Haha! I've been in service in the Bundeswehr until like 7 years ago. I am still laughing hardly, when remembering a visit from US comrades. Half the the guys were walking around with a black eye the next day after firing the MG 3. The kick indeed is quite strong if you're not uesd to it.
Yep we are. Its a slightly altered version of the MG42, they changed the caliber to 7,62 x 51 mm NATO and decreased the rate of fire from 1500 rpm to 1200 rpm to increase its accuracy :)
@45Automag Well it was good then and is better than most mashineguns out there now, so why not. For 5,56mm pussys there still is the MG4. Better for CQB and stuff.
@PowderedAsh well he did say shoulder fire...and you did say bipod...idk ur supposed to use it on the ground hints the fucking bipod like in a window or yah on a vehichle...so idk yall are both wrong/right...
German guns are the best since 100years(Kar98 is still used for hunting due to its accuracy) the american congress should have let the US Army buy the HK416s, not the SCAR-Bullshit they are gonna use now :)
just pull the fucking trigger will you like you can really aim the fucker at 1200 rpm . I want to see 1200rpm inother words hold your finger on the trigger and pull for 60seconds without letting go .
@RealLy96 Like I said, I know the weapons limits. What you just said is nonsense. A barrel glows when you fire 4 or 5 belts of 500 ammo each but the weapon is still good to go. That was my service weapon and I know it way better than you for sure. By the way, the only thing about a glowing barrel is, it ignites the ammo in chamber without pulling the trigger. I am tired of this internet knows all.
@Aniki1609 The rest of the weapon may be fine. But the barrel isn't and just for the record I know from experience. And you don't want the rounds to start cooking off.
@sciencefreak2402 It does fire some rounds without pulling the trigger when the gun sustains prolonged fire. Any ammo who finds a glowing chamber will ignite itself off without the trigger action Someone said that the barrel needs to be changed after 150 rounds, but that is false. ( and funny)
@ibilliedyourmomhard Barrels on LMG's are built to last due to their thickness and the way the millitary clean them after each firing or at the end of each day of patrol, most barrels will last a good year of abuse.
Whoever said about 150 rounds = Barrel change needs to get a new brain on the millitary channel. :D
@Aniki1609 Actually the MG3 like most modern machine guns fires from an open bolt. For this reason to have a cook off in and MG3 (or an FN minimi, or an FN Mag) the feed tray would have to be hot enough to ignite the primer and in such case it would just blow up in the feed tray likely disabling the gun. Any runaway guns in these MG's would have to be due to mechanical failure and not overheating. Also firing 2500 rounds without a barrel change is possible but definitely not advisable.
@MrZerostr don´t forget the G3, we call it AK4 in sweden. As member of the homeguard I´m a big fan of the G3, the only thing I dont like about it´s that it have so many parts. But thumps up for german waepons tech.
NATO, is frankly inept. Pity, but it is. Being a service member ( US) they eat well, take on low risk missions, and hide well when it hits the fan. However, this weapon, MG42 roller locked blowback is the basis for some of the BEST, and I mean BEST LMG's around - take this any day over an M60 POS I had to fight with. Cyclic rates aren't a prob, this dumb shooter breaking sight plane and not having a spotter is !! A 249 SAW is way outclassed with this
every piece of weaponry in the last 80 years was developed by the germans or based on german technology , the first jet , ak 47 based on german stg 44 , rockets science etc. , if the germans would have had 2 more years they'd been flying over manhatten with UFO's .
Now germans developed the best tank in the world once again , selling 200 of those to the saudis , no matter where you go in the world , whoever you ask , if you want a decent weapon , go check for the made in germany mark .
@SmexerP Did you know Germany had designs for the same stealth bombers the U.S. uses today in 1944, and chemical gas that could cause more damage than the atomic bomb if deployed, not to mention the Sturmgewehr vierunvierzig was the first assault rifle ever built? Though, can you link me to a page about those tanks?
@thecrowandthehawk Correction.. US have stealth bombers copied/ derivated primarily from german 1944 designs. And about those gases you write about..no one is as toxic as atomic radiations that remain for years! Not the case of the gases.
@tuyocuyo Would you like to talk more of what you know nothing of? Maybe you'd prefer to read the same official FBI report I was reading. You don't even know the name of "those gasses", but oh wait, you can just google search it and pretend you know in your next response! genius! Also, you seriously believe any country is going to send in people to inhabit radiated land? You must be stupid, radiation doesn't count for anything in war after the initial destruction.
@thecrowandthehawk Whenever you finish reading Harper's or Reader's Digest..we can discuss the way you try to look as a wanna be..."magician"?... wizzard?.... nerd?.. sure! Mr.Falling pidgeon.
@thecrowandthehawk Shhh! ok kid.. are we alone?.. nobody listens?.. alright!.. I have some questions. Can you tell me why was John Lennon murdered?.. Can you tell me who ordered Princess Diana to be killed?..Do you know who orchestred 9/11?...do you know where and when A. Hitler died?,i have more questions...but first of all I need to know if you have the sources you say you have. shhhh!
In the general direction of the enemy? Less than half a second.
*Learning* how to get the grouping displayed on the target-board (note the size of the circles when they are inspecting it up front) takes a bit longer, especially with an extremely fast-firing gun and an unfamiliar weapon at that.
@lazyG007 you do know that the limit has been pretty mutch removed right ? germany can now have 800 000 soldíers but they dont need em, quarter mil is more then plenty to defend germany especially with the tech they got.the size of an army is not important, look at the US, we got a little over 1 million and we are loosing in afghanistan against a bunch of camel fuckers
@tuyocuyo Looks like I hit a nerve. I tend to be good at that, so if you're ready to throw another tantrum and attack me like just now it's completely natural. And you can say what you want about our equipment, but it's called "technology". You should try using it some time. Now let me get this straight, you're butthurt because we have good equipment? Not only that but you apparently don't understand the definition of the slang 'redneck'. Would you happen to have a point in that rant?
@thecrowandthehawk I won´t waste my time with the old gossip woman you seem to be.Nerve?..hahaha my stomach!..just to read your officious speech.... go on..kid.
@thecrowandthehawk woopy, when i was in iraq after we "took" it i was still beeing shot at with ak's and RPG's, when i was in afghanistan last year i was beein shot at with ak's and RPG's watchd several of my friends getting killed by IED's and suicide bomber's without us even getting one of them, those that sound like we are winning to you ? sounds more like getting ass raped with a barbedwire dick. camel fuckers are kicking our asses,we need to get more extreme if we wanna win this war
@Plauze666 Das geht doch gar nicht, du musst alle Übungen mit allen Waffen bestehen für die Schnur, es gibt keine P8 Goldschnur oder MG3. Nur die zusammenfassende Schützenschnur also erzähl hier kein dummes Zeug!
@Unterkieferjones Lies, bevor du deine Fresse aufmachst! P8 Gold + MG3 Gold + G36 Gold = Schützenschnur Gold. Ich hab lediglich geschrieben, dass ich die Wertungen alle Gold geschossen habe, also die SchSchn in Gold habe.
NEED simple AOG scope and super powerful super powerful LASER DOT green one and BUZZ SAW city I did this to SAW and it works great...this would be perfect then. Take a big site in target about 2ft across and range the weapon start at 300 yards and site in to 500 yards.
@modernwar44 OK simplify --this weapon is a WW2 era fast speed machin gun that shoots a pretty good size BULLET...it has good accuracy but try to see out to 200 or 300 yards and hit something> won;t happen so if a scope and nice laser site is attached then it will be devestating.
I hope the uploader was impressed by the german weapons, their weapons engineers tend to think more about actual combat then shooting ranges.
btw, i hear they toned down the RPM slightly with the MG3 compared to the MG42, most shoot at fastest, 1000-1100 RPM, the manual just says it can go as fast as 1200, correct me if im wrong
they should stick a reflex sight on the MG3, i think that would help in target acquisition
@John234pwns LOL, are you serious? you have no idea what you're talking about. I'm sorry but America doesn't equal to god. Don't throw random bullshit out there and expect me to believe it.
@PapiSmerf Actually the leadership has it's placings, it's just not publicly revealed. The fact is that each country contributes part and not all of their resources to this organization under a fairly organized hierarchy of rule. When called upon, I have no doubt in my mind that NATO will act quick, and very effectively.
@thecrowandthehawk Yep, I am serious. Look it up if you will. And I think it's rather moronic you think that would make us godlike: money isn't everything, and it's part of the reason our deficit is so bad.
@thecrowandthehawk LOL, nato doesnt do shit but "warn" offenders...........everyone ignores their dumbass warnings. They dont do shit but talk and even that does no good because nobody listens to them...
@coog7896 I'm sorry, I didn't know you were a NATO intelligence agent who could tell me how many classified tactics and military operations they're operating over. Perhaps once you actually understand how military organizations work you'll be able to comment back without looking like a dumbass to anyone who understands anything about this organization.
@thecrowandthehawk lol, nobody needs to be a part of nato to know that dont do jack aside from "warning" offenders. The US ALWAYS has to step in because nato is all talk...nato BLOWS, thats all there is to know.
@coog7896 You don't have to put 'LOL' at the begging of every sentence, it just shows how shallow you are. Also, you can go ahead and keep saying that NATO "blows" and can't do anything, but it's really not going to make a difference. If you hacked into one of their hidden servers I guarantee you would be dead before you go to sleep tonight. NATO preforms some serious shit, and the fact that nobody knows about it is proof of their efficiency. Have fun in your world of ignorance.
@ballsofsteel547 I've already corrected this once. The U.S. funds less than a quarter of NATO. Actually it's closer to a fifth. I'm guessing you're quoting CNN. Do some research, not just casually glancing at what you see. NATO is mainly powered by Europe (France, Germany, UK ect.)
@RedSuit1 Mostly Europe. Contrary to what I'm sure your beliefs are, the U.S. only provides for a small portion of NATO. As I'm sure you can see I really don't feel like going into this argument again. Read my other comments if you want proof.
@Devicty Are you referring to The US, Germany, Britian, And France? The same countries that destroyed about half the world in WWII? Don't make me laugh, anyone of those countries are considered world superpowers and would mop the floor with almost any other country besides themselves. All have worse than nuclear capability at their disposal not to mention ridiculously capable soldiers and will use them if pressured.
@thecrowandthehawk Im taling bout NATO and if I do remember In that war the French got their asses kicked and Britan was at a stalemate with Germany until the U.S came and kicked ass and took name and at the same time fought the Jap's. The U.S has the power to take on any country with or with out NATO.
@Devicty you said exactly what i was thinking. nazis, veitkong, taliban/ al queda, next: north korea, hell yes. i would join the army to fight north korea any day
@Devicty France's government was on the brink of civil war at the Time. Germany was completely dominating Brittan, and it was Russia that were the ones that actually pushed Germany back, though the U.S. did play a significant role in that, as well as defeating the Japanese air force and NAVY. Oh, and is that why the U.S. got their assess handed to them when dealing with Chinese troops assisted with Russian technology?
@thecrowandthehawk In the Vietnam war the reason we lost was because the North would do peace talks with the U.S like every 2 weeks thus creating a ceas fire allowing the North to resupply. If it was not for that we would have won that war in a matter of months. Besides the only reason they used Russian tech is because it was cheap and it was what was avalable.
@Devicty We weren't actually fighting the Vietnamese at all, it was more of the thousands of Chinese that would storm U.S. positions. And without the AK 47 to assist them, it would've been easy. The fact of the matter is we need NATO, to protect us from the communist (or supposedly former communist) forces. As I'm sure you know, russia doesn't like us anymore than they did 30 years ago.
@Devicty thanks, don't get me wrong the U.S. is a powerful country, but standing up to multiple superpowers is a different story. Germany proved that when they had a superior military in almost every aspect compared to the rest of the world and lost. The only advantage the U.S. had was all of it's resources, allies, and air force.
@thecrowandthehawk i think the men on the ground also made the difference. personally i feel that american soldiers in ww2 was one tough cookie....not saying that the germans weren't great fighters in their own sense but i think americans often fight by sheer force and germans with tactics like the blitzkrieg
@dinodinororo Americans had the numbers and resources, just like Russia. The one thing that set them apart was that the U.S. had the second best equipped army of WWII, where as Russia just pumped troops in. Look up statistics on the different German SS divisions. They had a kill ratio of 1:10 against the allies. German troops had better tactics, equipment and training. The SS themselves were actually trained to fight under U.S. air control (which is ridiculously hard). They were both tough
1200 rounds per min ? this a machine from Hell !
bunnyrabbit008 1 week ago
Haha! I've been in service in the Bundeswehr until like 7 years ago. I am still laughing hardly, when remembering a visit from US comrades. Half the the guys were walking around with a black eye the next day after firing the MG 3. The kick indeed is quite strong if you're not uesd to it.
StarSheriff110 2 months ago 2
do they still have MG3s in the german army?
Deathbyreality1 3 months ago
@Deathbyreality1 Yes and also the new MG4.
FrancisJoa 3 months ago
jag förstår fan inte tyska så prata engelska
sumfunshit 3 months ago
Could someone tell me why this is being replaced? I mean from what I looked up it seems like a really good reliable design. Where is the fault?
Kdanc86 3 months ago
So wait is germany still using mondern version of the mg-42????
45Automag 3 months ago 18
@45Automag It's nearly the same ;p ..only little things have been changed but it's still the best :)
In the last years, the new MG3 is coming to the troops. The first MG that only needs one person.
TheSkullCrossbone 3 months ago
@45Automag And its still good :D
Arschlocheule 3 months ago
@45Automag
Yep we are. Its a slightly altered version of the MG42, they changed the caliber to 7,62 x 51 mm NATO and decreased the rate of fire from 1500 rpm to 1200 rpm to increase its accuracy :)
Beakle 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@45Automag yes but now they call it MG3
nerfguns25 3 months ago
@45Automag Many European countries do.
Why? Because its probably still the best 7.62 LMG out there.
iGottaRandomName 3 months ago
@45Automag Hell yeah :D
102Sebi 2 months ago
@45Automag why wouldnt they? the MG42 was a spectacular weapon
supergamer73 2 months ago
@45Automag Google: HK 121 =)
Trustds07 2 months ago
@45Automag Well it was good then and is better than most mashineguns out there now, so why not. For 5,56mm pussys there still is the MG4. Better for CQB and stuff.
berhorn 1 month ago
@45Automag what did you expect mg3 is awesome
turkeyforever100 1 month ago
@45Automag
Well the US still uses the .50 caliber MG which was made in the early 1930's.
Good designs dont have a best-before date!
FredDude27 1 month ago
Wollt nur mal nen paar schnelle grüße nach Kusel senden und die 2./345 grüßen!!!
P.S. Ich hab gold ihr amis habts einfach net drauf!!! Aber is ja auch kein wunder wenn ihr mit der m249 knattert also merke bigger is better!!!!!!
FAUSTFEUERWAFFE 4 months ago
Cool, die BW zeigt der Army wie man MG3 schießt :-)
MrThunfischpizza1 4 months ago
Cool die BW zeigt der Army wie man MG3 schießt :-)
MrThunfischpizza1 4 months ago
am besten an diesem video gefällt mir der gehörschutz =/
StrashBkOne 4 months ago
hahahahaha omg first off its deff a german look at the flag!! second im suprised that guy hit shit the way he was shooting
paulyost111 4 months ago
no no no, you are meant to physically mount that weapon to a fixed position, not meant for shoulder fire at all.
theREALmrgein 4 months ago
@theREALmrgein then why ohh why would it have a stock and a bipod?!
PowderedAsh 4 months ago
@theREALmrgein then why ohh why would it have a stock and a bipod?!
PowderedAsh 4 months ago
@PowderedAsh well he did say shoulder fire...and you did say bipod...idk ur supposed to use it on the ground hints the fucking bipod like in a window or yah on a vehichle...so idk yall are both wrong/right...
sjc878787 4 months ago
1:37 *Sleight of hand!*
mickeysfunhouse 4 months ago
@mickeysfunhouse 1:37 Practice and experience
xxk3str3lxx 4 months ago
Qualifying in Silver is not too bad! Real easy to drop just a point or two and you miss Gold.
I won Gold in 1992 when VK314 was shooting.
milesfortis 5 months ago
I love it when the amis try to write "Schützenschnur" xD
TheYYStormYYY 5 months ago
and then u pikc a song about people dying in the army LOL
machielste1 5 months ago
çok kullandım ben mg3
nabiz34 5 months ago
HOLD THE TRIGGER. Well its the german army. Im not supprised.
vurre222 5 months ago
@vurre222 its the american army pay attention
Crazy89768 5 months ago
@vurre222
It's an American soldier at the trigger you silly kid.
TankerUSA 5 months ago
One - Metallica!
JoySlashMoevies 5 months ago
German guns are the best since 100years(Kar98 is still used for hunting due to its accuracy) the american congress should have let the US Army buy the HK416s, not the SCAR-Bullshit they are gonna use now :)
royalking111 5 months ago
@royalking111 I'm fine as long as they get rid of the M16
blublur437 5 months ago
One
Chris40679 5 months ago
i'm falling a fucking sleep! have you shot the gun yet!
sk8forlife90 5 months ago
One is about 1200 rounds per minute but black metal is about 1800 rounds per minute :)
Chaanee 5 months ago
Mute that damn music. I want guns, not a pile of poop.
SwaffyX 5 months ago
@SwaffyX fuck you metallica is awesome
HuGoDaN100 5 months ago
@SwaffyX Gay hoofd
kay4x4 5 months ago
just pull the fucking trigger will you like you can really aim the fucker at 1200 rpm . I want to see 1200rpm inother words hold your finger on the trigger and pull for 60seconds without letting go .
darksidehumourxx 5 months ago
@darksidehumourxx
yeah if he wanna aim that slow go get a sniper rifle! i wanna see 1200 imba shots *sigh*. i'm outa ere.
PhazeyBlur 5 months ago
@PhazeyBlur
Thats not possible with the MG3, you would destroy the weapon... -.-
RealLy96 5 months ago
@RealLy96 No you won't. Trust me, I know this weapon. It was my service weapon over 6 long years and I know the weapon's limits.
Aniki1609 5 months ago
@Aniki1609
You have to change the barrel after 150 shots ;) If you ever had an instruction on this weapon, you would know that ;)
After 500 shots the barrel glows... With 1200 in sustained fire you wouldn't hit anything, but destroy the barrel and your weapon...
RealLy96 5 months ago
@RealLy96 Like I said, I know the weapons limits. What you just said is nonsense. A barrel glows when you fire 4 or 5 belts of 500 ammo each but the weapon is still good to go. That was my service weapon and I know it way better than you for sure. By the way, the only thing about a glowing barrel is, it ignites the ammo in chamber without pulling the trigger. I am tired of this internet knows all.
Aniki1609 5 months ago 33
@Aniki1609 The rest of the weapon may be fine. But the barrel isn't and just for the record I know from experience. And you don't want the rounds to start cooking off.
Sturm119 4 months ago
@Aniki1609 so if you had a continues feed of bullets, couldn't the gun shoot by its self after it turns red with out pulling the trigger?
sciencefreak2402 3 months ago
@sciencefreak2402 It does fire some rounds without pulling the trigger when the gun sustains prolonged fire. Any ammo who finds a glowing chamber will ignite itself off without the trigger action Someone said that the barrel needs to be changed after 150 rounds, but that is false. ( and funny)
Aniki1609 3 months ago
@Aniki1609 I also heard that (about changing the barrel after 150 rounds) on the military channel. Not sure if its true or not.
ibilliedyourmomhard 3 months ago
Comment removed
matty555123 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ibilliedyourmomhard Barrels on LMG's are built to last due to their thickness and the way the millitary clean them after each firing or at the end of each day of patrol, most barrels will last a good year of abuse.
Whoever said about 150 rounds = Barrel change needs to get a new brain on the millitary channel. :D
matty555123 3 months ago
@Aniki1609 Actually the MG3 like most modern machine guns fires from an open bolt. For this reason to have a cook off in and MG3 (or an FN minimi, or an FN Mag) the feed tray would have to be hot enough to ignite the primer and in such case it would just blow up in the feed tray likely disabling the gun. Any runaway guns in these MG's would have to be due to mechanical failure and not overheating. Also firing 2500 rounds without a barrel change is possible but definitely not advisable.
Nichol5946 3 months ago
^To use somehow ignorant sacrilege, an anti-war song as a backing for "I-got-the-greatest-imperialism" videos ..
I talk German good
StepDante 5 months ago
You would be surprised kid!..
tuyocuyo 6 months ago
jaja, die waffe nicht mal selbst laden können und schon rumballern wie ein grosser..
SpEziALiZt80 6 months ago
air force faggots shooting guns?
FuelCellZz 6 months ago
Does that guy shooting have a hitler stash?
Curevicc 6 months ago
metallica - one
Itachi21x 6 months ago
Metallica FTW!!!
XrayLancer14 6 months ago 2
The MG-3 is the best German MG
TheAlaar 6 months ago
Germans make the best stuff. German Beer, Sham-Wow, the MP5, MP7, G36 series of rifles, MG42, MG3.
MrZerostr 6 months ago
@MrZerostr hell yeah:D
LuckyUnited 6 months ago
@MrZerostr don´t forget the G3, we call it AK4 in sweden. As member of the homeguard I´m a big fan of the G3, the only thing I dont like about it´s that it have so many parts. But thumps up for german waepons tech.
Sp7tfu10 6 months ago
NATO, is frankly inept. Pity, but it is. Being a service member ( US) they eat well, take on low risk missions, and hide well when it hits the fan. However, this weapon, MG42 roller locked blowback is the basis for some of the BEST, and I mean BEST LMG's around - take this any day over an M60 POS I had to fight with. Cyclic rates aren't a prob, this dumb shooter breaking sight plane and not having a spotter is !! A 249 SAW is way outclassed with this
goosenekkr 6 months ago
Irgendwie auch ignoranter Frevel, ein Anti-Kriegs-Lied als Unterlegung für "Ich-hab-den-größten-Imperialismus"-Videos zu benutzen..
mediaFDG 6 months ago 37
@mediaFDG I thumbed it up, so now, it is only fair if you tell me what it means!!
ZombieSlayerMovies 6 months ago
@mediaFDG und doch schaust du es dir an...
teutonalex 6 months ago
@mediaFDG hell yah what he said!!
sjc878787 4 months ago
As I know,best forces are Russia
didogazeto 6 months ago
Germany, where the best beer and guns are made
MrAlcapone24 6 months ago
Comment removed
muellerkaecker 6 months ago
every piece of weaponry in the last 80 years was developed by the germans or based on german technology , the first jet , ak 47 based on german stg 44 , rockets science etc. , if the germans would have had 2 more years they'd been flying over manhatten with UFO's .
Now germans developed the best tank in the world once again , selling 200 of those to the saudis , no matter where you go in the world , whoever you ask , if you want a decent weapon , go check for the made in germany mark .
SmexerP 6 months ago
@SmexerP Did you know Germany had designs for the same stealth bombers the U.S. uses today in 1944, and chemical gas that could cause more damage than the atomic bomb if deployed, not to mention the Sturmgewehr vierunvierzig was the first assault rifle ever built? Though, can you link me to a page about those tanks?
thecrowandthehawk 6 months ago
@thecrowandthehawk Correction.. US have stealth bombers copied/ derivated primarily from german 1944 designs. And about those gases you write about..no one is as toxic as atomic radiations that remain for years! Not the case of the gases.
tuyocuyo 6 months ago
@tuyocuyo Would you like to talk more of what you know nothing of? Maybe you'd prefer to read the same official FBI report I was reading. You don't even know the name of "those gasses", but oh wait, you can just google search it and pretend you know in your next response! genius! Also, you seriously believe any country is going to send in people to inhabit radiated land? You must be stupid, radiation doesn't count for anything in war after the initial destruction.
thecrowandthehawk 6 months ago
@thecrowandthehawk Whenever you finish reading Harper's or Reader's Digest..we can discuss the way you try to look as a wanna be..."magician"?... wizzard?.... nerd?.. sure! Mr.Falling pidgeon.
tuyocuyo 6 months ago
@tuyocuyo I'm staring at CIA file from 1945 right now. I could care less what you believe, but don't talk shit about what you don't know about.
thecrowandthehawk 6 months ago
@thecrowandthehawk Shhh! ok kid.. are we alone?.. nobody listens?.. alright!.. I have some questions. Can you tell me why was John Lennon murdered?.. Can you tell me who ordered Princess Diana to be killed?..Do you know who orchestred 9/11?...do you know where and when A. Hitler died?,i have more questions...but first of all I need to know if you have the sources you say you have. shhhh!
tuyocuyo 6 months ago
fail
travis199urkul 6 months ago
this MG jam liked crazy!
catbug666 6 months ago
shoot the Goddamn thing already
billymayer1000 6 months ago
that would level a mud hut in 2 seconds I bet
giftedkidrules 6 months ago
How long does it take to aim a fucking machine gun?
rockead77 7 months ago
@rockead77
In the general direction of the enemy? Less than half a second.
*Learning* how to get the grouping displayed on the target-board (note the size of the circles when they are inspecting it up front) takes a bit longer, especially with an extremely fast-firing gun and an unfamiliar weapon at that.
BPo75 6 months ago
@rockead77 Just a few fucking seconds.
tuyocuyo 6 months ago
hurray german army and german technology
MrThePsychologist 7 months ago 77
@MrThePsychologist u forgot to mension Metallica
CARLISLOL 6 months ago
@MrThePsychologist you are a big idiot
the best army in the world is the german army ....... all night long
libertateaaa 6 months ago
@libertateaaa germany is hardly allowed to have an army at all
lazyG007 6 months ago
@lazyG007 Don't you just love the U.S.?
thecrowandthehawk 6 months ago
@lazyG007 you do know that the limit has been pretty mutch removed right ? germany can now have 800 000 soldíers but they dont need em, quarter mil is more then plenty to defend germany especially with the tech they got.the size of an army is not important, look at the US, we got a little over 1 million and we are loosing in afghanistan against a bunch of camel fuckers
SuperMachinegunner 6 months ago
@SuperMachinegunner who told you that the U.S. is loosing? We just took Iraq not too long ago, I'd say that's an accomplishment.
thecrowandthehawk 6 months ago
@thecrowandthehawk You "took" Iraq?.. hahaha,, You stole Iraq!.. but you kill from tanks, planes, ships, choppers..and atack weak conuntries...(rednecks aren't brave soldiers)....brave?.. germans, afghanistanian, Iraqi patriots, cuban soldiers,!!!
tuyocuyo 6 months ago
@tuyocuyo Looks like I hit a nerve. I tend to be good at that, so if you're ready to throw another tantrum and attack me like just now it's completely natural. And you can say what you want about our equipment, but it's called "technology". You should try using it some time. Now let me get this straight, you're butthurt because we have good equipment? Not only that but you apparently don't understand the definition of the slang 'redneck'. Would you happen to have a point in that rant?
thecrowandthehawk 6 months ago
@thecrowandthehawk I won´t waste my time with the old gossip woman you seem to be.Nerve?..hahaha my stomach!..just to read your officious speech.... go on..kid.
tuyocuyo 6 months ago
@thecrowandthehawk woopy, when i was in iraq after we "took" it i was still beeing shot at with ak's and RPG's, when i was in afghanistan last year i was beein shot at with ak's and RPG's watchd several of my friends getting killed by IED's and suicide bomber's without us even getting one of them, those that sound like we are winning to you ? sounds more like getting ass raped with a barbedwire dick. camel fuckers are kicking our asses,we need to get more extreme if we wanna win this war
SuperMachinegunner 6 months ago
@MrThePsychologist dann schreib doch auch deutsch wenn dus sso cool findest du vollidiot
Ruppi287 5 months ago
Yeah, the MG3 blows through ammo faster than a thai Hooker...
ForfeMac 7 months ago
@ForfeMac pretty sure you ripped that joke.
thecrowandthehawk 6 months ago
AMAZING SONG
killa4eva50 7 months ago
Yay, I got Gold in MG3, G36 and P8! :)
Plauze666 7 months ago
@Plauze666 Das geht doch gar nicht, du musst alle Übungen mit allen Waffen bestehen für die Schnur, es gibt keine P8 Goldschnur oder MG3. Nur die zusammenfassende Schützenschnur also erzähl hier kein dummes Zeug!
Unterkieferjones 6 months ago
@Unterkieferjones Lies, bevor du deine Fresse aufmachst! P8 Gold + MG3 Gold + G36 Gold = Schützenschnur Gold. Ich hab lediglich geschrieben, dass ich die Wertungen alle Gold geschossen habe, also die SchSchn in Gold habe.
Plauze666 6 months ago
loooooooooooool silver in mg3 xD
xystreamzz 7 months ago
Metallica playing one is just enough for me
gre68 7 months ago
that things wastes bullets like it was cool ? xD
530patriot 7 months ago
how long is this range?
GimblePike 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
#LOL #LOL #LOL
killerthe3rd 7 months ago
METALLICAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
mr4METALLICA 7 months ago
#LOL !!!!!!
NAKALIMOTKO09 7 months ago
NEED simple AOG scope and super powerful super powerful LASER DOT green one and BUZZ SAW city I did this to SAW and it works great...this would be perfect then. Take a big site in target about 2ft across and range the weapon start at 300 yards and site in to 500 yards.
CBAsystems 7 months ago
@CBAsystems what?
modernwar44 7 months ago
@modernwar44 OK simplify --this weapon is a WW2 era fast speed machin gun that shoots a pretty good size BULLET...it has good accuracy but try to see out to 200 or 300 yards and hit something> won;t happen so if a scope and nice laser site is attached then it will be devestating.
CBAsystems 7 months ago
@CBAsystems um, its not that i dint understand what you were getting at, its that i didnt understand how you were wording it
modernwar44 7 months ago
@modernwar44 Well I do understand ,thanks
CBAsystems 7 months ago
I hope the uploader was impressed by the german weapons, their weapons engineers tend to think more about actual combat then shooting ranges.
btw, i hear they toned down the RPM slightly with the MG3 compared to the MG42, most shoot at fastest, 1000-1100 RPM, the manual just says it can go as fast as 1200, correct me if im wrong
they should stick a reflex sight on the MG3, i think that would help in target acquisition
Elc22 7 months ago
HOLY FUCK JUST SHOOT IT
norcofoxrider 7 months ago
Isnt the MG3 the modern version of the MG42?
ZigZag1808 7 months ago
i hate the song :D
MistaSinistra 7 months ago
when you have to throw the most lead down range..except no imitations
1ukjunglednbraver 7 months ago
any guy with a moustache like that can do ANYTHING
santasdeath1 7 months ago
1:04 - 1:06 pure fastness - i swear
2herosofwar 7 months ago
The U.S. is not the most powerful force this world has even known. N.A.T.O. is.
thecrowandthehawk 7 months ago 14
@thecrowandthehawk
Of course, since the U.S. does most of N.A.T.O's work.
chiconspiracy 7 months ago
@thecrowandthehawk NATO can't even afford it's own ammunition.... And that's given that the U.S. funds 75% of NATO.
PapiSmerf 7 months ago
@PapiSmerf The U.S. funds less than a quarter of N.A.T.O., do your homework.
thecrowandthehawk 7 months ago
@thecrowandthehawk That'll be the last time I quote CNN, thank you.
PapiSmerf 7 months ago
@PapiSmerf no problem, I too enjoy being proven wrong.
thecrowandthehawk 7 months ago
@PapiSmerf Keeps Winchester and American Eagle in business...now ATK kicks out rounds...MAGTECH is good too for plinking.
CBAsystems 7 months ago
@thecrowandthehawk Just so you know, the US military's budget is more than the rest of the world combined.
John234pwns 7 months ago
@John234pwns LOL, are you serious? you have no idea what you're talking about. I'm sorry but America doesn't equal to god. Don't throw random bullshit out there and expect me to believe it.
thecrowandthehawk 7 months ago
@thecrowandthehawk Military is top notch, leadership is bullshit. Kind of like giving a baby seal a live grenade...
PapiSmerf 7 months ago
@PapiSmerf Actually the leadership has it's placings, it's just not publicly revealed. The fact is that each country contributes part and not all of their resources to this organization under a fairly organized hierarchy of rule. When called upon, I have no doubt in my mind that NATO will act quick, and very effectively.
thecrowandthehawk 7 months ago
@thecrowandthehawk Yep, I am serious. Look it up if you will. And I think it's rather moronic you think that would make us godlike: money isn't everything, and it's part of the reason our deficit is so bad.
John234pwns 7 months ago
@thecrowandthehawk LOL, nato doesnt do shit but "warn" offenders...........everyone ignores their dumbass warnings. They dont do shit but talk and even that does no good because nobody listens to them...
coog7896 7 months ago
@coog7896 I'm sorry, I didn't know you were a NATO intelligence agent who could tell me how many classified tactics and military operations they're operating over. Perhaps once you actually understand how military organizations work you'll be able to comment back without looking like a dumbass to anyone who understands anything about this organization.
thecrowandthehawk 7 months ago
@thecrowandthehawk lol, nobody needs to be a part of nato to know that dont do jack aside from "warning" offenders. The US ALWAYS has to step in because nato is all talk...nato BLOWS, thats all there is to know.
coog7896 7 months ago
@coog7896 You don't have to put 'LOL' at the begging of every sentence, it just shows how shallow you are. Also, you can go ahead and keep saying that NATO "blows" and can't do anything, but it's really not going to make a difference. If you hacked into one of their hidden servers I guarantee you would be dead before you go to sleep tonight. NATO preforms some serious shit, and the fact that nobody knows about it is proof of their efficiency. Have fun in your world of ignorance.
thecrowandthehawk 7 months ago
@thecrowandthehawk 95% of NATO's funding: by the USA
89% of the UN's budget: by the USA
so in essence the UN and NATO are the USA
ballsofsteel547 7 months ago
@ballsofsteel547 I've already corrected this once. The U.S. funds less than a quarter of NATO. Actually it's closer to a fifth. I'm guessing you're quoting CNN. Do some research, not just casually glancing at what you see. NATO is mainly powered by Europe (France, Germany, UK ect.)
thecrowandthehawk 7 months ago
@thecrowandthehawk lulz USA created nato ._.
joik2ww 7 months ago
@thecrowandthehawk hey um isnt the US part of NATO?? correct me if i am wrong.
JonasHater96 7 months ago
@JonasHater96 You are correct. The U.S funds 20-25% of NATO
thecrowandthehawk 7 months ago
@thecrowandthehawk Ok thanks I thought I was right
JonasHater96 7 months ago
@JonasHater96 No problem, anytime.
thecrowandthehawk 7 months ago
@thecrowandthehawk Come at us bro
thatghillyguy 7 months ago
@thecrowandthehawk
Guess who makes N.A.T.O the most powerful force the world has ever known
RedSuit1 7 months ago
@RedSuit1 Mostly Europe. Contrary to what I'm sure your beliefs are, the U.S. only provides for a small portion of NATO. As I'm sure you can see I really don't feel like going into this argument again. Read my other comments if you want proof.
thecrowandthehawk 7 months ago
@thecrowandthehawk
Europe is reterded
RedSuit1 7 months ago
@RedSuit1 You most likely insulted 99.9 percent of the people here with you ignorance. How about this: you're retarded.
thecrowandthehawk 7 months ago
@thecrowandthehawk
NO UR ERETERDED
RedSuit1 7 months ago
@thecrowandthehawk Thats cause its made up of nations that can't really fight for themselves.
Devicty 6 months ago
Comment removed
THEBOSS80001 6 months ago
@Devicty Are you referring to The US, Germany, Britian, And France? The same countries that destroyed about half the world in WWII? Don't make me laugh, anyone of those countries are considered world superpowers and would mop the floor with almost any other country besides themselves. All have worse than nuclear capability at their disposal not to mention ridiculously capable soldiers and will use them if pressured.
thecrowandthehawk 6 months ago
@thecrowandthehawk Im taling bout NATO and if I do remember In that war the French got their asses kicked and Britan was at a stalemate with Germany until the U.S came and kicked ass and took name and at the same time fought the Jap's. The U.S has the power to take on any country with or with out NATO.
Devicty 6 months ago
@Devicty you said exactly what i was thinking. nazis, veitkong, taliban/ al queda, next: north korea, hell yes. i would join the army to fight north korea any day
billymayer1000 6 months ago
@Devicty France's government was on the brink of civil war at the Time. Germany was completely dominating Brittan, and it was Russia that were the ones that actually pushed Germany back, though the U.S. did play a significant role in that, as well as defeating the Japanese air force and NAVY. Oh, and is that why the U.S. got their assess handed to them when dealing with Chinese troops assisted with Russian technology?
thecrowandthehawk 6 months ago
@thecrowandthehawk In the Vietnam war the reason we lost was because the North would do peace talks with the U.S like every 2 weeks thus creating a ceas fire allowing the North to resupply. If it was not for that we would have won that war in a matter of months. Besides the only reason they used Russian tech is because it was cheap and it was what was avalable.
Devicty 6 months ago
@Devicty We weren't actually fighting the Vietnamese at all, it was more of the thousands of Chinese that would storm U.S. positions. And without the AK 47 to assist them, it would've been easy. The fact of the matter is we need NATO, to protect us from the communist (or supposedly former communist) forces. As I'm sure you know, russia doesn't like us anymore than they did 30 years ago.
thecrowandthehawk 6 months ago
@thecrowandthehawk Ok I guess you're kinda right.
Devicty 6 months ago
@Devicty thanks, don't get me wrong the U.S. is a powerful country, but standing up to multiple superpowers is a different story. Germany proved that when they had a superior military in almost every aspect compared to the rest of the world and lost. The only advantage the U.S. had was all of it's resources, allies, and air force.
thecrowandthehawk 6 months ago
@thecrowandthehawk i think the men on the ground also made the difference. personally i feel that american soldiers in ww2 was one tough cookie....not saying that the germans weren't great fighters in their own sense but i think americans often fight by sheer force and germans with tactics like the blitzkrieg
dinodinororo 6 months ago
@dinodinororo Americans had the numbers and resources, just like Russia. The one thing that set them apart was that the U.S. had the second best equipped army of WWII, where as Russia just pumped troops in. Look up statistics on the different German SS divisions. They had a kill ratio of 1:10 against the allies. German troops had better tactics, equipment and training. The SS themselves were actually trained to fight under U.S. air control (which is ridiculously hard). They were both tough
thecrowandthehawk 6 months ago 2
@thecrowandthehawk Agree
59LOWLIFE 6 months ago
@Devicty Sure! because US is the No.1 Terrorist State!.. and..by the way, have the biggest amount of addicts, (40 million?)
tuyocuyo 6 months ago
@tuyocuyo Care to back up that statement with some proof? Get off the internet you immature prick.
Devicty 6 months ago
@Devicty Sure childish redneck!.. what proof do you want me to show?..but first of all : Am I allowed to remain in YOUR internet?...
tuyocuyo 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@thecrowandthehawk the us is the most powerful country in the world ever
billymayer1000 6 months ago
@thecrowandthehawk
hmmm, No
tritop 6 months ago
@thecrowandthehawk nato is an organiztion, not a country.
guitaristwagner 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@guitaristwagner He didn't say the most powerful country, now did he?
Scorponizer 6 months ago