Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
MediaG3 has the answer! I was so happy when the FCC opened the "white space." Now schools, first responders, businesses and even individuals will benefit from this. Great step forward in opening the door to better communication.
MaxxsonicsUSAInc 1 year ago
This is great and the "T" for the golf ball set up by MediaG3 (MDGC)
cddilo 1 year ago
I hope it works out for my sake since I've invested in a ton of money in patent fees for this kind of device.
wxbugnathan 3 years ago
Irony alert!! In this interview Page is using a wireless microphone. Google claims that these are operating illegally, and if Google wins it and millions like it will be in landfills because they won't work because of interference from all the Google white space devices.
sjfuller 3 years ago
Google basically lost the FCC airwave auction and wants other airwaves for free. The free the airwaves movement basically wants to control of the airwaves that are presently used for radio microphones. Most people may not realize the importance of this spectrum, but enjoy the benefits of it every day. Motion pictures, TV, concerts, broadway type shows & church services use radio microphones. Without the benefit of these microphones the sound quality of these could go down the tubes.
mikeginla 3 years ago
Mobile personal devices are so different than TV broadcasters, a comparison is difficult. To begin with, the broadcasters are licensed and regulated with fixed frequencies, the mobile devices are to be designed to find an unused channel, likely unlicensed.
Secondly, in TV, the transmitter is at the top of a tower. A mobile device (obviously) moves around in location, with flexible frequency; the personal device is a TRANSMITTER. This makes interference so much more likely and unpredictable.
jharcn 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
For years the music industry has used this band for wireless microphones,and has co-existed with the television industry. now big money wants to cripple the music industry taking up all of this freq. spectrum for the use of wifi, with absolutely no mention to us it will render all the equip in our industry useless, funny how they forgot to mention that, think about that the next time you see a concert, broadway show, symphony performance, or even a newscaster that is wearing a wirless lapel mic.
danpoteete 3 years ago
Oops - meant to say "range" (last word of my previous comment)
ruffup 3 years ago
Larry Page is trying to convince us to support a drive to push congress to open up the spectrum around 700 MHz for internet access. The rationale is not yet clear. Larry tries to inform us, knowing the technology, but his presentation is incomplete. His reasoning may be sound but how can we be sure? WE NEED to know more about the technology. We need to know the spectrum's frequency range. And to know the odds of devices severely malfunctioning in that rage.
ruffup 3 years ago
nothing more to it you corporate swine!
jyoung0000 3 years ago
The rationale is perfectly clear: to make the internet more widely available. How is that not clear? "And to know the odds of devices severely malfunctioning in that range"? What are you talking about? Why would the range make devices more likely to malfunction? TVs have been doing fine in that range for decades.
lordlacolith 3 years ago
How does the proposal for new spectrum make "the internet" more WIDELY available? These devices would communicate through terrestrial radio towers, not satellites. Where are the towers going that cell phone (internet access) doesn't exist already?
jharcn 3 years ago