Bobby, even you are passing along false innuendo. They aren't 'bad scientists' it has not been proven that they did anything wrong. You just fell for one of the creationists'... er scratch that, climate deniers' fantasies and passed it along as truth. Did you try and check what the E-Mails actually mean? The E-mail that refers to 'mike's nature trick' refers to a legitimate algorithm used to try and fix the anomalous correlations between the proxy data and human recorded data.
The decline referred to, isn't a decline in actual temperature, but a decline in the agreements between different sets of data; particular that the modern contemporary tree ring data doesn't show the warming as it did from about 50 years ago. It is suspected to pollution is responsible for that also.
please check:
watch?v=7nnVQ2fROOg
&
watch?v=uXesBhYwdRo
Then send off an apology to them with your correction.
On rich liberals, That is not being liberal. That is being republican in light
imaginepeace63 2 years ago
(1/2)
Bobby, even you are passing along false innuendo. They aren't 'bad scientists' it has not been proven that they did anything wrong. You just fell for one of the creationists'... er scratch that, climate deniers' fantasies and passed it along as truth. Did you try and check what the E-Mails actually mean? The E-mail that refers to 'mike's nature trick' refers to a legitimate algorithm used to try and fix the anomalous correlations between the proxy data and human recorded data.
Rundstedt1 2 years ago
(2/2)
The decline referred to, isn't a decline in actual temperature, but a decline in the agreements between different sets of data; particular that the modern contemporary tree ring data doesn't show the warming as it did from about 50 years ago. It is suspected to pollution is responsible for that also.
please check:
watch?v=7nnVQ2fROOg
&
watch?v=uXesBhYwdRo
Then send off an apology to them with your correction.
Rundstedt1 2 years ago