@gooldude3 No reason for confusement, b/c you can see that girl reading out the headline on the petition about suffrage at 1:15, so they would have to be ignorant to the spelling of the word as well.
@gooldude3 well sufferage isn't a word, so it's impossible to get THAT mixed up. they weren't saying suffering, they were saying suffrage, which is completely different
@avenueq14 yeah, that's what i said before, that maybe they dont know that the interviewer guy is talking about "suffrage" they probably think he's talking about "sufferage", but they just dont know if its a word or not.... it makes sense to me, cause some of those women answer the question as though they think its "sufferage"
naw.... just type in man show one. i looked a while ago, im pretty sure they took it all off for copy right infringe. but that one episode inspired it all, id be sure to tell you if i find it!
@lilaznballaz1022 Even she wasn't quite sure, its a political fact, not a linguistic one. It's a term that has been disused for 80 years. You could catch people out on a lot of words today, because people don't read serious books for personal interest anymore, but words like this are specific to a political movement which basically culminated in the early 19th century. I think its generally accepted that everybody should be allowed to vote now, regardless of the terms used to describe it.
@VariedInterest Not to say the state of political and historical awareness today isnt pitiful, it is. More important questions concern the two party political system and how it doesnt represent a true democratic process, and how a corporate polyarchy cant exist with democracy. All of our votes are dubious in this context.
you guys did it wrong... you werent supposed to define the word in anyway but instead see if they didnt know what it meant.....
YourVagIsMine 1 week ago
END THE SUFFRAGE OF WOMEN AND INDIRECTLY THE SUFFERING OF MEN!!!!!!!
Limejello10512 1 year ago
@Limejello10512 PREACHHH!
lilaznballaz1022 1 year ago
@gooldude3 No reason for confusement, b/c you can see that girl reading out the headline on the petition about suffrage at 1:15, so they would have to be ignorant to the spelling of the word as well.
jmsloderb 1 year ago
Edit: confusion
jmsloderb 1 year ago
Edit: 1:05
jmsloderb 1 year ago
@jmsloderb im just saying its a possibility for some of the others
gooldude3 1 year ago
Where is this that there are so many English-speaking Asians?
RageAgainstMachinist 2 years ago
I'm pretty sure they think it's suffErage, not suffrage.....seriously, men....
gooldude3 2 years ago
too bad "sufferage" isn't a word
taco751 2 years ago 2
yeah, but they might not know it....depends on how u say it...
gooldude3 2 years ago
@gooldude3 well sufferage isn't a word, so it's impossible to get THAT mixed up. they weren't saying suffering, they were saying suffrage, which is completely different
avenueq14 1 year ago
@avenueq14 yeah, that's what i said before, that maybe they dont know that the interviewer guy is talking about "suffrage" they probably think he's talking about "sufferage", but they just dont know if its a word or not.... it makes sense to me, cause some of those women answer the question as though they think its "sufferage"
gooldude3 1 year ago
@gooldude3 yea i get what your saying, the video just shows how many uneducated/uninformed people there are
avenueq14 1 year ago
haha KC, that was pretty good, pretty good.. Even got a teacher haha...
SNOWBORED11 3 years ago
WHY would you ask an english teacher?
shwaaaaa 3 years ago
CUZ I CAN SUCKA! you never know man, you NEVVER KNOW!
lilaznballaz1022 3 years ago
hey this was great but do you know where to find the real video from the man Show.
i watched it along time ago and want to show my friend
StedySniper 2 years ago
naw.... just type in man show one. i looked a while ago, im pretty sure they took it all off for copy right infringe. but that one episode inspired it all, id be sure to tell you if i find it!
lilaznballaz1022 2 years ago
@lilaznballaz1022 Even she wasn't quite sure, its a political fact, not a linguistic one. It's a term that has been disused for 80 years. You could catch people out on a lot of words today, because people don't read serious books for personal interest anymore, but words like this are specific to a political movement which basically culminated in the early 19th century. I think its generally accepted that everybody should be allowed to vote now, regardless of the terms used to describe it.
VariedInterest 1 year ago
@VariedInterest Not to say the state of political and historical awareness today isnt pitiful, it is. More important questions concern the two party political system and how it doesnt represent a true democratic process, and how a corporate polyarchy cant exist with democracy. All of our votes are dubious in this context.
VariedInterest 1 year ago