Added: 3 years ago
From: Wulfmeister1
Views: 9,256
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (24)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • wow great recovery with the gear collapsing on takeoff . Nice TA I have the regular Platt D model

  • Hi, please, would u like to tell me where can I get plans or ARF kits exactly like this size ? please some idea ? or tips ?

  • @HerrFredrik

    ESM have launched a Dora 9 now. 

  • drecks fahrwerk aber gut gerettet

  • @zlin226

    Viel danke Zlin!

  • The CI XM I have modelled was a ,TA152C0 R11. An allweather fighter. It was also a testbed for a torpedofighter. It was mostly flown by testpilot Bernhard Marcschel.

    17 prototypes was planned, but only 16 was build.

    It,s possible that two reached an operationel unit

  • @Wulfmeister1 Cool, so you have a DB603L engine with MW50 injection aboard.

    ....better not meeting you in the air (at least not in 15000m) :-)

    Ok, lets see weather or not I can make mine a H1/R31 to survive :-)

    take care.

  • Sorry, but the H had long wings and C had the shorter wing. The H was intented to operate at high altitudes. The C as a Zerstører i lower hights.

    Have read all about The TA152 in the last 35 years, so I guess I have some information about it. Dietmar Harman have an exellent book about the Ta152.

  • @Wulfmeister1 I don't agree that way - but anyway. My sources are the book about Kurt Tank itself and the complete list of planes with serial numbers and versions he has ever build. If you are interrested - Wolfgang Wagner - Bernard & Graefe Verlag.

    BTW: I'm flying the Ta152H version. Since there is not enough detail on my plane, I decided it's a H-0 Rnix :-)

  • still looks more like a dora 9 nice airplane.

  • @youallschallack

    It's a big difference between the Dora and the Ta152

  • @Wulfmeister1 Yea, Long wings, Different tail, ect..

    Great model!

  • sweet plane!

  • you should place a camera inside that cockpit and let it film the whole flight! =D would be awesome!

  • did you ad like some retractable landing gears because when it took off it like twisted, because mine deosn't have retracts

  • very nice i love the whisle sounds as it flew by

  • This more like a Dora-9 as the Ta 152 would have a much longer span and an added fuselage plug at the rear, longer than the one in the D-9

  • Sorry,but you are wrong!

    The C model have short wings. But 50cm more than the D9. The H model had the long wing. And the plug in the fuselage was 50cm as on the D9. But the fin was broader on the TA model.

    The wing was mowed forward on the TA models too.

  • @Wulfmeister1 Sorry, but you are wrong as well :-) The Ta152 C-0 series V6, V7 and V8 had short (dural) wings with 19.5 m² (serial #110006 / 7 and 8) and no pressurized cabin (Variant R11). The Ta152 C-1 series (V13 and V15, (serial #unknown) had the larger (steel)wings, the DB603L engine, middle fuel tank n the wing and no aircharger. These prototypes were ready to fly Dec. 1944 and production should start Jan/Feb. 1945.

    But the Ta152C series was never flow in combats.

  • @tiredlight

    The C and H didn't have steel wings, but steel beams.

  • @tiredlight

    The C and H didn't have steel wings, but steel beams. Only the prototype B had a wing in the middle between H and C

  • @Wulfmeister1 I said middle fuel tank not middle wing section.

    There was only one B-5 prototype ever ( and later three others with unknown R variants V19, V20 and V21).

    As long as you say H and C in general, it makes no sense to have further discussions since all these major variants were modified and it is important to distinguish them by the minor number like H-0, H-1 ,the serial number and the R variant. (R == Ruestsatz, the german word for the devices applied for the specific tasks).

  • @Wulfmeister1 The Ta152-H was build with both, long and short wings!!! Ta152-H0 serial #150001 to 150018 19.5m² / serial #150019 to 150026 23,5m². It was planned to later modify the H0 variant to a C3 variant with a DB 603L engine. Due to the end of the war this never happened. (Source: Focke Wulf Werk Cottbus)

  • It depends which TA 152 you're talikng about

  • Whoa! Nice takeoff, could have been disaster. What went wrong with the 'tracts?

  • The airsylinder pushed the lock to far. Have adjusted it now. Hope it will work better next time!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more