Lunar hoaxers remind me not to be so harsh of the 9/11 truthers, you guys really help remind us to not hate the 9/11 truthers so much since we still have you nutcases around.
Feb 2006 : Space.com "We will image the Apollo sites and you will see the descent stages sitting on the surface," Robinson said. LROC will clearly see the overall shape of that landing hardware, but won't be able to resolve such things as the insignia on the side of the descent stage, or see the stripes on astronaut-planted flags."
Aug 2009 :Space.com "At first glance, the image from LROC appears to depict a stark lunar surface devoid of any evidence that humans were there...
Nothing could have gone better with this video than the silence it has. it really brings out the darkness and the eeriness that inhabits the lunar polar regions.
Also, I really wish the Internet would get its collective thumb out of its collective ass and stop arguing about the Apollo program everywhere the word 'Moon' pops up. Seriously guys, shut the fuck up. It was forty years ago. Get over it.
I am in an amateur radio club who has a member who is a professional microwave engineer he developed a stressed parabolic dish that he used to hear the moon walkers on the moon from their suit radios he was pointing his dish at the moon his call is k2riw posted by Paul wv2u
What about 3:22 in the shadow in the middle. Looks like a metal reflecting the light. There's a lot of other images that could have stuff in it as well. look around the shadows.
Someone please note what time I should look at, in this video, that shows ANY of the stuff left on the Moon. Check out "Google Moon"..Why does the Apollo 11 area get diff images? The resolution is there on the rest of the moon, why not the same images for Apollo 11 area?
Why doesn't NaASA just let us all know when to point our telescopes at the sky and the whole world can see the landing sites with their own eyes? Does anyone other than NASA have an image of the landing sites? Anyone?
Well the scientist that have been seending laser beams to the three retroreflector arrays left on the Moon by Apollo 11, 14, and 15 might know where the landingsites are :)
Scientists. What scientists? NASA's scientists? If it can't be INDEPENDENTLY verified, it's not scientifically legitimate. I'd like to see a picture from Joe Blow in his backyard using a telescope to see the landing site. I have yet to ever see a picture of the moon sites that WASN'T provided by NASA.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Happy 40th anniversary of the Moon lies. Im glad nasa feels the pressure to refurbish the lie. Have you seen your house on Earth Google?- compare that with those "high tech" images of nothing.
I bet you're the type of person to leave comments about 9-11 being a conspiracy too. With all the evidence provided that we've landed on the moon, how can you still refute it?
We can point a laser to the site of a manned lunar landing where they specifically left reflectors in order to retrieve data from the moon, and receive a signal. Point that laser anywhere else and you'll receive nothing back.
and isn't it fascinating that non-believers accept that man probably did circuit the moon in '69, that man can land aircraft in a highly volatile earth atmosphere (wind, moisture, pressure variants), that he can land aircraft on a planet with 6 times the gravitation pull of the moon. That he can and did do all that but couldn't get round to being able to land on an atmospherically sterile, gravitationally less demanding rock called the Moon?
Isn't it (we'll use the word fascinating to create the right conspiracy buzz).... isn't it fascinating that the people who claim NASA never landed a man on the moon are almost those same people who believe governments have covered up alien visitations.
If aliens can travel light years why so hard to believe a man walked on a moon just next door to us? In short, aren't we "aliens" to the aliens? Why are they always the ones with the highly advanced ray guns?
google earth definitely needs to forget what NASA tells them not to do, and take HQ photos of the moon, I mean, come on, they got Mars... not in HQ, but they did, I think NASA wont grant them permission to because people will try to find the moon landing gear, and will be unsuccessful, and find out the truth...
finally! :D:D:D:D just a little while longer till hopefully we can see the gear left from apollo! and it better match the positions ii dont wanna see added gear in wrong places i'll be pissed go postal on nasa hehe
This video would be 10 times better if some object like a car was superimposed over the image so that the viewer can have a sense of scale of the craters!
If your organization sent people to the moon and returned them to earth before the dawn of personal computers, would you care to 'prove' it to a bunch of noobs who can't even remember how to do long division?
Space is immense. Only light comes from stars, galaxies, reflections... etc. Other than that there is no light. Light does not shine everywhere on the moon, it only illuminates some parts of it's topography.
cazzo boia dio porco bastardo e contaminato da piselli findus surgelati gesu cane bastardo è tutto un fotomontaggio idioti nn si capisce?? è tutto fatto di plastica...ciao da MrThezip
oh, i have undestood... good answer anyway, there was a hint of irony XD
seriously, do you think that there are really alien towers on the moon? I think of yes ... we are not alone, indeed, they are closer than we realize and the NASA does not want us to believe because the UFO conspiracy!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The images look good but it's obvious they have hidden the majority of the surface under fake shadows, the reason why they have done this is only known by NASA, but it's pretty obvious they are hiding something from us. 2:49, there is a massive black patch, there is 2 possible reasons, a crater so deep sunlight cannot light it up, but this is not possible, and if it was then we would see down the gap and it would be obvious it was a hole etc.
They have to, people would ask why the fuck don't we ever see any, think about how many hundreds of hours of film they have on record, how much do we get? a few mins..
boddy can i aske you to look at the 3.24 pic agen ?
im starting to think that the big black hole isnt a gigant crater but a shadow casted from the hill / mountan on the left becours it casts a shadow to the right (you can see a singel boulder on the top of the mountan on the left and ist shadow on the far right ...
but that wod make the object in question stick way way out but only the objects walls ... or somthing
they found a real ufo in serbia,,they found it in the sea,,government has made the pictures public and they are on display on their website,,,i knew we were not alone
The video footage is immensely interesting and profoundly inspiring. It requires no music. There is no music in space, regardless of what Hollywood movies would have us think. This is dramatic without actors, music or direction. Just THINK about what you are seeing!
I sometime forget how stupid people are, then I read some of the comments on here and I am instantly reminded. People like Raagnarokk should not be allowed to breed. His comments are possibly the stupidest stuff I have ever read. In fact we are all stupider for having read his comments...what a tool, masonic masters??? seriously? He doesn't have a clue about anything yet he spouts off like a typical proud AMURIKAN! Cause hes an AMURICAN! F YA! #1! Go wave a flag or something fool.
Secrets like what, ''UFO's"!! haha, The rest of the world hates em because they cant afford a NASA Program for their own country, it doesnt benefit them and would jus make em more broke, its very expensive stuff .Why Americans hates em I dint know we did, i dont.
la gente è scema visto che pensa che non ci sia mai stato nessun allunaggio;è gente ignorante, gente che usa la bandiera americana come la carta igenica...
I wonder whith what kind of special pleading moon hoax theorist will come up with when an european or chinese mission will eventually go there and take pics of the Lunar Module and other stuff left there by Nasa.
@WeAreTheRobots Do u seriously think i would bother looking up all that crap u sent me? Waste of time. Depleted Cranium? Sure buddy.Waste someone else's time.
Third party evidence? Yeah right.And last but not least nasa dot gov LOL LMFAO
There does come a time to shut up.Keep it closed boy.
"Just like the LRO show nothing at all. 2 missions for proof & what did they come up with? NOTHING AT ALL"
I posted exactly what you say it doesn't exist. You wanted LRO images. I posted LRO and Chandrayaan-1 images of the Apollo landing sites with the evidence. They prove you wrong. :D
@WeAreTheRobots LOL I posted LRO and Chandrayaan-1 images of the Apollo landing sites with the evidence. THAT'S NOT EVIDENCE MORON- A SUPPOSED TRAIL IN THE DIRT? NO LEM BASES-NO LR'S NOTHING.
Besides the fact IF they already FAKED THE MOON LANDING-which they did-then why the fuck would you believe the shit they post today? LOL I wouldn't .
BTW WHY don't they know HOW to get back to the moon today with a manned mission? IF THEY WENT 6 TIMES BEFORE?? LOL BULLSHIT.We never ever landed on moon.
That they haven't sent more people is only because it's expensive, and they did it several times already.
Anyway, the mission was tracked by radar and optical telescopes all around the world, including in the Soviet Union. They could have called BS easily. The TV signal from the Moon was also registered in Australia.
@WeAreTheRobots Anyway, the mission was tracked by radar and optical telescopes all around the world, including in the Soviet Union.
LOL BULLSHIT LIES. The only time Russia finally was able to track "apollo" the last Apollo missions were suddenly CANCELLED. lol
we never went to the moon. but if u can't see that this country is the most CORRUPT-WAR MONGERS in history then i give up. It's in your face every day in washington.LIARS-THIEVES-CROOKS-MURDERERS-SCOUNDRELS.
Remember that there are references at the end of the page:
Large corruption doesn't automatically invalidate the Moon landings. That's a non-sequitur fallacy. Faking the landings would be much more difficult than sending people on the Moon.
@WeAreTheRobots You're a robot all right-converted into a parrot to spew apollo bullshit.
BTW do you even know how to post a reference? That page isn't even available.
Faking the landings would be much more difficult than sending people on the Moon.
ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR FUCKING MIND? That's the dumbest statement i have ever read.LOL Total bullshit.Faking a moon landing IN A STUDIO would in no way in hell cost more than a real mission THAT WAS IMPOSSIBLE IN 1969. LOL ALL BULLSHIT & LIES.
You have to edit the link,since pasting it here put a CR character (%C2%AD) in "Apollo". You're not so tech-savvy, I can see...
> Faking a moon landing IN A STUDIO
Explain the Galileo experiment, show us the _giant_ vacuum chamber.
Well, I always get the same answers from moon-hoaxers every time they are unable to prove their point. It' obvious that you don't have any counterargument here. Only "lol, bullshit, lol". It's so easy to make you run! :D
@WeAreTheRobots You have to edit the link,since pasting it here put a CR character (%C2%AD) in "Apollo". You're not so tech-savvy, I can see...
LOL FUCK YOU ASSHOLE all you have to do BRAIN DEAD is skip a space between the dot and the com asswipe. Talk about tech-savvy-you're a fucking moron loser.
YOU have no argument to begin with asswipe because LRO SHOWS NOTHING. lol
> Talk about tech-savvy-you're a fucking moron loser.
And you didn't spot the OBVIOUS CR character, so at best we call it a moronic draw.
> YOU have no argument to begin with asswipe because LRO SHOWS NOTHING
You have dismissed the images with no actual argument. Typical of hoaxers.
And you still have to address the list of evidence from third parties around the world, including that of the Soviet Union, who DID track the Apollo missions, specially the first one.
>THE SOVIET UNION (YOU LIAR) WAS UNABLE TO TRACK ANY APOLLO MISSION
Prove it.
>THEY COULDN'T EVEN TRACK THEIR OWN TO THE MOON
They sent robots,some of them returned rock samples. They had the technology to drive robots on the Moon and track them,of course.
That you spend so many characters in nonsensical insults instead of arguments speaks volumes of you. I see why you can't understand the evidence and prefer a crappy conspiranoid tale, that requires a lot less thinking, if any.
Close up:sure the LEM looks weak. Even I agree on that. But without proper sampling of material and engineering discussion (it's engineering,not aesthetic design), the points have no merit.
-Adhesive tape:prove its adhesive tape and not something else (like marks to check for misalignments).
-Buzz pics:obvious different camera exposure settings.
-Shadows:from the first pic it's obvious the twin rocks are far away, so the alignment is only apparent.
Lunar hoaxers remind me not to be so harsh of the 9/11 truthers, you guys really help remind us to not hate the 9/11 truthers so much since we still have you nutcases around.
thor25 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Feb 2006 : Space.com "We will image the Apollo sites and you will see the descent stages sitting on the surface," Robinson said. LROC will clearly see the overall shape of that landing hardware, but won't be able to resolve such things as the insignia on the side of the descent stage, or see the stripes on astronaut-planted flags."
Aug 2009 :Space.com "At first glance, the image from LROC appears to depict a stark lunar surface devoid of any evidence that humans were there...
ROFL
LOL
forestinfullbloom 1 year ago
Nothing could have gone better with this video than the silence it has. it really brings out the darkness and the eeriness that inhabits the lunar polar regions.
Also, I really wish the Internet would get its collective thumb out of its collective ass and stop arguing about the Apollo program everywhere the word 'Moon' pops up. Seriously guys, shut the fuck up. It was forty years ago. Get over it.
IzackN 1 year ago
@IzackN 40 years ago that never happened. lol
cadu1995 1 year ago
@cadu1995 Those 40 years never happened?
WHERE HAVE I BEEN ALL THIS TIME?!
IzackN 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@IzackN "40 years ago THAT never happened"
CAN YOU READ ENGLISH ASSHOLE? fucking moontards can't even read nevermind understand they were hoaxed-lol-losers
cadu1995 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@IzackN 40 years ago THAT never happened"
CAN YOU READ ENGLISH ASSHOLE? fucking moontards can't even read nevermind understand they were hoaxed-lol-losers
LOL YOU WEREN'T EVEN BORN ASSHOLE.
cadu1995 1 year ago
Fake.
GeborenInGoden 1 year ago
I am in an amateur radio club who has a member who is a professional microwave engineer he developed a stressed parabolic dish that he used to hear the moon walkers on the moon from their suit radios he was pointing his dish at the moon his call is k2riw posted by Paul wv2u
paulh40 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
meehuhm i know this is not a real chat but.. Anyone up for some cam chat
CareeLamberte4 1 year ago
At 1.10 what is ?
Actarus10412 2 years ago
Cosmored cop on..
Metatarsal 2 years ago
This is cool! I just uploaded the original 1950's newsflash thought to be aliens landing.
TheUfosighting 2 years ago
THAT MOON LOOKS TREACHEROUS!
ptscao 2 years ago
YOU JUST GOT MOONED
MonkeyKong21 2 years ago 5
What about Mars? Will you send a vehicle to capture it in HD too any soon?
TheFutureIsRightHere 2 years ago
they already did phoenix and it confirmed water on mars
fuadali16 2 years ago
I don't mean stuff left by the apollo missions either, that shit would probably be too small anyways.
immapwner 2 years ago
What about 3:22 in the shadow in the middle. Looks like a metal reflecting the light. There's a lot of other images that could have stuff in it as well. look around the shadows.
immapwner 2 years ago
Someone please note what time I should look at, in this video, that shows ANY of the stuff left on the Moon. Check out "Google Moon"..Why does the Apollo 11 area get diff images? The resolution is there on the rest of the moon, why not the same images for Apollo 11 area?
mcclshawn 2 years ago
Comment removed
javinge 2 years ago
google moon ???
charliewalls05 2 years ago
Just released. Don't see anything yet.
mcclshawn 2 years ago
Amazing video :)
s70rk 2 years ago
Why doesn't NaASA just let us all know when to point our telescopes at the sky and the whole world can see the landing sites with their own eyes? Does anyone other than NASA have an image of the landing sites? Anyone?
mcclshawn 2 years ago
@mcclshawn
Well the scientist that have been seending laser beams to the three retroreflector arrays left on the Moon by Apollo 11, 14, and 15 might know where the landingsites are :)
MrSvendErik 2 years ago
Scientists. What scientists? NASA's scientists? If it can't be INDEPENDENTLY verified, it's not scientifically legitimate. I'd like to see a picture from Joe Blow in his backyard using a telescope to see the landing site. I have yet to ever see a picture of the moon sites that WASN'T provided by NASA.
mcclshawn 2 years ago
Some people's ignorance astounds me.
javinge 2 years ago
Right back at ya.
mcclshawn 2 years ago
Google Bad Astronomy, website maintained by a Mr Phil Plait, should debunk every little doubt your feeble mind can muster.
javinge 2 years ago 7
Have you looked? Your mistake is that you think NASA is the only group in space.
AbelMagwitch73 2 years ago
Please point me to an image of the moon landings NOT provided by NASA.
mcclshawn 2 years ago
LMFAO???
Nc1027 2 years ago
No one has a telescope that can see something that small on the moon...
LordofKings135 2 years ago
So I can use a telescope to individual rocks, but not an entire landing craft?
mcclshawn 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Happy 40th anniversary of the Moon lies. Im glad nasa feels the pressure to refurbish the lie. Have you seen your house on Earth Google?- compare that with those "high tech" images of nothing.
vladika07 2 years ago
I bet you're the type of person to leave comments about 9-11 being a conspiracy too. With all the evidence provided that we've landed on the moon, how can you still refute it?
We can point a laser to the site of a manned lunar landing where they specifically left reflectors in order to retrieve data from the moon, and receive a signal. Point that laser anywhere else and you'll receive nothing back.
thatsgoodkarma 2 years ago 2
Detailed Googlearth images are taken by plane, not form satellites.
synsei1 2 years ago
I keep seeing a ufo right in the middle of the screen.
Traumatoast 2 years ago
and isn't it fascinating that non-believers accept that man probably did circuit the moon in '69, that man can land aircraft in a highly volatile earth atmosphere (wind, moisture, pressure variants), that he can land aircraft on a planet with 6 times the gravitation pull of the moon. That he can and did do all that but couldn't get round to being able to land on an atmospherically sterile, gravitationally less demanding rock called the Moon?
WhoDoYouWant 2 years ago
Isn't it (we'll use the word fascinating to create the right conspiracy buzz).... isn't it fascinating that the people who claim NASA never landed a man on the moon are almost those same people who believe governments have covered up alien visitations.
If aliens can travel light years why so hard to believe a man walked on a moon just next door to us? In short, aren't we "aliens" to the aliens? Why are they always the ones with the highly advanced ray guns?
WhoDoYouWant 2 years ago 2
google earth definitely needs to forget what NASA tells them not to do, and take HQ photos of the moon, I mean, come on, they got Mars... not in HQ, but they did, I think NASA wont grant them permission to because people will try to find the moon landing gear, and will be unsuccessful, and find out the truth...
MrPacMan36 2 years ago
this is computer generated
noongar1234 2 years ago
Possibly - but it's possibly real footage too. Isn't that what real footage would look like?
utube9000 2 years ago
finally! :D:D:D:D just a little while longer till hopefully we can see the gear left from apollo! and it better match the positions ii dont wanna see added gear in wrong places i'll be pissed go postal on nasa hehe
yourboycal 2 years ago
cool
singlespies 2 years ago
This video would be 10 times better if some object like a car was superimposed over the image so that the viewer can have a sense of scale of the craters!
javonoUTube 2 years ago
When is there going to be a Google Moon?
phototaker84 2 years ago
yer, theyv already got mars, the moon must be easyer
chillz27 2 years ago
they should already create a Google Brain for the dumb ppl of the Earth before going on other planets
killer2403 2 years ago
wow........ a spinning rock.
hairspray1979 2 years ago
I think NASA should show the world that US really been to the moon....I never seen traces from this video. or not on this side.
btpaopao 2 years ago
If your organization sent people to the moon and returned them to earth before the dawn of personal computers, would you care to 'prove' it to a bunch of noobs who can't even remember how to do long division?
iliveonplanetearth 2 years ago
I want that as a screen saver.....
raaandoms 2 years ago 2
Beautiful! Like walk on the moon ;)
Tsjetsjener 2 years ago
60,606 views. I cant see moonwalkers
roncattube 2 years ago
Break out the floyd! Dark side of the moon....
nosorab3 2 years ago
ya wats going on
why av they made huge patches of black??
SaucyBoii 2 years ago
Space is immense. Only light comes from stars, galaxies, reflections... etc. Other than that there is no light. Light does not shine everywhere on the moon, it only illuminates some parts of it's topography.
MutatedIguana 2 years ago
shadow
000069sex 2 years ago
i wonder whats under the dark areas... lol
SugarVenom000 2 years ago
cazzo boia dio porco bastardo e contaminato da piselli findus surgelati gesu cane bastardo è tutto un fotomontaggio idioti nn si capisce?? è tutto fatto di plastica...ciao da MrThezip
MrThezip 2 years ago
wow, this is quite...... boring
gjcauilan 2 years ago 2
What alot of damage to the surface... the "moon" looks like it has "died" a very long time ago...
GUESTIMATE 2 years ago
lolz
xxxxlawrencexxxx 2 years ago
sisi, mucho vídeo pero todavía no han sido capaces de pisar la Luna.
Morenowez 2 years ago
why not any HD footage of all the alien bases on the moon?....I bet NASA won't release those!
9thprotocol 2 years ago
IF there are any alien bases on the moon, that is.
MutatedIguana 2 years ago
They should go when it's full moon cause it's dark and we can't see shit
Faithless863 2 years ago
ur blind
TheLyricBox 2 years ago
or you have x-ray for eyes
Faithless863 2 years ago
If you're filming the earthset during full moon, the sun would be somewhere behind the earth, blinding the camera and the earth would be dark.
bnightm 2 years ago
yes but ironic comments don't always have to have perfect sense
Faithless863 2 years ago
Type in JakeRs Decade. There's lots more of what your looking for.
JokeRtheJakeR 2 years ago
3:05 Darth Vader appear in one crater... pay attention
IJariJuniorI 2 years ago
Is it just me or is this intensely boring?
A7Xbares 2 years ago
Looks like something I found in my toilet last night after a few coolers and pizza ROFL
oOSLEEPAHOo 2 years ago
ye thx.. now i started picture the video in brown colors...
Xirus5 2 years ago
OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
MartinvsrxD 2 years ago
i meant, color is not present on the moon.
zodiacfml 2 years ago
there is no color there.
zodiacfml 2 years ago
You think Scully and Mulder would like this video?
delacerdaa 2 years ago
pity it's not in colour............nice pics though
GNeuman 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Faked ...
jaekent 2 years ago
where are the alien towers?????
peppemasia 2 years ago
They are hidden within the alien cloaking field made by our lizard overlords!
TouchedProductions 2 years ago
ahahah!
peppemasia 2 years ago
No. Seriously!
TouchedProductions 2 years ago
oh, i have undestood... good answer anyway, there was a hint of irony XD
seriously, do you think that there are really alien towers on the moon? I think of yes ... we are not alone, indeed, they are closer than we realize and the NASA does not want us to believe because the UFO conspiracy!
excuse for writing, but I am Italian ^ ^
peppemasia 2 years ago
If there are indeed alien towers, rest assured they will not show up on any NASA footage. ;)
TheStupidComedy 2 years ago
dark areas.... lol... for sure
defaultname365 2 years ago
I agree with you! :P
peppemasia 2 years ago
Major national deficits in the USA and then they want to go back to a huge rock...strange people those Americans...sigh
82vv28 2 years ago
Moonwalk!!!
djnavi850 2 years ago
Hence why they made a 24'7 TV station that shows everything around the clock too.
GrandTheftAuto4Films 2 years ago
woow espectacular !!
BKBIRI 2 years ago
no sound ? ! j/k
w9x7cv3vg6 2 years ago
Comment removed
zombiedestroyr 2 years ago
increible!!!
hernan6428 2 years ago
Very interesting, at moon !
beatboy001 2 years ago
pretty cool;
you guys should do a flyover of the MOON BASES
djsuperstar717 2 years ago 2
Nasa whem are you going back to the moon oh my what a camera it looks unreal but is facinating
ingridgott 2 years ago
So how come we havent gone back to the moon?
delacerdaa 2 years ago
Gone back???
flyhead2 2 years ago
Have you looked at it???
82vv28 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The images look good but it's obvious they have hidden the majority of the surface under fake shadows, the reason why they have done this is only known by NASA, but it's pretty obvious they are hiding something from us. 2:49, there is a massive black patch, there is 2 possible reasons, a crater so deep sunlight cannot light it up, but this is not possible, and if it was then we would see down the gap and it would be obvious it was a hole etc.
G0dsAssassin 2 years ago
I am impress with your comentarie
ingridgott 2 years ago
if they have something to hide they wouldn't even show us these vids
mechanema 2 years ago
They have to, people would ask why the fuck don't we ever see any, think about how many hundreds of hours of film they have on record, how much do we get? a few mins..
G0dsAssassin 2 years ago
I am a threat to the industry. I am a threat to workers in white-collar. I am a threat to the old. I make history. I Make Industry.I make Innovation
SYMBOLSUN 2 years ago
it would be very interesting to see how that camera works !!
coolchanga 2 years ago
So I cant wait for this to hit earth!
9Silent0Harmony2 2 years ago
IMHO, Fairchild Imaging could have made a better TDI sensor for your LORC. I know this to be true.
The images are amazing!
Avigadro 2 years ago
chimp face at 1:44.
IsmaHelio 2 years ago
LOL you're right!
StapledNote 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
yeah, I can do those pics...fake just like a moon and mars fake videos..
asrimostalg 2 years ago
awesome :D
narcoman1 2 years ago 2
"should've... sent... poet..." -Contact
Darthdarbinks1 2 years ago
i can clearly see the giant alien space station its true!
Sakul1321 2 years ago
Yay for the moon! =D
jMANhcc 2 years ago 2
i see somthing 3.24 inside the crater
can anyone guess the object ?
thanks
glasseay 2 years ago
it apprears to be light reflecting off a smaller crater of circular ridge on the edge of the bigger one, no object just the light playing tricks
Daviebones 2 years ago
thanks m8 :)
glasseay 2 years ago
boddy can i aske you to look at the 3.24 pic agen ?
im starting to think that the big black hole isnt a gigant crater but a shadow casted from the hill / mountan on the left becours it casts a shadow to the right (you can see a singel boulder on the top of the mountan on the left and ist shadow on the far right ...
but that wod make the object in question stick way way out but only the objects walls ... or somthing
im not saying its ET
im just asking cours it dont look right to me
thanks
glasseay 2 years ago
delay that request
i contackted the nasa dude of this vid
and saw the original vid and it is so mutch clearer and yes your right
its a rim of a crader no doubt
(sights) well ... moving on
anyway thanks for your attention
glasseay 2 years ago
Dargakis, the moon is pretty much all gray. Color wouldn't show much and the B/W sensors have far higher resolution.
KenLaunchMag 2 years ago
amazing!!!!
andybrbs 2 years ago
they found a real ufo in serbia,,they found it in the sea,,government has made the pictures public and they are on display on their website,,,i knew we were not alone
thepunisher300 2 years ago
in the sea, huh ?
amazing, considering the fact that serbia is surrounded 100% by land
LOL
stalingrad66 2 years ago
Niceone! :)
Wuklock 2 years ago
what is the page?
funkerror 2 years ago
I am flabbergasted. Well done NASA
SexyToshi 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Wow, HD and all that and still no colour,
great Nasa, just great..
Dargakis 2 years ago
The video footage is immensely interesting and profoundly inspiring. It requires no music. There is no music in space, regardless of what Hollywood movies would have us think. This is dramatic without actors, music or direction. Just THINK about what you are seeing!
OldSchoolSkill 2 years ago
is that Saturn!?
kciNJNadon 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ITS UR ANUS
MonkeyKong21 2 years ago
ou comeone NASA, atleast some music:]
Shifticek 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I sometime forget how stupid people are, then I read some of the comments on here and I am instantly reminded. People like Raagnarokk should not be allowed to breed. His comments are possibly the stupidest stuff I have ever read. In fact we are all stupider for having read his comments...what a tool, masonic masters??? seriously? He doesn't have a clue about anything yet he spouts off like a typical proud AMURIKAN! Cause hes an AMURICAN! F YA! #1! Go wave a flag or something fool.
StupidAmericansSuck 2 years ago 2
k dude stupider isnt a word, smart one
JKennedy2234 2 years ago
Where is the flag?
unospino79 2 years ago
Sites*******
YawnGod 2 years ago
where is this?
luckeycat 2 years ago
its the moon
lunar=moon
superbigboy16 2 years ago
ooohhhhhhhh...never read the title...
luckeycat 2 years ago
More. I want more! Now! ha ha ha
teemuruskeepaa 2 years ago
I love NASA. Awesome shots as usual, nobody does it better.
nethoser 2 years ago
Kubrick did.
flyhead2 2 years ago
This will make an excellent wallpaper!
Hope I can use it that way...
transistor09 2 years ago
Secrets like what, ''UFO's"!! haha, The rest of the world hates em because they cant afford a NASA Program for their own country, it doesnt benefit them and would jus make em more broke, its very expensive stuff .Why Americans hates em I dint know we did, i dont.
LilTortillaBoy420 2 years ago
There .... !!!! I see Starscream!! :-D
supersetan2008 2 years ago 4
those are just soap suds on a black car :P
GoldenRizzla 2 years ago 4
HD cameras sure bring it to life, compared to the crappy cameras of 40yrs ago.
Randallh2008 2 years ago
Don't refer to taste, which is only relative. The cams where the best there were and better than some. Talk about what they achieved with the photos.
teemuruskeepaa 2 years ago
la gente è scema visto che pensa che non ci sia mai stato nessun allunaggio;è gente ignorante, gente che usa la bandiera americana come la carta igenica...
escofal 2 years ago
Why does everone hate NASA?
Blue2Scripter 2 years ago
Because they keep too many secrets from the world.
xoxMelodyxox 2 years ago
This looks fake.
dollar12 2 years ago
So, where were now those things left there by apollo 11 if the first land on the moon was true?
myphonevideo 2 years ago
Still on the moon where they were left.
Where did you think they were?
ytmoog 2 years ago
I wonder whith what kind of special pleading moon hoax theorist will come up with when an european or chinese mission will eventually go there and take pics of the Lunar Module and other stuff left there by Nasa.
synsei1 2 years ago
@synsei1 The Japanese Kaguya was supposed to show all the shit left on the moon by astro-nots-GUESS WHAT GENIUS??? IT DIDN'T SHOW ANYTHING. WHY NOT?
Because man has NEVER LANDED ON THE MOON DUMMY.
Just like the LRO show nothing at all. 2 missions for proof & what did they come up with? NOTHING AT ALL.
NASA never landed men on the moon genius. LOL LMFAO
cadu1995 1 year ago
WeAreTheRobots 1 year ago
@WeAreTheRobots Do u seriously think i would bother looking up all that crap u sent me? Waste of time. Depleted Cranium? Sure buddy.Waste someone else's time.
Third party evidence? Yeah right.And last but not least nasa dot gov LOL LMFAO
There does come a time to shut up.Keep it closed boy.
cadu1995 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@cadu1995
"Do u seriously think i would bother looking up all that crap u sent me? Waste of time."
Anyone can notice your butthurt. :D
You wanted Kaguya and LRO pictures: there you have them, I have proven you wrong.
Third party evidence further debunks your beliefs.
You really don't care about evidence, you care about your ego. Good luck with your fantasy world.
WeAreTheRobots 1 year ago
@WeAreTheRobots i'm supposed to sift thru that garbage post you put up? lol
cadu1995 1 year ago
@cadu1995
"Just like the LRO show nothing at all. 2 missions for proof & what did they come up with? NOTHING AT ALL"
I posted exactly what you say it doesn't exist. You wanted LRO images. I posted LRO and Chandrayaan-1 images of the Apollo landing sites with the evidence. They prove you wrong. :D
WeAreTheRobots 1 year ago
@WeAreTheRobots LOL I posted LRO and Chandrayaan-1 images of the Apollo landing sites with the evidence. THAT'S NOT EVIDENCE MORON- A SUPPOSED TRAIL IN THE DIRT? NO LEM BASES-NO LR'S NOTHING.
Besides the fact IF they already FAKED THE MOON LANDING-which they did-then why the fuck would you believe the shit they post today? LOL I wouldn't .
BTW WHY don't they know HOW to get back to the moon today with a manned mission? IF THEY WENT 6 TIMES BEFORE?? LOL BULLSHIT.We never ever landed on moon.
cadu1995 1 year ago
@cadu1995
Moving the goalpost much?
Here you have the details:
blogs. discovermagazine. com/ badastronomy/ 2009/ 07/ 17/ apollo-landing-sites-imaged-by-lro/
That they haven't sent more people is only because it's expensive, and they did it several times already.
Anyway, the mission was tracked by radar and optical telescopes all around the world, including in the Soviet Union. They could have called BS easily. The TV signal from the Moon was also registered in Australia.
WeAreTheRobots 1 year ago
@WeAreTheRobots Anyway, the mission was tracked by radar and optical telescopes all around the world, including in the Soviet Union.
LOL BULLSHIT LIES. The only time Russia finally was able to track "apollo" the last Apollo missions were suddenly CANCELLED. lol
we never went to the moon. but if u can't see that this country is the most CORRUPT-WAR MONGERS in history then i give up. It's in your face every day in washington.LIARS-THIEVES-CROOKS-MURDERERS-SCOUNDRELS.
cadu1995 1 year ago
@cadu1995
"LOL BULLSHIT LIES. The only time Russia finally was able to track "apollo" the last Apollo missions were suddenly CANCELLED."
Then debunk every point in this lis:
en. wikipedia. org/ wiki/ Third-party_evidence_for_Apollo_Moon_landings
Remember that there are references at the end of the page:
Large corruption doesn't automatically invalidate the Moon landings. That's a non-sequitur fallacy. Faking the landings would be much more difficult than sending people on the Moon.
WeAreTheRobots 1 year ago
@WeAreTheRobots You're a robot all right-converted into a parrot to spew apollo bullshit.
BTW do you even know how to post a reference? That page isn't even available.
Faking the landings would be much more difficult than sending people on the Moon.
ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR FUCKING MIND? That's the dumbest statement i have ever read.LOL Total bullshit.Faking a moon landing IN A STUDIO would in no way in hell cost more than a real mission THAT WAS IMPOSSIBLE IN 1969. LOL ALL BULLSHIT & LIES.
cadu1995 1 year ago
@cadu1995
>That page isn't even available.
You have to edit the link,since pasting it here put a CR character (%C2%AD) in "Apollo". You're not so tech-savvy, I can see...
> Faking a moon landing IN A STUDIO
Explain the Galileo experiment, show us the _giant_ vacuum chamber.
Well, I always get the same answers from moon-hoaxers every time they are unable to prove their point. It' obvious that you don't have any counterargument here. Only "lol, bullshit, lol". It's so easy to make you run! :D
WeAreTheRobots 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@WeAreTheRobots You have to edit the link,since pasting it here put a CR character (%C2%AD) in "Apollo". You're not so tech-savvy, I can see...
LOL FUCK YOU ASSHOLE all you have to do BRAIN DEAD is skip a space between the dot and the com asswipe. Talk about tech-savvy-you're a fucking moron loser.
YOU have no argument to begin with asswipe because LRO SHOWS NOTHING. lol
cadu1995 1 year ago
@cadu1995
> Talk about tech-savvy-you're a fucking moron loser.
And you didn't spot the OBVIOUS CR character, so at best we call it a moronic draw.
> YOU have no argument to begin with asswipe because LRO SHOWS NOTHING
You have dismissed the images with no actual argument. Typical of hoaxers.
And you still have to address the list of evidence from third parties around the world, including that of the Soviet Union, who DID track the Apollo missions, specially the first one.
WeAreTheRobots 1 year ago
@WeAreTheRobots including that of the Soviet Union, who DID track the Apollo missions, specially the first one.
YOU MORONIC FUCKTARD-THE SOVIET UNION (YOU LIAR) WAS UNABLE TO TRACK ANY APOLLO MISSION ASSHOLE.
THEY COULDN'T EVEN TRACK THEIR OWN TO THE MOON SHITHEAD. THEY HAD TO ASK ENGLAND TO DO IT FOR THEM YOU FUCKTARD LOSER.
WE never went to any moon LIAR.
you are a fucking robot asswipe.and a parrot & a sheep boy loser.
take your cr & shove it bitchboy who can't put simple websites up
cadu1995 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@cadu1995
>THE SOVIET UNION (YOU LIAR) WAS UNABLE TO TRACK ANY APOLLO MISSION
Prove it.
>THEY COULDN'T EVEN TRACK THEIR OWN TO THE MOON
They sent robots,some of them returned rock samples. They had the technology to drive robots on the Moon and track them,of course.
That you spend so many characters in nonsensical insults instead of arguments speaks volumes of you. I see why you can't understand the evidence and prefer a crappy conspiranoid tale, that requires a lot less thinking, if any.
WeAreTheRobots 1 year ago
@WeAreTheRobots aulis . com is a simple way to explain it to a simpleton-
just skip a space moron.
aulis . com/jackstudies_4.html
MORON
BTW THAT is supposed to be the LEM ON THE MOON-LOL All cardboard & duct tape. NASA PHOTOS GENIUS. lol loser
cadu1995 1 year ago
@cadu1995
I visited your source. It's a joke.
Close up:sure the LEM looks weak. Even I agree on that. But without proper sampling of material and engineering discussion (it's engineering,not aesthetic design), the points have no merit.
-Adhesive tape:prove its adhesive tape and not something else (like marks to check for misalignments).
-Buzz pics:obvious different camera exposure settings.
-Shadows:from the first pic it's obvious the twin rocks are far away, so the alignment is only apparent.
WeAreTheRobots 1 year ago
@cadu1995 Dont you think they would have at least faked some photos from the LRO? Why didnt they?
bwd81977 1 year ago