Added: 1 year ago
From: TheUSGA
Views: 283,160
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (90)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Obviously fake just like the other. 

  • @iJohnnyish you are a twit mate :-)

  • a little unfocused, but the vid is still awesome. I never thought something that hard could posibly wable so much!

  • How does it do that without cracking??

  • this ball simply hits the steel at a much lower speed than the one in the other video where it just splashes like mushmellow

  • 0.000375 seconds

  • lol fake how can we see the logo in the right place of the camera ? the ball dont turn ??

  • What if this hit you in the fucking HEAD?!? :-D

  • the ball looks like a marchmallow

  • @SMB3Fan123 I meant to say soft rubber.

  • the other golf bal must have been all rubber.

  • @wiithepeople2 Actually, all golf balls are made of rubber.

  • Sweet.

  • yay jello golfballs for dessert!!

  • I like the part when the ball hit the wall

  • Yeah fuck you science.

  • IT JIGGLED :D

  • hold space and its more slower

  • slowlotion makes everything looks like rubber! XD

  • That's exactly what I said..."that's more like it"!

  • Comment removed

  • thats more like it

  • I'll stick to watching the Fake and Gay version of this, it's much cooler.

  • dude! thatd be awesome advertisement, like McDonalds written on the side.

  • It's not spinning beacasue it was not hit by a club. it was shot out of an air cannnon. There is no spin unless there is spin imparted on the ball by an outside force and seeing as the aircannons are the almost the same diameater than the ball its going to be launched with very little spin if any at all.

  • why isnt the ball spinning?

  • this is real guys!

  • cimment below me

  • i would like to hit u

  • btw repressed anger nerds, if you see it on the internet, it doesn't make it real... and even if it is real, what difference does it make in your life to watch a golf ball compress at slow rate frames.. shouldn't the guy filming it do something more useful with his time? shouldn't you? this is youtube.. you get rickrolled half the time here, do you really believe everything you see?

    Thanks again, repressed anger nerds.

  • @AsteroidManiac That's three pointless untrue angry dickholish comments in a row. Will you shut the fuck up already?

  • @AsteroidManiac stop whining and get a life

  • @AsteroidManiac Lol we didn't need your life story man

  • like omg, it's real, like omg it's fake, like omg fuck you for not believing it's real or fake, like omg i used to get abused in high school and no one ever took me seriously and people were always laughing at me, so now i go on the interwebs and type angry stuff... yeah... that will show those bullies i'm tough and strong.. yeah!

    fucking morons.

  • Wow, so many angry nerds on the interwebs. IRL you take punishing blows from losers, so you take your anger out on your keyboard and mash some angry words? are you serious? who cares if it's real or not? who cares if your parents never helped you while bullies were beating you down? who cares if you even exist...? just do the world a favor you repressed anger nerds and stop keyboard mashing on the interwebs.

    Thank you losers.

  • WTF......

  • Its real

  • real and straight

  • what a coincidence..... uuuhhhh...

  • Much more believable than the faked version. You can see that the deformation works as a spring. That's the equal and opposite reaction that Newton kept blabbing on about.

  • did anybody see the perfect product placement?

  • okay, now see, that was a bit more realistic than the water baloon golf ball or whatever fake bullshit i saw before.

  • If you want to be trolls do it in real life pussies and nice job more believable than the other one

  • how much jello did u put in tht golf ball

  • @ggoldheim

    How much jello did "u" put in your mom's tits? Too much.

  • wonder how many times it took for them to shoot the ball so the face would show the USGA on it

  • @GregNavster

    I think all the need to do is drop the ball to the ground with the camera position in a horizontal position.

  • @altec122 wtf no, youd have to drop it from the empire state building to reach the speed its going, and by then it would have turned away from the camera

  • @GregNavster

    still we dont know what speed the ball was going when the ball hit the plate

  • Comment removed

  • @GregNavster

    haha lol I though so was so lazy clicking the video link again to see the description, thanks though :D

  • @altec122 Read the description, it's 150mph.

  • @OniLinkPlus

    already did GregNavster told me so :D, thanks for the info though :)

  • @GregNavster Once if you're Chuck Norris.

  • @GregNavster Good observation sir.

  • @GregNavster I beleive for these kind of shots, the ball isn't hit with a club, but with an air cannon or some sort of device for accuracy and/or timing.

  • @OscarPuertas the R&A use a compressed gas cannon, the testing was used against steel plates with various groove patterns to produce new rules on groove patterns for manufacturers.

  • @GregNavster lol Not many, it wont have been it with a club, it would be automatic by machine so it would face the same way.

  • @GregNavster

    One time. It's not as hard as you would think.

  • @GregNavster the probably didnt actuslly hit the ball to get that effect they must have shot it out of something

  • @GregNavster lol attention to details

  • Maybe once because it didnt rotate

  • There are a lot of similarities with both videos though. The shape change is almost identical, just not as pronounced in this video.

  • @medstudentish

    I would expect it to be similar as that is a property of most elastic materials.....but as you rightly say this one reacts differently....and as I would expect a golf ball to act. They put this video up to disprove the 'other' one on youtube

  • Thank you!

  • solid?

    

  • that other video at 150 mph was def a fake good to see the real one.

  • @mvpjesuslovesu the video at 50 mph is not fake.This one is just a slower hit, probably not even 70 mph.

  • @mvpjesuslovesu The golf ball in the other video you mention (from BBC) obviously has a much lower viscosity than the one in this video, but the wave pattern on the surface from the impact is actually the same in both videos. I am therefore really curious to know exactly what evidence you have to prove the one from BBC is fake?

  • @Dragonion2010 I have a PHD in golf ball viscosity, firing them at a steel plate and then filming it in slow mo and judging it on youtube. It's the only thing i have been doing for ten years of my life.

    Btw i'm being sarcastic.

    I am just making a judgement so stop being a provocative twat and wanting an argument.

  • @mvpjesuslovesu Fair enough :) In that case I am sure you have sufficient reference material to support your statement. Also, I wasn't looking for an argument; I just wanted to know how you could be sure. Because, you know, some people -unlike yourself- actually don't have any problems posting false accusations solely based on their own judgement/intuition without a shred of concrete evidence. Thank you for convincing me you are not one of these (semi-retarded) individuals!

  • @Dragonion2010 No evidence it just looks like it! and no dw i just get fed up of looking at comments on many a video on youtube and seeing 2/3rds of them are just from people wanting pointless arguments! youtube makes me question the human race sometimes... i'm sure you'll agree!

  • @mvpjesuslovesu I agree, though I would personally say it's more like 9/10th :P

  • @mvpjesuslovesu i disagree

    joke

  • @mvpjesuslovesu I fail to see how you can think @Dragonion2010's comment is provocative enough to consider him one of the "people wanting pointless arguments."

    (Side note: I'm one of the people wanting pointless arguments, so come at me bro.)

  • @tomthecat94 Wow. That is truly a great story. Thank you for taking time out in your clearly very busy life to send me that comment. Seriously thanks.

  • @mvpjesuslovesu No, thank _you_ for having spent a slice of your precious time replying to my comment. Hey, this could be the start of something new. *wink nudge*

  • @mvpjesuslovesu the other one is real, this is at a lower velocity and frame rate.

  • @mvpjesuslovesu I think that other one was real, just a very low quality golfball.

  • @jaffey2006 The top layer of it would have to be very soft to not break and if it was it wouldn't hold trajectory and shit that well.

  • @ZeroIsMany Well that's where polymer chemistry comes into play, however cheaper balls are going to have corners cut on them and yeah you're absolutely right that other ball would be phenomenally inaccurate due to resonation.

  • It's cool to see how the ball's shape continues to change after it leaves the plate. I wouldn't have expected that.

  • this to be bitchin

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more