Added: 1 year ago
From: f39eagle2
Views: 4,694
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (51)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • They should show us the REAL MOST ADVANCED military planes. You know... people call them LIGHTS IN THE SKY or UFO...;)

  • @aarrmmeenndd100 The F-35 top speed is actually Mach 1.67 with afterburner but it is still not all that impressive

  • @aarrmmeenndd100 the F-35 is more technologically advanced than the F-22 not more manueverable or stealthier than the Raptor though

  • Ftw

  • the better aircraft today is Su-35, but i love Eurofighter. The F-35 i think is the new Harrier... but very expensive and american wich is a trouble

  • @iSPaLiTo In a simulation done, the Su-35 killed the F-35, (read wiki)

    The Su-35 is a 4.5 gen plane and only costs 50mil,

    The F-35 is a "5th" gen plan and costs 150-400mil.

    Which one would you choose?

  • @abcabcabdfg F-35 is a STOV/L aircraft, its mission is to replace the Harrier, It is by no means a fighter designed to gain air superiority but can be shipped in light carriers without use a nuclear reactor like heavy carrier with CATOBAR system allowing you to transport a large number of aircraft to a remote destination "hemispheric projection"

    Sorry by my bad english

  • @iSPaLiTo 5th gen planes are meant to have super cruise speed...The only reason why USA didn't include supercruise in a 5th gen plane was because the F-35 didn't have super cruise...read wiki

  • @abcabcabdfg see wikipedia: "Thrust_vectoring" you must choose VTOL/STOL or higher maneuverability. You must compare Su-35 with F-22. Typhoon instead is awesome because hasn't got Thrust vectoring. You must read this article too wikipedia: "Air_superiority_fighter" and wikipedia: "Multirole_fighter"

  • @iSPaLiTo you cannot say that because the f-35 really is shit. It's max speed is 1.6, it doesnt even have high maneuverability it's a over due, over prices jet. The only reason why UK, Israel, Australia, Italy etc decided to partner the project was because the jet was meant to cost 70-75 million each...Cost have now gone to 156m average..This plane is disgusting and pathetic

  • @abcabcabdfg it is needed a succesor for Harrier II plus

  • @iSPaLiTo "Successor", you cannot simply use those terms for 2 different products...The Nokia C6 is the successor to the Nokia N97...What you are saying is That the Nokia C6 is the successor to the samsung 7611.

    The F-35 is the most expensive military project ever run due to engine failures, avionic failures etc. The jet costs double it's quoted price...

    What would you do if u bought a car from ebay for 7k and you gave them your credit card details and they charged you 14k?

  • @abcabcabdfg not, the most expensive was Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit by far

  • @iSPaLiTo Yeh bro B-2 costs like 2bil 2011 money which is practically half the size of one of the african nations but the F-35 is now one hell of a useless plane considering the performance and the costs...

    It's max speed is Mach 1.6 and it only has 1 engine.

  • @abcabcabdfg Speed is not a cruicial afctor in aircraft engineering anymore, a single engine gives alot of extra benefits, better fuel efficiency = longer range, and less maintenance.

    F-35 got its sting in stealth and the B-version in ability to take-off without runway.

  • @abcabcabdfg These were simulations, not actual combat. the Su-35 is an air superiority plane, and the F-35 an attacker/figther. you chould compare the F-22.

    In red flag 2008 with IAF Su-30 MKI (same system as Su-35) The F-22's were well above the MKI's. they said that the MKI was a tad better than the F-15 and F-16, but the Raptor was much btter than the MKI.

  • @JVC7400 good point...Those were simulations and every single thing about the F-22s performance has also been a simulation done by RAND and other companys...So the F-22s performance is pure simulation and not actual combat....Also the Su-30 is actually a lower version of the Su-35 (lol at you thinking they the same) so are you saying the F-18 is using the same system as the CF-18 and works the same? bro you on crack....Good Day too you Sir.

  • @abcabcabdfg Red flag are in the air, how would you fly 100 F-35's at one time when there is not produced this many?

  • @abcabcabdfg BTW, you said the F-35 costed up 400 mill, so lol at you thinking that. (just trying to look like an ass like you did by saying lol, lol?)

  • @JVC7400 oh BTW you said it doesn't...Read wikipedias sources that were published by the PENTAGON and THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE which costs have been extimated at 150-400 so yeah LOL at you replying that it doesn't...

  • @abcabcabdfg That is the estimated price, there is a long way between 122 and 400 million dollars.

    The russians have also had problems with the PAK-FA, and it was made a decade behind the F-22.

    5th gen was in America 10 years before russia. heck they could probably even have stolen files about the F-22. they are known for copying the Allies. (Tu-4, T-4, Su-24, Tu-160, AA-2 atoll, Tu-204/214, YAK-38 and the Tu-144, which was a fail because of the fake papers planted by french counter-spies.)

  • @JVC7400 What??? The T-50 looks nothing like the F-22 and didn't America copy the Russian Yak-141 design to make the F-35?? Hmm...Lol..

    Your statement is a good example of what i am trying to say...Russia/China was long way behind USA back then and now it seems like they catching up VERY fast...While Americas economy and status is falling, Russia/Chinas economy and status is increasing alot...Heck even America experts say China is the next superpower.. LMAO USA COPY RUSSIAS Yak-141 to make f35

  • The Russian S-400 air defence system can shoot down the F-35 Lighting II

  • @Niksa123456789 OMG! we need a better aircraft!

  • Isn't that the one they designed on that show?

  • This aircraft is really ment to replace the F-117. This isn't a fighter in a true sense, since it's main goal is to fly into enemy territory and drop two 500 lbs bombs and fly out. This aircraft would be nearly worthless against the Taliban since even Brazil's Super Tucano could deliver the same payload and do it just as effective, but cheper.

  • @orlock20 actually the F-35 is a true fighter with advanced air to air capability.people make the mistake and over look its air to air capability.its just as capable in the air to air role as any fighter out there with the exception of the F-22 and perhaps the Su-35,Eurofighter and maybe the Rafale.but make no mistake,the F-35 is very capable of going up against all those fighters i just mentioned and wining.

  • australia has brought some of these to replaces its F-18s

  • australia hasbrought some of these to replaces its F-18s

  • 3:00 : keep dreaming

  • @Zed8690 What, because in the simulation the F-35 shot down a MIG-29?

  • @nbenicewicz right

  • @Zed8690 Correct Me if I'm wrong but hasn't the MIG-29 been shot down on multiple occasions in Iraq and Yugoslavia by F-15s? The F-35 is a more advanced aircraft than the F-15 on top of that the F-35 is a stealth aircraft.

  • @nbenicewicz one F15 + awacs against an old mig ? easy for the usaf...

  • @nbenicewicz possible, but not with a Russian pilot in the cockpit. If they put me in the cockpit of MiG-29, I would be shot down too

  • @Zed8690 Russian pilot, how? The Russians have no veteran experience to counter anything that the US has come out with. The Iraqis during desert storm were combat hardened veterans from a nearly decade long war with Iran and they couldn't shoot down any US or coalition fighters.

    When a Russian MIG or Sukhoi pilot shoots down an F-15, F-22 or F-35 then you can say I told you so.

  • @nbenicewicz Agreed.in modern air combat U.S. aircraft have had an advantage against Russian aircraft especially the F-15.no F-15 has ever been lost in air to air combat.you could say the F-15 is the best fighter ever made.many say that honor belongs to the F22.but until the F-22 beats the F-15's perfect combat record then in my view the F-15 is still the best.

  • @SilverTaurus22 can you tell me when an f15 had to fight against a modern aircraft ?

  • @bingofioul F-15's defeated Mig-29's during the Iraq war and also in Yugoslavia in the 1999 war.also a number of Mig-25's were shot down in the Iraq war.i would say that the Mig-29 is slightly more modern than the F-15 but the F-15 has proved to be a much better fighter.

  • @SilverTaurus22 in irak there was almost 100 times more coalition fighters than iraki fighters in the sky with f111 forelectronic war and awacs, irak fighters were underequiped with old missile... that's the same for yougoslavia. the f15 is a good fighter but have never fought against an equivalent force...

  • @bingofioul The Mig-29 is a good fighter but it wasnt design to be a direct competitor to the F-15. The Mig-29 is smaller and more maneuverable but it carries a smaller radar and would lose to an F-15 at long range. If you want to compare close range performance then of course the Mig is better but really it was designed to compete with F-16's and F-18's which both outmaneuver the F-15. The F-15 and Su-27 are closer together in a comparison.

  • @bingofioul the F-15 is not just a good fighter it has the best combat record of any fighter in history of aviation.it has everything needed to be the best balanced fighter...SPEED..MANEUVERABILI­TY ... ADVANCED LONG RANGE RADAR ... FIREPOWER ...RANGE ..SERVICE CEILING...SITUATIONAL AWARENESS and it can land with only one wing..now lets see any other aircraft do that??

  • @nbenicewicz a 3 year old in an retired F14 could bring down a MIG xD

  • marvelous! 

  • This is supposed to replace the Harrier,Hornet,F-16 & A-10 but honestly I think it can only replace the Harrier and maybe(that's a big maybe) the F-16. The Hornet probably not cuz nothing can beat it's versatility and the A-10 forget about it. the reason it can't...2 words GAU-8 Avenger

  • Thanks B for this vidéo

    One plane but 3 versions.

  • love the video keep it up

  • great video. keep em coming!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more