Except for Glenn Sacks, everone seem to think a woman should have all the choices, no matter what agreement she entered into . That when it come to a mans right to chose, it somehow does not exist. The "poor little defenseless woman has the right to override a man veto and drag a man into parenthood. The real issue is this , if some court,corrupt as they are, obeys the law and uphold a mans right to chose. Well, that might be the beginning of the end of racket they are running.
Definetly CASE CLOSED, once again, the woman thinks her choices and desires , should over shadow and override a mans rights. The contract was clear, now let me repeat this for all the HARD HEADED WOMEN outhere, a contract is two way, if it goes against you, SO SORRY, but equality means a fair chance ,not a guarantee of always winning. Ladies that EQUAL SIGN has a payside and it is long past time you took your turn on it!!!
Both woman and man are the owners of the embryos, and if a fate is considered for those embryos it must be in agree between two. Although any of them can change their minds and nobody can force anyone to choose a fate for the embryos (autonomy).
wait, why does the man need to nice a warning, it's his right to break up with her, not see her, see who he wants, divorce her, etc etc. Woman have this right and do it all the time, and when a woman break up with a man at the last woman she is never qusiro3ens so why is the man being questioned.
Men have reproductive rights too,our sperm is our property damm it & thats like if I get kidnapped. By a crazy bunch of women,who want to steal my sperm for their own sick desires,isn't that still kidnapping,sodomy & theft of my private property.
Unacceptable. It sucks for her and I'm sure it left her feeling abandoned and hurt. However, she has no right to force him to be the father. Let's reverse the situation. Let's say she did not want a baby with him. Let's say he found a surrogate mother and wanted to implant the embryos in her so he could have the child, receive child support, etc... The shit would hit the fan. Women would be like, "Oh hell no!" That's the double standard.
Except for Glenn Sacks, everone seem to think a woman should have all the choices, no matter what agreement she entered into . That when it come to a mans right to chose, it somehow does not exist. The "poor little defenseless woman has the right to override a man veto and drag a man into parenthood. The real issue is this , if some court,corrupt as they are, obeys the law and uphold a mans right to chose. Well, that might be the beginning of the end of racket they are running.
unclefixer 1 year ago
Definetly CASE CLOSED, once again, the woman thinks her choices and desires , should over shadow and override a mans rights. The contract was clear, now let me repeat this for all the HARD HEADED WOMEN outhere, a contract is two way, if it goes against you, SO SORRY, but equality means a fair chance ,not a guarantee of always winning. Ladies that EQUAL SIGN has a payside and it is long past time you took your turn on it!!!
unclefixer 1 year ago
i love how lawyers find ways of braking consent forms and contracts and prenups so men basicly get taken for a sucker...
themaniusedtob 1 year ago
Comment removed
thestreetdogg 2 years ago
Comment removed
thestreetdogg 2 years ago
Comment removed
thestreetdogg 2 years ago
Comment removed
thestreetdogg 2 years ago
Both woman and man are the owners of the embryos, and if a fate is considered for those embryos it must be in agree between two. Although any of them can change their minds and nobody can force anyone to choose a fate for the embryos (autonomy).
rezasamani 2 years ago
wait, why does the man need to nice a warning, it's his right to break up with her, not see her, see who he wants, divorce her, etc etc. Woman have this right and do it all the time, and when a woman break up with a man at the last woman she is never qusiro3ens so why is the man being questioned.
DoctorNumLuck 2 years ago
what about the man's feelings?
DoctorNumLuck 2 years ago
Another proof of the feminazi enforced double-standard.
Men are evil and women need to be pampered to, against any constitutional or equality logic.
Its simple, there is a reason they signed that agreement. They signed it precisely in case this happened.
It happened, agreement is used. That's it. Case closed.
AlekNovy 2 years ago
Whats an update on this???
timothychizmar 3 years ago
They have a contract and the cunts are talking about her feelings.
ZombieSpunk 3 years ago 7
Men have reproductive rights too,our sperm is our property damm it & thats like if I get kidnapped. By a crazy bunch of women,who want to steal my sperm for their own sick desires,isn't that still kidnapping,sodomy & theft of my private property.
crypter27 3 years ago 9
women believe even sperm is there property they are facist dictating cunts
crh2010 3 years ago 4
so true
crypter27 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@crypter27 you are so right it belongs to us if they take it its stealing
themaniusedtob 1 year ago
Unacceptable. It sucks for her and I'm sure it left her feeling abandoned and hurt. However, she has no right to force him to be the father. Let's reverse the situation. Let's say she did not want a baby with him. Let's say he found a surrogate mother and wanted to implant the embryos in her so he could have the child, receive child support, etc... The shit would hit the fan. Women would be like, "Oh hell no!" That's the double standard.
averagejoesgym71 3 years ago 5
@averagejoesgym71 you are very correct they never care what happens aslong as they get what they want ... not whats best for the children
themaniusedtob 1 year ago