supersnot4 Um, in order for it to tow and haul, it had to have a new engine designed for it. The ranger always has, and will be the truck that is way behind the times. Who is still going to be producing a small truck? By the looks of it, it won't be ford. The ONLY reason ford is "slowing" production is because no one wants the ranger, it is out-dated, and there are way better compact trucks on the market. Besides the cosmetic changes, the '10 ranger is damn near the same truck released in 01
@kemorc The ranger is still making good money for Ford through fleet sales. Ford has the chance to upgrade the ranger, but like I said, the eco-boost F-150 would just be a better candidate for it. Yes, I know the ranger is behind the times, but regardless of when they changed it, it's still a great durable truck, and I'd buy a new one no problem, if I just didn't need something a little bigger, which I do.
@originaldriver why would you EVER want a Syclone or Typhoon as a truck? they would never last as long as a ranger, especially under work conditions the Ranger was built for. the Ranger is a TRUCK. Those are just toys. and cheap ones at that.
@supersnot4 Hey... keep it relevent. You said that S-10 was some kind of embarrasment, yet I cant think of a single Ranger in existence that would bring the sort of resale that a Ty/Sy would.
Not bashing the ranger or anything, Im just saying.
@supersnot4 Oh... Its not just the limited number. Its the fact that it holds the quickest 0-60mph time of any production truck made in american history. (Although there are some faster production trucks in terms of top-end speed and 1/4 mile times ) Lightning, SRT-10, etc
Also, On what grounds do you shake your "hate-stick" at the S-10? Im curious to know.
So, from from what Im gathering from reasons 1-4, a fast shifting transmission and a torquey engine with good "car-like" drivablity is a..... "Bad thing"?
.
So If I want a good truck, then I should buy a torqueless, crappy driving, mushy-shifting truck ... like a Ranger???
@originaldriver I'm assuming you've never driven a Ford Ranger. It has plenty of torque to get the job done, which is exactly what a truck is for. A real truck isn't for showing off, the S-10 is, and therefor is not a real truck.
like I said in #2, it's not going to hold up to the abuse that a Ranger will.
and when you start worrying more about car-like driving, you start making sacrifices to the truck's structural integrity.
@supersnot4 I was really just poking fun at your rediculous reasons, but seriously.
I would beg to differ about the "abuse" tollerance of the ranger over the S-10. The Motorweek Comparison that I read actually awarded the S-10 with better overall build-quality and value. (Not to mention that anyone with a brain in thier head knows that the Ford 4.0l, and 3.0l v6 arent competition for the 4.3l chevy v6)
So Ill ask again, how is the S-10 "crap"? (Please come up with "real" reasons this time)
@originaldriver ahh, so you read an article about it did you? have you every actually owned or driven either one? probably not. I'm using facts straight from experience. about the only thing the S-10 has on the Ranger is the 4.3, and that's just because it has more power, which has nothing to do with durability. trust me, right no I own a '96 Jimmy. it's got power but everything is falling apart at only 96,000 miles.
'98 ranger 4-banger with around 400,000 and only needed a head gasket.
@supersnot4 I have never owned a ranger, but other than the standard problems had with Ford electronics in some models, Ive never really heard anything bad about them. Hence Ill say again, I dont have any thing against the truck.
.
On the same note, I HAVE owned an 01" S-10 extended cab with auto. I was impresed with the pickup and had to do nothing more than change a starter and TPS . The only real advantage that Ill give the ranger is its better 8.5in rear-end.
@blaserooo thats funny u must have different s-10's where u r from because where i come from they r complete junk...heck i have a 78 ranger with 452,000 miles and it still looks cherry
This particular model is available only in central and south america however the Australian, European, Asian and i believe the African markets get another 4 door ranger based on the Mazda bt25/Bravo chassis...2.5-3.0 turbo diesel or 2.5-2.9na...i have an 03 2.9 diesel here in jamaica
Diesel IS a dirty word in the states. It's asinine that people will spend huge bucks on an ugly, complicated Prius so they can get 43 mpg when a VW TDI can easily get 50+ mpg. Best of all, I read an article last week saying Toyota LOSES money on every Prius they sell. If every other piece of a vw wasn't over-engineered and unreliable, i'd buy one in a heartbeat.
I own a ranger and would love to drop in a small diesel and add one of the hydrogen fuel cell assist systems to get 40-45 mpgs.
Doesn't have to be a small diesel to get that kind of mileage. My neighbor has a 2004 Ram with the 5.9L Cummins and a 6 sp trans. He gets 35 mpg using a Diablosport tuner. The factories just don't tune diesels right to get the mileage out of them. I also know a guy that gets 42 out of a 6.6L Duramax. Diesel IS dirty word here, but crickcrackatack was right, it's just because people ASSUME a lot about diesels. I'm pro diesel, no matter who makes it, but my favorite is the Duramax.
Actually that 3.0 is a Benz diesel, although now that Fiat owns Chrysler they're building one to. According to some magazines I've read, we're supposed to be getting diesel Wranglers here in late 2010. It'll be nice to see somebody putting diesels in smaller diesels
de fato, a modinha picape/carro de passeio é até legal, mas picape tem que ser mais grosseira, claro que sem deixar de oferecer conforto, mas como disse:sua ranger tá d+
But you will find that UK and Europe will most likely keep the Ranger in production, same as Ford never never did the Expedition or the Excursion... $9 to $10 U$D a gallon you soon see why!
I would buy a 4 door ranger in a second if they freakin sold them in america. What gives? The Sport Tracs bed is way to small so isn't even an option.
Go to central America, but to be honest, paople who complain about 4 door rangers not being in american really need to look at Ford Explorer Sport Trac.'s. Same truck differnt name.
Actually you are quite wrong. The Sport Trac is based on the Explorer which is no longer based on the Ranger. The Sport Trac has independent rear suspension as opposed to a solid axle and it has lower ground clearance and the bed is quite small.
foda-se amarok
ENGCASSIANO00 2 months ago
Dear Ford, have you ever considered trying this in the USA? I would buy this in a heartbeat.
indyschmidt 5 months ago 2
@indyschmidt
of course they would but our govt has turned the market against them. diesel cost more than gasoline courtesy of the 24.4 cent federal gas tax versus the 18.4 gasoline tax. then there is the chicken tax: 25% import tax fee on ALL light pick-up trucks coming into the country. now you know why several automakers came over here to build...well, had at least one reason to. lastly there is CAFE which mandates 35 mpg. taxes often have the effect of altering the consumer market.
raufus3006 1 month ago
@indyschmidt
diesel is cheaper than gasoline in europe and the gas mileage is better.
raufus3006 1 month ago
@raufus3006 this is in brazil man and it not cheaper there than it is here. i lived there for two years.
1234tche 4 days ago
ô pneuzada boa, show
alecfc1 5 months ago
Não tem, reduziu na low, não tem o que não suba. Adoro a Ranger.
JaissonG 5 months ago
This is exactly why I hate the EPA. Drop our dumb standards and let us buy vehicles like these!
FordGuy100 6 months ago
@FordGuy100
it's not the EPA, it's the 24.4 cent tax on diesel. it's CAFE and it's 35 mpg fuel requirement, it's the "chicken tax" and it's 25% tax on all light pick up truck imports. the market is distorted. why would anyone buy a truck when the fuel is more expensive? it detracts from the better gas mileage. sucks to be us.
raufus3006 1 month ago
can it pull anything?
mi3pwns 6 months ago
fuck the faggy music off i want to hear the tone of the exhaust
bazzamataz72 6 months ago
What lift kit and gear is on that Diesel ranger?
madmarine2012 7 months ago in playlist trucks
Ive tryed these trucks in Ireland for 3 months they are awsome and they are actually built more for off road than our north american trucks.
acadien725 7 months ago
i dont understand why they don't offer the diesel in northern america because my understanding is that diesel burns cleaner and is easier to make so better emssions and thats what the whole word is about now
sleepybone321 9 months ago
@sleepybone321 It's a conspiracy. Diesel was 60 cents less per gallon than unleaded for 7 decades, now it is 60 cents MORE than super unleaded. The enviro whackos infiltrated every part of government and HATE freedom! They saw that loggers, hunters, ranchers and others liked diesel pick up trucks. In the process they hammered the economy because everything is delivered in diesel trucks. In 1981 thru 1987 Isuzu (and Chevy) had 2.2 L diesel trucks from Japan I have one. obumo WANTS $9.oo diesel!
3Mudbone1 9 months ago
@3Mudbone1 switch to biodiesel
serialcomplexity 6 months ago
@serialcomplexity Who has time for that? I work 70 hours per week. Biodiesel at the pump is more than regular diesel.
3Mudbone1 6 months ago
Definitely an incredible truck. I had a 01 Edge with the same lift as that, but nowhere near as capable. I would LOVE to see a deisel ranger come to North America
xr8d302 10 months ago
Not that great, about 26.0 mpg-US combined
MOEBIUSUIBEOM 10 months ago
@MOEBIUSUIBEOM thats pretty good as far as trucks go
mi3pwns 6 months ago
wat kind of mpg
rednck700 10 months ago
com esses pneu se sobe parede meu amigo haha ta linda a caminhoneta.
vodkawtf 10 months ago
real nice truck man wish they had these in the states 4 door 4x4 ranger with a diesel hell yea i would buy one
joe98stang 11 months ago
i love this truck
jorge25lovos 11 months ago
im impressed... keep it up!
wakeshooter 1 year ago
wtf? thats a ranger!!
metaljunkie209 1 year ago
whoa they make a diesel ranger?!?!? i'd be happy with just gettin my 95 ranger off the ground a little bit lol. this thing looks like a fuckin beast with a jeep front end lol
CmdrALF 1 year ago
OMG i want one they don't let us but those in the states that good for like my farm
redneck4runneroutlaw 1 year ago
Que musica mas mierda!
bombarderoazul 1 year ago
Is that south GA or south carolina?
Metallicaholic2009 1 year ago
this is not real 4wding its just driving through mud try some different terrain other that manufactured.
bazzamataz72 1 year ago
@bazzamataz72 Last I checked it NEVER said it was "4wding" prick. Anyways, it looked like off road to me. Stop going around bitching about stupid stuff. Just watch the video YOU click on and if you don't like it then STFU and go to some other video.
TheAmericanUhate 11 months ago
a crew cab 3.0 desiel ranger, perfect little truck for me
VanDub 1 year ago
Nadaa se compara aa uma Ranger , poode ter o qi foor as outras ,.
GalinhaFumante 1 year ago
@GalinhaFumante jajajaj tu ta locoo a melhor pick-up e a toyota
MegaTopRecords 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Why would anybody buy a vehicle that is limited? Horrible marketing. How is it different than the regular Excursion? Is it's electronic top speed set at a lower speed than the regular Excursion or something??
danwat1234 1 year ago
This music is awful.
MXicon 1 year ago
Hecho en Argentina
Josezitoreq 1 year ago
That thing is a beast man, ford all the way, chevy sucks balls and dodge sucks ass.
mondonut619 1 year ago
thats beasty
popopopopopo8 1 year ago
This is one of the nicest looking Rangers I've seen in a while...nice vid! It seemed very capable in the mud and off road in general. I'm loving it!
jordanmtoth 1 year ago
That is an awsome truck, i would kill to have one of them
BAMFANJAKE 1 year ago
i was really interested in hearing what a v6 3.0 diesel would sound like but all i got was some gay creed.ugh.i agree they would make a killing in the states off these trucks.nice ride though.
trentbrew24 1 year ago 41
@trentbrew24 , even without some "gay Creed", you wouldn´t listen a V6 3.0 L, because the 3.0 L diesel is a I-4 ...
WichashaWanbli 1 year ago 18
@WichashaWanbli
who cares it's a diesel fuck gas
Sauron767 11 months ago
@WichashaWanbli Creed rocks you faggot..
19ramcharger92 6 months ago
I agree that I would rather here the truck then the music . But dont be a basher. Grow up.
NorcoRules 1 year ago
@trentbrew24 dont talk shit about creed
Yum917 7 months ago
@Yum917 actually buddy creed licks some hairy balls,ur a fag for listening to that shit
trentbrew24 7 months ago
@trentbrew24 hahahahaahaha...truee man. nice
demonsinmysemon 6 months ago
why is this not available in the U.S., i would have bought this... oh well my 02 edge suits me jus fine
hlyshnt 1 year ago
very cool video....i have a 97 ford ranger tht i want to do somthing like to it
darkranger83 1 year ago
it fucking pisses me off that we can't get diesel rangers up here.
movitmovit 1 year ago
Amigo, muito bom o video. Se incomoda em tirar umas duvidas sobre o carro? Esses pneus sao 31" ou 33"? Ela ta com body lift ou eh efeito dos pneus mesmo? Sua capota eh de qual fabricante? A vedaçao eh boa? Cabe uma moto dentro? Eh facil de retirar? Achou muita diferença da suspensão da 2006 pra 2008? Ja teve problema com rolamento? Tenho uma Hilux 2007 AT e fui recomendado por alguns amigos jipeiros a vender a minha e pegar uma Ranger 3.0 pra uma viagem que quero fazer pela America do Sul.
leandrogmf 1 year ago
@leandrogmf ,primeiramente obrigado. Vamos às perguntas: pneus 33 Wrangler MT/R aro 15 com Body Lift, senão raspa. Capota All Pickup, modificada para suportar barraca de teto. Vedação boa e não é muito tranquilo tirar não... Não cabe moto dentro pelo tamanho da caçamba, não pela capota. Não dirigi a com nova suspensão, portanto não sei se é melhor. A minha está modificada com amortecedores para competição e Air Lift na traseira...
WichashaWanbli 1 year ago
@WichashaWanbli além disso sempre fui fã de Ranger desde a STX. Acho que pra equipar a Ranger fica mais bonita e funcional que a Hilux. O que seria esse air lift na traseira?
leandrogmf 1 year ago
Tive uma Ranger 2003 e, em 2005 fui até o Perú com ela. Sem problemas de qualquer espécie, mas sabe o que ví muito por lá, principalmente no Chile e Argentina? Toyotas. Rangers, muito poucas e as que ví só na Argentina. Perú e Chile são forrados com Hilux. Acredito inclusive na facilidade de encontrar peças em alguma emergência. Gosto mais da Ranger também, mas a Hilux é uma excelente picape para essa viagem. Air Lift é um sistema de bolsas de ar que me permitem regular a altura da traseira.
WichashaWanbli 1 year ago
To pensando em comprar uma 2006 e equipa-la. So me preocupo com a questao do rolamento que tanto falam. Desculpe a quantidade de perguntas, mas realmente iria me ajudar. Abraço
leandrogmf 1 year ago
Já tive que trocar um rolamento dianteiro esquerdo. 89.000 km. Por que te aconselharam a trocar? A Hilux é uma excelente picape para esta viagem também!
Abraço!
WichashaWanbli 1 year ago
@WichashaWanbli sabe como é esse pessoal fanático por trilhas. Já tive um Willys 81pra trilha mas vendi. Tentam me convencer que pickup boa e valente era a hilux antiga. Até concordo, mas na Hilux nova AT me sinto num Corolla alto! Bem melhor que a antiga. Aconselharam a Ranger pq ninguém botava a Hilux na lama. Minha viagem será muito asfalto, terra batida e rípio. Não vou fazer trilhas. Acho até que o conforto do cambio AT vai facilitar. Serão 30-40 dias de Brasil, Uruguai, Argentina e Chile.
leandrogmf 1 year ago
new ranger is coming out in 2012 hopefully like this!
bJoe314 1 year ago
ford will never sell these here FORD WAKE UP
I THINK THE RANGER WOULD BE COOL AGAIN
HELL THE 80"S ARE IN AGAIN HOW BOUT THE RANGER SEND IT OUT WITH A BANG
robbieo11 1 year ago
ranger e show!!!!!!!!!!!!
230198v 1 year ago
Built FORD TOUGH!
turbocharged258 1 year ago
Im selling 1 here in Guatemala any one intrested? $15,000 3.0 Diesel 2005 i bough it for $30,000 it has 90,000 Kms (56,250Miles)
LFLV89 1 year ago
WE NEED THAT TRUCK HERE!!!! I WOULD GET 1, HELL I WOULD 2!!! 1 for me and 1 for the wife!!!
rublesmodv6pony 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hãy gọi cho chúng tôi để sở hữu chiếc xe này ngay hôm nay
Công ty Ford AN ĐÔ - Đại lý uỷ quyền chính hãng của Ford Việt Nam
Địa chỉ: Toà nhà CT3 - Lô C1, Phạm Văn Đồng, Xuân Đỉnh, Từ Liêm, Hà Nội
Người liên hệ: Trần Vũ Hoàng(Mr) Mobile: 0983.667.123
tvhtn 1 year ago
I would buy one
nickm1993 1 year ago
I dream of a day when I don't need to look on the internet to see awesome diesel suvs and light duty pickups and can instead look at my driveway. The first company to bring their diesel in an suv or small pickup to the U.S. I will jump on it fuck brand loyalty. Land Rover Defender or the Lr4 toyota hilux. I've never been a ranger fan but crewcab oooo I like
GreenEyesRedBeams 1 year ago
i wonder if they beefed up the suspension and the gears to tow more since its a diesel
norulez1875 1 year ago
I was just thinking ford should really offer the 4door Ranger to the U.S. market....I agree they could make a killing with it, especially since sales are down for the Ranger...it would compete with everything much more competitively...
volvogod240 1 year ago
@volvogod240 We have a 4 Door 2010 Ranger Shortbed and i live in kansas?
snowymanpart 1 year ago
I would love to know if there is anyway to import one of these into America. I would love to have a Diesel Ranger!
GrandCaravanSE 1 year ago
I hate to say this about my own country but america has gone pussified (perfect example look at our president now) its all about "going green" after al gores lie about global warming, but of course 80% of people are stupid and believe anything they see on TV. all the new emissions regulations are bull shit and its hard to get my 87 f-150 passed now
kdawg7070 1 year ago
@kdawg7070 You sir are an idiot. We are in a Global warming period. Learn the breakdown of all the atoms that come out of your exhaust pipe before you open it. the main problem is our over farming of cattle. one cow puts out as much as 3 cars. and i agree we are all pussies nowadays it's not because we care about our planet though.
PirateXJ 1 year ago
@PirateXJ there is no global warming, its all a market scam so companies can sell the expensive eco friendly shit. i love my trucks dirty old exhaust and i love even more when toyota drivers choke on it
kdawg7070 1 year ago
sell that f***er in the US!!
FriendlyEagle 1 year ago
americans dont deserve
itsnikky 1 year ago
@itsnikky i like your simple minded comment, dumbass
CTJ420 1 year ago
Ford would make a killing if they sold those here in america, but I guess they are too stupid to do it and the whole emissions thing is probly stopping them. I would definitely buy one if they had them here.
Coloradofan1910 1 year ago 23
This engine is classified as Euro IV. There isn´t any diesel smoke... I think the emissions are not the problem with U.S Ford...
WichashaWanbli 1 year ago
well all i know is that i want one and sadly the US won't get them
Coloradofan1910 1 year ago
@WichashaWanbli Um americano preocupado com emissoes? estranho, nao?
Video ficou otimo, foi filmado em pg ou ctb ou onde? Percebi que eh do meu estado pela placa. Valeu!
jampagm 1 year ago
@jampagm , que é estranho é, mas isso está se tornando comum nesse vídeo...Muitos comentários sobre isso. O vídeo foi filmado em Piraquara, na região metropolitana de Curitiba.
Abraço!
WichashaWanbli 1 year ago
@WichashaWanbli the real issue is because there has been "NO" emission testing done on these trucks for selling in the us so they can sit back and say that and expect no one would push the issue. the new tier of emission standards wants to reduce N0X and carbon if bio fuels are burnt in the same engine as for much of Europe these emission issues are mitigated
ole409 1 year ago
What is the fuel mileage on this
interceptereater 1 year ago
Its about 9 km/L in urban use, and 11 km/l on roads.
WichashaWanbli 1 year ago
Its about 9 km/L in urban use, and 11 km/l in roads.
WichashaWanbli 1 year ago
@Coloradofan1910
I think the problem is that US aren´t willing to pay the import costs and bring a Ranger from Argentina and sold there. It´d be more expensive and it´d need some improvements to make its way to US market. I´m sure the engine isn´t the problem (Diesel Rangers have great and clean engines), it´d need some extra features. Latin American market is less demanding on security and comfort features than US market.
luisinhoens90 1 year ago
@Coloradofan1910 they are going too. from what i hear anyway. and as far as euro goes.. the late 80's i think had a motor designed by europe. the one in my 86 is like that.
halflife103 1 year ago
@halflife103 It would make a killing in America as long as ford doesn't over price them and the crew cab sure would be nice.
Coloradofan1910 1 year ago
@Coloradofan1910 yeah, i woudl buy one
halflife103 1 year ago
@Coloradofan1910
Indeed, European emissions are MUCH stricter than the US.
Ford knows if they want to continue selling Rangers, they're going to kill the F-150s sales, and why would they want that when the F-150 is the #1 selling truck in America?
GreenRanger9096 1 year ago
@GreenRanger9096 Not sure why, but they would still sell a lot more rangers rather than how many colorados chevy sells which is not many at all. I guess thats why chevy is discontinuing it.
Coloradofan1910 1 year ago
@Coloradofan1910 Same concept, Mini-trucks are slowly fading out, no one wants a truck that hauls less than an f150 and uses the same ammount of gas , if ford was smart they'd bring the diesal ranger over and tune it to push 35+ MPG and sell them like hotcakes.
GreenRanger9096 1 year ago
@GreenRanger9096 With the diesel engine the ranger must have a decent amount of torque and a satisfying enough towing capacity. To be honest, the majority of people that buy big trucks never tow even close to half of the max capacity. A ranger with a diesel engine would be awesome and no more than what I need.
Coloradofan1910 1 year ago
@Coloradofan1910
It's all about demographics, go to Ford Dealerships and ask them why they aren't selling Diesel Rangers here, they'll tell you the same thing I said before.
GreenRanger9096 1 year ago
@Coloradofan1910 GM is putting their focus into the small truck market... there IS a reason why it is getting discontinued, something NEW is on the way.
kemorc 1 year ago
@kemorc I hope it is something that is worth making. I still don't see why they didn't just stick the same V6 that is in the traverse into the colorado as a mid level engine instead of the inline 5s. It would give the truck more horses as well as a little more torque. I test drove a 2010 3.7 i5 crew cab z-71 and it felt like I had to put my foot to the floor to even move the truck. I hope they do a little more planning on their next entry in small-mid sized trucks
Coloradofan1910 1 year ago
I honestly don't know how the 3.7 i5 lives up to its 5,500 lbs towing capacity due to the way it performed just driving the truck itself
Coloradofan1910 1 year ago
@Coloradofan1910 If GM goes with the 3.6 in their new truck, the other manufacturers are screwed. There is plenty of power and towing to be had with that engine, and with fuel economy to back it up.
kemorc 1 year ago
@kemorc Both ford and chevy could wipe the rest of the market out if they just changed a couple of things on their trucks to get a leg up on the competition. Ford needs to do a little restyling for the ranger and offer a crew cab (maybe diesel to?). Chevy needs to get rid of its POS inline 5 engines, make the interior a little nicer, and maybe resize the truck so that 3 adults can actually fit in the back of the crew cab. Sounds like an overhaul, but it would most likely work.
Coloradofan1910 1 year ago
@Coloradofan1910 According to pickuptrucksdotcom, GM is putting a lot of focus back into the small truck market. If they use the same engine in the camaro/crossovers, do a few electronic modifications if need be, they have a kick ass new engine for the market. Ford totally has that capability with the 3.7, but it seems like they could care less about the Ranger. Supposedly it might go into the F150, but there is STILL quite a few people that prefer the compact/small trucks. Some don't need full.
kemorc 1 year ago
@kemorc That engine would be awesome if it goes in the colorado. As for ford they are missing out on the compact market, but as you said they don't really care. Why focus on something else when your full size market has the highest sales out of all the other companies. I for one hate driving a full size truck. I used to drive a 2500 silverado that my father had but it was way too big for what I do. I like fuel efficiency with capability not watching my money disappear at the pump.
Coloradofan1910 1 year ago
@Coloradofan1910 GM is also debating on pulling the benched 4.5 duramax off the shelf and actually using it. It is all ready to go if they decide to. The question is, what do you stash it in? It puts out the same numbers as the original Duramax back in 01, but it is also cheaper and has a better fuel economy. If they put it in a half ton... i'd be all over it. They are supposedly debating using it in the 2500HD, and keeping the bigger duramax as a secondary diesel option.
kemorc 1 year ago
@kemorc I would definitely settle for a half ton silvy if they put a small duramax in them. Although I will not drive a heavy duty again simply because of the size. Half tons are a little nicer because of the wider variety of features, but I would still prefer something awesome in the compact market. I sure wish that car companies would listen to their consumers.
Coloradofan1910 1 year ago
what if u buy one down there and have it shipped up here@Coloradofan1910
brandonmikes 1 year ago
@Coloradofan1910 Why wouldn't ford sell those ranger with diesel engines in the usa? is diesel too much more expensive than gas, or what? because if you are thinking that the problem are the emissions won't be, definitly, once diesel engine emis are less harmful than gasoline, you can look for. Thanks!
jampagm 1 year ago
@Coloradofan1910 I agree. They would beat the chevy colorado and shit. This is suck an amazing truck. Ford would be even more rich if they sold it here. idk why they wouldnt they are american made any way
JustRide626 1 year ago
@Coloradofan1910 hell diesels were always and will forever be cleaner AND more powerful than gas engines, and we can do simple injector modifications and not have to worry about gas ever again and run them on corn oil, i want a 6bt for my 99' f150 but i dont have 6k for a new one. i like buying new, yes i know i can get a used one and it will still go easily another 600k miles i just like new.
miketheredneckable 1 year ago
@Coloradofan1910 They dont sell them because they say there isnt a large enough market. Not enough my ass. Cause a 3.0l v6 turbo diesel would get WAY better fuel economy then a 3.0l v6 gas engine. Fuck them, they need a Mini Powerstroke 3.5l or so!
Motorfordtoyota 1 year ago
@Coloradofan1910 they cant because that thing gets 40 MPG, how is the goverment gonna make any money off fuel if your truck gets that kinda mileage cheap basterds eh?
yamaha4Llfe 1 year ago
@Coloradofan1910 I think that looks a little to muck like a Nissan Frontier. but cool none the less.
Fordfanforlife777 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Coloradofan1910 I think that looks a little to much like a Nissan Frontier. but cool none the less.
Fordfanforlife777 1 year ago
Comment removed
poikaa3 1 year ago
You wait may be over a FORD is testing the new Ranger here in Michigan! Based on the Australian Ranger (Mazda).... Hopefully it will have the option of the Diesel!
poikaa3 1 year ago
FUCK YOU N.A Ford i hope your company dies, i always owned Ford and LOVED EM. But cause of ur stupidity, i have to now buy a Japanese Tacoma instead of this Awesome Ranger only because its not available here.
BRING THIS TO CANADA !!!
chaosmage99 1 year ago
I WANT THAT TRUCK!
i don't see why ford doesn't sell a diesel crew cab ranger here.
All the other small trucks have a crew cad why not the ranger
wolfgangiceclaw 1 year ago 3
That's a good damn question. I'd trade in my F-150 in a heartbeat for a smaller truck like this one. Especially a diesel.
Stickman53fe 1 year ago
bring to canada
alexhatchard 1 year ago
Qual roda voce esta usando?? aro 15 ne ??
gabgdv 1 year ago
Isso! Aro 15X8, pneus 33' MT/R Goodyear.
WichashaWanbli 1 year ago
In Canada, if we want diesel engine on Ford pickup trucks, we have to buy a F250 or F350 Powerstroke.. No light diesel truck like this... I want one!
marchondaracing 1 year ago
Is this engine based on gasoline powered Ford 3.0L engine?
marchondaracing 1 year ago
No way. This is new engine made by MWM-International Engines, in Brazil. The Ranger is assembly in Argentina, but the engine is brazilian made.
WichashaWanbli 1 year ago
I think you will start to see more and more diesels here in the USA! I know Mahindra is supposed to be adding compact diesel pick up that will achieve a est. 30 mpg on the highway.
AsphaltCowboy57 1 year ago
i swear i will get a 4 door ranger here in to the united states, ill just take the cab truck bed and other suchs
GrotesqueFetus6 1 year ago
a full 4 door ranger? WTF?
stuntrider15 1 year ago
Nice video man awesome truck!! thanks for the comment on fords rule!
loserdog10 1 year ago
man i wish they made these in the USA
supersnot4 1 year ago
great truck! i wish they made the crew cab and diesel rangers here :(
anthonyledo 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the Ford Ranger is the wors car in the world I love de Chevrolet S-10 it is the best
blaserooo 1 year ago
Congratulations.... KKKK
WichashaWanbli 1 year ago
lol the S-10 is an embarrassment to the automotive industry. it might just be as bad as the Chrysler Sebring.
Ford all the way.
supersnot4 1 year ago 8
@supersnot4 Yeah... the ranger was such a good truck that they have decided to stop producing it in 2011. Shoot, the Ranger hasn't been changed except in face lifts and a more potent engine or two for how many years? Well over a decade. The S10 was pretty dominant over the ranger... heck the ranger finally became a contender with the SOHC 4.0.
kemorc 1 year ago
@kemorc yeah they never changed it for a reason. It's a good solid TRUCK, and look at its sales now. the S-10 was so good that they don't even make it anymore, right?
at least they still make the ranger. and no, it doesn't have to be powerful to be a better pickup truck. all that matters is that it's reliable and durable enough to be a truck. the only reason Ford is slowing production of the Ranger is because the F-150 is an insanely good seller for them, and will replace the ranger.
supersnot4 1 year ago
@supersnot4 Um, in order for it to tow and haul, it had to have a new engine designed for it. The ranger always has, and will be the truck that is way behind the times. Who is still going to be producing a small truck? By the looks of it, it won't be ford. The ONLY reason ford is "slowing" production is because no one wants the ranger, it is out-dated, and there are way better compact trucks on the market. Besides the cosmetic changes, the '10 ranger is damn near the same truck released in 01
kemorc 1 year ago
@kemorc The ranger is still making good money for Ford through fleet sales. Ford has the chance to upgrade the ranger, but like I said, the eco-boost F-150 would just be a better candidate for it. Yes, I know the ranger is behind the times, but regardless of when they changed it, it's still a great durable truck, and I'd buy a new one no problem, if I just didn't need something a little bigger, which I do.
supersnot4 1 year ago
@supersnot4 So I guess that goes for the Syclone and Typhoon as well, huh? Go suck it.
originaldriver 1 year ago
@originaldriver why would you EVER want a Syclone or Typhoon as a truck? they would never last as long as a ranger, especially under work conditions the Ranger was built for. the Ranger is a TRUCK. Those are just toys. and cheap ones at that.
supersnot4 1 year ago
@supersnot4 Hey... keep it relevent. You said that S-10 was some kind of embarrasment, yet I cant think of a single Ranger in existence that would bring the sort of resale that a Ty/Sy would.
Not bashing the ranger or anything, Im just saying.
originaldriver 1 year ago
@originaldriver of course a Ty/Sy would bring great resale. they only made like 5,000 of them combined. They're still not a good truck.
supersnot4 1 year ago
@supersnot4 Oh... Its not just the limited number. Its the fact that it holds the quickest 0-60mph time of any production truck made in american history. (Although there are some faster production trucks in terms of top-end speed and 1/4 mile times ) Lightning, SRT-10, etc
Also, On what grounds do you shake your "hate-stick" at the S-10? Im curious to know.
originaldriver 1 year ago
@originaldriver well of course it has the quickest 0-60 time. it's a small truck, so it accelerates faster.
ground #1, It's a Chevy.
#2, S-10s don't hold up to the abuse that a truck should (I should know).
#3, just about every S-10 I see is lowered ridiculously, making for a useless truck.
#4, S-10 is designed more for the street, and sits and drives like a car.
#4, transmission is ridiculous, and most will chirp into 2nd gear.
# -1 I do like the 4.3, it's a torquey big V-6, but still GM.
supersnot4 1 year ago
@supersnot4
So, from from what Im gathering from reasons 1-4, a fast shifting transmission and a torquey engine with good "car-like" drivablity is a..... "Bad thing"?
.
So If I want a good truck, then I should buy a torqueless, crappy driving, mushy-shifting truck ... like a Ranger???
.
(I hope that I didnt get that wrong...)
originaldriver 1 year ago
@originaldriver I'm assuming you've never driven a Ford Ranger. It has plenty of torque to get the job done, which is exactly what a truck is for. A real truck isn't for showing off, the S-10 is, and therefor is not a real truck.
like I said in #2, it's not going to hold up to the abuse that a Ranger will.
and when you start worrying more about car-like driving, you start making sacrifices to the truck's structural integrity.
supersnot4 1 year ago
@supersnot4 I was really just poking fun at your rediculous reasons, but seriously.
I would beg to differ about the "abuse" tollerance of the ranger over the S-10. The Motorweek Comparison that I read actually awarded the S-10 with better overall build-quality and value. (Not to mention that anyone with a brain in thier head knows that the Ford 4.0l, and 3.0l v6 arent competition for the 4.3l chevy v6)
So Ill ask again, how is the S-10 "crap"? (Please come up with "real" reasons this time)
originaldriver 1 year ago
@originaldriver ahh, so you read an article about it did you? have you every actually owned or driven either one? probably not. I'm using facts straight from experience. about the only thing the S-10 has on the Ranger is the 4.3, and that's just because it has more power, which has nothing to do with durability. trust me, right no I own a '96 Jimmy. it's got power but everything is falling apart at only 96,000 miles.
'98 ranger 4-banger with around 400,000 and only needed a head gasket.
supersnot4 1 year ago
@supersnot4 I have never owned a ranger, but other than the standard problems had with Ford electronics in some models, Ive never really heard anything bad about them. Hence Ill say again, I dont have any thing against the truck.
.
On the same note, I HAVE owned an 01" S-10 extended cab with auto. I was impresed with the pickup and had to do nothing more than change a starter and TPS . The only real advantage that Ill give the ranger is its better 8.5in rear-end.
.
Thats it.
originaldriver 1 year ago
@originaldriver well like i said, i've owned both. yes they're both nice, but the S-10 just isn't as much of a truck as the ranger.
supersnot4 1 year ago
@blaserooo thats funny u must have different s-10's where u r from because where i come from they r complete junk...heck i have a 78 ranger with 452,000 miles and it still looks cherry
77bajaf150 1 year ago
they need to bring these models to the US
951prerunner 2 years ago
i want it
skidoomxz550 2 years ago
where did you get your four door ranger from
mlcracing1 2 years ago
4 door rangers are only available overseas. Most likely this is a Mexican or South American truck.
goattke 2 years ago
it's a Brazilian Ranger
lemos80 2 years ago
figured it was something it was a central or south american truck, since that's about the only place they're available
goattke 2 years ago
This particular model is available only in central and south america however the Australian, European, Asian and i believe the African markets get another 4 door ranger based on the Mazda bt25/Bravo chassis...2.5-3.0 turbo diesel or 2.5-2.9na...i have an 03 2.9 diesel here in jamaica
flenny 1 year ago
what are the chances of buying one in mexico and bring it the US do you?
stang46281 1 year ago
@mlcracing1....you can't get one they are only available in south america
cumminsandcopenhagen 2 years ago
this is probly a mexico based model
951prerunner 2 years ago
Diesel IS a dirty word in the states. It's asinine that people will spend huge bucks on an ugly, complicated Prius so they can get 43 mpg when a VW TDI can easily get 50+ mpg. Best of all, I read an article last week saying Toyota LOSES money on every Prius they sell. If every other piece of a vw wasn't over-engineered and unreliable, i'd buy one in a heartbeat.
I own a ranger and would love to drop in a small diesel and add one of the hydrogen fuel cell assist systems to get 40-45 mpgs.
MrKalebr 2 years ago
Doesn't have to be a small diesel to get that kind of mileage. My neighbor has a 2004 Ram with the 5.9L Cummins and a 6 sp trans. He gets 35 mpg using a Diablosport tuner. The factories just don't tune diesels right to get the mileage out of them. I also know a guy that gets 42 out of a 6.6L Duramax. Diesel IS dirty word here, but crickcrackatack was right, it's just because people ASSUME a lot about diesels. I'm pro diesel, no matter who makes it, but my favorite is the Duramax.
goattke 2 years ago
@MrKalebr....cummins makes a 3.0 engin here in the states
cumminsandcopenhagen 2 years ago
Actually that 3.0 is a Benz diesel, although now that Fiat owns Chrysler they're building one to. According to some magazines I've read, we're supposed to be getting diesel Wranglers here in late 2010. It'll be nice to see somebody putting diesels in smaller diesels
goattke 1 year ago
your truck is very good, and with a creed`s song, just make`s a perfect match.
TheMarcosgoulart97 2 years ago
Obrigado Marcos!!! Os americanos invadiram aqui! Ficam loucos porque não tem Cabine Dupla e Diesel! Me divirto com eles!!!
Abraço!
WichashaWanbli 2 years ago
de fato, a modinha picape/carro de passeio é até legal, mas picape tem que ser mais grosseira, claro que sem deixar de oferecer conforto, mas como disse:sua ranger tá d+
valew
TheMarcosgoulart97 2 years ago
ENDING PRODUCTION....Maybe in the USA...
But you will find that UK and Europe will most likely keep the Ranger in production, same as Ford never never did the Expedition or the Excursion... $9 to $10 U$D a gallon you soon see why!
jeep4jeep 2 years ago
lol this is the superduty of 3rd world countries
pieman980 2 years ago
lol
eddimull 2 years ago
I would buy a 4 door ranger in a second if they freakin sold them in america. What gives? The Sport Tracs bed is way to small so isn't even an option.
Dereks06 2 years ago
What lift-wheel combo do you have on this truck? like size wise
carsony124 2 years ago
It's a 3" Body Lift and 15"X8" wheels, with Goodyears MT/R 33"X12.5"
WichashaWanbli 2 years ago
wtf? i cant find a four door anywhere...
mrwashur1991 2 years ago
Go to central America, but to be honest, paople who complain about 4 door rangers not being in american really need to look at Ford Explorer Sport Trac.'s. Same truck differnt name.
crickcrackatack 2 years ago
Actually you are quite wrong. The Sport Trac is based on the Explorer which is no longer based on the Ranger. The Sport Trac has independent rear suspension as opposed to a solid axle and it has lower ground clearance and the bed is quite small.
rcmaster1029 2 years ago