Shouldn't they be turning the pages on their scores? Looks like they play it completely by heart. I want to practice this one would be a good filler after playing the Goldberg Variations. Oh just half way through 3:42, 4:35 - I didn't know before it it actually had 3 movements? I think it might be more interesting to see with an audience that doesn't know the piece as the reaction of the audience is the most important part of the audible aspects of this piece.
I love that there's a "Guest Violinist". Do you think he got paid Musicians' Union scale for the gig? For that matter, does John Cage's estate receive a royalty payment every time 4:33 is "performed"? If somebody else released a silent piece, can Cage's estate sue them? These are the questions I ponder late at night when sleep won't come.
John Cage was a student of Schoenberg, but will never have the same musical talent as him. 4"33 is simply a joke, Cage said there will always be sounds, there is never perfect silence, so why make a piece that tries so hard to be silent?
and wtf is with 'guest violinist' in this example? they still do NOTHING, it doesn't take talent to replicate this piece.
Well, some songs are just one big waterfall that keep comming. Some songs use the silence between the notes. Now someone made a piece with complete silence, and a lot of (narrow minded, i think) people start complaining. But when a piece of music is one big waterfall of sound, you hear them praise the composer. Perhaps the just don't understand the sound of silence.
I know, I've been trying to get my book published, but no one has the balls to publish it because it has no "words", "pages" or "cover". They just don't get it.
You don't read much, do you? There actually is a book without words, only blanc pages. Unfortunately, I can't remember the title of the book (yes, it has one). What I can remember, is a book by W.F. Hermans that just stops in the middle of the story, in the middle of the sentence, followed by a few blanc pages. Quite interesting if you understand the philosophy behind it.
Kanye West wrote a book with blank (or "blanc", looks like you don't read much, huh?) pages in it. Any talentless hack can bullshit their way to success so long as there are pretentious idiots who want to tell other people "oh, you just don't get it."
Sorry about the misspelling, I read in French, English, Dutch and German, so sometimes an err sneaks in, especially with those annoying capitals...
Anyway, John Cage is not a random "talentless hack". He does have quite a reputation, especially in the aleatoric music. I can't say I can appreciate his works, but to let the audience be the music in the piece... Let's say I like the idea. After all, he is the famous and influential pioneer in the avant-garde.
John Cage is not avant-garde. He is main stream establishment. Avant-garde would be something that is going AGAINST the trend, something experimental/innovative, not something the establishment embraces. Now if Cage were to suddenly write something that instantly captivated the public, the way say Mozart or Beethoven did over 200 years ago, that really WOULD be avant-garde today, but 4'33" is firmly establishment stuff, as promoted every day by the BBC and other main stream organisations.
dont know if he is an avant-garde but clearly he is a mix between aleatory and integral serialism... and that mix gives him kinda the stamp `Post Modern´ right? and post modernists embraces technology and mainstream no?
And at the time this was performed, his intention was to experiment with both Zen enlightment and creating a notion on the ambient sound around us..
No really: "creating a notion on the ambient sound around us" Couldn't have said it better. If this "song" included any Zen enlightment, I don't know. Sounds pretty accepteble though.
really funny, I am writing an essay about post modernism :P but didnt use wikipedia though, not reliable according to good old Harvard Refrencing *geek*
Of course there are parts of various pieces of music that have silence, but just because silence can be in a piece of music, it doesn't make it music. It's like- you can have a peanut in a candy bar, but having a peanut isn't the same as having a candy bar.
This is not music. You cannot take credit for sounds that you did not create. The chirping of crickets or the hum of an air conditioner is not your invention, therefore, calling the sounds surrounding your piece "yours" is fucking selfish, not to mention idiotic.
Fail? On what scale? I think it's a pleasant comment on overlooked beauty- calling the hacking and stifled sniffling of an audience member music, music being one of the pinnacles of beauty.
what the hell????? i dont get it :S...they didnt even play an instrument...on one of the comments down there it says " guitar needed to play louder" there was no guitar ffs!!!!
Music is a combination of sound and silence at different proportions. This is the height of emotional music. If you sat there wandering what was happening you need to learn how to listen to music.
Music is an art form whose medium is sound organized in time. Common elements of music are pitch (which governs melody and harmony), rhythm (and its associated concepts tempo, meter, and articulation), dynamics, and the sonic qualities of timbre and texture.
i think that we should just agree that everyone has their own mind and thier own opinion on this, in my opinion this is not music and infact if i was sat there in the audience i would laugh my ars off , i mean would you realy pay to go and sit there while someone was just standing there haha, anyway sojio i respect your opinon even though it is far different from mine :)
another part of the piece is how the audience reacts to sitting in silence for four and a half minutes. it's called experimental music because you don't know exactly how it will turn out.
it's called chance music. Music that could happen. music that is made up from any sound. whether it be the laughter of the audience or the fly on the wall
So what? Why would you go to a concert to see people perform it when you can sit at home, go to the woods, and sit and listen to "chance" music? I appreciate music that shows a mood - a feeling or emotion. I find it extremely difficult to get any of that from a concert band standing on stage doing nothing. And if there is any type of emotion evoked, its nothing I can't experience on my own in silence.
why wouldnt you go to the woods? good question. A good answer though is that in an auditorium you hear different ambience than in a forest. this tune is usually played alongside others.
@Comatorium69 the whole point of the song is to see what different emotions people have and to see peoples reactions to the piece. It's pretty smart if you ask me.
Self Indulgent? A piece specifically designed so that each individual audience member has a clean emotional slate to create and entirely new set of emotions. Not really self indulgent. stop reaching for words. Its a shame people flame this music. THey really mis out on a whole different level of conciousness.
AARGH, I'm so sad I missed this! I graduated a few years ago, but gladly would have come back to recital hour. You can even hear the carillon in the background! PRICELESS!!!! And it did not surprise me at all that Schuster-Craig would be the one to stand up! AAAAAhahaha
You know, you complain about recital hour when you're there, but I kind of miss it sometimes now that I'm out... *tear*
My dad was asked to perform this on piano. He didn't know whether to be honoured or offended, lol. John Cage was brilliant at innovation and experiments but I don't rate his music at all. The people giving the standing ovation are typical of the pretencious audiences (and composers) that dominant contemporary music. They'd give a standing ovation to an orphanage burning down if it was classed as "contemporary art" just to try and prove that they're intellectually superior to the rest of us.
what u do here is to prove that u are the onw thinks he's intellectually superior, because,i think this piece is extraordinary and brilliant, because music is nothing more than a mixture of sound and silence, and what cage does here is to just "play" the silence....and the effect is that u can hear everything around u, every little noise....incredible
my orchestra teacher says this is the only song he can play on the piano! he said one time when he did it some guy was in the back room playing the trumbone and he was doing a HORIBBLE job! that was funny! brought back lots of good memories
Friend: you could tour around the country playing this
Me: i'm playing it right now
Friend: the goal is to convince people that it is not that there is no music being played, but to expect music to be played at a concert is shows narrow minded heterosexist and racist bias.
Friend: "what is music, what expands the concept of music, is music limited to the musicians, is music more than frequencies, is music silence, is silence music, is doing nothing artistic if you say it is"
Friend: blah blah blah
Me: no '
Me: no it is
Friend: "I'm pretending that doing nothing makes me a deep performer"
I applaud John Cage his work in experimental composition, and think that he's one of the key 20th century composers, at least as far as Avant-Garde goes. I also understand the point of 4'33", but in all honesty, this is completely and ridiculously pretentious.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
They didn't do anything! Why give a standing ovation! I could just gather 20 of the least talented musicians, tell them to hold instruments, and then just look at my watch and tell them to be quiet. I bet John Cage wrote this as a joke to see how many people he could fool.
My music professor played this piece for class the other day, and explained the point of this song was to encourage people to listen to the music that is around them; the sound of an audience member coughing, the sound of a heartbeat, anything. Cage's music is quite inspiring. ty for posting this piece
my goodness, why isnt anyone walking out on this?!?!? instead, they clap for it?! wtf?! i can sit in front of a piano looking at my watch for 4 minutes 33 seconds, and do the same damn thing?! they even get a standing ovation from a white guy and some lady????? what the hell is this crap?!?!?
Where do you stand in the great bullshit debate? What are your views about bullshit? Is it a significant social force? Is it an important element of modern society? Has bullshit developed in recent years? Is the quality of bullshit as high as in the 1990s? Or do you not have views? Do you need advice from a bullshit guidance expert?
Should bullshit become a way of life? Should the future of bullshit be regulated by government legislation, or by qualified independent consultants?
Although this video was posted six months ago there are much fewer comments for this performance than for the ones by the BBC Symphony Orchestra and David Tudor elsewhere on YouTube (there are hundreds of comments for these, varying from abuse to serious appreciation of it) so viewers may be interested to see the arguments elsewhere. But this performance is the one which is the most well-received by the audience.
No, the guitarist who performs 4'33" on the No. 333 bus is getting wildly enthusiastic comments by YouTube viewers. Some of the comments have a +50 rating of more. Search for "cage 333".
I'm hoping this will be on GLEE soon.
1285Escuela 1 month ago
It's full of mistakes.
ledzepfran 5 months ago
That was an amazing violin solo at the end.
PabzGLRP 6 months ago
I'm glad they brought in a guest violinist; most can't handle the subtle nuances of this masterpiece.
MrJohnstonful 7 months ago 2
They're not really playing it, they're just standing there silently.
goldencricket 8 months ago
There are even trolls in the classical music world.
40Ringz 9 months ago 7
find it hilarious that they needed to tune their instruments before "playing" this piece!
RedCl0ud22 9 months ago 2
Comment removed
RedCl0ud22 9 months ago
can't get this tune out of my head, damn it!
shallowphil 1 year ago 6
Too bad this was recorded before the phrase "this is actually happening" got popular.
KFCJones 1 year ago
this is my gcse music sorted:)
mushitsme 1 year ago
Kunst
istnicht37 1 year ago
"No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public." - -- Henry Mencken
Apparently this applies universally, not just to the American public.
metube336 1 year ago 2
"LOOK! The emperor has no clothes!"
metube336 1 year ago
Shouldn't they be turning the pages on their scores? Looks like they play it completely by heart. I want to practice this one would be a good filler after playing the Goldberg Variations. Oh just half way through 3:42, 4:35 - I didn't know before it it actually had 3 movements? I think it might be more interesting to see with an audience that doesn't know the piece as the reaction of the audience is the most important part of the audible aspects of this piece.
realraven2000 1 year ago 2
I can not believe that some one programmed this piece. I understand the concept....but.....really??? Well done I guess haha
Skizzot2005 1 year ago
I did a grindcore remix of that song!
artman40 1 year ago 3
Incredible!!!!, listen to those polyrhythms!!!!
Now here comes the cello arpeggios!!!!
Trumpets playing in triplets and piano in quoter notes!!!!
Kessler has just dropped his flute so we'll have to start over again.
Rajhoul 1 year ago
I'd imagine this piece would be nerve-wracking to play. You have to be sure not to disrupt the silence too much.
metaserve 1 year ago 3
waaaaat
shadow21491 1 year ago
From the way they tuned, I'm glad this was their program.
jeffamarie 1 year ago 2
I wonder if any of them were nervous about their parts...
jeffamarie 1 year ago
Smug, pseudo-intellectual wank for self-congratulating culture snobs.
eleanordee 1 year ago
Can't believe I listened to that the whole way through... fml.
jackalexander102 1 year ago
@jackalexander102 It's much better live, through video you don't really experience the music
lilkrissy123 1 year ago 3
fantastic page turning technique!
MyMurphy2 1 year ago
aff... muito ruim
lilianayres 1 year ago
why did they bother tuning the instruments?
ChaosDynamics 1 year ago
Why did they play the second movement first?
dhaddox 1 year ago 3
My favorite part of this peice is at about 2:10 where the silence really intensifies.
I think John Cage did an incredible job of combinding the quietness of the strings and the muteness of the woodwinds.
I've been working on learning to play this, but I keep bursting into song at about 4:11. Almost there.
EagleOnTheRhine 1 year ago 4
00:47 to 1:00 reminds me of the jingle you hear when you start your ps3
Schaezen 1 year ago 2
I love that there's a "Guest Violinist". Do you think he got paid Musicians' Union scale for the gig? For that matter, does John Cage's estate receive a royalty payment every time 4:33 is "performed"? If somebody else released a silent piece, can Cage's estate sue them? These are the questions I ponder late at night when sleep won't come.
kw21925 1 year ago 2
esta obra tengo que interpretarla x
con mi grupo de música contemporánea¡
lanenanena19 1 year ago
Why are they clapping at the end? Is this serious? For all we know, those musicians could have been the first dozen people pulled off the street.
RidleySS18 1 year ago
@RidleySS18
thats the beauty in fluxus
they very well could have
Lievcocijo 1 year ago
Haha, they tuned at the beginning.
FrontalTraction 1 year ago 2
I wrote something similar but mine is nearly twice as long.
billheartyface 1 year ago
Humourously pretentious.
amlawrance 2 years ago
John Cage was a student of Schoenberg, but will never have the same musical talent as him. 4"33 is simply a joke, Cage said there will always be sounds, there is never perfect silence, so why make a piece that tries so hard to be silent?
and wtf is with 'guest violinist' in this example? they still do NOTHING, it doesn't take talent to replicate this piece.
Rhys666Metaller 2 years ago
Maybe we should be happy they don't have to play a note. Perhaps the violinist really sucks.
Extenuation 2 years ago
beautiful!!! amazing!! genius!!!
seriously!
aviahadhad 2 years ago
haha nice they're even turning the pages as they play
hearmepeeps 2 years ago 3
as they "play"
istickyricei 2 years ago
Well, some songs are just one big waterfall that keep comming. Some songs use the silence between the notes. Now someone made a piece with complete silence, and a lot of (narrow minded, i think) people start complaining. But when a piece of music is one big waterfall of sound, you hear them praise the composer. Perhaps the just don't understand the sound of silence.
Extenuation 2 years ago
I know, I've been trying to get my book published, but no one has the balls to publish it because it has no "words", "pages" or "cover". They just don't get it.
I never watch TV.
benitokicksass 2 years ago
You don't read much, do you? There actually is a book without words, only blanc pages. Unfortunately, I can't remember the title of the book (yes, it has one). What I can remember, is a book by W.F. Hermans that just stops in the middle of the story, in the middle of the sentence, followed by a few blanc pages. Quite interesting if you understand the philosophy behind it.
Btw, why do they tune up for a silent piece?
Extenuation 2 years ago
Kanye West wrote a book with blank (or "blanc", looks like you don't read much, huh?) pages in it. Any talentless hack can bullshit their way to success so long as there are pretentious idiots who want to tell other people "oh, you just don't get it."
benitokicksass 2 years ago
Sorry about the misspelling, I read in French, English, Dutch and German, so sometimes an err sneaks in, especially with those annoying capitals...
Anyway, John Cage is not a random "talentless hack". He does have quite a reputation, especially in the aleatoric music. I can't say I can appreciate his works, but to let the audience be the music in the piece... Let's say I like the idea. After all, he is the famous and influential pioneer in the avant-garde.
Extenuation 2 years ago
That's still not music. Music by definition must contain rhythm and/or melody.
Art, maybe. Music, no. Bullshit, definitely.
benitokicksass 2 years ago
John Cage is not avant-garde. He is main stream establishment. Avant-garde would be something that is going AGAINST the trend, something experimental/innovative, not something the establishment embraces. Now if Cage were to suddenly write something that instantly captivated the public, the way say Mozart or Beethoven did over 200 years ago, that really WOULD be avant-garde today, but 4'33" is firmly establishment stuff, as promoted every day by the BBC and other main stream organisations.
josepharimathea 2 years ago
dont know if he is an avant-garde but clearly he is a mix between aleatory and integral serialism... and that mix gives him kinda the stamp `Post Modern´ right? and post modernists embraces technology and mainstream no?
And at the time this was performed, his intention was to experiment with both Zen enlightment and creating a notion on the ambient sound around us..
Magnickey 2 years ago
Exactly what wikipedia said. Well read;)
No really: "creating a notion on the ambient sound around us" Couldn't have said it better. If this "song" included any Zen enlightment, I don't know. Sounds pretty accepteble though.
Extenuation 2 years ago 3
really funny, I am writing an essay about post modernism :P but didnt use wikipedia though, not reliable according to good old Harvard Refrencing *geek*
Magnickey 2 years ago 2
Of course there are parts of various pieces of music that have silence, but just because silence can be in a piece of music, it doesn't make it music. It's like- you can have a peanut in a candy bar, but having a peanut isn't the same as having a candy bar.
wannabewinchester 2 years ago
I hate to admit but you seem to have a point.
Still, what is art? Are Pollocks drippings art? Is Le sacre du printemps art? Is Britney Spears art? Could these comments be considered as art?
If these could be art, why isn't this?
But let's not be a hypocrite, it's the easiest piece I've ever heard!
Extenuation 2 years ago
I think I'd be willing to agree this is art; however, I don't know about calling this 'music'.
Haha. It certainly is the easiest piece I've ever heard!
wannabewinchester 2 years ago
This made me lol XD
stupidfuckingidiot 2 years ago
if the silence is music, so the cemitery is woodstock.
goodbyelennon 2 years ago
this must be the fastest song ive ever learned
reksub10 2 years ago 3
I've been trying to memorize this piece for weeks.
dmnhntr86 2 years ago 46
For those who do not understand why this is music, the music isnt performed by the musicians, it is performed by the crowd who makes noise.
Ghi102 2 years ago
you are so wrong
reksub10 2 years ago
This is not music. You cannot take credit for sounds that you did not create. The chirping of crickets or the hum of an air conditioner is not your invention, therefore, calling the sounds surrounding your piece "yours" is fucking selfish, not to mention idiotic.
Cobrevolution 2 years ago
without silence how can you have music?
tazman1066 2 years ago
You missed my point. He's claiming the outside world is "his piece". It is not.
Cobrevolution 2 years ago
but the crowd is making no noise...
JamesR55555 2 years ago
Yeah..supposedly this piece is performed by the crowed..but they are too shy..John Cage 4:33 is a form of aleatoric music..
harritullistiwa 2 years ago
You know you fail when your most popular and recognized composition is silence.
soranaru 2 years ago 2
Fail? On what scale? I think it's a pleasant comment on overlooked beauty- calling the hacking and stifled sniffling of an audience member music, music being one of the pinnacles of beauty.
schmonday 2 years ago
To each his own. But I personally find it to be quite...asinine.
soranaru 2 years ago
Why?
schmonday 2 years ago
Google Fluxus
enarow 2 years ago
Doesn't get much more pretentious than this.
soranaru 2 years ago
If I remember correctly, Todd Reynolds was at Eastman when I was. This is certainly a virtuoso performance and I commend Todd and the gang!
BachScholar 2 years ago 2
too bad audio quality:(
taran801 2 years ago
шо за даунізм???
nuclearmetal2008 2 years ago
finally someone with some taste! lol too many people think about this music too much.
Sojio 2 years ago
truly beautiful
NIKHILSTUDIO 2 years ago
what the hell????? i dont get it :S...they didnt even play an instrument...on one of the comments down there it says " guitar needed to play louder" there was no guitar ffs!!!!
can anyone explain the point to this????
stickyxbutxsweet 2 years ago
@stickyxbutxsweet ... Look up john cage, then you will get it.
xxXDamnationXxx 2 years ago
Music is a combination of sound and silence at different proportions. This is the height of emotional music. If you sat there wandering what was happening you need to learn how to listen to music.
Sojio 2 years ago
Music is an art form whose medium is sound organized in time. Common elements of music are pitch (which governs melody and harmony), rhythm (and its associated concepts tempo, meter, and articulation), dynamics, and the sonic qualities of timbre and texture.
taken from wiki......music is not silence!!!
stickyxbutxsweet 2 years ago
good example of how wikipedia is not a reliable source and can be edited by anyone
Sojio 2 years ago
i think that we should just agree that everyone has their own mind and thier own opinion on this, in my opinion this is not music and infact if i was sat there in the audience i would laugh my ars off , i mean would you realy pay to go and sit there while someone was just standing there haha, anyway sojio i respect your opinon even though it is far different from mine :)
stickyxbutxsweet 2 years ago
another part of the piece is how the audience reacts to sitting in silence for four and a half minutes. it's called experimental music because you don't know exactly how it will turn out.
jazzupright 2 years ago
You believe everything you read on Wikipedia?
WraithCrestfallen 2 years ago
wiki is not a very consice dictionary :P what it describes there is what music was since 18Century, but things change and that definition does too...
Magnickey 2 years ago
does anyone know where i can find sheet music for this?
dzl92 3 years ago 8
I never had the chance to hear this classic live... It must be amazing!
r3z3nd3 3 years ago
OOH!!! I was really, really blown away!
What kind of self indulgent crap is this, You stand is place for 5 minutes and that's art? Gimme a break.
mik9765 3 years ago 3
it's called chance music. Music that could happen. music that is made up from any sound. whether it be the laughter of the audience or the fly on the wall
Cellisima9 3 years ago
So what? Why would you go to a concert to see people perform it when you can sit at home, go to the woods, and sit and listen to "chance" music? I appreciate music that shows a mood - a feeling or emotion. I find it extremely difficult to get any of that from a concert band standing on stage doing nothing. And if there is any type of emotion evoked, its nothing I can't experience on my own in silence.
I dunno, this just doesn't do anything for me
Comatorium69 3 years ago 5
why wouldnt you go to the woods? good question. A good answer though is that in an auditorium you hear different ambience than in a forest. this tune is usually played alongside others.
Sojio 2 years ago
@Comatorium69 the whole point of the song is to see what different emotions people have and to see peoples reactions to the piece. It's pretty smart if you ask me.
beachbrunette11 1 year ago
give you a break? Learn how to appreciate music.
Self Indulgent? A piece specifically designed so that each individual audience member has a clean emotional slate to create and entirely new set of emotions. Not really self indulgent. stop reaching for words. Its a shame people flame this music. THey really mis out on a whole different level of conciousness.
Sojio 2 years ago
Finally, an important piece that even Joe can play.
joethepigg 3 years ago 2
for the audience, this must be tantamount to being rick rolled.
ntino666 3 years ago 6
guitar need to play louder
other than that its good!
Drywalleaters 3 years ago 4
i will play this in the school talent show.
RSydBarrett 3 years ago 28
I don´t like classic-music=)
Bartwuerstchen 3 years ago
I should play this at the schools talent show
Huddiethegreat 3 years ago 7
I'd say that this is a brilliant rendition, but as usual, the oboe is out of tune. Almost perfect performance, though.
;-)
funkifyyourlife 3 years ago 4
Lol the tuning.
YoJolina 3 years ago
Makes you think... or feel... something (probably anger or annoyance)... but that's something... :)
Letranger 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"he "played"?"
pricesly!! What the ****... i just heard the initial cello tuning, the clapping, and the final clapping...
Is this supposed to be 8 minutes o silence?
Geez!!
ertreri 3 years ago
um, this IS the piece, read up on it, search for "4'33" on wikipedia
celach 3 years ago
AARGH, I'm so sad I missed this! I graduated a few years ago, but gladly would have come back to recital hour. You can even hear the carillon in the background! PRICELESS!!!! And it did not surprise me at all that Schuster-Craig would be the one to stand up! AAAAAhahaha
You know, you complain about recital hour when you're there, but I kind of miss it sometimes now that I'm out... *tear*
dabronx8018 3 years ago
gotta love the tuning =P
this piece should be played by many more.
davis1337 3 years ago
My dad was asked to perform this on piano. He didn't know whether to be honoured or offended, lol. John Cage was brilliant at innovation and experiments but I don't rate his music at all. The people giving the standing ovation are typical of the pretencious audiences (and composers) that dominant contemporary music. They'd give a standing ovation to an orphanage burning down if it was classed as "contemporary art" just to try and prove that they're intellectually superior to the rest of us.
SanFranCrisko 3 years ago 5
what u do here is to prove that u are the onw thinks he's intellectually superior, because,i think this piece is extraordinary and brilliant, because music is nothing more than a mixture of sound and silence, and what cage does here is to just "play" the silence....and the effect is that u can hear everything around u, every little noise....incredible
MojoLang999999 3 years ago
my orchestra teacher says this is the only song he can play on the piano! he said one time when he did it some guy was in the back room playing the trumbone and he was doing a HORIBBLE job! that was funny! brought back lots of good memories
WoWawmanlol 3 years ago 2
Friend: or
Friend: how about experimenting with sticking your hand in fire
Friend: with things that may protect you, like gasoline
deegirl222 3 years ago
Me: uh huh
Me: so i shouldn't expect my cereal to tast elike cereal i should always expect a different experience
Me: like perhaps it tasting like dog poo
Friend: consistancy is conformity
Friend: lol
Me: if i touch a hot stove and get burned i shouldn't assume that would hppen every time... i should experiment
Me: will it still burn me if i don't wear so cks
Me: how about if i do it with my hair wet wearing green socks and a purple tee shirt
Friend: yup
deegirl222 3 years ago
Me: in which case i'm a concert pianist
Me: and an astronuat
Friend: you could be
Me: and the queen of england
Friend: you could tour around the country playing this
Me: i'm playing it right now
Friend: the goal is to convince people that it is not that there is no music being played, but to expect music to be played at a concert is shows narrow minded heterosexist and racist bias.
deegirl222 3 years ago
Me: WHAT?!
Me: i don' tthink i follow
Friend: "what is music, what expands the concept of music, is music limited to the musicians, is music more than frequencies, is music silence, is silence music, is doing nothing artistic if you say it is"
Friend: blah blah blah
Me: no '
Me: no it is
Friend: "I'm pretending that doing nothing makes me a deep performer"
deegirl222 3 years ago
I applaud John Cage his work in experimental composition, and think that he's one of the key 20th century composers, at least as far as Avant-Garde goes. I also understand the point of 4'33", but in all honesty, this is completely and ridiculously pretentious.
Music4Ever 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
They didn't do anything! Why give a standing ovation! I could just gather 20 of the least talented musicians, tell them to hold instruments, and then just look at my watch and tell them to be quiet. I bet John Cage wrote this as a joke to see how many people he could fool.
thedeathmetal666 4 years ago
My music professor played this piece for class the other day, and explained the point of this song was to encourage people to listen to the music that is around them; the sound of an audience member coughing, the sound of a heartbeat, anything. Cage's music is quite inspiring. ty for posting this piece
timeschange279 4 years ago 6
he "played"?
NuLLx42 3 years ago
It's called meditation, and you don't have to pay for it. Go to a Zen monastery.
bariswheel 3 years ago
my goodness, why isnt anyone walking out on this?!?!? instead, they clap for it?! wtf?! i can sit in front of a piano looking at my watch for 4 minutes 33 seconds, and do the same damn thing?! they even get a standing ovation from a white guy and some lady????? what the hell is this crap?!?!?
5845147 4 years ago
Well without silence how can you have music, thats what John Cage is trying to show here.
tazman1066 2 years ago 2
Of course you can't have music without silence, but that doesn't make silence music, and I think that's why many people don't like this "piece".
wannabewinchester 2 years ago
okay, my music teacher told me about this song, but isnt 4′33″ suppose to be
4mins 33secs?
chris4312 4 years ago
xDDDD
dandelium 4 years ago
I just wasted 8 minutes of my life. ty john cage
700Ezalb 4 years ago
yeah.. (john cage was a true genie..)
acidiviola 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Where do you stand in the great bullshit debate? What are your views about bullshit? Is it a significant social force? Is it an important element of modern society? Has bullshit developed in recent years? Is the quality of bullshit as high as in the 1990s? Or do you not have views? Do you need advice from a bullshit guidance expert?
Should bullshit become a way of life? Should the future of bullshit be regulated by government legislation, or by qualified independent consultants?
TheBigBullshitDebate 4 years ago
Now I can honestly say I haven't heard it all!!
notetojan 4 years ago
Although this video was posted six months ago there are much fewer comments for this performance than for the ones by the BBC Symphony Orchestra and David Tudor elsewhere on YouTube (there are hundreds of comments for these, varying from abuse to serious appreciation of it) so viewers may be interested to see the arguments elsewhere. But this performance is the one which is the most well-received by the audience.
BrucknerEnthusiast 4 years ago
No, the guitarist who performs 4'33" on the No. 333 bus is getting wildly enthusiastic comments by YouTube viewers. Some of the comments have a +50 rating of more. Search for "cage 333".
GeorgeBushMustGo 4 years ago
with guest violinist, LOL
willzyx23 4 years ago 2
Marvelous
Cervezaalucinogena 4 years ago
LOL!!!!! They actually bothered to tune beforehand!
bistro39 4 years ago 2