Board Games with Scott 008 - Why Did the Chicken...

[s031720]

so what was the winning answer then?

[AntMan3DFX]

GREAT review! this is great, I have been looking for a board gamefor the family and this is MUCH better than written up reviews on the net. Now I can finally decide what games are for me. THANK YOU !

[fuqnbastard]

this is a bad version of the game for two reasons:

- the judge can determine the winner by the handwriting

- it's more satisfying to make something the group finds funny

it's better this way:

- everybody submits *one* answer for the judge

- the judge will write them down on paper

- everybody will vote for one. - you get a point for each vote

[Radica1Faith]

thats a good idea. I don't have the game yet but it seems you could also put all the submissions together in a pile, and shuffle them up and each player picks one up and reads it to the judge.

Or you could do what you mentioned above, except that the judge reads the answers outloud and each votes on one. That would save time not writing it twice.

[dletter]

@fuqnbastard

Per the handwriting issue, you can get around that and still keep it with one judge per round by having the person to the right of the judge read the answers out loud. Then, the person picking the two "winners" doesn't see the handwriting.

[ORCA4312]

@fuqnbastard Anyone who would manipulate scores in something like this - isn't fit to play games with.

This kind of game is about laughs, not winning.

[akwyd]

u rock man, your shows are worth watching even if u hate board games

[Sweaves]

wakka wakka hahaha

[Sarge3712]

GJ as usual Scott.