i like the part of the capsule glided down on what its fucking wings it would have fallen like a brick in 1/6 gravtiy with out an exaust that was equal to its wieght there fore producin a crater no matter how big or small a crater of some sort would have been there at least the dust blown away like it shows in the landing video dust blowing across the surface
Dude, the moon is a reflective surface. flat white is the most reflective surface there is, I learned this in studying hydroponics. Thanks for your comment.
My theory is. The government wants everyone to think that the moon landing is fake. Because they decided that they didn't want the world knowing that we could make it to the moon. Why!!!! Because they are building a space station on the dark side of the moon. And they've been building it since 1969. They probably got a small city build by now.
And what if you can't see the stars in the day time on the moon because the suns so bright. Maybe the only way you can see stars is if you go to the dark side of the moon.
Snapping pictures of the sky in the same kind of location as the HOAX, with artificial lighting will give the same fucking results. They only told on themselves that the shit was done on earth, it looks exactly the same, WTF, LMAO!!!! It doesn't prove shit, but those fucking clowns are str8 liars. The moon has no atmosphere that is the whole point why people with some fucking sense is disputing on about the stars. NASA has proven that they can photograph and video stars, case closed, HOAX...
conspiracy theorists point to the footage of the apollo astronauts faking the shot of the earth from inside the space capsule as proof that the moon landings were bullshit...
@TheChineseEmpire Care to actually cite how it's evidence? Just saying so, and laughing, is not how adults discuss things, but more suited to a child.
Neil Armstong said it was up to the next generations to unveil "truths protective layers". Could that protective later be the national security act which contains the truth about the alleged moon landings? For a man that was 1st to land on the moon he has rarely gave a public interview and muffed up about stars. Perhaps he never went... Why not tell the truth - the cold war is over.
@TheChineseEmpire So your evidence consists of interpreting a quote by Armstrong as you see fit? Get a grip! You are embarrassing. Your school system must suck if it turned out someone like you.
@yaluobud No, "glide" means to "move with a smooth, continuous motion". It doesn't require atmosphere, wings, or anything else. Please at least try to understand the words you use before showing everyone you are so ignorant.
They attempted to debunk the theory that the photos were taken here on Earth as to why we can't see the stars... but they way they did it was by taking a picture of the sky from here on Earth? Of course you won't see stars in the new photos, because they were both done here on Earth!
And the shadows show up on different angles because of a close light source not because of multiple light sources. The sun is an extremely distant light source.
The readings from the Glast Burst Monitor will put this whole debate to rest. Galactic cosmic rays are the reason we never went anywhere above 350 miles above the earth. Readings from the GBM on any day or time: 10 billion million electron volts 1e+10 MeV. No one survives exposure from that amount of energy for a second. One second exposure to that much energy to any part of your body equals death in about 30 minutes. Go check the Glast Burst Monitor if you don't believe me about the readings.
the weight on the moon is 1/6 that on earth. if you want to shoot a satellite into orbit, you need massive rockets on earth. to return to earth, you need 1/6 that of massive rockets which is still very massive. look at 8:42, i don't see any massive rockets 1/6 the size that of earth rockets. that gay little round drum of fuel can only roast some stupid guy's ass, not enough to return earth. don't be a fucking dumb ass.
@rickylain We need massive rockets mainly because the craft have to power through lots of dense atmosphere. Please just think for a second, then speak, otherwise you end up looking really foolish, as you just have.
@blehblehbleh90 have you actually look up escape velocity from wikipedia? the escape velocity has little to do with air drag. the escape velocity from the earth is 11.2 km/s, and the escape velocity from the moon is 2.4 km/s, about 1/6 that of the earth. you just claim yourself to be a dumb ass.
@rickylain Clearly you haven't looked it up, as escape velocity has nothing to do with powered craft, yet you claim it does. The wiki page even has a section titled "misconception", which explains how you are wrong. You can leave Earth travelling at 1 MPH if you could just maintain it. Escape velocity is the speed something needs to travel to leave a gravitational field *without further propulsion*. You clearly know nothing about this. Why you think you do is beyond me. Thanks for playing.
@blehblehbleh90 what don't you do 1 mph and leave earth. its seems like all scientists around the world are obviously stupid and don't know anything. the massive rockets are just for TV shows. look, i'm just telling you the technical difficulties to make everything work. if you insist that everything is easy, there's nothing more i need to say. if people want to believe that reindeers start to fly when christmas comes, so be it.
@rickylain Wow. Please tell me why something moving at a constant 1mph won't move at 1mph, because that's all I'm saying. Escape velocity is for unpowered craft, not powered ones. Yes, rockets are needed as mankind doesn't know how to build something that can move at a given speed for the distance required to reach orbit. Your reading comprehension seems as lacking as your science education.
The camera could not eventually take pictures with the stars, but the astronauts should be able to see them - it was just enough to direct the sight to the lunar azimuth.
Basically, the criss cross markers on the film appears on the landscape but is absent on the dark background...and IT'S NOT THAT THEY FAKED THE LANDING, BUT THAT ON THE ORIGINAL PRINTS ARE VISIBLE ANCIENT ALIEN ARCHITECTURES.
If they could go to the moon they would have militarized it long ago. They never talk about the amount of radiation outside the protective atmosphere of the Earth. Today we have access to telescope technology that can see the surface of the moon close up. I say make them put a big black circle or something that can be seen from earth on the moon surface and end all this controversy. But they won't because Govt. wants everything vague so they can continue doing secret things,
@timothywiesner Dude, there is already a mirror on the moon they use lasers to measure its distance and that's how we know it is moving away from the earth very slowly. Google "Lunar Laser Ranging experiment"
THE POINT IS THAT ITS ALL FAKE!!! AND IT WAS JUST ANOTHER WAY TO SCAM RUSSIANS AND PRETEND THAT THEY DID SOMETHING EVEN BETTER THAN JUST GO TO OUTER SPACE!!! THEY COULDNT COME UP WITH SOMETHING PROPER SO THEY MADA THAT FAKE LANDING AND EVEN SOMEHOW I CAN SEE THAT GUY WHO LANDED ON WIKIPEDIA!!! ITS ALREADY SAYS LONG TIME AGO THAT ITS ALL FAKE, SO WHY PUT THAT ARMSTONG LANDED ON THE MOON/??? LOL THEY MAKING CONFUSE EVERYONE!!!
@TheJomogogo If theres no dangerous radiation, why does the ISS have to shut down most of its systems FIVE times a day when they pass through the South Atlantic Anomaly, which is the lowest part of the Magnetosphere? Scheduled maintenance perhaps?
Please display your superior knowledge by answering the question...........if you can.
If NASA can send up tens to hundreds of satellites per year (yes they ARE up there, communications wouldn't be the same without them) with only 0.5% of the national budget, how hard can it be to send a manned mission to the moon or two with a full 5%?
obviously not hard at all...but if someone were to give me a billion dollars for something i could replicate in a movie studio for ten thousand bucks or less, you bet your ass i'd put that money in my pocket..as did they..its not about the technology..its about human nature..there is absolutely no reason for the government to spend that much money to go to the moon,when governments go to war..
their public relations departments always go on and on about how its for justice and honor,democracy,preserving their way of life,fighting against evil and terror..but its really because the other side has something that'll make them super rich..weather they admit it or not its never out of the goodness of their hearts..and the thousands of satelites out there generate trillions of dollars for them(thats a whole lotta chedar) but to pony up that kinda cash just for a few rocks...
...these are still the same greedy old bastards running the show and they are still smart enough not invest in something that won't make them 10 times as rich in return..the only way people are going on the moon is if they discover that its made from 80% petrolium
The Van Allen belts were traversed 18 times between 1968 & 1972 counting the trips out and back on the Apollo lunar missions. The Van Allen Belts are no "barrier". they are charged particels. A satellite shielded by 3 mm of aluminium in an elliptic orbit passing through the radiation belts will receive about 2,500 rem (25 Sv) per year. The astronauts received on average less than 1 rem (10 mSv), which is equivalent to the ambient radiation received by living at sea level for three years.
You hoaxers are retarded beyond belief. The evidence for a legitimate landing is irrefutable. If you believe otherwise you are totally superfluous and should kill yourself immediately.
@redryan5048 I hate to break it to you. But that was just a movie. Fictitious. But you guys have difficulty distinguishing fact from fiction don't you.
@YaMumYaNanYaGran The hoaxers aren't out to disprove the Lunar landings to you, but to your children. I'd make inquiries into what your kids' teachers are saying about the Apollo missions. I don't contend it the hoaxers are part of a deliberate disinformation campaign, but it is symptomatic of a rising anti-American sentiment. First order of business for them is to attack national pride.
(6:25+) this guy didn't even take in to account the extreme temperature changes on the moon that can be over and or negative 100C, which would of destroyed any kind of film/camera, not to mention the fact that ultra violent rays which would of tampered with color and distortion.
People can't go past the Van Allen Belt or they will die from radiation. The moon is out side of the Van Allen Belt. It's that simple. The moon landings never happened. They were faked. If you want to believe the moon landing deceptions, go ahead and be deceived.
@zhedron "the outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage." Professor Van Alllen
You really believe you know more about the Van Allen belt than Van Allen himself?
@WillShakespeare2007 - The moon landings never happened. See YouTube /watch?v=KVb3cOE9orQ and watch?v=y1tqZyZVoDM and watch?v=2_JzBkgdX8Q This video is evidence that Dr James van Allen was convinced in 1968 that the Apollo 8 crew Would be fried. They weren't fried because they never went through the VAB. They faked it.
@zhedron Seriously you want me to look through an hour of footage to find this quote. Please send me the actual video and the minute where the quote is for Dr Van Allen. Sorry but I have seen these kind of videos a thousand times and NASA has answered every point made a thousand times. So I really only want to see this quote as I have never seen this. Thanks.
i figured this out alone in 3rd grade: there is no stars because the exposure time of the camera is too low, to see stars they would need to use a longer exposure time causing too much light to go on the film, they didnt need that much exposure
Isn't it strange when Patrick Moore asks about the stars they all are fiddling with their pens - they look scared to death! Quite a simple question but a very fumbling answer.
I'm an engineer and not interrested in illuminati etc. but my view has recently changed on the moonlandings. I have studied the footage and many pictures for some weeks now. They didn't go.
Jesus, why??? I still can't believe it but the evidence forces me to reject the "we went to the moon" story.
@losability They went there.The faked pictures come from an other project of NASA called 'Simulation of the landing on Moon'.The tests and the simulation took place at the mountains and deserts of USA and that's why so many 'faked' photos....There are some endurances of people who want the government and other institutions to stop to budget the projects of NASA.
@uboot1967 you're not fooling me just yourself. Wrong pictures have been shown since 1969 in magazines, books and newspapers. i have decided not to trust the evidence until examined very closely: i have been fooled for more than 40 yrs.
all you people think this is fake what do u think nasa did send a space shuttle in the sky and just flown it somewere and landed it the did the same thing to get back and also what do u think thay spent millions of dollars on a hammer and nails no not realy this is not fake and also mythbusters proved it the flag will still move in zero gravity all u people are in denial
I still dont buy this bullshit...they never landed on the moon...the illuminatti controls everything & we as a people must rise up & fight them I just hope im either dead when they get what they want or its not to late when people finally see & decide to stop whats going on...
they went there 6 times apollo 17 being the last,the flag waves simply due to force and no atmospheric constraints,simple to understand if your not compleatly brain dead,plus the lander rocket just blew the dust,lunar regolith is mostly glass not rock that old bastard needs puttin in a home
Patrick Moore is wrong, they would have been able to see the stars if they simply did not look at the surface and looked outward. Yes it is that simple, forget the optics comment that is just a red herring.
Sorry space cadets but little Jay not being truthful, his flag is a completely different type of material, probably supplied by NASA with the dodgy cement dust. And the guy at 4:10 is actually telling the truth
Let him believe what he wants...Here's the thing though...they did not ignore anything at all in the next few minutes when the video showed the interview.
i like the part of the capsule glided down on what its fucking wings it would have fallen like a brick in 1/6 gravtiy with out an exaust that was equal to its wieght there fore producin a crater no matter how big or small a crater of some sort would have been there at least the dust blown away like it shows in the landing video dust blowing across the surface
haydenmossop 2 days ago
Dude, the moon is a reflective surface. flat white is the most reflective surface there is, I learned this in studying hydroponics. Thanks for your comment.
timothywiesner 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
My theory is. The government wants everyone to think that the moon landing is fake. Because they decided that they didn't want the world knowing that we could make it to the moon. Why!!!! Because they are building a space station on the dark side of the moon. And they've been building it since 1969. They probably got a small city build by now.
JokeRtheJakeR 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
And what if you can't see the stars in the day time on the moon because the suns so bright. Maybe the only way you can see stars is if you go to the dark side of the moon.
JokeRtheJakeR 3 months ago
Snapping pictures of the sky in the same kind of location as the HOAX, with artificial lighting will give the same fucking results. They only told on themselves that the shit was done on earth, it looks exactly the same, WTF, LMAO!!!! It doesn't prove shit, but those fucking clowns are str8 liars. The moon has no atmosphere that is the whole point why people with some fucking sense is disputing on about the stars. NASA has proven that they can photograph and video stars, case closed, HOAX...
GUARDIANtrooper 4 months ago
conspiracy theorists point to the footage of the apollo astronauts faking the shot of the earth from inside the space capsule as proof that the moon landings were bullshit...
aikidoisthebombyeah 4 months ago in playlist More videos from ClactonRadio
This video was more proof that it was fake lol. They should have just shut up.
TheChineseEmpire 5 months ago
@TheChineseEmpire -- There is not even any evidence, let alone "proof" that it was faked.
All the so-called "evidence" of a hoax is fairly easilly proven to be fraudulent.
But you have to be able (and willing) to think for yourself and not just be a sheep following the hoax-theory promoters.
prosperomage 4 months ago
@TheChineseEmpire Care to actually cite how it's evidence? Just saying so, and laughing, is not how adults discuss things, but more suited to a child.
blehblehbleh90 4 months ago
Neil Armstong said it was up to the next generations to unveil "truths protective layers". Could that protective later be the national security act which contains the truth about the alleged moon landings? For a man that was 1st to land on the moon he has rarely gave a public interview and muffed up about stars. Perhaps he never went... Why not tell the truth - the cold war is over.
TheChineseEmpire 5 months ago
@TheChineseEmpire So your evidence consists of interpreting a quote by Armstrong as you see fit? Get a grip! You are embarrassing. Your school system must suck if it turned out someone like you.
blehblehbleh90 4 months ago
How could the LM glide you moron, it would need wings and an atmosphere.
yaluobud 6 months ago
@yaluobud No, "glide" means to "move with a smooth, continuous motion". It doesn't require atmosphere, wings, or anything else. Please at least try to understand the words you use before showing everyone you are so ignorant.
blehblehbleh90 4 months ago
Let me get this straight...
They attempted to debunk the theory that the photos were taken here on Earth as to why we can't see the stars... but they way they did it was by taking a picture of the sky from here on Earth? Of course you won't see stars in the new photos, because they were both done here on Earth!
And the shadows show up on different angles because of a close light source not because of multiple light sources. The sun is an extremely distant light source.
Loominus8 6 months ago
EUA = FAKENESS
goncalocard 6 months ago
The readings from the Glast Burst Monitor will put this whole debate to rest. Galactic cosmic rays are the reason we never went anywhere above 350 miles above the earth. Readings from the GBM on any day or time: 10 billion million electron volts 1e+10 MeV. No one survives exposure from that amount of energy for a second. One second exposure to that much energy to any part of your body equals death in about 30 minutes. Go check the Glast Burst Monitor if you don't believe me about the readings.
Daddyo930 6 months ago
the weight on the moon is 1/6 that on earth. if you want to shoot a satellite into orbit, you need massive rockets on earth. to return to earth, you need 1/6 that of massive rockets which is still very massive. look at 8:42, i don't see any massive rockets 1/6 the size that of earth rockets. that gay little round drum of fuel can only roast some stupid guy's ass, not enough to return earth. don't be a fucking dumb ass.
rickylain 6 months ago
@rickylain We need massive rockets mainly because the craft have to power through lots of dense atmosphere. Please just think for a second, then speak, otherwise you end up looking really foolish, as you just have.
blehblehbleh90 4 months ago
@blehblehbleh90 have you actually look up escape velocity from wikipedia? the escape velocity has little to do with air drag. the escape velocity from the earth is 11.2 km/s, and the escape velocity from the moon is 2.4 km/s, about 1/6 that of the earth. you just claim yourself to be a dumb ass.
rickylain 4 months ago
@rickylain Clearly you haven't looked it up, as escape velocity has nothing to do with powered craft, yet you claim it does. The wiki page even has a section titled "misconception", which explains how you are wrong. You can leave Earth travelling at 1 MPH if you could just maintain it. Escape velocity is the speed something needs to travel to leave a gravitational field *without further propulsion*. You clearly know nothing about this. Why you think you do is beyond me. Thanks for playing.
blehblehbleh90 4 months ago
@blehblehbleh90 what don't you do 1 mph and leave earth. its seems like all scientists around the world are obviously stupid and don't know anything. the massive rockets are just for TV shows. look, i'm just telling you the technical difficulties to make everything work. if you insist that everything is easy, there's nothing more i need to say. if people want to believe that reindeers start to fly when christmas comes, so be it.
rickylain 3 months ago
@rickylain Wow. Please tell me why something moving at a constant 1mph won't move at 1mph, because that's all I'm saying. Escape velocity is for unpowered craft, not powered ones. Yes, rockets are needed as mankind doesn't know how to build something that can move at a given speed for the distance required to reach orbit. Your reading comprehension seems as lacking as your science education.
blehblehbleh90 3 months ago
who shot the moon landing?
bumblebuck 7 months ago
The camera could not eventually take pictures with the stars, but the astronauts should be able to see them - it was just enough to direct the sight to the lunar azimuth.
Reasonable99pct 7 months ago
Comment removed
kiwig0nefresh 8 months ago
the dark background:
Basically, the criss cross markers on the film appears on the landscape but is absent on the dark background...and IT'S NOT THAT THEY FAKED THE LANDING, BUT THAT ON THE ORIGINAL PRINTS ARE VISIBLE ANCIENT ALIEN ARCHITECTURES.
novanine9 8 months ago
WE WENT THERE! GET OVER IT! MOVE ON
RxUxKIDDINGxME 8 months ago
@RxUxKIDDINGxME I'm sorry,but we didn't :(
bumblebuck 7 months ago
Americans pay for NASA and they get shafted by NASA.
only lies for the American people
but the American people deserve lies they are too stupid to grasp the truth
dave777blaster 9 months ago
@dave777blaster lol You idiot, your country is in on it as well. WAKE UP!! Illuminati controls the world, not just America!!
Mr2StrokeBEAST 7 months ago
@Mr2StrokeBEAST
Are you one of those 'twoofers', puking nonsense around about NWO, Freemasons and Illuminati?
LOL
Rob260259 7 months ago 2
@Rob260259
What Rob? Go read a book. Go back to school or something. Please.
Mr2StrokeBEAST 7 months ago
@Mr2StrokeBEAST
Thank you for acknowledgement.
Rob260259 7 months ago
@Rob260259
Any time Bud.
Mr2StrokeBEAST 7 months ago
@Mr2StrokeBEAST
Bud? Budweiser is like water.
Rob260259 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Rob260259 Your barking at the moon again Rob, you '18 men went to the moon and back' believing barking mad lunatics.
WOOF WOOF!
;)
Kenmorfdublin 7 months ago
Can't get past van allen radiation belts..........PERIOD
WONDOCTORJ 9 months ago
@WONDOCTORJ There's one person in particlar who said that astronauts could easily get past the van Allen belts. His name? van Allen.
BertieSlack 7 months ago
@BertieSlack Great, then show me a close up of the landing site. Oh wait, 2011 telescopes can't see that far.....NOT.
WONDOCTORJ 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@WONDOCTORJ "then show me a close up of the landing site"
Here it is, taken by LRO:
watch?v=ul87ieOZpaQ&feature=channel_video_title
BertieSlack 7 months ago
@BertieSlack Lying again Bertie I see.
Have some self-respect you blathering troll.
Kenmorfdublin 7 months ago
i have one question:
if it was a fake, really nasa did not think about the crater that the eagle would have produced on the moon surface?
I mean... thinking like someone who wants to fake the moon landing, i would have thought about all details...at least the "most visible" ones.
I don't know what to think
tydra74 9 months ago
If they could go to the moon they would have militarized it long ago. They never talk about the amount of radiation outside the protective atmosphere of the Earth. Today we have access to telescope technology that can see the surface of the moon close up. I say make them put a big black circle or something that can be seen from earth on the moon surface and end all this controversy. But they won't because Govt. wants everything vague so they can continue doing secret things,
timothywiesner 9 months ago 2
@timothywiesner Dude, there is already a mirror on the moon they use lasers to measure its distance and that's how we know it is moving away from the earth very slowly. Google "Lunar Laser Ranging experiment"
bamboo4tameshigiri 3 months ago
hahaha they USA NEVER went to the moon, they USA orchestated the 9/11, they USA orchestates all wars in the world, USA are the big lie of the world.
loombaron 10 months ago
THE POINT IS THAT ITS ALL FAKE!!! AND IT WAS JUST ANOTHER WAY TO SCAM RUSSIANS AND PRETEND THAT THEY DID SOMETHING EVEN BETTER THAN JUST GO TO OUTER SPACE!!! THEY COULDNT COME UP WITH SOMETHING PROPER SO THEY MADA THAT FAKE LANDING AND EVEN SOMEHOW I CAN SEE THAT GUY WHO LANDED ON WIKIPEDIA!!! ITS ALREADY SAYS LONG TIME AGO THAT ITS ALL FAKE, SO WHY PUT THAT ARMSTONG LANDED ON THE MOON/??? LOL THEY MAKING CONFUSE EVERYONE!!!
ukrainevladcanada 10 months ago
No fogging on the film either! Through the VAB, there, back through the VAB and the film is fine. LOL err... yeah ok.
kaderoder 11 months ago
Comment removed
TheJomogogo 10 months ago
@TheJomogogo If theres no dangerous radiation, why does the ISS have to shut down most of its systems FIVE times a day when they pass through the South Atlantic Anomaly, which is the lowest part of the Magnetosphere? Scheduled maintenance perhaps?
Please display your superior knowledge by answering the question...........if you can.
kaderoder 10 months ago
Comment removed
TheJomogogo 10 months ago
@TheJomogogo Thankyou for displaying your intelligence, and proving my point.
kaderoder 10 months ago
Why this lie????
blurgirl365 11 months ago
If NASA can send up tens to hundreds of satellites per year (yes they ARE up there, communications wouldn't be the same without them) with only 0.5% of the national budget, how hard can it be to send a manned mission to the moon or two with a full 5%?
MichaelCox 1 year ago
obviously not hard at all...but if someone were to give me a billion dollars for something i could replicate in a movie studio for ten thousand bucks or less, you bet your ass i'd put that money in my pocket..as did they..its not about the technology..its about human nature..there is absolutely no reason for the government to spend that much money to go to the moon,when governments go to war..
kickassrockafella28 11 months ago
their public relations departments always go on and on about how its for justice and honor,democracy,preserving their way of life,fighting against evil and terror..but its really because the other side has something that'll make them super rich..weather they admit it or not its never out of the goodness of their hearts..and the thousands of satelites out there generate trillions of dollars for them(thats a whole lotta chedar) but to pony up that kinda cash just for a few rocks...
kickassrockafella28 11 months ago
...these are still the same greedy old bastards running the show and they are still smart enough not invest in something that won't make them 10 times as rich in return..the only way people are going on the moon is if they discover that its made from 80% petrolium
kickassrockafella28 11 months ago
BULLSHIT.
USAForLife2057 1 year ago
uhh excuse me, i count 50 stars in this picture :)
codyahernek 1 year ago
The Van Allen belts were traversed 18 times between 1968 & 1972 counting the trips out and back on the Apollo lunar missions. The Van Allen Belts are no "barrier". they are charged particels. A satellite shielded by 3 mm of aluminium in an elliptic orbit passing through the radiation belts will receive about 2,500 rem (25 Sv) per year. The astronauts received on average less than 1 rem (10 mSv), which is equivalent to the ambient radiation received by living at sea level for three years.
Synthetrix 1 year ago
You hoaxers are retarded beyond belief. The evidence for a legitimate landing is irrefutable. If you believe otherwise you are totally superfluous and should kill yourself immediately.
YaMumYaNanYaGran 1 year ago
@YaMumYaNanYaGran
I also watched bruce willis drill through a meteor before it hit earth..................
Don't be so sleepy.......
redryan5048 1 year ago
@redryan5048 I hate to break it to you. But that was just a movie. Fictitious. But you guys have difficulty distinguishing fact from fiction don't you.
YaMumYaNanYaGran 1 year ago
@YaMumYaNanYaGran The hoaxers aren't out to disprove the Lunar landings to you, but to your children. I'd make inquiries into what your kids' teachers are saying about the Apollo missions. I don't contend it the hoaxers are part of a deliberate disinformation campaign, but it is symptomatic of a rising anti-American sentiment. First order of business for them is to attack national pride.
Purpleplanetar17 1 year ago
(6:25+) this guy didn't even take in to account the extreme temperature changes on the moon that can be over and or negative 100C, which would of destroyed any kind of film/camera, not to mention the fact that ultra violent rays which would of tampered with color and distortion.
bullpuckee 1 year ago
these "officials" they have talking look fake as hell
catra195 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You are too lazy to look at the evidence?
zhedron 1 year ago
People can't go past the Van Allen Belt or they will die from radiation. The moon is out side of the Van Allen Belt. It's that simple. The moon landings never happened. They were faked. If you want to believe the moon landing deceptions, go ahead and be deceived.
zhedron 1 year ago
@zhedron "the outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage." Professor Van Alllen
You really believe you know more about the Van Allen belt than Van Allen himself?
WillShakespeare2007 1 year ago
@WillShakespeare2007 - The moon landings never happened. See YouTube /watch?v=KVb3cOE9orQ and watch?v=y1tqZyZVoDM and watch?v=2_JzBkgdX8Q This video is evidence that Dr James van Allen was convinced in 1968 that the Apollo 8 crew Would be fried. They weren't fried because they never went through the VAB. They faked it.
zhedron 1 year ago
@zhedron Seriously you want me to look through an hour of footage to find this quote. Please send me the actual video and the minute where the quote is for Dr Van Allen. Sorry but I have seen these kind of videos a thousand times and NASA has answered every point made a thousand times. So I really only want to see this quote as I have never seen this. Thanks.
WillShakespeare2007 1 year ago
i figured this out alone in 3rd grade: there is no stars because the exposure time of the camera is too low, to see stars they would need to use a longer exposure time causing too much light to go on the film, they didnt need that much exposure
dwarfer777 1 year ago
oh man so on a cloudy night you snap photos and dont see stars big deal. how about a clear night that you can see stars. lets see that test.
datzfast 1 year ago
26 leaf blowers will produce about 50 lbs of thrust and thats all. not the three thousand needed to hover at the surface
datzfast 1 year ago
Who was walking UNDER the Moon Lander!?....Why are there perfect footprints under the Lander??..I never noticed those before.
BrodyLuv2 1 year ago
the moon landing was filmed in area 51
khalid6591 1 year ago
5:44 how he lives on ther moon without a suit? uh? or its fake.
sofia739 1 year ago
Isn't it strange when Patrick Moore asks about the stars they all are fiddling with their pens - they look scared to death! Quite a simple question but a very fumbling answer.
paulreno1 1 year ago
To the Moon Alice! LOL
NoNORADon911 1 year ago
NASA=NAZI
purplefetus3 1 year ago
@purplefetus3 Why????
uboot1967 1 year ago
I'm an engineer and not interrested in illuminati etc. but my view has recently changed on the moonlandings. I have studied the footage and many pictures for some weeks now. They didn't go.
Jesus, why??? I still can't believe it but the evidence forces me to reject the "we went to the moon" story.
losability 1 year ago
@losability They went there.The faked pictures come from an other project of NASA called 'Simulation of the landing on Moon'.The tests and the simulation took place at the mountains and deserts of USA and that's why so many 'faked' photos....There are some endurances of people who want the government and other institutions to stop to budget the projects of NASA.
uboot1967 1 year ago
@uboot1967 if they went then why did they show us the wrong pictures and films? Is it not far simpler to admit they didn't go?
losability 1 year ago
@losability NASA doesn't show to you wrong pictures.....In youtube everybody has the right to upload everything......
uboot1967 1 year ago
@uboot1967 you're not fooling me just yourself. Wrong pictures have been shown since 1969 in magazines, books and newspapers. i have decided not to trust the evidence until examined very closely: i have been fooled for more than 40 yrs.
losability 1 year ago
@losability Did you know the project 'Simulation of Apollo landing'?
That project was developed by NASA in a studio to simulate the landing of Apollo....
As you understand,the 'fake' photos and videos are real...but not from the moon.After a few months the landing on moon was true.
uboot1967 1 year ago
Ralph Rene and Bill Kaysing... if those two represent the main proponents of the hoax theory, then we landed on the moon...
lukequixotesanjose 1 year ago
No wonder these Conspiracy Experts live in trailers!
Warthog1976 1 year ago
Apollo 15 flag is moving?
awe130 1 year ago
@awe130 because the momentum keeps the flag moving for a few seconds
sgh95 1 year ago
all you people think this is fake what do u think nasa did send a space shuttle in the sky and just flown it somewere and landed it the did the same thing to get back and also what do u think thay spent millions of dollars on a hammer and nails no not realy this is not fake and also mythbusters proved it the flag will still move in zero gravity all u people are in denial
reptilieguy 1 year ago
The "lessened thrust" of the spaceship motors was STILL more than the hand held blower in the demonstration in the gravel pit. Nice try!
olga2415 1 year ago
I still dont buy this bullshit...they never landed on the moon...the illuminatti controls everything & we as a people must rise up & fight them I just hope im either dead when they get what they want or its not to late when people finally see & decide to stop whats going on...
JonTheProdogy 1 year ago
Ralph Rene is my favourite comedian.
TremorHellborn 2 years ago
The guy with the blower, he is using a focussed air very close to the ground at an angle of about 45 degree.
The lunar lander rocket was higer, the exhaust was spread at an 85 angle pointing almost directly down so reducing sideways force on the ground
obaeyens 2 years ago
i'm sorry but how can people buy the moon landings were faked! THINK what next 9/11 was faked by the government oh.....
richy0o0o0 2 years ago
@richy0o0o0 bahhhh, bahhhh black sheep. lol
olga2415 1 year ago
they went there 6 times apollo 17 being the last,the flag waves simply due to force and no atmospheric constraints,simple to understand if your not compleatly brain dead,plus the lander rocket just blew the dust,lunar regolith is mostly glass not rock that old bastard needs puttin in a home
guitarnashelter 2 years ago
Patrick Moore is wrong, they would have been able to see the stars if they simply did not look at the surface and looked outward. Yes it is that simple, forget the optics comment that is just a red herring.
guesser7 2 years ago
Hey another small detail Mr Oberg is that the flag does move when he walks past it
guesser7 2 years ago
Sorry space cadets but little Jay not being truthful, his flag is a completely different type of material, probably supplied by NASA with the dodgy cement dust. And the guy at 4:10 is actually telling the truth
guesser7 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APOLLO MISSIONS FAKEd
humanmonkeyworld 2 years ago 3
@humanmonkeyworld ur retarded LOL watch mythbusters they will tell all u dumb pieces of shit that obviously dont understand science
hotboy117 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nasa are Nazi Lying Scum
humanmonkeyworld 2 years ago 3
@humanmonkeyworld Not only Nasa, but also Mythbusters who participate in this giant scam.
Vagextrol 1 year ago
tu que ere tu ? un pajarito tu ?
EstrellaPolux 2 years ago
the guy at 4:10 deserves to die.
WTFxxPRODUCTIONS 2 years ago
Let him believe what he wants...Here's the thing though...they did not ignore anything at all in the next few minutes when the video showed the interview.
cptsniper 2 years ago
not as much as jay windley
xismxist 2 years ago
@WTFxxPRODUCTIONS He already has.
mercatormac 2 years ago