Back in 1981, WHO was singing an entirely different tune about harmful effects U might want to check out WHO's funding prior to 2006 Back in 1981 WHO's standards were that the precautionary principle of science should be honored before advancing technology Take a closer look at WHO's 2006 release WHO, as an interenational agency, no longer puts the precautionary principle first of do no harm
Money talks and everything else walks including misleading a public's perception of harm
A report issued in 2006 from the World Health Organization (WHO) found no scientific evidence that RF signals from cell towers cause adverse health effects and made the following points: * Up to five times more of the RF signals from FM radio and television (than from cell towers) are absorbed by the body with no known adverse effects on health in the more than 50 years that radio and TV broadcast stations have been operating.
@theyellowdart084 Yoon Shim Kim 2001 et al: Exposure to Workers to ELF-MF's n Electric Appliances Levels of Personal Exposure to magnetic fields to occupational n non-occupational groups Current Regulations Over 4mG (milliGauss) is unsafe
Indoor: Electrician At Work: 6.4mG Transformer Worker 12.1mG
Medical Computer Operator 4.6mG Subway Driver 3.5mG n those numbers don't even include the total MF they would receive in a 24 hr period of work, home, transporation
I think it was the Univ of Seattle that recently released a report that trees retained some form of a small voltage and that this small voltage could be harvested Makes one wonder where this voltage they are attempting to collect came from in the first place Things are not always as natural as others would like us all to believe
I would like to present this from a different angle. Think about all the possibilities. What is different about the trees on the right? Are they transmitting radio waves or other types of radiation? Perhaps, but first look only on what is there. What's different? What could be causing that effect on those trees, but not the others? The main thing that jumps out at me is the sun; it is above the trees on the right side.
Try shooting this same spot at a different time of day, when the sun is elsewhere. Do you get the same results? Try this with a different camera. Maybe all of these things which you call radiation and energy fields are simply camera effects which you allow your imagination to change into absurd conspiracys. I do not wish to rebuke you, but I implore you to at least consider this possibility and open your eyes to what could be a much less sinister world than you make it out to be.
In 2002 The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC added to it's list that extremely low frequencies (ELF)
magnetic fields were now to be thought of as possible carcinogenic to humans Wireless technologys = ELF's Seems common sense would be pointing us at a factor that not all wireless technologys harm is just from the cell powers n instead the wireless technologies r now at a higher risk of harming the public of creating EM damage to our cells Think about the possibilities
Maybe this explains why I don't get a cell signal when I'm in the woods in the middle of nowhere.... oh wait, shouldn't I actually get perfect cell reception if I'm within 500 feet of any tree then?
Ok......you are definately a kook.....but I got ta hand it to ya......your line "were offensive and creative like handicapped porn" was about the funniest thing Ive read all week!!!!! LOL!!! I have got to give ya pretty mad props for a line like that :)
Try some reseach into fungus and the growth being sped up in humans as well as trees...fungus, lichens, moss & mold. You may also wish pathogens. Dan Burish? spelling of the name.
I have been doing research into that. Seems non thermal wireless technology advancements, harms our DNA causing cell distress in some form to plants, animals, bacteria, and humans. Could be the cause of the fungus/mold/bacteria to speed
diabetes is not caused by electromagnetic rays cancer there is a link, diabetes is on the rise because of our diets and obesity, the use of cornmeal as a cheap sugar/food substitute is a more viable cause of diabeties then mystical cell tree towers, make sure you don't feed your cell tree towers after dark we all saw what happened on gremlins, that wouldn't be good. what does this video even have to do with HAARPS?
B3hr You have no idea what interfers with our glucose levels that can be a cause of diabetes. Please don't pretend that you know exactly and the only reason or a condition like diabetes. EM fields are well known to interfer with our hormone productions. Glucose/insulin is something our bodies produce. If something interfers with that production, then it changes how our protein and cells interact and the cell signals they receive.
That's your shitty camera making those pictures. And cancer? Last time I checked, they debunked that "theory" that cell phone signals can cause cancer. You're one psycho woman
Woah girl get out of there. Cancer and brain damage is a terrible effect of these things! You are in saerious danger. I'd ratghr be living in Iraq than a place such as this.
Buy one of Don Croft's harmonic protectors for protection and begin making orgonite like crazy. If this is for real then we are living in a microwave oven 24/7.
Come to think of it, I've noticed this before off of trees and such in my own area. I just wasn't paying attention.
not to say that we aren't cooking ourselves by sending radiation all across the world... look up "radio wave sickness" the russians knew all about it. our gov't is just covering it up, or else people woud stop buying cell phones and such. i tried to write an article for "Radio wave sickness" on the wiki, and it was deleted because it was too speculative, despite the fact that i wrote the article using proper sources, and proper tone (in that i wasn't claiming it to be fact, just possible)
Most radio waves are harmless and there is no cover up of the ones that will harm you. They teach you to stay the hell away from certain towers in electronics classes and in ham radio licensing. Certain frequencies, have the effect of heating the cells in your body. That can be harmful, especially to your eyes which are more quickly damaged by the heating effect not much different than a microwave. Those frequencies though aren't used for much and areas are fenced for proper distance safety.
See HR 2977. Their is also the fact their are frequencies of extremely low and ultra high that is above and below the human range of conscious hearing but it doesn't mean they don't affect us subconsciously. RF waves maybe. The propagantion of waves , so many leave out of their equations of reply's the fact of magnetic fields. EM energy is well known to harm us.Their is microwave,infrared frequencys that r not See House Resolution HR 2977 n the list of Exotic Weapons.
Something that is important concerning Geomagnetism is the fact that scientists at present understand little with regard to the origins of Earth's magnetic field—that is, the original action or actions that resulted in the creation of a geomagnetic field that has remained active for billions of years.
I do agree with you that HARPAA is an important issue and that our goverment is pursuinga goal of weather based warfare. I feal that the missile defense satellites we want to put up in Poland and Czekoslavakia are most likely HARPAA instillations for further global research and implementation of the Ionosphere, the Magnetosphere (the planet's electromagnetic field), and weather warfare.
LOL. That's a solar flare on the lens caused by the refraction of the sun from the trees. Point any camera upwards at a bright light, with an object in front of it like that, and as the object becomes a sillouhette, the lens will pick up a flare. You can actually make the flares form geometric patters if you hold the camera steady such as perfect hexagons. Ive done this for photo class. There is a tool in photoshop that reproduces this natural effect that is called "flare."
just because you've never seen it doesn't mean that it's not a solar flare on a lens. i would suggest you speak to professional photographers and ask them what they think of your half witted theory.
to me this is either a fake done with computer effects or it is just the result of artifacts cause by the camera chip struggling with lens flare brighter than it expected
I get similar effects if i point my camera at a light bulb then turn it on or somthing like that
from all I know it is very unlikelly that some sort of radiation of the type that cause cancer and the shit would only cause any sort of effect on the image captured by the camera when it was pointing to that direction, what is the model of the camera you use to record such footages?
There are cell towers that are "dressed" to look like trees. All the electronic wiring in your homes, EMF from your computer screens, televisions, microwaves, etc. etc. etc. All of that type of pollution is not good for you. Get/make yourself some orgone :-)
If they have 'transparent' aerosols, why the fuck are they spraying the white ones over my house everyday so obviously?
It doesn't indeed sound possible that there is transparent aerosols and I wouldn't doubt it but, I have never heard of them(untill now) and wonder why they only seem to spray YOU with the invisable ones and why they are not hiding it from the people that are contributing to the argument and showing soled evidence(actual footage of spraying)
It doesn't even appear to respond to that tree only, only that general area. Shit goes funny when you point it at the sun at the right angle.
What I am noticing from ALL your videos is the absence of chemtrails. The sky isn't as blue as it suppose to be, leading me to believe that they might be spraying in that area but, please provide a video of the actual spraying activity that is 'causing' all this....
why would they pay me... if they did, I would be debunking the credible videos, not the ones where they debunk their self.
That have NOTHING to so with chemtrails, the thing people NEED to start worrying about and that chemtrails are a HUGE problem and need to be addressed as CHEMTRAILS... if what you say is true, we need to STOP chemtrails and that will be the solution, so stick to chemtrails video's and spread the word of CHEMTRAILS!
Boy deBUMKR RFID055 you sure get around. I really must
of caught something in my camera for them to send you
out today and make comments on 6 or 7 of my videos.
When a bonafide deBUMKR comes out of the woodwork, well I am so honored. How silly of you to pretend you never heard of transpararent aerosols that they are known to use.
Strange how the static ONLY RESPONDS ON THE TREE.
ut's because your pointing it at the sun... the sun is closer to that tree... there is not one chemtrail in the sky. stop discrediting chemtrails, your are paranoid or have an agenda, fucking lune. its the angle of the camera it has a glass lens.
pass the blunt around, quit hoarding it.
Chavita123 1 year ago
Back in 1981, WHO was singing an entirely different tune about harmful effects U might want to check out WHO's funding prior to 2006 Back in 1981 WHO's standards were that the precautionary principle of science should be honored before advancing technology Take a closer look at WHO's 2006 release WHO, as an interenational agency, no longer puts the precautionary principle first of do no harm
Money talks and everything else walks including misleading a public's perception of harm
dbootsthediva 1 year ago
A report issued in 2006 from the World Health Organization (WHO) found no scientific evidence that RF signals from cell towers cause adverse health effects and made the following points: * Up to five times more of the RF signals from FM radio and television (than from cell towers) are absorbed by the body with no known adverse effects on health in the more than 50 years that radio and TV broadcast stations have been operating.
theyellowdart084 1 year ago
@theyellowdart084 Yoon Shim Kim 2001 et al: Exposure to Workers to ELF-MF's n Electric Appliances Levels of Personal Exposure to magnetic fields to occupational n non-occupational groups Current Regulations Over 4mG (milliGauss) is unsafe
Indoor: Electrician At Work: 6.4mG Transformer Worker 12.1mG
Medical Computer Operator 4.6mG Subway Driver 3.5mG n those numbers don't even include the total MF they would receive in a 24 hr period of work, home, transporation
CAN'T TRUST WHO
dbootsthediva 1 year ago
I think it was the Univ of Seattle that recently released a report that trees retained some form of a small voltage and that this small voltage could be harvested Makes one wonder where this voltage they are attempting to collect came from in the first place Things are not always as natural as others would like us all to believe
dbootsthediva 1 year ago
watch this video to cure your dna
The 144,000 and The Song of Moses (Part 7 of 12)
Joseelico77 2 years ago
I would like to present this from a different angle. Think about all the possibilities. What is different about the trees on the right? Are they transmitting radio waves or other types of radiation? Perhaps, but first look only on what is there. What's different? What could be causing that effect on those trees, but not the others? The main thing that jumps out at me is the sun; it is above the trees on the right side.
thesilverfalcon 2 years ago
Comment removed
thesilverfalcon 2 years ago
(Cont.)
Try shooting this same spot at a different time of day, when the sun is elsewhere. Do you get the same results? Try this with a different camera. Maybe all of these things which you call radiation and energy fields are simply camera effects which you allow your imagination to change into absurd conspiracys. I do not wish to rebuke you, but I implore you to at least consider this possibility and open your eyes to what could be a much less sinister world than you make it out to be.
thesilverfalcon 2 years ago
In 2002 The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC added to it's list that extremely low frequencies (ELF)
magnetic fields were now to be thought of as possible carcinogenic to humans Wireless technologys = ELF's Seems common sense would be pointing us at a factor that not all wireless technologys harm is just from the cell powers n instead the wireless technologies r now at a higher risk of harming the public of creating EM damage to our cells Think about the possibilities
dbootsthediva 2 years ago
Maybe this explains why I don't get a cell signal when I'm in the woods in the middle of nowhere.... oh wait, shouldn't I actually get perfect cell reception if I'm within 500 feet of any tree then?
chewy531 2 years ago 4
Thanks for this valuable information dboots. 5*****
I have posted a video response for your opinion please -I have no clue?!!
tc, dolph
iwasthatdolphin 2 years ago
thank you!
JasePro 2 years ago
please save your self and stop. you have no proof of anything in any of your vids, and most of it doesnt make sense.
JasePro 2 years ago
dbootsthediva 2 years ago
so whats this mean? idk what im talking about? this is me and my friends chanel
JasePro 2 years ago
Ok......you are definately a kook.....but I got ta hand it to ya......your line "were offensive and creative like handicapped porn" was about the funniest thing Ive read all week!!!!! LOL!!! I have got to give ya pretty mad props for a line like that :)
frankensteinmoneymac 2 years ago
Try some reseach into fungus and the growth being sped up in humans as well as trees...fungus, lichens, moss & mold. You may also wish pathogens. Dan Burish? spelling of the name.
DaughterofEarthanSky 2 years ago 3
I have been doing research into that. Seems non thermal wireless technology advancements, harms our DNA causing cell distress in some form to plants, animals, bacteria, and humans. Could be the cause of the fungus/mold/bacteria to speed
up it's growth. Thanks for info
dbootsthediva 2 years ago
Comment removed
cthammett 2 years ago
Comment removed
cthammett 2 years ago
I really hope, that this is sarcasm.. Because if it isn't.. We as a nation are screwed.
evillutionskate 3 years ago
We as a nation are screwed because it is
not sarcasm. Check out your government's website of
DARPA. That government entity is known
to test every single hare brained scheme
that comes their way. Check out the programs of STO, ITO, DSO, etc.
dbootsthediva 3 years ago
Trees cannot become cell towers.
You need a new camera.
Sarahjanam 3 years ago 4
Your government has a program called Wireless
Network after Next of WNaN. In it the program
says EVERY TREE A CELL TOWER (also buildings) And Next refers to anything of theirs
which they have under the category of
Next Generation of science, technology and
devices
dbootsthediva 3 years ago
diabetes is not caused by electromagnetic rays cancer there is a link, diabetes is on the rise because of our diets and obesity, the use of cornmeal as a cheap sugar/food substitute is a more viable cause of diabeties then mystical cell tree towers, make sure you don't feed your cell tree towers after dark we all saw what happened on gremlins, that wouldn't be good. what does this video even have to do with HAARPS?
b3hr 3 years ago 2
dbootsthediva 3 years ago
Google/youtube: "Project Bluebeam"
DownWithTheOwl 3 years ago
I have. Project bluebeam only tells us
a piece of the truth.
dbootsthediva 3 years ago
Of course they are going to debunk the truth
about EM energy so they can make more money
off of wireless. If they told you the truth
you would piss your pants. If it makes money, they
don't care if it harms the populations.
Only in the USA do they rebuke the fact
that EM energy causes cancer. They don't
debunk it in Sweden or other countries who
have done many many studies.
dbootsthediva 3 years ago
That's your shitty camera making those pictures. And cancer? Last time I checked, they debunked that "theory" that cell phone signals can cause cancer. You're one psycho woman
robopirinja 3 years ago
Woah girl get out of there. Cancer and brain damage is a terrible effect of these things! You are in saerious danger. I'd ratghr be living in Iraq than a place such as this.
Sumguy21 3 years ago
Buy one of Don Croft's harmonic protectors for protection and begin making orgonite like crazy. If this is for real then we are living in a microwave oven 24/7.
Come to think of it, I've noticed this before off of trees and such in my own area. I just wasn't paying attention.
Thanks for the heads up!
GaGirlie777 3 years ago
I have heard their are different types of
harmonic protectors. What type are you
referring to? Thanks for viewing the video.
dbootsthediva 3 years ago
Thank you for making the video.
worldwithoutparasites (dot) com
GaGirlie777 3 years ago
Thank you again for your comment, but you
didn't answer my question. What type of
harmonic protector are you referring to?
dbootsthediva 3 years ago
Quick Good observation. Did you also notice
the ability of the sun's rays to stretch
all the way to the ground an also over across the building? They bullying us into only providing info
that they want us to know, and get rid of
any reference to other other conclusions. Wouldn't want the masses considering this
Global Warming effect is actually something
mankind created that has nothing to do
with industrys. I do believe many of our strange syptoms are from radio,MW, n EM waves
dbootsthediva 3 years ago
not to say that we aren't cooking ourselves by sending radiation all across the world... look up "radio wave sickness" the russians knew all about it. our gov't is just covering it up, or else people woud stop buying cell phones and such. i tried to write an article for "Radio wave sickness" on the wiki, and it was deleted because it was too speculative, despite the fact that i wrote the article using proper sources, and proper tone (in that i wasn't claiming it to be fact, just possible)
quickmythril 3 years ago 2
Most radio waves are harmless and there is no cover up of the ones that will harm you. They teach you to stay the hell away from certain towers in electronics classes and in ham radio licensing. Certain frequencies, have the effect of heating the cells in your body. That can be harmful, especially to your eyes which are more quickly damaged by the heating effect not much different than a microwave. Those frequencies though aren't used for much and areas are fenced for proper distance safety.
carnifderome 3 years ago
dbootsthediva 3 years ago
Carni You are leaving out of your facts
concerning ELF and VLF and ULF
dbootsthediva 3 years ago
when the sun is in the shot, that is...
quickmythril 3 years ago 2
i only see distortion when the sun is in the show, funny the sun isn't behind the trees on the left, only the right...the ones that "emit a signal"
quickmythril 3 years ago 3
I found the same interference signal
emerged on the trees that are on the median
separating the four lanes in front of my
home. Thanks for your comments. I also agree we are being subjected to some
form of radio wave sickness. Though I tend to
believe it is more of a EM field making us
ill. Whatever the chemicals of the chemtrails
are being used for, it is creating a
silent genocide around the world.
dbootsthediva 3 years ago
Excellent! Stay strong Dee.
1pat21 4 years ago
Thanks
You too Pat. But thanks to your comment, it
made me relook at this video. Pause it at
18 secs thru 28 seconds. Right on the bottom
in the transparency, is those computer
language characters that is attached to
the energy probably.
dbootsthediva 3 years ago
This branch of study "Paleomagnetism" really
only took off after World War II. So it is
possible TPTB started writting this script of history to fake us out, around the same time
they decided to control the layers of our
atmosphere, of which the end result is to
be able to command at their will to make the atmosphere a magnetic shield dome
to block any missle attack and/or chemical
attack. They are making our atmosphere into also
a weapon.
dbootsthediva 4 years ago
But even though they know little, they have
bullied their theorys inTo the mainstream as
POSITIVE KNOWLEDGE i.e. that we are about to
enter a period of the reversal of Earth's
Magnetic Field, that happens about every
500,000 yrs. Reality is we only know what they tell us,
and they only tell us what they want us to
know.
dbootsthediva 4 years ago
Something that is important concerning Geomagnetism is the fact that scientists at present understand little with regard to the origins of Earth's magnetic field—that is, the original action or actions that resulted in the creation of a geomagnetic field that has remained active for billions of years.
dbootsthediva 4 years ago
I do agree with you that HARPAA is an important issue and that our goverment is pursuinga goal of weather based warfare. I feal that the missile defense satellites we want to put up in Poland and Czekoslavakia are most likely HARPAA instillations for further global research and implementation of the Ionosphere, the Magnetosphere (the planet's electromagnetic field), and weather warfare.
blagnarok 4 years ago
LOL. That's a solar flare on the lens caused by the refraction of the sun from the trees. Point any camera upwards at a bright light, with an object in front of it like that, and as the object becomes a sillouhette, the lens will pick up a flare. You can actually make the flares form geometric patters if you hold the camera steady such as perfect hexagons. Ive done this for photo class. There is a tool in photoshop that reproduces this natural effect that is called "flare."
blagnarok 4 years ago 2
I wish that were true, but this effect has
NEVER EVER HAPPENED IN ANY PREVIOUS PICTURES
WITH CAMERA POINTED UPWARDS. I have a few other pictures of camera pointed across the street, and the trees
on THE MEDIAN, THE FOLIAGE THE SAME EXACT
EFFECT HAPPENED. CAMERA WAS NOT POINTED
UPWARD. It appeared on the small trees
on the median and created an ______I line ontop of the foliage nearer the ground, but did not appear on anything that was not
foliage like the air.
dbootsthediva 4 years ago
just because you've never seen it doesn't mean that it's not a solar flare on a lens. i would suggest you speak to professional photographers and ask them what they think of your half witted theory.
molecularash 4 years ago
to me this is either a fake done with computer effects or it is just the result of artifacts cause by the camera chip struggling with lens flare brighter than it expected
I get similar effects if i point my camera at a light bulb then turn it on or somthing like that
fuckign chat limit
TiagoTiagoT 4 years ago
(continuation)
from all I know it is very unlikelly that some sort of radiation of the type that cause cancer and the shit would only cause any sort of effect on the image captured by the camera when it was pointing to that direction, what is the model of the camera you use to record such footages?
TiagoTiagoT 4 years ago
Spk Tiago
Ever hear the word RADIONUCLIDE?
nuclear physics) A nuclide that exhibits radioactivity
So none of us know what our government is up
to considering all the nanoparticles of metallic silica oxides they are aerosoling and
Xing our skies with.
Electromagnetic Waves, or Ultra low frequecy
(ULF) waves, or Extremely high frequency
(ELF) waves, or a new breed of Ultrasound,
Microwave frequency. Who Knows
dbootsthediva 4 years ago
No fake. No computer effects. Real Life
Truth has become stranger than fiction.
Happened to me again videotaping the median
area in front of my house, sun was still more
to the south, but the effect happened on the
trees planted in th median.
dbootsthediva 4 years ago
There are cell towers that are "dressed" to look like trees. All the electronic wiring in your homes, EMF from your computer screens, televisions, microwaves, etc. etc. etc. All of that type of pollution is not good for you. Get/make yourself some orgone :-)
TBone10C 4 years ago
Yes, I am aware about the fake cell tower
trees. But DARPA of the dept of defense has a program called Wireless Network after Next
(WNAN) and it states, as the video states,
EVERY TREE A CELL TOWER
TOO MANY PEOPLE INCLUDING CHILDREN ARE GETTING
MORE AND MORE CANCERS, INCLUDING BRAIN TUMORS
But EMF from our computers,etc is not as
hazardous as EMF radiating on our trees, ground and homes. And probably use too,
since our bodies are made up of energy.
dbootsthediva 4 years ago
You ever hear of mixing transparent in with the white
and dark matter of the chemical mix? RFID055 you are not very bright are you?
YOU ARE BREATHING IN THE TRANSPARENT AEROSOLS WITH
EVERY BREATH YOU TAKE ALONG WITH THE REST OF THE
WORLD. You are inhaling the evidence of the actual
spraying. Again you seem to have some misconception
that the sole purpose of the chemtrails is just so
your eyes get to watch WHITE GRID PATTERNS EXPAND
INTO FAKE CLOUD FORMS.
dbootsthediva 4 years ago
If they have 'transparent' aerosols, why the fuck are they spraying the white ones over my house everyday so obviously?
It doesn't indeed sound possible that there is transparent aerosols and I wouldn't doubt it but, I have never heard of them(untill now) and wonder why they only seem to spray YOU with the invisable ones and why they are not hiding it from the people that are contributing to the argument and showing soled evidence(actual footage of spraying)
bumr055 4 years ago
It doesn't even appear to respond to that tree only, only that general area. Shit goes funny when you point it at the sun at the right angle.
What I am noticing from ALL your videos is the absence of chemtrails. The sky isn't as blue as it suppose to be, leading me to believe that they might be spraying in that area but, please provide a video of the actual spraying activity that is 'causing' all this....
bumr055 4 years ago
?RFID055 I missed the part where the camera is
actually aimed at the sun in this video.
You seem to have the gift of commenting misleading
information. What I am noticing from all your comments is you
don't have a clue what the chemtrails are made up of. I am noticing the only thing you know it seems is
the word chemtrails, and don't have a clue about
the chemicals of the chemtrails and what they are
being used for other than putting a large white
trail in front of your eyes.
dbootsthediva 4 years ago
why would they pay me... if they did, I would be debunking the credible videos, not the ones where they debunk their self.
That have NOTHING to so with chemtrails, the thing people NEED to start worrying about and that chemtrails are a HUGE problem and need to be addressed as CHEMTRAILS... if what you say is true, we need to STOP chemtrails and that will be the solution, so stick to chemtrails video's and spread the word of CHEMTRAILS!
bumr055 4 years ago
Boy deBUMKR RFID055 you sure get around. I really must
of caught something in my camera for them to send you
out today and make comments on 6 or 7 of my videos.
When a bonafide deBUMKR comes out of the woodwork, well I am so honored. How silly of you to pretend you never heard of transpararent aerosols that they are known to use.
Strange how the static ONLY RESPONDS ON THE TREE.
dbootsthediva 4 years ago
ut's because your pointing it at the sun... the sun is closer to that tree... there is not one chemtrail in the sky. stop discrediting chemtrails, your are paranoid or have an agenda, fucking lune. its the angle of the camera it has a glass lens.
bumr055 4 years ago