No just a reality check, simple observation as to exaclty what has happend backed by recorded and archived history and nothing else.
Simply abbreviated in a straight forward and bluntly honest way, just honestly is a alien thing to most these days, brainwashed yuppie degenerates are society is plagued with.
As for what I want? it makes no difference, its not going to happen anyways, our parents and older generations sold us out down the fucking line along with our peoples nations.
What the fuck does his Surename have to do with anything?....
Also Labour is just as bad, all the majority non nationalist partys are fucking corrupt.
Vote in a Liberal Party, get Marxist multiculturalism and become colonised and shat on by fucking immigrants and virtually watch as you nation is raped into the oblivion.
Vote a Conservative Party, Immigrants have taken over its already to fucking late, now they privatise and sell whats left of you nation to the highest bidder.
Then once you have had enough vote Liberal again and get shafted, then once you've had enough vote conservative then liberal then conservative then liberal and then CONSERVATIVE-LIBERAL COALITION.
Keep playing this game untill your people do not exist anymore, your a third world back worlds shit hole erased ethnically and culturaly off the face of the fucking planet forever whilst the elite marry into a Chinese family and go on to take over some other nation and drive it into shit.
OMG a new fact from our smart Prime minister david cameron. What next? 1+1=2
Can I ask one thing?
if you raise taxes will it discourage people to buy things? because... here we go logamacs great political stance. if you raise taxes people will have less money. He has to think to himself if I was not a millionaire would I be able to afford new TVs game consols horses with these taxes rising? Raise taxesand no one will have money so they can't buy. :o
It's amazing Cameron is still so popular, he never answers questions directly and every time I watch PMQs all he does is make personal insults against Miliband.
@creasicle Yeah, but he is popular in the house, not in the polls. I can't see Ed Miliband as PM, but he will become PM. It's very probably a landslide like 1997.
@creasicle Yeah, but he is popular in the house, not in the polls. I can't see Ed Miliband as PM, but he will become PM. It's very probably a landslide like 1997.
There was a good reason for a hung parliament and both Ed and David proved why there was. Whats worse was that Nicky is even worse at keeping promises and he became the difference maker in the elections. Shows you that you have to vote for the lesser of 2 evils or in this case, no one. The independents and the greens are better choice at this rate.
I personally prefer that you upload the PMQ's separated, because I'm not that interested in the random MP's questions as I am in the main confrontation between Cameron and Ed.
@watcher9999999999999 'Frit' = Frightened, (Lincolnshire dialect); Margaret Thatcher used this when accusing Denis Healey of being scared of a general election in '83.
Cameron is a joke, I honestly don't think I can recall a time he has actually answered a question, not only in PMQs but everywhere else, the man is addicted to spin and thank god the public seems to be wising up to this. The tories in government have just proved "change" is not a word in their dictionary, never has been, and never will be. Rich looking after the rich is an agenda nobody but the rich wishes to adhere to. And as for the Dems, well the polls speak for themselves.
His excuse every single time is 'well the last government left us with this and that'. In four and a half years time, at the general election, that will be wearing mighty thin!
@MVF646 Moron, if you think insulting someone instead of addressing a serious current issue is what passes as a good performance in government then your in the wrong place.
Poshboy Cameron says (at 01:45) the UK had "one of the worst records on debt anywhere that you could mention"...what a load of nonsense! He refuses to answer questions at the forum designed precisely for that purpose and when he does speak, he speaks lies - the man is a charlatan.
Cameron tried to blame the labour party for the conservatives failure to follow through on their ‘no bonus over 2k’ policy. To suggest that the conservatives would like to stop the banker’s bonuses but were prevented doing so because the labour party had somehow misworded the bailout agreements really was stretching credibility.
Absolutely dreadful performance from David - constantly reverting to purile insults does not make him look as though he has the upper hand, rather it has the opposite effect.
Although the blame on Labour for the deficit is a perfectly reasonable and substantial case, it is starting to grow weak. It was, after all, a global recession. The constant diversion of the question from Cameron just looks dishonest.
In saying that, Ed's delivery leaves much room for improvement. As said before, 50/50.
why does the labour leader give tributes to the lost soldiers ?
It is Milliband and his dishonest filthy labour mates who refused to fund the army. refused the helicopters they needed. refused the equipment they needed.
labour should not be allowed to pay any such tribute and the fact they do so shows that they have no shame over their failings in the government.
@kbdkbd99 Hmm yes I have wondered that since Camern has got in through the back door.There has not been once instance of troops dying because of the "lack of kit" that the Sun reported everyday.And gone are the disgruntled officers who later became Tory Peers. Paddy Ashdown even said last year on Question Time that for Officers to politcise the army for the benefit of their own polotics was disgusting.When you join the army you keep yer polotics and religion back in civvy street.
@THESTAFFIECHANNEL - it is well known that the filthy socialist labour scum failed to finance our troops properly. But can these marxist-leninists ever admit it - NO. They just try to divert attention on to someone else.
It's a well known FACT that brown and his mates did not finance the equipment that was needed to save lives.
@kbdkbd99 LOL man listen to yerself. Marxist Leninists ha ha you sound like a Glenn beck Tea Bagger. How is it a Well Known Fact? I was in the army for 6 years and the British Army have always been underfunded.And it is a Fact that since May 6 2010 not a single death has been reported by the press as due to lack of kit.It miraculously changed the day after the election. But people like you only here what they want to.
@kbdkbd99 Agreed, they waged two wars and took forever to get enough Helicopters (there still isn't) and they sent our boys out there on Land Rover defenders, which are completely not fit for the task. Hopefully Blair will be called to account for his war crimes this week in the enquiry...ofcourse we know he won't as the whole Iraq enquiry is a farce.
@liarpoliticians Y'know every time Ed gets childishly mocked with Eton playground style name calling, it slowly reflects bad on Cameron.You lot will support Cameron everytime but he actually is starting to come across intellectually unequiped.Which floating voters will pick up. The Bankers being looked after by the Tories, "money looking after money" that's the real message of today.And from this point on the coalition can be blamed for their actions and cant blame the previous lot.
@liarpoliticians Well, one person was discussing a serious issue the other is a moron that doesn't answer questions, because he has no answers and so results to personal insults. Cameron serving the rich just as his "mother" Thatcher did. The sooner Cameron is sliding out of downing street on his suspiciously large forehead, with Clegg stuck tongue first in his anal cavity, the better!
@liarpoliticians I simply hate a government and the opposition pointing fingers at each other, that's why I will admit that I support the Democratic party of the United States of America, but honestly as long as the VAT doesn't bump up the price too much then I'm still willing to pay - perhaps even for ludacris costs when VAT is paid.
Ed' is so very good at this, and its essential to be lead by someone good in PMQ when in opposition. If the new-labour party didn't have such a pathetic record on being in office. Dave's ok ....george is better at this, but no one touches the Iron Lady in PMQ.
@temporaldisplacement Are you joking? Thatcher was so bad at PMQs in opposition against Wilson and Callaghan, the Times began to bash her- and they are a bunch of racist Tories.
Ed started OK, he's got better. These exchanges are about 50/50 at the moment. I missed the days when Blair used to wipe the floor with Cameron- that was hilarious.
@ToaJoe You are joking aren't you. In Thatcher's time she had answers in her folder to topics that MIGHT come up in PMQ's. These days though, thanks to faker Tony Blair, all questions are pre-screened, so they know what could be asked. It is up to the speaker to chose who asks questions, but the PM already knows the question... they may as well just write it down and get a written answer. It's a play for cameras, but does not explain Gordon Brow's weak performances.
@liarpoliticians Yes, same with Mr. Wilson, and as I remember he used to obliterate her during PMQs because he was such a talented orator. In fact, the racist homophobic sexist Tory newspaper the times used to say she was a terrible leader because she couldn't speak well in PMQs. Say what you want about Blair, but he's a trained barrister. That's why he is phenominal at debates. Cameron is just an etonian fool who mocks, as if that makes him a good orator.
my headmaster rides this arsehole's nuts on the DAILY
DroidBeetleBatallion 9 months ago
Britain owes over £900 billion.
xxxSLEMANYxxx 10 months ago
shut up Cameron
MegaSMITH1123 1 year ago
@MissDumyat
No just a reality check, simple observation as to exaclty what has happend backed by recorded and archived history and nothing else.
Simply abbreviated in a straight forward and bluntly honest way, just honestly is a alien thing to most these days, brainwashed yuppie degenerates are society is plagued with.
As for what I want? it makes no difference, its not going to happen anyways, our parents and older generations sold us out down the fucking line along with our peoples nations.
phr34kyy 1 year ago
@MissDumyat
What the fuck does his Surename have to do with anything?....
Also Labour is just as bad, all the majority non nationalist partys are fucking corrupt.
Vote in a Liberal Party, get Marxist multiculturalism and become colonised and shat on by fucking immigrants and virtually watch as you nation is raped into the oblivion.
Vote a Conservative Party, Immigrants have taken over its already to fucking late, now they privatise and sell whats left of you nation to the highest bidder.
phr34kyy 1 year ago 2
@phr34kyy
Then once you have had enough vote Liberal again and get shafted, then once you've had enough vote conservative then liberal then conservative then liberal and then CONSERVATIVE-LIBERAL COALITION.
Keep playing this game untill your people do not exist anymore, your a third world back worlds shit hole erased ethnically and culturaly off the face of the fucking planet forever whilst the elite marry into a Chinese family and go on to take over some other nation and drive it into shit.
phr34kyy 1 year ago 2
6:37 2.5 billion is more than 2.3 billion?
OMG a new fact from our smart Prime minister david cameron. What next? 1+1=2
Can I ask one thing?
if you raise taxes will it discourage people to buy things? because... here we go logamacs great political stance. if you raise taxes people will have less money. He has to think to himself if I was not a millionaire would I be able to afford new TVs game consols horses with these taxes rising? Raise taxesand no one will have money so they can't buy. :o
logamac 1 year ago
It's amazing Cameron is still so popular, he never answers questions directly and every time I watch PMQs all he does is make personal insults against Miliband.
creasicle 1 year ago
@creasicle Yeah, but he is popular in the house, not in the polls. I can't see Ed Miliband as PM, but he will become PM. It's very probably a landslide like 1997.
ivank1993 1 year ago
@creasicle Yeah, but he is popular in the house, not in the polls. I can't see Ed Miliband as PM, but he will become PM. It's very probably a landslide like 1997.
ivank1993 1 year ago
@ivank1993 let's hope so!
creasicle 1 year ago
There was a good reason for a hung parliament and both Ed and David proved why there was. Whats worse was that Nicky is even worse at keeping promises and he became the difference maker in the elections. Shows you that you have to vote for the lesser of 2 evils or in this case, no one. The independents and the greens are better choice at this rate.
sumrandomguy3 1 year ago
Cut bonuses...cut bonuses.....may win votes, but who pays the tax bill when the city relocates elsewhere?
maclachj1 1 year ago
Ed needs more training, he is so out of his depth!
TheAncientMariner66 1 year ago
I personally prefer that you upload the PMQ's separated, because I'm not that interested in the random MP's questions as I am in the main confrontation between Cameron and Ed.
viaductos 1 year ago
WHat does PM say (about 1840) "as a predecessor of mine once said ..." whats his next and last word? I cant make it out
watcher9999999999999 1 year ago
@watcher9999999999999 'Frit' = Frightened, (Lincolnshire dialect); Margaret Thatcher used this when accusing Denis Healey of being scared of a general election in '83.
bibekd 1 year ago
george osborne is such a tool
Meila2SunsetBeach 1 year ago
Cameron is a joke, I honestly don't think I can recall a time he has actually answered a question, not only in PMQs but everywhere else, the man is addicted to spin and thank god the public seems to be wising up to this. The tories in government have just proved "change" is not a word in their dictionary, never has been, and never will be. Rich looking after the rich is an agenda nobody but the rich wishes to adhere to. And as for the Dems, well the polls speak for themselves.
IHeartThisVidxD 1 year ago
@IHeartThisVidxD
His excuse every single time is 'well the last government left us with this and that'. In four and a half years time, at the general election, that will be wearing mighty thin!
ourhandsaretied 1 year ago
This Ed Milliband is completely and utterly useless. What a dreadful performance!
MVF646 1 year ago 2
@MVF646 Moron, if you think insulting someone instead of addressing a serious current issue is what passes as a good performance in government then your in the wrong place.
IHeartThisVidxD 1 year ago
@MVF646 Truly embarrassing for Labour! Why the hell did they pick this Milliband brother?...political suicide!
TheAncientMariner66 1 year ago
Poshboy Cameron says (at 01:45) the UK had "one of the worst records on debt anywhere that you could mention"...what a load of nonsense! He refuses to answer questions at the forum designed precisely for that purpose and when he does speak, he speaks lies - the man is a charlatan.
planetXXX 1 year ago
Cameron tried to blame the labour party for the conservatives failure to follow through on their ‘no bonus over 2k’ policy. To suggest that the conservatives would like to stop the banker’s bonuses but were prevented doing so because the labour party had somehow misworded the bailout agreements really was stretching credibility.
THESTAFFIECHANNEL 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Absolutely dreadful performance from David - constantly reverting to purile insults does not make him look as though he has the upper hand, rather it has the opposite effect.
Although the blame on Labour for the deficit is a perfectly reasonable and substantial case, it is starting to grow weak. It was, after all, a global recession. The constant diversion of the question from Cameron just looks dishonest.
In saying that, Ed's delivery leaves much room for improvement. As said before, 50/50.
SarahYaBamz 1 year ago
Two sides of the same coin.
EnglishG3nt 1 year ago
Comment removed
THESTAFFIECHANNEL 1 year ago
why does the labour leader give tributes to the lost soldiers ?
It is Milliband and his dishonest filthy labour mates who refused to fund the army. refused the helicopters they needed. refused the equipment they needed.
labour should not be allowed to pay any such tribute and the fact they do so shows that they have no shame over their failings in the government.
kbdkbd99 1 year ago
@kbdkbd99 Hmm yes I have wondered that since Camern has got in through the back door.There has not been once instance of troops dying because of the "lack of kit" that the Sun reported everyday.And gone are the disgruntled officers who later became Tory Peers. Paddy Ashdown even said last year on Question Time that for Officers to politcise the army for the benefit of their own polotics was disgusting.When you join the army you keep yer polotics and religion back in civvy street.
THESTAFFIECHANNEL 1 year ago
@THESTAFFIECHANNEL - it is well known that the filthy socialist labour scum failed to finance our troops properly. But can these marxist-leninists ever admit it - NO. They just try to divert attention on to someone else.
It's a well known FACT that brown and his mates did not finance the equipment that was needed to save lives.
kbdkbd99 1 year ago
@kbdkbd99 LOL man listen to yerself. Marxist Leninists ha ha you sound like a Glenn beck Tea Bagger. How is it a Well Known Fact? I was in the army for 6 years and the British Army have always been underfunded.And it is a Fact that since May 6 2010 not a single death has been reported by the press as due to lack of kit.It miraculously changed the day after the election. But people like you only here what they want to.
THESTAFFIECHANNEL 1 year ago
@kbdkbd99 Agreed, they waged two wars and took forever to get enough Helicopters (there still isn't) and they sent our boys out there on Land Rover defenders, which are completely not fit for the task. Hopefully Blair will be called to account for his war crimes this week in the enquiry...ofcourse we know he won't as the whole Iraq enquiry is a farce.
TheAncientMariner66 1 year ago 2
another dreadful performance by ed
daniel3786 1 year ago 8
@daniel3786 There's nothing 'dreadful' about this performance. It's about 50/50.
ToaJoe 1 year ago
@daniel3786 I thought Ed and David performed badly.
liarpoliticians 1 year ago
@liarpoliticians 'performed' being the operative word.
catothethird 1 year ago
@liarpoliticians Y'know every time Ed gets childishly mocked with Eton playground style name calling, it slowly reflects bad on Cameron.You lot will support Cameron everytime but he actually is starting to come across intellectually unequiped.Which floating voters will pick up. The Bankers being looked after by the Tories, "money looking after money" that's the real message of today.And from this point on the coalition can be blamed for their actions and cant blame the previous lot.
THESTAFFIECHANNEL 1 year ago
@liarpoliticians Well, one person was discussing a serious issue the other is a moron that doesn't answer questions, because he has no answers and so results to personal insults. Cameron serving the rich just as his "mother" Thatcher did. The sooner Cameron is sliding out of downing street on his suspiciously large forehead, with Clegg stuck tongue first in his anal cavity, the better!
IHeartThisVidxD 1 year ago
@liarpoliticians I simply hate a government and the opposition pointing fingers at each other, that's why I will admit that I support the Democratic party of the United States of America, but honestly as long as the VAT doesn't bump up the price too much then I'm still willing to pay - perhaps even for ludacris costs when VAT is paid.
Wongie2009 1 year ago
@daniel3786
I dont think so at all; Miliband handed Cameron's backside to him over the banks.
Not that i support either of those two/three (it's hard to tell now) parties, they're all the same!
ourhandsaretied 1 year ago
Ed' is so very good at this, and its essential to be lead by someone good in PMQ when in opposition. If the new-labour party didn't have such a pathetic record on being in office. Dave's ok ....george is better at this, but no one touches the Iron Lady in PMQ.
temporaldisplacement 1 year ago
@temporaldisplacement Are you joking? Thatcher was so bad at PMQs in opposition against Wilson and Callaghan, the Times began to bash her- and they are a bunch of racist Tories.
Ed started OK, he's got better. These exchanges are about 50/50 at the moment. I missed the days when Blair used to wipe the floor with Cameron- that was hilarious.
ToaJoe 1 year ago
@ToaJoe You are joking aren't you. In Thatcher's time she had answers in her folder to topics that MIGHT come up in PMQ's. These days though, thanks to faker Tony Blair, all questions are pre-screened, so they know what could be asked. It is up to the speaker to chose who asks questions, but the PM already knows the question... they may as well just write it down and get a written answer. It's a play for cameras, but does not explain Gordon Brow's weak performances.
liarpoliticians 1 year ago
@liarpoliticians Yes, same with Mr. Wilson, and as I remember he used to obliterate her during PMQs because he was such a talented orator. In fact, the racist homophobic sexist Tory newspaper the times used to say she was a terrible leader because she couldn't speak well in PMQs. Say what you want about Blair, but he's a trained barrister. That's why he is phenominal at debates. Cameron is just an etonian fool who mocks, as if that makes him a good orator.
ToaJoe 1 year ago
@ToaJoe Well .....I'm compairing Ed's PMQ appearances to his brothers debates and interviews.
Anyway .....my oppinion would be scewed as I'd just watched the 'no no no' PMQ session here on YT.
temporaldisplacement 1 year ago