G 1.9 +0.3 Nemesis - New 2010 Images from Spain

[ezzmannoob]

brown dwarfs canot be seen with the naked eye u need infared his pic looks remakably like jupitor complete bollox !

[inescapabledoom]

That's not even a real picture of a brown dwarf! LOL it's that fake graphic that was taken from one of those star size comparison charts! Anyways, if it's there, it's not getting closer and closer to us, it's always measured to be about 223 AU away. If the size of whatever it is, is getting bigger, then, it'd have to be moving away from us and expanding at almost the same rate, wouldn't it?

[royalspin]

Not disinfo-I really wish people would look at the "more info" section which clearly says category( entertainment.) For those who are clueless-G1.9+0.3 is a young supernova remnant 25,000 light years away-not a brown dwarf like so many are freaking out on.Its easy to scare the sheeple thats for sure.Cool music by the way.

[coyotegene86]

@royalspin except this remnant got 16% larger from the first to second time it was viewed by astronomers. They have deduced a supernova is not a possible suspect.

[joshanator1]

I would love to get a copy of that song! What's the name of it?

[TrueHamal]

G1.9+0.3 is a supernova remnant. It's not Nibiru nor the Dark Star. This information is fake.That's all.

[irelandopera]

....no disinformation here.... r u implying i work for some MIB govt group or something? lol. Cool, that would be nice. I'd be driving a yellow Lambraghini by now

[AJAnewage]

@irelandopera u mean misinformation moron

[MrSputnicone]

disinformation

[RidingTheWaves101]

@MrSputnicone not

[hijackednation]

that brown dwarf represents a methane rich BD star (green)

[nebkeperoure]

supernova G1.9 0.3. Chandra de la NASA X-ray Observatory image obtenue au début de 2007

[nebkeperoure]

Pas très sérieux tout cela c'est une supernova qu'un de nos membres a identifié

[TrueHamal]

Why "they" did not locate the Sun on the Dorado or on the Draco Constellations, just on the axis that goes across the Sun from North to South, from the Northern Ecliptic Pole, a point on these coordinates [18h 00m 00.0000s , 66° 33'38.558''], to the South Ecliptic Pole, the other symmetrical point with these other coordinates [06h 00m00.0000s , -66° 33' 38.558''] ? Why ignore this capital fact in the figure 5?

'Cause "they" don't know,after all, where the Sun's located in the Space.

[TrueHamal]

Or they lie trying to pull our legs, either they are very wrong. Completely wrong. I don't know. The Sun might not be located on the far end of stars between the Pictor and the Columba constellations, like here it is, fig 5, so, this location is no right at all for the Sun. The Sun must be located, by perspective, just on the South Ecliptic Pole on the Dorado Constellation at these coordinate values: [06h 00m 00.0000s , -66° 33' 38.558'']

G1.9 is not Nemesis nor it isn't Nibiru. Not at all.

[macktheknife888]

SO, NASA is saying you need infered classes to see a white flash that a supernova makes? What a load of BOLLOCKS. If a supernova happened in our own solar system 140 years ago the chances of us being here now are slim. Logic alone will tell you, the blast wave from a supernova in our own solar system would blast us to kingdom come. SO, what is it? The russians say Nibiru, or Planet X? I would say they are on to something here when the russian scientists are saying it's coming towards US :(

[ThreeFangCat]

@macktheknife888 SNR 1.9+0.3 is located 26000 light years away in the center of our galaxy. It's visible light is blocked for the same reason stars in the same area cannot be seen in the night sky--thick layers of dust between the remnant and us. This distance also accounts for why we were not destroyed--it is not in our solar system.

Here is what it is: watch?v=aynK0iJDo9w

Here is a counterpoint to the Starviewer claims: watch?v=lvISu5oT8sA (note real scientific papers on G1.9 from uploader)

[fiesta1117cc]

@ThreeFangCat How can that be? you say this object is 26000 light years away & they say this object is 223.09 AU The Voyager 1 space probe launched in 1977 has now reach a distance of 108.60 AU which puts its just below the half way line P.S an AU is the distance measured between Sun & Earth its much better than using km other wise its too many numbers for the scientist to cope with The same will also apply to AU at greater distances then the scientist will start to using light years

[ThreeFangCat]

@fiesta1117cc I don't understand your question. Are you asking how is it that I'm quoting such a different distance than the Starviewer Team? I supplied video information about SNR G1.9+0.3, both in terms of what is is and a rebuttal to the Starviewer claims. If I don't understand what you are getting at, just let me know.

[fiesta1117cc]

@ThreeFangCat No it doesn’t make sense to me at all this video shows details that G1.9+03 is a distancia when translate to English means distance of 223.09 AU & others are saying its 260.000 light years away it can not be both its either one or the other If those claims by the Spanish scientist are correct that its 223.09 AU then in astronomical terms its reasonably close to our solar system i.e. Voyager 1 space probe is 108.60 AU

[ThreeFangCat]

@fiesta1117cc The commonly accepted distance of SNR G1.9+0.3 is about 26000 light years. This puts it close to the center of the Milky Way. The value you see in this video is completely contrived: The Starviewer Team are not astronomers, they are a UFOlogy club. This is the second time they have released information about G1.9, and they changed the distance claim. Neither time was any methodology for how they get the distance mentioned.

[ThreeFangCat]

@fiesta1117cc To counterpoint, real science has done quite a bit of work with SNR G1.9+0.3, as it is a very interesting object. Many papers have been published, estimating distance and how they arrive at said distance. For actual peer reviewed publications, look at the uploader's notes on this video:

watch?v=lvISu5oT8sA

I hope that lays to rest questions about the Starviewer claims. To be succinct:

Starviewer Claims Are Bunk

[fiesta1117cc]

@ThreeFangCat Ok thanks I understand it now its another one of those conspiracy theories lurking around the internet one claim made against another this time its star viewers team. They always say one scientist always disagrees with another

[ThreeFangCat]

@fiesta1117cc No worries. It is a common tactic of the pseudoscientist to attempt to depict science as unsure on an issue. They then insert their unproven hypothesis and state it as fact without supporting evidence.

[fiesta1117cc]

@ThreeFangCat Why do those people like starviewer team make false claims like that? What are they to gain out of it? If it was true that Planet X is heading our way from that given distance of 223.09 AU it would take somewhere between 50/70 years to reach us i.e. its taken Voyager 1 33 years to reach a distance of 108.60 AU

[ThreeFangCat]

@fiesta1117cc I heard one website surmise they were trying to generate traffic on their website. I don't know how true that is.

[fiesta1117cc]

@ThreeFangCat Who’s generating traffic on who’s website? Mind you, there are many websites suffering from generated traffic problems in some cases if one has a grudge against or is wanting to make a profit out of a particular website they just keep spamming it until the website pays a fee to stop them continuing its like a form of blackmail where profit is to be made out of it

[ThreeFangCat]

In their first statement on the subject, Starviewer claimed the distance was 60-66 AU. Now the claim is 221-223 AU. Why the change?

[ThreeFangCat]

Am I missing something, like the part that says these are conjectural images in Celestia? Or is everyone just assuming this?

[MATRIXREVOLUTIONS2]

GOOD WORK!!! 5 STARS

[sinongmakulet]

From 1984- 2009, The distance is 223+ AU? Way too far.

By comparison, Pluto is 40 AU from the sun.

[ostormbringero]

good vid!!

[distander]

IF it was Nemesis or Nibiru it would change its distance from Sun, but it is 223 AU in 1984, 224 in 20004, 223 in 2005, 221 in 2007, 223 in 2008, 223 in 2009.

NIbiru is supposed to be getting closer and closer to our Sun, as it should have eliptic excentric orbit, but object in your video has had stable distance in last 26 years. Something is wrong.

[OLDTIMER1969]

it's Jupiter ........dah

[distander]

@OLDTIMER1969 Jupiters distance is 5,2 AU, this object is 221-224 AU from Sun as comment in this video says

[OLDTIMER1969]

@distander Well Gee! the object has bands identical to Jupiter,( before it lost one of it's rings a few months back. ) unless Jupiter has an exact twin floating around some where that is Jupiter,

[distander]

@OLDTIMER1969 Sure it looks like Jupiter, no doubt, but what about the distance value? Fake?

[ekpa]

if this is truly nemesis, and this is a solid proof of it then i guess i can relax because it doesn't get any closer... in all the dates that this video presents, the object stays within ~221-223 AU and it doesn't seem to be getting any closer throughout the years. So if the Spanish astronomers are correct and this is Nemesis indeed, then we are safe...

[3WMElliott]

No scientific paper in the world would write "We could say that surprised us, but it would not be true because the truth is that we expected."

This document appears to be cobbled together with whatever 'evidence' they want to use, regardless of what the sources actually say. Heck, it even mentions - in passing - the Sumerian accounts of Nibiru, which have been shown to be nothing but mistranslations.

If they ever manage to get this peer reviewed, credit to them. Until then, it's nonsense.

[comanchehotspot]

Hey, It's not that they can't figure it out. It's the fact that they don't want to recant their claim of it being a supernova. If they give the right numbers, then they have to say it's a brown dwarf. They know it's a brown dwarf. jerks! oh, and great video by the way.