now this is odd. ive seen so many videos in which the eyeball has crystal-clear, and so was the video, under proper lighting. if i read correctly, there have been many defective eyeball units, so maybe im wrong, but you could have gotten a bad one
it is so obvious that the eyeball sounds wayyy better, the background noise is reduced so much and i can hear your voice more clearly, the logitech looks wayy better than the eyeball, hmm if only there was a webcam with the vid quality of the logitech and mic quality of Blue
the logitech definately looks better but the eyeball definately sounds better. I dont think you had the volume up on your eyeball because i can whisper and easily be heard, whereas i couldnt even understand what you were saying
themafia69, the Blue Eyeball is a condenser microphone (+webcam which really did kinda sucked); that is why the volume is so low. A condenser microphone is suppose to act this way and exclude all of the surrounding sound and environment to record deeper, more fuller vocals and instruments. If you really wanna show us what the Eyeball really sounds like, talk upclose to the microphone and I am SURE it will blow the QuickCam away. Although the video comparison on the two is out of the question.
if i had to choose one of those, i'd take the logitech. the only problem there is, that i'm using snow leopard and the logitech is not compatible with it. at least that is what i have heard. can anybody acknowledge that?
thanks for the video. you can really see the difference
For general everyday purpose I use the Logitech pro 9000 for good video. For recording purpose I use the Blue Eyeball for good instrumental recording.
to mee the blue sounds softer on the ears. but that could be because it's lower. I have a logitech ORBIT pretty nice picture, but it's sound is harsh. But the picture is WAY better than the Blue! Thanks for the Review!
now this is odd. ive seen so many videos in which the eyeball has crystal-clear, and so was the video, under proper lighting. if i read correctly, there have been many defective eyeball units, so maybe im wrong, but you could have gotten a bad one
ninjaboy552 1 year ago
it is so obvious that the eyeball sounds wayyy better, the background noise is reduced so much and i can hear your voice more clearly, the logitech looks wayy better than the eyeball, hmm if only there was a webcam with the vid quality of the logitech and mic quality of Blue
GeoAl09 1 year ago
the logitech definately looks better but the eyeball definately sounds better. I dont think you had the volume up on your eyeball because i can whisper and easily be heard, whereas i couldnt even understand what you were saying
neji021 1 year ago
themafia69, the Blue Eyeball is a condenser microphone (+webcam which really did kinda sucked); that is why the volume is so low. A condenser microphone is suppose to act this way and exclude all of the surrounding sound and environment to record deeper, more fuller vocals and instruments. If you really wanna show us what the Eyeball really sounds like, talk upclose to the microphone and I am SURE it will blow the QuickCam away. Although the video comparison on the two is out of the question.
hocly22 1 year ago
There is a pulse at the top right corner though with the Logitech
MikeGlassVideos 1 year ago
if i had to choose one of those, i'd take the logitech. the only problem there is, that i'm using snow leopard and the logitech is not compatible with it. at least that is what i have heard. can anybody acknowledge that?
thanks for the video. you can really see the difference
VEG4able 1 year ago
@VEG4able I am using snow leopard, there is no compatibility problems with the logitech.
themafia69 1 year ago 2
@themafia69 thanks a lot
VEG4able 1 year ago
For general everyday purpose I use the Logitech pro 9000 for good video. For recording purpose I use the Blue Eyeball for good instrumental recording.
XbandChicago 2 years ago
hey themafia, just wanted to say thanks for the video, you helped me out man.
amj445 2 years ago
The Blue SOUNDS better, But Logitech LOOKS better picture! I"m thinking of just getting the blue for audio, and logitech for vid. what do you think?
microphonejones 2 years ago 3
honestly, the sound on the blue sucks. I returned it and got another Logitech. Everything about the blue eyeball 2.0 was rubbish!
themafia69 2 years ago
to mee the blue sounds softer on the ears. but that could be because it's lower. I have a logitech ORBIT pretty nice picture, but it's sound is harsh. But the picture is WAY better than the Blue! Thanks for the Review!
microphonejones 2 years ago
If you want the Eyeball for audi only, just buy the Blue Snowflake.
amj445 2 years ago
haha, i was about to buy the Eyeball... not anymore... :) Thanks
patrismurcia 2 years ago
Most welcome. This is the reason I made the video!
themafia69 2 years ago
nice hat!
brittanycarraway 2 years ago
hahahaha the eye ball is terrible, the one that you had is wayyy better
samerziadeh 2 years ago
the one that i HAVE.
themafia69 2 years ago
yes please
samerziadeh 2 years ago
Logitech quickcam pro is way better than the blue.
DigiRarefaction 2 years ago
I remembered blue, came up in a conversation we once had so i knew it was good with mics, turns out this product is not good at all!
themafia69 2 years ago
I am surprised the audio is not good because they make amazing mics.
DigiRarefaction 2 years ago