Neutron Star Explosion

[bofawziii]

nice sh!t asshole

[615bacon]

This is more like a Type 1a Supernova. The energy the neutron star is collecting from its binary companion is too much to hold in, so sometimes it will explode in that sort of way.

[orange252]

chuck norris born !!!!!

[drtony999]

Well, is this real or made-up?

[bogieman987]

LOL i thought that neutron star was a black hole for some reason.

[omgnotreally]

*8 tails*

RASENGAN!

[MrIlovetrance]

whoho its suck hard :D!

[homeyG75]

my pokemon is evolving!

[09AZ311]

Neutron star only explodes when collided with another newtron star which will them form into a black hole

[Ricardommorales]

nasahistory.webnode(dot)com

[killer1302]

lol your actually sad enough to have ann other acount to give yourself thumbs up and us thumbs down you really MUST be a 10 year old incest miscarriage xD

[blazednlovinit]

i was thinking that, looking at how linear the thumbs up/down are, and in a one week period on a video thats had < 100,000 views in 2 years

[blazednlovinit]

PS i just clicked his name and in red at the top is "THIS ACCOUNT IS SUSPENDED"

FAIL

[levitan71]

hmm what to say oh.. iknow

go fuck yourself

[killer1302]

wtf your a retard im srry i spelled it wrong i dont come from an english speaking country but wtf it aint a big deal

[killer1302]

dude this happens wenn hydroxin falls to a neutron star... becouse of the immense presure on a neutron star it immidiately becomes liquid and starts dusing together to form helium... but at some point wenn the surface of a neutron star is covered in a layer of about one meter of liquid helium it gets compressed enough to melt together again to form carbon cousing the surface of the neutron star to 'ignite' thats called a x- ray buster

[levitan71]

neutron stars dont exsplode but they "burp" exess matter

[Guard655]

Uh..WTF is this..Lol..

[jonathanharwood]

I see no explotion, But a black hole mearly eating a sun.

[killer1302]

a neutron star dude

[dreamscomealives]

its kinda funny hearing all the complaints and trying to prove everyone wrong in these types of videos. cause every video i look at about space has people fighting X) in a good way though.

[bradsoar]

i have a pet black hole

[LoserificMe]

what does he eat -.- you ?

[Stormgebieder]

Spank your teacher, black holes DO have mass, in fact, it's because of their (ENORMOUS) mass that they bent the space-time fabric in such a way that not even light can escape for it.

And a black hole is the offspring of a supernova, blackhole supernova's do NOT exist.

[ghty102]

very good storm, gromni you should study a video on the theory of general relativity it will explain this in more depth.

[Lokivoid]

Sorta, They have mass but its a singularity. But the current popular theory is the mass has collasped in on it self essentualy making its mass zero or infinate. Singularity is allways used to describe blackholes past the event horizon becuse they break the current known laws of physic's.

[Gromnix]

yeah when a star gous out it turns in to a black hole ( not always or usually) i dont know u have to forgive me im only 14 !! but anyway when it turns in to a black hole its theoretically "nothing" for it has no mass or structure - its just a rip in space time!!1 atleast thats what our teacher says and if this is wrong blame it on him not me!! k..alright!! wazzaaa

[Ponoran1]

what would happen if there was no black hole?

would it be good to not have a black hole?

[dethonius]

i see good april joke youtube putting everything upsidedown lol

[infrared337]

yeah its fuuuuuuuuuunnnnnnnnyyyyyyyyyyy­y :D

[dethonius]

better then they did last year

[themondster]

Hypernova = Black hole Supernova=Neutron star and nova = star just burning out to nothing

[spike0804]

there is no such thing as black hole supernova.........and a star just can't burn out to nothing

[vide0viwer]

wrong a black can be made in a super nova as well. A neutron star is only made when a star goes super nova and 10% of its mass is crushed into a neutron star.

[Aprilgirlable]

u mean a black hole ended this nuetron star ?

[vide0viwer]

what no and i don't think you read my comment correctly

[sedateflame1]

what if a black hole got so much power to where it exploded i want to see that if it is posible

[heeh2]

im not sure but i think the nature of a black hole makes that impossible

[fonkyman]

heeh2 is right black holes do not explode they are made of nothing but gravity so there is nothing to explode and none of us ofcourse have a clue where black holes lead to or what else exactly happens when entering one(if that was even possible for us,... also for those that believe in it wormholes and blackholes are the same thing only they believe what einstein said that space ''folds'' where there is a blackhole... but we wont find out on account of getting crushed.. hope ive been helpfull

[Burnz2much]

actually the force of gravity within a black hole is caused by the immense ammount of material crushed to such a small size, the more material it consumes the more gravity it will have..

[kr8or]

burnz2much is exactly right, the black hole feed off other ..everything lol, so the more it consumes the bigger and powerfull it gets, it is not a shape or a thing, it is a hole made due to the emmense presure and enegry it gets from destroyin anythin it comes its way and trust me u will be pulverized light years before u get to it

[spike0804]

well...light years is a bit too far...its not...quite..that strong

[mikeberserkr]

go to school moron, you dont know anything

[lerokz]

Super nova's are Violent while nova's just dissapate..or waste away, not as big of a bang

[acertm]

LMFAO!

[lerokz]

...That is a black hole with young hot blue doomed sun as its companion...and the sun will go nova..not SUPER-nova...it expands and engulfs the 4 inner planets more or less making life impossible for the 4 inner worlds neutron stars are white/brighter blue and are small about the size somewhere around the moon I think...please do not give incorrec titles...

[CESARVALDESPINO]

whats the diff between super nova and nova

[MomotarosSWORD]

i think super nova is stronger than nova?

[sedateflame1]

no you think so?

[PaladinSwordNagrand]

someone tell me why the star just exploded

[EskolainenKarma]

The whole standard model is wrong.

[taylor2467]

/a neutron cant exploud, its inpossible!

[fishingthewatershed]

I think this a representation of cygnus x1 and it's mysterious companion.

[imworthmoney]

this guy must be a fruity artard rofl

[nelldd8]

smh you are a fool you should do some serious research

[snakevidal]

well we wont be here when that happens thats for sure =)

[ZZZcatsy]

a star uses nuclear fusion to stop itself from compressing itself inward, when it runs out it losses its own gravity and expands, much like what would happen to your head if you went out in space :p. then finally it implodes into itself. and for our sun to explode it would have to have 8 times to mass

[Pimpmastahanhduece]

correct, but at the same time, much of it will not explode but rather keep expanding leisurely until it engulfs the planets and i think it stops some distance before mars where its no longer a lethal out burst. the remaining inside becomes a white dwarf. this is sort of recycling the solar system but not enough to sustain life on the new eddies.

[49isbetter]

I thought nuclear fusion is what created the star its just probably both. I just never knew that.

[cursedlemon]

I thought novas only happened on white dwarfs.

[hayessekou]

no novas happend on a dying star including the sun but the super nova of the sun is known as the big bang

[cursedlemon]

lmfao

[Nat3skiz]

you my friend, are a fool

[noob955]

wow you have reached a new level of stupidity, the big bang theory is a theory that the universe and all matter originated from a supper dense and hot atom(or something the size of an atom)witch exploded in to the mother of all explosions (thus is called the "big bang")and the sun is too small to explode in to a supernova.

[mauricbsky]

the Big Bang was obviously an explosion of SPACE, and Not an explosion of matter.

[noob955]

so explain where matter came from?

[Mogzyx]

@noob955 I could, if you interested reply.

[Krawnikal]

lol at mauric.

[Shinakumiatsu]

Idiot.

[TEAMARKANSAS01]

the sun will not go nova... its "death" will be peacefull, realitivly of coarse... turning into a white dwarf arter swelling in size to a red giantesque. As a white dwarf it will live on for many more million years giving off energy equivelant to a household toaster.... reletivly speaking of coarse.

[NizzBomb69]

white dwarfs live for billions of years not millions

[kizuya420]

best case scenerio anyway...worst case, in 5m or 5b years when it does go supernova, our ancestors, if the human race is still alive and on earth an hasnt left it due to no o-zone layer/atmosphere, or due to lack of resources, etc, then we are screwed lol

[goodcommentguy]

No, the sun won't become a black hole. If it were to become a black hole, the sun would have to be classified as a "supergiant", which is about....I don't know but it's like, at least 100 times bigger. someone please correct me

[metaur1]

Actually, when a star reaches it's really old years, it starts to burn another gas, Iunno what is is though. As time passes, our sun will get bigger and bigger, eventually swallowing nearby planets and baking the earth.

[Shinakumiatsu]

He's still right. the Sun is no where near the classification of "a star that will be a Super Giant". Its size isnt enough to get it to that level when it is older.

[noob955]

the sun is a small star that will expand into a medium star, giants and supergiants explode in to supernovas or collapse into neutron stars or collapse in to black holes.

the sun will probably become a white dwarf.

[Shinakumiatsu]

Actually. It consists of the markings that it will expand to a Giant. Giants do not explode while Super Giants and Hyper Giants do.

[noob955]

sorry my mistake, i forgot the hyper giant class star.

[Shinakumiatsu]

No need to apologize. Its a simple misunderstanding of terms. but yea. The Sun has the markings to expand pretty far. There has been speculation that when it does that it will push the orbits of earth and everything else after it would be pushed away a bit further at a slightly safer distance. Then after a few billion years it will simply fall apart the core would turn into a White Dwarf. Pretty intense stuff.

[kenshn890]

i know this is a bullshit question but

our sun?? did it came to a black hole???im asking everyone (also sumerians) just asking and i dont want that to happen

[kenshn890]

oi,oi you should do that huh WTF are YOU! BIATCH!

[danedaworld]

shit black hole ownd the star...black holes evaporate though...

[wazzzzaaappp]

no its mainly about maths and stuff idrk but. its like we're all made out of matter and the sheer size of a black hole, when something hits it it somehow manages to just strip everything of mattah, therefore it gets bigger and then as it gets bigger theres more gravity so more pull force so things get pulled in faster and then it strips and so on

[TokyoShadow]

Does anyone know what goes or whats in a black hole. Is it like a dimension?

[klpeekl2000]

How are we supposed to know?

[ragephene]

the best guess is that it is absolutly nothing different than any other point in space. The material inside a black hole is just highly compact.

Think of normal matter as newly fallen snow, it is very fluffy and has a great deal of space inbetween the snowflakes. Pick up a couple handfulls, while it is fresh snow the volume could be say 5 cubic centimeters, when you pack this snow down its mass remains the same but its volume is now 1 cubic centimeter. A black hole is the same concept

[Timmytard190]

I read in some random book once that eventually when all space has been forming blackholes, and all planets and stars have been destroyed, the black holes will suck time itself, and all of time will stop

[eatmykeyboard]

bigobriener I agree that i have a leaky ringhole, one of the theories is that you travel through my ringhole and when you reach the end, anythin that gets sucked, is turned in to squirrel eating oranges.

[bigobriener]

mmmm, since we always see the face of a black hole, how come we never see whats behind it.. im convinced they are worm holes, just cause we cant see whats in the midle (considering light cant escape it) dosnt mean its not there...

im not usually into these sort of things, thanks youtube :)

[Arnes111]

bigobriener I agree that there's a wormhole, one of the theories is that you travel through the wormhole and when you reach the end, anythin that gets sucked, is turned in to zero matter.

[bigobriener]

getting sucked into black hole becomes zero matter isnt it?

wormhole is just a gravitational tube that pulls you at such speed and distance, time becomes nothing.

[ticklesnooooooooo]

there is little of chance that a black hole exists. And for that matter a wormhole. In order for a wormhole to appear there must be a white hole. Which has an extremely low probability of existing in the first place

[bigobriener]

white hole?

info please :)

[KamakazieIdiot]

short version- opposite of a black holen (it repells)

[empeus]

it realy exists??

[KamakazieIdiot]

it probably exists, nobody is sure

[birudagmawi]

I think is called a Nova(Not Supernova). The neutron star accumulates enough plasma from the blue giant to start the chain of nuclear reaction, temporarily burning the ejected gas and shining brightly from minutes,hours, or even months.

[Cypherus21]

^Yes correct. It's called a Nova Explosion - the same as when White Dwarfs accrete matter from a nearby Red Giant that has crossed the Roche Limit. Whereas White Dwarfs explode when the chandrasekhar limit of 1.4 solar masses is exceed, neutron star chandrasekhar limit is 1.4-3 solar masses, since neutron degeneracy pressure requires more pressure to unlassle.

[bmx4lif32]

dam i was wrong its a black hole lol i think. (i might be wrong again)

[bmx4lif32]

a neutron sar is the desnisiest thing we know off you'd be buggered if you went near it.

[AnduinX]

The fact that neutron stars emit light proves they're not the densest thing we know of. Black holes are denser than neutron stars. Black holes rip neutrons stars to shreds when they get too close.

[bmx4lif32]

true, but its really the singularity that's the densest bit of the black hole, of infinite density. but yeah a black hole is more dense than a neutron star. and the sun to have created one must be at least 3x as big as our sun

[stevenckb]

the scary part... is the after math. what if it creats a black whole?

[ladyvalerius]

thats scary <:(

[MaiL0MaN3]

hell yeah it is.

[narutoman1900]

it is D:

[Lokivoid]

nah the scary part isent the destructive power alone its the fact that the destructive force is comeing from a object the size of a pin head

[korteksi]

Eh.. That's a neutron star, not a black hole. And anyway, if it was a black hole it would be much smaller than a pin head. In fact, a singularity doesn't take any space; it is a point where the curvature of the spacetime becomes infinite. ;)

[Lokivoid]

neutron stars are around 5-10 miles in diameter, Your thinking of primordial blackholes those can be formd with as little as two neutrons. but in theory those could only be formed by a massive amount of energy that of the bigbang.

[Wraithgoddess]

thats a trip lol

[kingpumkinjack]

thats not an explosion its a black hole absorbing a star

[MaiL0MaN5]

no, Its a small neutron star absorbing a middle sized blue star. Neutron stars have a monstrous gravitational pull although its a little small. And when it comes into orbit with another probably bigger star. They orbit each other and the neutron star absorbs some energy.Which is what happening here.(Well, thats what the universe tells me.

[rogerfraserr]

I was wondering. If a black hole had 3 solar masses, and a companion star had 15 solar masses, which one would rotate around the other?

[kingpumkinjack]

non would rotate round any one the black hole would suck up everything around it even light and nothingness!

[Beefstew2011]

It doesnt matter the total mass, its the mass density which takes up space, which, essentially the 3 solar masses of the Black Hole take up virtually no space or a quantized space, thus resulting in an almost infinitely dense celestial body. Yes, the star would rotate the Black Hole.

[rogerfraserr]

thanks

[kimailis]

in the beginning, but then the star would be fully absorbed into the gas disc that rotates around the black hole.

[rezomatic]

wrong. They actually BOTH rotate about the center of mass of the two. In this case, the center of mass would be mostly inside the heavier one and it would appear to be stationary with a slight "wobble"

[ingance]

run away! :(  then black hole say's "next!"

[tim2421]

there goes us

[Wheeeeeeeee46]

Yes, I see. It's Pwetty

[sexquadragintilliona]

It depends on the distance. At a certain distance far, it's the same as a normal star the same mass, but a certain distance CLOSE, the gravity is stronger. In fact, if the neutron star has a red giant companion, the gravity would pull matter from the giant. A disc forms around the neutron star. Matter hits so hard, it spins up the neutron star like when you hit a tether ball. The neutron star becomes a pulsar. Some spin over 100x a second, but the fastest one known spins 1,122 times a second.

[feichen1997]

is a neutron star gravity stronger than a normal star?

[AnduinX]

The gravity on the surface of a neutron star is far higher than the gravity on the surface of a normal star. Surface gravity is based on the density of the object.

[AnduinX]

For example if a regular star was one million miles in diameter, that means it's center of gravity is ~500,000 miles away from the surface (not exactly, there are variations, but generally speaking). A neutron star with the same amount of mass as that star would be roughly 10 miles in diameter.

[AnduinX]

As I understand it, this means if that neutron star was 500,000 miles away from the surface of the regular star the neutron star would exert the same gravitational pull on the surface of the star as the star's gravity exerts on it. If the neutron star got closer, it's gravitational pull on the surface matter of the regular star would be stronger than the regular star, thus it would rip the surface matter off of the star and suck it in.

[AnduinX]

The center of the regular star would be roughly one million miles away from the neutron star, and a neutron star 10 miles in diameter's center would only be 5 miles away. Thus, even if the star is of equal matter to the neutron star it wouldn't even come close to ripping any matter off of the neutron star. The neutron star would tear it to pieces.

[RayquazaKing99]

well yer