nothing is wrong with Paul. his doctrine is not saved by faith without works, his doctrine is christ was the new covenant to his people and we were no longer justified by the law and sacrifice. his death was a final sacrifice which brought grace(mercy) cus in the world to come(today) the law would be near impossible to keep fully we'd be scattered and sacrifices in tha law would be unattainable, where can u get a ox or lamb everytime u broke tha law today. paul helped introduce the new covanant
it isn't the time of the Ram anymore, it is the time of the fishes moving into the time of aquarius, jesus will deliver his people into the age of aquarius jus as moses(Ram) delivered his people to joshua. Paul teaches no longer is it the time of moses, its all about christ,, which was romans 8:4 to obey gods laws in spirit. gala 5:25 if we live by spirit, walk in the spirit. Gala 5:22 fruit of spirit is love.. what is love? 2 john 1:6 and this is love, that we walk after his commandments
What you don't understand is: works are merely 'evidence' of faith. ... not the faith itself. Just as "sinning" is evidence of fallen nature, but is not the genetic/spiritual flaw itself. Paul was merely saying that what God gave, He gave without a condition attached long before you believed and started doing good. Thus ur 'good works' had nothing to do with *His DECISION* to offer salvation. Works are the *indicators* of your belief. He didn't chose to offer salvation *because* of them.
5:00 He's basically saying "Shaddup Pharisees, any law that is or isn't being followed is about God. Stop judging people and taking it personally, it's not about you."
One very important thing needs to be made about Paul. When Paul spoke out against the law, he was speaking out against the Laws of the Pharisees, and "Traditions of men" NOT the ten commandments. Jesus was killed for speaking out against the EXACT same laws that the Pharisees held so dear. It seems Paul haters are having a hard time transitioning from Law to Grace. Pauls writings are so beautiful! The love he had for his brothers and sisters in Christ was so tender and sweet..made me cry.
6:07 He's saying that the actual removing of the skin is nothing, it becomes somthing only because God was being obeyed in the process. If you take away circumcision, (which in itself had no spiritual signifigance, only what was attributed to it) obeying God still remains. It's all about the spirit in which we obey the commandments, and not the act preformed to obey. Judas ate of Jesus' bread in the wrong spirit, just like there are many people nodays following Christ in the wrong spirit.
I think you are in absolute ignorance and distort Paul's teachings as Peter spoke about in 2Pet 3:16. The other apostles took him in as a brother in Christ and discerned by the spirit that he was speaking the truth. It's apparent that you do not have the spirit of truth because you cannot determine what is truth and what is not truth and create lies and heresies to distort the truth of God.
The "if-then conditional" does not always appear in traditional "if-then" form, but in the case of Matt 19:17 the hypothesis has been specifically identified.
IF thou wilt enter into life (P), (THEN) keep the commandments. (Q)
P -> Q
If Paul is incorrect in Rom 3:28 and Gal 3:11, then LOGICALLY CONCLUDE the truth of the Antecedent (P) without Affirming the Consequent. (Q)
We are saved by the Death of Jesus. One who does not love the death and suffering of Jesus shall not enter Paradise. We are saved by rejoicing in the pain and humiliation of Christ. Apostle loved the torment Jesus went through like no other Apostle. Apostle himself allowed himself to be humiliated by being probed, imprisoned, stripped naked and violated in front of women and children, bathed in feces and urine he wrote the Holy Testament while in chains! Glorious.
We cannot earn salvation by our own works, because no one is good, except God. We simply don't know what is good. Instead of trying to do good, we should rather try to not sin. Circumcision is meaningless, cruel and is a work of the flesh (sin).
Why is it that I who was raised a baptist yet after I had studied the writings of the Apostle Paul came away from it with the understanding that we are saved by grace not by our works yet we are to strive to obey His Holy law not for salvation but rather because we love God/Jesus and His Holy Laws. So we are to keep His Holy Laws not in the hopes of gain, but out of love for Him and His Laws. Now I ask you which of these are greater? Keeping His laws for gain or because of our love for Him?
For example, in Romans 7:7 Paul declares the purpose of God's law "Well then, am I suggesting that the law of God is sinful? Of course not! In fact, it was the law that showed me my sin. I would never have known that coveting is wrong if the law had not said, "You must not covet.". And Paul was very clear that we should not keep on sinning after we receive grace. Also, Paul wrestled with rabbinical teachings which both Jesus and Paul taught we should get rid of.
morningsun29, you bring out very good points in your video, thanks. What I disagree with you is that Paul was teaching that we can break God's law. I don't see that in his writings and I think you are misunderstanding some of the verses you point to. Very understandable since most Christians interpret them that way.
I think Paul was mostly trying to explain to the Jews of his day that it wasn't their works that justified them, just like obeying the law won't make you innocent if you are guilty.
You fail to understand that we are living in the dispensation of Grace, not the dispensation of law where works were required to prove your faith, you have been over taken by seducing spirits.
Paul's writings are misinterpreted. For example, the lord called on him in a dream to rise and eat, but he said that he doesn't eat anything unclean (even though it was talking about men). Also, regarding circumcision, he was trying to express that circumcision doesn't matter, because you have to keep ALL of God's laws (not just a specific few) that's why the verse is read but may seem like a contradiction at the ending.
Take notice that the Apostle Paul was not rebuked by any of the other Apostles of that time, not even the Apostle Peter whom the Apostle Paul corrected. for his actions concerning the gentiles which angered Peter so that he called a meeting of all the Apostles to discuss the problem and he was found to be in the wrong and it was decided that he, Peter would be the Apostle unto the Jews while the Apostle Paul would be the Apostle unto the Gentiles.
@Fitzlight62 Paul said that the gentiles were given salvation to provoke the Israelites to JEALOUSY. The gentiles are ruling all over the earth, this is their salvation. The gentiles in regards to Peter/Paul incident were Israelites from the northern kingdom who were in captivity and started to live just like the gentiles, so they were called gentiles. Gentiles are not saved. Paul was not false, people just don't understand his writings and Peter said that would happen
Circumcision is of a work of the flesh under the old covenant that was broken by but (again) Matthew 5 Christ tells us that it is our hearts that are judged bc we're incapable of keeping the law and Mat19:16no one is good. Gal5:3-4Paul is sayingChrist came and kept the law for us bc we couldnt, but if you are still trying to do something you cant and that Christ already did for you its like having a free pass or gift(Eph2:8) that Christ gave you but you refuse it and try to do it of yourself.
OT Hos6:6 Gods delights in loyalty not sacrifices (sacrifices r part of old covenant) its your heart that God wants not your works. in Jonah, Ninevah is forgiven for repenting which is the same Christ asks of us. Ninevah had no works but were wicked. All God required was belief Jona3:5 and repent 3:10.
Most all of the verses n the video are taken out of their context and not elaborated on which is misleading
Ro14:5 is speaking about judging your brothers. that we should not judge our brothers bc one regards the day and one doesnt but it will be left up to the Holy Spirit which is our conscience. 14:14-15 Paul tells us the reason for this. By our actions if our brother is hurt then we are no longer acting out of love (which is the greatest commandment, greater than keeping the sabbath holy)
Col2:16 Paul uses a yearly, monthly, and weekly expression through the traditions that is used throughout the OT explained in Lev. 23:1-24. and reiterated in1Chr. 23:31, 2Chr2:4, Ez 45:17 & others. But Col2:17 (which is left out, destroying the context) Paul is saying that these traditions are merely a shadow of Christ and you can rest in them but why not rest in the actual Christ? The OT holds many foreshadowings of Christ, the basis of the traditions holding many of them.
This video also implies that James in his letter to the 12tribes he is speaking to Paul instead of to the 12 tribes. if this was so every time James writes the word "You" he would be speaking to Paul thus the letter would be addressed accordingly. Obviously this isn't the case, not only bc it's addressed to the 12 but also Paul in Gal. 5:6 speaks of faith working through love. He recognizes that works are important,but they do not justify.Our works are from our grace-changed hearts after salvatn
Jn14:15"if you love me you will keep my commadments" Love of Christ comes before the works.Our faith does not reflect our works but our works reflect our faith. Our works are just out of our obidience but are not what saves us. We need His grace and salvation to even be capable of loving Him and doing good works. Isaiah 64:6 "our righteous deeds are like filthy rags" 1cor7:18 the very verse you quoted says to follow the commandments. circumcision is nt a commandment bt n the Oldcovenant
I see alot of false interpretations of the God inspired scriptures of Paul. 1st in Gal 2:21 he does not say if you keep the commadments Christ died in vain but if you believe that you are justified by the commandments He died needlessly which is true. Christ told us Himself we cannot keep the commandments. Matthew 5 informs us that it is our hearts that are judged with sin. If we could be saved by the law then why did Christ die?
Also the real church is not a building acts 7:48 our body is. The catholics created the tithing. The roots wasnt true becuz the african kings sold them to the europeans so they wouldnt used their natural resources to sell. Slavery was created by the epgytians n Africans n has always been that way.
When you have finished paying all the tithe of your produce the third year, which is the year of tithing, and have given it to the Levite, the stranger and the sojourner, the fatherless, and to the widow, that they may eat within your towns and be filled,
Deuteronomy 26:11-13 (in Context) Deuteronomy 26 (Whole Chapter) Duties of the Priest to be present at and supervise the tithing. Any money was to go to the above named as well.
Paul is talking about the moses law n the holy days n sabbath dayS wers all part of moses law I dont believe he was talking about the commandments of God becuz before the 10commandments were the moses law.
That's right, read the text and don't forget to read the context. Read and hear but receive only the good, that's if you have the Spirit to understand.
Anyone can feed the hungry, clothe those who are naked but without faith,love and repentance, what's the difference from those who are believers and sinners who don't know Christ as their true Savior?
@PostGlacialRebound. I was also thinking about your reference to Romans 7:25. What Paul was effectively stating was that the flesh cannot serve god. We must worship God in spirit and truth. In addition, Paul was speaking to the weakness of the flesh, and the fact that even he was subject to it. However, if you feel it means something else.. Then so be it... I can agree to disagree...
@PostGlacialRebound Hmmm, so you would say that the fact that Paul was addressed by the Lord Jesus himself (Acts 9:4 - And he fell to the earth, and heard a voice saying unto him, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me?), he is somehow disqualified? In talking to Peter, Jesus stated in John 21:22 - "Jesus saith unto him, If I will that he tarry till I come, what is that to thee? follow thou me". I can't change individual thinking, only Jesus can do that.. As he did with Paul.
The tragic thing here is that many attempt to validate old testament over the new. Take a look at Hebrews 8:13 - In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away. " The old testament is there to help us understand what the rules were before Jesus' arrival, but many don't understand that Jesus himself confirmed that we ought to live by what the apostles had written (John 17:20).. And wasn't Paul, an apostle???
@nhprman Hmmm, Paul being or not being the 13th apostle doesn't really have much to do with the fact that God chose Paul. Acts 9:13-15: "Then Ananias answered, Lord, I have heard by many of this man, how much evil he hath done to thy saints at Jerusalem: And here he hath authority from the chief priests to bind all that call on thy name. But the Lord said unto him, Go thy way: for he is a chosen vessel unto me, to bear my name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel:
@mikemillion2000 Let's ignore Jesus, who said he chose just 12 apostles. I have little confidence in the writer of Acts, a propagandist for Paul (who nonetheless, gives a different take on the Jerusalem Conference than Paul in Galatians. But again, no matter) and NONE in the forged 2nd Peter, which basically says "Paul was totally right," when in other places Paul says Peter (who walked with Jesus for 3 years) opposed Paul vigorously, as did the Jerusalem Disciples, who KNEW Jesus, personally.
@nhprman Ignore Jesus, kinda hard to do, when we know he CHOSE Paul. Considering your 'confidence' in SOME scriptures, one of the things that I'm not hearing is about having faith. "Hebrews 11:1 Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen." While some opt to tear down what Christ established, they don't consider that the scriptures are written by 'inspired men of god', so if we don't believe that how can we even say we have faith or that we serve God?
@mikemillion2000 Paul not being one of the Twelve is an extremely important point, since Jesus chose just 12. These 12 rejected Paul in Jerusalem and told him to go talk to the unbelievers, but even then, if you believe Paul, they sent emissaries to challenge his "lawless" teachings to the Jews in the diaspora (that's the 'other gospel' Paul rails about.) I believe the author of Acts is a propagandist for Paul and doubt seriously his legitimacy. His conversion story is also full of holes.
@mikemillion2000 The REAL tragedy is that many assert that Paul's teachings are ABOVE Jesus's re: the Old Testament, like when he himself said that to follow the LAW was the way to salvation, and that we would be judged according to our DEEDS (i.e. our actions/WORKS) and that to follow the COMMANDMENTS was the way to be saved, not faith alone. Many are putting the NT letters of Paul above the Torah/Law, which will "not pass away" acc. to Jesus, Moses & all the other Prophets.
@nhprman I don't put Paul above Jesus. However, I do know that the Lord chose Paul. That I believe. I am convinced by the scriptures that Paul was chosen of the Lord (on the road to damascus, heh heh), and that Paul executed the work that Jesus had him to do. The old covenant is NOT the way to salvation. Else then why would Jesus himself say "I AM the way, the truth and the life, no man come to the father, but by me'. And Jesus did not give us salvation in the old testament, but in the new
@mikemillion2000 We'll disagree about Paul's chosenness. As this great video & others show, he is inconsistent, boastful, prideful, dismissive of the Original Twelve Disciples that Jesus chose & I believe, mischaracterizes the Law as something hideously burdensome & illegitimate. Jesus himself taught that the Law will never pass away & that people who add burdens to it (Pharisees) are blind guides. Jesus taught a way BACK to proper Law observance - with one's heart. But did NOT end it.
@nhprman There is no video or opinion thatr can take the place of scripture and what things Jesus did on this earth. Yes, he chose 12 apostles as we know, but I'm looking for scripture references where you say Jesus said the law will never pass away, and I see none, but if that is your choice to question the NT, then I understand. However, I know and believe that when Jesus returns, he will clear up any doubts and misunderstandings to the orders he gave to the apostles and to Paul.
@mikemillion2000 That's an easy one: Matt. 5:17-18 (NIV) "Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished." I believe that's all in the New Testament.
Lastly, if you oppose Paul then you oppose the Holy Spirit, the comforter who Christ said would come, AND you oppose that God has set up and established the rulers and kingdoms of this earth. While I do in fact disagree with the latter, as I believe God to be good and not evil, I cannot go against the Spirit or the gifts of the Spirit therein described in the divinely inspired works of the Holy Spirit through the apostle Paul.
And yes that is what I will Jesus (not Yehushua as I haven't denied his name) when I see him. YHVH is probably the work of satan for the Jews ran after pagan gods and made pagan idols. We know not that this Yeshua name is genuine, all I know is that Jesus appears in the bible I have read and he came to take away the kingdom from the Jews and Messianics.
@Phaedron777 "YHVH is probably the work of satan" ??? WHAT? Jesus believed that the GREATEST commandment was loving YHVH. He never denied God nor His commandments, as given to Moses. You, sir, are mistaken because you believe in the Rejectionist Paul more than even God, and certainly believe in Paul's words more than Jesus himself taught.
Is that what's going to keep me? As far as I'm concerned it was in God's divinely inspired word the Bible therefore it's good enough for me. If God wanted it any other way he should have interveneed because the bible is truly the infallible word of God. Therefore Paul is correct and Justified.
Next you'll be saying "it's not about Jesus death but we are saved by his life and the way he lived." If the law were enough to save, then for what reason has Christ died? If the law were enough then his death was meaningless... Plus not everyone can do "works" not one who is locked away in prison for example. Our works are worthless before God, it is Christ alone who saves.
Paul taught against circumcision, Acts 21:21 The book of James was written for the trial of Paul at the church of Ephesus, Jesus spoke of the trial of Paul and Barnabas in Rev 2:2. Show me in any of Paul's letters,.not a single word Paul wrote gives the actual teaching of Jesus, nor does he mention even one of his parables; instead Paul spreads his own philosophy and his own ideas. Paul never knew Jesus. Testing of a true prophet of God, found in Deut 13:1-10. Jesus passed it. Paul failed!
Truth, when used at the right time, can destroy Christianity and make the whole world Zionist. Except that today the church is universal and zion is become the synagogue of satan, the one world order. Just as in Christ's first coming they were ruled by wicked pharisees, so the world will return to the old testament law with Yeshua merely the sin sacrifice, but the ones who say they are Jews are the house of satan. Therefore let us recognize the Holy Spirit working through Paul.
Don't be so easily moved, tossed to and fro with every whim of doctrine. This girl is just mixed up. she is listening to someone that is mixed up and that person is listening to someone that doesn't know. We know that Jesus fulfilled the Law, and it is in Jesus that we have faith in, it's the WORD of God. Speak the Word and be happy people. You can't work to be saved. Have faith in Jesus. He broke the curse over your life. Trust in His work!
Its sad to hear people didputing Paul's writings, when you read his letters very carefully you discover that they're divine, whoever can't see that needs prayers.
What about the law that say you must stone your children and the girl thats not virgin. And other traditions of caninites that they added what about them saying they added so many laws that we can not remember them? And should we remove them or leave it as a test for our children along with the demon of Quran
Paul leading us to hell, give me a break you so called scholars even misrepresent hell. If we at the end times do not let the holy spirit speak through us then this is the unforgiveable sin. The antichrist will be here to claim to be Jesus but he is not. Its that simple we can get caught up in Paul all we want but he will not lead us to Hell which is not the lake of fire or consuming fire in which we no longer exist.
Why Put Emphasis On Magnifying Your Own Office If You Are Originally Part Of The Office That The Messiah Have Set Up?
Also For The Spiritually Discerned, Notice How In The Hollywood Movie Called, Peter And Paul, Who Played The Part Of Paul? The Exact Same Man Who Play Only Evil Parts In Movies....Hannibal, Hannibal 2, And Whatever Else Evil Movie That's Out....What's That Most Recent Movie.
SHE IS COMPLETELY RIGHT 100%.....Thus, There Would Have Been No Controversy From The Start About Pauls Teachings; Paul Says, That He Is The Apostle Of The Gentiles....
Romans 11:13 - For I speak to you Gentiles, inasmuch as I am the apostle of the Gentiles, I magnify mine office:
Note: "Of" Means The Exact Same Things As "From" So In Saying Apostle Of (From) The Gentiles Is Saying He Is Another Kind Of Apostle; Then Continuing With The Statement, He Magnifies His Own Office.
same thing wit romans 3:27. please understand,dis letter is written 2 da ROMANS. and again,the "law/works" paul is speaking of is da levitical laws and da laws dat were given when israel was brought out of bondage,u get it now?all dat other stuff u pointed out can b easily understood by reading in da CONTEXT and refferin 2 ya comment pg where i cleard up da base of ya mess of your understanding. u kno i love u! stop being stubborn and understand. with all thy getting,get wat?? :)
1st off love,paul's dotrine can b found in 2nd tim 2:8 & da following verses in dat same chapter ,should b read 4 clarification.next: to understanding ephesians 2:8,da WHOLE chapter must b read! da "faith" paul was reffering to can b found in romans 10:117! also,paul was SPEAKING to da GENTILES, as seen in verse 11 of ephesians 2nd chapter. da "works" he was reffering 2 was da law given 2 da ISRAELITES! u understand now??u wouldnt have such a hard time understanding if u read in CONTEXT.
wow.....read the entire Ephesians..he teaches not to sin
Eph 4:26-28 Be ye angry, and sin not: let not the sun go down upon your wrath: (27) Neither give place to the devil. (28) Let him that stole steal no more: but rather let him labour, working with his hands the thing which is good, that he may have to give to him that needeth.
If it is true that if a person breaks one of the commandments that person is also guilty of breaking all the commandments - How much more if a person only accepts the teachings of 1 of God's prophets instead of them all or vice versa - a person accepts all but 1 of God's prophets to be legit? There's no margin for error. One is either with God or against God. If the spirit of God is within a person, they will recognize through discernment that Paul's teachings are of God.
If it is true that if a person breaks one of the commandments that person is also guilty of breaking all the commandments - How much more if a person only accepts the teachings of 1 of God's prophets instead of them all or vice versa - a person accepts all but 1 of God's prophets to be legit? There's no margin for error. One is either with God or against God.
you are just clueless and have been taught error. paul is not talking about disobeying the law. The new covenant is based on the law of LOVE wich is higher than the old testament law. when one fulfills the law of love no law is ever broken. further even thoughts that would not be considered a break of the law are corrected. You guys really need to repent and get right. this borders on intentional intelectual dishonesty.
do steal car= you been asked to live normal live. If you stole car your enter into sin. paul is showing you line. law prove that this people were not a normal .
steal= jail you
not steal= normal life
given money= your a good human
there is line between good person and normal person. this line paul pointing out.
people are think about line bad person and normal person.Law is line between good and bad. bad people cross it brcome good. good person cross it become bad
THESE ARE HARD ACCUSATIONS PRESENTED! YOU SHOULD BE MORE CAREFUL OF YOUR JUDGMENTS BECAUSE JUDGMENTS WILL RETURN ON THE HEAD OF THOSE WHO SPEAK ERROR OR LOOK TO CORRUPT THE GOSPEL!!! BRING JUDGMENTS FROM THE MOST HIGH NOT YOUR OWN MIND. LET THE HOLY SPIRIT DESCERN THROUGH THE SCRIPTURES NOT OPINIONS!
Paul taught the law and in fact QUOTED from the commands in Exodus. So, this whole video is based on FASLE INFO regarding Paul, who was an Apostle chosen by God.
Paul said, "Do we make void the law that grace may abound? NO! Rather, WE ESTABLISH THE LAW." Why did Paul say this? Because he taught that breaking God's law is "SIN" which leads to death, Ro. 6:23.
KEEPING THE LAW is "NOT SINNING", which is what true believers practice ... and what Paul taught to do ... KEEP THE LAW.
@blackisraelite9 YOU ARE AN IDIOT CHRISTIANS ARE ISRAELITES IF YOU ARE NOT NEGRO,HISPANICS NATIVE AMERICAN YOU ARE NOT AN ISRAELITE.you prove time and time a again you are a stupid scoffer clown and the law WAS THE SACRIFICIAL LAW AND CERTAIN PARTS OF THE MOSAIC LAW THAT WE COULDN'T KEEP BECAUSE OF OUR CAPTIVITY.YES I AM AN ISRAELITE WHO CAME BACK TO LAWS STATUES AND COMMANDMENT SO YES I AM A CHRISTIAN.AND YOU CANT PRACTICE THE TRUE FORM IN OUR CAPTIVITY YOU CLOWN.YOU ARE DUMB FOR REAL
@blackisraelite9 listen because you lack understanding and show your self to be an idiot you make me have to over post.because you are as dumb as a door nail i told you the law paul was speaking about i guess you cant read too huh?.thats the problem with you scoffers you only see what you want to see.YES I HAVE TO OVER POST BECAUSE I CANNOT HAVE A CONVERSATION WITH AN UNLEARNED PERSON I HAVE TO TEACH A UNLEARNED PERSON.SO IT MAKES NO SENSE SO FORGET IT ALL.THE LORD ISNT DEALING WITH YOU
@blackisraelite9 mathew10:5These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: 6But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. 7And as ye go, preach, saying, The kingdom of heaven is at hand.
i hope you are grasping the concept im going expand on the reasoning behind gentile some more if you want me to expand more let me know ill even get more scriptures
@blackisraelite9 to expand upon that you can only be an Israelite by fathers blood line so the dispersed israelites are the one being called Greeks,not edomites look up the word "Hellenist" tell me what they say.now look at James 1:1James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting...scattered israelites correct
mathew15:24But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
@blackisraelite9 romans10:12For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.
now when you see this you have to understand history and the law.By Jewish law is an Israelite was uncircumcised etc and didn't follow the mosaic law he was cut off from his people look upon as a "GENTILE" so because of the different captivities you had Israelites living by gentile customs in the lands they dwelt.
@blackisraelite9 romans10:4 ask you self what did Christ fulfill the sacrificial law and brought the nation of Israel back to the father correct.the law he is talking about here is the law of bring an animal to to be given for sin.that is the law that was nailed to the cross not the laws of don't commit adultery,don't eat pork etc.the sacrificial law was ended that's why they called Jesus the lamb of God the ultimate sacrifice to bring us back.why you think the temple veil split at his death?
@blackisraelite9 YES I HAVE TO USE ALL CAPS BECAUSE IT GETS THE POINT ACROSS FOR YOU TO PAY ATTENTION AND FOCUS,but since you asked i will not use them. ok brother please forgive me for saying this but if the bible wasn't being read like a fairy tale book you wouldn't even have to ask me that question.i'm not even disappointed in you as the female who did this video that is where the real disgrace is.she suppose to know the scripture to know better but that shows her teacher failed her
@blackisraelite9 LISTEN THE MOST HIGH ISN'T DEALING WITH YOU SO YOU WONT GET IT SO LET IT GO..SOME OF YOU ISRAELITES ARE SO FAR GONE YOU HAVE TO BE PUT TO DEATH AND BE REGENERATED.ONLY UNLEARNED STUPID PEOPLE HALF STEPPING CHRISTIANIZE ISRAELITES RUN WITH ALL THIS BULLSHIT BECAUSE THE LORD NEVER IMPARTED UNDERSTANDING TO YOU,BECAUSE HE DOESN'T WANT EVERYONE TO GET IT THAT'S WHY YOU GUYS A RUNNING WITH THE BULLSHIT BECAUSE THE MOST HIGH HAS LET AN UNCLEAN SPIRIT DWELL IN YOU GUYS
THIS PROVES SHE HAS NO UNDERSTANDING 2PETER3:15-16And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you; 16As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.
SPIRITUAL MIND SPIRITUAL THINGS-CARNAL MIND CARNAL THINGS
BUT LETS CUT TO THE REAL ISSUE BECAUSE PAUL SAID A WOMAN SHOULD NOT TEACH,REMAIN SILENT IN THE CHURCH BE SUBJECTED TO HER HUSBAND,SHE WANTS TO DO OTHER WISE SO TO JUSTIFY THIS YOU HAVE TO GET RID OF PAUL FOR THOSE SCRIPTURES NOT TO MATTER.IF PAUL IS FALSE YOU CANT USE ROMAN.CORINTHIAN,EPHESIANS MOST OF THE NEW TESTAMENT WOULD BE FALSE ALSO IT WAS WRITTEN BY A FALSE PROPHET FULL OF DECEIT.THIS WOMAN IS EVIL AND PRIDEFUL,AND YES A WOMAN'S SALVATION COMES THROUGH HER HUSBAND,THIS IS TRUTH
LISTEN PAUL WAS SENT TO THE SCATTERED ISRAELITES THE GENTILES SO THEY WEREN'T A CUSTOM TO CERTAIN LAWS THAT'S WHY IT LOOKS CONTRADICTORY.BUT LETS CUT TO THE REAL ISSUE BECAUSE PAUL SAID A WOMAN SHOULD NOT TEACH,REMAIN SILENT IN THE CHURCH BE SUBJECTED TO HER HUSBAND,SHE WANTS TO DO OTHER WISE SO TO JUSTIFY THIS YOU HAVE TO GET RID OF PAUL FOR THOSE SCRIPTURES NOT TO MATTER.IF PAUL IS FALSE YOU CANT USE ROMAN.CORINTHIAN,EPHESIANS ETC.THIS WOMAN IS EVIL AND PRIDEFUL
The law is holy, it teaches love to man and God. We all want to be better but do forget, and only reminded by the fall. In trying to get better- we get worse, once down- hope for Mercy, then try again just to complete the circle once again. If we are to get better as we live, why the loop? The "gift" of fruit is the knowledge of good and evil, but that knowledge stated - you are naked and there is shame! but God loved them naked as He made them, was He wrong?
didn't Jesus healed on the sabbath? he did, so he 'broke' the law? let's face it the 'old testament' is full of the most pathetic, idiotic laws with so called men of god behaving like monsters and women being treated like slaves with no rights. Jesus is the only one that I like he's nothing like all the other fools.
Jesus stressed the urgency to return to the Father to fulfill His promise to us. That promise was Jesus was going to ask the Father to send His Holy Spirit in My Name.
His gift is the reward for our Faith and serves as our key to the Gates of Heaven and Kingdom of God. If one has Faith, they recieve the gift Jesus promised. I do not think Jesus lied and I can not imagine having Faith without works since Faith is rewarded by the gift which Jesus promised. Jesus doesn't lie.
This is interesting in light of (Mathew) Jesus discussion with "have you not known Me, Philip"
Do you think it is possible to have Faith and not have done works? I tend to feel if one truly has faith, works are inherently part of that faith. Otherwise, ones faith is fairly shallow? I can envision one doing works without faith, which is why if had to choose one or the other Faith be the wiser since it would inherently include works. I really can imagine Faith without?
In Paul's defense I don't think any of Paul's teachings; should have been included in the bible. He wasn't one of the 12 and he never met Jesus. He was no different than the average preacher today. Peter was the rock on which Jesus said he would build his church; not Paul. Its obvious in most of Paul's teachings that he is simply stating his opinion; however it disgust me to see pastors preaching these opinions as factual scriptures. Maybe Paul was secretly working for the Romans(double agent)
@thementalpatient2005 It's obvious to me now that Paul was somebody's agent, either the Romans who protected him or the Pharisees. Maybe he was an agent of both. But seeing that he was originally from Turkey, where Revelation says Satan has his throne, I'd say he was definitely the Evil One's agent.
Paul is not saying to forget the law, he is saying that the law can not save. Also He says to not boast about your works, he does not say don't do works. Works are a product of faith. Only grace can save, then come the works because you have the desire to do the work of Christ. The Pharisees Followed the law, yet Jesus condemned them. Works are a product of Faith which comes from grace which comes from Gods soverign Choice/ election befroe the foundation of the world. Peace
@whinda4702 The Israelites transgressed the Law. Yet YHWH still found a person worthy to follow them. So I don't think it has anything to do with a matter of *only containing Grace without works.
To not keep the Law is to not believe in following the laws of the land. The Old Testament states that repeatedly.
Paul was basically trying to side with the GREEK population who didn't understand the law. But I do agree one cannot judge a person based on the LAW if they aren't keeping it fully.
@whinda4702 What this speaker says is true. Act 15:20 Paul is almost stoned by the Nazarenes (Jesus' Church). It is both faith AND works that are required. The Roman Christians have tried it for 2000 years and the results are in - its a fraud. The Vatican (and Protestantism) have more blood on their hands than the pagan Romans (well, actually they are one and the same). Paulianity and Jesus christianity are different religions.
@clarkewi You couldn't be more wrong. The law was NEVER the means of salvation, Paul is merely restating it, showing how Christ UPGRADED the spiritual life due to His Session. But the anti-Paul people never do understand the OT. That's why they can NEVER COMPREHEND anything in the New One.
Y'all will never grow up spirituaLly. Peter said so, recommending Paul's writings in the last half of his letter. BYE.
@brainouty Keeping God's Laws (not ceremonial laws) is required of Christians. Acts 15:21 James states what is required of gentiles in order to come to God. Paul came to Jesus' church the Nazarenes to spread the good news many decades after Jesus' crucifixion. Paul has no authority (and never intended) to over rule the 12 Apostles and "Pillars" - James, Peter and John. "Faith without works is dead letter" - James. Roman "Paulian Xtianity" is apostasy - the Beast of John's Revelation.
@clarkewi You couldn't be more wrong. You don't know the Mosaic Law was a POST-SALVATION MATURATION vehicle, now superceded (main theme of the Book of Hebrews, which Paul did NOT write, the Greek writing style is too elegant for Paul).
I don't have time to teach you to read the Bible. Sorry. If you are this confused, it would take me 100 years to straighten you out. So use 1John1:9 and ask GOD to straighten you out on what the heck is brainout talking about. He'll do it.
@brainouty No Jew ever claimed you got saved but by GRACE thru FAITH; no verse in OT ever claims works save. Rather, Isaiah 64:6 & Hebrew 'tainu' of Isa53:6. Mikvah (works) are viewed as rewards ATOP salvation, never its means. If you ask a Jew, 'are you going to heaven', he is to reply 'only God knows'.
By Jesus' day, there was confusion, hence the rich young ruler's question. Notice Christ's response: even if the guy gave up all, that didn't save him; but only 'follow me'. NO WORKS!
@brainouty Sorry, I forgot to add the most vital part: Mosaic Law was never intended to save you. It was a POST-SALVATION way to learn Adonai Elohenu. Moses explains all that in Deut 6 & 30; how to have a good post-salvation life, ON EARTH.
Sacrifices depicted how your salvation would be PAID FOR in future. You named your sins, put your hand on the animal, since you ALREADY BELIEVED Gen 15:6. So it was a REMINDER, never a means.
Paul just REMINDS the reader of OT, like all Bible writers do.
@brainouty no, he did not give all up, he was greived to give it all up and give it to the poor, giving all he had to the poor is an act.have a good day
@mystic81006 please read the comment again. The point was how to be saved, not his reaction. If it helps, I just posted an hour's audio attached to a video called 1RAP, Refuting Anti-Paulinists. I don't have time now to turn the audio into a video. It's a new playlist which I'll enlarge in November.
@clarkewi acully paul meet 2 of the apostles, he threatened even them and there was a fight about it. this is the main reason there is a scripture that says works with out faith is dead.they meet, they fought, becouse of the fauls teachings paul was teaching. do more history about the matter.
@mystic81006 That is exactly correct. Paul "added" his own gospel to the gospel of the Nazarenes and to Jesus or at least that is how Paul has been interpreted. Peter said that Paul was easily misinterpreted. Acts 15:20 also lets us know that a compromise WAS reached between "The Pillars" James, Peter and John. What needs to be corrected are the pagan, anti torah teachings of Roman Xtianity which hijacked the Nazarene teachings. This is being clarified however it is painful. Keep the Sabbath.
@whinda4702 see my YT study on the false apostle Paul." PAUL THE FALSE APOSTLE "THE BIG TEST" from God" Also my site lasttrumpet org. Paul is a bad guy. Also see web site JesusWordsOnly com. and book by same time written by an attorney and Bible scholar. This will convince you! Blessings Pastor Douglas Nicholson
the moral law---is completely different from the dietary, justice, circumcision etc... laws. Even Jesus said many of these things represent things in Heaven.
I apologize if I seem rude, but this video shows a lack of understanding to the entire letters of Paul. Paul didn't teach against repentance or works, as he was often dealing with Jews who were trying to bring entire converts under the entire law---the only law that applies to all men of all time is the moral law. Romans 8:12-13, 13:8-10
I read a book by a Jewish scholar who doubts that Paul was actually a Pharisee as he claimed. He said Paul's writing style & style of argument can be compared to Pharisee texts, and it looks more as if Paul is doing a rather poor imitation of a Pharisee. The book is called "The Mythmaker" (Paul and the Invention of Christianity) by Hyam Maccoby if you're interested.
1Timothy 1:8 - But we know that the law [is] good, if a man use it lawfully; (1:9 ) - Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, (1:10) - For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine;
1Timothy 2:11 - Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. 1Timothy 2:12 - But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. 1Timothy 2:13 - For Adam was first formed, then Eve. 1Timothy 2:14 - And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression. 1Timothy 2:15 - Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety.
2Peter 3:15 - And account [that] the longsuffering of our Lord [is] salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you; 2Peter 3:16 - As also in all [his] epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as [they do] also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.
Hey man, Paul did not preach against the commandment of Yah. read Rom 3:31, 2:13, 7:12. and in Col 2:14 he was not preaching against the law, he was talking about the ordinances tied to the "BOOK OF THE LAW" the sacrifices. the blood. Harmonizes perfectly dan 9:27. Christ caused the sacrifice and oblation to cease cause he was the perfect sacrifice. Paul kept the Law(Sabbath and Holy days) God knew he had a pride issue thus the purpose of the thorn. May want to reconsider you false apostle claim
The video makes some good points, but if Paul's epistles are not the word of God, then what are they doing in the New Testament? How are we to know whether the Gospels themselves are a credible record of Jesus' words? The authenticity of all the New Testament would have to be questioned, since its canon was established by the early Church. How will you decide?
Good video can't say I disagree with much except the end. The most high does not deal with religion. All man made religions are false and satanic. We are supposed to follow the commandments (all 613 of them) and believe in the Messiah and read the Bible. The Bible is a book that deals with the history of the hebrews (which happen to be black americans not the white khazars in israel), laws, statues and commandments but not religion.
@endofsuffering83 no disrespect, but I wonder if you even understand the definition of religion. Religion is the belief in and worship of a god or gods, or any such system of belief and worship, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs. Therefore by its very definition you're practicing a religion whether you accept it or not.
@endofsuffering83 also the very word religion is used throughout the bible for example Acts 26:5, Galatians 1:13, 1 Maccabees 2:22. Also Judaism itself is used throughout the bible. When Galatians 1:13-14 speaks of "the Jews religion," the Greek text reads "iudaismo" (i.e. Judaism!). The same is the case with 2 Maccabees 2:21, 8:1 & 14:38. The King James Bible also renders the word "Judaism" in 2 Maccabees 2:21 & 14:38.
@VolkHeart2009 I think you misunderstood what I meant which is very simple. We were given a book and commandments to follow. Anything besides that leads to confusion and is used to confuse and to keep you away from salvation. I couldn't have kept it simpler.
One last thing paul teaches we are saved by grace and not by works yes thats true Paul teaches that we should not use our freedom to come closer to god NOT TO INDULGE in sin. he is saying we shud repent from are wickedness not that we have to. If we ahve to repen from partying drinking chasing women well bascially repent for being human well I am sorry Salvation is not a gift and the word of god is defiantly a lie
@virtuallad06 Hey man, Paul did not preach against the commandment of Yah. read Rom 3:31, 2:13, 7:12. and in Col 2:14 he was not preaching against the law, he was talking about the ordinances tied to the "BOOK OF THE LAW" the sacrifices. the blood. Harmonizes perfectly dan 9:27. Christ caused the sacrifice and oblation to cease cause he was the perfect sacrifice. Paul kept the Law(Sabbath and Holy days) God knew he had a pride issue thus the purpose of the thorn.
May God richly bless you my beloved for STATING what many are deliberately DENYING! Paul NEVER preached against God's commandments! Roman 3:31, 7:7 & MANY OTHER SCRIPTURES testify to that!
Peter said in 2 Peter 3:16 that Paul's letters contain some things that are hard to understand & that THE IGNORANT & UNSTABLE DISTORT THEM AS THEY DO OTHER SCRIPTURES TO THEIR OWN DESTRUCTION!
Paul has NOTHING TO DO with antinomianism. He is a Jew among Jews used by God for holy purposes!
Well the Gspel of john is also The same teachings as Paul Believe in jesus chrsit and thou shalt be saved thats the gospel Jon believes in and I beleive in accroding to Matthew Jesus practically says John is my most knowledgabe and faithful disciple. U h8 paul teachings cuz if people learn Pauls teachings u lose control over them. U call urself mornign sun I beleive in isaih 14 Lucifer is refrered to SON OF THE MORNING star??? the reason why I left chrsitiantity is becasue of all this bs
If Paul is a false apostle when then james and john are also cuz james writes to the jews about trying to follow the law and how if u offend in one way u offend in all and if ya folow the holy scripture of love thy neighbour as thy self ye do well. So is james a false prophet??/ Tell me this u paul haters jews especailly (I am NOT a jew h8er and i am NOT talking about all Jews) believe that the gospel ACCORDING to John and Matthew are the 2 true gospels I am sorry it's one or the other tbc
I am not a christian but a former christian and I can tell ya now the reason why people don't like Paul cuz Paul teachings are lets a defuser of there fear tactics. paul teaches that we have to believe in chrsit and what he did for us on the cross to be saved so therefore people no longer arewalk in fear. But mans lust for control over man takes over these h8ers and therefore they h8 paul. u prob find these very same people who say u must follow moses law which is impossible to keep to be cont
I have just started watching these videos and I did not know that people even looked at paul as false. Now I do not believe he was a false Apostle, some of the stuff he says I do not fully understand but when he says justified by works he is talking about all the laws Moses spoke of and not the original 10 commandments. You must remember paul was an Israelite and the law of Moses was probably still in effect. No man can keep the entire law of Moses, but every man can keep the 10 commandments.
@RichKnight2010, that's because christinity is a false relegion, just like the rest of them. For God is not a relegion, but spirit, and thos who know Him must worship Him in spirit and in truth, shalom.
@RichKnight2010 Hey i have an earlier post, but to comment on what you said, I am a Christian and I call God by his name Yah. Read psalms 68:4. The word hallelujah means praise ye Yah. Im sure you say it every time you gather together with other believers. Now folk got it twisted cause you can't find no bible that will condemn christianity or the term christian. 1pet 4:16. I also know that in aramaic Jesus name was yehowshuwah but i also understand laws of transliteration and translation.
(continued) But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the Lord, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying Know the Lord: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the Lord.' Jeremiah 31:31-34
'Behold the days come, saith the Lord, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt, which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the Lord: (continued)
The Bible states in 2 Corinthians 5:17: "Therefore if any man is in Christ, he is a new creature; the old things are passed away; behold, new things have come."
When we repent of our sins and our saved by grace we are going to want by nature to do good works pleasing unto the Lord.
Paul is so very misunderstood! we have to consider who he was preaching to. remember what peter said about paul's writings. Paul upheld the law! Just remember he was a pharisee who saw us destroy the law with no faith!
This is a good topic. We should discuss more. i thought negatively of Paul as well.
Good evening my beloved's, I to have been hash on paul, so let me give my most humble apologies, and if the Lord choose him, who am i to say different. Let God be true and everyman a liar! So please forgive my ignorance. for i too am learning about my Savior and His Gospel of salvation. So let's us agree to disagree in peace and love. For as paul has so humbley stated, i die daily, and everyday i live in the flesh i live it to Christ who also gave himself for me, shalom.
I'm printing out all these comments and sending them back in time to Jesus .I'm also sending an ink pen and notebooks .Ive told him he has to write down what actualy happens to avoid all the endless fighting. Jesusjust smiled and said what he really needs is an electric rasor .Said it was just people putting him on a cult like pedastal .
ok mr smarty pants. If your so perfect in Jehovah's law - and have completed it - why are you on a computer? Why have you defiled yourself with an idol?
Your talking about salvation from - judging by your own presented outward standards and logic - a perspective of one who has not been saved and who does not know salvation.
A hypocrite is one who does NOTt have the Torah of Yahweh in his heart 'coz the Torah is very truth that the Spirit of truth approves.
Once you love the Torah of Yahweh into your heart, and have the commandments in the Torah in your mouth, you shall bear the fruits of righteous.
On the other hand, if you dont live by the comandments of Yah, it proves that you dont receive the Word of Yahwh in your heart.,,,then you are not only fruitless, but also bear bad fruits.
nothing is wrong with Paul. his doctrine is not saved by faith without works, his doctrine is christ was the new covenant to his people and we were no longer justified by the law and sacrifice. his death was a final sacrifice which brought grace(mercy) cus in the world to come(today) the law would be near impossible to keep fully we'd be scattered and sacrifices in tha law would be unattainable, where can u get a ox or lamb everytime u broke tha law today. paul helped introduce the new covanant
mixumup1 3 days ago
it isn't the time of the Ram anymore, it is the time of the fishes moving into the time of aquarius, jesus will deliver his people into the age of aquarius jus as moses(Ram) delivered his people to joshua. Paul teaches no longer is it the time of moses, its all about christ,, which was romans 8:4 to obey gods laws in spirit. gala 5:25 if we live by spirit, walk in the spirit. Gala 5:22 fruit of spirit is love.. what is love? 2 john 1:6 and this is love, that we walk after his commandments
mixumup1 3 days ago
Works of faith come after salvation through grace. Works of the law attempt to attain salvation. Simple stuff really don't be decieved
atomicprayer 6 days ago
Works of the law and works of faith are not the same.
atomicprayer 6 days ago
What you don't understand is: works are merely 'evidence' of faith. ... not the faith itself. Just as "sinning" is evidence of fallen nature, but is not the genetic/spiritual flaw itself. Paul was merely saying that what God gave, He gave without a condition attached long before you believed and started doing good. Thus ur 'good works' had nothing to do with *His DECISION* to offer salvation. Works are the *indicators* of your belief. He didn't chose to offer salvation *because* of them.
BiologicalUnit2380 2 weeks ago in playlist More videos from morningsun29
5:00 He's basically saying "Shaddup Pharisees, any law that is or isn't being followed is about God. Stop judging people and taking it personally, it's not about you."
BurningMountin 2 weeks ago
One very important thing needs to be made about Paul. When Paul spoke out against the law, he was speaking out against the Laws of the Pharisees, and "Traditions of men" NOT the ten commandments. Jesus was killed for speaking out against the EXACT same laws that the Pharisees held so dear. It seems Paul haters are having a hard time transitioning from Law to Grace. Pauls writings are so beautiful! The love he had for his brothers and sisters in Christ was so tender and sweet..made me cry.
BurningMountin 2 weeks ago
6:07 He's saying that the actual removing of the skin is nothing, it becomes somthing only because God was being obeyed in the process. If you take away circumcision, (which in itself had no spiritual signifigance, only what was attributed to it) obeying God still remains. It's all about the spirit in which we obey the commandments, and not the act preformed to obey. Judas ate of Jesus' bread in the wrong spirit, just like there are many people nodays following Christ in the wrong spirit.
BurningMountin 2 weeks ago
I think you are in absolute ignorance and distort Paul's teachings as Peter spoke about in 2Pet 3:16. The other apostles took him in as a brother in Christ and discerned by the spirit that he was speaking the truth. It's apparent that you do not have the spirit of truth because you cannot determine what is truth and what is not truth and create lies and heresies to distort the truth of God.
truthisyesu 1 month ago
Philippians 1
And this is my prayer: that your love may abound more and more in knowledge and depth of insight,
10 so that you may be able to discern what is best and may be pure and blameless for the day of Christ,
11 filled with the fruit of righteousness that comes through Jesus Christ—to the glory and praise of God.
Click the link on my channel if you are looking for information to help you with your christian walk.
Garrison5402 1 month ago
Your conclusion is invalid.
The "if-then conditional" does not always appear in traditional "if-then" form, but in the case of Matt 19:17 the hypothesis has been specifically identified.
IF thou wilt enter into life (P), (THEN) keep the commandments. (Q)
P -> Q
If Paul is incorrect in Rom 3:28 and Gal 3:11, then LOGICALLY CONCLUDE the truth of the Antecedent (P) without Affirming the Consequent. (Q)
The Apostle Paul's words are valid.
PrinceWalter 1 month ago
We are saved by the Death of Jesus. One who does not love the death and suffering of Jesus shall not enter Paradise. We are saved by rejoicing in the pain and humiliation of Christ. Apostle loved the torment Jesus went through like no other Apostle. Apostle himself allowed himself to be humiliated by being probed, imprisoned, stripped naked and violated in front of women and children, bathed in feces and urine he wrote the Holy Testament while in chains! Glorious.
PastorBenGurion 1 month ago
And I see no point in keeping the Sabbath day. Why a specific day?. The important thing is to get some rest.
chemerich 1 month ago
We cannot earn salvation by our own works, because no one is good, except God. We simply don't know what is good. Instead of trying to do good, we should rather try to not sin. Circumcision is meaningless, cruel and is a work of the flesh (sin).
chemerich 1 month ago
So Jesus is not good. Right?
1968avayang 2 months ago
Why is it that I who was raised a baptist yet after I had studied the writings of the Apostle Paul came away from it with the understanding that we are saved by grace not by our works yet we are to strive to obey His Holy law not for salvation but rather because we love God/Jesus and His Holy Laws. So we are to keep His Holy Laws not in the hopes of gain, but out of love for Him and His Laws. Now I ask you which of these are greater? Keeping His laws for gain or because of our love for Him?
Fitzlight62 3 months ago
29 people need aren't going to get holy spirit oil for their lamps in the day they beg us for it...
Phaedron777 3 months ago in playlist More videos from morningsun29
For example, in Romans 7:7 Paul declares the purpose of God's law "Well then, am I suggesting that the law of God is sinful? Of course not! In fact, it was the law that showed me my sin. I would never have known that coveting is wrong if the law had not said, "You must not covet.". And Paul was very clear that we should not keep on sinning after we receive grace. Also, Paul wrestled with rabbinical teachings which both Jesus and Paul taught we should get rid of.
Mofi25 3 months ago
morningsun29, you bring out very good points in your video, thanks. What I disagree with you is that Paul was teaching that we can break God's law. I don't see that in his writings and I think you are misunderstanding some of the verses you point to. Very understandable since most Christians interpret them that way.
I think Paul was mostly trying to explain to the Jews of his day that it wasn't their works that justified them, just like obeying the law won't make you innocent if you are guilty.
Mofi25 3 months ago
You fail to understand that we are living in the dispensation of Grace, not the dispensation of law where works were required to prove your faith, you have been over taken by seducing spirits.
DTPetrucci123490th 4 months ago
Paul's writings are misinterpreted. For example, the lord called on him in a dream to rise and eat, but he said that he doesn't eat anything unclean (even though it was talking about men). Also, regarding circumcision, he was trying to express that circumcision doesn't matter, because you have to keep ALL of God's laws (not just a specific few) that's why the verse is read but may seem like a contradiction at the ending.
poisonedaces 4 months ago
@poisonedaces
It was Peter that was commanded to raise and eat not Paul.
Fitzlight62 3 months ago
Take notice that the Apostle Paul was not rebuked by any of the other Apostles of that time, not even the Apostle Peter whom the Apostle Paul corrected. for his actions concerning the gentiles which angered Peter so that he called a meeting of all the Apostles to discuss the problem and he was found to be in the wrong and it was decided that he, Peter would be the Apostle unto the Jews while the Apostle Paul would be the Apostle unto the Gentiles.
Fitzlight62 3 months ago
@Fitzlight62 Paul said that the gentiles were given salvation to provoke the Israelites to JEALOUSY. The gentiles are ruling all over the earth, this is their salvation. The gentiles in regards to Peter/Paul incident were Israelites from the northern kingdom who were in captivity and started to live just like the gentiles, so they were called gentiles. Gentiles are not saved. Paul was not false, people just don't understand his writings and Peter said that would happen
poisonedaces 3 months ago
Circumcision is of a work of the flesh under the old covenant that was broken by but (again) Matthew 5 Christ tells us that it is our hearts that are judged bc we're incapable of keeping the law and Mat19:16no one is good. Gal5:3-4Paul is sayingChrist came and kept the law for us bc we couldnt, but if you are still trying to do something you cant and that Christ already did for you its like having a free pass or gift(Eph2:8) that Christ gave you but you refuse it and try to do it of yourself.
SuperJeaux 5 months ago
OT Hos6:6 Gods delights in loyalty not sacrifices (sacrifices r part of old covenant) its your heart that God wants not your works. in Jonah, Ninevah is forgiven for repenting which is the same Christ asks of us. Ninevah had no works but were wicked. All God required was belief Jona3:5 and repent 3:10.
SuperJeaux 5 months ago
Most all of the verses n the video are taken out of their context and not elaborated on which is misleading
Ro14:5 is speaking about judging your brothers. that we should not judge our brothers bc one regards the day and one doesnt but it will be left up to the Holy Spirit which is our conscience. 14:14-15 Paul tells us the reason for this. By our actions if our brother is hurt then we are no longer acting out of love (which is the greatest commandment, greater than keeping the sabbath holy)
SuperJeaux 5 months ago
Col2:16 Paul uses a yearly, monthly, and weekly expression through the traditions that is used throughout the OT explained in Lev. 23:1-24. and reiterated in1Chr. 23:31, 2Chr2:4, Ez 45:17 & others. But Col2:17 (which is left out, destroying the context) Paul is saying that these traditions are merely a shadow of Christ and you can rest in them but why not rest in the actual Christ? The OT holds many foreshadowings of Christ, the basis of the traditions holding many of them.
SuperJeaux 5 months ago
This video also implies that James in his letter to the 12tribes he is speaking to Paul instead of to the 12 tribes. if this was so every time James writes the word "You" he would be speaking to Paul thus the letter would be addressed accordingly. Obviously this isn't the case, not only bc it's addressed to the 12 but also Paul in Gal. 5:6 speaks of faith working through love. He recognizes that works are important,but they do not justify.Our works are from our grace-changed hearts after salvatn
SuperJeaux 5 months ago
Jn14:15"if you love me you will keep my commadments" Love of Christ comes before the works.Our faith does not reflect our works but our works reflect our faith. Our works are just out of our obidience but are not what saves us. We need His grace and salvation to even be capable of loving Him and doing good works. Isaiah 64:6 "our righteous deeds are like filthy rags" 1cor7:18 the very verse you quoted says to follow the commandments. circumcision is nt a commandment bt n the Oldcovenant
SuperJeaux 5 months ago
I see alot of false interpretations of the God inspired scriptures of Paul. 1st in Gal 2:21 he does not say if you keep the commadments Christ died in vain but if you believe that you are justified by the commandments He died needlessly which is true. Christ told us Himself we cannot keep the commandments. Matthew 5 informs us that it is our hearts that are judged with sin. If we could be saved by the law then why did Christ die?
SuperJeaux 5 months ago
Also the real church is not a building acts 7:48 our body is. The catholics created the tithing. The roots wasnt true becuz the african kings sold them to the europeans so they wouldnt used their natural resources to sell. Slavery was created by the epgytians n Africans n has always been that way.
NSHouston19 6 months ago
@NSHouston19; Gods word says, Deuteronomy 26:12
When you have finished paying all the tithe of your produce the third year, which is the year of tithing, and have given it to the Levite, the stranger and the sojourner, the fatherless, and to the widow, that they may eat within your towns and be filled,
Deuteronomy 26:11-13 (in Context) Deuteronomy 26 (Whole Chapter) Duties of the Priest to be present at and supervise the tithing. Any money was to go to the above named as well.
Faithfull14ever 5 months ago
Paul is talking about the moses law n the holy days n sabbath dayS wers all part of moses law I dont believe he was talking about the commandments of God becuz before the 10commandments were the moses law.
NSHouston19 6 months ago
That's right, read the text and don't forget to read the context. Read and hear but receive only the good, that's if you have the Spirit to understand.
julieturcios41 6 months ago
Anyone can feed the hungry, clothe those who are naked but without faith,love and repentance, what's the difference from those who are believers and sinners who don't know Christ as their true Savior?
julieturcios41 6 months ago
Paul was saying that you can't get into heaven with works alone.
And Jesus was saying depart from me
Those who work iniquity
Works without faith and faith without love
Workers of iniquity are those who Do not preach repentance to save those who are
In sin.
julieturcios41 6 months ago
@PostGlacialRebound. I was also thinking about your reference to Romans 7:25. What Paul was effectively stating was that the flesh cannot serve god. We must worship God in spirit and truth. In addition, Paul was speaking to the weakness of the flesh, and the fact that even he was subject to it. However, if you feel it means something else.. Then so be it... I can agree to disagree...
mikemillion2000 6 months ago
@PostGlacialRebound Hmmm, so you would say that the fact that Paul was addressed by the Lord Jesus himself (Acts 9:4 - And he fell to the earth, and heard a voice saying unto him, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me?), he is somehow disqualified? In talking to Peter, Jesus stated in John 21:22 - "Jesus saith unto him, If I will that he tarry till I come, what is that to thee? follow thou me". I can't change individual thinking, only Jesus can do that.. As he did with Paul.
mikemillion2000 6 months ago
The tragic thing here is that many attempt to validate old testament over the new. Take a look at Hebrews 8:13 - In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away. " The old testament is there to help us understand what the rules were before Jesus' arrival, but many don't understand that Jesus himself confirmed that we ought to live by what the apostles had written (John 17:20).. And wasn't Paul, an apostle???
mikemillion2000 6 months ago
@mikemillion2000 Paul was the 13th "apostle." Jesus chose only 12.
nhprman 6 months ago
@nhprman Hmmm, Paul being or not being the 13th apostle doesn't really have much to do with the fact that God chose Paul. Acts 9:13-15: "Then Ananias answered, Lord, I have heard by many of this man, how much evil he hath done to thy saints at Jerusalem: And here he hath authority from the chief priests to bind all that call on thy name. But the Lord said unto him, Go thy way: for he is a chosen vessel unto me, to bear my name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel:
mikemillion2000 6 months ago
@mikemillion2000 Let's ignore Jesus, who said he chose just 12 apostles. I have little confidence in the writer of Acts, a propagandist for Paul (who nonetheless, gives a different take on the Jerusalem Conference than Paul in Galatians. But again, no matter) and NONE in the forged 2nd Peter, which basically says "Paul was totally right," when in other places Paul says Peter (who walked with Jesus for 3 years) opposed Paul vigorously, as did the Jerusalem Disciples, who KNEW Jesus, personally.
nhprman 6 months ago
@nhprman Ignore Jesus, kinda hard to do, when we know he CHOSE Paul. Considering your 'confidence' in SOME scriptures, one of the things that I'm not hearing is about having faith. "Hebrews 11:1 Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen." While some opt to tear down what Christ established, they don't consider that the scriptures are written by 'inspired men of god', so if we don't believe that how can we even say we have faith or that we serve God?
mikemillion2000 6 months ago
@mikemillion2000 Paul not being one of the Twelve is an extremely important point, since Jesus chose just 12. These 12 rejected Paul in Jerusalem and told him to go talk to the unbelievers, but even then, if you believe Paul, they sent emissaries to challenge his "lawless" teachings to the Jews in the diaspora (that's the 'other gospel' Paul rails about.) I believe the author of Acts is a propagandist for Paul and doubt seriously his legitimacy. His conversion story is also full of holes.
nhprman 6 months ago
@mikemillion2000 The REAL tragedy is that many assert that Paul's teachings are ABOVE Jesus's re: the Old Testament, like when he himself said that to follow the LAW was the way to salvation, and that we would be judged according to our DEEDS (i.e. our actions/WORKS) and that to follow the COMMANDMENTS was the way to be saved, not faith alone. Many are putting the NT letters of Paul above the Torah/Law, which will "not pass away" acc. to Jesus, Moses & all the other Prophets.
nhprman 6 months ago
@nhprman I don't put Paul above Jesus. However, I do know that the Lord chose Paul. That I believe. I am convinced by the scriptures that Paul was chosen of the Lord (on the road to damascus, heh heh), and that Paul executed the work that Jesus had him to do. The old covenant is NOT the way to salvation. Else then why would Jesus himself say "I AM the way, the truth and the life, no man come to the father, but by me'. And Jesus did not give us salvation in the old testament, but in the new
mikemillion2000 6 months ago
@mikemillion2000 We'll disagree about Paul's chosenness. As this great video & others show, he is inconsistent, boastful, prideful, dismissive of the Original Twelve Disciples that Jesus chose & I believe, mischaracterizes the Law as something hideously burdensome & illegitimate. Jesus himself taught that the Law will never pass away & that people who add burdens to it (Pharisees) are blind guides. Jesus taught a way BACK to proper Law observance - with one's heart. But did NOT end it.
nhprman 6 months ago
@nhprman There is no video or opinion thatr can take the place of scripture and what things Jesus did on this earth. Yes, he chose 12 apostles as we know, but I'm looking for scripture references where you say Jesus said the law will never pass away, and I see none, but if that is your choice to question the NT, then I understand. However, I know and believe that when Jesus returns, he will clear up any doubts and misunderstandings to the orders he gave to the apostles and to Paul.
mikemillion2000 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mikemillion2000 That's an easy one: Matt. 5:17-18 (NIV) "Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished." I believe that's all in the New Testament.
nhprman 6 months ago
the works were the animal sacrificing. you have to study and go into the history to see why he was writing the letter
zipporah144 7 months ago
Lastly, if you oppose Paul then you oppose the Holy Spirit, the comforter who Christ said would come, AND you oppose that God has set up and established the rulers and kingdoms of this earth. While I do in fact disagree with the latter, as I believe God to be good and not evil, I cannot go against the Spirit or the gifts of the Spirit therein described in the divinely inspired works of the Holy Spirit through the apostle Paul.
Phaedron777 7 months ago
@Phaedron777 You come dangerously close to calling Paul the Holy Spirit in your comments.
nhprman 6 months ago
And yes that is what I will Jesus (not Yehushua as I haven't denied his name) when I see him. YHVH is probably the work of satan for the Jews ran after pagan gods and made pagan idols. We know not that this Yeshua name is genuine, all I know is that Jesus appears in the bible I have read and he came to take away the kingdom from the Jews and Messianics.
Phaedron777 7 months ago
@Phaedron777 "YHVH is probably the work of satan" ??? WHAT? Jesus believed that the GREATEST commandment was loving YHVH. He never denied God nor His commandments, as given to Moses. You, sir, are mistaken because you believe in the Rejectionist Paul more than even God, and certainly believe in Paul's words more than Jesus himself taught.
nhprman 6 months ago
Is that what's going to keep me? As far as I'm concerned it was in God's divinely inspired word the Bible therefore it's good enough for me. If God wanted it any other way he should have interveneed because the bible is truly the infallible word of God. Therefore Paul is correct and Justified.
Phaedron777 7 months ago
Next you'll be saying "it's not about Jesus death but we are saved by his life and the way he lived." If the law were enough to save, then for what reason has Christ died? If the law were enough then his death was meaningless... Plus not everyone can do "works" not one who is locked away in prison for example. Our works are worthless before God, it is Christ alone who saves.
Phaedron777 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Paul taught against circumcision, Acts 21:21 The book of James was written for the trial of Paul at the church of Ephesus, Jesus spoke of the trial of Paul and Barnabas in Rev 2:2. Show me in any of Paul's letters,.not a single word Paul wrote gives the actual teaching of Jesus, nor does he mention even one of his parables; instead Paul spreads his own philosophy and his own ideas. Paul never knew Jesus. Testing of a true prophet of God, found in Deut 13:1-10. Jesus passed it. Paul failed!
douglasnvideo 7 months ago
Truth, when used at the right time, can destroy Christianity and make the whole world Zionist. Except that today the church is universal and zion is become the synagogue of satan, the one world order. Just as in Christ's first coming they were ruled by wicked pharisees, so the world will return to the old testament law with Yeshua merely the sin sacrifice, but the ones who say they are Jews are the house of satan. Therefore let us recognize the Holy Spirit working through Paul.
Phaedron777 8 months ago
Don't be so easily moved, tossed to and fro with every whim of doctrine. This girl is just mixed up. she is listening to someone that is mixed up and that person is listening to someone that doesn't know. We know that Jesus fulfilled the Law, and it is in Jesus that we have faith in, it's the WORD of God. Speak the Word and be happy people. You can't work to be saved. Have faith in Jesus. He broke the curse over your life. Trust in His work!
azifitiz 8 months ago
Its sad to hear people didputing Paul's writings, when you read his letters very carefully you discover that they're divine, whoever can't see that needs prayers.
God bless
AFRICA4JC 10 months ago
@AFRICA4JC Paul was a false prophet, I used to defend paul better than most, but now is a different story.
"He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is a shame and a folly unto him"
feliztx 9 months ago
What about the law that say you must stone your children and the girl thats not virgin. And other traditions of caninites that they added what about them saying they added so many laws that we can not remember them? And should we remove them or leave it as a test for our children along with the demon of Quran
mischellewright69 10 months ago
i want to know where is the original bible.
13tharealest 10 months ago
Paul leading us to hell, give me a break you so called scholars even misrepresent hell. If we at the end times do not let the holy spirit speak through us then this is the unforgiveable sin. The antichrist will be here to claim to be Jesus but he is not. Its that simple we can get caught up in Paul all we want but he will not lead us to Hell which is not the lake of fire or consuming fire in which we no longer exist.
tydogg75 11 months ago
Why Put Emphasis On Magnifying Your Own Office If You Are Originally Part Of The Office That The Messiah Have Set Up?
Also For The Spiritually Discerned, Notice How In The Hollywood Movie Called, Peter And Paul, Who Played The Part Of Paul? The Exact Same Man Who Play Only Evil Parts In Movies....Hannibal, Hannibal 2, And Whatever Else Evil Movie That's Out....What's That Most Recent Movie.
AVesselofGod 11 months ago 2
SHE IS COMPLETELY RIGHT 100%.....Thus, There Would Have Been No Controversy From The Start About Pauls Teachings; Paul Says, That He Is The Apostle Of The Gentiles....
Romans 11:13 - For I speak to you Gentiles, inasmuch as I am the apostle of the Gentiles, I magnify mine office:
Note: "Of" Means The Exact Same Things As "From" So In Saying Apostle Of (From) The Gentiles Is Saying He Is Another Kind Of Apostle; Then Continuing With The Statement, He Magnifies His Own Office.
AVesselofGod 11 months ago
romans 10:17. 4 my 1st comment correction,instead of 117.
YAKUBEL 1 year ago
same thing wit romans 3:27. please understand,dis letter is written 2 da ROMANS. and again,the "law/works" paul is speaking of is da levitical laws and da laws dat were given when israel was brought out of bondage,u get it now?all dat other stuff u pointed out can b easily understood by reading in da CONTEXT and refferin 2 ya comment pg where i cleard up da base of ya mess of your understanding. u kno i love u! stop being stubborn and understand. with all thy getting,get wat?? :)
YAKUBEL 1 year ago
Comment removed
YAKUBEL 1 year ago
1st off love,paul's dotrine can b found in 2nd tim 2:8 & da following verses in dat same chapter ,should b read 4 clarification.next: to understanding ephesians 2:8,da WHOLE chapter must b read! da "faith" paul was reffering to can b found in romans 10:117! also,paul was SPEAKING to da GENTILES, as seen in verse 11 of ephesians 2nd chapter. da "works" he was reffering 2 was da law given 2 da ISRAELITES! u understand now??u wouldnt have such a hard time understanding if u read in CONTEXT.
YAKUBEL 1 year ago
Worst interpretation of the writings of Paul that I have ever seen.
It is almost comedy.
When people create Vids like this what are they using for source material?
Any straight-forward reading of the Bible clearly shows that Paul was chosen to bridge the gap between the Old Covenant and the New.
The information being presented in this Vid must have come from some source other than Scripture.
My personal feeling is that someone is trying to discredit Paul.
I can only wonder why.
hammerogod 1 year ago
wow.....read the entire Ephesians..he teaches not to sin
Eph 4:26-28 Be ye angry, and sin not: let not the sun go down upon your wrath: (27) Neither give place to the devil. (28) Let him that stole steal no more: but rather let him labour, working with his hands the thing which is good, that he may have to give to him that needeth.
feliztx 1 year ago
If it is true that if a person breaks one of the commandments that person is also guilty of breaking all the commandments - How much more if a person only accepts the teachings of 1 of God's prophets instead of them all or vice versa - a person accepts all but 1 of God's prophets to be legit? There's no margin for error. One is either with God or against God. If the spirit of God is within a person, they will recognize through discernment that Paul's teachings are of God.
BIGBUBZ4178 1 year ago
If it is true that if a person breaks one of the commandments that person is also guilty of breaking all the commandments - How much more if a person only accepts the teachings of 1 of God's prophets instead of them all or vice versa - a person accepts all but 1 of God's prophets to be legit? There's no margin for error. One is either with God or against God.
BIGBUBZ4178 1 year ago
you are just clueless and have been taught error. paul is not talking about disobeying the law. The new covenant is based on the law of LOVE wich is higher than the old testament law. when one fulfills the law of love no law is ever broken. further even thoughts that would not be considered a break of the law are corrected. You guys really need to repent and get right. this borders on intentional intelectual dishonesty.
TheHellbinder 1 year ago
do steal car= you been asked to live normal live. If you stole car your enter into sin. paul is showing you line. law prove that this people were not a normal .
steal= jail you
not steal= normal life
given money= your a good human
there is line between good person and normal person. this line paul pointing out.
people are think about line bad person and normal person.Law is line between good and bad. bad people cross it brcome good. good person cross it become bad
steveniruthaya 1 year ago
heresy
vorticanian 1 year ago
@vorticanian
Agree
hammerogod 1 year ago
The Apostate Paul was cool!
tadpoleposition 1 year ago
THESE ARE HARD ACCUSATIONS PRESENTED! YOU SHOULD BE MORE CAREFUL OF YOUR JUDGMENTS BECAUSE JUDGMENTS WILL RETURN ON THE HEAD OF THOSE WHO SPEAK ERROR OR LOOK TO CORRUPT THE GOSPEL!!! BRING JUDGMENTS FROM THE MOST HIGH NOT YOUR OWN MIND. LET THE HOLY SPIRIT DESCERN THROUGH THE SCRIPTURES NOT OPINIONS!
plesent1 1 year ago
Paul taught the law and in fact QUOTED from the commands in Exodus. So, this whole video is based on FASLE INFO regarding Paul, who was an Apostle chosen by God.
Paul said, "Do we make void the law that grace may abound? NO! Rather, WE ESTABLISH THE LAW." Why did Paul say this? Because he taught that breaking God's law is "SIN" which leads to death, Ro. 6:23.
KEEPING THE LAW is "NOT SINNING", which is what true believers practice ... and what Paul taught to do ... KEEP THE LAW.
loveroflife365 1 year ago
@blackisraelite9 Listen your are a smart person read the bible and figure it out
bloodoutesau1 1 year ago
@blackisraelite9 YOU ARE AN IDIOT CHRISTIANS ARE ISRAELITES IF YOU ARE NOT NEGRO,HISPANICS NATIVE AMERICAN YOU ARE NOT AN ISRAELITE.you prove time and time a again you are a stupid scoffer clown and the law WAS THE SACRIFICIAL LAW AND CERTAIN PARTS OF THE MOSAIC LAW THAT WE COULDN'T KEEP BECAUSE OF OUR CAPTIVITY.YES I AM AN ISRAELITE WHO CAME BACK TO LAWS STATUES AND COMMANDMENT SO YES I AM A CHRISTIAN.AND YOU CANT PRACTICE THE TRUE FORM IN OUR CAPTIVITY YOU CLOWN.YOU ARE DUMB FOR REAL
bloodoutesau1 1 year ago
@blackisraelite9 listen because you lack understanding and show your self to be an idiot you make me have to over post.because you are as dumb as a door nail i told you the law paul was speaking about i guess you cant read too huh?.thats the problem with you scoffers you only see what you want to see.YES I HAVE TO OVER POST BECAUSE I CANNOT HAVE A CONVERSATION WITH AN UNLEARNED PERSON I HAVE TO TEACH A UNLEARNED PERSON.SO IT MAKES NO SENSE SO FORGET IT ALL.THE LORD ISNT DEALING WITH YOU
bloodoutesau1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@blackisraelite9 mathew10:5These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: 6But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. 7And as ye go, preach, saying, The kingdom of heaven is at hand.
i hope you are grasping the concept im going expand on the reasoning behind gentile some more if you want me to expand more let me know ill even get more scriptures
bloodoutesau1 1 year ago
@blackisraelite9 to expand upon that you can only be an Israelite by fathers blood line so the dispersed israelites are the one being called Greeks,not edomites look up the word "Hellenist" tell me what they say.now look at James 1:1James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting...scattered israelites correct
mathew15:24But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
bloodoutesau1 1 year ago
@blackisraelite9 romans10:12For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.
now when you see this you have to understand history and the law.By Jewish law is an Israelite was uncircumcised etc and didn't follow the mosaic law he was cut off from his people look upon as a "GENTILE" so because of the different captivities you had Israelites living by gentile customs in the lands they dwelt.
bloodoutesau1 1 year ago
@blackisraelite9 romans10:4 ask you self what did Christ fulfill the sacrificial law and brought the nation of Israel back to the father correct.the law he is talking about here is the law of bring an animal to to be given for sin.that is the law that was nailed to the cross not the laws of don't commit adultery,don't eat pork etc.the sacrificial law was ended that's why they called Jesus the lamb of God the ultimate sacrifice to bring us back.why you think the temple veil split at his death?
bloodoutesau1 1 year ago
@blackisraelite9 YES I HAVE TO USE ALL CAPS BECAUSE IT GETS THE POINT ACROSS FOR YOU TO PAY ATTENTION AND FOCUS,but since you asked i will not use them. ok brother please forgive me for saying this but if the bible wasn't being read like a fairy tale book you wouldn't even have to ask me that question.i'm not even disappointed in you as the female who did this video that is where the real disgrace is.she suppose to know the scripture to know better but that shows her teacher failed her
bloodoutesau1 1 year ago
@blackisraelite9 LISTEN THE MOST HIGH ISN'T DEALING WITH YOU SO YOU WONT GET IT SO LET IT GO..SOME OF YOU ISRAELITES ARE SO FAR GONE YOU HAVE TO BE PUT TO DEATH AND BE REGENERATED.ONLY UNLEARNED STUPID PEOPLE HALF STEPPING CHRISTIANIZE ISRAELITES RUN WITH ALL THIS BULLSHIT BECAUSE THE LORD NEVER IMPARTED UNDERSTANDING TO YOU,BECAUSE HE DOESN'T WANT EVERYONE TO GET IT THAT'S WHY YOU GUYS A RUNNING WITH THE BULLSHIT BECAUSE THE MOST HIGH HAS LET AN UNCLEAN SPIRIT DWELL IN YOU GUYS
bloodoutesau1 1 year ago
THIS PROVES SHE HAS NO UNDERSTANDING 2PETER3:15-16And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you; 16As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.
SPIRITUAL MIND SPIRITUAL THINGS-CARNAL MIND CARNAL THINGS
bloodoutesau1 1 year ago
@bloodoutesau1 Peter didnt write 2Peter!!
mysty0 1 year ago
@mysty0 PETER WAS WRITING ABOUT PAUL IN THIS LETTER READ THE CONTEXT
bloodoutesau1 1 year ago
BUT LETS CUT TO THE REAL ISSUE BECAUSE PAUL SAID A WOMAN SHOULD NOT TEACH,REMAIN SILENT IN THE CHURCH BE SUBJECTED TO HER HUSBAND,SHE WANTS TO DO OTHER WISE SO TO JUSTIFY THIS YOU HAVE TO GET RID OF PAUL FOR THOSE SCRIPTURES NOT TO MATTER.IF PAUL IS FALSE YOU CANT USE ROMAN.CORINTHIAN,EPHESIANS MOST OF THE NEW TESTAMENT WOULD BE FALSE ALSO IT WAS WRITTEN BY A FALSE PROPHET FULL OF DECEIT.THIS WOMAN IS EVIL AND PRIDEFUL,AND YES A WOMAN'S SALVATION COMES THROUGH HER HUSBAND,THIS IS TRUTH
bloodoutesau1 1 year ago
LISTEN PAUL WAS SENT TO THE SCATTERED ISRAELITES THE GENTILES SO THEY WEREN'T A CUSTOM TO CERTAIN LAWS THAT'S WHY IT LOOKS CONTRADICTORY.BUT LETS CUT TO THE REAL ISSUE BECAUSE PAUL SAID A WOMAN SHOULD NOT TEACH,REMAIN SILENT IN THE CHURCH BE SUBJECTED TO HER HUSBAND,SHE WANTS TO DO OTHER WISE SO TO JUSTIFY THIS YOU HAVE TO GET RID OF PAUL FOR THOSE SCRIPTURES NOT TO MATTER.IF PAUL IS FALSE YOU CANT USE ROMAN.CORINTHIAN,EPHESIANS ETC.THIS WOMAN IS EVIL AND PRIDEFUL
bloodoutesau1 1 year ago
Self-righteousness, pre-judgement. VERY dangerous things.
screwaccounts 1 year ago
HEBREWS 9;16,17
FOR WHERE A TESTAMENT IS,THERE MUST ALSO OF * NECESSITY* BE THE *DEATH* OF THE TESTATOR
FOR A TESTAMENT IS OF FORCE *AFTER MEN ARE DEAD* OTHERWISE IT IS OF NO STRENGTH AT ALL *WHILE THE TESTATOR LIVETH*
Jesus used Paul to tell us what He wanted us to know! He didnt say it walking this Earth cause HE HADNT DIED YET!!!
I noticed the difference too but instead of saying the Bible is CORRUPTED! I PRAYED for understanding!!!
hshambaugh 1 year ago
The law is holy, it teaches love to man and God. We all want to be better but do forget, and only reminded by the fall. In trying to get better- we get worse, once down- hope for Mercy, then try again just to complete the circle once again. If we are to get better as we live, why the loop? The "gift" of fruit is the knowledge of good and evil, but that knowledge stated - you are naked and there is shame! but God loved them naked as He made them, was He wrong?
skbakanov 1 year ago
didn't Jesus healed on the sabbath? he did, so he 'broke' the law? let's face it the 'old testament' is full of the most pathetic, idiotic laws with so called men of god behaving like monsters and women being treated like slaves with no rights. Jesus is the only one that I like he's nothing like all the other fools.
serappia 1 year ago
Jesus stressed the urgency to return to the Father to fulfill His promise to us. That promise was Jesus was going to ask the Father to send His Holy Spirit in My Name.
His gift is the reward for our Faith and serves as our key to the Gates of Heaven and Kingdom of God. If one has Faith, they recieve the gift Jesus promised. I do not think Jesus lied and I can not imagine having Faith without works since Faith is rewarded by the gift which Jesus promised. Jesus doesn't lie.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
"lest any man should boast" no one wants to boast about their works. But faith alone does NOT Save!!!!
Fireinthedawn 1 year ago
@Fireinthedawn
This is interesting in light of (Mathew) Jesus discussion with "have you not known Me, Philip"
Do you think it is possible to have Faith and not have done works? I tend to feel if one truly has faith, works are inherently part of that faith. Otherwise, ones faith is fairly shallow? I can envision one doing works without faith, which is why if had to choose one or the other Faith be the wiser since it would inherently include works. I really can imagine Faith without?
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious
...*can't imagine Faith without works?
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
In Paul's defense I don't think any of Paul's teachings; should have been included in the bible. He wasn't one of the 12 and he never met Jesus. He was no different than the average preacher today. Peter was the rock on which Jesus said he would build his church; not Paul. Its obvious in most of Paul's teachings that he is simply stating his opinion; however it disgust me to see pastors preaching these opinions as factual scriptures. Maybe Paul was secretly working for the Romans(double agent)
thementalpatient2005 1 year ago
@thementalpatient2005 It's obvious to me now that Paul was somebody's agent, either the Romans who protected him or the Pharisees. Maybe he was an agent of both. But seeing that he was originally from Turkey, where Revelation says Satan has his throne, I'd say he was definitely the Evil One's agent.
xander7ful 1 year ago
Comment removed
thementalpatient2005 1 year ago
Nice try....
NOW WATCH THIS.../watch?v=uufHrSCPAt4&feature=feedu
gentlespirit8 1 year ago
@gentlespirit8 that video you link to is full of lies.
you are deceived into worshipping paul. you blind to the truth.
not everything in the bible is from yahwah.
animefan2k9 1 year ago
Paul is not saying to forget the law, he is saying that the law can not save. Also He says to not boast about your works, he does not say don't do works. Works are a product of faith. Only grace can save, then come the works because you have the desire to do the work of Christ. The Pharisees Followed the law, yet Jesus condemned them. Works are a product of Faith which comes from grace which comes from Gods soverign Choice/ election befroe the foundation of the world. Peace
whinda4702 1 year ago 8
@whinda4702 The Israelites transgressed the Law. Yet YHWH still found a person worthy to follow them. So I don't think it has anything to do with a matter of *only containing Grace without works.
To not keep the Law is to not believe in following the laws of the land. The Old Testament states that repeatedly.
Paul was basically trying to side with the GREEK population who didn't understand the law. But I do agree one cannot judge a person based on the LAW if they aren't keeping it fully.
beholdtheageofold 1 year ago
@whinda4702 What this speaker says is true. Act 15:20 Paul is almost stoned by the Nazarenes (Jesus' Church). It is both faith AND works that are required. The Roman Christians have tried it for 2000 years and the results are in - its a fraud. The Vatican (and Protestantism) have more blood on their hands than the pagan Romans (well, actually they are one and the same). Paulianity and Jesus christianity are different religions.
clarkewi 1 year ago
@clarkewi You couldn't be more wrong. The law was NEVER the means of salvation, Paul is merely restating it, showing how Christ UPGRADED the spiritual life due to His Session. But the anti-Paul people never do understand the OT. That's why they can NEVER COMPREHEND anything in the New One.
Y'all will never grow up spirituaLly. Peter said so, recommending Paul's writings in the last half of his letter. BYE.
brainouty 1 year ago
@brainouty Keeping God's Laws (not ceremonial laws) is required of Christians. Acts 15:21 James states what is required of gentiles in order to come to God. Paul came to Jesus' church the Nazarenes to spread the good news many decades after Jesus' crucifixion. Paul has no authority (and never intended) to over rule the 12 Apostles and "Pillars" - James, Peter and John. "Faith without works is dead letter" - James. Roman "Paulian Xtianity" is apostasy - the Beast of John's Revelation.
clarkewi 1 year ago
@clarkewi You couldn't be more wrong. You don't know the Mosaic Law was a POST-SALVATION MATURATION vehicle, now superceded (main theme of the Book of Hebrews, which Paul did NOT write, the Greek writing style is too elegant for Paul).
I don't have time to teach you to read the Bible. Sorry. If you are this confused, it would take me 100 years to straighten you out. So use 1John1:9 and ask GOD to straighten you out on what the heck is brainout talking about. He'll do it.
brainouty 1 year ago
@brainouty No Jew ever claimed you got saved but by GRACE thru FAITH; no verse in OT ever claims works save. Rather, Isaiah 64:6 & Hebrew 'tainu' of Isa53:6. Mikvah (works) are viewed as rewards ATOP salvation, never its means. If you ask a Jew, 'are you going to heaven', he is to reply 'only God knows'.
By Jesus' day, there was confusion, hence the rich young ruler's question. Notice Christ's response: even if the guy gave up all, that didn't save him; but only 'follow me'. NO WORKS!
brainouty 1 year ago
@brainouty Sorry, I forgot to add the most vital part: Mosaic Law was never intended to save you. It was a POST-SALVATION way to learn Adonai Elohenu. Moses explains all that in Deut 6 & 30; how to have a good post-salvation life, ON EARTH.
Sacrifices depicted how your salvation would be PAID FOR in future. You named your sins, put your hand on the animal, since you ALREADY BELIEVED Gen 15:6. So it was a REMINDER, never a means.
Paul just REMINDS the reader of OT, like all Bible writers do.
brainouty 1 year ago
@brainouty no, he did not give all up, he was greived to give it all up and give it to the poor, giving all he had to the poor is an act.have a good day
mystic81006 1 year ago
@mystic81006 please read the comment again. The point was how to be saved, not his reaction. If it helps, I just posted an hour's audio attached to a video called 1RAP, Refuting Anti-Paulinists. I don't have time now to turn the audio into a video. It's a new playlist which I'll enlarge in November.
May you have a good day tomorrow, too!
brainouty 1 year ago
@brainouty well thank you for the blessing on tomarrow, ill check out the video , thanks
mystic81006 1 year ago
@clarkewi acully paul meet 2 of the apostles, he threatened even them and there was a fight about it. this is the main reason there is a scripture that says works with out faith is dead.they meet, they fought, becouse of the fauls teachings paul was teaching. do more history about the matter.
mystic81006 1 year ago
@mystic81006 That is exactly correct. Paul "added" his own gospel to the gospel of the Nazarenes and to Jesus or at least that is how Paul has been interpreted. Peter said that Paul was easily misinterpreted. Acts 15:20 also lets us know that a compromise WAS reached between "The Pillars" James, Peter and John. What needs to be corrected are the pagan, anti torah teachings of Roman Xtianity which hijacked the Nazarene teachings. This is being clarified however it is painful. Keep the Sabbath.
clarkewi 1 year ago
@whinda4702 see my YT study on the false apostle Paul." PAUL THE FALSE APOSTLE "THE BIG TEST" from God" Also my site lasttrumpet org. Paul is a bad guy. Also see web site JesusWordsOnly com. and book by same time written by an attorney and Bible scholar. This will convince you! Blessings Pastor Douglas Nicholson
douglasnvideo 10 months ago
the moral law---is completely different from the dietary, justice, circumcision etc... laws. Even Jesus said many of these things represent things in Heaven.
I apologize if I seem rude, but this video shows a lack of understanding to the entire letters of Paul. Paul didn't teach against repentance or works, as he was often dealing with Jews who were trying to bring entire converts under the entire law---the only law that applies to all men of all time is the moral law. Romans 8:12-13, 13:8-10
droptozro 1 year ago
is Matthew 5:28 the wrong scripture i keep looking it up and it's not whats in the video.If so there needs to be a correction in the description box.
ave383 1 year ago
I read a book by a Jewish scholar who doubts that Paul was actually a Pharisee as he claimed. He said Paul's writing style & style of argument can be compared to Pharisee texts, and it looks more as if Paul is doing a rather poor imitation of a Pharisee. The book is called "The Mythmaker" (Paul and the Invention of Christianity) by Hyam Maccoby if you're interested.
:- )
GlorifiedTruth 1 year ago
I knew there was a reason I subbed!
SecularResponse 1 year ago
1Timothy 1:8 - But we know that the law [is] good, if a man use it lawfully; (1:9 ) - Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, (1:10) - For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine;
blkro123 1 year ago
1Timothy 2:11 - Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. 1Timothy 2:12 - But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. 1Timothy 2:13 - For Adam was first formed, then Eve. 1Timothy 2:14 - And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression. 1Timothy 2:15 - Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety.
blkro123 1 year ago
2Peter 3:15 - And account [that] the longsuffering of our Lord [is] salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you; 2Peter 3:16 - As also in all [his] epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as [they do] also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.
blkro123 1 year ago
paul/saul was is the anti-christ!
gentry1919 1 year ago
DUMB
LCed 1 year ago
Hey man, Paul did not preach against the commandment of Yah. read Rom 3:31, 2:13, 7:12. and in Col 2:14 he was not preaching against the law, he was talking about the ordinances tied to the "BOOK OF THE LAW" the sacrifices. the blood. Harmonizes perfectly dan 9:27. Christ caused the sacrifice and oblation to cease cause he was the perfect sacrifice. Paul kept the Law(Sabbath and Holy days) God knew he had a pride issue thus the purpose of the thorn. May want to reconsider you false apostle claim
pgill61 1 year ago
The video makes some good points, but if Paul's epistles are not the word of God, then what are they doing in the New Testament? How are we to know whether the Gospels themselves are a credible record of Jesus' words? The authenticity of all the New Testament would have to be questioned, since its canon was established by the early Church. How will you decide?
psandbergnz 1 year ago
Good video can't say I disagree with much except the end. The most high does not deal with religion. All man made religions are false and satanic. We are supposed to follow the commandments (all 613 of them) and believe in the Messiah and read the Bible. The Bible is a book that deals with the history of the hebrews (which happen to be black americans not the white khazars in israel), laws, statues and commandments but not religion.
endofsuffering83 1 year ago
@endofsuffering83 no disrespect, but I wonder if you even understand the definition of religion. Religion is the belief in and worship of a god or gods, or any such system of belief and worship, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs. Therefore by its very definition you're practicing a religion whether you accept it or not.
VolkHeart2009 1 year ago
@endofsuffering83 also the very word religion is used throughout the bible for example Acts 26:5, Galatians 1:13, 1 Maccabees 2:22. Also Judaism itself is used throughout the bible. When Galatians 1:13-14 speaks of "the Jews religion," the Greek text reads "iudaismo" (i.e. Judaism!). The same is the case with 2 Maccabees 2:21, 8:1 & 14:38. The King James Bible also renders the word "Judaism" in 2 Maccabees 2:21 & 14:38.
VolkHeart2009 1 year ago
@VolkHeart2009 I think you misunderstood what I meant which is very simple. We were given a book and commandments to follow. Anything besides that leads to confusion and is used to confuse and to keep you away from salvation. I couldn't have kept it simpler.
endofsuffering83 1 year ago
One last thing paul teaches we are saved by grace and not by works yes thats true Paul teaches that we should not use our freedom to come closer to god NOT TO INDULGE in sin. he is saying we shud repent from are wickedness not that we have to. If we ahve to repen from partying drinking chasing women well bascially repent for being human well I am sorry Salvation is not a gift and the word of god is defiantly a lie
virtuallad06 1 year ago
@virtuallad06 Hey man, Paul did not preach against the commandment of Yah. read Rom 3:31, 2:13, 7:12. and in Col 2:14 he was not preaching against the law, he was talking about the ordinances tied to the "BOOK OF THE LAW" the sacrifices. the blood. Harmonizes perfectly dan 9:27. Christ caused the sacrifice and oblation to cease cause he was the perfect sacrifice. Paul kept the Law(Sabbath and Holy days) God knew he had a pride issue thus the purpose of the thorn.
pgill61 1 year ago
@pgill61
May God richly bless you my beloved for STATING what many are deliberately DENYING! Paul NEVER preached against God's commandments! Roman 3:31, 7:7 & MANY OTHER SCRIPTURES testify to that!
Peter said in 2 Peter 3:16 that Paul's letters contain some things that are hard to understand & that THE IGNORANT & UNSTABLE DISTORT THEM AS THEY DO OTHER SCRIPTURES TO THEIR OWN DESTRUCTION!
Paul has NOTHING TO DO with antinomianism. He is a Jew among Jews used by God for holy purposes!
PreparetomeetthyGod 1 year ago
@PreparetomeetthyGod
2nd peter wasn't written by peter.
animefan2k9 1 year ago
@animefan2k9
What do you know about who wrote what? Were you there to witness it? It says Peter & that's what we understand it to be.
PreparetomeetthyGod 1 year ago
@PreparetomeetthyGod
it doesn't match the style of writings of 1st peter.
watch my videos. it covers more then i can write here. watch?v=Tc5GdfvsjUE
animefan2k9 1 year ago
Well the Gspel of john is also The same teachings as Paul Believe in jesus chrsit and thou shalt be saved thats the gospel Jon believes in and I beleive in accroding to Matthew Jesus practically says John is my most knowledgabe and faithful disciple. U h8 paul teachings cuz if people learn Pauls teachings u lose control over them. U call urself mornign sun I beleive in isaih 14 Lucifer is refrered to SON OF THE MORNING star??? the reason why I left chrsitiantity is becasue of all this bs
virtuallad06 1 year ago
If Paul is a false apostle when then james and john are also cuz james writes to the jews about trying to follow the law and how if u offend in one way u offend in all and if ya folow the holy scripture of love thy neighbour as thy self ye do well. So is james a false prophet??/ Tell me this u paul haters jews especailly (I am NOT a jew h8er and i am NOT talking about all Jews) believe that the gospel ACCORDING to John and Matthew are the 2 true gospels I am sorry it's one or the other tbc
virtuallad06 1 year ago
I am not a christian but a former christian and I can tell ya now the reason why people don't like Paul cuz Paul teachings are lets a defuser of there fear tactics. paul teaches that we have to believe in chrsit and what he did for us on the cross to be saved so therefore people no longer arewalk in fear. But mans lust for control over man takes over these h8ers and therefore they h8 paul. u prob find these very same people who say u must follow moses law which is impossible to keep to be cont
virtuallad06 1 year ago
I have just started watching these videos and I did not know that people even looked at paul as false. Now I do not believe he was a false Apostle, some of the stuff he says I do not fully understand but when he says justified by works he is talking about all the laws Moses spoke of and not the original 10 commandments. You must remember paul was an Israelite and the law of Moses was probably still in effect. No man can keep the entire law of Moses, but every man can keep the 10 commandments.
comeup0902 1 year ago
When people start referring to God as 'Yahweh' and Jesus as 'Yehshua' or 'Yahushuwah', they've already stopped being Christian.
RichKnight2010 1 year ago
@RichKnight2010, that's because christinity is a false relegion, just like the rest of them. For God is not a relegion, but spirit, and thos who know Him must worship Him in spirit and in truth, shalom.
dvining40us 1 year ago
@RichKnight2010 Hey i have an earlier post, but to comment on what you said, I am a Christian and I call God by his name Yah. Read psalms 68:4. The word hallelujah means praise ye Yah. Im sure you say it every time you gather together with other believers. Now folk got it twisted cause you can't find no bible that will condemn christianity or the term christian. 1pet 4:16. I also know that in aramaic Jesus name was yehowshuwah but i also understand laws of transliteration and translation.
pgill61 1 year ago
(continued) But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the Lord, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying Know the Lord: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the Lord.' Jeremiah 31:31-34
A0n79fRtW 1 year ago
'Behold the days come, saith the Lord, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt, which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the Lord: (continued)
A0n79fRtW 1 year ago
The Bible states in 2 Corinthians 5:17: "Therefore if any man is in Christ, he is a new creature; the old things are passed away; behold, new things have come."
When we repent of our sins and our saved by grace we are going to want by nature to do good works pleasing unto the Lord.
A0n79fRtW 1 year ago
Paul is so very misunderstood! we have to consider who he was preaching to. remember what peter said about paul's writings. Paul upheld the law! Just remember he was a pharisee who saw us destroy the law with no faith!
This is a good topic. We should discuss more. i thought negatively of Paul as well.
thecovenantkeeper 1 year ago
what is wrong with you ???
nedianaip 1 year ago
in john 5:28-29 not Matt
jlennon555 1 year ago
Good evening my beloved's, I to have been hash on paul, so let me give my most humble apologies, and if the Lord choose him, who am i to say different. Let God be true and everyman a liar! So please forgive my ignorance. for i too am learning about my Savior and His Gospel of salvation. So let's us agree to disagree in peace and love. For as paul has so humbley stated, i die daily, and everyday i live in the flesh i live it to Christ who also gave himself for me, shalom.
dvining40us 1 year ago
I'm printing out all these comments and sending them back in time to Jesus .I'm also sending an ink pen and notebooks .Ive told him he has to write down what actualy happens to avoid all the endless fighting. Jesusjust smiled and said what he really needs is an electric rasor .Said it was just people putting him on a cult like pedastal .
flyingscience 1 year ago
just shows what a book of lies can do to people lol
virtuallad06 1 year ago
ok mr smarty pants. If your so perfect in Jehovah's law - and have completed it - why are you on a computer? Why have you defiled yourself with an idol?
Your talking about salvation from - judging by your own presented outward standards and logic - a perspective of one who has not been saved and who does not know salvation.
HYPOCRITE.
AwaitingSecondComing 1 year ago
Comment removed
jingvt 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A hypocrite is one who does NOTt have the Torah of Yahweh in his heart 'coz the Torah is very truth that the Spirit of truth approves.
Once you love the Torah of Yahweh into your heart, and have the commandments in the Torah in your mouth, you shall bear the fruits of righteous.
On the other hand, if you dont live by the comandments of Yah, it proves that you dont receive the Word of Yahwh in your heart.,,,then you are not only fruitless, but also bear bad fruits.
jingvt 1 year ago
@jingvt, Amen my beloved Amen, shalom. By the way, happy sabbath shalom my friend.
dvining40us 1 year ago
@dvining40us Thanks! Sabbath shalom to you too.
jingvt 1 year ago