The picture can only be viewed on the LCD after the shot has been taken. You can playback all previous shots too. I feel that the live view is unnecessary because in bright lighting conditions it is hard to see the LCD on any camera model. This is a great camera if it is your first DSLR.
Just got my A230 now from Jacobs in derby in the uk on sale at a quite impressive £329 ( $525) down from £350 ($558) and even better with their club jacobs they extend the warranty aswell on DSLR bodies (no lens extended cover) for free !
The grip could be a little better but it's not that bad the Remote Sensor could have been better placed though and the only other problem so far is the flash it's far to bright but I now have it set to rear flash mode or something but it's ok.
By "live feed" does that mean on the A230 you cant actually view your shot in the LCD before taking the picture, you have to look through the viewfinder? does that seem really primitive, i can do that on my 3mp old cybershot like?? is the LCD only there to look at your pictures afterwards? or can you even do that...
A demo by a Sony alpha product manager himself? Brilliant!
I recently got myself a A330. Can't tell you lot how impressed I'm with it's performance. Outstanding on all levels. Don't waste your time thinking about Canon/Nikon/Other.
Go for it. It's in between 230 and 380. You'll never regret!
I have been looking at both the A200 and A230 the A200 has compact flash and bigger lens but the A230 has HDMI output and is Dual memory support (SD & MS DUO) like others the 230 will be my first DSLR Jessops in the uk are really good the lady in there showed me loads of bit's on the camera like how big the battery is , lens changing , some of the menu options and how they work. I was in there for about 30 mins I Intend to get mine from them on the 28th Just after christmas day and boxing day.
If only that were the case, they are in fact in most ways worse than the models they replaced. Slowest fps on the market, worse battery life, poor ergonomics and design..buttons missing, etc
Folks should hunt out the A200/300/350 instead, you'll be glad you did..
I want the a380, hopefully getting it for xmas, But have heard that on high ISO settings you get alot of noise. Also the D3000, & D5000 from Nikon looking tempting. However no image stabillizer built in. What do you guys thinks?
oh no... old 35 mm cameras can do it, and I know most new dslrs can as well. It's often used for astrophotography, for dark little fuzzy objects in the sky that can barely be seen with the naked eye. There are some tutorials on youtube about long exposure photography.
Why do you all care so much how they look??? They'll find new owners,of that I'm sure! Does anybody care 'bout the way the pics look? They-re great for budget DSLR's!
I always thought that a DSLR means having the opportunity to shoot way better (and way more creative)pics comparing to compacts, and not necessary a big chunky cam, that looks "pro", so you can show off.
They keep making and selling the older models, so why not just thank them for thinking 'bout other people?Girls,for ex...
I really, really prefer the look of the A200 over the new 230/380 designs. The shutter button on the new designs in my opinion is just horribly placed. I mean, with a DSLR I want to feel like I'm using a DSLR, not an extra bulky compact!
i have an a300 i after looking at a few reviews of the 330 and 380 they actually prefer the a300 as they sa it seems more professional and less gimicky.
This camera doesn't offer a HD video option, but if your like me, I would prefer to actually use a HD video recorder that is designed for video recording. The main reason Sony hasnt implemented one is due to there Live View design using a seperate sensor. The live view on these cameras is easily the best out of all. Than again I do prefer view finders, it seems to add more stabability when the camera is held to ur face.
ok im thinking of buying my first dslr camera and im really thinking of getting the a330. should i go for it or getting the a300 wont really make a lot of difference. i really need an opinion on this. thank you very much.
barryfitzgerald29 is saying; I have read full previews on the A380 and it seems exactly the same as the A350 execpt for a better user interface and a lower spec build. I would also recommend that you go for the older A200/300/350 series. :)
East. A230 v A200 Down from 3fps to 2.5fps No wired remote socket No AEL button No flash raise button No Program shift option No Kelvin WB and filters choice Cannot change settings in auto or subject models, aka jpeg setting are locked, no exposure compensation Battery life down from 750 CIPA to just over 500 shots. In many areas, it's been downgraded..use the thumbs down when you check the facts ist!
all the new "mid" range slr's are crazy small if i am going to buy a camera for 900 that looks just like a 500 dollar camera ??? not counting nikon beacuse the d90 is 1200 bucks and its just as small for some reason when you go over 1000 bucks for a body they look way more pro, 50d, a700,d300 good size with great performance
Image Quality: It isn't to bad, but I've seed better small compact cameras, that are a lot cheaper. I own a alpha a200, and I must say that the image quality is a lot better on my camera. So, my conclusion is... don't buy these new models, becouse its not worth it. Rather buy an a200, or s300, a350.
DOesn't seem like they really changed anything... upgrading from an A300 to A330 is like switching from Ti-83 to Ti-84. Same thing just looks different.
It's not meant to be an upgrade to a300 :) It's an update to the old camera for new users for their first DSLR. The owners of the a300 should go to a 700 or wait for the rumoured a500
I bought the a300 about 3 months ago, so far a great camera, i want to upgrade my body eventually any suggestions? I'm looking at the specs of this camera, and since its newer, but im not 100% confident
I own a A200 and i like it, I see that Sony only changed the design and they did it very well i see.. good job SONY go grab more costumers it's becoming ur golden age now ;)
i think the whole point of a DSLR is so the cameras are actually big...im not a big fan of a small dslr......but then again technology always smiles back to say yeahh right bitchh...ha
Not impressed with the design at all. The A200 feels and looks a lot better piece of kit. again I'm another that will jump to the 700 or 900 and not just upgrade to what looks like a cheaper made camera.
On the plus side Sony are having a great impact on the DSLR market and helping drive prices on entry level kit down.
No HD video mode on any of the new cams 230 330 or 380. This option is offered by all the big name brands now, which would easily eliminate Sony from the potential purchase list.
On a positive note:
Adding SD card was an awesome move by Sony. (Lack of this always kept me away from Sony)
Retaining the vari angle LCD was another good idea.
New shape is nice but splitting the color on a line I wasn't a big fan of.
They look tiny. This is the reason I had to get a Nikon D80 when I bought my dslr. It was the cheapest camera I could find that actually felt comfortable in my hands! I know the trend in technology is to make things as small and compact as possible, but I still need the damn thing to fit in my large hands please! :o(
hehe yeah an entry level a380 to 800$, don't compare it to people who just wants better pictures, because they can surely get great pictures from compacts too. It has nothing to do with looking cool, do you know me?, have you used a dslr yourself?, why do you think canon has gotten so much fuzz for the small body's on 400/450d.... as usual its impossible to mean anything on youtube without getting all kind of assumption's back!
Live view is NOT exclusive to Sony :D
hyperfocus2011 2 weeks ago
Just got the A380 for $99
Russia241 5 months ago
Does the a380 take videos in hd?
dontmoveamuscle 1 year ago
How much are both of these?? :)
Ponyriider 1 year ago
john travolta sosie??? mdr
mickmax85 1 year ago 2
whats the camera that you used to film this ? looks pretty clear and high quality !!!!
digmandu11 1 year ago
that sony dude looks like john travolta! lol
prizzom 1 year ago
can you manual focus with this ring on the objective?
FelixGoesAround 1 year ago
@FelixGoesAround Yes you can.
WhatDigitalCamera 1 year ago
@WhatDigitalCamera what camera is this video filmed with
IAmBlubba 8 months ago
does the a380 have an auto hdr
alnakhli999 1 year ago
can i zoom with the manual focus? or is it automatic on the a380?
akleiv94 1 year ago
Can you use the LDC View finder on the a230 to take pictures insted of using the viewfinder?
AlphaDDC07 1 year ago
@AlphaDDC07 No. Only on the a380.
WhatDigitalCamera 1 year ago
@WhatDigitalCamera and 330
DTxOctavariumx 1 year ago
i found a local seller selling a SONY ALPHA DSLR-A230L for $100 is it worth it im just a beginner photographer
easyliving02 1 year ago
@easyliving02 a very great deal. is that a second hand or something?
kkjgg112391 1 year ago
@kkjgg112391 yeah its was second hand but the seller isnt selling any more so im just searching around again
easyliving02 1 year ago
@easyliving02 search on ebay there are some great deals. I got my a330 for 350, which isnt near your 100 but it is nevertheless a GREAT deal ^^
dbstjdals 1 year ago
i'm about to buy my first DSLR, so i think i'm going with the 230
mathiaslclassen 1 year ago
If i take a picture on the Sony Alpha 230, will the picture be previewed in the LCD?
ragenumbers 2 years ago
The picture can only be viewed on the LCD after the shot has been taken. You can playback all previous shots too. I feel that the live view is unnecessary because in bright lighting conditions it is hard to see the LCD on any camera model. This is a great camera if it is your first DSLR.
djruss84 2 years ago
yes, after you take a picture, it will be displayed on the LCD screen for about 4 seconds.
Happy photog!
cmf31300 1 year ago
@ragenumbers yes.
kkjgg112391 1 year ago
Just got my A230 now from Jacobs in derby in the uk on sale at a quite impressive £329 ( $525) down from £350 ($558) and even better with their club jacobs they extend the warranty aswell on DSLR bodies (no lens extended cover) for free !
The grip could be a little better but it's not that bad the Remote Sensor could have been better placed though and the only other problem so far is the flash it's far to bright but I now have it set to rear flash mode or something but it's ok.
Timsalt3100 2 years ago
By "live feed" does that mean on the A230 you cant actually view your shot in the LCD before taking the picture, you have to look through the viewfinder? does that seem really primitive, i can do that on my 3mp old cybershot like?? is the LCD only there to look at your pictures afterwards? or can you even do that...
bossisdead 2 years ago
A demo by a Sony alpha product manager himself? Brilliant!
I recently got myself a A330. Can't tell you lot how impressed I'm with it's performance. Outstanding on all levels. Don't waste your time thinking about Canon/Nikon/Other.
Go for it. It's in between 230 and 380. You'll never regret!
MsApproximately 2 years ago 2
I have been looking at both the A200 and A230 the A200 has compact flash and bigger lens but the A230 has HDMI output and is Dual memory support (SD & MS DUO) like others the 230 will be my first DSLR Jessops in the uk are really good the lady in there showed me loads of bit's on the camera like how big the battery is , lens changing , some of the menu options and how they work. I was in there for about 30 mins I Intend to get mine from them on the 28th Just after christmas day and boxing day.
Timsalt3100 2 years ago
Is the a230 better than a200. Which to choose?I'm a beginner.
szmiki9536 2 years ago
200 is better
etsme 2 years ago
The camera are great expect for the small grip
CharlieCorrupted 2 years ago
If only that were the case, they are in fact in most ways worse than the models they replaced. Slowest fps on the market, worse battery life, poor ergonomics and design..buttons missing, etc
Folks should hunt out the A200/300/350 instead, you'll be glad you did..
barryfitzgerald29 2 years ago
I want the a380, hopefully getting it for xmas, But have heard that on high ISO settings you get alot of noise. Also the D3000, & D5000 from Nikon looking tempting. However no image stabillizer built in. What do you guys thinks?
curlyman124 2 years ago
Im getting the a380 in a few weeks.
And I heard the picture are fantastic but it gets a bit of noise starting around 1600 ISO
CharlieCorrupted 2 years ago
@CharlieCorrupted Fuck the 1600 ISO. I have A380 2 months now with 2 lenses, 18-55mm and 18-250mm. I am just in love with them!!
TheHellenicFire 2 years ago
I actually went with the a500 and its got 22-12800ISO ;3
CharlieCorrupted 2 years ago
Can the 230 do long exposure? Like can you just set the shutter to stay open for two hours or so til the battery runs out?
scottohscott 2 years ago
I dont think any camera can do that, it seems pointless because so much light would enter the camera and just make the image solid white
CharlieCorrupted 2 years ago
oh no... old 35 mm cameras can do it, and I know most new dslrs can as well. It's often used for astrophotography, for dark little fuzzy objects in the sky that can barely be seen with the naked eye. There are some tutorials on youtube about long exposure photography.
scottohscott 2 years ago
Why do you all care so much how they look??? They'll find new owners,of that I'm sure! Does anybody care 'bout the way the pics look? They-re great for budget DSLR's!
I always thought that a DSLR means having the opportunity to shoot way better (and way more creative)pics comparing to compacts, and not necessary a big chunky cam, that looks "pro", so you can show off.
They keep making and selling the older models, so why not just thank them for thinking 'bout other people?Girls,for ex...
IronAmethyst 2 years ago
which is better a200, a230 or a300(those are what are in my budget)... im not sure which one to get
waggygee 2 years ago
got the a230 yesterday! :D
uno2004 2 years ago 15
how good is the zoom on it?
iChanceC 2 years ago
@uno2004 me too ^-^
JeSuisHungry 1 year ago
a230 its my , very good camera !
i like it
andreuchik 2 years ago
can you record video with the a230?
fsx767 2 years ago
i want the 230 so bad.... $100 down, $400 more to find :]]]
im planning to get one this xmas :D
iNeedOut 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
LOL at 5:59. Lucky it wasn't a woman sitting next to him!
Regardless of the features, Sony make the ugliest DSLRs on the market IMO.
vermillionsands 2 years ago
shocking, its turned into a shitty compact, very poor!!!!
golffootball 2 years ago
Matt and Eric should of fucked on this video instead of talking about cameras.
Century2324 2 years ago
lol erm...
sk8jon 2 years ago
Who needs a wired remote socket.. -_-..
It's compatible with the wireless remote.
tenderhate 2 years ago
alottt smaller than the a200 and a350
PRAGMATICIST 2 years ago
I really, really prefer the look of the A200 over the new 230/380 designs. The shutter button on the new designs in my opinion is just horribly placed. I mean, with a DSLR I want to feel like I'm using a DSLR, not an extra bulky compact!
NalaNosivad 2 years ago
i have an a300 i after looking at a few reviews of the 330 and 380 they actually prefer the a300 as they sa it seems more professional and less gimicky.
mastertrinity1993 2 years ago 3
This camera doesn't offer a HD video option, but if your like me, I would prefer to actually use a HD video recorder that is designed for video recording. The main reason Sony hasnt implemented one is due to there Live View design using a seperate sensor. The live view on these cameras is easily the best out of all. Than again I do prefer view finders, it seems to add more stabability when the camera is held to ur face.
SheldonA27 2 years ago
ok im thinking of buying my first dslr camera and im really thinking of getting the a330. should i go for it or getting the a300 wont really make a lot of difference. i really need an opinion on this. thank you very much.
kanzaki88 2 years ago
Go for the A300, you'll probably be able to get a good deal before the new models come in. Either way their all cracking bits of kit.
bwfc4eva86 2 years ago
dont get a 330, go for a 300 or 350. but thats just my opinion.
mike5000x 2 years ago 3
go for the a330, if you cant get the nikon d90.
miguel88ms99 2 years ago
Pay more for less, compared to the last series these new ones are downgraded in many areas. Hunt out an A200/300/350 ignore these ones
barryfitzgerald29 2 years ago
Do you care to elaborate on those claims for me? Just curious
DarthMartin89 2 years ago
There is a lot of truth in what
barryfitzgerald29 is saying; I have read full previews on the A380 and it seems exactly the same as the A350 execpt for a better user interface and a lower spec build. I would also recommend that you go for the older A200/300/350 series. :)
18vallancel 2 years ago 4
barryfitzgerald29 2 years ago 9
oh snap DSLRs is huge /hugs his ULTRA compact camera
Heroic21 2 years ago
What do you guys think will happen with the a200? Will sony stop producing them? How about the prize? will it drop?
Atte000 2 years ago
carl zeiss 1680z are inredible..
miguel88ms99 2 years ago
damn, i want one of those!!!.....
mikess 2 years ago
ya i agree to small
all the new "mid" range slr's are crazy small if i am going to buy a camera for 900 that looks just like a 500 dollar camera ??? not counting nikon beacuse the d90 is 1200 bucks and its just as small for some reason when you go over 1000 bucks for a body they look way more pro, 50d, a700,d300 good size with great performance
socal1000 2 years ago
will the old lens be compatible to these new babies? e.g SAL18200
BCfan159 2 years ago
yes
Gaston4419 2 years ago
Image Quality: It isn't to bad, but I've seed better small compact cameras, that are a lot cheaper. I own a alpha a200, and I must say that the image quality is a lot better on my camera. So, my conclusion is... don't buy these new models, becouse its not worth it. Rather buy an a200, or s300, a350.
Hope this will help u decide!:)
bye!
tadej172 2 years ago 2
one word. "simple". love this cam.
mjy1990 2 years ago
love the leica r9 look, hope new 5 series will have this look as well
titan10kk 2 years ago
Too small, if you have large hands.
tsiya2 2 years ago
DOesn't seem like they really changed anything... upgrading from an A300 to A330 is like switching from Ti-83 to Ti-84. Same thing just looks different.
GLXLR 2 years ago
It's not meant to be an upgrade to a300 :) It's an update to the old camera for new users for their first DSLR. The owners of the a300 should go to a 700 or wait for the rumoured a500
ThePolite1 2 years ago
Sony is walking back!
kingsvell 2 years ago
I used the A200 & I completly agree with you
samiminh 2 years ago
I recently upgraded to the A330 from my A300. I'm very pleased with the A330, considering that it is much lighter and more simplified to use.
NA4cyl 2 years ago
looks ugly and cheap
glydeuserhelp 2 years ago
I bought the a300 about 3 months ago, so far a great camera, i want to upgrade my body eventually any suggestions? I'm looking at the specs of this camera, and since its newer, but im not 100% confident
TheHubologist 2 years ago
a 700 is a great upgrade
aerospace82 2 years ago 3
I own a A200 and i like it, I see that Sony only changed the design and they did it very well i see.. good job SONY go grab more costumers it's becoming ur golden age now ;)
zigi888 2 years ago
Ive got the a 300, its awesome, sony did not really new cool stuff, thats a shame i think....
MrBeunhaas 2 years ago
i like/hate how theyre turning the dslrs more into point and shoots.
theyre getting smaller and coming in different colors like the pink screens...
owellllll.
YahDudeItsRlyMe 2 years ago 4
@ YahDudeItsRlyMe
yeah, I miss the days when DSLR's were big, black and dangerous.
someguy6481 2 years ago 3
i think the whole point of a DSLR is so the cameras are actually big...im not a big fan of a small dslr......but then again technology always smiles back to say yeahh right bitchh...ha
EB007911 2 years ago 2
Not impressed with the design at all. The A200 feels and looks a lot better piece of kit. again I'm another that will jump to the 700 or 900 and not just upgrade to what looks like a cheaper made camera.
On the plus side Sony are having a great impact on the DSLR market and helping drive prices on entry level kit down.
ChristopherTait 2 years ago 2
i agree with you about the design...i think that holding these cameras is going to be a bit akward....
pciades 2 years ago
Canon 50D ROCKS""""
mixmaxdix 2 years ago
was there any point of that other guy being there, that sony guy could of done it all him self
scotfever 2 years ago
whoa those things are tiny! haha
timmyguy13 2 years ago
No HD video mode on any of the new cams 230 330 or 380. This option is offered by all the big name brands now, which would easily eliminate Sony from the potential purchase list.
On a positive note:
Adding SD card was an awesome move by Sony. (Lack of this always kept me away from Sony)
Retaining the vari angle LCD was another good idea.
New shape is nice but splitting the color on a line I wasn't a big fan of.
LTF85199 2 years ago
its hideous
wazzoooo95 2 years ago 2
They look tiny. This is the reason I had to get a Nikon D80 when I bought my dslr. It was the cheapest camera I could find that actually felt comfortable in my hands! I know the trend in technology is to make things as small and compact as possible, but I still need the damn thing to fit in my large hands please! :o(
Revoltingsheeple 2 years ago 3
After watch the review,i will stay with my A200
tanhockjun 2 years ago 2
Next camera for you should be rather A700 series not another entry level ( 200 and 30 series ) body...
Featinwe 2 years ago
I did'nt expect Sony to shrink down the cameras this much, quite disappointing imo.
1897i 2 years ago
Dude, those are ENTRY models, for guys who hust switched from compacts... we still wait fro "real" cameras.
Featinwe 2 years ago
It doesn't matter, DSLR's should not be compact, they should be steady and solid, a200 was a entry model, but at least it fits nice in the hand.
But yes, lets wait for the a700 replacement.
1897i 2 years ago
"DSLR's should not be compact," - tell it to Olympus ;-) Sony knows what's doing... Just see what it did during past two years...
Featinwe 2 years ago
I agree, they sure do, and i am a fan of them, just dont see the point of making things smaller (like canon uuh), thats all.
1897i 2 years ago
Comment removed
LTF85199 2 years ago
hehe yeah an entry level a380 to 800$, don't compare it to people who just wants better pictures, because they can surely get great pictures from compacts too. It has nothing to do with looking cool, do you know me?, have you used a dslr yourself?, why do you think canon has gotten so much fuzz for the small body's on 400/450d.... as usual its impossible to mean anything on youtube without getting all kind of assumption's back!
1897i 2 years ago
Comment removed
LTF85199 2 years ago