1 - The History Of Our Universe Made Easy (Part 1)

[1000fish1]

1. A set of statements or principles devised to explain a group of facts or phenomena, especially one that has been repeatedly tested or is widely accepted and can be used to make predictions about natural phenomena.

This is the definition of theory see the part where it says predictions yeah that's a fancy word for guess. Just cuz it's widely accepted doesn't mean its fact it means a bunch of people with no life in a lab like it. And the bible has facts next time you doubt it try to read it.

[waperboy]

@1000fish1: You got it a bit mixed up there, mate - the "people in a lab with no life" don't "like it". They look at something, asks how it can be, look some more, work out a theory, and say: "For this theory to be correct, X should result if we do A and B". So they do A and B over and over, get X as a result, publish a paper, and a whole lot of other no-life lab people read and repeat these experiments, get X, and can then state that Yes, if you do A and B, X will result. Try and learn somethin

[manzed]

Now you're asking the right questions! "how did that other two form?" From four 6 dimensional universes of course! And so on - infinitely. My point is, why assuming there is a creator, we have explanations that work without magic? Oh I see your point, you WANT to believe there is a creator, a daddy in the sky, someone who reads your mind etc. Well, i tell you something. I want to believe too, but for me there is not enough evidence. And if there was, i wouldn't have to believe, i would know.

[manzed]

What debate? You kept on saying "No evidence for evolution" and "god is the logical cause for everything". Both statement are ridiculous. If you claim such things you better back it up or you risk people laughing at you. Whenever i called you out you either dodged the question or just ignored it and repeated your claim. Very typical creationist behavior. I suggest reading about Occam's razor, Quantum arrow of time, Quantum Decoherence, Heisenberg uncertainty principle, Anthropic principle

[manzed]

All this - "everything needs a designer, like my watch; it's obviously designed; we can't decent from apes; evolution is just a theory; "etc, etc. - is just intellectual laziness.

We have wikipedia, the whole internet and libraries and and and... And still, many choose to be ignorant or outright stupid not shy to embarrass themselves at any given chance. Why is it already 2011 and there are still people who think it's an "option" to "not believe" in evolution? Pathetic. Educate yourself.

[CrumbLuke]

@manzed I am sure by this you believe me to be ignorant, but humor me.

First, you must realize that in the atheistic debate arguments many unrelated arguments, this is to say, if evolution proves true it does not exclude the existence of God from the realm of possibility, so on so forth.

[CrumbLuke]

@manzed Second, you must concede that evolution is post-observational and meta-philosophical hybrid, based on science. This is to say, sorry if this seam harsh, but is it not science anymore. As eluded to before this complicated by the multiple sub-arguments of the atheistic debate, but boils to a main idea, evolution overstates its own legitimacy. It cannot be observed, it cannot be tested, thus it cannot be a theory; it is a brilliant and well founded thesis, but nothing more.

[manzed]

@CrumbLuke

First: I agree, even if evolution was wrong it wouldn't mean that "goddidit"

Second: The days when religious folks decided what is science and what not are long over - otherwise we would be so fucked. Last time I checked there was only one sound theory for the existence of species and well, sorry, it's observed every day, it can be tested. Also look up "evolutionary algorithms".

Third: If something is "brilliant and a well founded thesis" then it's definitely more than nothing.

[CrumbLuke]

@manzed Concerning the first, I agree.

Concerning the second and third, as I implied previously evolution is a study based on ‘after the fact’ observations, in this way, it is philosophical there is no ‘hard’ evidence only indirect possible implications.

Part (1 of 2)

[manzed]

@CrumbLuke

I'm not saying you HAVE to look at the evidence for evolution - but it would help. Read my lips - no scientific theory without mountains of hard facts to support it. And no, it's not "like walking in a room" and guessing.

Talking about logic - if god created time - at what time he decided to do so? There is ZERO evidence for a magical creation, but TONS of evidence for natural causes. Once people thought Zeus was angry when they heard thunder, now we know better. Right?

[CrumbLuke]

@manzed My point is, there is no relevant evidence, this has been my point, if you would have questions to that affect please ask. As the aforementioned implied and I have already stated, it is irrefutable that evolution does not follow the ‘scientific theory,’ and I have meet few that have tried to argue it does. (Part 1 of 2)

[manzed]

@CrumbLuke

No, there is no such point. You just didn't look at the evidence. "it is irrefutable that evolution does not follow the ‘scientific theory". If you think you have a better theory, publish it, have it peer reviewed, then come back. You get your "knowledge" from creation websites it seems. Or did you do scientific research yourself? Then I would be really interested to hear it. Talk to some biologists, archeologists, or scientists in general if they think evolution is not scientific.

[CrumbLuke]

@manzed First, as for my comments of evolutions deficiencies in regard to it theory status, it is base on the requirements of a scientific theory. Do note that I have discussed this with Bio, Chem and Physics professors at UCD and all have agreed with me. It is not a matter of how much evidence, it is about whether the evidence is subjective and whether the research is objective; evolution has neither trait. (Part 1 or 2)

[manzed]

@CrumbLuke

"Bio, Chem and Physics professors at UCD and all have agreed with me." What is UCD and what exactly you asked them? Denying Evolution is like denying the Holocaust, the only difference is that for there are still billions of witnesses alive, which makes it MUCH more pathetic to deny. If your professors deny evolution or the status of a scientific theory i would recommend get the fuck out of there! Do you have those "Evolution is just another theory" stickers on your textbooks? lol

[CrumbLuke]

@manzed To answer your question is was the legitimacy of its theory status, and before you ask they where atheists.

Though, at this point it is clear you aren’t interested in a debate. It was nice talking to you.

[CrumbLuke]

@manzed (Part 2 of 2) As for your logical point, first, your point is like being a fish and saying humans can exist because they would have to live out of water. Second, I would have you have a point; it is in its very nature hard or impossible to find any evidence of creationism. Though still, there is a fundamental root that suggests the existence of God, which is that it is the most logical explanation for existence.

[manzed]

@CrumbLuke

No, my point is that even genesis 1:3 is illogical - god created time "at the 3rd day" ?? The bible is full of those contradictions, no wonder, ancient people HAD NO CLUE and came up with creative explanations.

No doubt that religion is the basis of cultures and the foundation of science itself. But we went beyond alchemy and astronomy, any attempt to turn back the wheel is just pathetic. "God = most logical explanation". What logic? "i don't get it, that's why it must be god". LOL

[CrumbLuke]

@manzed (Part 2 of 2) Second, where as I believe that time was created and do not see any flaw with that point, Gennises 1:3 it says nothing about time just that now that there is light and darkness there is night and day. Trust me I have read the bible many times, I have not found what you have said to be true. I believe we have come to an impasse…

[CrumbLuke]

@manzed Something I forgot to address was my ‘logical point,’ it is founded on the paradigm that all of science and logic based there being action, reaction, cause and effect. If the universe exists there must be a cause; though if you found the root of that change then what caused that change? You have to say that something, not only, outside of our universe, but outside of our plane of existence must have been the point of origin or you are left running in circles…

[manzed]

@CrumbLuke

This is not getting anywhere, you say, "it's logical, it has to be designed, has to have a cause", yet you can't provide proof for that hypothesis. I'll give you an example how the universe got here without being "created".

Think of 2 soap bubbles, which are 3 dimensional objects. The moment they intersect another body appears "out of nothing" - a 2 dimensional disc. It's not hard to imagine that our 4th dimensional universe is the result of 2 intersecting 5 dimensional universes.

[CrumbLuke]

@manzed I do understand your point, I just do not agree. Have a nice life, and I hope that we both know which ever one of us is right someday.

For clarification, now that you found a way to make universes, how did that other two form? That was my point, it is a rhetorical question, I just wanted to make sure you knew what I was trying to say.

[CrumbLuke]

@manzed Part (2 of 2) It’s like walking is a room seeing cookies one the floor and stating “it must have be my kid…” when it may have been logical, it is no more valid than any other possible explanation. In other words, I am not saying that you have to believe in God, I am just stating that you are not being as scientific as you are claiming.

[lamagooster]

Lies all lies don't believe this rubbish it's Lieeeeeeeeeeeeeees well actuals some of it's true asept the part about no god and atheist stuff god made every thing

[PharohKingYugi2010]

what was before the universe and how or what created it and what created the thing that made the univers and how was the first person on earth

because if the first person was on earth how did he or she populate the earth?

basically

was the universe and the cells made from pixie dust?

[mikstar890]

@PharohKingYugi2010 How about u watch the rest of the serie's?

Its explained in a lot of detail.

[PharohKingYugi2010]

@mikstar890 no thanks ill end up with more questions then answers

[FreakyFatBastard]

@PharohKingYugi2010 Knowing what was before the universe is impossible without going the millions of lightyears to point zero, aka the big bang. and even then I don't think it would be possible to see past point zero. so I guess that remains a mystery. The first human on the other hand was evolved from apes. So after evolving from apes to looking more and more human, populating different regions of the world creating different looking humans depending on climate and such. And no..no pixie dust.

[PharohKingYugi2010]

@FreakyFatBastard well pretend the universe is a balloon and everything inside the balloon was created but wat created the balloon aka the universe we do not know

and evolution i dont believe that for one second because what created cells and energy

im the kinda guy who keeps asking questions abt the universe

[FreakyFatBastard]

@PharohKingYugi2010 Well if nothing created the universe, then it would be impossible to find proof of something that is not there. If the universe was created, unless the creator left a note saying "he did it" the same issue would come. Proof of a creator/no creator is close to impossible. We can only guess, or religion can guess, science asks and tries to find the answer by checking the facts. You don't have to believe in evolution. But the facts and info we have seem to support that theory

[PharohKingYugi2010]

@FreakyFatBastard well i wudnt believe scientist anytime soon because some scientist dont know what pH in the pH scale means

[oopscanada]

@FreakyFatBastard Actually, there are facts, and there are facts. Theories are just that theories, even if they "seem" to fit. What's not a fact, is that man descended from apes. That's not a fact, that's actually a theory. A nice fantastic theory, you can teach that to kids; but more mature people, after knowing what we know about cells, the genome, the DNA, the molecules, it's hard to believe something so fantastic. You need an "external|" entity to bring all this together, to get it done

[FreakyFatBastard]

@oopscanada well then explaine what you know about the molecular process, how dna works etc? Yeah sure humans coming from apes is a theory, but the gap in that theory it so much smaller than the huuge gap in religion? Atleast we can watch a primate, and see how extremely close they are to us in dna,body shape, in how we both learn and adapt. I know that you will never just see these facts and think " omg, I now reject religion" but if you'd actually study it..I think you would see my point

[oopscanada]

@FreakyFatBastard Actually, the gap is, well, HUGE, when it comes to apes and human intelligence. Of course, they are smart creatures; just like dogs, cats, dolphins. Hey, even Ants, can show you how to save provisions for Winter. When you really study the molecular process, and how DNA works, there is nothing but amazement as to how everything is "designed" to work properly. I am still yet to see something that came out of nothing; everything has a beginning. Even life.

[FreakyFatBastard]

@PharohKingYugi2010 And I know atheist use this a lot, but the Occam's razor "theory" comes to mind every time I talk about this.

[PharohKingYugi2010]

@FreakyFatBastard explain the Occam`s Razor theory i havent heard that before

[FreakyFatBastard]

@PharohKingYugi2010 Occam's razor is the thought of the simplest explanation being the most likely to be true. That the theory with fewest assumptions, and that has facts based proof is probably the right one. no this is not science, it's logic thinking at its best. Like: why create the assumption that a higher being started it all, when physics/science can point you to a solid truth, not based on an idea but by actually checking out the world, and universe. it's not who created,but how.

[PharohKingYugi2010]

@FreakyFatBastard oh kool

[CrumbLuke]

@FreakyFatBastard I like you point, but I disagree…

I think you are missing the most logical application of your point, the complications of the implications of evolution (and) or creationism makes it hard to use your point effectively.

Though, if you take your argument to the root, what makes more since, that a world of ‘order’ and ‘cause and effect’ simply existed with no reason, or that you fail understand something you cannot understand (God).

[CrumbLuke]

@FreakyFatBastard There is just one assumption, the existence of God, where to attempt to disprove his existence you have to violate the basic principals in which we observe our world. Do you see my point?

[StopNWO11]

Makes sense if you have blind faith in NASA. You savvy zombies??

[oopscanada]

Very interesting video; It's incredible how all it's designed by a Creator. Good job putting it together. The conclusions at the end are way off. In the sense, you don't really explain that something cause the Universe to come to exist. And that within this vast universe, Eart, is the only planet that man knows that has life and intelligent life. Oh well; I guess something so obvious is missed when ignorance wants to deny a Creator. But other than that, I like how everything was designed.

[ShilgenVens]

@oopscanada The universe is so vast. Our knowledge of it is so limited that we could be surrounded be planets with intelligent life on them and wouldn't even know it.

[oopscanada]

@ShilgenVens Hey, I completely agree about that.  However, with what we know, and with the evidence of design; we cannot deny, everything was created by a designer.

[ShilgenVens]

@oopscanada What "evidence of design"? If we were actually "designed" our bodies wouldn't be so crappy. Seriously. C- grade for the "designer".

[oopscanada]

@ShilgenVens ; Ha ha, ha; Hey ShilgenVens; have you not been taking good care of yourself lately? It's all the starbucks coffee. Drink Green tea; that's good for you.

But seriously, science can explain how everything works; and it all makes sense. In the end, what matter is that we have an amazing mind and human body. I don't think this is by chance, though.

[FreakyFatBastard]

@oopscanada that's because the universe does not need a creator to exist. It's you that create the creator, or the human race before you that simply passed the story book on. If some one had killed the person who first made up the story, some other guy would've started guessing and making up his own. And then you could be sitting here saying magic unicorns created the universe and still make it sound true. It is just in your mind.

[oopscanada]

@FreakyFatBastard Ha ha ha; that's great imagination Freaky. Unicorns!!! ha ha ha... but seriously in the end, I'm sure you don't believe that yourself either. You know very well, that anybody can make up a story. However, what's important here, is the question, if the Universe * and* life are so simple and complex at the same time, given the law of cause and effect that we see everywhere, then, everything has a beginning. Everybody agrees with that. However...

[oopscanada]

However, if all has a beginning, it is obvious that very first things in life had an external entity to have them created in the first place. I mean, this is so obvious, that for everything else in life, we know there is a cause and effect. Take anything in life, and we apply that law. When it comes to the beginning of life, however, atheists come up with the most fantastic stories, that they themselves don't believe them.

[liamcoombes1]

If you take out the painting depicting God inside a human brain(similar to Michelangelo-creation of Adam),which is conveying the renaisance knowledge of autopsy (forbidden by the RC church),the start would run smoother. Instead we have science in front of our eyes; interplaying with a philosophical perspective of man creating god, or God in the man being communicated by the artist, whilst the voice over tells us of "magical beings and wild guesses". Otherwise excellent, succinct presentation.

[magicalbri]

Please tell me this is a joke?....either people just don't want to except the truth about GOD! creating the world and everything else..or you people are realy stupid....xDD i can't believe how dumb people can be.

[Sarahlyonz]

@magicalbri you are stupid for not realizing the world around us was not created by a jealous god who would burn us 2 the ground if he got the chance.

[oopscanada]

Really; that's a comment in poor taste. I suppose I cannot expect better coming from descendants of the monkeys.

Anyway; after looking at the design of the universe, you still can conclude this is by chance? Well, that's really smart.

You see, what we have learned from science, is how everything is layed out; but from there to infer that it all happen by chance; please; don't abuse your brain cells with such illogical conclusions.

[playadominical]

@oopscanada by chance? you aren't clear on how it works

[SuperBroman11]

None of you have most likely read Descartes I am guessing. Nor have you really took the time to consider Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. Finally, the whole realm of quantum mechanics probably doesn't figure in to your THEORY regarding "life" and its implications on religion.

Isn't all "truth" flawed by the very imperfect beings whose agenda and "logic" is never objective?

[tucsonazrick]

guess that magical beings created it all and come back at the end of this video ... LMFAO

[tucsonazrick]

thanks so much ! Muah most people need to get educated to understand these scientific observations about data gathering and the light gathering capabilities of the astronomers of the past....

understand light as it is the most beautiful thing ever

[antonio80975]

Carl Sagan ... that it lied. You were a fraud as the whole science of the universe.

[lmhjs1000]

There is no evidence for any of the thousands of gods homosapien mamals have invented. (pardon my spelling lol)

ending our journey 5000 years ago or 13.7 billion years ago with (GOD DID IT) is lazy ,illogical, and unscientific. its laughable in my opinion. If you want to worship something, worship the sun, because when it dies, all life human life along with its religion and gods will die with it

[tucsonazrick]

@lmhjs1000

im making a shirt that say this quoting you for a softball team

[lmhjs1000]

theres a lot of creationist comments on this vid. but trying to solve the problem by introducing a god does not help the creationists argument whatsoever. its a paradoxal question to say everything must have a creator, Because WHO CREATED THE CREATOR AND ITS CREATOR AND ITS CREATOR...etc...infinity

[TheMightySlusk]

Big bang might be illogical but its nothing compared to a guy floating around on the clouds, watching your every move, creating stuff and waiting to judge you when you die.

For all you believers out there. I recommend you to see the documentary "Zeitgeist the movie". Come back after you've seen it and tell me what you think. I'm actually really interested in hearing what a true believer thinks about that movie.

Ready, set, go!

[futerflash2]

i actually believe in Evolution! but i thing there is a god too because he made the earth and stuff like that but not humans

[lmhjs1000]

1. evolution is not a belief, its an accepted scientific theory. you wouldnt argue with a doctor about the best theory of possible treatment to save a cancer patient, so i dont understand how people can argue with experts.

2. if god created the earth, he sat there in heaven for 4.5 billion years watching 99.9 percent of his biological creations become extinct, and then watch his favorite children (us) live in fear and suffering for a 100 thousand years dying of hunger and disease average age 25

[oopscanada]

Actually, science just confirms what people have believed for centuries. That the universe has a designer. Hey its too bad there is no evolution in mars, that would be convincing. But unfortunately for you, only life can create life.

[Dezki]

@oopscanada

I'll assume you're a troll because I find it hard to believe you're that stupid.

[ghettohearts68]

perhaps there is a singularity. maybe there was 2 of them and everytime the move and vibrate a universe is created.

it doesnt make sence that there is a single big bang and nothing no more.

the second singularity is absolutly nothing. negularity. our universe is a uncertian moment in a quadrillion + second. a tiny twinkle out of nothing a uncertian amount of infinateness energy. a universal pocket of  unlimitless potential

[oopscanada]

Singularity; ha ha ha; that's funny man. Nice theory though. Ha ha. Hey, The more I read on cellular reproduction, and on how the elements interact according the different "laws" of nature, the more I believe that the world was designed as it is by God. I'm glad the scientists are doing more work, because the more they do it, the more we get convinced that this is not an accident. This world has a designer and a purpose. Would you like to meet your creator?

[bobbybenjamin]

@oopscanada

i guess this video based on observations made by mathematicians, scientists, and cosmologists are making you uncomfortable about your religious beliefs. we are a species successful due to our logic and reasoning, don't push science aside just to feel better because without it you would not be typing on a computer right now.

[oopscanada]

Sorry, matter cannot be created only transformed, right? So, where all the matter that is in the Universe come from? really.

It had to be created. If after that, scientists have figured out how God allow it to form stars and planets, then, good for them.

[oopscanada]

Who is talking about religion? Big. Bang from nothing? That is so illogical.

[alch3myst]

just like a gun would be illogical to a caveman, "UGH UGH, BIG BANG CAME FROM NOTHING?!" seriously...nothing is not to be taken literally...it came from a singularity...which anything BEFORE that is unknown... its still not a reason to assume any god did it...maybe one did...but theres no evidence so far

[oopscanada]

This is fantasy.

[str8texasthug]

@oopscanada no your religion is a fantasy.

[seemore3434]

this still doesnt explain life and consiousness. Explore quantum psysics for that.

[mackat747]

What do we know thow? We still know nothing :) Stupid humans, lol.

[ejbleach1]

its hard trying to come up with evidence for the bibg bang and there are flaws as well. First off scientists say the first elements were helium and hydrogenand they were brought togetherto make "population III" stars and through the massive amounts of heat on those stars the energy should be enough to make those elements form to make the heavier elements we see in stars today. yet we find no evidence of any of those "population III"even existing.

[381MM5]

humen connections to higher echelons are better with prays to allmighty in a global confluense at same time ! Imagine Andromeda is the light, love, peace, and it is soon coming to release ! So if pray is peace!? will peace release.

[SlashIStheShit]

Just do us all a favor and shut the fuck up 381MM5.

[ejbleach1]

another is that when the big bang happened it created matter but when matter is created anti-matter is also created in equal amounts and they would eventually come together and whenever this happens they destroy each otherin a violent reaction so there would be no matter to use to make anything. also when we look throuhout the universe we only find trace amounts of anti-matter. other problems are called the flatness problem the missing monopoles and etc. but u guys could look that up.

[lsjtifo]

Thanks to the uploader for the troubles taken for such informative video.

[lsjtifo]

It is infinitely tantalizing challenge to conclude on rational reasoning what caused the universe to come into existence and when, and further, how the various living beings began inhabiting earth attuning their ways to the forces of nature. Perhaps we will never know finally, or for ALL these and other related questions. One thing seems certain, even by taking the religious texts like Bible, Vedas, Quran, that man has been speculating on answers to these qns. since long.

[Dmpablaze]

think about it. thats like disassembling a watch then putting equal parts in both hands then smashing your hands together and the watch is back together and workin perfectly. but still that right there has more of a chance at happening because you have something to begin with.

[012583]

I understand what your saying, but the theory of the big bang, isn't half as far fetched as christianity. 'God said let their be light - and there was'...wow. i think the point that thousands of scientist of degree and high education standards are working on this also backs this. The bible was written many years ago, could have been by any1, never updated etc. The big band theory is forever being enhanced and updated, as our knowledge further increases.

[lsjtifo]

Theory of big bang far fetched ? We have no strong basis to say so, since we are dealing with space and time both of which may or may have had a beginning or their expanse is infinite. Most advanced mathematical methods of analysis have been developed and combined to observations of the skies and experiments in the laboratory and elsewhere. Religion is ill equipped in these respects, but it approaches the outer and inner cosmos (material, spiritual) in it own way which is not possible for all.

[Dmpablaze]

.012583 seems to be pretty pissed that other people arent accepting what he believes to be the truth. LMAO i dont know, the big bang theory. hmmm so basically the was nothing then an explosion of some sort (what exactly went boom if there was nothing to go boom in the first place?) happened and then we have to ever expanding universe. thats it right??? thats what happened??? kinda far fetched huh??? must really have some faith to believe in that theory.

[creamiorange]

dude bullshit, HALF of science is guessing! science would be nothing without theories and hypothesis. dont hate on guessing.

[BlackPapillon66]

If that is so.. Then.. what's the use for us to know of all those Truthfull Knowlege that you have gain throughout

your entire life,if at the end....

All those knowledge are going to be useless for us to know for it will vanishes along with "YOU"?!?

Hmmmmm....

Knowlege alone just not enough.. You just gotta have some Faith too. Don't you think?

[012583]

nope, you dont gain anything from faith do you. Learning into scientific theories fuels advances in technology aswell.

[stuartfox15]

yeh, cause we can use know1edge in heave, fuckin spazz, heaven goes againced a11 know1edge anyway

[BlackPapillon66]

I mean.. can you explain to me who you really are?

The "YOU" that are doing all those thinking.. the one that Feels, Dreams and Desires??

Do you you even know that "YOU" really existed or not? How can you be so sure of your answer?

Then.. how would you know if there is any purpose of life or not for any of us?

or perhaps..

You Trully belive that you are only exist now just to be vanish into the thin air once your heart fails to pump??

[012583]

you have a point to who WE are, but that doesn't mean making up and guessing without measurment and calculation an answer to where this came from. Humans do not have the brainpower/technology to answer these questions, which is why there is no need to make up an answer ' god '. science doesn't say this is how it is, they are constantly trying to find new theories and probe deeper into the answer

[stuartfox15]

yup, 1ife was a HUGE accident, but a good 1, get over it you assho1e, 1ife has no meaning and im okey with that

[BlackPapillon66]

Nice Vids.. Thanks..

Btw.. Don't think that there is any need to insult any Religion.. or any one for that matter..

If you dont Believe that there is any God "The Creator of this Univerese".. So be it..

If you just Believe that this Universe are made out of coincidence.. Hey.. who am i to dissagree?

But.. I do have a Question for all those who are wise and bright in the Science that holds the Truth of Knowledge..

Could you Please tell me.. Who "YOU" are??

[0StarGirl5000]

What was in the box?... Something that somebody put in there and seeled. Things don't get in boxes and seel themselves. Creation doesn't create it's self. Explaining how God did it, doesn't disprove that he did it.

[djunk157]

012583, all i can say to you is that you are a fuckin dumb ass!!!!!!!! Go suck your mom dick

[012583]

u fucking prick, go wank over the church u uneducated twat. Don't get angry because your dad is also your brother. Maybe you have the idea that women have dicks, but thats only your mum/dad because he/shes an ugly mistake that accidently came to earth.

[Anglebuddy18]

Wow! someone seems angry what happend to you for you to really hate the Idea of a god you an athiest. couse it takes just as much faith to not believe in a god then it does to believe in one.

[charly363rideordie]

theres no need to insult peoples beliefs ... u ass!!(012583)

[012583]

i will insult things that are made up, and i enjoy it very much. Most people who believe in religeon are spastics, not normal people. They are always self centred

[012583]

God is a figment of idiots imaginations. Christianity is nothing but a death cult mascharading as a religion. Christianity worships death as the ultimate sacriment.

Fact - Christians are born in debt, the only way u can repay ur debt is to die, brilliant deal there isn't it. Its like being asked to pay off a morgage on a house, that you already own. Especially when there is no hard evidence that the jesus of the gospals even existed, the records of him we have were written long after he died!!!!

[rockintheguitar]

there's no full proof of how the world was created dude. it's faith

[destroyhomos123]

One thing to say. Fuck evolutionists. by the way, burn in hell when you kick the bucket

[rockintheguitar]

destroyhomos123 is right you liberal democratic evolutionist faggots! btw....God rules!

[ixcaliber]

please, tell me, why do you have faith in a lie.

[rockintheguitar]

hey man that's your opinion. you can believe we were created by a rock if you want and i can believe in god.

[phatman123456789]

Gimp

[ixcaliber]

wtf, when did i say we were created by a rock?

[012583]

Look at you, ur peice of shit, ur the lowest form of human possible 'destroy homos' ur fucking sick, more like destroy filthy fucking christians. Where is hell then u prick? let me guess, u find out when u die? Fuck evolutionists yeh? thats like saying fuck truth and knowledge

[012583]

destroy homos? Your probably a closet gay yourself. Religion's well good init, so excepting and peacful, but they can't accept anything but what they beleive - go shag ur grandma

[gqstan1]

awesome awesome vid, very clear explanation, easy to follow

[drawfreak]

yeah. forget God, forget reason. We are here fore a purpose. Oh and by the way, evolution is EXTREMELY flawed. look up the facts. there is no "evidence" of any evolutionary theory.

[NwZ2]

You guys are a parasite. Everytime someone with facts and intelligence engages in you, you lie, cheat, and squirm your way out of ever admitting you're wrong.

Exposed for the fraud you are.

[syr1811]

drawfreak, Why do we have to be here for a purpose? I believe when I see evidence, and I reason. There is so much evidence for evolution, that no sane person with the capability of scientific though, who hasn't "blocked" his or her power of reasoning by handing it over to dogma could really believe otherwise. Religion tells us we are here for a purpose. Knowledge tells us we are here. I don't see it as scary that a god didn't put us here for whatever "plan" "he" had/has. OK Flame On.

[kindrachuk]

I enjoyed the video and i enjoyed the end.