@XRockVstarI499 You hear more than one voice, because it's a fugue (from the sound of it one a 4 voices). But it is only one violin. From what I've heard, these fugues are supossed to be among the most difficult pieces for solo violin. To hear it being played with so much clarity and expressiveness is rare.
@XRockVstarI499 Bach transform violin in polyphonic instrument by writing a fugue for solo violin. There's to several violins but there's several voices in the music. We are accustomed to ear violin as a monodic instrument with the romantic traditionnal way of playing.
beautiful..even though violinist each have a certain style and tecnique music comes from the heart. Just to grab an instruement and make music with another to fuse two ideas. That is true music.
I met a gorgeous woman last night in a bar. She had rather classical features, so i asked her if she wanted to come back to my place for some "raw Bach action."
A somewhat different interpretation as compared to most of the recordings of this piece by other violin greats. Menuhin, maybe because he was very young, brings a lot of passion and cutting edge to this performance. And his interpretation of the passage between 3:04 and 3:33 is very individualistic and my favourite among all. Those who doubt his technique are requested to kindly upload their own videos showing their own techniques on the violin.
it was a common eighteenth century practise to write the key of d minor with no flats and g minor with 1 flat. i dunno why. i'm guessing that it's because, just using this piece as an example, bach messes around with the major/minor modality so much that he'd have to write more e naturals than e flats, and keys had only been standardised during the renaissance.
Someone was so blown away that they were tearing up and accidentally clicked the dislike button. Nonetheless, this interpretation was played with so much passion that the music seems to be alive. Instead of notes on music, this is pure skill mixed with years of experience, manifesting itself as one of the best recording ever made. Spectacular.
his interpretation is actually very nice. I like it. But it is a bit too fast for me. If he played with the same interpretation but at a slower tempo, I think it will be so beautiful that I can cry listening to it :)
@blubbifrosch thank you so much for this comment - I've spent the last half hour trying to figure out how to spell Szeryng's name so I could find him!
@blubbifrosch Pretty poor comparison. As amazing as both violinists are, Menuhin is truly a legend, while slightly faster than Szeryng, Menuhin puts incredible phrasing into this piece.
he has always been one of my favorites, he has always moved me in a way that heifetz with all his computer like perfection never could. menhuin simply brings an intangible to his playing. thanks
@: shiveringflower@backdooruser I absolutely agree with you. The small faults in Menuhin's playing are only human , if anything it adds to the charm. Nevertheless his playing is always full of life, character and emotion, in the end this is what music is all about! While it is great to achieve technical perfection, on its own serves little purpose.
Menuhin is proof that technical exactitude is not necessarily what brilliant play is all about. There is something more here--an ability to live in the music itself. Musicians of this calibre are rare.
@backdooruser Some of it is triple stopped,with some broken quadruple stops towards the end.Triple and quadruple stops are easier on a baroque set up.BUT, the flatter bridge and baroque bow are not the whole story.There is an autograph score which shows quadruple stops (in some of the movements of differing Sonatas and Partitas) with fingerings directing that the lowest and highest notes are both to be played with the 1st finger-clearly indicating that the chord should be played arpeggio.
i normally don't like it when people change bach, but he does this thing at 0:54 where he changes the second D in the top voice to a C#, which creates a chromatic run that goes D, C#, C, (B), Bb, A.
i don't know if bach would have approved, but i certainly like it.
wow I have no idea what you're talking about and I've been playing the guitar for two years, just goes to show how much more there is for me to learn. Thanks for showing me that.
i just think his sensibility in harmony is better than the lot of us, so changing note pitches is pretty risky. most of the time, any changes that people make are sort of interesting on the surface but tend to distract from subtle overarching harmonic ideas, which is where much of bach's big ambitious ideas are.
on the other hand, i see nothing wrong with changing instrumentation or dynamics in bach's music, and i'm sure bach himself wouldn't mind either.
I think he was only 18 or something when he recorded the partitas. There's sooo much passion into what he's playing! Technical perfection is sacrificed here for some raw Bach action.
you can't really say that he didn't play it as well as Szeryng. he has a different style and someone that i'm guessing can't play it as well as menuhin or at all for that matter has no right to say something so derogatory. :)
who played this with him?
XRockVstarI499 2 months ago
@XRockVstarI499 lol. noone!!!
troglodyt1 2 months ago
@troglodyt1 really? or is my ear playing games? i think i heard 2 violins in there ~.~
XRockVstarI499 2 months ago
@XRockVstarI499 You hear more than one voice, because it's a fugue (from the sound of it one a 4 voices). But it is only one violin. From what I've heard, these fugues are supossed to be among the most difficult pieces for solo violin. To hear it being played with so much clarity and expressiveness is rare.
troglodyt1 2 months ago
@XRockVstarI499 Bach transform violin in polyphonic instrument by writing a fugue for solo violin. There's to several violins but there's several voices in the music. We are accustomed to ear violin as a monodic instrument with the romantic traditionnal way of playing.
polszik 1 month ago
perfection indeed.
shineelover16 3 months ago
Comment removed
TheBWAAA59 7 months ago
bah c'est Menuhin quoi...
TheBWAAA59 7 months ago
beautiful..even though violinist each have a certain style and tecnique music comes from the heart. Just to grab an instruement and make music with another to fuse two ideas. That is true music.
bboystarchild 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I met a gorgeous woman last night in a bar. She had rather classical features, so i asked her if she wanted to come back to my place for some "raw Bach action."
She threw a baton in my face.
cableaddict 9 months ago
Comment removed
cableaddict 9 months ago
did Menuhin compose any pieces?, i would love to hear his compositions!
dwayne515 9 months ago
@dwayne515 No, he didn't. But good, that you ask....composers are underrated nowadays...
mariusfelix 6 months ago
A somewhat different interpretation as compared to most of the recordings of this piece by other violin greats. Menuhin, maybe because he was very young, brings a lot of passion and cutting edge to this performance. And his interpretation of the passage between 3:04 and 3:33 is very individualistic and my favourite among all. Those who doubt his technique are requested to kindly upload their own videos showing their own techniques on the violin.
parachutes2005 10 months ago
it was a common eighteenth century practise to write the key of d minor with no flats and g minor with 1 flat. i dunno why. i'm guessing that it's because, just using this piece as an example, bach messes around with the major/minor modality so much that he'd have to write more e naturals than e flats, and keys had only been standardised during the renaissance.
*strokes beard*
harpyams 10 months ago
@harpyams thank you. unlike donesixfour, you could actually answer it.
jmastaflash1000 10 months ago
why does the key signature have only one flat if it's in g minor?
jmastaflash1000 11 months ago
@jmastaflash1000 because.
donesixfour 11 months ago
chef-d'œuvre.
Dnomasorneiluj 11 months ago
What happens at 0:36 is simply magical..... take it from 0:29 to hear the effect. Those little birds right after the rough playing. Ah, Bach!
pepamicro 1 year ago 2
Someone was so blown away that they were tearing up and accidentally clicked the dislike button. Nonetheless, this interpretation was played with so much passion that the music seems to be alive. Instead of notes on music, this is pure skill mixed with years of experience, manifesting itself as one of the best recording ever made. Spectacular.
goodcommentguy 1 year ago 2
I have to say, I think it's pretty cool that Bach actually conceived a fugue for solo stringed instrument.
b0ttomzone 1 year ago 4
3:05 I love how timid he's being in this whole section. Usually I hear it played up, but it's nice to hear it backed away from the action.
fryfry377 1 year ago
It was beautiful...
lenaszamoca 1 year ago
wooow,man i know that perfection has no limits but this interpretation is out of any kind of critics!
trombulan 1 year ago
this is absolutely brilliant
and that Cannot be denied
anyone who dares post any sort of criticism is a fool
gayhax 1 year ago
his interpretation is actually very nice. I like it. But it is a bit too fast for me. If he played with the same interpretation but at a slower tempo, I think it will be so beautiful that I can cry listening to it :)
wanimusician 1 year ago
too fast!!! Listen to Henryk Szeryng...
blubbifrosch 1 year ago
@blubbifrosch thank you so much for this comment - I've spent the last half hour trying to figure out how to spell Szeryng's name so I could find him!
Lapez13 1 year ago
@blubbifrosch Pretty poor comparison. As amazing as both violinists are, Menuhin is truly a legend, while slightly faster than Szeryng, Menuhin puts incredible phrasing into this piece.
GenocidegingerInc 1 year ago
he has always been one of my favorites, he has always moved me in a way that heifetz with all his computer like perfection never could. menhuin simply brings an intangible to his playing. thanks
operalament 1 year ago
@: shiveringflower@backdooruser I absolutely agree with you. The small faults in Menuhin's playing are only human , if anything it adds to the charm. Nevertheless his playing is always full of life, character and emotion, in the end this is what music is all about! While it is great to achieve technical perfection, on its own serves little purpose.
Bachismydiety 1 year ago
SORRY, I meant @: KSudbury
Bachismydiety 1 year ago
Menuhin is proof that technical exactitude is not necessarily what brilliant play is all about. There is something more here--an ability to live in the music itself. Musicians of this calibre are rare.
KSudbury 1 year ago
te amo
nancymmv 1 year ago 3
I don't like this interpretation, Szeryng is better :)
PaulinaMazurkiewicz 1 year ago
Did Menuhin play two violins at the same time of recording??
paopaomanalansan 1 year ago
no, it is double stopping and pure genius.
backdooruser 1 year ago
@backdooruser Some of it is triple stopped,with some broken quadruple stops towards the end.Triple and quadruple stops are easier on a baroque set up.BUT, the flatter bridge and baroque bow are not the whole story.There is an autograph score which shows quadruple stops (in some of the movements of differing Sonatas and Partitas) with fingerings directing that the lowest and highest notes are both to be played with the 1st finger-clearly indicating that the chord should be played arpeggio.
shiveringflower 1 year ago
BELLO NO HAY PALABRAS!!!
domisofa 1 year ago 2
I like it, but listen to Henryk Szeryng, he plays it much better...
c1HuK 1 year ago
@c1HuK That could be just because of the sound quality- this is an older version. I like both anyway- great piece.
1023george 1 year ago
fantastic!!! would like to see this in video... amazing :)
AmelieWuensche 1 year ago
I love how he doesn't let the chords deter the counterpoint and flow of the music
compmeist 2 years ago 2
Very good!
TheRickmate 2 years ago
Now I will love practicing arrpeggios
thelawya 2 years ago 3
@thelawya I dont know how anyone could ever 'love' practicing arpeggios!
1023george 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
was yehudi in a hurry when he was recording this?? why so fast and anxious? this is BACH, pure baroque...
crazy77town 2 years ago
I'd like to hear your performance. :X
falstocat 1 year ago
well, I wouldn't even dare to compare myself to all of those giants of the 20th century in general! the result would be just a matter of logic...
however, you should definitely listen to szeryng's edition in order to open up your horizons, you will find a completely different world...
the pure baroque
crazy77town 1 year ago
Menuhin and few violinst are the best in the world.I think he is perfect.
puffo3500 2 years ago
wowza.
Felix892 2 years ago 2
VERY WONDERFULL
TheJordiii 2 years ago 3
WONDERFULL
Cyrloud 2 years ago 2
Great stuff. JS Bach; Legend of legends!!
Jagguar20 2 years ago 3
i normally don't like it when people change bach, but he does this thing at 0:54 where he changes the second D in the top voice to a C#, which creates a chromatic run that goes D, C#, C, (B), Bb, A.
i don't know if bach would have approved, but i certainly like it.
sorry for the jargon rant.
reinux 2 years ago 5
wow I have no idea what you're talking about and I've been playing the guitar for two years, just goes to show how much more there is for me to learn. Thanks for showing me that.
WachaDrop 2 years ago
please tell me you were reading the score!
if you noticed that without it, i'm going to feel like real idiot!
Newtacious 2 years ago
i wish i could read along fast enough to notice it that way.
i'm really, really slow to read music, so i usually don't have much of a choice but to memorize things before i play them.
reinux 2 years ago
Why does everyone think Bach was so stuck up? I'm sure he would love new ideas being incorporated into his music.
Tonys714 2 years ago 4
i just think his sensibility in harmony is better than the lot of us, so changing note pitches is pretty risky. most of the time, any changes that people make are sort of interesting on the surface but tend to distract from subtle overarching harmonic ideas, which is where much of bach's big ambitious ideas are.
on the other hand, i see nothing wrong with changing instrumentation or dynamics in bach's music, and i'm sure bach himself wouldn't mind either.
reinux 2 years ago 2
i like this song.
cici19820505 2 years ago 3
I think he was only 18 or something when he recorded the partitas. There's sooo much passion into what he's playing! Technical perfection is sacrificed here for some raw Bach action.
Jinanibob 3 years ago 11
This has been flagged as spam show
Didn t like it at all. Szeryng 100 times better.
milstein91 3 years ago
your immature for saying it like you did, just because you didnt like him playing.
bbiguy 3 years ago 3
I'm just giving my opinion and that isn't beeing immature.
milstein91 3 years ago
but you could have worded it better.
you can't really say that he didn't play it as well as Szeryng. he has a different style and someone that i'm guessing can't play it as well as menuhin or at all for that matter has no right to say something so derogatory. :)
thewoman92m 3 years ago 9
menuhin was very young when he played this , in my opinion in their primes menuhin was much better than szeyng
festershred 3 years ago
thanks for these new audio, great!
elmae999 3 years ago 2
Excellent. Menuhin was the first to introduce me to Beethoven's Violin Concerto in D-Major (I think thats the key). Anyway, great video.
ApsisApocynthion 3 years ago