Love right-wingers. I think a post-script to what the second man said is in order: Aristotle was an incredibly intelligent individual for his time (and in several areas, e.g. politics, ethics, he's still relevant), something that I'm certain that buffoon at the beginning doesn't appreciate, but he was still the guy who thought men had more teeth than women. So, this man would do himself a favor by thinking twice before quoting him without actually analyzing his writings.
The last time I checked, "slippery slope" was a fallacy, and if this cocksucker (oops!) Stam had any understanding of "debate," he would have known that the crap he pulled could easily flunk him in the debating course.
In polygamy, and infinite number of people can intra-wed which leaves the purpose of marriage (or civil union), from the "government's" perspective, with an infinitely complex task of taxation -- it just simply cannot work.
Quoting Plato and Aristotle while speaking against gay rights. Does anyone else see the irony?
DavidSSabb 1 month ago
polygamy is not a form of marriage, it's a form of slavery. it's apples and oranges.
larrygentry 5 months ago
Love right-wingers. I think a post-script to what the second man said is in order: Aristotle was an incredibly intelligent individual for his time (and in several areas, e.g. politics, ethics, he's still relevant), something that I'm certain that buffoon at the beginning doesn't appreciate, but he was still the guy who thought men had more teeth than women. So, this man would do himself a favor by thinking twice before quoting him without actually analyzing his writings.
SteelCityEcologist 5 months ago
will do DB. you got it all over us.
sirlordford 5 months ago
What an eloquent response.
326742 5 months ago
YES!
1rustyb 5 months ago
LIE PIG li CONS are things too.
They can be used as targets for your favorite rifles.
cmfluteguy 5 months ago
The last time I checked, "slippery slope" was a fallacy, and if this cocksucker (oops!) Stam had any understanding of "debate," he would have known that the crap he pulled could easily flunk him in the debating course.
In polygamy, and infinite number of people can intra-wed which leaves the purpose of marriage (or civil union), from the "government's" perspective, with an infinitely complex task of taxation -- it just simply cannot work.
So Stam's argument is void to begin with.
ninuxy 5 months ago
@ninuxy good thing you don't have to worry about right and wrong or consequences in debate courses, huh.
sirlordford 5 months ago
@sirlordford Slippery slope, by definition is a "logical" fallacy. An automatic fail in any debate.
Go back to your head banging.
ninuxy 5 months ago
Touche! Rep. Glazier
Thanks.
seahorse05 5 months ago 2
Well said. Thank you Mr. Glazier!
wrightju314 5 months ago
"slippy slope" - nicely done.
What a way to put a homophobic elected official in his place.
eddie94603 5 months ago
Avoid NC like the Plague of Hate and Bigotry it will become!
rextrek 5 months ago
Equal protection today and forever!
mlf76 5 months ago
Dehumanization of humans...
... EVIL does that so as to elevate itself above the masses.
maxx1000 5 months ago