[Eng Subs] A look at the PLA Type 95 and 5.8mm round. 3/3

[souro19]

INDIA ALSO UNDER DEVELOPING A MULTI CALIBRE BULLPUP GUN !

IT'S FOR F-INSAS PROJECT !

[Auroranwarlock197]

The PLA just got scarier....

[ChiefRapeTrain]

6.8mm SPC> 5.8mm

[211Alucard]

I guess Americans don't like History.The Chinese invented the gun.The world copy the Chinese not the other way around.American guns/weapons are just like the Chinese and other countries but just cost more.

[mz74smart]

1:35, that is an ak47, you can tell by the magazine

[tjia1452]

@Goodspittin QBZ-95 is a combination of the accurate M16 and the reliable AK

[tjia1452]

@MrFacebuster None of the nation got this weapon yet

[Goodspittin]

I believe he was mistaken, that WAS an AK47. Easy mistake, especially when you're following a TV script. Good segment otherwise.

[Squid165]

Chinese firearms are mass produced shit that only serve the purpose of firing a massive amount of cheap bullets. There a ton of cost cuts taken when making the type95 and the 5.8.

[csmybuttt]

@Squid165 How do you know this? Do you have a racially unbiased, verifiable reply, or are you talking out of your ass?

[ervin920]

@Squid165 than those bullets will break in your ass.

[Goodspittin]

@Squid165 Ah, that's why the Type-56 is so popular around the world. I thought it was because China puts a lot of emphasis on assuring its military hardware is durable and affordable.

[MrFacebuster]

strange.............in MW3 none of the factions uses this it looks more suitable for Spetsnaz or PMC

[Paulmarti]

Made in China? I wouldn't trust my life to it. I'll stick with my Bushmaster; hasn't failed me yet.

[1JesseW]

@Paulmarti The Type 56 was the most widely used rifle in Vietnam by the NVA and the Viet Cong. Guess what? It's made in China, and according to many American vets, you can depend on it a lot more than the M16A1.

[Paulmarti]

@1JesseW The AK design is inherently more reliable than most other platforms, despite country of origin. Afterall, the AK design was made to be cheaply produced. Have you tried any other Chinese firearms? Chinese Tokarev... shit. Chinese AR-15... shit. Chinese shotguns... shit. By the way, the M16 has come a long way since 'Nam. There's a reason why we've used it for so long, and there's a reason countries that can afford to will use anything other than an AK.

[1JesseW]

@Paulmarti It is obvious clone weapons made by China are shit because they are cheap copies of much more expensive designs (except for the Tokarev). You obviously get what you pay for. This rifle; however, is for Chinese military use and will probably be of much better quality than weapons designated for export.

[Termiteruler]

I want one, but Clinton made it so that Chinese weapons can't be imported, and the Canadians nixed their shipments. :(

[Schultz98]

I like this video, but its true that it is indeed propaganda. The gun he made sure to "assure you its not an ak47, its an ak74" was indeed a 7.62 AKM rifle, I mean the lie is kind of small and Id let it go because the AKM and ak74 have similar weights and size though the flash hider on the 74 makes it a little longer. But I mean every country will boast its own weapons, we in the US do, the Russians do the Germans do. So I can't blame china for doing the same, either way its a cool looking gun

[GunsOfThePhoenix]

It should also be noted that there is an export version of this rifle that comes in 5.56 NATO, the QBZ-97.

[annlikescats]

i saw a screenie from bf2 here

[jwang9989]

I know that the chinese are usually full of crap and propaganda but I think a lot of what they're saying makes sense. I mean they're comparing it with rifles that are decades old so its bound to be a bit more modern and updated and there are tons of complaints from americans that the 5.56 is too small and under performs in the field. I'm sure if America decided to make a real effort to overhaul their old weapon system for a new one we could make a much better rifle.

[Gloomshadow1]

@jwang9989 The Chinks are good with weapons and have been for thousands of years..the new bullpup they make is very good. One thing they are not telling you though is that bullpups are hard score hits with at 300M, they dont have any forward weight to stablize your sight picture, and they suck for left handed shooters. The US has kept the M-16 for a long time bc the troops love it and trust it. The M-16 is alot more "rifle-like" in your hands than a bullpup is, Id rather have the 16 or the M4

[Riyun72]

Lol just another chinese "we are better than the world " bullshit propoganda video.

[AAV47]

@Riyun72 I'd say it's a half truth here. The QBZ is reliable, but the testing looks bogus. Btw, every country has "we are better than the world" videos. Propaganda is everyday life. Get over it.

[fludblud]

@Riyun72 and shows like futureweapons aernt?

[WillyChoi87]

@fludblud Shows like Future weapons only cares about developement on nato countries, american public cares about national safety, why concern about future Kalashnikov or Future QBZ lol.

[WillyChoi87]

@Riyun72 So is America Bitch, and any other people who loves their country. China has propaganda and we have Commercials or Hollywood that does the same job.

[Kano169]

@Riyun72 Elaborate (=

[OkinovaF15]

the first bullpup was enfield em 2. the first bullpup that was in service by an army was aug. why do everyone say that this rifle is a copy of famas when the famas came later then the enfield em2 and aug. if the qbz was copy of something it would be enfield not famas but qbz is not a copy sure it use the bullpup layout but because of that is not a copy.

[111E982a]

@OkinovaF15 nope, the first bullpup is unknown. but one of the earliest is the Thorneycroft carbine, bolt action. but also by bristiahs and use the .303

QBZ is a mix, just like all modern guns.^^

[OkinovaF15]

@111E982a LOL i know that for a couple a weeks ago actually (not the part the first bullpup is unknown) but anyway thx to clarify that :P

[111E982a]

@OkinovaF15 hahas, yea, just an old habit to make things as accurate as possible..^^

[111E982a]

@OkinovaF15 btw, the carbine was invented in 1901..lols

[SLVRFOX88]

Ill take the sniper version and some ammo please.

[Hairysteed]

Why is it that every time someone sees a bullpup rifle they immediately say it's a copy of AUG/FAMAS/(insert bullpup rifle here) although on the inside the machinery might be totally different?!

I bet even when they see a DIO Bullpup conversion of H&K G3 they say it's a copy of FAMAS, even though it's a G3!

[alongthebluff]

@Hairysteed From the artistic point of view, their latest 5.56mm bullpup is pretty handsome.

[Hairysteed]

@alongthebluff form follows function. I don't like the position of the selector switch

[alongthebluff]

@Hairysteed

The improved version already rearranged the fire selector switch above the pistol grip.

[Hairysteed]

@alongthebluff You mean the Khaibar or the QBZ-95

[alongthebluff]

@Hairysteed The QBZ95. Anyway i think the latest Khaibar got similar rearrangement as well.

[alongthebluff]

@Hairysteed Wait! Are you talking about the QBZ-95 or the latest Iranian bullpup assault rifle?

[Hairysteed]

@alongthebluff The QBZ-95, but IIRC the Khaibar also had a selector switch in the buttstock (AR-machinery). Didn't know if these were remedied in later models. I don't like how the Khaibar doesn't have a foregrip or a handguard for the non-operating hand, whereas the QBZ-95 has a nice blended handguard/small foregrip

[kightremin]

@Ferior so, in your opinion, all the automatic rifles are copy from Sturmgewehr44?

[kightremin]

@Ferior so, in your opinion, all the automatic rifles are copy from Sturmgewehr44?

[boudi001]

Famas copy.

[Hairysteed]

@boudi001 not all bullpup rifles are Famas copies

[cheetok1ng470]

@boudi001 oh year, they do have similarities, they both have a trigger and a mag behind it! The Chinese are SOOOO cheap they're guns shouldn't fire bullets cause then they would be copying other guns made by other countries!

[Buuub08]

@cheetok1ng470 The Chinese "cheapness" is artificially maintained.

Their guns are actually quite alright, cant really think of any negative aspects.

They havent really been "copying" as much as they have been making these things under an acquired license.

Also reverse engineering happens here and there, but its rarely rebuilt directly due to being localized and fit for local needs and conditions. Design influences happen a lot all over the world, its a common thing.

[esh325]

@Ferior, seeing how Kalashnikov didn't create the 7.62x39, I don't know why you would list it. You are right about the stampings.They most likely did get the idea of stamping the rifle from the MP44 as most infantry rifles before that were all machined. More AK-47's were machined rather then stamped though. Your third point is null in regards to how the AK-47 is nothing but a simplified STG44.

[esh325]

@Ferior, minor changes like what? You didn't list them because you don't know what they are.

[JinBleach]

Don't say that the QBZ 95 is a copy of FAMAS just becuz its a bullpop and they look similar, if u ever used them both u will know. The inside is differently constructed. QBZ 95 is much better than the FAMAS in durability, accuracy, and penetration. So don't go comparing them both, they are very different.

[aussieblackhawk123]

Man the M-16 they have is like soo old

[georgewashington92]

a fucking copy of the famas

[speedorpower]

famas a fucking copy stery aug and M-16

[jobjed]

the famas is shit. it waste so many bullets by having such an unneccesary high rate of fire. its also has shit range 400m.

[SpoutnikMKV]

@jobjed Lol and ? Soldiers very rarely shoot full auto anyway, the FAMAS can also to fire 3 round burst with it's 19.1 inch barrel it's pretty darn accurate. Yes the design is getting a little old and it is heavier than new generation rifles but it's far from shit.

[ned262626]

this woman is sexy, especially her hair and the grunts she makes while the men talk

[esh325]

The same grunts and moans she makes in bed, haha.

[blackhawk868]

Hehe, BF2 photos. But at least it gets the job done.

[Taz418]

I just noticed that at the bottom of the M4 and M16 photos. Wow, this reminds me of the Bejing Olympics mascot ^_^

[fredgt28]

Wow, what an excellent gun!

[MikeLenoch5]

I can't believe a legitimate news source used Battlefield 2 images. If I'm not mistaken DICE/EA are justified to file a lawsuit.

[fludblud]

intellectual property laws in china are either very limited or non existant. not to mention CCTV are state owned so any lawsuit attempt will be futile

[cuaem]

LOL they used bf2 pix

[bunnyrabbit008]

The 5.8mm comes in steel case and jacket right? just like the Russian 5.45x39mm and the 7.62mm x 39mm ? Any body please ?

[ericst2003]

cuz China lacks copper, so they had put money and time to develop steel case rounds. as far as i know, only pistol rounds use copper in the Chinses military

[saledin1]

They use M16 pictures in Battlefield 2 game.....

[NebPWN]

the fucking news anchor is the noob, doesnt know wut the fuck she is talking abt

[phildaguy]

Type-95 carbine can be concealed under the users outer coat. I wouldn't be surprise if Chinese secret service agents carried it.

[classicleon]

枪短了之后在肉搏战里头不占优势。

[classicleon]

多谢楼主的字幕

狙击应该是snipe

狙击步枪叫sniper rifle, 不过好在sharp shooter能被人看懂,就是稍微有点中式英语。

还有好多翻译中的小问题，有空的时候改改吧。加油~

[Uberaoshi]

is that a M16 American or Filipino or korean one not Norinco bootleg M16

I swear that was not a Ak74 it clearly had a 47's metal magazine

[terryzz24]

it's AK74 Chinese version for sure

[wuyunchi]

That's right

[unbiasedperson]

holy crap a bf2 screenshot as a picture for the m16. this video has everything.

[StoneSlinger0oo0]

All modern assault rifles have their merits, however, it is the skill of the person who wields the rifle that remains the deciding factor in the effectiveness of the weapon system.

[kullwarrior]

seriously you said so much good stuff but you fail to prove it. lol (I was listening to it rather than readign sub title since I can understand chinese)

[dograven1]

this is an AUG Carbine, this is the carbine version version.....wtf?

[GusCraigengower]

Well first he's saying it's an AUG Carbine, and then he explained it's the carbine version and so has a shorter barrel than standard AUGs. He just repeated what he said, nothing don't get confused.

[kightremin]

@dograven1 rough translation

[educate9946]

LOL, at 1:06 they use an image from Battlefield2.

[dograven1]

lol nice

[esh325]

also thanks to the author who used subtitles.

[esh325]

Also they seem to digging on this rifle too much saying it's the best thing in the world when all weapons have design trade offs. What about the fact that bullpups have difficulty being shot by left handed users?

[esh325]

Why does he say it's not an AK47? It has a distinctive curve on the magazine that both AKM and AK47 have it also has a slant compensator that the AKM has.

[GusCraigengower]

Well cuz it's the AK74. All three looks very alike, but AK74 is the most advanced out of the three cuz it's refined from the AKM and the AKM is in turn refined from the AK47.

The most obvious difference would be the AK74 is much longer than the AK47 and the AK74 has a bigger muzzle flash-hider than the 47.

[esh325]

It's not a AK-74M though in the video.

[NebPWN]

it is, just an older version with wooden buttstock

[esh325]

What is?

[Hairysteed]

@GusCraigengower Muzzle compensators are also available for AK-47/AKM. The distinctive feature to look for would be the magazine; 5.45mm magazines are less curved due to the shape of the shell casings of the 5.45mm round. That magazine is clearly for 7.62x39mm

[Bladed0edge0razor]

mmmm...why does the guy say soviet union instead of Russia?!

[dahvisibleinvisible]

cus the rifle was made in the soviet union and not in Russia perhaps?

[kightremin]

@Bladed0edge0razor translation prob

[vilunika]

AUG The modelling is very attractive

[Beliserius1]

i think the M4 is just as good.

Anyways... small firearms don't quite have much differences when compared to each other when fielded. its mostly dependant on skill of the user.

[hetzerluo]

Pros about 95: covered in above videos.

Cons: 1. No bolt-hold-opn  2. For a field strip the optics MUST be detached first...

[shadowzerothree]

Could you specify more? i could be wrong...

I thought the bolt can hold. Check the other test firing videos on youtube.

The scope is attached to the carrying handle, and if you look at the dissembling picture, the top receiver and the carrying handle is one piece. Cannot see why the scope has to be removed?

[hetzerluo]

The export 5.56/.223 version, Type 97, has the bolt hold open. But the Type 95 has not. The reason? I don't want to say...you could google: "弹匣强度"+"挂机"

[hetzerluo]

The scope is not attached to the handle, but to the cantilevered scope mount, which is a one-piece with the rear iron sight, directly connected on the barrel. The carrying handle is a one-piece with the upper hand guard, and the cantilevered mount is shielded by the handle. So to field strip a 95/97, you have to remove the scope, which is true even for the Type 88 sniper rifle. You could google "95式"+"分解" to see.

[xXLoneWolfXv]

Russian military uses AK103 now but i think the recoil is worse cause of the test fires or youtube it jerks back alot and for rapid-fire it has to be carried like a tommy gun, but still a great modern gun.

[esh325]

The AK-103 is not their standard rifle it's the AK-74M.

[picure]

Also, AK series forever.

[picure]

AKM not AK74

[Bluecdtvhp]

Ha! apparently the AUG is "odd looking." What the hell? Where does he get off saying that? Of the 3 weapons he was comparing the type 95 to, the AUG physically looks the most similar. What a tool.

[leaveourwhalesalone]

it does look weird at first. i remember when i first saw steyr aug i thought it looked weird too. alienish. it's australia's standard weapon of choice now.

[ldynasty]

IMO, he called it "odd looking" because the aug isn't as recognized to the chinese public as the m16 or the ak series.

[Bladed0edge0razor]

Your right. The guy is a bit foolish...that rifle wasn't AK-74 but was AKM!

[GusCraigengower]

Oh yeah, the muzzle looks AKMish, cuz there isn't the thick long flash suppressor on the muzzle that 74s have.

But the pictures shown were really 74s, the 1st one shown is AKS-74U, and the second one is an AK74M.

[AmericanDreamer1]

Yeah, I still don't get it:

Why do you need a "new rifle" to oppress Human Rights in Tibet & inside China itself???

.

[shadowzerothree]

Because we don't oppress HR in Tibet and inside China. We need a new rifle to defend our selves against possible racists like you.

[StephenETavington]

Who is the engineering referring to at 3:34 who sees children playing blocks?

Was it Eugene Stoner (or is it not???)

[Belva1]

no way the ak he held was an ak74... it was indeed an AKM... propaganda ...

[blah979]

thanks for subs :)

[Excalibur01]

and how is the SAR-21's recoil supposed to be a bad thing? If any, a lower recoil is a good thing. Same with how is the forward ejecting shells a bad thing? It was design to be a good thing.

[soccom8341576]

I think the QBZ-95 still has a long way to go. To begin with, I think they can make it easier for lefties to use and make sure that spent casing doesn't fly that far.

Also, it needs some rails so attaching stuff onto it. Sooner or later, they'll need some reflex sights.

But again, bullpups have yet to be used in a large scale conflict.

[TechGuyatNY]

the QBZ-95 has always come with standard picatinny rails. the standard mount for it is a 4x optical scope, but mounting reflex sights is just as matter of seconds. but yeah, i agree that there still needs to be more RIS, for easy mounting of lasers, lights, IRs, grips, bipods, etc. a shell deflector on the upper receiver would also be nice

dont have to worry about lefties in china haha, we're trained (by our mothers) to always use our right, otherwise, we get spanked on the left hand.

[soccom8341576]

LOL! Interesting.

[Murmedon]

Lol, that is true. Traditionally, all chinese were taught to write with their right hand even if they were left handed.

[Laddre]

before everyone did that in every country. my mother in the 70s was taught to write with the right hand. it comes from when u used to write on blackbords and if you wrot with your left hand you erased the stuff you just wrote

[Bladed0edge0razor]

....really??? please tell me how it works??? to make a child use their right hand if their left handed!

[fludblud]

by forcing them, practice enough and any hand can be as good as the other.

which brings up the notion that 'nobody in china is left handed, they are either right handed or ambidextrous'

[Scabstermooch]

Remember this is state media. There is likely to be more than an element of propaganda involved.

According to wikipedia, the TAR 21 is considerably shorter than the Type 95. The barrel length is virtually identical. That will be why they did not bring out the tavor.

:)

[TechGuyatNY]

however, the tavor tends to slam-fire by accident, even with the gun on safety :P. very dangerous i should say. the qbz-95 doesnt do this. but i guess gun safety is the least of israeli concerns, no offense

[esh325]

I agree it's hard to take this video more seriously because of that.

[fludblud]

wrong, according to worldguns, the barrel length of the type 95 is 520mm

barrel length of standard TAR-21 460mm

M16, 508 mm

AUG, 508 mm

AK47/AKM 415 mm

in fact, the only assault rifle that comes close to the type 95 is the SA80 with a barrel lenth of 518 mm

[NebPWN]

noob, for bullpup design, the barrel is concealed in the body of the rifle, so it can have better accuracy while maintaining its length

[gamehazard101]

thats for the standard version. the carbine variation (QBZ-97B) is much shorter although i don't know the exact length. thats the one he was talking about when comparing to the AUG.

[jobjed]

the longer the barrel length the more accurate. the good thing about the qbz-95 is that its accurate but the overall length is short.

[kightremin]

@fludblud the news is talking about the total length of firearm, not the the barrel length.

[kightremin]

@fludblud @fludblud the news is talking about the total length of firearm, not the the barrel length.

[ThaBlackN1gga]

@Scabstermooch Obviously China won't bring that up. They are trying to promote their rifle. Our US doesn't mention the flaws of it's M16 design. They don't mention the flawed M16A2 burst mechanism. The trigger group does not reset when the trigger is released. If the user releases the trigger between the second and third round of the burst, for example, the next trigger pull would only result in a single shot. Worse, each trigger pull generates random pressure which detracts from accuracy.

[sometaaw]

@Scabstermooch

TAR-21 fires the 5.56 ammunition... simillar bullpup concept to the AUG

if they are going to put every rifle the L85A1, FAMAS, SAR-21 and other bullpups might have to be compared

[alongthebluff]

@Scabstermooch

Not really, they are pretty modest actually.

They never claim the QBZ-95 is the best on this planet.

TAR-21 is much newer than QBZ-95.

[Excalibur01]

Too bad they couldnt compare to other bullpup designs like the Tavor, the L85, the SAR-21, or the FN2000

[TechGuyatNY]

easy

tavor: slam fire malfunction, L85: jammed (new version is fixed though but with delays on full auto), sar21: lower recoil, f2000: casing ejects forward, qbz95: more recoil, more stopping power, reliability in sand/water/mud, shorter effective range than the other bullpup rifles

[Excalibur01]

I don't know tech guy about the working in sand, water, and mud like it's the bullpup equal to the AK and H&K 416. I only saw the demo soldier in the vid put the rifle in water, unloaded, not chambered, and waited more than 10 seconds, MORE than enough time to drain all the water before loading mag, chambering and firing. Do that to any gun, and it'll be fine to shoot.

[jack99889988]

go search somemore on the google, there is a pic when the type 95 was fully covered by mud when a soldier was shooting it