Added: 5 years ago
From: DemandAnswers
Views: 20,974
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (222)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Retsquid I am not talking about wages. I am talking about fair trade. You know when no "Gain" is made for trading an equal share of property for property:-)

    Your trolling is irrelevant to the cause and is null and void.

  • Its amazing how the United States Revenue Act comes into play the same year as the Federal Reserve ACT of 1913, what a coincidence. The Central Bank Cartel's WIN WIN Again!!!! We are so screwed. Ron Paul maybe perceived as a wack job, but he has this part right. Get rid of the "FED" AKA Bank Cartel and 95% of our problems are solved. Until you return the power of contolling the nations wealth back to the US Treasury at 0% interest and NO inflation. We would live within our means. CASE CLOSED!

  • "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable."

    -John F. Kennedy

    RetSquid is a fraud! notice how he always tries to discredit or ridicule people in his comments, i called him out a while back, he is ACTUALLY A FREEMASON! there is no worse or deluded [other than doctors] as freemasons

    a coward and a DISHONORABLE homo

  • God is on the side of the truth sayers

  • I told you when I give an equal share of labor for an equal share of money there is NO gain, wage, income, compensation, gross income!! None! Fair trade is just that! Fair trade! Your honor the defendant (Retsquid) does not understand the legal meaning of fair trade. He is also NOT a lawyer! Therefore I motion all frivolous ignorance from the defendant stricken!

  • @chrishufstetler

    You lose:

    “The taxpayer next argues that wages are not income but an exchange of property. As money is property and labor is property, so his argument goes, his work for wages is a non-taxable exchange of property. Wrong again. Wages are income. See, e.g., Schiff v. Commissioner, 751 F.2d 116, 117 (2d Cir. 1984). The argument that they are not has been rejected so frequently that the very raising of it justifies the imposition of sanctions.”

    Connor v. Commissioner

  • Income is defined as profits and gains. I don't make either! I give an equal share labor for an equal share of pay. Therefore it is not income it is fair trade!

  • @chrishufstetler

    So your gain was your pay, which is income and is taxable. Your 'fair trade' atrgument has failed in court every single tiem it has been tried...go look up Irwin Schiff.

  • Congress was granted the power to impose an income tax, however

    congress was never granted the broad power to impose such a tax on the vast majority of working americans.

    The income tax is contractual for most of us.

    For Individuals domiciled in the 50 states and who are not Federal employees, nor non resident alliens , the income tax is contractual. Liability only begins when the individual voluntarily enters into a contract with the government.

  • @Tealy855

    SECTION II.

    A. Subdivision 1. That there shall be levied, assessed, collected and paid annually upon the entire net income arising or accruing from all sources in the preceding calendar year to EVERY CITIZEN of the United States, whether residing at home or abroad, and to every person residing in the United States,

    The United States Revenue Act of 1913

  • @RetSquid BINGO!!

    the word income is very misleading

    ATTENTION AMERICA: Labor (wages) are not income. It is an exchange, therefore not a mandatory tax. The tax code does not define income.

  • @mikemamzic

    The definition of the word "income" is VERY simple.

    Wages ARE income, it is not an even exchange, you didn't pay anything for your labor so whatever your get paid for it is pure profit. The tax code DOES define "Gross income" and shows amny examples of what is included in that definition incuding "compensation for services" which is "wages".

  • Notice Retsquid never did answer my question. He compleated my Quest.

  • Wow this "argument" is really heaten up. Hay watch what I can do._-_-"///

    Oh Retsquid where art tho Retsquid ?

  • "Lay" means to put or place and always requires an object to finish its meaning.

    Levy is from lever which is the moving force.

  • A later influence on the language of the law was Scandinavian in origin. During the eighth century, Vikings began raiding the English coast and eventually settled down. The English borrowed from these Scandinavians the most important legal word in the English language: the word law itself. Law derives from the Norse word for "lay" and thus means "that which is laid down."

  • THE FEDERAL RESERVE

    It's a private monopoly. They make fiat currency. They “hoodwinked” Congress into letting them coin money and regulating the value of it.

    They charge the government interest when the government borrows from them.

    They have never been audited.( Read HR 1207 Audit the Fed Bill)

    It's not federal and they have doubtful reserves.

  • George Donnelly . com

    Suit and tie FED Goons who counterfeit money and taxes people then harasses them. This is your public servant or better yet serpent.. Want Freedom? End the FED and the inside 911 ploys will end with them - America your under siege

    Wake up America

  • " 100% of our federal income tax goes to the federal reserve for interest."

    Gerald Ford

  • @brainerdrebel

    Where did you get that quote?...Because that information is wrong.

  • @RetSquid No it is not wrong. I currency is credit based. The Federal Reserve is a private holding company that makes interest every time a dollar is put in circulation.

  • @brainerdrebel

    And your other quote is still wrong. Also the Fed pays the government most of theat interest. Google "federal reserve myths".

  • @RetSquid "The evils of this deluge of paper money are not to be removed until our citizens are generally and radically instructed in their cause and consequences, and silence by their authority the interested clamors and sophistry of speculation, shaving and banking institutions ..... to deliver up our citizens , their property and their labor, passive victims to the swindling tricks of bankers and mountebankers."

    Thomas Jefferson

  • @brainerdrebel

    Nice quote, too bad it has nothing to do with this subject.

  • @RetSquid The quote has everything to do with this subject. Our income tax is unconstitutional and and the Federal Reserve is unconstitutional. Our founders new of the schemes that Bankers use through Central Banking. How does the government prosecute someone when they are not breaking a law? We are silenced by the government authority. There is no income tax law, we voluntarily pay income tax.

  • @brainerdrebel

    1. Income tax is authorized by Article 1 Section 8 Clause 1 of the Constitution.

    2. FRN's are authorized by Article 1, Section 8, Clause 5 and Clasue 18.

    3. Income tax law is in Title 26 and it is NOT 'voluntary'.

  • @RetSquid

    1. Article 1 Section 8 Clause clearly gives Congress, not a private holding company the right to regulate the power to coin Money. ( Silver Certificates )

    2. FRN's didn't exist until 1913, nor did the income tax that accompanies the FRN's

    3. Income Tax has been rules UnConstitutional three times by the US Supreme Court

    4. You are a paid government blogger.

  • @brainerdrebel

    LOL!!

    1. Section 8 gives Congress the ability to declare anything as money, it says nothing about silver certificates.

    2. Income taxs did exist before 1913.

    3. Income tax, in it's current form, has NEVER been ruled unconstitutional.

    4. You are a confused liar.

  • @brainerdrebel

    "The Sixteenth Amendment declares that Congress shall have power to levy and collect taxes on income, 'from whatever source derived' without apportionment among the several states, and without regard to any census or enumeration. It was not the purpose or the effect of that amendment to bring any new subject within the taxing power. CONGRESS ALREADY HAD THE POWER TO TAX ALL INCOMES."

    Bowers, Collector v. Kerbaugh-Empire Co

  • @RetSquid We agree on something, yes, Congress shall have the power, not the Federal (private) Reserve. To tax labor is simply slavery. The IRS and the Federal Reserve are not in our founding documents. Our Federation of States has been over since 1871. I agree special interest controls our government. It is our place as free and sovereign citizens to take our government back. Stop buying foreign imports, and vote for a Constitutionalist not a Politician.

  • @brainerdrebel

    Congress can make anything 'money', including FRNs.

    "To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof."

    1871?

  • @RetSquid February 21, 1871, the year our Federation of States became a Corporation. International Bankers forced Congress to commit treason and form the District of Corruption. Our Federation was essentially bankrupt and financially depleted after The War For Southern Independence.

    I am holding a 5 dollar bill in my hand that JFK put in Circulation in May of 1963, it is a United States Note, he was dead 7 months later, Old Abe tried to Circulate his Green Backs before he was shot. Not FRNs.

  • @brainerdrebel Also remember the federalists won and gave congress the power of taxation in 1787. WE the people and OUR

    Political culture (the real constitution) can demand removal of this Gov. burden.

  • @asicit2b

    If you want to remove this 'burden' you can, but it will take a Constitutional amendment to remove/change Congress's power to tax in Article 1 Section 8.

  • @brainerdrebel

    Creating the District of Columbia didn't change the form of government at all.

  • @RetSquid  WHAT ??????

  • @brainerdrebel

    Do you not understand plain English? The only change in Government was for that 10 square miles alone, nothing else.

  • @RetSquid

    How naive are you?

  • @brainerdrebel

    How gullible are you?

    Clause 17 limits not the power of Congress, but the power of the states. ‘[T]he word “exclusive” was employed to eliminate any possibility that the legislative power of Congress over the District [of Columbia] was to be concurrent with that of the ceding states.’

    District of Columbia v. John R. Thompson Co., 346 U.S. 100, 109, 73 S.Ct. 1007, 1012, 97 L.Ed. 1480 (1953)

  • @brainerdrebel Notice Retsquids copypaste of the 16th.Congress shall have power to "levy" it is lay.Two different functions.Copypaste his post put it in google and see what comes up.

  • @asicit2b

    It will comes up with the case I just posted.

  • @RetSquid Are you someone else sitting in for "Retsquid" ???

    Your response makes no sense. A few too many maybe ?

  • @asicit2b

    I'm sorry if you STILL have trouble with English grammar, not my problem.

  • @asicit2b

    Go through what? Your lack of knowlege about the income tax? Your lack of knowlege about case citations and quotes? Your lack of thruthfullness when you continue to post lies?

  • @RetSquid "I would like have a battle of wits with you, but you appear to be unarmed"

    Where is that from ? I am getting a little tired of your insults.

  • @asicit2b

    It's from the bumper of my first car. Seems to fit you pretty good. Insults? Too bad the truth hurts, huh?

  • @RetSquid My lack of KNOW LEGE ??? THRUTHFULLNESS ????

    ha hAA HHHAAA. Next ??? Do you want to continue ?

  • @asicit2b

    We can continue until you realize that your ideas can never win a case in court or until you stop lying about it.

  • @RetSquid It happens right before your eyes and you still don't get what is going on

    do you ? "I would like have.... knowlege, thruthfullness ? Is there anything wrong

    with these words ? I gave warning about you attacking my grammar and spelling

    which is awful. But that is ALL you can manage to attack.

  • @asicit2b

    You have yet to present a cogent case for your views. Your bad grammar and spelling is just iceing on the cake.

  • @RetSquid Those words are YOURS Read down the post.

  • @asicit2b

    Still no cogent arguments for the case of I'm-not-subject-to-the-income-­tax-because-I-choose-not-to-be­?

  • @RetSquid Naw I goten tirerd of the same thang ova n ova a gain'

    Daw Indavi "dual" iz free to choose whaten he want ta.

  • @asicit2b

    Wrong again/still. All BS, no proof, not even an attempt to prove any of your claims.

    Come on, just ONE attempt at a REAL argument/proof?

  • @RetSquid. What was the Pocaro case about. You have never answered

    that one yet. And your "buddy" bosunbilly wont answer my questions either.

  • @RetSquid. What was the Pocaro case about ????? what is taking you so long.?

  • @RetSquid do daw do dee dee do daw daw du du du du dute do de da da...

  • @RetSquid youwho having trouble ?

  • @RetSquid O.K. I give up, what was the Pocaro case about ?

  • @asicit2b

    Do you have A.D.D. as well as your other mental problems? Do you want me to post the quote again? Oh, I know...Do your own 'due diligence' research.....LOL!!

  • @RetSquid Thats O.K. You have proven my point. I asked what it was about, not to repeat your copypaste and degrade the asker. Thank you.

  • @asicit2b

    You mean that everytime you tell someone to look something up you actually mean it as a degrading comment? I thought that was true, thanks for the confirmation.

  • @RetSquid every time is two words. Thought you would want to know.

  • @RetSquid You make less sense than bosunbilly, he lied about the IRS video

  • @asicit2b

    Like anyone should listen to what you say, you can't even look at a simple phrase like 'every individual' and understand it means every individual....

  • @RetSquid Explain the Pocaro case. Thank you

  • @asicit2b

    Look it up and get back to me, I wouldn't stop you from your 'due diligence'. Find it on Westlaw. "1999 WL 1249329"

  • @RetSquid Nothing specific is coming up under those numbers.Westlaw

    is a sign in site. What did Pacaro do ?

  • @asicit2b

    Would you like me to send you the case? It seems your 'due diligence' has failed. Or you could just pay to see it :)

  • @RetSquid Nevermind you have answered my quest.

  • good on her!!!

  • WTF! This vid is about the fact of the IRS BS--NOT Religion--why does everyone want to drag their damn religious views into everything?? Please stop! Get back to the point here-- that we are being screwed!

  • OK... this was 2006,  ummm... have "they" since then put this "law" into writing? <<< 1/12/2010

  • It's all done by stealth, my friend.

    All those unconstitutional laws on the book are not necessarily enforced...yet. First, you pass the law, implementation comes later and with subtlety. Within a generation, the public believes it was always the law.

  • @911insidejo8

    what 'Unconstitutional' laws are you talking about?

  • John Warner Defense, which nullifies the 5th Amendment.

    You can now be taken oversea, tortured, and tried in a military tribunal.

    That's not freedom and it's happening now. IN AMERICA!

  • @911insidejo8

    Where do you see that information?

  • Khalid Sheik Mohammad has been in indefinite detention and tortured for years in American custody. This should never happen per the US Constitution, Amendments 5, 6, and 8.

    Stop being intellectually lazy by pretending this isn't going on just because you feel like you're free.

  • @911insidejo8

    He was captured overseas and is a illegal enemy combatant and as such he has no claims of Constitutional rights.

    None of them, traditionally, no enemy combatant has ever had Constitutional rights or access to our civilian courts.

    This has nothing to do with " taken oversea, tortured, and tried in a military tribunal."

  • I don't worship him I have a relationship with him. As long as you don't say his name in vein you are not using fowl language. You were told language was foul and you chose to believe it. Like I typed what is it now the 4th or 5th time and you still don't get the hint because you have always liked to be in control even in you personal relationships. He we go, until you get educated you have no grounds, if you want to be educated

  • @ktlee26

    You have no clue about anything, do you?

    You just like to see your words in 'print'.

    The only way to have a relationship with God is to worship Him.

  • @ktlee26

    By the way, it is "vain" not "vein" and "foul' not "fowl".

  • I do not mind getting on the phone with you and going over a few things for you to study and start an understanding. you should study the commercial side of things before you get to the private so you can grasp your mind around it.

  • @ktlee26

    On a phone? With a psyco?

    If you can't post even one bit of proof here what will a phone conversation prove?

  • alright dumb ass, you must use toothpaste with fluoride too thinking that is healthy. LOOK UP YOUR STATE STATUTE!!!!!!! THEN LOOK UP TITLE 26!!!!!! stupid lazy US Slaves always want everything given to them, and worship politicians, completely forgetting they're not even being responsible for their own lives. Take on the FULL Liability instead of Limited Liability. DO I have to type it the 3rd time? There is no point in having a conversation that you are not educated on!

  • @ktlee26

    So, you have ZERO proof of your claims and want me to waste my time trying to prove something for you?

    there is no point in having a conversation with someone like you that has limited cognitive abilities and will follow any crowd that sounds good at the time...talk about SHEEP!! LOL!!

    Prove a point or shut up. :)

  • You have to prove it to yourself, it is not my job to entertain you when I have been helping people get out of their mess, I live in the republic I am not subject to your rules nor do they make me because I know who I am. Only YOU can free yourself, no one else! If you want to remain a slave than that is your problem, not mine. Not a lot will be saved and I have been able to see that now, truly its sad but I hope people wake up and find yahweh

  • @ktlee26

    O.K. so, you make claims that can't be supported, tell someone else to prove your points then claim that God told you to?

  • yahweh will give you a push if you let em. In case you didn't know that's what the Hebrews called God. I don't follow anyone I am guided through yahweh and jesus and my angels...

  • @ktlee26

    You obviously do not worship YHWH.

    It is evident in your behavior, you are a liar.

  • give it up! you apparently do not have a relationship with him. To know yahweh is very loving and has a sense of humor..lol

  • @ktlee26

    Apparently you have been decieved into thinking that whoever you have this'relationship' with is YHWH.

    News Flash, it's not!! While He is very loving and obviously does have a sense of humor (platypus), He accepts only those who worship Him, not those who just want to claim him as some kind of friend.

    Anyways, how about some proof of any of your other B.S.?

  • This is ridiculous! I am acting no better than you with this arguing mumbo jumbo. I am done! Peace be with you and your family

  • @ktlee26

    So you are just a troll, coming by to toss some meaningless comments, hoping for a response, then leaving without even TRYING to prove your original point.

    Goodbye crazy-nut-job-psycho person.

  • No, and they can't make it a law. IRS is a private bank, they make their little IRS laws illegally and unlawfully.

  • @ktlee26

    LOL!!

    The IRS is not a bank, it's part of the Department of the Treasury.

  • LMAO! you are sure smart. Do your history it is not part of the US Treasury however I use to think that too, but I found all the information to completely understand. The IRS holds some Green Backs in case of a currency issue. If a Corporation holds currency what are they? You probably think the Fed Resv is not a foreign bank either and it actually holds reserves.

  • @ktlee26

    The IRS is a department of the Treasury.

    The Federal Reserve is owned soley by U.S. banks.

  • Now I know why the other countries think the US Citizens are stupid.... If you don't know history that put Americans into US Citizenship in the first place than there is no point for a pointless conversation. And if you don't know the law then thats not my problem, its called Brainwash wake up

  • @ktlee26

    You can keep spouting your BS, but know the law.

  • This is the most Patriotic Moment I have had in a long time. I love this woman!

    "Chelle

  • Its about time persons are doing the right thing! There is No Law! There is NO MONEY! This makes me so happy :)

  • I hear you. Just in my own life I am constantly surrounded by self-absorbed pigs who revolve their lives around money and dominating others

    And they'll go through any means to achieve this-lying, slander, fabrication, and such

    I am involved in a personal matter with an instructor that sets a new low as far as professional ethics are concerned. Making up allegations about me, going back to doctor things up, lying...it just doesn't end. All to feel powerful

    And she is becoming the norm.

  • What kind of freedom is that which requires free people to legally pay for anothers dreams, schemes, wants, desires, pleasures, wealth building, failures bailouts & other legal mischief when I cannot force my neighbor to pay for my dreams, schemes...?

    HOW CAN THERE BE LAW OR COURTS OF LAW THAT PERMITS LEGAL STEALING & LEGAL SLAVERY?

    FORGET LEGAL THIEF ARGUMENTS ITS TIME TO BAND TOGETHER. We need unity not legal arguing.

    CAMPAIGNforLIBERTY*COM

    RESTOREtheREPUBLIC*COM

    TRUTHATTACK*ORG

  • Here is the law: Title 26

    Section 1, imposes the tax

    Section 61 defines Gross income

    Section 63 defines Taxable income.

    Section 6012 requires you to file a tax return if you have income of more than the exemption amount, and

    Section 6151 requires you to pay the tax at the time and place fixed for the filing of your return.

  • there is like 4000 pages to Title 26, I suggest you read more,... THERE IS NO LAW, not to mention IRS is foreign to the U.S. Corporation

  • @ktlee26

    There is a law and that last part of your post doe not even make any sense.

    If i show you the law will you shut up?

  • I know the law. lol, why do you think I don't have to pay a mortgage, property tax, and any other tax registration, insurance and all that democracy horse shit? and why is it that I am respected by officers of your law? the officers know the boundaries. you can watch you brainwashing news and remain a parrot

  • Can't put everyone through the court system. That is what we should do, ALL! and I mean all of us, get the balls to withhold your taxes and end this lie.

  • Completely Agree!

  • If EVERYONE knew they were not obliged under law to file tax returns, and EVERYONE didnt... then they are within their legal rights? so ummm, why does the American judicial system prosecute them? Would it be true to say that the American system of 'freedom' enforces laws that don't exist, and that they enforce laws that don't exist with fear, persecution and character assassination? Would anyone call a system that does such a thing a democracy or a dictatorship? Is it a form of terrorism?

  • You have to file income tax returns, it is the law.

    Look up Title 26

  • So why wasn't this law shown to the jury RetSquid, in the above clip, when they asked to see it? If they had have seen the law in black and white then it would have been a no-brainer, the defendant was guilty of not paying tax.

  • Title 26 is federal income tax law,

  • Obviously didnt apply in this court case then or the others were the defendant was acquitted on a technicaluty.. ie NO-ONE could produce the law they were being indicted on.

  • The information in the sidebar says that the income tax is unconstitutional, it's wrong.

  • Constitution was archived shortly after the 1846 treaty via President Lincoln along with the states constitutions. We have been in Martial Law for 150 years, in order to apply executive orders you have to be in a state of emergency thus martial law. There is no congress there is no senate, just the president sense 1846. Don't fear though b/c we are working on it.

  • @ktlee26

    So, how long have you had these delusions?

    You keep stating things as fact that have ZERO facts inn them.

  • I gave you the resources, how can you say it is not the truth if you haven't done the research. June 15th 1846 Treaty with Great Britain.

  • @ktlee26

    And how do you think the Oregon Treaty did what you think it did?

  • And there is state voluntary Statutes as well. Also look up the definition of Income in Blacks Law dictionary

  • @ktlee26

    Title 26 is not voluntary and it does not matter what Blacks says about income, gross income is defined in Title 26.

  • they did look up the Statute and by the way a statute in the law dictionary only applies to a volunteer. They found the Statute did not require him to file, no statute does! And if it were then he can get out with the law dictionary on defining statute. " Your honor as authorized representative on behalf of said trust was not a volunteer, I do not consent, I do not wish to contract, All rights reserved, without prejudice"..lol

  • yea read Title 26 also read your statutes to your state, your comments are arbitrary.

  • @ktlee26

    We're not talking about State income tax, just Federal. Title 26 is the Internal Revenue Code and is the compilation of income tax laws.

    Of course your comments are arbitrary, you have not looked at the law.

  • No, they are not within their legal rights, read Title 26 All of It. However China has a 47 Trillion $ lien on the US Treasury and the taxes went up to help pay the payments on a debt not even ours. US corp is a product of force not law. We have been in a dictatorship/martial law sense 1846, I guess some people are just waking up

  • @ktlee26

    You have got to be high!!

    China has nothing to do with Title 26.

    If we have been under a dictator/martial law, 1) Why do we vote? and 2) Why didn't anyone tell the Military?

    The U.S. is a countrt and a corporation, they are the same and are both a product of the law.

  • One who makes accusations must be the doer. China doesn't have anything to do with Title 26, if you would of read that's the reason why taxes went up. You vote b/c they keep the illusion going, and the Military knows, that is why they are begging for us to hurry up so they can come back to the National Govt. Why do you think Obama is making his own military? But like I said b4 and I say it 1 last time there is no point in this conversation if you don't get it. Your safer following the sheep

  • @ktlee26

    I was in the Navy with a Top Secret clearance and I can say with confidence that you are full of crap as far as artial law goes.

    China has nothing to do with Title 26 being the law.

    When are you going to post any proof for your claims, nutty as they are?

  • @ktlee26

    You said that "they can't make it a law" and that the "IRS is a private bank", so it is up to YOU to provide proof.

    I want to see it, it should be a real laugh.

  • CAN THERE REALLY BE LAW OR COURTS OF LAW THAT PERMITS LEGAL STEALING & LEGAL SLAVERY?

    NO MORE LEGAL THIEF ARGUMENTS ITS TIME TO BAND TOGETHER. We need unity not legal arguing.

    Is freedom that which requires free people to legally pay for anothers dreams, schemes, wants, desires, pleasures, wealth building, failures bailouts & other legal mischief when I cannot force my neighbor to pay for my dreams, schemes...?

    CAMPAIGNforLIBERTY*COM

    RESTOREtheREPUBLIC*COM

    TRUTHATTACK*ORG

  • America Tax payers give around one third of its foreign aid budget to Israel

    Israel's citizens are among the wealthiest in the world,

    50 million plus of US citizens cannot afford basic health care

    Israel's foreign aid allotment is 3.36 billion per year of OUR taxpayer money

    I dont want anymore of my taxes going to Israel what can I do?

  • Yes, lets blame Israel for this one...

  • You are ABSOLUTELY correct my friend, they wage wars with tax money that doesn't belong to them and that people can not afford then brainwash us via the media daily that they are on the peoples sides. Let us face reality here, we are ruled, owned and governed by lying, corrupt, evil, dictatorial, satanic scum wearing a friendly caring mask that couldn't give one flying fuck if u or ur loved ones starve, burn or die, so long as they can extract more cash from you by ANY means.

  • American s and US Citizens are 2 different things. Americans do not pay taxes, they never have, however you have to be a US Citizen and taxes are forced upon you unless you know the voluntary rules and the Foreign tax laws then you can get out of it. And yes sense 1846 we have been tied to the hip with europe and Ireland

  • @ktlee26

    It does not matter if you are a Citizen or not, the laws in the U.S. apply to everyone in the U.S.

    "Americans" could be everyone living in the Western Hemisphere, however U.S. Citizens are Americans by definition.

    Title 26 is not voluntary and it does not cover only foreign income.

  • @ktlee26

    What 1846 treaty are you talking about?

    The Mallarino-Bidlack Treaty?

    The Oregon Treaty?

    The treaty with the Cherokee Nation?

  • folks, there is a higher law than that of man and it tells me that no other man may have sovereignty over my person. many of you gov't lovers will disagree, because you live in fear, and want to exist in the shadow of big brother gov't. i truly pity all of you sheeple who can't seem to grasp the idea of individuality and personal responsibility in this world WITHOUT a tyrannical gov't entity hovering over us all.

  • This is absolute law!, Maxims of Law! It gets no more absolute than that, I have been working on bringing my family back to the republic under yahwehs "God's" law, should be done by this weekend or Monday.

  • "Revenue Laws relate to taxpayers [officers, employees, and elected officials of the Federal Government] and not to non-taxpayers [American Citizens/American Nationals not subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Federal Government]. The latter are without their scope...With them [non-taxpayers] Congress does not assume to deal and they are neither of the subject nor of the object of federal revenue laws." [Economy Plumbing & Heating v. U.S., 470 F2d. 585 (1972)

  • The term "taxpayer" in this opinion is used in the strict or narrow sense contemplated by the Internal Revenue Code and means a person who pays, overpays, or is subject to pay his own personal income tax. (See Section 7701(a) (14) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.) A "nontaxpayer" is a person who does not possess the foregoing requisites of a taxpayer. CLINTWOOD ELKHORN MINING COMPANY,

    GATLIFF COAL COMPANY, and PREMIER ELKHORN COAL COMPANY,

    v. UNITED STATES

  • "The system might not work all the time, but this time, for that man, it did."

  • 15th April 2008 - THATS TOMORROW - Ron Paul Freedom Rally Outside of the White House. Largest US protest in recorded history. Every man, woman and child called for. Bring everyone you can. The Revolution is NOW, the time to say no more is NOW. Tax Day Protest outside of the White House - Show you arent a slave by showing up. Power to the People!!

  • to expand on the explination of the frud read cracking the code..or look at this for a key explanation on how the employer is used as athird party in the fruad to take your money and how to stop it. losthorizons dot com/comment/tax_connections.ht­m

  • since this better go look now HR1955 bill, end free speach but i guess im crazy

  • i'm guessing english isn't your first language?

  • Good for you juror! I think the federal government should pass a law that clears this up. Why not?

  • I guess if you got the stones to go up against those bastards and you have some help you can do it,, one day maybe it will all break out and the people will see it all.

  • this happens in most western like countries .

  • The over all point is most Americans are not legally binded to pay income tax what so ever, and income tax if payed has no positive out come in your daily life its not used pay for any services like construction, transportation etc....... it goes directly into the FEDS pocket like a Christmas bonus a making wealthy people more wealthy

  • Like she said,"It may not work all of the time but it worked for this man". That for a jury that asked"Where is the law?"

  • thank you Massi Brooks for using common sense and speaking out about it!

  • Search: Ron Paul and American Free Press

    Search: American Free Press neo-nazi

  • Since GOD doesn't and cannot LIE, .. WHERE'S this eyewitness

    written EVIDENCE on EACH and EVERY ONE of these tax laws, proving WHO it is that is LIABLE if it AIN'T SO? It says in GOD we trust on our dollars, not lying lawyers & judges!

  • There are reasons for the seperation of church and state. You just gave an example of one.

  • So the government is wrong to print "In God We Trust" on all the money, that also has icons of presidents on it? For all these years, they never put 2 and 2 together and realized that??

  • well it wasnt as if it was the governments choice. that was actually pushed for by a christian group to coin the word In God We Trust.

  • suure, if a christian group pushes for it, the government has nothing to do with it anymore

  • Well of course they voted for it but the one who even suggested putting it was actually a catholic group sorry.

  • bsabruzzo, is there a law requiring americans to pay an income tax?

  • Yes, there is, if you have earned any money, you are required to pay income tax (as I said in a previous post). To do so, you have to calculate and file the forms to verify if you paid too much or not enough (thanks to politicians who made the tax code coplicated). The law is Section 6151 of the code, 26 U.S.C. § 6151, and section 6012(a) of the code, 26 U.S.C. § 6012(a) and you can look it up.

  • How is it that YOU can provide this and no known political, law inforcement, judge, nor IRS commisioner can?

  • Dumb lawyers, stupid politicians, lazy government workers, indiferent jurists and blase cops?

  • howabout a page # please?

  • youtube wont let me post the link. but it falls under title 26 of US code, authorized by the 16th amendment, and subsequent Supreme Court decisions (including ones that russo inaccurately cites) uphold the constitutionality of tax on labor.

  • actually the law goes you only have to pay income tax, only in gain in other lawful activities example, if you make $20,000 a year you cannot be taxed, but if you took and of that 20,000 and flipped let say the stock market and gained like $5000 they can tax you on that.

  • Then there must be something wrong cause i get taxed.

  • there is something wrong which is the point of this video

  • nah

  • paying federal income taxes is voluntary, basically. that money is siphoned through the IRS to the Federal Reserve - which is NOT FEDERAL & NOT A RESERVE - but a PRIVATELY OWNED CORPORATION whose ONLY objective is to MAXIMIZE PROFITS for THEMSELVES. the Fed is owned by a handful of FILTHY RICH BANKSTERS! In fact, one bankster, Rothschild, owns MORE THAN HALF THE WORLD'S WEALTH! he could feed, clothe, & house every man, woman, & child in the entire world! WHY ARE WE GIVING HIM MORE OUR OUR MONEY?

  • you are mistaken. you should read the court case BOWERS v. KERBAUGH-EMPIRE CO. 1926, that russo mistakenly uses. it says specifically that a tax on labor is included, lawful, and constitutional.