From an artistic point of view,what's so great about Picasso? I don't understand why there are so many people who love his works - they're a little too abstract for me.I like works that are a little more reallistic such as Renoi.
@1xtokyoeye2 if i were president of tghe usa i would make halloween a day when all modern art paintings are confescated from galaries and painters and i would pile them all up and make a guy folks bon fire.....and i dont fucking care if the masses think i am an unsophisticated souless person who does not understand modern art fraud and cons...piccaso is plain garbage and he knows it too...
@1xtokyoeye2 every night piccaso went to bed he would huddle with a blanket and laugh his ass off and thank god for the amazing luck and good fortune that there are so many idiots out there willing to pay him millions for total bullshit art.....oh yeah and he lived a great womaniser boozer debaughery type of life....way to fucking go with these total fruads and con men....cubist period blue periods my ass....oh the bullshit talk they come out with is fascinating....
nice , ..... but whoever pay these million dollars to put on wall of their homes , with expensive wine at hand just for showing friends to have rank in society as they understand from art are retarted .... doesnt know meaning of life... even picasso himself wouldnt love that ..
nice , but whoever pay these million dollars to put on wall with wine at hand showing friend are retarted .... doesnt know meaning of life... even picasso himself wouldnt love that ..
@istanbultravellers its all a big fucking fraud perpetrated by the art community and the art auction mafias.....i would never trust my kids to be with an atr teacher who paints like picasso....never klnow what goes on in his sick head....its a total con from a to z....the next big con after that is modern sculpture....what a fucking joke
In 1480 Leonardo da Vinci produced the world's first, and only, literal visual musical equivalent. This is what enabled art to acquire the title of "Art." This visual music contains a mathematical syntax. Experiencing of this syntax requires a developed cognitive capability. A prerequisite to this is a person's ability to cognize "space." We can actually "see" this ability degenerating from 1480 to 1880, with the introduction of Picasso, and the elimination of "intelligence" in and of "Art."
I totally agree with you ghaile123. I have always said that art is not to be understood by the eyes & mind...but to be felt by the soul & emotions. Picasso is the best abstract artist to have ever lived & painted, & one of my fav's. I think he's everyone's favorite because he was a genius & unrivaled. No one, to this day, or probably ever, can really ever compete or unseat him as exactly that.
these pictures are all SHIT and whoever paying millions to those retarted figures are mentally sick ....In figures who is fcking who cant understad and ass of a guy coming from the eye..even my sisters daughter draw these 3 years old ...when you act like you understand from this shit you are treated as you are something in society but fck brain whoever buy these and put on wall at home..this what i say honestly..but music is fine .....
Modern art is not for everyone, as the music is abstract, not everyone could close the eyes and feel, not everyone can look at a painting and feel the emotions that an artist can communicate, color, shape, depth, lines, all in perfect harmony or disharmony. Wrote by Manuel Gongora Cuban Painter.
the pictures he paints aren't really about what he physically saw, but towards communicating the feeling and atmosphere in detail of what he has witnessed through his paintings. an artist feels somenthing, creates somenthing about it which his feelings are put into, then others unconnected interface with the creation, then feel what he felt origonally. which is true artistry.
Was Picasso an artist or magician? Some really stunning images there that were conceived in his twenties. Back then, you were still required to draw properly before doing your own thing, the liberals have removed all that now. Bit like being allowed to design a bridge and being crap at maths and science.
Thank you very much for this. The combination of two of the greatest geniuses who ever lived was a magnificent idea, even though maybe some other music could be more suited to the picassian spirit (Bela Bartok, perhaps). But you get your point across very well: sonorous and visual genius exploding together. Thanks again.
Someone who doesn't like Picasso doesn't like painting, just as someone who doesn't like Mozart doesn't like music. Both are genius who express the pure delightement of creation. They make the world a better place to be.
Sad that cubism, pop art,dadaism type crap-art existed and speculators and fraudsters made tons of money out of it.Basically they killed the talent and accumulation of knowledge of centuries. Classic painting was seen as a taboo especially in the 20th century and the fraud still goes on as we speak by (con)artists like Tracey Emin who has sold her dirty urine soaked bed as (con)artpiece for 100s of thousands of dollars.
You have a XIX° century's banker sensitivity. I'm sure you also think that Joyce is not a good wirter because he didn't make classical novel and that Stravinksy is not a good musicial because the Firebird is no a classical symphony. You have missed the revolution of modernity, it's sad.
Wether you like modern art or not. It's inevitable that people get bored and seek NEW things from time to time. I hate Punk Rock but it had to happen.
I do like Pop Art, If bet if you'd have been living in the 60's Pop Art would have seemed as fresh as the Beatles.
Wether you like modern art or not. It's inevitable that people get bored and seek NEW things from time to time. I hate Punk Rock but it had to happen. I do like Pop Art, If you'd have been living in the 60's Pop Art would have seemed as fresh as the Beatles.
Picasso was a mediocre painter, lucky enough to exist during a time, when art became a stock market speculation rather than beauty and harmony. He misused it and was highly successful at it, similar to other con-artists like Andy Warhol, Miro, Kandinsky, Pollock etc.I firmly believe that the history will absolve this fraud once and for all and reinstate the rightful artists like Gerome, Bourgeareau, B.Constant, Waterhouse etc.!
and like me, just dont know how communist he was. I dont know much bout his life, but if he was a real communist Franco would have comn after him bad.
ive seen a veteran on the streets begging for food paint the most moving thing ive ever seen and renowned artists paint the biggest load of crap ive ever seen. but in my opinion picasso was good but never realised hi abilities. maybe he spent to much time fooling around with modigliani and then realised he would never truely get it no matter how skilled he was.
Art has value if you look at it and like it. That simple. Just bc you don't like or understand an artist's style doesn't mean it isn't any good. If I want realism, I'll look outside or take a picture.
JAJAJAJAJAJAJA JAJAJAJAJAJAJA JAJAJA JAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJA let me tell you somthing in spanish, you people who say Picasso is nott a true artist: --------------- SILENCIO Y A APRENDER
It's true, classical realism, like the works of William Bouguereau were dismissed and did drop in value considerably, during the rein of Pablo Picasso! If Picasso really did go to the trouble to discredit classical realists, it shows he had very little real talent, and knew it. If so, he was just in it for the fame and the cash. Sounds like a lot of actors and actresses in Hollywood. These types of people are parasites on society. They bring nothing to value to mankind and take so much.
Picasso did not try to go out and target a specific genre to discredit it. He just simply did what he wanted to do. This is one reason why he is so important.
What he did is introduce and somewhat popularize (unintentionally) a type of painting where artistic integrity is recognized through the thought and act of the creation of a piece.
And for the record, someone who is revered in the "art world" as much as Picasso is, he is in all reality just as good as they say.
I heard that Picasso would "whip out" paintings when he was low on money, and he got a kick out of watching people make such a fuss over his "quickies".
He was something of a "con artist" (no pun intended) and got away with it -- to the tune of millions...
SmerkNomGool, I have heard that about Picasso, and I've wondered about it for years. Obviously, it would be fairly easy to fake a Picasso -- at least in appearance. Of course, not in the mainsteam art world.
But faking a Bouguereau? Not very likely. You'd have to be extremely talented just to paint like WA Bouguereau. Some artists are, but they are few and far between.
"Artists", if you care to call them that, who are modernists, like Picasso, as a dime a dozen.
If you want Realism, buy a camera. That's why artists like Bougereau were left behind. Modern artists realized you had to deliver more than just a "picture" of reality.
Exactly. Representation was delegated to an artistic method that could reproduce an image accurately. The artist then concentrated on things that are difficultly portrayed and impossible to describe through most other mediums.
I agree. Looking at Picasso's "artwork" (if you can call it that), I'd have to say he was hardly qualified to pass judgement on the works of a truly gifted painter like William A. Bouguereau. Pablo was a quack and a pretender. Sex, fame and money were his real obsessions, not art. His "artwork" was just a means to that end. In truth, his artwork is "much ado about nothing" as William Shakespeare once said about some things in this world.
Picasso was very jealous of certain 19th century painters like WA Bouguereau, whose style Picasso was unable to master, try as he did early in his career. He just didn't have the 'gift', some of his teachers said. Picasso refused to accept this and vowed he'd be a rich and famous artist. As his reputation grew, he used his influence to discredit the classic realists. Why? Money. Because of Picasso, fine painters like Bouguereau were largely ignored by the mainstream art world for decades.
I don't understand how people can think Picasso and other talented contemporary artists are "crap" simply because they choose to not paint realism. Every good contemporary artist can draw realistically and every bad contemporary artist (which give the good a bad name) cannot draw realistically.
In order to break the rules one has to know them quite well first.
@stephanielynnkeil picasso raped the innocece of the early 20th century. he was indeed the minotaur. a charlatan in my humbel opinion. there must be a new psychological concept discribing this mass dillusion of his greatness
This can be in the form of association: they associate the image with something positive,
or in the form of contrast with what one is used to e.g. modern and post modernism contrasts with realism. Artwork has its place in the art world because it contrasts with the usual.
Your statement: those who cannot paint realistically give modern artists a bad name, is one of your associations; it does not make art good or bad
@stephanielynnkeil I understand what you are saying, but in the case of Picasso i really do think he wasted his great talent for realism to get some attention and commercial success.
I dont look at Picasso as a crappy artist even tho i think most of his work was crap, when he had made a name for himself as an artist it was like he stopped caring for the quality of his work, i have even seen documents of him making fun of how bad some of his work is from an execution point of view.
Firstly-sorry for calling you a fucking idiot.I find his shitter paintings more interesting,in the sense that the process of arriving at a masterpiece is just as important as the masterpiece.His more experimental 'preparation works' need to be viewed in the context that they are a stepping stone and not a final peice.I am impressed by Picasso's work as a collective and an ideal.Any old schmo can make a true masterpiece but does that make them a true artist?
wow your stupid, he doesn't draw like that because only CAN draw like that, picasso can draw realistically and very well but this is his style of art. I mean we see realistic things all the time so why not see something different?
No, u r stupid. U dont understand what I m talkimg about. Of course he could draw realistically and there are realistic paintings in this video. But a painting that no one understand what shows is a crap. If I draw such crap u ll tell me "its a crap", is picasso draws it u ll say "its a masterpiece". This is a crazy way of thinking.
the reason why is because he knows how to draw realistcally but chooses to draw this way. He is already famous so yeah. if you were famous and drew another weird way some people might like it. If you paint that people won't think it's crap anyways, they'll probably actually like it.
So we agree that if u r famous and u make a crap, people will see it as masterpiece... This is comedy and explains why only a few people interest in this "art".
I imagine you have never painted or tried to paint, normally people who can't do, criticise, give it a go first, and once you really have, you might actually have an opinion which means some thing.
That is true, stating the truth with the information you have is still the truth, but sometimes, when you add additional information, your perception might change.
Queremos ya un día Internacional de la pintura!!! La pintura y los pintores se merecen (nos merecemos) este reconocimiento por antigüedad ancestral y por bien social!
You think the music fits? Sorry, but unless you mean it fits by mere virtue enormous artistic merit I couldn't disagree more. Mozart seems to me about as thematically incongruent to the work Picasso as I could imagine and, as I said in an earlier comment, Stravinsky might have been a much better (if too obvious) match.
For anyone who does not know, the first picture in this video was "painted" (one is never sure which verb to use with a pastel) when Picasso was fourteen years old. The painting at 6:31 is one I've not seen before, and I was fairly certain i'd seen them all. It obviously dates from around 1923, but can anyone tell me who the sitter is?
Yes, I know who Gertrude stein is; it really doesn't to like her to me.
And the commonplace observation the she discovered Picasso seems to me somewhat debatable.
To me it looks quite a bit more like Picasso's mother and if I'm right that the picture dates from the early twenties (as, if you'll forgive my immodesty, I almost surely am) the sitter appears to be the right age.
Then again, wasn't Picasso's mother dead by then?(I forget what year she died; his father went first, I think in 1915).
You're referring, I presume, to the patch of yellow situated to the bottom left of the alter boys foot?
It's very preceptive of you to notice this, but I doubt this passage is intended to represent a face, let alone the Mona Lisa, and I'm sure any appearance to the contrary is incidental.
There is however a distorted image of a skull to be seen in one of Holbein's paintings, and a hidden face in one of Durer's watercolor landscapes, as well as (of course) in many of Dali's pictures.
bonsoir,c'est une vidéo qui ns conne une idée sur le gd maire.mais j'ai une faveure à vs demander;biensur si vs artiste aussi; c'est de maccompagner pour me confirmer dans le domaine de la peinture ;j'aime peindre et je veux que mon niveau soit bien,ou bien renseignez moi qq'un qui puisse m'aider.merci
Picasso didint only do "Cubisme" he was also a very good figurative painter, but he chose this path because he loved it. and their is nothing wrong with that.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Picasso is a BIG hoax, no composition, no idea, bad use of colors...he was a manufacturated fake geniuos... for what?...for the service of Mr money. Want a real artist??...Dalí. Andy Warhol, another cheat. "Modern Art" acepts any kind of shit...for MOney... Just ask yourself: Does this paint make me feel something??. Picasso is a BIG hoax.
40 years damn, dude.art has no rules therefore everything could be a mistake and it becomes art.picasso was gifted he started doing academic drawings at the age of seven,whats up with famous artists with the same letter initials anyone noticed????
The funniest thing about Picasso's paintings..and probably ALL paintings for all I know ( I just realized this right now )
is that even when once you got the GIST of what the painting is trying to CAPTURE..there's still the REALITY of what it's trying to capture BEHIND that......endless endless endless!
Everyone should be free in the eternity of art and orgasmic thoughts and feelings, Love the world. I breath. The Battle of Guernica, accompanied by the tension of violins....Pablo; Love the name; Picasso; even more,
The statement attributed to Picasso by rosenor8780
"I do not have the effrontery to call myself an artist at all, not in the grand old...etc I am only a clown, a mountebank. I have understood my time and have exploited the imbecility, the vanity, the greed of my contemporaries."
is a well-known fake. It is from a book "Il Libro Nero" by Giovanni Papini (1951) in which Papini invents a fictitious interview with Picasso. Papini invented all sorts of these imaginary interviews.
Picasso is one of the most important figures of his time. His early figurative work demonstrates great skill as a draftsman. The cubist work shows us a huge intellect at work and his later, free work takes us from our conscious world to another - frequently more exciting and often more disturbing. A master the equal of anf of the great Renaissance painters.
Are you actually comparing yourself to him? I have no idea that you "paintings" look like, but I know from your comment that you are pretentious and could never be a real artist. Try doing something original and not imitating someone who was actually creative. ...the county fair? that's almost laughable.
"I do not have the effrontery to call myself an artist at all, not in the grand old meaning of the word. Giotto, Titian, Rembrandt, Goya were great painters. I am only a clown, a mountebank. I have understood my time and have exploited the imbecility, the vanity, the greed of my contemporaries." (Pablo Picasso, 1951)
Mozart´s 25th symphony best
mirkopetrincic 2 weeks ago
From an artistic point of view,what's so great about Picasso? I don't understand why there are so many people who love his works - they're a little too abstract for me.I like works that are a little more reallistic such as Renoi.
1xtokyoeye2 1 month ago
@1xtokyoeye2 if i were president of tghe usa i would make halloween a day when all modern art paintings are confescated from galaries and painters and i would pile them all up and make a guy folks bon fire.....and i dont fucking care if the masses think i am an unsophisticated souless person who does not understand modern art fraud and cons...piccaso is plain garbage and he knows it too...
afaf233 6 days ago
@1xtokyoeye2 every night piccaso went to bed he would huddle with a blanket and laugh his ass off and thank god for the amazing luck and good fortune that there are so many idiots out there willing to pay him millions for total bullshit art.....oh yeah and he lived a great womaniser boozer debaughery type of life....way to fucking go with these total fruads and con men....cubist period blue periods my ass....oh the bullshit talk they come out with is fascinating....
afaf233 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
E' arrivata l' Arte Pre-Odierna.
Per trovare il blog, basta cercare " Pre-Odierno" su Google
supertranquillo 2 months ago
nice , ..... but whoever pay these million dollars to put on wall of their homes , with expensive wine at hand just for showing friends to have rank in society as they understand from art are retarted .... doesnt know meaning of life... even picasso himself wouldnt love that ..
istanbultravellers 2 months ago
nice , but whoever pay these million dollars to put on wall with wine at hand showing friend are retarted .... doesnt know meaning of life... even picasso himself wouldnt love that ..
istanbultravellers 2 months ago
@istanbultravellers its all a big fucking fraud perpetrated by the art community and the art auction mafias.....i would never trust my kids to be with an atr teacher who paints like picasso....never klnow what goes on in his sick head....its a total con from a to z....the next big con after that is modern sculpture....what a fucking joke
afaf233 6 days ago
picasso was great in his cubist period, but then he started experimenting for its own sake and that's when his art started falling
TheEdgarvarese12 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the best artist for ever
ebrevinil
vinilosdecorativos1 3 months ago
check this video out:
Picasso pablo art slideshow artist quotes famous paintings
artdisciple 4 months ago
how about a torch which puts darkness on object instead of light !!!! is that art ?
imranbug81 5 months ago
gracias))
artvugar.com
vugarmuradov 5 months ago
visit
quenri23 5 months ago
very good art
quenri23 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
diamantinopereira.blogspot.com/
quenri23 5 months ago
In 1480 Leonardo da Vinci produced the world's first, and only, literal visual musical equivalent. This is what enabled art to acquire the title of "Art." This visual music contains a mathematical syntax. Experiencing of this syntax requires a developed cognitive capability. A prerequisite to this is a person's ability to cognize "space." We can actually "see" this ability degenerating from 1480 to 1880, with the introduction of Picasso, and the elimination of "intelligence" in and of "Art."
MrMikeludo 7 months ago
"L' oiseau chante avec ses doigts". Jean Cocteau.
000000000789 7 months ago
I painted 2:15!!!
dude162534 8 months ago
does anyone know the name of the painting at 6:11 ? I really like it
91rosiero 8 months ago
Hi world I'm selling my painting for $1,500,000 Please check it out. Thank you for you time. Enjoy. Eli cohen painting
water48 8 months ago
Hello I am ernesto picasso and the truth that the drawings of picasso are better that eh dres
nestor10ist 9 months ago
I totally agree with you ghaile123. I have always said that art is not to be understood by the eyes & mind...but to be felt by the soul & emotions. Picasso is the best abstract artist to have ever lived & painted, & one of my fav's. I think he's everyone's favorite because he was a genius & unrivaled. No one, to this day, or probably ever, can really ever compete or unseat him as exactly that.
vickiehill1 9 months ago
PICASSO SUCKS DICK.
DoucheBagFagNigger 9 months ago
will always be my favourite artist
bladybrunch 9 months ago
Simply amazing!
Greetings from Iran
disndat11 9 months ago
picasso is overrated
bojacub 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
absinthefilm. c o m
ktconlon 9 months ago
the worst painter ever.just for loughs
dimonsnight1 10 months ago
realistic art is mostly dull and uninteresting. good, creative art makes ur head explode when ur high which is why cubism is pretty frickin awesome
orientrat 10 months ago
Wonderful. Thanks.
Livingbell 10 months ago
bad quality
MrZorroFB 10 months ago
Who is thee Composer ?? ? ? ? Please i Beg you !
BLACKSTARS69 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
these pictures are all SHIT and whoever paying millions to those retarted figures are mentally sick ....In figures who is fcking who cant understad and ass of a guy coming from the eye..even my sisters daughter draw these 3 years old ...when you act like you understand from this shit you are treated as you are something in society but fck brain whoever buy these and put on wall at home..this what i say honestly..but music is fine .....
gloriousottomanempir 11 months ago
Comment removed
istanbultravellers 11 months ago
happy new year! could you tell me the name of the painting in 5:16 please? thank you
makapeis 1 year ago
im nopt sure but i think that dali was better!
pasciente 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Visit my Channel. French Artist. Visit my Channel.
LoulouisaRa 1 year ago
Modern art is not for everyone, as the music is abstract, not everyone could close the eyes and feel, not everyone can look at a painting and feel the emotions that an artist can communicate, color, shape, depth, lines, all in perfect harmony or disharmony. Wrote by Manuel Gongora Cuban Painter.
Abstractsurrealism1 1 year ago
bravo pour cette vidéo qui laisse une large part à ses peintures figuratives où passent à la fois vie et émotion
29morel1 1 year ago
Picasso ao som do Concerto Nr 25 de Mozart, é demais, maravilhoso!
ZemArte 1 year ago
NIce video.
Thisisnotmyrealname8 1 year ago
the pictures he paints aren't really about what he physically saw, but towards communicating the feeling and atmosphere in detail of what he has witnessed through his paintings. an artist feels somenthing, creates somenthing about it which his feelings are put into, then others unconnected interface with the creation, then feel what he felt origonally. which is true artistry.
redpillow100 1 year ago
Was Picasso an artist or magician? Some really stunning images there that were conceived in his twenties. Back then, you were still required to draw properly before doing your own thing, the liberals have removed all that now. Bit like being allowed to design a bridge and being crap at maths and science.
mirial2108 1 year ago
just incredible---
bbuteo 1 year ago
Genius...just genius. I wish I could have known him.
ThePhantomBlacksmith 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
'I can paint his "best" paintings within half an hour'
You are not PIcasso.Simple and stupid in the same time.
Co0Br4 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You call that piece of art? Well, I call it piece of shit. >:-(
isnogood00 1 year ago
'I can paint his "best" paintings within half an hour'
Um, no. You can't.
JamesDunn1987 1 year ago
Thanks for posting this.
tmmmviii 2 years ago
Thank you very much for this. The combination of two of the greatest geniuses who ever lived was a magnificent idea, even though maybe some other music could be more suited to the picassian spirit (Bela Bartok, perhaps). But you get your point across very well: sonorous and visual genius exploding together. Thanks again.
wizardofthecrow 2 years ago
Very nice!
MartaBtrp 2 years ago
love the one at 2:16
laszabo 2 years ago
Comment removed
hahahacool70 2 years ago
Someone who doesn't like Picasso doesn't like painting, just as someone who doesn't like Mozart doesn't like music. Both are genius who express the pure delightement of creation. They make the world a better place to be.
lapinot21 2 years ago 2
What if you don't like Mozart but still like 3 days grace.
Wait a sec, you still don't like music then.
TheSZimmer 2 years ago
Picasso a mediocre painter ,haha dude u have a mediocre brain ,
bobobimp 2 years ago
Sad that cubism, pop art,dadaism type crap-art existed and speculators and fraudsters made tons of money out of it.Basically they killed the talent and accumulation of knowledge of centuries. Classic painting was seen as a taboo especially in the 20th century and the fraud still goes on as we speak by (con)artists like Tracey Emin who has sold her dirty urine soaked bed as (con)artpiece for 100s of thousands of dollars.
vaporizer08 2 years ago
You have a XIX° century's banker sensitivity. I'm sure you also think that Joyce is not a good wirter because he didn't make classical novel and that Stravinksy is not a good musicial because the Firebird is no a classical symphony. You have missed the revolution of modernity, it's sad.
lapinot21 2 years ago
Wether you like modern art or not. It's inevitable that people get bored and seek NEW things from time to time. I hate Punk Rock but it had to happen.
I do like Pop Art, If bet if you'd have been living in the 60's Pop Art would have seemed as fresh as the Beatles.
JohnPurchaseArt 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Wether you like modern art or not. It's inevitable that people get bored and seek NEW things from time to time. I hate Punk Rock but it had to happen. I do like Pop Art, If you'd have been living in the 60's Pop Art would have seemed as fresh as the Beatles.
JohnPurchaseArt 2 years ago
Picasso was a mediocre painter, lucky enough to exist during a time, when art became a stock market speculation rather than beauty and harmony. He misused it and was highly successful at it, similar to other con-artists like Andy Warhol, Miro, Kandinsky, Pollock etc.I firmly believe that the history will absolve this fraud once and for all and reinstate the rightful artists like Gerome, Bourgeareau, B.Constant, Waterhouse etc.!
vaporizer08 2 years ago
@vaporizer08
People like you are the reason Duchamp wanted to destroy art.
kingboobs20 11 months ago
communist and born in 81 like me
portugal81 2 years ago
and like me, just dont know how communist he was. I dont know much bout his life, but if he was a real communist Franco would have comn after him bad.
verrybrainie 2 years ago
his attitudes were comunists and his paintings gernica etc but he care more about art that he care about politics the art was his refugee and world
portugal81 2 years ago
your subscription is sooooocool
SSonicfan 2 years ago
Buen trabajo mis felicitaciones. JUAN
A Good Job!!! JUAN
JuanDeGata 2 years ago
Fantastico!!!!!!
1Aquareladecolores 2 years ago
ive seen a veteran on the streets begging for food paint the most moving thing ive ever seen and renowned artists paint the biggest load of crap ive ever seen. but in my opinion picasso was good but never realised hi abilities. maybe he spent to much time fooling around with modigliani and then realised he would never truely get it no matter how skilled he was.
roninmic101 2 years ago
Picasso is really a big artist, since when he was a boy (look "old fisherman" made at the age of 13 years old!!!!!)
Picasso: uno de los mas grandes artistas de el XX sieglo. Pintò el "viejo pescador" en la etad de 13 anos!!!!! irene klein
irenekklein 2 years ago
Art has value if you look at it and like it. That simple. Just bc you don't like or understand an artist's style doesn't mean it isn't any good. If I want realism, I'll look outside or take a picture.
wa11z 2 years ago
JAJAJAJAJAJAJA JAJAJAJAJAJAJA JAJAJA JAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJA let me tell you somthing in spanish, you people who say Picasso is nott a true artist: --------------- SILENCIO Y A APRENDER
SpiritCanaryisland 2 years ago 2
It's true, classical realism, like the works of William Bouguereau were dismissed and did drop in value considerably, during the rein of Pablo Picasso! If Picasso really did go to the trouble to discredit classical realists, it shows he had very little real talent, and knew it. If so, he was just in it for the fame and the cash. Sounds like a lot of actors and actresses in Hollywood. These types of people are parasites on society. They bring nothing to value to mankind and take so much.
OldBenFranklin 2 years ago
Picasso did not try to go out and target a specific genre to discredit it. He just simply did what he wanted to do. This is one reason why he is so important.
What he did is introduce and somewhat popularize (unintentionally) a type of painting where artistic integrity is recognized through the thought and act of the creation of a piece.
And for the record, someone who is revered in the "art world" as much as Picasso is, he is in all reality just as good as they say.
numbard 2 years ago
I heard that Picasso would "whip out" paintings when he was low on money, and he got a kick out of watching people make such a fuss over his "quickies".
He was something of a "con artist" (no pun intended) and got away with it -- to the tune of millions...
OldBenFranklin 2 years ago
my dad told me a similar story. :)
rouncer81 2 years ago
You can't be a con artist with art. If someone finds value and beauty in it then it has value.
dwixi 2 years ago 2
SmerkNomGool, I have heard that about Picasso, and I've wondered about it for years. Obviously, it would be fairly easy to fake a Picasso -- at least in appearance. Of course, not in the mainsteam art world.
But faking a Bouguereau? Not very likely. You'd have to be extremely talented just to paint like WA Bouguereau. Some artists are, but they are few and far between.
"Artists", if you care to call them that, who are modernists, like Picasso, as a dime a dozen.
DrStimulus 2 years ago
If you want Realism, buy a camera. That's why artists like Bougereau were left behind. Modern artists realized you had to deliver more than just a "picture" of reality.
WeMeU2 2 years ago 2
Exactly. Representation was delegated to an artistic method that could reproduce an image accurately. The artist then concentrated on things that are difficultly portrayed and impossible to describe through most other mediums.
numbard 2 years ago
I agree. Looking at Picasso's "artwork" (if you can call it that), I'd have to say he was hardly qualified to pass judgement on the works of a truly gifted painter like William A. Bouguereau. Pablo was a quack and a pretender. Sex, fame and money were his real obsessions, not art. His "artwork" was just a means to that end. In truth, his artwork is "much ado about nothing" as William Shakespeare once said about some things in this world.
YingYangDongBong 2 years ago
Please do not comment if you have nothing of value to say.
numbard 2 years ago
really you need to know his work, at age 12 he was drawing & painting better than many of my Fine Arts teachers.
Learn before speak, He was graduated with honors at age 16 in Fine Arts.
juanjomay 2 years ago
Picasso was very jealous of certain 19th century painters like WA Bouguereau, whose style Picasso was unable to master, try as he did early in his career. He just didn't have the 'gift', some of his teachers said. Picasso refused to accept this and vowed he'd be a rich and famous artist. As his reputation grew, he used his influence to discredit the classic realists. Why? Money. Because of Picasso, fine painters like Bouguereau were largely ignored by the mainstream art world for decades.
SmerkNomGool 2 years ago
i love Picasso i alrady read the book 1:16 the peinting has a big storry in it ... my mom's storry
aniwais the paintings are cool i love art
jc90nemo 2 years ago
My humble suggestions:
increase the length of the clip to 10 minutes. So we will have some more seconds to enjoy each picture;
add name and date of paintings on the black sides of the screen.
Congratulations for the selection of works, choice of background music and for the good sense of not adding any visual effects to masterpieces.
Thanks for the clip.
merquior 2 years ago 14
@merquior "So we will have some more seconds to enjoy each picture;"
Hi, Pausing can do the trick too
iglooo101 1 year ago
Comment removed
merquior 2 years ago
picasso is always an eternal.love him
marrrien 2 years ago
picasso genius go to maxkingworld on youtube
maxkingworld 2 years ago
He has a UNIQUE imagination O.O
asg00001 2 years ago
I don't understand how people can think Picasso and other talented contemporary artists are "crap" simply because they choose to not paint realism. Every good contemporary artist can draw realistically and every bad contemporary artist (which give the good a bad name) cannot draw realistically.
In order to break the rules one has to know them quite well first.
stephanielynnkeil 2 years ago 22
its called abstract defection for art you interoperate it differently then what the artist meant.
SimRose1 1 year ago
@stephanielynnkeil WEll said.
BlakeBarbieDoll 1 year ago
@stephanielynnkeil picasso raped the innocece of the early 20th century. he was indeed the minotaur. a charlatan in my humbel opinion. there must be a new psychological concept discribing this mass dillusion of his greatness
TheSololobo 1 year ago
@stephanielynnkeil art is about stimulating the onlooker's senses.
This can be in the form of association: they associate the image with something positive,
or in the form of contrast with what one is used to e.g. modern and post modernism contrasts with realism. Artwork has its place in the art world because it contrasts with the usual.
Your statement: those who cannot paint realistically give modern artists a bad name, is one of your associations; it does not make art good or bad
ggg33312 8 months ago
@stephanielynnkeil I understand what you are saying, but in the case of Picasso i really do think he wasted his great talent for realism to get some attention and commercial success.
I dont look at Picasso as a crappy artist even tho i think most of his work was crap, when he had made a name for himself as an artist it was like he stopped caring for the quality of his work, i have even seen documents of him making fun of how bad some of his work is from an execution point of view.
ChrisTube3333 7 months ago
@stephanielynnkeil ---I agree, somebody agree with me
23jessicasilva 3 months ago
Reading comments on this video makes me realise how much ignorant some people are
improja 2 years ago 3
It is Mozart's Symphony # 25 in G Minor, 1st movement, and was used in Amadeus.
x1paul 2 years ago
I'm not sure of the name of the piece, but it is Mozart. It was used in the film Amadeus.
x1paul 2 years ago
Amazing video =)
Can someone please tell me the name and the composer of the song used in it? thanks a lot
allendharmonica 2 years ago
the mother of picasso was half italian.
laugartez 2 years ago
...grazie x questo fantastico video...
jfabioazul 2 years ago
so f***ing crap... I can draw same picture like you... Why is that so special??? Becaose you draw that... I don't thik so...
dankotomanic 2 years ago
but he can paint/draw waaay better in realism than you, most likely anyways.
he just chose this way.
hyperion311 2 years ago
who ever wants to see an amazing artist type eric mcCully
bobiesworld13 2 years ago
placed into my playlist of Picasso, thanks !
meesterschilders 2 years ago
most of these paintings looks like crap...
PP1969GR 2 years ago
you are a fucking idiot pp1969gr
smegma42 2 years ago 3
No, I just say the truth and what most of prople believe. U cannot call "masterpiece" a paintiing that u cant even understand what shows u.
If I the creator of a crap is me or u then we will call it crap, if the creator is picasso or some1 like him, then we ll call it masterpiece...
PP1969GR 2 years ago
Firstly-sorry for calling you a fucking idiot.I find his shitter paintings more interesting,in the sense that the process of arriving at a masterpiece is just as important as the masterpiece.His more experimental 'preparation works' need to be viewed in the context that they are a stepping stone and not a final peice.I am impressed by Picasso's work as a collective and an ideal.Any old schmo can make a true masterpiece but does that make them a true artist?
smegma42 2 years ago
wow your stupid, he doesn't draw like that because only CAN draw like that, picasso can draw realistically and very well but this is his style of art. I mean we see realistic things all the time so why not see something different?
WGStephen 2 years ago 3
No, u r stupid. U dont understand what I m talkimg about. Of course he could draw realistically and there are realistic paintings in this video. But a painting that no one understand what shows is a crap. If I draw such crap u ll tell me "its a crap", is picasso draws it u ll say "its a masterpiece". This is a crazy way of thinking.
PP1969GR 2 years ago
well guess what, you can't draw this....
the reason why is because he knows how to draw realistcally but chooses to draw this way. He is already famous so yeah. if you were famous and drew another weird way some people might like it. If you paint that people won't think it's crap anyways, they'll probably actually like it.
WGStephen 2 years ago
So we agree that if u r famous and u make a crap, people will see it as masterpiece... This is comedy and explains why only a few people interest in this "art".
PP1969GR 2 years ago
I imagine you have never painted or tried to paint, normally people who can't do, criticise, give it a go first, and once you really have, you might actually have an opinion which means some thing.
TONYCIM 2 years ago
U dont have to paint in order to say the truth. My opinion is all people's opinion.
PP1969GR 2 years ago
That is true, stating the truth with the information you have is still the truth, but sometimes, when you add additional information, your perception might change.
TONYCIM 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i totally agree!! i can pain wayy better than that
bahanchodrandi 2 years ago
Thank you, Gracias, Merci. Great compilation
October57 2 years ago
ya its true, contempory music would haved been better
improja 2 years ago
this is a stupid question but under what genre of music would this song fall into, symphony? i really like this song.
Volv093t 2 years ago
piękne dzieła!!!
kizimizikotek 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Queremos ya un día Internacional de la pintura!!! La pintura y los pintores se merecen (nos merecemos) este reconocimiento por antigüedad ancestral y por bien social!
Magnolo Priego Oliver
presidente de la Asociación de Artistas "D.I.P".
Priegooliver 3 years ago
love <3
q8wizard 3 years ago
Have you noticed that many of the eyes in picassos paintings look like his ovn eyes?/YLIJk
TinoTaliTintti 3 years ago
good video
Dielli1953 3 years ago
What is the song? I'd love to know.
pointyearsrule 3 years ago
The music is Mozart´s 25th symphony.
Great piece of musical art, fits quite well to the topic in this vid :-) Greetings
Tahitianpearl75 3 years ago
You think the music fits? Sorry, but unless you mean it fits by mere virtue enormous artistic merit I couldn't disagree more. Mozart seems to me about as thematically incongruent to the work Picasso as I could imagine and, as I said in an earlier comment, Stravinsky might have been a much better (if too obvious) match.
Forgive my pompous bloviating. ;)
polymath7 3 years ago
Personally I don't like Picasso, I prefer impressionism, but to each their own I suppose.
Miryr 3 years ago
For anyone who does not know, the first picture in this video was "painted" (one is never sure which verb to use with a pastel) when Picasso was fourteen years old. The painting at 6:31 is one I've not seen before, and I was fairly certain i'd seen them all. It obviously dates from around 1923, but can anyone tell me who the sitter is?
(I'm guessing his mother?)
polymath7 3 years ago
I think it's Gertrude Stein, the person who "discovered" Picasso.
richardsowler 3 years ago
Yes, I know who Gertrude stein is; it really doesn't to like her to me.
And the commonplace observation the she discovered Picasso seems to me somewhat debatable.
To me it looks quite a bit more like Picasso's mother and if I'm right that the picture dates from the early twenties (as, if you'll forgive my immodesty, I almost surely am) the sitter appears to be the right age.
Then again, wasn't Picasso's mother dead by then?(I forget what year she died; his father went first, I think in 1915).
polymath7 3 years ago
Nice video, but Mozart's little g minor symphony does not match the images at all.
Stravinsky might have been better.
polymath7 3 years ago
Precious VIDEO!! 5*
ForeverIsis 3 years ago 2
OMFG!!! HATE THIS SHIT!, This gives me nightmares!, It is really hells art!!!
Brandfarligt 3 years ago
pollock was way better!!!
thehunjo2 3 years ago
at 1:11 look at the stairs, I see a face, is it mona lisa?
Blakamo 3 years ago
You're referring, I presume, to the patch of yellow situated to the bottom left of the alter boys foot?
It's very preceptive of you to notice this, but I doubt this passage is intended to represent a face, let alone the Mona Lisa, and I'm sure any appearance to the contrary is incidental.
There is however a distorted image of a skull to be seen in one of Holbein's paintings, and a hidden face in one of Durer's watercolor landscapes, as well as (of course) in many of Dali's pictures.
polymath7 3 years ago
Im an artist myself, I should notice these things :D
Blakamo 3 years ago
bonsoir,c'est une vidéo qui ns conne une idée sur le gd maire.mais j'ai une faveure à vs demander;biensur si vs artiste aussi; c'est de maccompagner pour me confirmer dans le domaine de la peinture ;j'aime peindre et je veux que mon niveau soit bien,ou bien renseignez moi qq'un qui puisse m'aider.merci
ifarguane 3 years ago
Picasso didint only do "Cubisme" he was also a very good figurative painter, but he chose this path because he loved it. and their is nothing wrong with that.
TruePlayerrr 3 years ago
Grande Picasso inventore di uno stile intramontabile.
Ciao
marcam73 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Picasso is a BIG hoax, no composition, no idea, bad use of colors...he was a manufacturated fake geniuos... for what?...for the service of Mr money. Want a real artist??...Dalí. Andy Warhol, another cheat. "Modern Art" acepts any kind of shit...for MOney... Just ask yourself: Does this paint make me feel something??. Picasso is a BIG hoax.
markoctavio 3 years ago
I think he did not want to be literal, ordinary, mediocre and boring, and Warhol just wanted to make happy surfaces.
vokshumana 3 years ago
Yeah, maybe you r right, i wrote this after watch "art school confidential"...i liked what you say about Warhol, sorry for my rage impulse...
markoctavio 3 years ago
Oh MAN!!! Someone thumbs downed me..but I was so intellectual..hahaha
RottenCanoe 3 years ago
whats the song please?????
xg8512 3 years ago
this is mozart for sure. not sure but seem part of "The Magic Flute".
fjons69 3 years ago
yes to mozart, no to magic flute. symphony no 25 in g minor.
rekarrr 3 years ago
This is a great post - thank you, I recently viewed Picasso & His Collection at the Queensland Art Gallery I enjoyed it emencely.
GenericGene 3 years ago
40 years damn, dude.art has no rules therefore everything could be a mistake and it becomes art.picasso was gifted he started doing academic drawings at the age of seven,whats up with famous artists with the same letter initials anyone noticed????
xg8512 3 years ago
Picasso? Mostly bad art.
Don't you people know that the Emperor is naked.
Picasso was a moderate painter who took everyone for one long ride.
How would you know if he made a mistake?
I've tried to find real art in his work for about forty years, but, either I'm missing something, or it's just not there.
And don't get me started on Kandinski or Pollock......
starstyx 3 years ago
Mistake? lol who doesn't make mistakes?
aryul 3 years ago
BRAVO, BRAVO, thank you for putting this up, made my day.
bluffme22 3 years ago
the first picture was his mother
Peachypie153 3 years ago
The funniest thing about Picasso's paintings..and probably ALL paintings for all I know ( I just realized this right now )
is that even when once you got the GIST of what the painting is trying to CAPTURE..there's still the REALITY of what it's trying to capture BEHIND that......endless endless endless!
RottenCanoe 3 years ago
Everyone should be free in the eternity of art and orgasmic thoughts and feelings, Love the world. I breath. The Battle of Guernica, accompanied by the tension of violins....Pablo; Love the name; Picasso; even more,
Art is ours
RomuloTC 3 years ago
I like it very much! 5 stars...
rosangelin 3 years ago
marabilloso sinseramente marabilloso
enuncitio 3 years ago
i came
bRa1N1aK 3 years ago
The statement attributed to Picasso by rosenor8780
"I do not have the effrontery to call myself an artist at all, not in the grand old...etc I am only a clown, a mountebank. I have understood my time and have exploited the imbecility, the vanity, the greed of my contemporaries."
is a well-known fake. It is from a book "Il Libro Nero" by Giovanni Papini (1951) in which Papini invents a fictitious interview with Picasso. Papini invented all sorts of these imaginary interviews.
LGHumphrey 3 years ago
Is that the all seeing eye in some of his work?
Pressence101 3 years ago
Picasso is one of the most important figures of his time. His early figurative work demonstrates great skill as a draftsman. The cubist work shows us a huge intellect at work and his later, free work takes us from our conscious world to another - frequently more exciting and often more disturbing. A master the equal of anf of the great Renaissance painters.
lykovetos 3 years ago
wonderfull
kalpunutmaz 3 years ago
picasso's blue period is so superb, depicting hardship, loneliness, love pain, I like it very much. At 5:45 exquisite!
MIDJOBZ 3 years ago
what school do u go to
1japanop 3 years ago
my teacher hung my picasso painting in the orange county fair since it was so much like his painting
1japanop 3 years ago
Are you actually comparing yourself to him? I have no idea that you "paintings" look like, but I know from your comment that you are pretentious and could never be a real artist. Try doing something original and not imitating someone who was actually creative. ...the county fair? that's almost laughable.
0KeraMarie0 3 years ago
u suck u dont know me u cant say i cant paint u cant paint
1japanop 3 years ago
Your a twat.
Tniggz 3 years ago
some of his stuff grabs my heart others make me question his ability.
6AM1234 3 years ago
Funny guy!
Ultranothing 4 years ago
"I do not have the effrontery to call myself an artist at all, not in the grand old meaning of the word. Giotto, Titian, Rembrandt, Goya were great painters. I am only a clown, a mountebank. I have understood my time and have exploited the imbecility, the vanity, the greed of my contemporaries." (Pablo Picasso, 1951)
rosenor8780 4 years ago
i love him!!! ¡¡muchas gracias por el vídeo!!
tamboxispa 4 years ago