Dark matter and gravity are the same thing!, It's an equal and opposite reaction from spherical positron in-wave's.
Two objects radiating quantized wave fronts of electromagnetic radiation. When light spheres super impose around the objects the polarization of crests and throughs become in phase as their spacetimes synchronize. Wave fronts in between cancel each other out as the inward absorption causes objects to resonate together towards the same moment of time (now) "the moment of emission."
What I want to know is, how the hell do these gravitrons fly all the way to Andromeda galaxy (2.5 million light years away) and then back again?
I would say that gravity is more like an equal and opposite reaction to spherical in-wave's that form the out-wave's of our wave-center's. Like water receding from the shoreline into the bass of the wave-particle's. The greater the mass or energy/density forming+/-breaking at the crest (contracting spacetime) the greater the electron out-wave reaction!
A magnet is a double charged gravity bar!, (If opposites did attract, then the poles would be at the center and not at the ends.)
Its an equal and opposite reaction to spherical positron in-waves. Just like water receding from the shoreline into the bass of wave-particle forming+/-breaking at the crest (electron out-wave reaction.)
Hugh Everett's paralell universes are individual wave-centers! Overlapping thus contributing less and less to each others in-wave amplitude with increasing distance.
The graviton particles in this video represent the only graviton particles deemed edible by general relativists interested in blowing stuff up and collider grants.
Putting all the nonsense that physicists have come up with over the past 50 years, into a pretty shape, does not constitute a theory of everything. A theory of everything, must explain the universe in terms of the one type of thing out of which it is composed. Only Squish Theory does this.
Try getting one of those cheap lasers that has five different diffraction plates. One of the plates should do a nice E8 lattice rotation when the plate is rotated. Seems quarks can be pressed into a similar space lattice, with lots of excitable facet-resonances to flash out.
There has never been any particles. . . .Heisenberg called an end to particle accelerators in 1978," when he realized they must be these standing wave's."
@KorrazonCold Indeed,but you also have to understand what that means for "earth","evolution",and the "universe".There is no time,only infinite density,infinite energy.
@Aspanaut There is no empty space, thats why you can see them, more stars surrounding us within our finite observable region of the universe than all the sand, on all the beaches of our tiny world. Christiaan Huygens found that waves from many separate wave sources combine from a distance to form a single wave front, becoming larger and longer wave lengths, Huygens' sharing of waves it contributes less and less to our in-wave amplitude, and thus our mass, with increasing distance.
@Aspanaut It is the inward absorption and outward emission of EMR or light that forms antimatter matter annihilation forming positive and negative electric charge and electromagnetic fields. We see and feel this process as the forward passage of time. Standing-waves (Antimatter positron in-wave) just like water receding from the shore line into the bass of the wave-particle forming the crest (electron out-wave reaction.)
Therefore, there are no forces, only variations of wave pressure
that always just were, erupting cosmic dust in their hour glass for infinity. Big bang, big crunch, big bang out the other side then back for big crunch...
Sometimes there is leakage from universes to universe and or even exchanging of half their hour glasses changing the way the new hour glass functions or both fracture and contents are scattered in random absorption forming an entire new hour glass of different size and balance of matter and anti matter. Just thinking out loud no real training
Could it be our universe is like a hour glass with the center erupting particles/waves simultaneously in two directions like a magnet both positive and negative at once. And as we reach the magnetic boundary of the the big expansion we change polarity and are drawn back for the big crunch to be spit out the other side of the hour glass to do it all over again for infinity. and there are infinite amounts of universes ...
>> Moreover, even though Hawking appears to hate spirituality and mysticism, he somehow finds it right to limit the "scientific vision" by referring to the Pope's commandment not to ask what happened before 'time' was 'born'. Whether Pope or Hawking, or anyone in their bandwagon, it is, to my humble mind, wrong to assume that time itself has beginning or is going to end some day. To my layman's mind, time does not begin or end, nor space is limited.
The TOE is just a catchy title for aa book designed by the publishers of the bk. by that name describing some thoughts expressed by Stephen Hawking of UK. May have been motivated by mopping up maximum sales for the book. Hawking confines himself only to the material universe that is visible to the naked eye, telescopes or microscope, or some scientific measuring instruments. As such he excludes thoughs, feelings, &c, which are the thing in essence, thus TOE is only about the irrelevant.
Ohhh ! ... *NOW* I get it ! ... All I needed to do, all this time, was to ROTATE the model. Come to think of it, there are quite a few models that I would very much like to rotate. Victorias Secret models ... Sports Illustrate Models ... The list goes on and on.
@ClockNumerology I don't mean to offend you in anyway, but what does this have to do with unification of fundamental forces? Please don't take this the wrong way.
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption. Even non-religious people know this.
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
@TheShubLub I think i know what the "universe" is,where it is,and how & why it exists yes.i myself was laughing out loud for about an hour when i first realized how simple it all is. And believe it or not i do have a clinical diagnosis of AS.
Hmm, i think it assumes too much, like a particle carrying gravity, but on a fundemental basis if the assumptions are correct this model seems rather pheasable.
I'm only an electronic engineer,but i have thought long and hard about this in my spare time for the last 15 years.I can see a really elegant solution in my head that really works and explains the forces,but can not transfer it to paper.This is pretty close strangley and spookily.My mathematics is good for engineering but where do i turn for some real mathmatical help?
@WinterLights7 There are limits to how elegant theories can be, for instance, they can't get more simplified than the phenomenas which they are describing, without losing explanatory power.
If we compare Newton's theory of gravity with Einstein's relativity theories, I'd say Newton's theory is more simple and elegant. But in terms of gravity, Einstein's theories have more explanatory power.
There might be an simpler explanation to gravity, but it must explain all about G that relativity does.
maybe we should not be in a hurry to judge his findings until unification really fits-the first 8,000 TOEs that say they found the theory of everything will be bogus, even if millions of PHDs back them...the truth will be far more exciting than the search for it
Okay now explain what these small things are made of.......Okay then Don't call it something that it is not. It should not be called the theory of everything. anything but that.
@DhrTressie said "Yeah, this is the sort of nonsense that turned me off a career in Physics, and directed me towards Engineering."
Sounds like you may have been an engineer to start with. I believe that we really fall short of helping bright students in high school and the first half of undergrad find their true calling. I think It is partly the fault of the wonderful videos available today that make almost anything seem fascinating. btw - I studied Math when it should have been Physics.
If you believe in GOD you should love science. Regardless of what anyone says, science is usually bringing us closer TO GOD through understanding. Furthermore, these types of theories allude to intelligent design - it's far too perfect/harmonious to be any other way. We live in an inherently emergent world - nothing exists without the will for it's creation.. Intent. "the mother of invention is necessity."
Completely clueless, as expected from an ID advocate. Depending on if you're an honest person who's been deluded or a typical lying ID advocate out to delude himself, I wonder if it's adorable or annoying.
But let me say this... Have you ever examined a crystal's structure? Or a snowflake? Very harmonious huh? Now study how they form. (Hint: No god required or involved.)
Not that I think you'll learn much, most humans ignore facts if they don't like them, or twist them.
This is a mechanic, coherence, deterministic, totalitarian, elegant and simple theory of everything.
This book will take you through the physical world describing it from the Grand Mechanical point of view, and showing the simplest, most elegant understanding for all the physical phenomenons we know. The book is also making predictions for phenomenons not yet discovered.
this is my plan ,.. this IS my way ,.. IT IS the path you took today ,.. a hidden truth for all to see ,.. you create your reality ,.. close your eyes and reboot,.. a quantum computer in your mind ,.. all set to a specific time ,.. the on button i will press when 11 11 11 brings it's crest.
Its a nice graphic reperesentation, the sad part is that to truly understand it , it is required many years of study of phisics (ok i guess) and some years of abstract algebra (shivers)
@Rosalila .Is not this what women do everyday , think their thoughs in a E-8 model shape so men dont know if their own asses are in front or on the back
This doesn't explain particle masses, as others have noted. Oldershaw's "Discrete Scale Relativity" seems to be an interesting approach to hacking out particle masses. Also his related explanation for dark matter seems to be right along the lines of my perspective on it.
Anything predicting particles of gravity can't be all bad, IMO.
By the way, because of latest results in analysis of tevatron data, some people are apparently now convinced that the supposed Higgs field can only be accountable for a small percentage of invariant mass.
I would say it's at least on the right track. Fields are BS. Particles are real and any thing that effects something else needs to be physical and have phisical interaction. This modle is to precise and not not populated enough. I'd say drop the buzz words created by other scientists and keep chasing that rainbow.
A diagram movie of the four fundamental forces' interactions in a kaleidoscopic but two-dimensional manner. I don't get it...or are we supposed to watch this vid in 3D to make sense of the squiggly rotations? But even then, this does not exactly unite relativity with quantum mechanics, eh?
Groups of three & the holy trinity neutrino acids & electrons put into motion 1 state of life or the separation of life broken back down as it's turned back around into their elements descending into the deep whence it came having lost ownership over your organism. The only question is will a man be a positive energy or a negative one? Will he be bound by earth or will he be bound by spirit? Let science prove that God exist as many times as it takes for the blind man to see with his heart aweh
Dark matter and gravity are the same thing!, It's an equal and opposite reaction from spherical positron in-wave's.
Two objects radiating quantized wave fronts of electromagnetic radiation. When light spheres super impose around the objects the polarization of crests and throughs become in phase as their spacetimes synchronize. Wave fronts in between cancel each other out as the inward absorption causes objects to resonate together towards the same moment of time (now) "the moment of emission."
MrKorrazonCold 5 days ago
What I want to know is, how the hell do these gravitrons fly all the way to Andromeda galaxy (2.5 million light years away) and then back again?
I would say that gravity is more like an equal and opposite reaction to spherical in-wave's that form the out-wave's of our wave-center's. Like water receding from the shoreline into the bass of the wave-particle's. The greater the mass or energy/density forming+/-breaking at the crest (contracting spacetime) the greater the electron out-wave reaction!
MrKorrazonCold 5 days ago
i used to understand the theory of everything but then i took an arrow to the knee
marcthomasSarjoon 1 week ago
Comment removed
Aspanaut 1 week ago
Comment removed
Aspanaut 1 week ago
A magnet is a double charged gravity bar!, (If opposites did attract, then the poles would be at the center and not at the ends.)
Its an equal and opposite reaction to spherical positron in-waves. Just like water receding from the shoreline into the bass of wave-particle forming+/-breaking at the crest (electron out-wave reaction.)
Hugh Everett's paralell universes are individual wave-centers! Overlapping thus contributing less and less to each others in-wave amplitude with increasing distance.
MrKorrazonCold 2 weeks ago
The graviton particles in this video represent the only graviton particles deemed edible by general relativists interested in blowing stuff up and collider grants.
CACBCCCU 3 weeks ago
Putting all the nonsense that physicists have come up with over the past 50 years, into a pretty shape, does not constitute a theory of everything. A theory of everything, must explain the universe in terms of the one type of thing out of which it is composed. Only Squish Theory does this.
Newtspeare 3 weeks ago
Try getting one of those cheap lasers that has five different diffraction plates. One of the plates should do a nice E8 lattice rotation when the plate is rotated. Seems quarks can be pressed into a similar space lattice, with lots of excitable facet-resonances to flash out.
CACBCCCU 3 weeks ago
If your not alive, are you dead?
dp7shamrock 1 month ago
God is real.
RespectMyHate 1 month ago
There has never been any particles. . . .Heisenberg called an end to particle accelerators in 1978," when he realized they must be these standing wave's."
KorrazonCold 1 month ago
@KorrazonCold Ummm... have you heard of wave–particle duality?
caseygtr 1 month ago
@KorrazonCold Indeed,but you also have to understand what that means for "earth","evolution",and the "universe".There is no time,only infinite density,infinite energy.
Aspanaut 4 weeks ago
@Aspanaut There is no empty space, thats why you can see them, more stars surrounding us within our finite observable region of the universe than all the sand, on all the beaches of our tiny world. Christiaan Huygens found that waves from many separate wave sources combine from a distance to form a single wave front, becoming larger and longer wave lengths, Huygens' sharing of waves it contributes less and less to our in-wave amplitude, and thus our mass, with increasing distance.
MrKorrazonCold 3 weeks ago
@Aspanaut It is the inward absorption and outward emission of EMR or light that forms antimatter matter annihilation forming positive and negative electric charge and electromagnetic fields. We see and feel this process as the forward passage of time. Standing-waves (Antimatter positron in-wave) just like water receding from the shore line into the bass of the wave-particle forming the crest (electron out-wave reaction.)
Therefore, there are no forces, only variations of wave pressure
MrKorrazonCold 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
Aspanaut 1 week ago
what the fack have i just watched
Spurdelspardel 2 months ago 6
And now we will soon do the same with our universe/ocean.
Aspanaut 2 months ago
Comment removed
Aspanaut 2 months ago
These machines came together to become us.
Aspanaut 2 months ago
Comment removed
Aspanaut 2 months ago
Wrong!,. . . No wave's, no theory of everything!, Your wrong! "To understand the secrets of the Universe is to understand the anatomy of the wave."
KorrazonCold 2 months ago
Hm... these guys are kind of convincing:
goo . gl / j05V
Meltir 2 months ago
The theory of everything, brought to you by the Red Queen and Umbrella Corporation. Enjoy your stay here at our facilities in Raccoon City.
TheHillmanater 2 months ago
that always just were, erupting cosmic dust in their hour glass for infinity. Big bang, big crunch, big bang out the other side then back for big crunch...
Sometimes there is leakage from universes to universe and or even exchanging of half their hour glasses changing the way the new hour glass functions or both fracture and contents are scattered in random absorption forming an entire new hour glass of different size and balance of matter and anti matter. Just thinking out loud no real training
roymaitland 2 months ago
Could it be our universe is like a hour glass with the center erupting particles/waves simultaneously in two directions like a magnet both positive and negative at once. And as we reach the magnetic boundary of the the big expansion we change polarity and are drawn back for the big crunch to be spit out the other side of the hour glass to do it all over again for infinity. and there are infinite amounts of universes ...
roymaitland 2 months ago
>> Moreover, even though Hawking appears to hate spirituality and mysticism, he somehow finds it right to limit the "scientific vision" by referring to the Pope's commandment not to ask what happened before 'time' was 'born'. Whether Pope or Hawking, or anyone in their bandwagon, it is, to my humble mind, wrong to assume that time itself has beginning or is going to end some day. To my layman's mind, time does not begin or end, nor space is limited.
MarjorieBakre 3 months ago
@MarjorieBakre Look for time definition. Do you understand anything of it, because I don't.
demarmat 2 months ago
The TOE is just a catchy title for aa book designed by the publishers of the bk. by that name describing some thoughts expressed by Stephen Hawking of UK. May have been motivated by mopping up maximum sales for the book. Hawking confines himself only to the material universe that is visible to the naked eye, telescopes or microscope, or some scientific measuring instruments. As such he excludes thoughs, feelings, &c, which are the thing in essence, thus TOE is only about the irrelevant.
MarjorieBakre 3 months ago
Am I seeing the "flower of life"?
TraxTheAlien 3 months ago
Ohhh ! ... *NOW* I get it ! ... All I needed to do, all this time, was to ROTATE the model. Come to think of it, there are quite a few models that I would very much like to rotate. Victorias Secret models ... Sports Illustrate Models ... The list goes on and on.
phrankus2009 3 months ago
@philopolymath - the hell are are you talking to/about?
TheJabberwock 3 months ago
What is the Theory of Everything? = 358 (english)
-358th Day = 12/24 (dec 24)
-12:24 AM = 00:24
1/24 = 0.041666
-4:16 PM = 16:16
-What is God's Number? = 1616 (Jewish Gematria)
ClockNumerology 3 months ago
@ClockNumerology I don't mean to offend you in anyway, but what does this have to do with unification of fundamental forces? Please don't take this the wrong way.
guiltyspark1337 3 months ago
@guiltyspark1337
Oh, Me :-(
I thought we were talkin 'bout science. Oh! Don't bother me, then. I'm very busy learning the fundamentals of numbers n things.
ClockNumerology 3 months ago
I doubt it's a theory of everything; but very interesting regardless.
IdaMiaDot 3 months ago
Damn you, Quantum Physics, I was hoping to get a career in game development, but you just -have- to go and be so interesting.
TuahShinguru 3 months ago
Why is the little girl from Resident Evil talking about this... ironic I guess.
xguy1965 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
that made no sense at all
circleseverywhere 3 months ago
What the watch did I just fuck?
soranuareane 3 months ago
Such arrogance such ignorance so tragic
philopolymath 3 months ago
Imma let you finish, but String Theory owns this.
ja524309 3 months ago
It's too bad they didn't make this so that it could be understood by the public. The model shows a hell of alot if its right.
MirageScience 3 months ago
Comment removed
Aspanaut 3 months ago
Comment removed
Aspanaut 3 months ago
Comment removed
Aspanaut 3 months ago
Comment removed
Aspanaut 3 months ago
Comment removed
Aspanaut 3 months ago
Comment removed
Aspanaut 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption. Even non-religious people know this.
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
lightandbeautiful 4 months ago
I am a 19 year old community college student with asperger's syndrome.
And after doing a bit LSD,I really think i know what the theory of everything is.
And its much more simple yet far more strange than any of these other theorys.
All i can say here is i believe the universe may be an ocean.
Aspanaut 4 months ago 24
@Aspanaut tell me more
seriously i'm intrigued
natmanprime 3 months ago
@natmanprime
You live on a subatomic particle.
Aspanaut 3 months ago
Or better put,u orbit a subatomic particle.
Aspanaut 3 months ago
You are a nanobot :I
Aspanaut 3 months ago
@Aspanaut ok mate
natmanprime 3 months ago
@Aspanaut it obviously isnt if you think of that sense of liquid, it can have ocean like properties with spacetime, but its a vacuum, not a liquid.
Etrajbe 2 months ago
@Aspanaut I also have asperger's. Now tell me-- how did you get a hold of lsd?
TheAgnostiic 1 month ago
@TheAgnostiic It fell onto my tongue like a snowflake
Aspanaut 4 weeks ago
@Aspanaut This honestly isn't a new idea. And no dope/hallucinogens were needed to postulate such an interpretation.
Mahmood42978 2 weeks ago
@Aspanaut LOL Yes I'm sure the 19 year old with self proclaimed asperger's syndrome has it all figured out!
TheShubLub 1 week ago
@TheShubLub I think i know what the "universe" is,where it is,and how & why it exists yes.i myself was laughing out loud for about an hour when i first realized how simple it all is. And believe it or not i do have a clinical diagnosis of AS.
Aspanaut 1 week ago
@Aspanaut I saw what you are talking about too. It's really strange but unexplainable. So simple but it doesn't make sense to the mind.
4thDimensionGemini 3 days ago
@4thDimensionGemini I could easily explain it.
Aspanaut 2 hours ago
I also think i may know the origin of life and the destiny of the human race,but lets not jump the gun.
The only hint i can give in that respect is that we are all machines.
Aspanaut 4 months ago
@Aspanaut ooh wow ur amazing and mysterious
natmanprime 3 months ago
Comment removed
Aspanaut 4 months ago
Comment removed
Aspanaut 4 months ago
Genius!!! Makes me think
anarchi270 4 months ago
wtf did i just watch? plus i hate women with stupid voices "explaining" such videos
AxCYeR 4 months ago
Hmm, i think it assumes too much, like a particle carrying gravity, but on a fundemental basis if the assumptions are correct this model seems rather pheasable.
mynameismatt2010 5 months ago
I'm only an electronic engineer,but i have thought long and hard about this in my spare time for the last 15 years.I can see a really elegant solution in my head that really works and explains the forces,but can not transfer it to paper.This is pretty close strangley and spookily.My mathematics is good for engineering but where do i turn for some real mathmatical help?
dudewheresmy6string 5 months ago
This isn't new. I saw the same while smoking weeds.
DamonSetras 5 months ago
nonsense
mattysimsoficial 5 months ago
To complicated.Theory should be simple and elegant.
WinterLights7 5 months ago
@WinterLights7 There are limits to how elegant theories can be, for instance, they can't get more simplified than the phenomenas which they are describing, without losing explanatory power.
If we compare Newton's theory of gravity with Einstein's relativity theories, I'd say Newton's theory is more simple and elegant. But in terms of gravity, Einstein's theories have more explanatory power.
There might be an simpler explanation to gravity, but it must explain all about G that relativity does.
FatLingon 4 months ago
No.
Ambulanceo 5 months ago
No.
WowCataclysmGameplay 5 months ago
amillionmonkeys.blog.com aren't you curious?
ShangoRaiden 5 months ago
No.
TheDetour4 5 months ago
Comment removed
TheDetour4 5 months ago
No.
MrFrancisH 5 months ago
No.
L1ama 5 months ago
all very elementary really.
arthurmee 5 months ago
Sacred geometry and metatron = theory of everything?
Sounds like ancient knowledge to me.
TCupUK 5 months ago
ta learn more about e8 and this approach.....
check out garrett lisi at ted.com
sterilecat 5 months ago
make it 3dimensional and ill be impressed. seriously what is this BS.
Ectos0111 6 months ago
@Ectos0111
I don't know anything about it, therefore it is false?
iickle 5 months ago
Does not understanding anything of everything mean I understand nothing?
Protopro91 6 months ago 16
@Protopro91 yep
ilookatshoes 4 months ago
@Protopro91 Yes.
2ndhandsoul 2 months ago
@2ndhandsoul ...But you won't understand that even if we told you.
2ndhandsoul 2 months ago
@Protopro91 yes.....it does
thehoodlum1919 2 months ago
keep in mind they're all theories, no one really knows the answers they're just speculating possibilities.
Notaforumguy007 6 months ago
Well, seeing as the title is "The Theory of Everything", I should've just expected to not understand shit.
MrServThePerv 6 months ago
fractals?
evilchimp69 6 months ago
@evilchimp69 idk probably not, as far as i know, f(x+y)=y+f(x+y)) is err fractals this thing is err more than that i think not sure don't know ...
BUGBUSTERss 6 months ago
maybe we should not be in a hurry to judge his findings until unification really fits-the first 8,000 TOEs that say they found the theory of everything will be bogus, even if millions of PHDs back them...the truth will be far more exciting than the search for it
davoce2 6 months ago
see a poem about TOE and E8 honoring Lisi and his search on Google - use keywords "da Voce MSO735" and then work into site
davoce2 6 months ago
Okay now explain what these small things are made of.......Okay then Don't call it something that it is not. It should not be called the theory of everything. anything but that.
DeadHappyFilm 6 months ago
"Is this the theory of everything?" NOPE; it's just more absolute bull crap!
MsWanderer1 6 months ago
Yeah, this is the sort of nonsense that turned me off a career in Physics, and directed me towards Engineering.
DhrTressie 6 months ago
@DhrTressie said "Yeah, this is the sort of nonsense that turned me off a career in Physics, and directed me towards Engineering."
Sounds like you may have been an engineer to start with. I believe that we really fall short of helping bright students in high school and the first half of undergrad find their true calling. I think It is partly the fault of the wonderful videos available today that make almost anything seem fascinating. btw - I studied Math when it should have been Physics.
javamanV3 6 months ago
looks interesting^^
watch spirit science and you see there is something in common^^
TheNachter 6 months ago
ehhh......no i dont get it..:/
diegoXm94 7 months ago
@diegoXm94
Here's the longer version that's a bit easier to comprehend: watch?v=y-Gk_Ddhr0M
mtszabo 6 months ago
If you believe in GOD you should love science. Regardless of what anyone says, science is usually bringing us closer TO GOD through understanding. Furthermore, these types of theories allude to intelligent design - it's far too perfect/harmonious to be any other way. We live in an inherently emergent world - nothing exists without the will for it's creation.. Intent. "the mother of invention is necessity."
DanielOcean111213 7 months ago
@DanielOcean111213
Completely clueless, as expected from an ID advocate. Depending on if you're an honest person who's been deluded or a typical lying ID advocate out to delude himself, I wonder if it's adorable or annoying.
But let me say this... Have you ever examined a crystal's structure? Or a snowflake? Very harmonious huh? Now study how they form. (Hint: No god required or involved.)
Not that I think you'll learn much, most humans ignore facts if they don't like them, or twist them.
TheSkunkCat 7 months ago
@DanielOcean111213 But let's be clear. The GOD you describe has absolutely nothing to do with any of the abrahamic religions whatsoever.
thinkahol 3 months ago
what about God you simpleton?
richardmtl 7 months ago
What about God!!!??
Jaimeantidiesel 7 months ago
@Jaimeantidiesel Does not exist.
Crazyrat84 7 months ago
So basically it all goes back to the stargate sequence from 2001: A Space Odyssey?
EGarrett01 7 months ago
Hi All,
Checkout: Grand Mechanical on Amazon.
This is a mechanic, coherence, deterministic, totalitarian, elegant and simple theory of everything.
This book will take you through the physical world describing it from the Grand Mechanical point of view, and showing the simplest, most elegant understanding for all the physical phenomenons we know. The book is also making predictions for phenomenons not yet discovered.
MrBenYehooda 7 months ago
this is my plan ,.. this IS my way ,.. IT IS the path you took today ,.. a hidden truth for all to see ,.. you create your reality ,.. close your eyes and reboot,.. a quantum computer in your mind ,.. all set to a specific time ,.. the on button i will press when 11 11 11 brings it's crest.
MrMentalflossed 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Holy shit, the jews are behind it all!
iggypayne 7 months ago
theory of everything: god was and is creating all we see noob!!!!!!!!!!!
murian33 8 months ago
@murian33
Crazy religious person >.< open your mind to facts instead of only believing lies
TehEpicSpork 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@murian33 ha ha ha
arthurmee 5 months ago
Right, now divide that by zero and you have your answer.
Scarfe619 8 months ago 7
@Scarfe619 EXACTLy
ThleTruth 8 months ago
theory of my ass
cooleb 8 months ago
When am high this makes more sense than when i'm just sober ...
Borat911 8 months ago
crop circles
Blackjack3905 8 months ago
this is theory of everything - o
MrStasko 8 months ago
shame this has been totally discounted. oh well, was a good idea, just doesn't work
ksimmonsASU1 8 months ago
Comment removed
CHD1130 8 months ago
uhhh i hate these videos. Don't you understand I'm a dumbass? Can you please take longer than 2:24 to explain this shit?
sk8rbuoi 8 months ago
just looks like they move the shapes around until it looks like something useful.
TimSAksu 8 months ago
the theory of everything is god = logic theoreticalphysics.webs.com
paginipro 8 months ago
Why every science video has a woman with an english accent, is beyond me.
OGZombies 8 months ago
thats the flower of life from the kabbalah...
Ramsez 9 months ago 2
@Ramsez Finally, someone else made the connection.
usherpaulson 7 months ago
@usherpaulson why do you think that is?
Ramsez 7 months ago
Its a nice graphic reperesentation, the sad part is that to truly understand it , it is required many years of study of phisics (ok i guess) and some years of abstract algebra (shivers)
orcodrilo 9 months ago
Is this really science ?
Or is it like 42 ( 6(star) x 7(god) ) the meaning of life.
BenderOfMusic 9 months ago
I sniff gluons.
bearcolombia 9 months ago
Am I the only one seeing a hypercube rotation in there? =S
The "star like pattern" is the same one used in a hypercube... Maybe I'm just weird though XD
jacowboy 9 months ago
You'll understand better the video if you watch it without sound and with the screen switched off
PelisTheBow 9 months ago 41
42 indeed!
RichtoffenRoach 9 months ago
I only have one thing to say to this. 42!!!
djsmallboy 9 months ago 2
Quarks are made from electric charges, see my video.
Newtspeare 9 months ago
what are those fucking quarks made of?
DanielxLira 9 months ago
Comment removed
Newtspeare 9 months ago
@DanielxLira Even smaller particles.
nikolayzou 9 months ago
something has to cause snowflakes to freeze the way they do.. that is for sure...LOL
clnmyjts 9 months ago
This was very confusing... Seemed really interesting but needs better explanation
Trailer1220 9 months ago 8
Voiceover by 'Moaning Myrtle'...?
PluggyPoo 9 months ago
Yeah, knowledge of Newtonian Physics isn't going to help me here!
cryora 9 months ago
I'm not smart enough for this!
Rosalila 9 months ago
@Rosalila .Is not this what women do everyday , think their thoughs in a E-8 model shape so men dont know if their own asses are in front or on the back
exxalte 9 months ago
@exxalte perhaps some, but I get along better with guys than with girls :p .. girls are too backwards for my taste lol.
Rosalila 9 months ago
double triangle star shape that we all know!!! subliminal propaganda
italmia 9 months ago
This is all bullshit! All of knowledge is bullshit!
Josephjoel3 10 months ago 2
@Josephjoel3 You're bullshit.
uriituw 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I understand everything now.
irtehpwnzer777 10 months ago
I think it's missing some dimensions
DerTypHinnerDir 10 months ago
I think it's missing some dimensions
DerTypHinnerDir 10 months ago
@DerTypHinnerDir - I think I'm missing some dimensions...
tmckamey1 8 months ago
And if you're colour blind you're completely buggered and will never understand the model.
428ghost 10 months ago
This doesn't explain particle masses, as others have noted. Oldershaw's "Discrete Scale Relativity" seems to be an interesting approach to hacking out particle masses. Also his related explanation for dark matter seems to be right along the lines of my perspective on it.
CACBCCCU 10 months ago
Don't...understand
RarewareLover 10 months ago
Anything predicting particles of gravity can't be all bad, IMO.
By the way, because of latest results in analysis of tevatron data, some people are apparently now convinced that the supposed Higgs field can only be accountable for a small percentage of invariant mass.
CACBCCCU 10 months ago
I would say it's at least on the right track. Fields are BS. Particles are real and any thing that effects something else needs to be physical and have phisical interaction. This modle is to precise and not not populated enough. I'd say drop the buzz words created by other scientists and keep chasing that rainbow.
Revstoningpot 10 months ago
that pattern is in the flower of life
greywin 10 months ago
so this proves that the universe is really complex?
sports444life 10 months ago
It doesn't explain how the big bang was formed for if you ask me M-theory is a lot more convincing and realistic
knightfightnight 10 months ago
@knightfightnight what about the "theory" of a white-bearded man "banging" everything into existence 6000 years ago ;-)
atheistfromaustria 10 months ago
A diagram movie of the four fundamental forces' interactions in a kaleidoscopic but two-dimensional manner. I don't get it...or are we supposed to watch this vid in 3D to make sense of the squiggly rotations? But even then, this does not exactly unite relativity with quantum mechanics, eh?
TheRonMorales 10 months ago
Groups of three & the holy trinity neutrino acids & electrons put into motion 1 state of life or the separation of life broken back down as it's turned back around into their elements descending into the deep whence it came having lost ownership over your organism. The only question is will a man be a positive energy or a negative one? Will he be bound by earth or will he be bound by spirit? Let science prove that God exist as many times as it takes for the blind man to see with his heart aweh
moetrizzle 10 months ago
FFS Stop the acting of these acsents
MrTimothytim 10 months ago
@.@ tripping balls mann
srtyhtn 10 months ago