Added: 2 years ago
From: Zogrim
Views: 35,811
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (99)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • sweet music

  • Incredibly original game despite its technical shortcomings (I guess mostly due to a low-budget production). Anyway, it is worth buying; it has the kind of scenarios (WWI, Civil War) you have always wanted to see in a FPS. Honestly, I am sick of modern warfare and now medal of honor pathetically trying to emulate it. When are you major studios going to do something really kick ass with wars before WWII? It will be much appreciated.

  • I was playing through the demo is laggy as hell,I don't want to buy a game that just lags...

  • @MegaGlitchMaster100 wow, what are your specs?

  • Id love to play this game but it crashes adter 5 minutes of playing ARGHHH can anyone help me???

  • Almost a year since first comment on this post. PhysX is still as awesome as it has ever been.

  • All these losers whining/bragging about the graphics for thier computers for a game whose graphics suck no matter how you're playing it!

  • Nice video and pc but mine will crush yours 10 to 1

  • jesus christ, this physx software is so CPU intensive, even the youtube video is lagging 3fps

  • You are good at making video dude !

  • is it just me or do the bloom effects look better with it off?

    

  • @Mrgyn I am not lying. If I had a camera I would make a video, however I don't. Trust me, I don't feel the need to lie about my computer.

  • @Mrgyn 581 to be exact. But I can build one for a bit cheaper. Yes it can run all new games on medium to high settings. 30-60 FPS, depending on how demanding the game. I am not lying. I will never spend more than 700 on a gaming PC. 500 dollars gets you a lot if you build your computer. If you go alienware, or other OEM's ya of course you are gonna spend over 1000 dollars. Little piece of advice, do some research man.

  • @Mrgyn LMAO! 1000 dollars more?! I spent a little over 500 dollars for my PC. a console inferior hardware for the same price. I mean come on. what is a better deal 400 dollars for hardware from 2004-2005, or 500 dollars for brand new hardware. hmm?

  • 0:33 DERP!

  • До чего игра уныло выглядит.

  • As A PS3 Owner, I can Honestly say that the PC is Underrated

  • @UnratedVerzion ....uhh...you clearly don't own a high end PC....lol. My PC rapes ps3 graphics and physics...hard...very hard....gaping butthole hard.

  • @87lancerguy GoodBye Troll, your not worth my time

  • @UnratedVerzion ....Um...how am I a troll? I wasn't being a dick or starting an off topic argument... I'm only stating that a high end PC will have better graphics and physics processing. Saying PC is overrated is just an opinion...and I'm just stating a fact. If you're gonna be a douche about it...I'd just have to say that you can go get shot in the throat and bleed to death slowly. Apparently I am worth your time because you fucking responded.

  • @87lancerguy He wasn't saying the PC is overrated, he said it's underrated. So he's kind of agreeing with you.

  • @Subzero492 yeah...i noticed that too...but the way he said it (AS A PS3 OWNER), and the way he responded to my comment, it would seem that he meant OVERrated. He wants to be a douche nozzle...and apparently his time is TOO GOOD for others...so fuck him...he didn't have anything to say about what I said, so I can only conclude that I am right. =/ I would gladly retract all previous statements if he said something...but he hasn't.

  • Lol!!! PhysX sucks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Without it all games are better, but nvidia continues to pay for it to gamemakers for some dust effects and so on :D LOL!!!! F.e., there shouldn't be any dust in this game LOL LOL !!! And this garbage from the sly :D Lol :D Stpd fans of nvidia - go to the ass, these PhysXx sucks !!!! :DDD

  • @PBnic0 grow up

  • ATI = Loose

  • They should actually fix the fact that the characters feet are sometimes inside the ground while running 1:33

  • PhysX on !

  • This game is a great example of how Nvidia is spoiling the game experience for any one but Nvidia owners. All the physx effect in this game we have seen in other games done very well without Nvidias Physx. When you pay that inflated price for your Nvidia card and see the Nvidia logo on your game now you know. Not to many games makers program for physx why? Because I own a Ati Radeon :P

    To whom it may concern how Nvidias physx software update slowed the frame rate from previous software BS.

  • i love pc gaming!

  • better than crysis

  • @zackhanscom are u out of ur mind? if that is better then crysis im gonna shot myself

  • Thanks for great compare vid

  • this game looks like a crappy copy of Call of Juarez with new feactures like PhsyX... BS.

  • I thought this game was great, maxed out ran smooth and no bugs for me

  • what video card do you have ?

  • gtx 285

  • Heh. Looks like it's easier to play without PhysX. You get a way better vision when the ground smoke is gone.

  • it is!!!!!!!!!!

  • nice comparison

  • OMG this is a horrible game. DOnt waste your time

  • @lukassstyyy too late I already spend 1 week on it

  • The gameplay with PhysX look nice, but it is more easier without it.

  • changing history is fucking awesome

  • Oh, yeah!

  • I wish they would try to fix the lag on the xbox 360. yes i know about the hardware restrictions but its a great game.

  • The game is already out for the 360. Awful game though.

  • when does this come out to Xbox 360?

  • never

  • Is this game good? it looks good

  • Very cool game !

  • It looks great but if it was multiplayer i would turn this shit off its fucking immposible to see anything with this whole shit flying arround especialy 2:20 ...  Bamm your dead. Fucking fog sniper.

  • worst graphic in a game since 2007

  • The PhysX really made this game much more intense. I also have the 360 version and it sucks balls (laggy in some parts).

    My only graphical gripe in this game is that the lighting sucks sometimes and it doesnt look as good as other games that implement HDR/bloom.

  • @dropcitizen the 360 does not support physx thats why, but all the consoles are limited, so they are bound to lag because of hardware restrictions, oh well, u never reli notice physx much anyway when playing a game, go with ATI more power and faster, physx is just worthless tbh, physx can be software powered aswell as hardware. all depends on the game. any game can have leaves flying close by to the camera view of the screen, dont take physx to do that.

  • @dropcitizen xbox360 = fails

  • Looks more realistic for sure. Also "More better" ahhaahha I remember being taught in 3rd grade English never to use that phrase as its total Fob.

  • look waay better with them off

  • physx made this game look worse tbh

  • Physx on sucks its far more better when its on low!

  • Wow, there must be a prettty bad storm going on since the leafs are really lifting off the ground, going to the right, then going to the left, then going to the right. Its like the wind is constantly switching directions and its always fall, what with all the leaves falling off the free at all times.

    Oddly, that wind doesn't effect tree branches or grass. Hmm...Physx can't handle trees, grass and leaves all at once or something? Not enough memory/processing power...yet?

  • @WBurchnall the leaves are only moving because the soldiers storm past if you look at the soldiers the leaves come from under there feet

  • Really? @1:30 - 1:40ish I do see some leaves that look like they might be from the soliders but that doesn't really explain the leaves coming from left/right off the screen where they are not soliders? and doesn't really explain the changing of direction of the leaves during some parts of the video. Granted, its an ok effect. Its a bit superficious I think compared to say what tessolation could have brought to make environments or characters seem more realistic with the same GPGPU power.

  • Noob. They might have forgot consider that but don't you think they look cool with PhysX?  I do. It's awesome to look how shit is flying around. :)

  • how do i get it?

  • No, PhysX doesn't control graphics - all that fog and all those leaves are just sprites and particles, but if you haven't noticed the PhysX engine is handling how they move (note the fog spreading when cavalry charge through, the movement of the leaves is being taken care of by the card's processor, etc.)

  • HA HA leaves blowing but grass is still....

  • physx really can do that?mmm i dont think so

    srry for my english :)

  • wtf? physx dont affect graphics... they affect how objects move. Looks like they dimmed down the graphics a bit. Falling debris (not from cannon fire debris...) is not physx-based. Thats eye-candy enabled/disabled in graphics.

  • pc = win

  • is there someway to change the phyx/graphics on the 360? because right now the PC graphics are better than 360 graphics... which is sad...

  • get a PC, anything your tiny baby console can do, a computer can do better :p

  • who hasnt got a PC??

  • pc grapichs is always better than console *sigh*

  • @UseHACK but console is cheaper and the new xbox 720 will support direct x 11,too

  • @Icenstoiler: nvidia 480 costs the same as 6 year old console and pc games are all free. piracy ftw

  • @Paperclown 480? I thought the higher you go the better, such as an NVIDIA 9800?

  • not rlly, PC owns.

  • jus look at crysis you dont even need a physics gpu for that and the physics are 1000 times beter then this.

  • i dont understand why they dont jus put this stuff in the games without needing gpu physics most new systems can handle the physics just fine without a gpu

  • GJ123

  • today when I look physx comparision video, I said myself, I have done the right choice to go with ATI. Because the physx of nvidia look too unrealistic at my eyes and ugly(I only like the flag effect of the physx thats it). I will understand if in this game there was always a tornado somewhere but it dont look like. I prefer games that dont use the physx engine and if yes will probly never put it on with a nvidia card >_>

  • true, and if i would have a PhysX support in my card i would never use it...

  • Btw, you're both jealous because you don't have PhysX on your shiity ATI cards hehe

  • lol, i think that u are just jealous for my ati :P

  • Ha!ha!ha!Ha!

  • ATI sucks lol

  • you jsut psot a comment not a fact :D today nvidia and ati is equal to the same level noob

  • You're funny...hehe

  • How so?

  • runs great on both of my computers. My desktop with 2 GTX280's and my laptop Alienware M17x with 2 GTX280's.

  • Is this dedicated? It stutters a lot if so. It still looks pretty good though.

  • It must be, physx can't be put to medium or high without nvidia or physx card.

    Tested it today with HD4870 high graphics medium physx = stutter.

    With 8600GT physx medium graphics high no stutter. But you're right, those animations are "laggy" and stuttery.

  • whats a physX?

  • Good job, Zogrim

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more