THERE ARE TOO MANY QUESTIONS THAT WENT UNANSWERED OVER THE EVENTS OF 9/11. THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT IS PROOF OF THAT AS WELL. NOTHING WRONG WITH THESE QUESTIONS.
I think it's interesting how quickly most of the evidence from the World Trade Center buildings was taken away and destroyed. The entire process perpetrated by the government post-911 has been a blatant cover-up and a long line of lies. I am not exactly sure what they are covering up. But at this point the evidence points me towards believing that the highest probability is that the building were rigged with explosives... most likely planted by Mossad operatives.
@1shabuti1 Sabrosky's "proof" is that HE told others what HE thinks?! "I have had long conversations over the past two weeks with contacts at the Army War College, at it's headquarters, Marine Corps and I made it absolutely clear in both cases that it is 100 percent certain that 9/11 was a Mossad operation. Period." That is worthless! What the hell does it mean that HE told them? He throws around "contacts at the Army War College, at it's headquarters, Marine Corps" YET it's ONLY HIM saying it!
@representativepress You mention about their being no official story. I'm kind of with you on this, but not too sure what you mean exactly, as I have always said there has not been a governmental paper published that specifically says 'this and this happened'
It's little wonder that there are conspiracy theories about 9-11. The White House's behavior afterward was so dishonest and opportunistic that it left a vacuum easily filled with manichean explanations.
The failure of the different branches and levels of the government and of the mainstream press also feed these theories.
@RemoveYourChains and also the games played by the mainstream media contributed to starting the conspiracy crap. Instead of basic journalism of asking "WHY WHAT WHERE WHEN AND WHY" they abnormally fixated on "HOW"
I am arguing that you're misinformed and the job was done by the Israeli army with the help of the banking cartel and their puppets to frame Muslims and thus lead the sheeple into more economic slavery by funding the numerous wars since and stripping us of our feedoms; so did they ever find the secret terrorist underground lair? You know ...the cave?
I am concerned another false flag attack will happen on 9/11 to justify attacking Iran. Please get the word out and do not let this happen. Watch "warbydeception(.)com" to get th efactual truth on 911 - no hype or whacky ct just hard hitting facts.
"Excessive partiality for one foreign nation and excessive dislike of another cause those whom they actuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on the other. Real patriots who may resist the intrigues of the favorite are liable to become suspected and odious, while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people to surrender their interests." -George Washington’s 1796 Farewell Address
Rep Press=major FAILURE on the subject of 9/11. Or cowards. Or worse. So what is it Rep Press? Did you fall for the obvious neocon fairy tale about 9/11? Or are you "professionals"? Useful idiots or controlled opposition? Only 9/11 truth will set us free and only morons and paid scum buy the official story of 9/11 at this point. 9/11 was done by Israelis and American traitors with the aid of a consolidated and corrupt media. Neocons and zionists LOVE the 9/11 lies that you promote. Thats a fact.
it's not just Dan Rather...so if your plan is to just set up a strawman & attack Dan Rather's credibility you're going to have to do a lot more than that
@TheFlexEffect Jumping to conclusions before proving anyone's plans doesn't establish a credible pattern of behavior. You can't conclusively prove any of your channel's points either, so placing the burden of proof on RP is deceptive.
@TheFlexEffect Many have exhibited compelling circumstantial evidence that point to directions similar to yours, & it's wrong that you have to do that, because it's true that there's public information that's obscured & even some that remains undisclosed. But your passionate reaction to those injustices doesn't take away your responsibility to prove what you communicate. The purpose of the press is to connect people; not to divide them.
Sir-I admire your efforts to spread the truth about what's going on.You’re performing an invaluable service in waking people up about the truth of our policies & Israel.However,I can promise u that u haven't yet grasped the whole picture.I would sincerely urge u to watch the utube video War by Deception by Ry Dawson (either of the last 2 cuts).It's a long video,& not professionally done,but it will make all the time you spend getting out the truth even more effective.Plz.Let me know what u think
@representativepress If the blamed dupes were hired to appear to do it, then their motive of the US support for Israel is irrelevant.
--A false flag operation--What is the motive for that? Consider for a moment that possibility?
Hidden in legalese in b&w for everyone to read is that during revolutionary war USA was loaned huge sums of gold by France owed with interest ultimately to King George of England. Subsequently even more money was borrowed.
representativepress I'm subscribed to you and to truther channels. Here's what I believe. 9/11 was an inside job & our goverenment doesn't JUST support Israel. Isreal and our government are run by the same people. The same ones that run the U.N. and Europe. The self proclaimed "elites" that are the bankers in charge of the fed along with the "royal" familes of europe and heads of giant corporations such as monsanto
@adiostraitorobama I suggest you actually read the 9/11 commission report. Look into the Israel and Palestine conflict, look into the decline of the Amero and other unions.
Good points. Self censorship. Redirecting the argument. This is what the main stream media does. People are slowly waking up and realizing it. Not everyone knows how to put it into words ...you know...that suspicious feeling they get. This is why I love your videos. They help me describe what it is that...deep down...we all know the media is doing. Thanks for this video.
Where r the blk bxs, the 911 tapes of the frmenand policemen talking abt the explosions,the security tapes from .nearby businesses...why r so many of the hackers Alice...how did the find a unburned passport.... Any parts of the plane...
I for one would like to know who did 9/11. Bin Laden claimed in Pakistani Ummat interview that he did not do 9/11. But when I read an online bbc article that said, "Bin Laden admits to 9/11", it referenced the same Ummat interview in which he said, he did not!
Some of us still believe in the law, Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat, presumption of innocence. We don't just assume Bin Laden was guilty because it was announced on media within an hour of the attack.
@0urGaia, In interview of girlfriend of Mohamed Atta (9/11 pilot), she said he was heavily into drugs. Further investigations by Daniel Hopsicker hint at a connections between 9/11 and the drug mafia. The taliban had banned the poppy fields one year before 9/11. The invasion of Afghanistan restored the drug industry. The drug mafia profited from the attack. Muslums didn't, they have been slayed in the millions.
If there isn't anything strange going on than explain 2 things: What happened to the black boxes and the ways all the towers fell including WTC 7. Black boxes are nearly indestructable outside of nuclear fallout and have been found at every other plane crash in recorded history and the laws of physics disprove that the towers would fall in that manner from the plane and fire alone without some other force acting on it...
@Darock45 - You won't even find any carpeting in the rubble - there should have been more than 100 acres of this stuff, but it is nowhere to be seen in the videos and photos of the rubble.
Hijackers, planes and victims are the most important ingredients in this operation. If you remove any of those you dont have a basis for the War on Terror and all this other nonsense we are forced to go along with. So expect fierce resistance if you try to prove that they are faked too. + TV=reality.
The Flight 93 flight data recorders were recovered. The Flight 77 black boxes were also removed from the Pentagon, but one of them (the cockpit voice recorder) was too badly damaged to be used. The only boxes not to be recovered were from the World Trade Centre impacts, however that's also the most extreme situation (and if they were caught in the collapse then there's little chance of them surviving).
@TheAntiV That is contrary to much that I have researched except for flight 93 and even that has some other questions to be answered that I have not stated....not to mention that still doesn't respond to how the towers fell against the laws of pyhsics if we are to believe there wasn't some other force acting on any of the 3 buildings
Your sources are obviously flawed then. In every photo and every video, you can see columns far outpacing the collapse of the building. Not only are the columns falling faster than the building but they are also falling faster than the debris cloud which is ALSO falling faster than the building. This proves the buildings fell well below free fall speed. That is, unless the beams had a rocket pointed to the ground.
@TheAntiV Everything you just said proves that the building was imploded aka explosives used on those columns in order for the building to fall how and in the time frame that it did. Not to mention the fact that all the debris that was left at the site was immediately removed without any independing testing to be conducted...the columns werent liquifyed so they could be tested for explosives...only they didnt want those tests conducted...
So if explosives were used why can't you here them in any of the video footage of he building collapsing. Explosives are normally really fucking loud. Also, how can explosives cause the perimeter columns of the towers to buckle inward? It's physically impossible.
No testing was needed. it was pretty fucking obvious to everyone what caused the buildings to collapse. In fact the steel wasn't cleared from the sight until May 2002.
@TheAntiV I have seen footage from the groud around building 7 where you can hear the explosives going off and the building come down soon afterwards. Talk to people in pyrotechnics and they will tell you that it was not only possible but the only fucking way those buildings would IMPLODE the way that they did. If it was just the planes alone the towers would either still be standing to fell over on its side. Only thing left in May 2002 was concrete rubble everything was removed long before
@TheAntiV Fire proofing removed? It would take at least 24hrs to burn off the fire proofing for a building that size...steel columns from the CORE removed?Correct me if Im wrong but the plane hit around the 100th floor no where near the core...the faster the plane goes makes it more likely for the building to fall on its side not IMPLODE down. Steel snapping & explosives don't sound anywhere near the same if you been to a construction site you'd know that
You are wrong. You can see in videos the top of the south tower fall behind the perimeter columns at an angle. The top falls behind the perimeter columns and on the floors. The angle at which it falls pushes the perimeter columns in front of the falling top section outward, giving them distance.
This also proves the building was falling apart and could never topple over as conspiracy theorists imply should have happened.
@TheAntiV No your wrong and your making less and less sense everytime you respond....Tower one fell at 9:50am and tower 2 at 10:29am less then 2 hrs after they were hit by the plane....the angle of the bullshit you talking is 90 degrees past logical....that plane could have snapped every piece of steel on the 100th floor and been on fire the whole time and the building still wouldn't have fallen in the manner and speed that it did...
"that plane could have snapped every piece of steel on the 100th floor and been on fire the whole time and the building still wouldn't have fallen in the manner and speed that it did..."
@Darock45 - Black boxes? Read more at Killtown's Blog.
"the ways all the towers fell"? You got to stop believing everything you see on TV. Its a piece of cake for a Hollywood studio to create such a realty.
You see, the weak top 1/10 of the towers cannot destroy the 10 times stronger 1/10 bottom of the towers. Prove it ... and win €1 000 000. Google Anders Björkman The Heiwa Challenge.
The bigger problem isn't what truthers are saying, but what you hear from common everyday folks about the 'why' we were attacked. The amount of disinfo and political commentary rather than actual reporting on news channels is disturbing. Personally I feel this is deliberate in means to gain support from the masses for what would be unsupportable wars if people were simply told the truth.
@representativepress So you do not believe explosives brought down all 3 WTC towers on 9/11? You believe that it was not an Inside Job,that corrupt elements in our government had anything to do with the attacks?Just wondering..I know there's a lot of disinformation about 9/11 but being there that day,what i saw,heard,felt was definitely EXPLOSIONS,massive ones..
"The enormous gap between what US leaders do in the world and what Americans think their leaders are doing is one of the great propaganda accomplishments of the dominant political mythology ...The real danger we face is not from terrorism, but what is being done under the pretext of fighting it." - Michael Parenti
@best333WillC No explosives were used. "Check out WTC 7"? Really, you're still hinging on WTC 7 eh? 1) it was a progressive collapse initiated by fires that went unfought for 7 hours after having the south facade smashed into it by the collapse of WTC 1. 2) Pray tell, WHY is WTC 7 the "smoking gun"? Why did they have to demolish a building that was less than 18 years old? For what purpose? Then tell me how and who and show the world your paranoid deluded fantasy.
Like they say , you can't prove a Negative . So saying " Rumsfeld wasn't involved" is SILLY and baseless .
A. you don't KNOW if he wasn't involved
B. you don't know if he wasn't involved
C. "" " " "
D. They had means , motive and plans to invade middle east i.e. PNAC , Brzezinski " controlling Eurasia will lead to subordination of Africa " in his book BEFORE 9/11 and despite plans to invade BEFORE , building 7 magically coming down ,Explosions heard in basement and different floors bycops
@franz909 Maybe those explosions were the sound of a collapsing building, steel beams and concrete snapping and cracking. What do you think it sound like when a ten foot thick pillar of steel reinforced concrete with the weight of a 110 story building shears under strain? Also why does WTC7 matter, if it was all some conspiracy why destroy wtc7 at all? You think we couldn't have justified the wars with just the othertwo towers and the pentagon?
lol, hey don't worry, alot of people have no real evidence for things that they believe in. Just keep covering your ears and following the nutcase US gov't did 9/11 herd. Don't forget to "bah bahhh" with the rest of the sheep.
Even Chomsky has admitted no Muslim radicals could have been behind the attack. Everything about 9/11 points to government involvement: the timing, the symmetric collapses, the discovery of sophisticated explosives, the Israeli spy ring, the Norad stand down, the disintegrated flight recorders, the immediate destruction of all evidence, the anthrax attacks, etc. etc.
The only valid motive to stop minding about 9/11 would be that unlike many other US government crimes, it killed a mere 3000...
@ArchNME Where should I start? Why not go to the website of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, or watch the lecture by Dr. David Ray Griffin called "Debunking 9/11 Debunking". For years I was firmly on the other side, but the arguments have convinced me.
@adribon Just pick one thing out and tell me about it. The problem with these sites and videos are they just throw out 500 things and don't prove any of them. Lots of nothing doesn't add up to something. Again just find one really good piece of evidence or what you think is the best argument from those sites or that video and just explain that one to me. Is that so hard?
@ArchNME Well, what to think of the nano-thermite they found in the dust remains of the WTC? What's that doing there? And how come all three buildings came falling down in exactly the same fashion as a controlled demolition (at virtual free fall acceleration, without tipping over)? How could Mohammed Atta's passport have been magically found buried among the Word Trade Center (WTC)'s debris when not a single flight recorder was found? Etc. etc.
@adribon Also, did you know that David Ray Griffon wrote this "ringed by anti-missile batteries, which are programmed to destroy any aircraft entering the Pentagon's airspace"? Now bring up google earth and look at the pentagon, then look at reagan national airport. Look at the scale down in the corner that shows you what the distance is. Then read that David Ray Griffon qoute again. Rinse and repeat until you realise how full of shit that guy is.
I think 'reality' is the only word in the English language that should always be used in quotes so no I really can't agree on that.
Why not run a piece on how much was spent on the investigation? If you have not already. Mainly why would they spend more money on less important trials like Clinton's blowjob? Everything about that day stinks to me. The only people that think the WTC was not blown up by Americans are Americans. Swallow you pride already and start exposing the invaders.
The reason the Pentagon doesn't release all of the footage is because it WAS a missile, and that missile was shot from a carrier belonging to Iraq. The truth is we were under attack, do you think the gov. will tell it's people how vulnerable we were? The fact that homing missiles fired at us cannot be shut down and will hit their target because we don't have the technology to stop them. Think about it.
you are digging in on a side of this issue which you have chosen and pointing at the evils of the 'truth movement' as if it were 'one side'. don't you see the irony in that? i'm saddened that you have become so biased about something which is so critical and i believe you do have something important to say. unfortunately, you've closed your eyes to a big piece of the puzzle. if one person tells you something, you don't necessarily need to listen, but when ten people are saying it....??
@FuckYourHolocost As anyone can see, I haven't removed any comments. I hope people think about why someone would work so hard to try to discredit this channel
@bukon90 and if anything that points AWAY from it Rumsfield knowing about an attack the next day. If he knew about the attack, why the hell not wait a day or two more before holding a press conference about the missing money? How in the world anyone could argue that his press conference indicates he thought 9/11 would happen is beyond me.
Rumsfeld wasn't involved. He's a criminal, but looking at his body language that day as he helped aid medics with the wounded at the Pentagon, he had nothing to do with it.
@katey1dog And yet there are truthers who insist that his press conferance the day before indicates he knew. It makes no sense at all to insist that but they do.
Rumsfeld is a numbers man. He isn't a strategist or a tactician. When he aired his own words about the Pentagons inability to account for the 3 Trillion dollars, it means he was searching for that money and going to search for that money. But all of that ended on September 11, 2001.
@representativepress It was 2.3 trillion, and it's a misrepresentation of the Twoof movement that it had anything to do with 9/11 or that it was "stolen", which is what they're alluding to. It was simply lost in the paperwork and beauracracy the the department of defense was at that time. I'm so sick of twoofers continuously spreading misinformation as fact and then saying "do the research" or "wake up" when it's clear they're the ones walking in dreamland.
@representativepress I abhor the use of the word "truther". The inherent derisiveness in it is meant to be an ad hominem attack on any who disagree with the official version of the events. But in the end, isn't everybody a truther? I mean, except those who were behind it? Don't people on both sides of the coin simply want the truth? I just don't think we've gotten to the bottom of it yet. 10 years of war is the upshot, and it's case closed. Conspiracy? Damn right! Sure wasn't an accident.
@canadianroot "Troofer" is a fit derogatory term. A person who genuinely search for truth, is not only prepared that their current position or theory might turn out to be implausible, she will actively try to find out. A real truthseeker is what I call a(n epistemological) fallibilist, as she believes in everybody's liability to err, including her own. The alternative to this position I call intellectual dishonesty. It is the position of the dogmatist and the Orwellian nationalist.
@RSFO Is it safe to assume that you believe that all those who disagree with the official version of events, whether unpatriotic, intellectually dishonest, or not active truth-seekers, are fit for being derided? Simply because they believe, after having done due diligence, that what has been proffered smells to high heaven? I've actively tried to make the pieces fit, and I'm just not buying what the lamestream media, et al, has trumpeted as fact. Epithets=classic divide and conquer.
@canadianroot Nowhere did we say that the official story was true. Quite the contrary. What there is clear evidence for is that questions about why the 9/11 attacks took place has been systematically suppressed.
But by believing 9/11 was an inside job, you also direct focus away from questions why it happened. What if it really was US foreign policies in Israel, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia in particular that infuriated Arabs and Muslims? It is well known that US policies is hated in the Arab world.
@RSFO I misread you, then. I agree that all points need to be considered. It's so easy, based on one's political leanings, to have things all "figured out". I suppose I did the same, when it first happened. I then gave my head a shake and told myself that all isn't what it seems. It rarely is. Especially when the same thing is being force-fed us on a daily basis. So I did tons of digging. We lay people don't have access to the real evidence, but from what I've seen, it's all a big lie.
@representativepress why would it not make sense? you could say anything the day befor e9/11 and it would be forgotten. If you announced it the day after 9/11 than 9/11 and government corruption would become linked which is not what they wanted.
@representativepress I came across this video just recently you might find interesting Former CIA Asset Turned whistle blower on 911 lies. Her testimony will blow you away. watch?v=EavsvUn7QT8&
@katey1dog Rumsfeld is a psychopath and a trained liar. If his body language proves anything, it most likely would be the opposite of the evident. If there had been an authentic external threat that morning, he would have been hiding in the nuclear bunker deep down under the DoD. Knowing nothing would happen Rumsfeld decided to take the opportunity to play a hero.
@representativepress not a big fan of that argument, but non the less rumsfeld may have had nothing to do with it. any news prioir to to 9/11 would have/was forgotten after 9/11. announcing it after would have added to the story and required an explanation because everyone would have assumed it was linked to terrorism and asked questions. i agree the real issue is americas middle eastern policies and unwavering support for israel.
@Rozienab No cases were ended due to WTC7's collapse. but I want to tell you, it takes a really illogical mind to concoct a motive in adition to the terrorism motive for the day of 9/11 and to invest all this stuff to make up a reason for wahy someone would target WTC7/ the whole things is sad.
Right on representative press. You are exactly right in your criticisms of how 911 was presented in the media and by the government. Those are the important issues here.
Don't bother with the truth movement at all. You'll never change their minds about it, it's what they want to believe. Just like some people want to believe the only reason people criticise America is because they hate freedom.
It's just a distraction from more important issues.
@coinageboy Sorry, small change. My background has Jewish friends, but no Jewish ancestry. Oh well. Also, I haven't used the word 'haters', I think, out here, ever. Hmm...2 for 2 wrong. Not your lucky day, dudesicle...
The buildings were demolished with explosives. Period. The videos show it, the eyewitnesses say it, and the physical evidence proves it. Airplane parts have maintenence serial numbers on all parts for record. It has been ten years and not one serially numbered part has been matched to the tailnumbers of one plane. Social Security records say 100 more people died than on an average day in US on 9/11. The responders have been robbed. We were lied to about the wars the whole time. What a joke.
@IranContraScumDid911 The very first video I uploaded to youtube shows that very much UNLIKE a "controlled demolition" the buildings were undergoing visible structural failures well before the collapses. Truthers go to great lengths to deny the condition of the exterior columns before the collapses. And the airplane parts were there, you are spreading lies.
@representative? I have more than a thousands videos that say you are incorrect. The building had four sides, three and a half were structurally sound, as well as three corners. You are not from an engineering background are you? There are horizontal blast ejections that travel down both buildings as fast as the debris falls through air outside the building, it would seem to me not to take a genius to figure it out, but I guess it does. No the airplane parts have NEVER been serially identified
@aghoranathi how can anyone be so stubborn? I am showing logic. is there something wrong with that? You don't think there is something very wrong with "truthers" thanking Dan Rather of all people for his reporting when the reality is he shit on the public on the day of 9/11.
@representativepress Nah bro, i agree 100% and think that what you say is obvious, i got bored and was tired, sorry about that cynicism. Keep up the good work.
Ad hominem attacks, empty logic, and an undying support for a belief backed by less than zero evidence...being loud, obnoxious, and lacking individual thought does not make any of your claims correct..
PROVE that a missile hit the pentagon
PROVE that WTC7 was brought down by controlled demolition
PROVE that the towers were brought down by controlled demolition
PROVE that the 9/11 hijackers are (or were sept 12) still alive.
@FuckYourHolocost , Israel wasn't behind 9/11, but our "alliance" (i.e. unquestioned support of Israeli extremism) was a motivating factor for the 9/11 hijackers and Al Qaeda in general.
Keep up the good work. People really need to understand what a liability our "alliance" with Israel really is.
As for the dishonest and stupid 9/11 twoof movement, they are worthless. They are so full of hate for this country they are obsessed with believing it attacked itself on 9/11, so they make up "evidence" that they then cite as "proof" and, yes, I'm talking about AE911twoof. There is no point listening to those idiots.
See September Clues dot com. The mainstream media videos were altered. Whether Israel had anything to do with it or not, the point is, like many incidences in the past, it has been used as a pretext to increase support for the Military Industrial Complex war profiteers, take us into more wars, and take away our rights as citizens. "Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it." --George Santayana, 1863-1952, philosopher, poet.
Its not that it was an inside job, its that this was an attack that was 'allowed' to happen with the intent to use it for its propaganda value in the oncoming march to war. The thing about building 7 is that it housed the evidence for the massive internal investigation going on about BILLIONS missing from the Pentagon, which Rumsfeld announced on 9/10/01. Pretty funny coincidence. Luckily I dont believe in coincidence. 9/11 is phonier than a 3 dollar bill, but the narrative HAS been hijacked
how do you deal with actual competent professionals who confirmed a controlled demolition?...ah yes....you don't, you deny and negate to maintain your little world. What you have is called a ''faith''.
@Kitswain59~ Apparently, over 30k (THOUSAND) lost their lives that day. I'd love someone like Mike Adams aka The Health Ranger of NaturalNews . com, who's hugely popular (unlike Alex J) & has an impressive vast following, to compile some place on his site where everyone who lost a family member or loved one that day (or in the days & weeks following but directly attributed to the attacks, excluding soldiers / marines involved in the 2 subsequent wars) can list their full names & place of origin.
@Kitswain59 The Death Master file compiled by the Social Security administration is not a complete listing of deaths in the US - as they have confirmed. It is only a compilation of their records. Usually, a private funeral home reports the dead to the Social Security administration. Because so few bodies were found at the site (most burned), few victims were given private funerals or reported to Social Security. Some victims were registered, but very few.
Such a good video . This is what the "Truth" movement should be about. The Truthers use the MSM myth that the hijackers and the financiers all planned this from dingy caves, and therefore the "official" story is obviously a falsehood. Tuthers fall for these stupid myths and are self deluded in the process.
@MustacheVerra If I found out that an architect or an engineer from that organisation was working for me, I would fire them because they are clearly incompetent and don't know anything about engineering.
@BlacksAreBeautiful ae911.org are a minority group that has never published anything in peer review to explain any of their crackpot theories. They may not have any facts, but it's good to know they can count on idiots spamming their website.
It's sad you're so misinformed about this. Everything points to an inside job. Why else would WTC7 have been DC'ed? How else could most of the physical evidence of crime scene be destroyed so quickly? And your point about the 9/11 truth movement only having 2 global views just goes to show how uninformed or willingly deceitful you are.
@1famekouby nothing points to it. First of all, it doesn't make sense at all to even think that anyone would even want to target WTC7. you guys want to think it makes sense since it collapsed but what in the hell would that accomplish. I never even heard of the building before 9/11. and I made it clear about their mantra of "official story" as if it is either belief in that or rejection of it. Look at my videos about WTC7. Firemen could see the building was in trouble. look at the fireman say it
@representativepress "I never even heard of the building before 9/11" Exactly. Doesn't that tell you something. 24/7 coverage and virtually no footage of WTC 7, that in and of itself arises suspicion.
Some of the tenants of WTC 7 include: the IRS, the CIA, the Department of Defense, and the Secret Service. you can check this on wikipedia. You don't think there MAY have been some potentially damning evidence tucked away in that building? There's your potential motive right there.
@eleutheromaniac I never heard of WTC7 BEFORE 9/11. It was covered plenty on the day of 9/11. The media was waiting for it to collapse because fire officials have evaluated the condition and concluded it was going to collapse. It makes no sense at all to think WTC7 was targeted by anyone. It shows the extreme illogic of the "truthers" to instantly invest another motive beyond terrorism for that day. ridiculous and sad. AND WTC5 had a partial fire-induced collapse. was that a conspiracy too?
He said "I never even heard of the building BEFORE 9/11"... maybe he meants "I never even heard of the building ON 9/11", then your criticism would be correct. Now it's just a staw man.
@representativepress LOL--- " it doesn't make sense at all to even think that anyone would even want to target WTC7. you guys want to think it makes sense since it collapsed but what in the hell would that accomplish "
I believe every word Barry Jennings has described of his day with key points made to understand the time line of his traumas.
Attack-plane into tower, call to move emergency personel EG: B.J.
Makes it back up a floor and goes to look for a way out.
Glances out windows, noticing there are still two towers standing tall as built and designed.
So Mr. RP, please explain the reasoning behind your pathetic line I quoted in my previous comment about WTC7, the strange hands to side and your palms up line, "why would they, it don't make sense"???
So you would be a person living on the east coast [ judging by your accent, is reasonable ] and that you may not be telling the truth if you are a daily news junkie of the area,,, I heard of a few of the tenents and I avoid MSM news on the west coast, vvhat does stating that which I am quoting from you accomplish Mr. RP?
You are keeping the lies that 'it was damaged AFTER any tower fell' nonsense. A ^ ?
we are screwed
gangelone999 2 weeks ago in playlist War Propaganda Against Iran Exposed
explain wtc 7 to me please
Cefuroxx 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A new video, a Promo for my movie "Mansue.com ACT Alien Conspiracy Theory" may shed
some new light on what really happened on 911. Clever camel jockeys or Bad Company?
You decide.
I'm the most censored and hated publisher in Martian Klan controlled America.
Wayne E. Manzo, PhD
wmansue 2 months ago
9/11 victims’ families (TV commercial) asking for our help!!
rememberbuilding7(dot)org/10/
NATGEO SPEWING LIES ABOUT 9/11...
/watch?v=VvXGnbsaRN0
DUMB BLONDE KNOWS 9/11 WAS AN (INSIDE JOB)...
/watch?v=mtlkIfSnyDk
9/11 and JFK (official) TV shows are BS.
/watch?v=LDe0G8es2cE
Nezello 5 months ago
FUCK YOU! ....9/11 = 100% Inside Job and Coverup!
Born2Flesh 5 months ago
THERE ARE TOO MANY QUESTIONS THAT WENT UNANSWERED OVER THE EVENTS OF 9/11. THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT IS PROOF OF THAT AS WELL. NOTHING WRONG WITH THESE QUESTIONS.
ruddip 5 months ago in playlist Building 7 Hit other Buildings
You are such a prick.
SheikhTaqiyyameister 5 months ago
Watch "Bush Family Nazi Connection"
allenfix1 6 months ago in playlist 9/11: What You Don't Know is Killing People
I think it's interesting how quickly most of the evidence from the World Trade Center buildings was taken away and destroyed. The entire process perpetrated by the government post-911 has been a blatant cover-up and a long line of lies. I am not exactly sure what they are covering up. But at this point the evidence points me towards believing that the highest probability is that the building were rigged with explosives... most likely planted by Mossad operatives.
magichandpuppet 6 months ago
@1shabuti1 Sabrosky's "proof" is that HE told others what HE thinks?! "I have had long conversations over the past two weeks with contacts at the Army War College, at it's headquarters, Marine Corps and I made it absolutely clear in both cases that it is 100 percent certain that 9/11 was a Mossad operation. Period." That is worthless! What the hell does it mean that HE told them? He throws around "contacts at the Army War College, at it's headquarters, Marine Corps" YET it's ONLY HIM saying it!
representativepress 6 months ago
@representativepress You mention about their being no official story. I'm kind of with you on this, but not too sure what you mean exactly, as I have always said there has not been a governmental paper published that specifically says 'this and this happened'
Could you please elaborate your point?
markmaxy125 5 months ago
It's little wonder that there are conspiracy theories about 9-11. The White House's behavior afterward was so dishonest and opportunistic that it left a vacuum easily filled with manichean explanations.
The failure of the different branches and levels of the government and of the mainstream press also feed these theories.
RemoveYourChains 6 months ago
@RemoveYourChains and also the games played by the mainstream media contributed to starting the conspiracy crap. Instead of basic journalism of asking "WHY WHAT WHERE WHEN AND WHY" they abnormally fixated on "HOW"
representativepress 6 months ago
When the fuck did Mort Goldman leave family guy and dedicate his life to Isreali/american disinfo campaigns?
cmcgarth1O 6 months ago
the zionist has to much ability to cover it up,i think all the proof is out there,neo-con/zionist collaboration.
ezfla 6 months ago
I am arguing that you're misinformed and the job was done by the Israeli army with the help of the banking cartel and their puppets to frame Muslims and thus lead the sheeple into more economic slavery by funding the numerous wars since and stripping us of our feedoms; so did they ever find the secret terrorist underground lair? You know ...the cave?
GuysCallMeShawna 6 months ago
I am concerned another false flag attack will happen on 9/11 to justify attacking Iran. Please get the word out and do not let this happen. Watch "warbydeception(.)com" to get th efactual truth on 911 - no hype or whacky ct just hard hitting facts.
cuttervielli 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
give it up Tom
this isn't 2002
it's 2011
you know you're lying
I'm not going to talk to you like you believe one thing & I believe another thing
we both believe the same thing, except that you choose to lie about it
why exactly do you choose to lie about it...there are numerous possibilities but I'm not going to speculate
TheFlexEffect 6 months ago
"Excessive partiality for one foreign nation and excessive dislike of another cause those whom they actuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on the other. Real patriots who may resist the intrigues of the favorite are liable to become suspected and odious, while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people to surrender their interests." -George Washington’s 1796 Farewell Address
bradchesney11 6 months ago
@FuckYourHolocost
warbydeceptionDOTcom
cuttervielli 6 months ago
the best Factual documentary on 911- please spread the truth
warbydeceptionDOTcom
cuttervielli 6 months ago
@FuckYourHolocost
warbydeceptiondotcom
cuttervielli 6 months ago
you sound like kyle's cousin kyle from southpark
Mynamesnigel 6 months ago
Rep Press=major FAILURE on the subject of 9/11. Or cowards. Or worse. So what is it Rep Press? Did you fall for the obvious neocon fairy tale about 9/11? Or are you "professionals"? Useful idiots or controlled opposition? Only 9/11 truth will set us free and only morons and paid scum buy the official story of 9/11 at this point. 9/11 was done by Israelis and American traitors with the aid of a consolidated and corrupt media. Neocons and zionists LOVE the 9/11 lies that you promote. Thats a fact.
newjack31622 6 months ago
I'm not a "truther"
but are you a "denier"
TheFlexEffect 6 months ago 8
hey reppress
it's not just Dan Rather...so if your plan is to just set up a strawman & attack Dan Rather's credibility you're going to have to do a lot more than that
TheFlexEffect 6 months ago 3
@TheFlexEffect Jumping to conclusions before proving anyone's plans doesn't establish a credible pattern of behavior. You can't conclusively prove any of your channel's points either, so placing the burden of proof on RP is deceptive.
JoeZaza100 6 months ago
@TheFlexEffect Many have exhibited compelling circumstantial evidence that point to directions similar to yours, & it's wrong that you have to do that, because it's true that there's public information that's obscured & even some that remains undisclosed. But your passionate reaction to those injustices doesn't take away your responsibility to prove what you communicate. The purpose of the press is to connect people; not to divide them.
JoeZaza100 6 months ago
@TheFlexEffect RP investigates, you just jump to conclusions and point. Who would you trust between two parties who respectively do the same?
JoeZaza100 6 months ago
Sir-I admire your efforts to spread the truth about what's going on.You’re performing an invaluable service in waking people up about the truth of our policies & Israel.However,I can promise u that u haven't yet grasped the whole picture.I would sincerely urge u to watch the utube video War by Deception by Ry Dawson (either of the last 2 cuts).It's a long video,& not professionally done,but it will make all the time you spend getting out the truth even more effective.Plz.Let me know what u think
nefigaha 6 months ago in playlist 9/11 Reality
@representativepress
watch?v=dTx5R67slS0
Like I said, it's poor quality, & pretty long, but it is packed with facts.
nefigaha 6 months ago in playlist 9/11 Reality
@representativepress If the blamed dupes were hired to appear to do it, then their motive of the US support for Israel is irrelevant.
--A false flag operation--What is the motive for that? Consider for a moment that possibility?
Hidden in legalese in b&w for everyone to read is that during revolutionary war USA was loaned huge sums of gold by France owed with interest ultimately to King George of England. Subsequently even more money was borrowed.
By law foreign elites/bankers control the USA.
oldspammer 6 months ago
@2:06--WTF? I know of NO ONE who "thanks Dan Rather for reporting on 9/11". Most people I know who're awake don't even watch TV, especially the MSM.
soonerdave01 6 months ago
The mainstream media is owned by Jews.
breezeman199 6 months ago
YEA SUN! Let the Truth be told
canalQuaDuece 6 months ago
representativepress I'm subscribed to you and to truther channels. Here's what I believe. 9/11 was an inside job & our goverenment doesn't JUST support Israel. Isreal and our government are run by the same people. The same ones that run the U.N. and Europe. The self proclaimed "elites" that are the bankers in charge of the fed along with the "royal" familes of europe and heads of giant corporations such as monsanto
VendettaCurse 6 months ago
@VendettaCurse
While there is validity to most of what you say, "inside job" is nonsense.
jx14aby 6 months ago
@adiostraitorobama If you think religion is the fundamental problem then you haven't really looked into the issue.
Alpinex105 6 months ago
@adiostraitorobama I suggest you actually read the 9/11 commission report. Look into the Israel and Palestine conflict, look into the decline of the Amero and other unions.
Alpinex105 6 months ago
@adiostraitorobama Are you serious?
Alpinex105 6 months ago
Great videos. It would be awesome to see a 30 minute series about Iraq and Afghanistan
Alpinex105 6 months ago
9/11 was an inside job.
Vektr1 6 months ago
I enjoy watching your videos keep up the good work. =]
Snipervenomaz 6 months ago
Good points. Self censorship. Redirecting the argument. This is what the main stream media does. People are slowly waking up and realizing it. Not everyone knows how to put it into words ...you know...that suspicious feeling they get. This is why I love your videos. They help me describe what it is that...deep down...we all know the media is doing. Thanks for this video.
cbasallie 6 months ago
Where r the blk bxs, the 911 tapes of the frmenand policemen talking abt the explosions,the security tapes from .nearby businesses...why r so many of the hackers Alice...how did the find a unburned passport.... Any parts of the plane...
rb0397 6 months ago
You're asking too much from Truthers when you ask them to acknowledge the existence of reality.
boredtodelusionFan 6 months ago
@boredtodelusionFan That was so lame, it doesn't even qualify as a pithy ad hominem. Surely you can do better.
canadianroot 6 months ago
Looking forward to your upcoming 911 videos, you've done some great ones debunking "truther" falsity.
iamgoddard 6 months ago
I for one would like to know who did 9/11. Bin Laden claimed in Pakistani Ummat interview that he did not do 9/11. But when I read an online bbc article that said, "Bin Laden admits to 9/11", it referenced the same Ummat interview in which he said, he did not!
Some of us still believe in the law, Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat, presumption of innocence. We don't just assume Bin Laden was guilty because it was announced on media within an hour of the attack.
0urGaia 6 months ago
@0urGaia, In interview of girlfriend of Mohamed Atta (9/11 pilot), she said he was heavily into drugs. Further investigations by Daniel Hopsicker hint at a connections between 9/11 and the drug mafia. The taliban had banned the poppy fields one year before 9/11. The invasion of Afghanistan restored the drug industry. The drug mafia profited from the attack. Muslums didn't, they have been slayed in the millions.
0urGaia 6 months ago
Isreality.
1manmafia 6 months ago
oh the suspense! cant wait.
DecentralizedByGuilt 6 months ago
If there isn't anything strange going on than explain 2 things: What happened to the black boxes and the ways all the towers fell including WTC 7. Black boxes are nearly indestructable outside of nuclear fallout and have been found at every other plane crash in recorded history and the laws of physics disprove that the towers would fall in that manner from the plane and fire alone without some other force acting on it...
Darock45 6 months ago
@Darock45 - You won't even find any carpeting in the rubble - there should have been more than 100 acres of this stuff, but it is nowhere to be seen in the videos and photos of the rubble.
Hijackers, planes and victims are the most important ingredients in this operation. If you remove any of those you dont have a basis for the War on Terror and all this other nonsense we are forced to go along with. So expect fierce resistance if you try to prove that they are faked too. + TV=reality.
elbuggo 6 months ago
@elbuggo You do know that carpeting burns right?
ArchNME 6 months ago
@ArchNME - Carpeting burns under a pile of sand and dust? All of it? Can you show me how that is done without oxygen?
elbuggo 6 months ago
@Darock45
The Flight 93 flight data recorders were recovered. The Flight 77 black boxes were also removed from the Pentagon, but one of them (the cockpit voice recorder) was too badly damaged to be used. The only boxes not to be recovered were from the World Trade Centre impacts, however that's also the most extreme situation (and if they were caught in the collapse then there's little chance of them surviving).
TheAntiV 6 months ago
@TheAntiV That is contrary to much that I have researched except for flight 93 and even that has some other questions to be answered that I have not stated....not to mention that still doesn't respond to how the towers fell against the laws of pyhsics if we are to believe there wasn't some other force acting on any of the 3 buildings
Darock45 6 months ago
@Darock45
Your sources are obviously flawed then. In every photo and every video, you can see columns far outpacing the collapse of the building. Not only are the columns falling faster than the building but they are also falling faster than the debris cloud which is ALSO falling faster than the building. This proves the buildings fell well below free fall speed. That is, unless the beams had a rocket pointed to the ground.
TheAntiV 6 months ago
@TheAntiV Everything you just said proves that the building was imploded aka explosives used on those columns in order for the building to fall how and in the time frame that it did. Not to mention the fact that all the debris that was left at the site was immediately removed without any independing testing to be conducted...the columns werent liquifyed so they could be tested for explosives...only they didnt want those tests conducted...
Darock45 6 months ago
@Darock45
So if explosives were used why can't you here them in any of the video footage of he building collapsing. Explosives are normally really fucking loud. Also, how can explosives cause the perimeter columns of the towers to buckle inward? It's physically impossible.
No testing was needed. it was pretty fucking obvious to everyone what caused the buildings to collapse. In fact the steel wasn't cleared from the sight until May 2002.
TheAntiV 6 months ago
@TheAntiV I have seen footage from the groud around building 7 where you can hear the explosives going off and the building come down soon afterwards. Talk to people in pyrotechnics and they will tell you that it was not only possible but the only fucking way those buildings would IMPLODE the way that they did. If it was just the planes alone the towers would either still be standing to fell over on its side. Only thing left in May 2002 was concrete rubble everything was removed long before
Darock45 6 months ago
@Darock45
The reason why WTC fell was because it was hit with a plane traveling 500 miles an hour and had its fire proofing removed from its trusses.
It also had its steel columns which hold lateral load sheared off its vertical load bearing columns in its core removed by a 767.
And who know these were explosives and not just steel snapping how?
TheAntiV 6 months ago
@TheAntiV Fire proofing removed? It would take at least 24hrs to burn off the fire proofing for a building that size...steel columns from the CORE removed?Correct me if Im wrong but the plane hit around the 100th floor no where near the core...the faster the plane goes makes it more likely for the building to fall on its side not IMPLODE down. Steel snapping & explosives don't sound anywhere near the same if you been to a construction site you'd know that
Darock45 6 months ago
@Darock45
I don't think you understand. Much of the fireproofing was gone BEFORE the planes hit the towers. Below is evidence:
debunking911(dot)com/wtc1sfrm(dot)jpg
Also, look up Faulty Fireproofing Is Reviewed as Factor in Trade Center Collapse by JAMES GLANZ with MICHAEL MOSS.
Here's an excerpt:
"Every March and April when you had these windstorms and the building rocked back and forth, you would still knock some of the fireproofing down."
TheAntiV 6 months ago
@Darock45
You are wrong. You can see in videos the top of the south tower fall behind the perimeter columns at an angle. The top falls behind the perimeter columns and on the floors. The angle at which it falls pushes the perimeter columns in front of the falling top section outward, giving them distance.
This also proves the building was falling apart and could never topple over as conspiracy theorists imply should have happened.
TheAntiV 6 months ago
@TheAntiV No your wrong and your making less and less sense everytime you respond....Tower one fell at 9:50am and tower 2 at 10:29am less then 2 hrs after they were hit by the plane....the angle of the bullshit you talking is 90 degrees past logical....that plane could have snapped every piece of steel on the 100th floor and been on fire the whole time and the building still wouldn't have fallen in the manner and speed that it did...
Darock45 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Darock45
"that plane could have snapped every piece of steel on the 100th floor and been on fire the whole time and the building still wouldn't have fallen in the manner and speed that it did..."
Ummm, according to who?
TheAntiV 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Darock45 - Black boxes? Read more at Killtown's Blog.
"the ways all the towers fell"? You got to stop believing everything you see on TV. Its a piece of cake for a Hollywood studio to create such a realty.
You see, the weak top 1/10 of the towers cannot destroy the 10 times stronger 1/10 bottom of the towers. Prove it ... and win €1 000 000. Google Anders Björkman The Heiwa Challenge.
elbuggo 6 months ago
I have a video that I recorded of controlled demo line it up with the towers enough said check it out
tonymengela 6 months ago
The bigger problem isn't what truthers are saying, but what you hear from common everyday folks about the 'why' we were attacked. The amount of disinfo and political commentary rather than actual reporting on news channels is disturbing. Personally I feel this is deliberate in means to gain support from the masses for what would be unsupportable wars if people were simply told the truth.
Keep up the good work!
sleepyriggles 6 months ago 4
@sleepyriggles thank you
representativepress 6 months ago
@representativepress So you do not believe explosives brought down all 3 WTC towers on 9/11? You believe that it was not an Inside Job,that corrupt elements in our government had anything to do with the attacks?Just wondering..I know there's a lot of disinformation about 9/11 but being there that day,what i saw,heard,felt was definitely EXPLOSIONS,massive ones..
alecboi84 6 months ago
@sleepyriggles
"The enormous gap between what US leaders do in the world and what Americans think their leaders are doing is one of the great propaganda accomplishments of the dominant political mythology ...The real danger we face is not from terrorism, but what is being done under the pretext of fighting it." - Michael Parenti
TheeUnidentified 6 months ago
Sounds like this guy really likes to argue. 9/11 explosives were use. Check out WTC 7
best333WillC 6 months ago
@best333WillC
Correction: Sounds like this guy really likes intellectual honesty (also called scientific honesty). Check out his evidence!
Another good thing would be to read "philosophy of science": Karl Popper, Charles Peirce and others.
RSFO 6 months ago in playlist 9/11 Reality
@best333WillC No explosives were used. "Check out WTC 7"? Really, you're still hinging on WTC 7 eh? 1) it was a progressive collapse initiated by fires that went unfought for 7 hours after having the south facade smashed into it by the collapse of WTC 1. 2) Pray tell, WHY is WTC 7 the "smoking gun"? Why did they have to demolish a building that was less than 18 years old? For what purpose? Then tell me how and who and show the world your paranoid deluded fantasy.
Oz1976 6 months ago
Like they say , you can't prove a Negative . So saying " Rumsfeld wasn't involved" is SILLY and baseless .
A. you don't KNOW if he wasn't involved
B. you don't know if he wasn't involved
C. "" " " "
D. They had means , motive and plans to invade middle east i.e. PNAC , Brzezinski " controlling Eurasia will lead to subordination of Africa " in his book BEFORE 9/11 and despite plans to invade BEFORE , building 7 magically coming down ,Explosions heard in basement and different floors bycops
franz909 7 months ago
@franz909 Maybe those explosions were the sound of a collapsing building, steel beams and concrete snapping and cracking. What do you think it sound like when a ten foot thick pillar of steel reinforced concrete with the weight of a 110 story building shears under strain? Also why does WTC7 matter, if it was all some conspiracy why destroy wtc7 at all? You think we couldn't have justified the wars with just the othertwo towers and the pentagon?
ArchNME 7 months ago
"Yeah focus on thing that are real"EXPLOSIVES BROUGHT DOWN ALL 3 WTC TOWERS ON 9/11.FACTS,FACTS,....SO START THERE WHINING BABY
alecboi84 7 months ago
@alecboi84,
lol, hey don't worry, alot of people have no real evidence for things that they believe in. Just keep covering your ears and following the nutcase US gov't did 9/11 herd. Don't forget to "bah bahhh" with the rest of the sheep.
Yamazon3 7 months ago
Even Chomsky has admitted no Muslim radicals could have been behind the attack. Everything about 9/11 points to government involvement: the timing, the symmetric collapses, the discovery of sophisticated explosives, the Israeli spy ring, the Norad stand down, the disintegrated flight recorders, the immediate destruction of all evidence, the anthrax attacks, etc. etc.
The only valid motive to stop minding about 9/11 would be that unlike many other US government crimes, it killed a mere 3000...
adribon 7 months ago
@adribon Do one solid piece of evidence for anything you just said?
ArchNME 7 months ago
@ArchNME Where should I start? Why not go to the website of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, or watch the lecture by Dr. David Ray Griffin called "Debunking 9/11 Debunking". For years I was firmly on the other side, but the arguments have convinced me.
adribon 7 months ago
@adribon Just pick one thing out and tell me about it. The problem with these sites and videos are they just throw out 500 things and don't prove any of them. Lots of nothing doesn't add up to something. Again just find one really good piece of evidence or what you think is the best argument from those sites or that video and just explain that one to me. Is that so hard?
ArchNME 7 months ago
Comment removed
elbuggo 6 months ago
@elbuggo Are you illiterate or something? Read the comment you just responded to you moron.
ArchNME 6 months ago
@ArchNME - Yes, my post ended up at the wrong place. Quite unusual fortunately. Sorry then.
elbuggo 6 months ago
@ArchNME Well, what to think of the nano-thermite they found in the dust remains of the WTC? What's that doing there? And how come all three buildings came falling down in exactly the same fashion as a controlled demolition (at virtual free fall acceleration, without tipping over)? How could Mohammed Atta's passport have been magically found buried among the Word Trade Center (WTC)'s debris when not a single flight recorder was found? Etc. etc.
adribon 6 months ago
@adribon Also, did you know that David Ray Griffon wrote this "ringed by anti-missile batteries, which are programmed to destroy any aircraft entering the Pentagon's airspace"? Now bring up google earth and look at the pentagon, then look at reagan national airport. Look at the scale down in the corner that shows you what the distance is. Then read that David Ray Griffon qoute again. Rinse and repeat until you realise how full of shit that guy is.
ArchNME 7 months ago
@adribon
Bullshit.
jx14aby 6 months ago
I think 'reality' is the only word in the English language that should always be used in quotes so no I really can't agree on that.
Why not run a piece on how much was spent on the investigation? If you have not already. Mainly why would they spend more money on less important trials like Clinton's blowjob? Everything about that day stinks to me. The only people that think the WTC was not blown up by Americans are Americans. Swallow you pride already and start exposing the invaders.
LastCynicStanding 7 months ago in playlist 9/11 Reality
The reason the Pentagon doesn't release all of the footage is because it WAS a missile, and that missile was shot from a carrier belonging to Iraq. The truth is we were under attack, do you think the gov. will tell it's people how vulnerable we were? The fact that homing missiles fired at us cannot be shut down and will hit their target because we don't have the technology to stop them. Think about it.
warrkrymez 7 months ago
@warrkrymez I don't hink anyone knows what you are talking about.
ArchNME 7 months ago
@ArchNME Yeah, new info tends to warp people's minds, don't it?
warrkrymez 7 months ago
@warrkrymez Actually I mean that reply for ho2cultcha's comment. I totally know all about the Iraqi carrier fleet, lol.
ArchNME 7 months ago
@warrkrymez hey stupid, seeing that there were pieces of plane all over the pentagon's property, I think its pretty obvious there was no missile...
Tomhixs 6 months ago
@Tomhixs hey stoopid, o_O that wasn't in the commission report, the plane disintegrated.
warrkrymez 6 months ago
you are digging in on a side of this issue which you have chosen and pointing at the evils of the 'truth movement' as if it were 'one side'. don't you see the irony in that? i'm saddened that you have become so biased about something which is so critical and i believe you do have something important to say. unfortunately, you've closed your eyes to a big piece of the puzzle. if one person tells you something, you don't necessarily need to listen, but when ten people are saying it....??
ho2cultcha 7 months ago
Brightest beacon of freedom. Where old people are robbed to pay for wars to serve the world elite and millions die without health care.
Textynn 7 months ago
@FuckYourHolocost As anyone can see, I haven't removed any comments. I hope people think about why someone would work so hard to try to discredit this channel
representativepress 7 months ago
donald rumsfield on sept 10 2001 "we cannot account for 3 trillion dollars".
bukon90 7 months ago 13
@bukon90 and if anything that points AWAY from it Rumsfield knowing about an attack the next day. If he knew about the attack, why the hell not wait a day or two more before holding a press conference about the missing money? How in the world anyone could argue that his press conference indicates he thought 9/11 would happen is beyond me.
representativepress 7 months ago
@representativepress
Rumsfeld wasn't involved. He's a criminal, but looking at his body language that day as he helped aid medics with the wounded at the Pentagon, he had nothing to do with it.
katey1dog 7 months ago
@katey1dog And yet there are truthers who insist that his press conferance the day before indicates he knew. It makes no sense at all to insist that but they do.
representativepress 7 months ago
@representativepress
Rumsfeld is a numbers man. He isn't a strategist or a tactician. When he aired his own words about the Pentagons inability to account for the 3 Trillion dollars, it means he was searching for that money and going to search for that money. But all of that ended on September 11, 2001.
katey1dog 7 months ago
@representativepress It was 2.3 trillion, and it's a misrepresentation of the Twoof movement that it had anything to do with 9/11 or that it was "stolen", which is what they're alluding to. It was simply lost in the paperwork and beauracracy the the department of defense was at that time. I'm so sick of twoofers continuously spreading misinformation as fact and then saying "do the research" or "wake up" when it's clear they're the ones walking in dreamland.
Oz1976 6 months ago
@representativepress I abhor the use of the word "truther". The inherent derisiveness in it is meant to be an ad hominem attack on any who disagree with the official version of the events. But in the end, isn't everybody a truther? I mean, except those who were behind it? Don't people on both sides of the coin simply want the truth? I just don't think we've gotten to the bottom of it yet. 10 years of war is the upshot, and it's case closed. Conspiracy? Damn right! Sure wasn't an accident.
canadianroot 6 months ago
@canadianroot "Troofer" is a fit derogatory term. A person who genuinely search for truth, is not only prepared that their current position or theory might turn out to be implausible, she will actively try to find out. A real truthseeker is what I call a(n epistemological) fallibilist, as she believes in everybody's liability to err, including her own. The alternative to this position I call intellectual dishonesty. It is the position of the dogmatist and the Orwellian nationalist.
RSFO 6 months ago
@RSFO Is it safe to assume that you believe that all those who disagree with the official version of events, whether unpatriotic, intellectually dishonest, or not active truth-seekers, are fit for being derided? Simply because they believe, after having done due diligence, that what has been proffered smells to high heaven? I've actively tried to make the pieces fit, and I'm just not buying what the lamestream media, et al, has trumpeted as fact. Epithets=classic divide and conquer.
canadianroot 6 months ago
@canadianroot Nowhere did we say that the official story was true. Quite the contrary. What there is clear evidence for is that questions about why the 9/11 attacks took place has been systematically suppressed.
But by believing 9/11 was an inside job, you also direct focus away from questions why it happened. What if it really was US foreign policies in Israel, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia in particular that infuriated Arabs and Muslims? It is well known that US policies is hated in the Arab world.
RSFO 6 months ago
@RSFO I misread you, then. I agree that all points need to be considered. It's so easy, based on one's political leanings, to have things all "figured out". I suppose I did the same, when it first happened. I then gave my head a shake and told myself that all isn't what it seems. It rarely is. Especially when the same thing is being force-fed us on a daily basis. So I did tons of digging. We lay people don't have access to the real evidence, but from what I've seen, it's all a big lie.
canadianroot 6 months ago
@representativepress why would it not make sense? you could say anything the day befor e9/11 and it would be forgotten. If you announced it the day after 9/11 than 9/11 and government corruption would become linked which is not what they wanted.
qualityrkc 6 months ago
@representativepress I came across this video just recently you might find interesting Former CIA Asset Turned whistle blower on 911 lies. Her testimony will blow you away. watch?v=EavsvUn7QT8&
Squirelbutt 6 months ago
@katey1dog Rumsfeld is a psychopath and a trained liar. If his body language proves anything, it most likely would be the opposite of the evident. If there had been an authentic external threat that morning, he would have been hiding in the nuclear bunker deep down under the DoD. Knowing nothing would happen Rumsfeld decided to take the opportunity to play a hero.
adribon 7 months ago
@representativepress not a big fan of that argument, but non the less rumsfeld may have had nothing to do with it. any news prioir to to 9/11 would have/was forgotten after 9/11. announcing it after would have added to the story and required an explanation because everyone would have assumed it was linked to terrorism and asked questions. i agree the real issue is americas middle eastern policies and unwavering support for israel.
Godvernment 6 months ago
@Rozienab No cases were ended due to WTC7's collapse. but I want to tell you, it takes a really illogical mind to concoct a motive in adition to the terrorism motive for the day of 9/11 and to invest all this stuff to make up a reason for wahy someone would target WTC7/ the whole things is sad.
representativepress 7 months ago
Right on representative press. You are exactly right in your criticisms of how 911 was presented in the media and by the government. Those are the important issues here.
Don't bother with the truth movement at all. You'll never change their minds about it, it's what they want to believe. Just like some people want to believe the only reason people criticise America is because they hate freedom.
It's just a distraction from more important issues.
LuminiferousAether 7 months ago
@coinageboy Sorry, small change. My background has Jewish friends, but no Jewish ancestry. Oh well. Also, I haven't used the word 'haters', I think, out here, ever. Hmm...2 for 2 wrong. Not your lucky day, dudesicle...
TheMercilessEye 7 months ago
The buildings were demolished with explosives. Period. The videos show it, the eyewitnesses say it, and the physical evidence proves it. Airplane parts have maintenence serial numbers on all parts for record. It has been ten years and not one serially numbered part has been matched to the tailnumbers of one plane. Social Security records say 100 more people died than on an average day in US on 9/11. The responders have been robbed. We were lied to about the wars the whole time. What a joke.
IranContraScumDid911 7 months ago
@IranContraScumDid911 The very first video I uploaded to youtube shows that very much UNLIKE a "controlled demolition" the buildings were undergoing visible structural failures well before the collapses. Truthers go to great lengths to deny the condition of the exterior columns before the collapses. And the airplane parts were there, you are spreading lies.
representativepress 7 months ago
@representative? I have more than a thousands videos that say you are incorrect. The building had four sides, three and a half were structurally sound, as well as three corners. You are not from an engineering background are you? There are horizontal blast ejections that travel down both buildings as fast as the debris falls through air outside the building, it would seem to me not to take a genius to figure it out, but I guess it does. No the airplane parts have NEVER been serially identified
IranContraScumDid911 7 months ago
OMG, what a fucking useless video! I am considering unsub.
aghoranathi 7 months ago
@aghoranathi how can anyone be so stubborn? I am showing logic. is there something wrong with that? You don't think there is something very wrong with "truthers" thanking Dan Rather of all people for his reporting when the reality is he shit on the public on the day of 9/11.
representativepress 7 months ago
@representativepress Nah bro, i agree 100% and think that what you say is obvious, i got bored and was tired, sorry about that cynicism. Keep up the good work.
aghoranathi 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I'm looking forward to it.
questionsleadtotruth 7 months ago
@ any moronic 9/11 truther:
Ad hominem attacks, empty logic, and an undying support for a belief backed by less than zero evidence...being loud, obnoxious, and lacking individual thought does not make any of your claims correct..
PROVE that a missile hit the pentagon
PROVE that WTC7 was brought down by controlled demolition
PROVE that the towers were brought down by controlled demolition
PROVE that the 9/11 hijackers are (or were sept 12) still alive.
Tomhixs 7 months ago
@Tomhixs "PROVE that,,,"
Sure can, give me legal subpeana and arresting powers [Federal] and you've got it sputnik.
ISamuelII 7 months ago
@Tomhixs
STFU
architects and engineers for 911 truth
EasternGateGuardian 7 months ago
@FuckYourHolocost , Israel wasn't behind 9/11, but our "alliance" (i.e. unquestioned support of Israeli extremism) was a motivating factor for the 9/11 hijackers and Al Qaeda in general.
ConsDemo 7 months ago in playlist 9/11 Reality
Keep up the good work. People really need to understand what a liability our "alliance" with Israel really is.
As for the dishonest and stupid 9/11 twoof movement, they are worthless. They are so full of hate for this country they are obsessed with believing it attacked itself on 9/11, so they make up "evidence" that they then cite as "proof" and, yes, I'm talking about AE911twoof. There is no point listening to those idiots.
ConsDemo 7 months ago in playlist 9/11 Reality
End your channel.....you suck as a commentator....sorry it is the Truth.....and I am not talking about 9/11 either.
dame2809 7 months ago
BTW, I use to like your channel. Unsubbed. This is total BS, and you are full of it.
Hangshai 7 months ago
See September Clues dot com. The mainstream media videos were altered. Whether Israel had anything to do with it or not, the point is, like many incidences in the past, it has been used as a pretext to increase support for the Military Industrial Complex war profiteers, take us into more wars, and take away our rights as citizens. "Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it." --George Santayana, 1863-1952, philosopher, poet.
73849309378 7 months ago
@73849309378 - it should be septemberclues dot info - not dot com
elbuggo 7 months ago
@elbuggo Thank you! I stand corrected.
73849309378 7 months ago
Its not that it was an inside job, its that this was an attack that was 'allowed' to happen with the intent to use it for its propaganda value in the oncoming march to war. The thing about building 7 is that it housed the evidence for the massive internal investigation going on about BILLIONS missing from the Pentagon, which Rumsfeld announced on 9/10/01. Pretty funny coincidence. Luckily I dont believe in coincidence. 9/11 is phonier than a 3 dollar bill, but the narrative HAS been hijacked
Hangshai 7 months ago
@representativepress
how do you deal with actual competent professionals who confirmed a controlled demolition?...ah yes....you don't, you deny and negate to maintain your little world. What you have is called a ''faith''.
architects and engineers for 911 truth
EasternGateGuardian 7 months ago
Youtube ....hijackers alive. FYI.....9/11 victims were not registered as dead by the Social Security Administration.
Kitswain59 7 months ago
@Kitswain59~ Apparently, over 30k (THOUSAND) lost their lives that day. I'd love someone like Mike Adams aka The Health Ranger of NaturalNews . com, who's hugely popular (unlike Alex J) & has an impressive vast following, to compile some place on his site where everyone who lost a family member or loved one that day (or in the days & weeks following but directly attributed to the attacks, excluding soldiers / marines involved in the 2 subsequent wars) can list their full names & place of origin.
annie46664 7 months ago
@Kitswain59 The Death Master file compiled by the Social Security administration is not a complete listing of deaths in the US - as they have confirmed. It is only a compilation of their records. Usually, a private funeral home reports the dead to the Social Security administration. Because so few bodies were found at the site (most burned), few victims were given private funerals or reported to Social Security. Some victims were registered, but very few.
nocturnezero 7 months ago
@nocturnezero Families would have to report the deaths to receive benefits.
Kitswain59 7 months ago
Former director of the US Army War College exposes who really did 9/11. Youtube.......Alan Sabrosky, US Marine Corps veteran-The Autograph-07-13-2011
Kitswain59 7 months ago
Such a good video . This is what the "Truth" movement should be about. The Truthers use the MSM myth that the hijackers and the financiers all planned this from dingy caves, and therefore the "official" story is obviously a falsehood. Tuthers fall for these stupid myths and are self deluded in the process.
Keep up the fight RP.
ScottishAtheist 7 months ago
@FuckYourHolocost <--- Typical moronic Truther.
ScottishAtheist 7 months ago
911 was a great deception!That's all I can say.
eflip1 7 months ago
when all is said and done - Isreal and Great Brittan will be the brunt of a very angry America. and that is why all the lies and heavy handed crap.
they are trying to destroy the muslim banking system - thats the target,
all this Arab warring crap is all about money - inflation - food -- AKA banking,
911 was MILKED, they profitted at every turn and have since,
the second largest Army in the World *you dumby*
BornPatriot 7 months ago
@FuckYourHolocost Trying to get people to listen to what you have to say by being racist. Nice work FuckYourHolocost.
sargientcupcake 7 months ago
ae911.org
BlacksAreBeautiful 7 months ago
@BlacksAreBeautiful Yea, listen to what these guys have to say. They know what they are talking about.
Here's a preview of their next documentary:
watch?feature=player_embedded&v=yIOC1J44RYw
MustacheVerra 7 months ago
@MustacheVerra If I found out that an architect or an engineer from that organisation was working for me, I would fire them because they are clearly incompetent and don't know anything about engineering.
dangerouslytalented 7 months ago
@dangerouslytalented lol... Yea right!
MustacheVerra 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BlacksAreBeautiful ae911.org are a minority group that has never published anything in peer review to explain any of their crackpot theories. They may not have any facts, but it's good to know they can count on idiots spamming their website.
ScottishAtheist 7 months ago
It's sad you're so misinformed about this. Everything points to an inside job. Why else would WTC7 have been DC'ed? How else could most of the physical evidence of crime scene be destroyed so quickly? And your point about the 9/11 truth movement only having 2 global views just goes to show how uninformed or willingly deceitful you are.
1famekouby 7 months ago
@1famekouby OK, so enlighten us. You know so much that the rest of the world doesn't, so spit it out.
Dave83C 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Dave83C Just listen to these guys. If you don't understand then go watch football.
ae911.org
MustacheVerra 7 months ago 2
@1famekouby nothing points to it. First of all, it doesn't make sense at all to even think that anyone would even want to target WTC7. you guys want to think it makes sense since it collapsed but what in the hell would that accomplish. I never even heard of the building before 9/11. and I made it clear about their mantra of "official story" as if it is either belief in that or rejection of it. Look at my videos about WTC7. Firemen could see the building was in trouble. look at the fireman say it
representativepress 7 months ago
@representativepress "I never even heard of the building before 9/11" Exactly. Doesn't that tell you something. 24/7 coverage and virtually no footage of WTC 7, that in and of itself arises suspicion.
Some of the tenants of WTC 7 include: the IRS, the CIA, the Department of Defense, and the Secret Service. you can check this on wikipedia. You don't think there MAY have been some potentially damning evidence tucked away in that building? There's your potential motive right there.
eleutheromaniac 7 months ago
@eleutheromaniac I never heard of WTC7 BEFORE 9/11. It was covered plenty on the day of 9/11. The media was waiting for it to collapse because fire officials have evaluated the condition and concluded it was going to collapse. It makes no sense at all to think WTC7 was targeted by anyone. It shows the extreme illogic of the "truthers" to instantly invest another motive beyond terrorism for that day. ridiculous and sad. AND WTC5 had a partial fire-induced collapse. was that a conspiracy too?
representativepress 7 months ago
@eleutheromaniac
He said "I never even heard of the building BEFORE 9/11"... maybe he meants "I never even heard of the building ON 9/11", then your criticism would be correct. Now it's just a staw man.
GodOfTheInternets 7 months ago
@representativepress LOL--- " it doesn't make sense at all to even think that anyone would even want to target WTC7. you guys want to think it makes sense since it collapsed but what in the hell would that accomplish "
I believe every word Barry Jennings has described of his day with key points made to understand the time line of his traumas.
Attack-plane into tower, call to move emergency personel EG: B.J.
Arrives to find evacuated offices, in a rush.
Turns to leave, blast under him,,,
ISamuelII 7 months ago
Cont:.
,,, blast under him. [ Barry Jennings]
Makes it back up a floor and goes to look for a way out.
Glances out windows, noticing there are still two towers standing tall as built and designed.
So Mr. RP, please explain the reasoning behind your pathetic line I quoted in my previous comment about WTC7, the strange hands to side and your palms up line, "why would they, it don't make sense"???
Seriously, you write that stuff.
ISamuelII 7 months ago
@representativepress "I never even heard of the building before 9/11"
So you would be a person living on the east coast [ judging by your accent, is reasonable ] and that you may not be telling the truth if you are a daily news junkie of the area,,, I heard of a few of the tenents and I avoid MSM news on the west coast, vvhat does stating that which I am quoting from you accomplish Mr. RP?
You are keeping the lies that 'it was damaged AFTER any tower fell' nonsense. A ^ ?
ISamuelII 7 months ago