Added: 3 years ago
From: cken707
Views: 427,515
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (195)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • It's Ken...... bla bla bla. with gay music.

    This is super low dept 3D.

  • you just got dreamscape'd

  • why the fuck is this song in so many videos

  • WHAT SONG IS IT????? SOUNDS REALLY GOOD!!!!!

  • dosnt feel like 3D

  • doesn't work

  • 427 peoples and me hate this stupid gay music.

  • Your anaglyph sucks dude... sorry :/

  • simply put 'ken....your a cunt!'

  • you have to use two cameras, if you'd like to have real 3D feeling. (eg. you have 2 eyes also XD)

  • Id rather watch my cat taking a dump.

  • Why this song is going on my nervs? Why this song almost in all vidioe? Why this song made? Why?

  • love the matrix, hate the music. Keep making 3D videos. here's a dollar, never play that song again, thank you.

  • thank you motherfucker for give a headache!

  • i agree woth suck dick , but a real 3d movies is one where you would feel for example ant crawling, well feel as if they are crawling on you, i got that felling in avatar with those wolf thingys

  • didn't work

  • This Sucks

  • псевдо. нафига вообще такое создавать?

  • Music fail.

  • que bosta

  • thumbs up if you muted this song!

  • [Comment That Would Get Many Thumbs Up That Relates To This Song Being Either Overplayed Or Not Relaxing To The Human Ear]

  • thats not 3D just a crap picture with red bits. Lets face it 3D is just rubbish !!! That why only crap movies are made in 3D

  • @symanleedsuk not true... play some of the newer games with the new 3d drivers from Nvidia, it's awesome.

  • @symanleedsuk movies in 3D have nothing to do with this. -.-

  • que maça

  • fuck this music ffs

  • fuck that music, seriosuly!!!!

  • The red and blue are spread to far apart fom each other to make it 3d... too much ghosting

  • Dreamscape cancer of youtube ¬¬'

  • Doesn't work and takes too long to get going. Don't make us sit through all that crap at the start. We have lives you know.

  • Crap. Things like this throw a very negative halo for anaglyph work which, however, can be found in 1080p with excellent quality.

  • does not work

  • no 3d no good

  • ha ha, only shifted red cyan color in 2D film. Without 3D effect.

  • sorry try again.........maybe next time you'll get it right

  • people realy don't get it do they?

    YOU CAN NOT GET 3D BY ONLY USING 1 MOVIE AND THEN DOUBLE IT WITH THE COLOR'S OF RED AND CYAN YOU HAVE TO GET 2 MOVIES!!! TWO DIFRENT ANGLES SO YOURE BRAIN GETS ENOUGH INFORMATION for making it 3D

  • so not 3d

  • this is bullshit;p

  • GAY SONG ALERT!!

  • I hate that fucking song, it's so bloody depressing and it's on WAY to many youtube vids!

  • i hate that song

  • more ghosting

  • thats not 3d you're a noob.

  • Doesn't work at all..

  • Wow this doesn't work at all

  • Bullshit

  • it puts the images together but it is not 3d. in order for the 3d to work, you have to have to same clips from 2 different angles and i dont think you have access to that.

  • 3D FAIL

  • so bad

    ç

  • Crappy overused song, not actually 3D. You lose. You get nothing. Good day to you sir.

  • thats not 3d,.. is a 2d movie in red cyan,.. recorded with single camera :|...

  • ooohh the gun is creepy :l

  • It doesn't work and there is way too much ghosting...

  • its a little blurred (with glasses)

  • very bad

  • its not 3d it's still flat

  • what song is this??

  • this song fking irritates me

  • didnt do much for me, maybe its the quality, there are better anaglyph on youtube

  • WARNING WARNING WARNING!! EXTREMLEY ANNOYING MUSIC AHEAD!!

  • Crap. Not 3D, you've just pushed a 2D image back.

  • It's not that bad it is just a little blurry with the glasses on

  • fake! not 3d!

  • i have green not blue : /

  • no 3d effect you dumb ass

  • It's not 3D! The video is just closer, but it's NOT 3D !!!

  • THIS IS FAKE AND GAY

  • @GeniusSoftxD doesnt take a genius to figure that.. oh snap

  • Sorry but what you've done is not 3D.

  • Give up. You're on a looser.

  • This dossent really work. Sorry.

  • i made my own 3d glass, but it wasnt so good, mybe the fire was the only thing that was a little bit 3d for me :S

  • That 3-D wasnt that good.

  • stupid clip

  • that doesnt look 3d

  • visit website watchin3D . tv to see 3D video on your computer !!!

  • This isnt 3d

  • shit

  • this is 2D>3d conversion...crappy one

  • red n blue pictures dont fit to eachother, so bad...

  • cant believe i fell for this, doesnt work

  • Crap + Crap + Crap = 3 D Crap!!

  • is dont the 3D !!! you looser

  • @josstudio

    is dont the english you speaky speaky

  • 3d doesn't work if you just put the same video layer with two colors beneath!

  • I would love to see the Matrix Trilogy in IMAX 3D

  • my 3D glasses dont work ¬¬

  • Move RED around 2mm to the right. Currently no 3D!

  • lol

  • fail..

  • Wow epic fail

  • you want to see something really in 3D? Turn around! =D

  • infinte D

    lolzz

  • have you tried watching your finished sh....product ? watch bmg and umg in 3d !

  • as an object approaches the camera the two channels separate more. Obviously you have taken the 2D film and just offset a red and offset a cyan layer over the original. To pull this of properly would require you do deconstruct each element in the scene and re-assemble in a 3D space, do a shitload of key framing and 3D camera movements and then offset the whole thing. That would take like a good 6hours per second of video to be done quickly.

  • thanks mitch

    how to deconstruct each ealment and re-assemble....give me idea.

  • Are you kidding? your going to try it?

    Ok well you can pull it apart in Photoshop or after effects using masking.

  • It does not work, because he tried to make a 3d clip, out of a single source 2d clip. That isn't possible. All 3d images/real films are made with two separate cameras. not one. The changing of the colors in this clip would never fix it

  • fake..!

  • it aint THREE DEE U BIATCHeee1!

  • i just wanted to say DIE IN HELL

  • @yandykun thats a little harsh, he only made a video wrong, that doesn't mean he needs to burn eternaly in Hell

  • lol it's 3D but only because the whole image is moved back 10cm into the frame. Sorry but it doesn't work like that (I'm guessing you used AE?)

  • How is this 3D? Anyone can duplicate a single image and make this. That's what you did. There is no true depth.

  • does not work.... and to much ghosting

  • @Petitprox

    Less than in minecraft.

  • SHITTY

  • not 3d

  • Shit

  • dude, red and cyan 3d isnt just creating blue and red flat images and then just shifting them, you need different angles

    do some investigating before you waste more peoples time like this

  • FAKE

  • @pipidos2

    jajajajaj this fake XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

    FAKEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!­!!

  • There's no 3D at all, it's just a flat movie with double images.

  • mine green red what diffrence urs cyan red

  • this one is red cyan =)

  • what kind of program did you use to create the movie in 3d?

  • i use after effects but the guy who make the video i think than too.

  • I'm a stereographer and this WILL NOT WORK. You clearly have no idea what you are doing.

  • you can turn 2d to 3d, they're doing it for titanic

  • It is possible. we have to work on each object and (each pixels)

    as you know.. it is Harly possible

  • The only thing that really worked for me was the explosion at the end, which looked AWESOME.

  • What are the TONES of movies that you claim are being made into 3D that were 2D? 2d-3d conversion is possible but it is so expensive and slow that I don't think that any studio has even bothered with it. There are some pictures that have been converted but it took hundreds of man hours for a SINGLE shot. EG Beatles Abby Road 3d poster. But don't claim you tonnes of movies without backing it up!

  • i spent 1 full weak 2 make this.

    i workd on each frame

    EACH FRAME of whole footage.

  • you better use adobe after efects its so simple!!!

  • DONT BE FOOLED, THIS WILL NOT WORK. You cannot turn a 2D movie in 3D

  • thats not true they remade nosferatu in 3D and they're re-editing the original starwars trilogy (and the new one i guess) into 3D.

    you just need a lot of people, who won't get bored rotoscoping - then its a matter of setting the depth of each element thats been masked.

  • let me check star wars .

    i think to work on it.

  • u told me about star wars trilogy few months before, check star trek clip in 3D

  • works a bit but not rly

  • ok i m working for bit more

  • Sorry, this really doesn't work. I've viewed other 3D clips on youtube and they work just fine, so it isn't my glasses.

    I think you need to try again!

  • Don't be fooled - you can't make a 2d movie into a 3d movie.

  • You cant make a 3d movie out of a single 2d shot...simple as that. On occasion you can take adjacent frames under certain circumstances and get a 3d image out of it...and even a whole shot using the pulfrich effect. But you can't take a movie made in 2d and turn it into a 3d movie - its never been done and never will be. If u understand how 3d works you would know that. A full 3d movie has to be shot in 3d. End of story. NO old movie not shot in 3d has ever been made into 3d.

  • not work .. need a better setup for a good effect

  • so how do i get 2 perspectives out of one ?!

  • bullshit

  • yep, it is the best part offcourse,

    thanks for the comment

  • It works when hes shooting

  • It works on my ps3!!!

  • WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEK

  • YOU CAN'T SPEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLLL

  • i was getting a point across ok and im mexican get your facts right pinche puto mal cohida

  • Nope, not working...

  • you cant get a 3d video out of 2d material

  • How?

    Not being rude, legit question

  • which tuns of movies are we talking about here? Name some! Even if computer wiz kids could come up with some kind of pseudo method the cost would be so high why would they do it with old movies first? You may well be thinking of old movies that were actually made in 3D at the time. 3D movies have been around since the 1950's. A true 3d movie requires 2 cameras or a camera with two lenses.

  • Ow....My left eye aches!

  • the reason why there is no efect because the red and green split is the same distance appart with objects infront and behind so when you put glasses on there is no depth at all

  • Low framerate and nasty ghosting effect with my glasses. Out.

  • Cos the red/cyan offset is too great, you need to sit further away from the screen for the effect to work. But great concept otherwise, matrix in 3D would be epic...

  • wish there was 4th Matrix

    called Matrix 4D

  • doesn't work. :/

  • not 3d

  • i agree, there are the sames two videos, not right and left.

  • LIES!

  • this isnt 3D! THIS IS LIES!

  • that was crap

  • more like shit

  • shitfuck i lost my homemade paperglass!

  • matrix should have been shot in 3d

  • lol i only have my 3d glasses colot of GREE AND VIOLET their from this movie called "Journey to the Center of the Earth"

  • thats was pretty good. fuck what people say man keep up the good work.

  • In order to make an actual 3D film the raw footage must be recorded on two cameras set beside each other (to recreate human eyes), and then layered on top of each other (with green/red), you can't just take a regular film and slap a copy of the raw footage slightly over top.

  • It's not in 3D. It's flat; but just set in front of the screen or window. That doesn't make 3D.

  • Yes friend, I agree with it. its more front than depth. yet observe carefully video: from second 49 to 52, set the finger at the point of gun and the last point of sword. a bit distance you feel.

    again, thanks for comment. hope my next reserch will satisfy you. my reserch conti....

  • acctualy its very very hard to convert 2D to 3D...

    you need to edit each individualy layer... to shift the focal in dependency with the distance from camera... in your video its the same distance for all elements...

  • i axactly done what u saying.i axtract each frame , i extract and adjust individual red and cyan layer, i combined. yet its hard to make real 3D, ADJUSTING depth and front at the same time in actual flat video is difficult. but will try for maximum 3D.

    thnaks for the comment.

  • i think it's the best you can get, but it's certainly not perfect. Polorization is the best way do great 3D but it's not really easy to and the glasses aren't readily available to most people. But cool demo, thanks.