If any of you idiot truthers would just look at a picture of what happened when the towers collapsed ON building 7, you'd realize that the building PARTIALLY collapsed. About 50% or more of the face was destroyed from top to bottom. So, I guess by your notion, because 2% of the twin towers was still erect, it would be wrong to say that they collapsed, and THAT is also "the smoking gun". You friggin truthers are so fucking stupid.
@19nisey69 Did you see the other video of the free fall ? check the study of the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth for a more complete and mind blowing explanation.
Listen the attacks on the first trade 1 and 2 were real one of those schools they were talking I was going to at the time I was in 4th grade down the block from tower 7 saw all of it it collapsed like there was a giant hand pushing down on it.
The Germans blow up their own congress building and blame Jews and gypsys to start a war and exterminate people of specific qualities. Sound familiar? The Americans do this and invade Iraq and Afghanistan.
@CrystallLink i watched this live. i figured out the discrepency in real time....i watched this whole thing happen without any lens. the whole thing was plotted. once i saw that discrepency played out live everything after that fell into place...timeline of information coming out, government press releases, statements about culpability. it was entirely orchestrated. i knew it bullshit straight away. not many with that perspective, but thats what makes all this so clear to me
hahaha the lady reporter says its still burning, the anchor seemed confused on what was happening, besides ill reiterate what the point of this video was; the U.S Govt set up an inside job to murder 3,000 of its civilians and the 1 person the told about their master plan...was the british broadcasting channel, smh "truthers" are idiots
@OrloTheM3D1C you are decieved, and the ironic thing is you actually believe truthers are idiots.911 is so obviously
a lie, that is if you allow yourself to see the facts for yourself. forget arguing, cultivate some curiosity now or live in the big world of mass media lies. we have all been decieved, there's no shame in it, wake up time!
The "So called Jew-ish of Isreal" are only Jew-ish. THEY ARE NOT THE JEW! It were the Jew-ish who sold the Hebrews into slavery. The DNA evidence is all there. The Jew-ish had no idea the Science of DNA Testing would be coming. The Zionist are not Jew nor Hebrew, and DNA Testing proves it so. The people in Israel are nothing more than Khazars/Scythia/Turks/Pharisees. The European Church and USA has been fooled. Hitler was right about the Zionist and the Bankers! 9/11 = 100% Inside Job.
Were there just too many coicidences of.(God forbid)...perhaps someone else being involved that day?besides a few guys with box cutters , how ridiculous is that? a buisness man and a briefcase couldve taken out at least one guy with a 1 inch blade? an old lady and a heavy hand bag with a couple of passengers help couldve held a few of those small mideasterners, that was the story released by the corporate media, like they were there,.. a reputable source indeed?? Blg 7 just Fell down?nonsense
@GrooveDoctor77 so your disputing that grown men couldnt get up from their seats push a stewardess out of the way break into a cockpit and murder the completly unaware pilots....NOBODY KNEW what was going on!!! and WTC 7 collapsed cause it was on fire for HOURS; the infrastructure weakend drastically and she collapsed. IT IS AS SIMPLE AS THAT!
@GrooveDoctor77 oh so its still too hard for you to comprehend, because when your sitting in 1st class you dont rest or slept or nothing your hyper vigilant to your surrounds the entire flight just waiting for someone to stand up and move toward the bathroom and when they do oh man are you completly prepared to jump into action smh i dont know why you continue to stay ignorant
The building is still standing and this reptillian ball licker is saying it fell down. May she burn in hell for all eternity. No mercy. Just burn in hell.
Something I've noticed. Your 2nd amendment rights enable/allow you to wound or kill 30000 of your 'fellow americans' every year. It suggests you are a greater danger to yourselves than any militant Arab. You are a violent culture, spreading your idea of democracy thru violent means.
Long live the 2nd amendment. May all Americans, young and old bare arms, very quickly, and with free bullets and funerals.
One of the strange things was that after she said bldg 7 had collapsed (& it still standing behind her) was the satelite feed to the BBC newsroom in the UK mysteriously lost connection. They knew if they kept the live feed on that within a few minutes people would see the collapse, so they used the ole "we lost transmission" trick. Worked out good for'm, after they'd been on air all day until about time for the collapse. IDO, but it's still questionable, & they ain't sayn nothing. Peace2All
Ppl are missing the point that it was reported before it happened...which means it was planned, aswell as the murders of thousands of ppl in the WTC. Reporting a building collapse before it happens is an error alright....a cover up error. Lol, sheep of America.
@NicVirtue The nuclear reactors that are on fire in Japan - so far they haven't had a nuclear meltdown but it could happen as the fires get worse. If the fires were getting worse and a news agency got a report that a meltdown had started -but in fact the meltdown didn't start until about an hour later- would you be going 'HOW DID THEY KNOW?????? WHO TOLD THEM??? They must have had foreknowledge!!! It means it was planned!!! The reporter needs to be brought in for questioning!!!!!!
@cwlldoran That would be relevant if Building 7 was thousands of miles away >.> Would you be reporting a building collapsed even though its right behind you? Lol c'mon now. Im not even gonna argue it further, cause if 9/11 isnt even open for investigation, then that itsef means there hiding somthing.
@NicVirtue First of all, there is not way to tell what time this was reported at. Second, they could be playing a video behind her, she even pointed out the building. How do you know the video was not edited? Maybe they don't have footage of it actually falling and are using footage of it burning.
Do you know how many people it would take to cover something up like this? All of the international and national news organizations, the WHOLE Bush Admin., EVERY congressman & senator, to name a few
LMAO. Let me guess....they are being controlled by the Illuminati. God you people are fucking stupid. Go college, get a real fucking job and stop trying to spice up your life with stupid conspiracy theories.
Ok, just watched the video. A big part of building 7 collapsed before the main section, that is the noise before the main collapse.
But it asks the bigger question, if it was a secret that it was due to collapse, why was everyone asked to clear out because it was due to collapse?
You speak of questions, no alternative theory is presented. CT logic is always based on working backwards from apparent holes. Ask what questions you could ask if they ever presented their own theory.
Building 7 was most likely the target for Flight 93. It makes sense..why would it travel all the way to DC (whitehouse) from Newark? NY is closer. Building 7 was rigged like the towers and was a significant target housing the CIA, DOD, IRS, SEC, US secret service..
Studying architecture and reviewing 9/11, hundreds of times, buildings don't fall down at the same time especially when planes hit, nobody especially a reporter can say a building will collapse, there were in fact no fire crews and the guy who owned the building took about a billion dollar insurance policy briefly before 9/11 and in an interview said that they were pulling the building then corrected by saying pull the fire crew out, pulling a building is slang for demolishing a building
You guys are fucking idiots. This video if anything proves not a conspiracy but the fact that the building was clearly due to collapse and therefore did not have secret explosives.
Are you guys suggesting the Bush hating BBC were in on it? Morons, the lot of you.
Of course she was saying it had collapsed you moronic cunt. Which as I point out means one of two things.
A: It was so clearly expected to collapse and in the confusion of the day and in a rush to say fresh things, the BBC announced it HAD collapsed. Which was a mistake.
or
B: The BBC as an organisation were primed with the story because they were complicit in murder.
This is insanity (controlled demolition). FFS how stupid could one be?
@OneBigRetard you would make an excellent douchenozzle - two planes crashed into the twin towers and nobody knew that THEY were going to come down before it happened, so how could anyone foresee building 7, which wasn't directly hit, coming down, you giant colostomy bag? by his own (after the fact) admission, the world later found out that Larry Silverstein had building 7 "pulled" and saw that it came down with conspicuous similarity to both the twin towers, let's consider B, just for fun;)
1: Some people did think the towers would come down. Besides, different buildings.
2: Building 7 was creaking and bulging. Watch this and then see what a fool you are:/watch?v=zZrlNw-31R8
Are they all in on????
3: 'Pull the building'. Joker. Yes, pull the fire crews out because it was obviously going to collapse. Either that or you are saying the firechief was in on it and willing to murder hundreds of his own guys. Say it to his face.
It got damaged by falling building parts and burned massively, due to its unique design it started to creak and groan as witnessed by hundreds. Then as predicted by witnesses it gave way at a key point then collapsed.
That is a simple and plausible explanation. Instead idiots claim some unknown people rigged it with explosives that were never seen or heard to demolished it. The reason given is some total bullshit about removing evidence where a paper shredder would have done fine.
@OneBigRetard I'm not a conspiracy theorist but things are now coming out of the woodwork that's got a lot of people asking questions. What do you think of this site building what.org and this video: 9/11: Sound Evidence for WTC 7 Explosions and NIST Cover Up.
Well this video certainly does not raise any interesting questions at all. It means the (A) or (B) I expressed below. That is not interesting, it means nothing. I shall check out your links now and reply. But anything with 'NIST cover-up' makes me shudder. The world really doesn't work like that, people cannot keep secrets and I don't like accusing NIST of complicity n murder.
People that think the world works that way have never really lived in it.
@OneBigRetard such vitriol from a mental midget is to be expected. you have chosen your name well, one massive retard. both the correspondent and the anchor are speaking about the collapse of building 7 in the PAST TENSE. refer to 1:37. were you watching the same video as the rest of us
@OneBigRetard such vitriol from a mental midget is to be expected. you have chosen your name well, one massive retard. both the correspondent and the anchor are speaking about the collapse of building 7 in the PAST TENSE. refer to 1:37. were you watching the same video as the rest of us?
A. The media companies were in on the mass murder but have never leaked it. or
B. It was clearly heading for collapse and in the confusion of the day and the rush to put out fresh news the message that it was due to collapsed was confused with the incorrect report that it had collapsed.
Anyone that thinks (A) is the most likely is fucked in the head.
@OneBigRetard I doubt that anyone in the media would assume that building 7 was "headed for collapse" It had very very little visible damage. The media so often gets their "news" from controlled leaks. Why would you imagine cnn had pictures of bin laden up within minutes of the attack?
"t had very very little visible damage." Well that is just bollocks and proves you can't even be fucked to look stuff up. Building 7 was heading for collapse according to many many people, their statements are easily found. So that answers that problem. Stop being so lazy.
As for OBL, his face was up because it was obvious who did it. John O'Neil was reported to have said it was OBL in a phone call moments after the first plane hit. Read a little about OBL and realise.
@OneBigRetard All the physics professors and demolitionists who say without a doubt that it was controlled demolition are all morons. What the hell would they know about buildings and science.
Please Dispute this: Only explosives can instantaneously remove 8 stories allowing the upper structure to accelerate downwards in free fall. The absolute free fall of Building 7 over a period of 2.25 seconds is by itself overwhelming evidence that explosives were used to bring down the building.
Your appeal to authority is misplaced. I would bet a lot that lining up all the physics profs and demo guys in the world almost all would reject the controlled demo bullshit.
Why 'only explosives'. Can you prove that?
Look, I have no problems with the explanation provided so I don't need your grand conspiracy nonsense. Instead of asking what about the timings etc. ask some questions about a controlled demo. It has far more holes as a theory.
If you can answer this simple question without making me laugh at a far-fetched answer then we can start talking.
How come if it was not going to collapse due to the official reasons, why did all those people near and around building 7 say the building was ready to collapse any second???? Was it merely coincidence that a building packed with explosives also happened to creak and crack and convince people nearby it was going to go down?
@OneBigRetard yea im sure everyone around building 7 have been around collapsed buildings before, because creaking and cracking are sure signs of collapse, I bet you creak and crack when you get out of bed, and i think your still able to stand. Anyone who doesn't know by now that we did this to give the UN a good reason to rape the middle east for oil is dumber than shiz
It is not hearsay (one word). It was recorded and I have seen the footage. So are you saying nobody said it was probably going to collapse? If yes, try this: watch?v=zZrlNw-31R8 (start one minute in and you'll see)
If no, then you are saying it was coincidence.
"because of jet fuel melting the support beams"
Nobody has ever ever said fuel 'melted' beams. Strawman.
A plane didn't hit 7.
"looks rather similar"
It also looks identical to what the official explanation describes
@OneBigRetard Ok i will admit i was not talking about building 7 at all, i didn't even watch this video because i dont care about 9/11 in the least. But if you believe that debry from a different building collapsing next to it caused so much structural damage and a fire, that wasn't even jet fuel, weakened a building as important as it was supposed to be to the point of collapse is a joke. The government would have hung the architects and builders.
Your last post doesn't make sense. One of the biggest buildings in the world fell apart next to it. Huge chucks of it at hight speed fell through 7. What are the chances that that and the massive fires caused a collapse and that all the people writing the reports weren't in on a massive conspiracy? That actually their engineering explanation is closer to the truth than the nonsense from truthers?
No architect should've been expected to plan for that eventuality.
@OneBigRetard Architects design building like this to withstand the worst scenarios, and with all the money that would be put into a building like this I promise you every situation was thought of. Your not going to hear the truth thru mainstream media, because if everyone knew and believed the truth the U.S. government and all the deep pockets who run the U.S. would fall faster than the building itself.
No building like that is designed to withstand massive fires WITH NO FIREFIGHTERS. Let alone the damage from a falling building. No one would design for WTC 1&2 falling into it. Why? Because why bother, if the '93 bomb and caused the building to topple then any underneath it was screwed, no designing would help.
"Architects design building like this to withstand the worst scenarios". Really? Nuclear bombs? Some things are not designed for.
To be honest you seem very naive. There are standards to adhere to. By-laws and building codes. Commercial enterprises have to stick to these or risk the law. Now they don't want to do more than the minimum by nature as it costs money. Nobody when building this just threw unlimited money and said 'make it indestructible to everything'.
@OneBigRetard Buildings like this are designed to withstand the worst natural disasters, much worse than a few falling rocks. This building is a giant steel beam structure, NOT going to be hurt by just fire, and for the debry the north tower would have had to fall on top of it. Still then most of the building would still stand. I can't believe your saying im naive when you believe everything you hear that doesn't go against what most sheep are made to believe.
@xxchromewolf Nearly 3000 people, husbands, wifes, fathers, mothers, and children, DIED on that day. THREE THOUSAND. And all people care about is "OMG! the government totally did this!! omg omg". Are you fucking serious? I suppose you also believe the moon landing is fake, and Obama is actually Osama. People are so pathetic.
@SBulletproof 3 million iraqis are killed since US illegal invasion. THREE MILLION. why makes u yanks so superior to anyone else? ur government wanted to start a war so they staged a terrorist attack killing thier own ppl. ur government are fukin insane with power and i pity u ppl for being so painfully naive
@xxchromewolf OOooo yea thats right fire doesnt hurt steel, Noooooo. 1st of all every truther fails to do ac tual research, you freaks look at conspiracy web sights and read what a self proclaimed "expert" has to say in fields he has no authority in, then you take his word for fact. the truth is steel does weaken by 50% when exposed to fire above 1200 degrees and the builds were exposed to fires pushing 2000 degrees for hours; over time the interal structure weakend and they collapsed.
@OneBigRetard, Building 7 was not built to collapse from bullshit claims of debris. Even the twin tower collapse is absolutely stupid. They were built to take multiple hits from planes. What about the steel that was turned in to butter. DO YOU DISPUTE the FACT THAT STEEL CANNOT MELT FROM JET FUEL. Doesn't bother you that the most guarded building in the world gets hit by a commercial plane. Are you in that much denial? Bush in sitting in a public school and yet some useless towers r hit.
Yes, it was a simple screw-up. Everyone knew the building was going to collapse and this reporter thought it already had. Big deal.
There were lots of reporting errors that day. There were reports of bombs in the U.S. Capitol, bombs in the NY Stock Exchange, bombs in the United Nations complex. There was a report of a guy who "rode" the collapse of one of the towers all the way to the ground and then walked away. All were errors arising from the chaos and confusion of that day.
@buddyfreakinhoIIy "A simple screw-up" - Oh yes! - Just like we all know the world is as flat as a plate, the Moon is made of Swiss cheese and the USA is actually a gigantic pickled cucumber to accompany them! We ALL knoiw that, don't we? It's a KNOWN FACT, FOR GOODNESS SAKE! hehehehe!
can anyone still trust the bbc or any mainstream media any more ; answer is no!! unless your a fucking moron that is. the walls of Jericho have fallen. vive la revolution, qu'on leur coupe la tete.
this can only be made in the UK, its british humour on par with Monty Python's flying Circus. EPIC! I cant stop laughing everytime i watch this lady "as you can see behind me..." LOL yes we actually can see it! HAHAHA 16t of history in your face - and boom! and now for something completely different… LOL
As you can see I'm from England, I'm looking right at the standing WTC 7 and I got word that it has collapsed. Never heard of the Salomon Building before this but someone reported to us that it has indeed collapsed. Reporting a collapse before it has collapsed, the wall of the Pentagon was INTACT with NO CRASHED PLANE visible and finally no plane seen in Pennsylvania either?! This has got to be the worst fuck up in American history.
@TheJokerWolf Jesus Christ, listen to yourself, you're so damn hostile to someone you don't know just because I don't think like you, if anything, you're the one who's deluded, and you type like a high school dropout. Unlike you, I'm a realist, and also not a complete dumbass, not only that, but I've studied controlled demotions to a great extent to realize that this is the FARTHEST thing from a Controlled demo. I wish I could go into more detail, but youtube limits our comments.
The BBC reported that it came down 23 minutes before it actually did! The transmission conveniently gets cut moments before the building does "collapse".
Does it really matter if it is green screen( which I doubt) if this was aired 23 minutes before the building collapsed?
@CptCool2 Why would they go through trouble green-screening the WTC still standing when they just got a report that it collapsed? LMFAO
Thats like saying "Clearly the statue of liberty has collapsed but dont worry, we will set up our green-screen in order to make it look like it's still standing." But anyway watch my video, Fox also reported it collapsed before it collapsed.
has anyone thought that perhaps she's standing in front of a green screen? And that perhaps "stock" footage is being run behind her? hmmm... Not that a BBC reporter couldn't of been in NY the day of the attacks but she could be in Britain for all you know!
The UK and US gov. are in on this shit no doubt. London bombings and 9/11 both had mock exercises going on. What are the odds? Along with insider trading on put options of United and American Airlines. Don't forget about Operation Northwoods. Makes me fucking sick.
This video can very well be edited to portray them acting like wtc7 collapsed even though it's still standing behind her. She never actually says the name of the building she's talking about. I say fake shit. Even though 9/11 was of course an inside job. Round of applause for the illuminati ^^
OBL is dead anyway. He has been for years. We can land on the moon, but we can't find a dude that lives in a cave? Oh yeah, we never landed on the moon. Doh! OBL was on dialysis (sp) in August 2001, and we flew out his family on 911 during the nationwide plane grounding. Look it up.
OBL is dead anyway. He has been for years. We can land on the moon, but we can't find a dude that lives in a cave? Oh yeah, we never landed on the moon. Doh! OBL was on dialysis (sp) in August 2001, and we flew out his family on 911 during the nationwide plane grounding. Look it up.
Your government hired Bin laden to distract others while the C.I.A secretly does it's dirty work in America. Every time something blows it's blamed on Muslims and our religion. But Laden was hired to make Islam look bad.
It takes weeks of planning and setting up explosives to bring a building down in a controlled manner....Is there anyone who noticed any construction or construction workers in the building before this event....No way they could have set up a controlled explosion in one day..
Where's the footage where we SEE it go down in the background while she's talking? I've seen it, I know it exists. But I didn't DL it when I saw it. (Sound of self repeatedly & viciously kicking self is nuts.)
They received info from Reuters saying WTC7 had collapsed.
Unfortunately, with all the footage/reports shifting around that day, someone at Reuters had mistakenly taken an official saying WTC7 was "going to collapse" and reported it as "had collapsed"
In this case, this isn't a conspiracy, just a journalistic blunder.
@Cliffjumper24 assuming this is blunder it would show just how un journalistic mainstream news is. in conclusion don't buy the Brie until you taste it.
A bit off topic but did you know that during the Falklands war in 1982 the bbc world service announced to the world that 2para were making final preparations to attack goose green an hour or so before they actualy did attack it.........MUPPETS!
BBC Reported Building 7 Had Collapsed 20 Minutes Before It Fell
Who told the BBC that the building was going to collapse before it did
BBC News correspondent Jane Standley reports that the Salomon Brothers' Building (WTC 7) has collapsed, unaware that the intact building is clearly visible behind her
I've been looking into this footage. The rational explanation is that she is standing in front of a greenscreen and delayed footage is put behind her. It sure looks keyed and feathered slightly.. the best thing to do would ask the people from the BBC who did it... if anyone can prove me wrong I'm all ears.
@yarco8000 Thanks for your reply. Good question - my answer would be.. prove that it was broadcast 20 mins before it happened. Can you? I looked into what the head of BBC world said about it "Well it was a mistake, no conspiracy" blah blah.. yes - something was amiss, yet so was the truthers retaliation. You see I'd say that was irrelevant and instead ask the lady in this video if she was in front of WTC7 or bluescreen at the time of this broadcast, as according to the BBC, she WAS in New York.
@zangief definitely not a green screen. There wouldn't be a window frame or door where you can see the image on either side. Also they wouldn't have a mirror on the left side. She is definitely looking out of some building a couple blocks away.
Ok, so any logical explanations as to why conspirators would have a need to tip off the media? (remember I said logical)
Tipping the media off would only mean thousands more people know about the conspiracy and needlessly because they would have reported it anyway when it happened.
I wonder if nwo theorists are secretly wannabe world dominators but are held back by their wacky ideas like alerting everyone to their plans before they do it. lol
FOX robot Jeffrey Scott Shapiro now makes a desperate attempt to explain that 7 was rigged for demolition and that there's nothing strange about it. Um, is that why namely a CD rigging has been denied through all these years from Silverstien and his fellow debunkers? DID "pull it" really mean pull out the fire men, who was already out, now? HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!
prisonplanet. com/bombshell-silverstein-wanted-to-demolish-building-7-on-911. html
Any event as massive as 9/11 is going to throw up loads of circumstantial evidence, like a BBC reporter getting the building address wrong. The 9/11 death toll is irrelevant compared to Bush's actual crimes, unless you think white office workers are worth more than Iraqis or soldiers. Bush's actual crimes have been proven - whereas these allegations are absurd. - stop being Bush's best friend, and please stop preventing us from bringing his actual crimes home to him.
@sweepingreaper4 I completly agree w/ u. if the brit government and the US worked together maybe the governments are trying to seize power and make the world a dictatorship. Who the hell knows if the templars had anything to do w/ this. By the way Bush was a templar
i watched this in england at the time. knowing what i know now, this fourth reich mass murder has such a sloppy conspiracy that it WASN"T responsible, around it, that arrests and prosecutions are the only sane conclusion. the fact that every cowardly bastard who refuses to blow the whistle on the mass murderers, keeps them walking, is ridiculous. they have all the guns. they hold all the cards.
Yes, because new organizations have NEVER, EVER made mistakes or reported things incorrectly.
Yes, because if the BBC news people were in on this, they wouldn't even digitally edit the building out of the picture.
And of course, the english reporters know the name and appearance of every single building in New York, so the building still standing was a conspiracy mistake rather than an honest error.
the news reader had just been fed the story direct from the conspirator's mouths. "collapsed because it had been weakened"? How did they know for sure at that stage? Surely it would be more logical to assume that it had been attacked? Would you agree?
The media plants the seed and the majority of the public swallow it. If the news said it, it must be true.
this video was doctored...the clips of her don't match the guys clips...she doesn't really answer his questions...she mentions nothing of wtc7 in her talk, the print under he name is also doctored in....but good video and well made...it made me think a little.
WTC7 - the third building that collapsed on 911 that most people do not know about, not the twin towers. Both of the towers had been completely demolished by explosives at this point.
Hush hush thats classified, the largest military industrial complex on earth, that spends more money on technology for killing people than all the other countries on earth combined is completely squakey clean. Just call me numbnutts xD
If any of you idiot truthers would just look at a picture of what happened when the towers collapsed ON building 7, you'd realize that the building PARTIALLY collapsed. About 50% or more of the face was destroyed from top to bottom. So, I guess by your notion, because 2% of the twin towers was still erect, it would be wrong to say that they collapsed, and THAT is also "the smoking gun". You friggin truthers are so fucking stupid.
19nisey69 1 month ago
@19nisey69 Did you see the other video of the free fall ? check the study of the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth for a more complete and mind blowing explanation.
agustinbs 1 week ago
Listen the attacks on the first trade 1 and 2 were real one of those schools they were talking I was going to at the time I was in 4th grade down the block from tower 7 saw all of it it collapsed like there was a giant hand pushing down on it.
Koldshot 1 month ago
Demo job if ive ever seen one.
Stringyheads 1 month ago
@RudolfsEasyCooking the connection suddenly was cut so probably someone realised that is too early to talk about it...
rzabsko 2 months ago
Falls straight down?
superlativeOFgood 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Motherfucking white people are fucking evil
ThExKiDxCuDix 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ron paul 2012
0bamasmama 4 months ago
The Germans blow up their own congress building and blame Jews and gypsys to start a war and exterminate people of specific qualities. Sound familiar? The Americans do this and invade Iraq and Afghanistan.
MegaCrappyusername 4 months ago 4
Everything BBC spouts about 9/11 has little to no basis in fact or physics....
megamogx 5 months ago
I seen this on cbc
CrystallLink 5 months ago
@CrystallLink i watched this live. i figured out the discrepency in real time....i watched this whole thing happen without any lens. the whole thing was plotted. once i saw that discrepency played out live everything after that fell into place...timeline of information coming out, government press releases, statements about culpability. it was entirely orchestrated. i knew it bullshit straight away. not many with that perspective, but thats what makes all this so clear to me
runelord37 4 months ago
and i thought the muslims were the terrorists..
AronHallan 6 months ago
hahaha the lady reporter says its still burning, the anchor seemed confused on what was happening, besides ill reiterate what the point of this video was; the U.S Govt set up an inside job to murder 3,000 of its civilians and the 1 person the told about their master plan...was the british broadcasting channel, smh "truthers" are idiots
OrloTheM3D1C 7 months ago
@OrloTheM3D1C you are decieved, and the ironic thing is you actually believe truthers are idiots.911 is so obviously
a lie, that is if you allow yourself to see the facts for yourself. forget arguing, cultivate some curiosity now or live in the big world of mass media lies. we have all been decieved, there's no shame in it, wake up time!
ddarkshark 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The "So called Jew-ish of Isreal" are only Jew-ish. THEY ARE NOT THE JEW! It were the Jew-ish who sold the Hebrews into slavery. The DNA evidence is all there. The Jew-ish had no idea the Science of DNA Testing would be coming. The Zionist are not Jew nor Hebrew, and DNA Testing proves it so. The people in Israel are nothing more than Khazars/Scythia/Turks/Pharisees. The European Church and USA has been fooled. Hitler was right about the Zionist and the Bankers! 9/11 = 100% Inside Job.
Born2Flesh 8 months ago
Were there just too many coicidences of.(God forbid)...perhaps someone else being involved that day?besides a few guys with box cutters , how ridiculous is that? a buisness man and a briefcase couldve taken out at least one guy with a 1 inch blade? an old lady and a heavy hand bag with a couple of passengers help couldve held a few of those small mideasterners, that was the story released by the corporate media, like they were there,.. a reputable source indeed?? Blg 7 just Fell down?nonsense
GrooveDoctor77 8 months ago 11
@GrooveDoctor77 so your disputing that grown men couldnt get up from their seats push a stewardess out of the way break into a cockpit and murder the completly unaware pilots....NOBODY KNEW what was going on!!! and WTC 7 collapsed cause it was on fire for HOURS; the infrastructure weakend drastically and she collapsed. IT IS AS SIMPLE AS THAT!
OrloTheM3D1C 7 months ago
@OrloTheM3D1C yea right ,,,. still nonsense
GrooveDoctor77 7 months ago
@GrooveDoctor77 oh so its still too hard for you to comprehend, because when your sitting in 1st class you dont rest or slept or nothing your hyper vigilant to your surrounds the entire flight just waiting for someone to stand up and move toward the bathroom and when they do oh man are you completly prepared to jump into action smh i dont know why you continue to stay ignorant
OrloTheM3D1C 7 months ago
@OrloTheM3D1 ignorant ? youve been watching CNN too long
GrooveDoctor77 7 months ago
The building is still standing and this reptillian ball licker is saying it fell down. May she burn in hell for all eternity. No mercy. Just burn in hell.
Daddyo930 9 months ago
"A nation of sheep begets a government of wolves." Edward R. Murrow.
dabeesta17 9 months ago
Dearest Americans.
Something I've noticed. Your 2nd amendment rights enable/allow you to wound or kill 30000 of your 'fellow americans' every year. It suggests you are a greater danger to yourselves than any militant Arab. You are a violent culture, spreading your idea of democracy thru violent means.
Long live the 2nd amendment. May all Americans, young and old bare arms, very quickly, and with free bullets and funerals.
modelparent 9 months ago
"Human acquiescence is as easily obtained by terror, as by temptation."
Pinhead - Hellraiser 4
9/11 was an inside job
tropophyte 9 months ago
20 minutes is 20 minutes. Was she psychic?
bzzb0123 9 months ago
guy's stop feeding the troll (OneBigRetard)
If you want to learn more about the 9/11 media hoax I recommend checking out:
septemberclues.info
SteveFusionX 10 months ago
One of the strange things was that after she said bldg 7 had collapsed (& it still standing behind her) was the satelite feed to the BBC newsroom in the UK mysteriously lost connection. They knew if they kept the live feed on that within a few minutes people would see the collapse, so they used the ole "we lost transmission" trick. Worked out good for'm, after they'd been on air all day until about time for the collapse. IDO, but it's still questionable, & they ain't sayn nothing. Peace2All
JimmyCarol100 10 months ago
Ppl are missing the point that it was reported before it happened...which means it was planned, aswell as the murders of thousands of ppl in the WTC. Reporting a building collapse before it happens is an error alright....a cover up error. Lol, sheep of America.
NicVirtue 10 months ago
@NicVirtue The nuclear reactors that are on fire in Japan - so far they haven't had a nuclear meltdown but it could happen as the fires get worse. If the fires were getting worse and a news agency got a report that a meltdown had started -but in fact the meltdown didn't start until about an hour later- would you be going 'HOW DID THEY KNOW?????? WHO TOLD THEM??? They must have had foreknowledge!!! It means it was planned!!! The reporter needs to be brought in for questioning!!!!!!
cwlldoran 10 months ago
@cwlldoran That would be relevant if Building 7 was thousands of miles away >.> Would you be reporting a building collapsed even though its right behind you? Lol c'mon now. Im not even gonna argue it further, cause if 9/11 isnt even open for investigation, then that itsef means there hiding somthing.
NicVirtue 10 months ago
@NicVirtue First of all, there is not way to tell what time this was reported at. Second, they could be playing a video behind her, she even pointed out the building. How do you know the video was not edited? Maybe they don't have footage of it actually falling and are using footage of it burning.
Do you know how many people it would take to cover something up like this? All of the international and national news organizations, the WHOLE Bush Admin., EVERY congressman & senator, to name a few
adambear8888 10 months ago
LMAO. Let me guess....they are being controlled by the Illuminati. God you people are fucking stupid. Go college, get a real fucking job and stop trying to spice up your life with stupid conspiracy theories.
theUSER101 10 months ago
@theUSER101 i will go college
KanapkaDrobakha 10 months ago
when does she say that wtc 7 collapse?
pokemonmasterBryan 11 months ago
Ok, just watched the video. A big part of building 7 collapsed before the main section, that is the noise before the main collapse.
But it asks the bigger question, if it was a secret that it was due to collapse, why was everyone asked to clear out because it was due to collapse?
You speak of questions, no alternative theory is presented. CT logic is always based on working backwards from apparent holes. Ask what questions you could ask if they ever presented their own theory.
OneBigRetard 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Building 7 was most likely the target for Flight 93. It makes sense..why would it travel all the way to DC (whitehouse) from Newark? NY is closer. Building 7 was rigged like the towers and was a significant target housing the CIA, DOD, IRS, SEC, US secret service..
demigodlike 11 months ago
Also the news reporter was only doing her job, it's the person who gave her the script that made the mistake, they obviously gave it to her too early
EmmaTrixLaStringe 11 months ago
@EmmaTrixLaStringe makes total sense that someone would make the mistake about a whether a building is collapsed or standing still, are you retarded?
DREwestcoast 7 months ago
Studying architecture and reviewing 9/11, hundreds of times, buildings don't fall down at the same time especially when planes hit, nobody especially a reporter can say a building will collapse, there were in fact no fire crews and the guy who owned the building took about a billion dollar insurance policy briefly before 9/11 and in an interview said that they were pulling the building then corrected by saying pull the fire crew out, pulling a building is slang for demolishing a building
EmmaTrixLaStringe 11 months ago
You guys are fucking idiots. This video if anything proves not a conspiracy but the fact that the building was clearly due to collapse and therefore did not have secret explosives.
Are you guys suggesting the Bush hating BBC were in on it? Morons, the lot of you.
She says 'DETAILS ARE SKETCHY."
OneBigRetard 1 year ago
Comment removed
noodoo19 11 months ago
@noodoo19
Of course she was saying it had collapsed you moronic cunt. Which as I point out means one of two things.
A: It was so clearly expected to collapse and in the confusion of the day and in a rush to say fresh things, the BBC announced it HAD collapsed. Which was a mistake.
or
B: The BBC as an organisation were primed with the story because they were complicit in murder.
This is insanity (controlled demolition). FFS how stupid could one be?
OneBigRetard 11 months ago
@OneBigRetard you would make an excellent douchenozzle - two planes crashed into the twin towers and nobody knew that THEY were going to come down before it happened, so how could anyone foresee building 7, which wasn't directly hit, coming down, you giant colostomy bag? by his own (after the fact) admission, the world later found out that Larry Silverstein had building 7 "pulled" and saw that it came down with conspicuous similarity to both the twin towers, let's consider B, just for fun;)
noodoo19 11 months ago
@noodoo19
Stop embarrassing yourself.
1: Some people did think the towers would come down. Besides, different buildings.
2: Building 7 was creaking and bulging. Watch this and then see what a fool you are:/watch?v=zZrlNw-31R8
Are they all in on????
3: 'Pull the building'. Joker. Yes, pull the fire crews out because it was obviously going to collapse. Either that or you are saying the firechief was in on it and willing to murder hundreds of his own guys. Say it to his face.
OneBigRetard 11 months ago
@OneBigRetard 9/11 Truth: What Happened to Building 7
kiatiming101 11 months ago
@kiatiming101
It got damaged by falling building parts and burned massively, due to its unique design it started to creak and groan as witnessed by hundreds. Then as predicted by witnesses it gave way at a key point then collapsed.
That is a simple and plausible explanation. Instead idiots claim some unknown people rigged it with explosives that were never seen or heard to demolished it. The reason given is some total bullshit about removing evidence where a paper shredder would have done fine.
OneBigRetard 11 months ago
@OneBigRetard I'm not a conspiracy theorist but things are now coming out of the woodwork that's got a lot of people asking questions. What do you think of this site building what.org and this video: 9/11: Sound Evidence for WTC 7 Explosions and NIST Cover Up.
kiatiming101 11 months ago
@kiatiming101
Well this video certainly does not raise any interesting questions at all. It means the (A) or (B) I expressed below. That is not interesting, it means nothing. I shall check out your links now and reply. But anything with 'NIST cover-up' makes me shudder. The world really doesn't work like that, people cannot keep secrets and I don't like accusing NIST of complicity n murder.
People that think the world works that way have never really lived in it.
OneBigRetard 11 months ago
@kiatiming101
/watch?v=rp1qH-pOcAQ
Watch this but notice how part of 7 collapses before the main part.
Fact is, the two main towers look nothing like a controlled demo, but they do look exactly like what was described by NIST. Go figure.
OneBigRetard 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@OneBigRetard such vitriol from a mental midget is to be expected. you have chosen your name well, one massive retard. both the correspondent and the anchor are speaking about the collapse of building 7 in the PAST TENSE. refer to 1:37. were you watching the same video as the rest of us
noodoo19 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@OneBigRetard such vitriol from a mental midget is to be expected. you have chosen your name well, one massive retard. both the correspondent and the anchor are speaking about the collapse of building 7 in the PAST TENSE. refer to 1:37. were you watching the same video as the rest of us?
noodoo19 11 months ago
@OneBigRetard FOX-5 Reports 9/11/01: WTC-7 Collapsed Before Actual Event
kiatiming101 11 months ago
@kiatiming101
Of course. What does that prove?
Either:
A. The media companies were in on the mass murder but have never leaked it. or
B. It was clearly heading for collapse and in the confusion of the day and the rush to put out fresh news the message that it was due to collapsed was confused with the incorrect report that it had collapsed.
Anyone that thinks (A) is the most likely is fucked in the head.
Hanlon's Razor applies here.
OneBigRetard 11 months ago
@OneBigRetard I doubt that anyone in the media would assume that building 7 was "headed for collapse" It had very very little visible damage. The media so often gets their "news" from controlled leaks. Why would you imagine cnn had pictures of bin laden up within minutes of the attack?
FieldMarshalB 11 months ago
@FieldMarshalB
"t had very very little visible damage." Well that is just bollocks and proves you can't even be fucked to look stuff up. Building 7 was heading for collapse according to many many people, their statements are easily found. So that answers that problem. Stop being so lazy.
As for OBL, his face was up because it was obvious who did it. John O'Neil was reported to have said it was OBL in a phone call moments after the first plane hit. Read a little about OBL and realise.
OneBigRetard 11 months ago
@OneBigRetard All the physics professors and demolitionists who say without a doubt that it was controlled demolition are all morons. What the hell would they know about buildings and science.
Please Dispute this: Only explosives can instantaneously remove 8 stories allowing the upper structure to accelerate downwards in free fall. The absolute free fall of Building 7 over a period of 2.25 seconds is by itself overwhelming evidence that explosives were used to bring down the building.
SortaExtremist 10 months ago
@SortaExtremist
1:
Your appeal to authority is misplaced. I would bet a lot that lining up all the physics profs and demo guys in the world almost all would reject the controlled demo bullshit.
Why 'only explosives'. Can you prove that?
Look, I have no problems with the explanation provided so I don't need your grand conspiracy nonsense. Instead of asking what about the timings etc. ask some questions about a controlled demo. It has far more holes as a theory.
OneBigRetard 10 months ago
@SortaExtremist
2:
If you can answer this simple question without making me laugh at a far-fetched answer then we can start talking.
How come if it was not going to collapse due to the official reasons, why did all those people near and around building 7 say the building was ready to collapse any second???? Was it merely coincidence that a building packed with explosives also happened to creak and crack and convince people nearby it was going to go down?
One hell of a coincidence dude.
OneBigRetard 10 months ago
@OneBigRetard yea im sure everyone around building 7 have been around collapsed buildings before, because creaking and cracking are sure signs of collapse, I bet you creak and crack when you get out of bed, and i think your still able to stand. Anyone who doesn't know by now that we did this to give the UN a good reason to rape the middle east for oil is dumber than shiz
xxchromewolf 10 months ago
@xxchromewolf
Sarcasm. Nice.
So it was coincidence then? Experienced firemen said the building would come down and to keep away. It then did.
So you reckon coincidence and explosives? or murdering firemen and explosives?
Either way you are crazy.
"Anyone who doesn't know by now that we did this to give the UN a good reason to rape the middle east for oil is dumber than shiz"
No evidence just this strange statement. Perhaps the fact that the UN didn't agree suggests this is bullshit.
OneBigRetard 10 months ago
Comment removed
xxchromewolf 10 months ago
@xxchromewolf
It is not hearsay (one word). It was recorded and I have seen the footage. So are you saying nobody said it was probably going to collapse? If yes, try this: watch?v=zZrlNw-31R8 (start one minute in and you'll see)
If no, then you are saying it was coincidence.
"because of jet fuel melting the support beams"
Nobody has ever ever said fuel 'melted' beams. Strawman.
A plane didn't hit 7.
"looks rather similar"
It also looks identical to what the official explanation describes
OneBigRetard 10 months ago
@OneBigRetard Ok i will admit i was not talking about building 7 at all, i didn't even watch this video because i dont care about 9/11 in the least. But if you believe that debry from a different building collapsing next to it caused so much structural damage and a fire, that wasn't even jet fuel, weakened a building as important as it was supposed to be to the point of collapse is a joke. The government would have hung the architects and builders.
xxchromewolf 10 months ago
@xxchromewolf
Your last post doesn't make sense. One of the biggest buildings in the world fell apart next to it. Huge chucks of it at hight speed fell through 7. What are the chances that that and the massive fires caused a collapse and that all the people writing the reports weren't in on a massive conspiracy? That actually their engineering explanation is closer to the truth than the nonsense from truthers?
No architect should've been expected to plan for that eventuality.
OneBigRetard 10 months ago
@OneBigRetard Architects design building like this to withstand the worst scenarios, and with all the money that would be put into a building like this I promise you every situation was thought of. Your not going to hear the truth thru mainstream media, because if everyone knew and believed the truth the U.S. government and all the deep pockets who run the U.S. would fall faster than the building itself.
xxchromewolf 10 months ago
@xxchromewolf
1:
'you promise me'.
Dude, you can't promise that. How would you know?
No building like that is designed to withstand massive fires WITH NO FIREFIGHTERS. Let alone the damage from a falling building. No one would design for WTC 1&2 falling into it. Why? Because why bother, if the '93 bomb and caused the building to topple then any underneath it was screwed, no designing would help.
OneBigRetard 10 months ago
@xxchromewolf
2:
"Architects design building like this to withstand the worst scenarios". Really? Nuclear bombs? Some things are not designed for.
To be honest you seem very naive. There are standards to adhere to. By-laws and building codes. Commercial enterprises have to stick to these or risk the law. Now they don't want to do more than the minimum by nature as it costs money. Nobody when building this just threw unlimited money and said 'make it indestructible to everything'.
OneBigRetard 10 months ago
@OneBigRetard Buildings like this are designed to withstand the worst natural disasters, much worse than a few falling rocks. This building is a giant steel beam structure, NOT going to be hurt by just fire, and for the debry the north tower would have had to fall on top of it. Still then most of the building would still stand. I can't believe your saying im naive when you believe everything you hear that doesn't go against what most sheep are made to believe.
xxchromewolf 10 months ago 19
@xxchromewolf Nearly 3000 people, husbands, wifes, fathers, mothers, and children, DIED on that day. THREE THOUSAND. And all people care about is "OMG! the government totally did this!! omg omg". Are you fucking serious? I suppose you also believe the moon landing is fake, and Obama is actually Osama. People are so pathetic.
SBulletproof 8 months ago
@SBulletproof so you dont care that the govournment killed those innocent people? FUCK YOU!
TheMoo1231 8 months ago
@TheMoo1231 I suggest you read the comment again.
SBulletproof 8 months ago
@SBulletproof ?
TheMoo1231 8 months ago
@SBulletproof 3 million iraqis are killed since US illegal invasion. THREE MILLION. why makes u yanks so superior to anyone else? ur government wanted to start a war so they staged a terrorist attack killing thier own ppl. ur government are fukin insane with power and i pity u ppl for being so painfully naive
beleive me, ur the pathetic one.
FuckDaMedia 7 months ago
@FuckDaMedia
I've been thinking.... and I have reached the final conclusion...
That you're retarded.
SBulletproof 7 months ago
@SBulletproof damn!! u got me, i lose. what u said just made total sense. what was i thinking!!?!!?!?!?!??
(wow.... u americans are something else......)
FuckDaMedia 7 months ago
@FuckDaMedia k
SBulletproof 7 months ago
@xxchromewolf OOooo yea thats right fire doesnt hurt steel, Noooooo. 1st of all every truther fails to do ac tual research, you freaks look at conspiracy web sights and read what a self proclaimed "expert" has to say in fields he has no authority in, then you take his word for fact. the truth is steel does weaken by 50% when exposed to fire above 1200 degrees and the builds were exposed to fires pushing 2000 degrees for hours; over time the interal structure weakend and they collapsed.
OrloTheM3D1C 7 months ago
@OneBigRetard, Building 7 was not built to collapse from bullshit claims of debris. Even the twin tower collapse is absolutely stupid. They were built to take multiple hits from planes. What about the steel that was turned in to butter. DO YOU DISPUTE the FACT THAT STEEL CANNOT MELT FROM JET FUEL. Doesn't bother you that the most guarded building in the world gets hit by a commercial plane. Are you in that much denial? Bush in sitting in a public school and yet some useless towers r hit.
SortaExtremist 10 months ago
Yes, it was a simple screw-up. Everyone knew the building was going to collapse and this reporter thought it already had. Big deal.
There were lots of reporting errors that day. There were reports of bombs in the U.S. Capitol, bombs in the NY Stock Exchange, bombs in the United Nations complex. There was a report of a guy who "rode" the collapse of one of the towers all the way to the ground and then walked away. All were errors arising from the chaos and confusion of that day.
buddyfreakinhoIIy 1 year ago
Your an IDIOT!!!!!
heineken2111 11 months ago
@buddyfreakinhoIIy "A simple screw-up" - Oh yes! - Just like we all know the world is as flat as a plate, the Moon is made of Swiss cheese and the USA is actually a gigantic pickled cucumber to accompany them! We ALL knoiw that, don't we? It's a KNOWN FACT, FOR GOODNESS SAKE! hehehehe!
CUERVOBRILLANTE 11 months ago
can anyone still trust the bbc or any mainstream media any more ; answer is no!! unless your a fucking moron that is. the walls of Jericho have fallen. vive la revolution, qu'on leur coupe la tete.
boosomentity 1 year ago
this can only be made in the UK, its british humour on par with Monty Python's flying Circus. EPIC! I cant stop laughing everytime i watch this lady "as you can see behind me..." LOL yes we actually can see it! HAHAHA 16t of history in your face - and boom! and now for something completely different… LOL
q1qeu 1 year ago
As you can see I'm from England, I'm looking right at the standing WTC 7 and I got word that it has collapsed. Never heard of the Salomon Building before this but someone reported to us that it has indeed collapsed. Reporting a collapse before it has collapsed, the wall of the Pentagon was INTACT with NO CRASHED PLANE visible and finally no plane seen in Pennsylvania either?! This has got to be the worst fuck up in American history.
Chaz2096 1 year ago
@TheJokerWolf Jesus Christ, listen to yourself, you're so damn hostile to someone you don't know just because I don't think like you, if anything, you're the one who's deluded, and you type like a high school dropout. Unlike you, I'm a realist, and also not a complete dumbass, not only that, but I've studied controlled demotions to a great extent to realize that this is the FARTHEST thing from a Controlled demo. I wish I could go into more detail, but youtube limits our comments.
CptCool2 1 year ago
Not greescreen, the light in her hair comes from the back and you can see the reflex of a window in the left and a frame in the right.
DMHR100 1 year ago
This is nuts! People dismiss this! This really is proof I believe
SecretActivator 1 year ago
The BBC reported that it came down 23 minutes before it actually did! The transmission conveniently gets cut moments before the building does "collapse".
Does it really matter if it is green screen( which I doubt) if this was aired 23 minutes before the building collapsed?
DanksterZone 1 year ago
Cont. Obviously greenscreened.
CptCool2 1 year ago
@CptCool2 Why would they go through trouble green-screening the WTC still standing when they just got a report that it collapsed? LMFAO
Thats like saying "Clearly the statue of liberty has collapsed but dont worry, we will set up our green-screen in order to make it look like it's still standing." But anyway watch my video, Fox also reported it collapsed before it collapsed.
Chaz2096 1 year ago
Looks like a poor attempt of them acting like they're actually there. You truthers are so adorable.
CptCool2 1 year ago
has anyone thought that perhaps she's standing in front of a green screen? And that perhaps "stock" footage is being run behind her? hmmm... Not that a BBC reporter couldn't of been in NY the day of the attacks but she could be in Britain for all you know!
darthbarker 1 year ago
@darthbarker good point... it actually does look like she's in front of a screen, look at the left side of the picture, it looks cut off.
It does say 'live" in "New York though"... not that the BBC couldn't lie about that, but you know.
god I just don't know what to think about those conspiracy theories XD I really hope they're all wrong to be honest
klutrusty 1 year ago
@klutrusty
Well, the most popular one about "Osama And the 19 Li'l al-Qaeda's" is wrong at least.
Thetan1974 1 year ago
The UK and US gov. are in on this shit no doubt. London bombings and 9/11 both had mock exercises going on. What are the odds? Along with insider trading on put options of United and American Airlines. Don't forget about Operation Northwoods. Makes me fucking sick.
DrugstoreCFH 1 year ago
@DrugstoreCFH god i know man its fucking crazy how shit like this happens. seriously I can't believe they would get away would something like this
YUGIOHbuyANDsell 1 year ago
BBC = THE MOST EPIC FAIL IN HISTORY
zackvanhalen 1 year ago
@zackvanhalen
LOL I remember watching this Live and thinking WTF..It has not collapsed..I CAN STILL SEE IT!!!
EPIC FAIL BBC
matsui2001 1 year ago
I was watching the BBC footage on the day and clearly heard them discussing that the Fire Dept was going to bring down building 7.
The beauty of building 7 is what was stored in it.
OwenHiggins 1 year ago
Are you trying to say that the WTC was announced that it collapsed but it actually hadn't yet.
covertatu 1 year ago
show me the proof this was 20 minutes early
gunners4life123 1 year ago
This video can very well be edited to portray them acting like wtc7 collapsed even though it's still standing behind her. She never actually says the name of the building she's talking about. I say fake shit. Even though 9/11 was of course an inside job. Round of applause for the illuminati ^^
damianlopeznyc 1 year ago
@damianlopeznyc ye but their talking about wtc7.the guy was talking about it and he goes to the lady and asks for more of the info on wtc7.
Deadlyliess 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Check Out The New Track On Our Page "911 Was An Inside Job"
PortlandCityPlayas 1 year ago
!!!!!!!!!! nuff said
Billywask 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
OBL is dead anyway. He has been for years. We can land on the moon, but we can't find a dude that lives in a cave? Oh yeah, we never landed on the moon. Doh! OBL was on dialysis (sp) in August 2001, and we flew out his family on 911 during the nationwide plane grounding. Look it up.
EleanorsHubby 1 year ago
OBL is dead anyway. He has been for years. We can land on the moon, but we can't find a dude that lives in a cave? Oh yeah, we never landed on the moon. Doh! OBL was on dialysis (sp) in August 2001, and we flew out his family on 911 during the nationwide plane grounding. Look it up.
EleanorsHubby 1 year ago
@EleanorsHubby apparently OBL just released a new video blaming the industrialized countries for global warming.. so i guess he is alive
skinnydiprog3r 1 year ago
Your government hired Bin laden to distract others while the C.I.A secretly does it's dirty work in America. Every time something blows it's blamed on Muslims and our religion. But Laden was hired to make Islam look bad.
Theboxer500 1 year ago
after we win the fight for the truth, we will have to fight to make people care.
mrbobobo262626 1 year ago
check out buildingwhat . org if you dont know building 7 decide for yourself dont listen 2 any1 else.
cocofrmlaois 1 year ago 7
this disgusts me.
mrcoolwhip1 1 year ago
@mrcoolwhip1 - Why does it disgust you?
Myrmecia 1 year ago
@Myrmecia The lives lost, for a lie of a reason. Only someone inhuman can kill as many people as they did that day. Thats what disgusts me.
mrcoolwhip1 1 year ago
Comment removed
hejhejhejhej287 1 year ago
BBC Bullshit=NWO=Illuminati cover-up"
Hendo1974 1 year ago
why was this all an inside job. im so confused
MrStephen99ful 1 year ago
@MrStephen99ful check out buildingwhat . org
cocofrmlaois 1 year ago
It takes weeks of planning and setting up explosives to bring a building down in a controlled manner....Is there anyone who noticed any construction or construction workers in the building before this event....No way they could have set up a controlled explosion in one day..
avionicswirenut 1 year ago
@avionicswirenut they shouldnt need to do it 1 day before the event,they had years ,n dont have to set the bombs up in one day neither...
borbalasophie 1 year ago
@avionicswirenut who said they did it in one day?
wii111593 1 year ago
Where's the footage where we SEE it go down in the background while she's talking? I've seen it, I know it exists. But I didn't DL it when I saw it. (Sound of self repeatedly & viciously kicking self is nuts.)
drreedindeed 1 year ago
hahaha damn. englands stupid
pattyboy424 1 year ago
i bet the bbc have no comment on this
UKimpact 1 year ago
@UKimpact They already have.
They received info from Reuters saying WTC7 had collapsed.
Unfortunately, with all the footage/reports shifting around that day, someone at Reuters had mistakenly taken an official saying WTC7 was "going to collapse" and reported it as "had collapsed"
In this case, this isn't a conspiracy, just a journalistic blunder.
Cliffjumper24 1 year ago
@Cliffjumper24 assuming this is blunder it would show just how un journalistic mainstream news is. in conclusion don't buy the Brie until you taste it.
boosomentity 1 year ago
A bit off topic but did you know that during the Falklands war in 1982 the bbc world service announced to the world that 2para were making final preparations to attack goose green an hour or so before they actualy did attack it.........MUPPETS!
Skyswinger 1 year ago
BBC Reported Building 7 Had Collapsed 20 Minutes Before It Fell
Who told the BBC that the building was going to collapse before it did
BBC News correspondent Jane Standley reports that the Salomon Brothers' Building (WTC 7) has collapsed, unaware that the intact building is clearly visible behind her
TRUTHBOXNEWS 1 year ago
clinton brought down building 7!!
snackmachines 1 year ago
Why the british say salomon brothers' building?
MarioCalimacho87 1 year ago
dumbidiots!!!
why the early reporting, maybe building 7 meant another building not the saloman building, explain this please
nucouche@yahoo.com
douglas
douglassmcann 1 year ago
I've been looking into this footage. The rational explanation is that she is standing in front of a greenscreen and delayed footage is put behind her. It sure looks keyed and feathered slightly.. the best thing to do would ask the people from the BBC who did it... if anyone can prove me wrong I'm all ears.
zangief 1 year ago
@zangief That's just completely irrelevent. How would it change the bbc's abilty to report something 20 minutes before it happened?
yarco8000 1 year ago
@yarco8000 Thanks for your reply. Good question - my answer would be.. prove that it was broadcast 20 mins before it happened. Can you? I looked into what the head of BBC world said about it "Well it was a mistake, no conspiracy" blah blah.. yes - something was amiss, yet so was the truthers retaliation. You see I'd say that was irrelevant and instead ask the lady in this video if she was in front of WTC7 or bluescreen at the time of this broadcast, as according to the BBC, she WAS in New York.
zangief 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@zangief
"prove that it was broadcast 20 mins before it happened. Can you?"
listen what she says and read the writings beneath her
TheMightyGuri 1 year ago
@zangief definitely not a green screen. There wouldn't be a window frame or door where you can see the image on either side. Also they wouldn't have a mirror on the left side. She is definitely looking out of some building a couple blocks away.
youtubular40 1 year ago
@zangief Simple mistake on the part of the BBC on a busy day.
Take a look at this link, and it might answer some of your questions.
watch?v=bZCO6eUslY4
Cliffjumper24 1 year ago
Ok, so any logical explanations as to why conspirators would have a need to tip off the media? (remember I said logical)
Tipping the media off would only mean thousands more people know about the conspiracy and needlessly because they would have reported it anyway when it happened.
I wonder if nwo theorists are secretly wannabe world dominators but are held back by their wacky ideas like alerting everyone to their plans before they do it. lol
frankovich213 1 year ago
are people so retarded there trying to say the bbc was in on the world trade centre attacks. People have to much time on there hands I swear
jonnyd89 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FOX robot Jeffrey Scott Shapiro now makes a desperate attempt to explain that 7 was rigged for demolition and that there's nothing strange about it. Um, is that why namely a CD rigging has been denied through all these years from Silverstien and his fellow debunkers? DID "pull it" really mean pull out the fire men, who was already out, now? HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!
prisonplanet. com/bombshell-silverstein-wanted-to-demolish-building-7-on-911. html
Thetan1974 1 year ago
Any event as massive as 9/11 is going to throw up loads of circumstantial evidence, like a BBC reporter getting the building address wrong. The 9/11 death toll is irrelevant compared to Bush's actual crimes, unless you think white office workers are worth more than Iraqis or soldiers. Bush's actual crimes have been proven - whereas these allegations are absurd. - stop being Bush's best friend, and please stop preventing us from bringing his actual crimes home to him.
joveismad 1 year ago
@sweepingreaper4 I completly agree w/ u. if the brit government and the US worked together maybe the governments are trying to seize power and make the world a dictatorship. Who the hell knows if the templars had anything to do w/ this. By the way Bush was a templar
deadlychurros 1 year ago
i watched this in england at the time. knowing what i know now, this fourth reich mass murder has such a sloppy conspiracy that it WASN"T responsible, around it, that arrests and prosecutions are the only sane conclusion. the fact that every cowardly bastard who refuses to blow the whistle on the mass murderers, keeps them walking, is ridiculous. they have all the guns. they hold all the cards.
thepofmeister 1 year ago
Okay. I buy into the conspiracy theories for a few minutes.
Why the fuck would the BBC know about the conspiracy to blow up WTC 7?!?!?!?
Sweepingreaper4 1 year ago
Because the world media is controlled by the SAME people.
They control the media, Hollywood, Military, Police, Government. EVERYTHING.
Illuminati control everything.
79Sarwar 1 year ago
@Sweepingreaper4
maybe you google for london and the relationships with the illuminati
great britain didnt send troops to irak after that??
TheMightyGuri 1 year ago
BBC=British Brainwashing Corporation or British Bullshit Corporation,
DONT WATCH BBC PPROPAGANDA EVER,DELETE THE CHANNEL FROM YOUR TV. NEVER NEVER NEVER WATCH BBC
ranj03 1 year ago
that made me lol
0zzy30020 1 year ago
Yes, because new organizations have NEVER, EVER made mistakes or reported things incorrectly.
Yes, because if the BBC news people were in on this, they wouldn't even digitally edit the building out of the picture.
And of course, the english reporters know the name and appearance of every single building in New York, so the building still standing was a conspiracy mistake rather than an honest error.
Conspiracy nuts are stupid.
thewandering01 1 year ago
Oops!
ij911 1 year ago
so the BBC was in on 9-11?
whathoney73 1 year ago
The building was still standing and then it was weakened with explosives placed on every support collumn and detonated with precision timing.
RobWarrens 1 year ago
the news reader had just been fed the story direct from the conspirator's mouths. "collapsed because it had been weakened"? How did they know for sure at that stage? Surely it would be more logical to assume that it had been attacked? Would you agree?
The media plants the seed and the majority of the public swallow it. If the news said it, it must be true.
MissingAmongPeople 1 year ago
this video was doctored...the clips of her don't match the guys clips...she doesn't really answer his questions...she mentions nothing of wtc7 in her talk, the print under he name is also doctored in....but good video and well made...it made me think a little.
TheMawkMan 1 year ago
disinfo.
NiGhtMarEs0nWax 1 year ago
fuck me.
antonyvt 1 year ago
"because, uh, the bulding had been weakened"..... (poker face)
electric789 2 years ago
9/11 was an inside job.
Fight4Privacy 2 years ago 57
@Fight4Privacy Still beats communism or nazirule :p
cassius969 1 year ago
inside job
bugsy5656 2 years ago 12
they really fucked up on that one this scripted report exposed....before the collapse of building 7
gasdorf 2 years ago 2
BBC can see the future!
dih70 2 years ago 2
3 building collaps:
wtc I and wtc II and building 7
nothing hits building 7 and this building stil standing on the background
:-)
sztano 2 years ago 2
there are the FBI and Gouvernement Floor s in this Building . the only floor whe are burning verry strange . I m e technician and i know there floor
julolive 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
its not still standing....i cnt see the wtc at any point in this video :S
JonnyJC93 2 years ago
WTC7 - the third building that collapsed on 911 that most people do not know about, not the twin towers. Both of the towers had been completely demolished by explosives at this point.
911REICHSTAG 2 years ago
oh i see know, so how can you prove what the time this report was?....and how could they predect it
JonnyJC93 2 years ago
That was CIA's bulding?
SzablaPL 2 years ago
not the twin towers, the one right behind her head, you can see it to the right of her a little
jakenfriedlove 2 years ago
ok i see know lol but wasnt wtc 7 demolished :S
JonnyJC93 2 years ago
Hush hush thats classified, the largest military industrial complex on earth, that spends more money on technology for killing people than all the other countries on earth combined is completely squakey clean. Just call me numbnutts xD
maximus2908 2 years ago