Sure Ron Paul is ahead of all the other candidates, but I'm sure we'll still be seeing "ROMNEY BY LANDSLIDE" all over the MSM tickers on super Tuesday..
Expose the blatant voter fraud that is going on all over the country!
@mrthompson878 not to be rude or anything, but you should probably start prepping. but i do hate that show, they make em look crazy. and they force em to choose one reason they are doing it. you cant just pick one. anyways, i started a few months ago.
Ron Paul actually has more in common with the Dems than he does with the Reps. I don't think that's a bad thing either. Ron Paul is most of the best features of both parties and almost none of the worst features.
@factualism4u Paulbots are the ones who are not brainwashed. who are you voting for? the most dishonest president we've ever had, or the man who might actually outdo him in dishonesty in Mr. Romney? or could it be that phony religious wacko Santorum? Santorum looks like the last shit I took all the time.
!!!!!DONATE TO THE MONEY BOMB!!!! If i had pockets like the banks, id donate the three million myself! I donated 25. With everyones support we can make it happen!! Ron Paul 2012!!!!
I really want Ron Paul to win. We just seems like the only candidate that isn't someone's puppet, but I just don't think he has a chance in hell of winning. The media does everything they can to insure that he doesn't get an edge on the other candidates.
@baasseball If that happened, Obama would be owned and Ron Paul would win by a landslide, no contest. That's why they're going to try their absolute hardest to make sure he doesn't win the GOP nomination from both sides of the aisle.
@2baldmen unless you declare why, then your comment has no significance. Do you want to be more in debt? do you want our economy to contniue to suffer? do you want less jobs? do you want more terrorist attacks? another ww3??? because if you don't vote for ron paul, that is what you will get.
The only time the Republicans win decisively, it's with "unelectable" platforms of American Conservatism. When the Republicans lose decisvely, it's always with a "moderate":
Paul would win a in landslide akin to the TEA Party, the Contract with America, and Ronald Reagan.
Romney will lose in a landslide akin to John McCain, and Bob Dole.
@Anubis2445 The CIA are drug dealers, and a corrupt government agency. Ron Paul doesn't support socialism, and also thinks people should take care of themselves. This has a payout, if he can get Americans to let go of socialism, he can abolish the IRS.
Its may not be the best pro Ron Paul video out there, but it still serves its purpose. Also, I think all these Ron Paul ads with different styles help improve his demographic numbers overall.... or maybe Im just talkin BS. Regardless, These kind of videos stand out from the other vids because how its presented.
Ron Paul is certainly electable. He is the only Republican candidate who attracts large numbers of Independents and Democrats. That's what we need to defeat Obama.
This whole issue of electability is absolutely ridiculous. So you say a candidate has to abide by the status quo, so that he is "electable"?! Don't you see that the status quo is exactly what has brought America to the brink of bankruptcy today? Just look at all the stupid wars we have entered. All of them were led by the so-called "electable" candidates, and the fact that those guys are considered electable is the very thing that has brought about this disaster!
We need Ron Paul as our President. He is the only truly patriotic Republican candidate. The others are all in the pockets of special interests at the expense of American taxpayers.
Since when did the American constitution become "unelectable"? Since when did the personal liberties become a subject of smirk and ridicule on national TV? Is this still America?
@vyrpalmeris And like i said before, the American population is not as naive as you think they are. Almost everybody is suffering to some degree in their personal- financial lives and that is what will be the motivating factor...not Obama's smile or his demeanor.
@vyrpalmeris The only reason Obama was voted in,shows how disgusted the population was with Bush jr.Obama seemed to be the furthest thing from Bush at that time and the best alternative.Fast forward 4 years and what do we have? our constitution has been further eroded,bills like S-510- you can't even grow a vegetable in your backyard. The Defence Authorisation Act-any American that is" imagined" to be a terrorist can be assasinated without a trial..Substance over style- obama out Dr.RON PAUL in.
A. Spending money so that fisherman can fish is spending money on the people. I wasn't aware there was an anti-fisherman vote, but that doesn't make your claims any more accurate.
B. What I believe in is not taking the money from the people to begin with. Ron Paul can't spend your income tax dollars on evil corporate shrimp fisherman if he doesn't have it to begin with.
C. I don't support Social Security insurance. It's bankrupt, and I have already invested my money more wisely.
He may do well in Iowa but has NO chance to win the election...He WILL have to answer for the racist news letters, He is wrong on decriminalizing ALL drugs, He's wrong on Iran, He wants to decrease Defense spending by 200 billion dollars (almost 30%)... What would have happened if Reagan decided NOT to INCREASE defense spending by 25%... Or if Reagan would not have opened bases all over the globe and put troops around the world??
Is Ron Paul my ideal candidate? No. In fact, I disagree with him on countless issues, and yet still he's my favourite candidate. Makes me realise how poorly represented I am :/
@vyrpalmeris You're contradicting yourself. You like his track record and his policies,and then you call him a "crotchety old man" therefore making him- unelectable.According to CNN, Paul is leading in Iowa by 23% over the Grinch and Romney. The voters might be more intelligent and less shallow than you give them credit for. As far as being too old. Ronald Reagan was 72 when he was inaugerated in 1980 - one of the most influential Republican presidents in modern history.
@BallsadeepmodeXYZ I am not contradicting myself at all. He's got a pretty good track record and good policies and I like most of that about him. But again, he is unappealing to the general public and we all know how capable Obama is of winning over an ignorant voter base due only to an appealing appearance and charisma. RP does not have that. Reagan was old, but he was extremely likable. Paul simply is not as "likable" and this video is ignorant of that.
@vyrpalmeris i bet you have fantasies about Obama do you? you are an absolute idiot.
You vote for a president because of his policies,his agenda...not his style or his demeanor.I'll
take "wisdom" over youth any day or any year...for that matter.
YOU and people like you are the reason we are so fucked up as a society.What about Rick SantorIum ? he's a sexy stud.He want's to take you to IRAN for a little vacation!!!!!
Are you willing? WAKE UP AND SNAP OUT OF IT BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE
@BallsadeepmodeXYZ Amazing to see the hate come out of people simply for disagreeing with something. I am a conservative republican and I hate what Obama has done and I'm proud to say I never voted for him. I don't support Paul for many reasons and that is my right. He's not the only person out there who will protect that right so lay off of me. I'm just pointing out that this video does nothing to refute what the media calls him "unelectable" for.
Debatestats com has a story in today's blog on their statistical analysis which shows Paul has not received an equal number of questions during the debates this year. Check it out at debatestats com
Any smart person can see Ron Paul is the Man and for the People not Big Banks & Wall-Street like Obama clearly is for. If Obama and Ron Paul ever had a debate Ron Paul would kick his ass and make a fool out of him just like he does to any other Puppet.
This video doesn't attack the real things that make Ron Paul impossible to elect. Sure, it lists off some great things about him, but the fact is that no matter how appealing his track record and policies are, a crotchety old man doesn't stand a chance with the general electorate. Obama would easily defeat him because his personality is more appealing. THAT makes Ron Paul un-electable.
@vyrpalmeris Ron Paul would end the Federal reserve & Restore America you fucking IDIOT. Any smart America can see Ron Paul's Great Record at defending the Constitution. People like you aren't Real Americans and should be expelled with all these traitors like Obama, McCain and all these Zionist scum. You are Worthless.
@4truthjusticefreedom I hope you feel better after lashing out and insulting me in public, you psycho. People like you make all of Ron Paul's supporters look insane. Why don't you relax a little bit? He's a crotchety old grandpa and not appealing to look at or listen to, so NO MATTER HOW MUCH I AGREE WITH HIM HE WON'T BE ELECTED so go back in your hole do something helpful for society by not coming out.
@vyrpalmeris "People like you make all of Ron Paul's supporters look insane. Why don't you relax a little bit? He's a crotchety old grandpa"
Haha. You can't be this stupid.
I wouldn't care if Ron Paul was a 50 year old transsexual who liked to have sex in mascot costumes, all that matters is that he's got the right ideas. He's predicted exactly what has been happening for years.
But, no, you morons just want to elect another stupid liar again. You're unreachable morons.
@vyrpalmeris I must say you can not be very smart. When we have watched all the flavors of the week fall while Ron Paul steadily rises in the polls. Consistently staying in the top tier which not a single other one could. This word electability has been thrown around in the media. It is a made up word that is not factual according to the polls. You sir are proof of how propaganda and ignorance to what the media tells you to believe work
What you are dancing around is that an ignorant, douche-bag public that doesn't know it's ass from it's elbow is why Ron Paul is un-electable, since personality has little to no bearing on one's ability to execute the Constitution.
End the Federal Reserve--End the IRS and income tax--Withdraw ALL troops immediately--Cut $1T in spending year one--Eliminate five federal departments. Sound like REAL change that you want? Then vote Ron Paul for president.
Only thing that it keeping me from voting on this guy is his belief in NOT separating church and state and him following the constitution so blindly. Its not perfect, but he's still the closest real candidate out there, and forget about Herman Cain. He is just insane.
drugs aren't wrong? tell that one to my mother. you're wrong, I don't mind pot, but other drugs? if you think that they are right then you are naive of what they actually do to a lot of people.
Lol why wouldn't Wall Street like this guy, he wants to deregulate wall street and he wants to lower their taxes. Wall Street has lobbied for years for deregulation and Paul agrees completely with it.
Pretty sure the fat cats like Ron Paul because he wants to stop taxing them. Also I think the drug dealers like him too cause he wants to legalize drugs.
@DevilBoyVex ... just "legalize drugs"? not quite. Check out the debates where he talks about the (failed) "War on Drugs" that he wants to end. He asks... If heroin were not illegal, would everyone in the room go out and start taking heroin?
@WhistlingTube If heroin were not illegal (that means if heroin were legal) would everyone in that room go out and start taking heroin? Probably not. Would more people use heroin? Absolutely yes. More people drink alcohol now, than they did when it was in prohibition, sure people drank during prohibition but now just about everyone drinks.
@DevilBoyVex OK, you seem to br misunderstanding Ron Pauls position on the War on Drugs. Infact, he wouldn't legalize heroin. He would look to bring legislation down to a state level so that states can control what is legal. Heroin certainly would still be illegal, and rightly so. The only difference we would see would be with hemp and marijuana. But they would stop wasting billions on this "War On Drugs", which doesn't work.
@WhistlingTube Yeah you are right, he doesn't want to regulate drugs on a federal level, that's a states right according to the 10th amendment. But why should heroin stay illegal? Not many people who don't use it now would go out and become druggies if it was legal tomorrow. Even if they did, shouldn't they have control over their own bodies? As long as they aren't committing crimes when they are high, why should a drug user be arrested for choosing to get high? Their body, their choice.
@icomewithfries I personally completely agree with your point. If someone gets high, thats their own choice. For example: If someone is stupid enough to drink a bottle of bleach, its their own fault - should we make that illegal too? If someone committed a crime while high, they should pay the price - without being able to blame it on "being high" and just get away with being sent to rehab.
I believe the best way to prevent people from doing such stupid things it to educate them.
Alcohol consumption rose to record levels during alcohol prohibition.
National alcohol prohibition began in 1920. Apparent alcohol use fell from 1914 to 1922. It rose thereafter. By 1925, arrests for public drunkenness and similar alcohol-related offenses were already above the pre-prohibition records. Consumption by women and children increased dramatically. All prohibition does it make it more dangerous to use drugs and less possible to get treatment.
@DevilBoyVex Are you implying that gangsters didn't prosper during the age of prohibition? Drug dealers can charge extortionate amounts for drugs because they're illegal and untaxed.
@MichelinDUD They can make more if they don't have to pay bribes and can sell them legally. If they can open a shop and sell drugs, surely that is a better life than facing illegal transactions that have high robbery costs from customers and the constant chance of police taking away all your profits. They can prosper when drugs are illegal, I'm sure they can prosper MORE if drugs are legal. A shop selling drugs makes more than a vendor, even if the shop is taxed.
@MichelinDUD They did prosper, but they prospered more after the age of prohibition. Happy? I answered your question they prosper but they prosper more without. I said it in my previous answer but I guess I have to spell it out for you.
@DevilBoyVex I appreciate you spelling it out for me, but it's simply not true. The money to pay off officials doesn't come close to the amount they earn from no tax, no regulations of quality, and the fact people will pay more for something hard to access.
@MichelinDUD lol, let me ask you, if I wanted to expand my business of distributing cocaine in the United States, how do I do that and how do I earn more profits? I need a bigger customer base. Let's say I have the ability to produce 100 tons of cocaine a year and I supply my distributors who supply the petty dealers. Would I not benefit more if I increased produced and supplied it to legit chain stores? You realize our big beer companies had histories of being illegal manufacturers right?
@DevilBoyVex So the sources of where the consumer gets the drugs change, the producers do not. The producers already hold a monopoly on the production, and they are the true dealers that the FBI has been trying to catch for years. No one gives a crap about the petty dealer that hangs out in the ghetto. They care about the source of where the drug is from and it's usually from foreign nations that hold a monopoly on natural resources to produce the best drugs. THEY WILL PROFIT a lot, so will we.
LOL! Your prediction that there wouldn't be any new, local producers of drugs once its legalized is probably the silliest epitome of your already silly argument.
@DevilBoyVex What you have to appreciate, is that anyone can get weed. It would make sense that sticking weed in convenience stores would increase accessibility, but not by a massive amount.
@MichelinDUD Why does society look down on drugs like heroin, weed, cocaine, and ect. In part because it is illegal. Alcohol is socially acceptable. If the government makes something legal, overtime it will intertwine in with social standards. I drink alcohol but I wouldn't dream of doing heroin. Why? I've been told drugs are bad since I was young but never alcohol was bad. Why? Because alcohol is legal. Legalizing drugs will change America 50 years down the line into a drug nation.
@DevilBoyVex (as a side note, it's not grammatically correct to say and etc, given that et cetera literally means "and other things", so it's like saying "and and other things". Not a dig, just a helpful fact for you) My question to you is, why is American being a drug nation any worse than America being an alcohol nation?
@MichelinDUD Well I don't like America being a alcohol nation. Alcohol kills enough people as it is. I would outlaw it if I can and reduce it back to being on the black market. But it's too late now, alcohol has become our culture. I do not want the same mistake happening again. I don't want people dying all the time cause people are driving while drugged. I don't want tons of druggies like how we have tons of alcoholics. It's just as bad and I hate both alcohol and drugs.
Alcohol became "our" culture when it was invented thousands of years before prohibition ever existed. Pot is also a part of our culture, prohibition or no prohibition. All prohibition does is give rise to the black market and the criminals who run it.
@MichelinDUD Do you know how many murders we have a year because of alcohol? Almost all domestic abuse cases are because the father of the house is a alcoholic. Most rape cases in America happen because of alcohol. Do I want more of this crap with another problem due to drugs? Do I want to see ads on television warning about how teens shouldn't do heroin cause people will rape you at parties like I see ads about it regarding alcohol?
@DevilBoyVex Please for the love of god go educate yourself. You said you would go back to prohibition? it didn't work then and it wont work now. just like it the drug war causes way more problems then good. Terrorist organizations profit from growing and selling drugs worldwide because it is not legal for our farmers to produce and sell. We imprison people at 60k a year for drug use while rapist and murders get times reduced because of over crowded jails.
@Malzarius85 Less people used alcohol during prohibition so I say it worked. Of course some will drink even when it is illegal but less drink. So in what ways did it not work? Having a underground market is better than having it legal. America doesn't even have the soil nor the resources to profit from growing drugs. The best drugs come from the "Brown countries." And most rapists and murders do drugs so... I would like to see your statistics that we let murders out to bring druggies in.
More people used alcohol during prohibition so I say you are delusional. You continue your delusions in the rest of your comment. Having an underground market is better than having an open and regulated market? America doesn't have the soil nor the resources to profit from growing drugs? Not only is this blatantly ridiculous but its already proven wrong in California. The best drugs come from places where its legal to produce them LOL. Most artists, and musicians do drugs too, so?
@DevilBoyVex Our doctors are legally selling Ritalin and adderall to people which is speed, oxycodone which is heroin, and all kinds of other masking drugs that never heal you so you stay on them for life. So basically the country is already drug addicts,Like Dr. Paul says only the moral of ones character can help them. The Drug war is a failure and inhuman in so many ways.
@Malzarius85 Legally selling it to people who have problems. I have no issues with drugs for people with problems, I have huge issues with people who use drugs that don't have medical clearance. Well most people do not use ritalin or adderall so no America is not a drug addict nation. When more than 50% of our population start using ritalin nd adderall sure, when drugs get mainstream as much as alcohol then we are a drugged nation. I say we kill the drug producers before we become one.
@DevilBoyVex I have huge issues with people who think that they can tell other people what to do with their own bodies. Just putting aside the 40,000 dead in Mexico due to drug cartels, the gang violence associated with drug prohibition, and the billions of dollars we waste every year, my main issue is people have the right to their own minds and bodies. If someone wants to shoot up heroin in their own home, they have that right. Crimes against other people, not one's self, should be the issue.
@icomewithfries Devil Boy is a paid troll. Don't waste your time with him. We all know what's going on with our freedoms and this bullshit SCAM taking place.
@haolejohn Yeah I've noticed, it's sad how people just like to trample on our freedoms. If I want to use drugs I think I should be able to, but someone sitting in their home thinks they have moral judgement over my actions to be able to punish me for choosing what I want to put into my own body. Not to mention the other violations of the constitution, like the Patriot Act and stuff. It's disgusting.
@DevilBoyVex A nation that can tell people what they can and can't do with their own bodies scares me more than a nation where 'druggies' are allowed to harm themselves. Just the idea of a nation that owns my body and can tell me what to do with it freaks me out. The idea of someone who thinks they can tell other people how to live, given they aren't hurting anyone but themselves, disgusts me.
@icomewithfries Suicide is illegal. Slavery is illegal even if you agree to be a slave. There are rights that are unalienable even from me. So ingrained in human nature that I do not even own. I am not allowed to take my own life, nor am I allowed to deprive myself of my own right to pursuit happiness (the idea behind willing slavery). Does a nation that allow their own people to self destruct not horrify you? Does the idea that if I wish to die I may end my own life not horrify you?
"Suicide is illegal." And it shouldn't be. "Slavery is illegal even if you agree.." Wow. you really are special. "Slavery" that you agree too is called voluntarism and it isn't illegal."Does a nation that allow their own people to self destruct not horrify you?" So you are obviously for banning abortion, cheeseburgers and automobiles." Does the idea that if I wish to die I may end my own life not horrify you?" No. It doesn't horrify me, but your irrational thought patterns do.
@icomewithfries you assume from a selfish standpoint. I do not own everything that is ingrained to me. My life is partially to my state because I am born into a society and supported by that society. I owe a duty to not take my own life or ruin my own life because it affects those around me and society as a whole. I am under contract with the state. There is no such thing as absolute freedom for a man who lives in a society. If you want the type of freedom you seek, live by yourself in a forest
@DevilBoyVex If someone pays their taxes, they are contributing all that is legally required of them. If someone pays their taxes they are living by the social contract required by the state. If they monetarily contribute what they can to the government which provides services for the public good, it is not my business what they do in their spare time.
@DevilBoyVex Regardless of how cruel it is to abandon your family and friends, through suicide, drug abuse, moving to live in a forest or whatever, forcing people to live a life that will benefit everyone around them is not something that I would approve of. I know that people like you have only the best intentions for society as a whole, however I do not believe that forcing people to do things for the greater good is morally right either.
@DevilBoyVex People should have the right to harm themselves in whatever way they chose. I believe that direct and intentionally indirect physical harm (murder, rape, , negligence, ect.) and intentional emotional harm (bullying, teasing, ect.) should be illegal. However regulating unintentional emotional harm goes beyond reasonable limits. Unintentionally harming others by harming yourself isn't a good thing, but by regulating it we enter a totalitarian style of government.
@DevilBoyVex Going along with the reasoning behind suicide being illegal, the following things should also be illegal: actions that will lead to an early death (smoking tobacco, being obese), needlessly risking your life for thrills (skydiving, rock climbing), divorce (think of the children!), and alcoholism (think of the families!). By restraining what a person can do with their own body because it might emotionally hurt others is based on good intentions, but will take away basic freedoms.
@DevilBoyVex Speaking of the societal harm of drugs, the war on drugs has caused more emotional harm than the drugs themselves have, in my opinion. What kind of emotional harm have the deaths of 40,000 innocent Mexicans caused? How about a 12 year old kid who joined a violent gang because illegally selling drugs allowed him to make easy cash? How about the thousands of people who's career dreams were ruined by a non-violent drug charge? These are not isolated events, they happen every day.
@DevilBoyVex Sorry for the rant, it's just I strongly believe drugs are a medical issue, not a criminal justice one. Prison is not going to stop the supply or demand for drugs, and they are just as easy to get in prison by the way. The only way to stop people from abusing them is through support and help, not punishment. Legalizing drugs stops almost all the violence associated with drugs, no more gangs or drug cartels. It also allows the addicts to ask for help without fear of punishment. :D
LOL! The truth finally comes out. This guy truly believes that he owes his life and his freedoms to the state. No one need take this discussion any further. It is now perfectly clear where all his other ideas stem from. Sadly, I am not surprised.
Your solution to murder and death from drug usage is to murder all the citizens in countries that produce drugs? LOL! You are officially passed the point of no return in your downward spiral into delusional oblivion and away from any rational or reasonable debate.
"Almost all abuse cases are because the father of the house is a alcoholic"
No. This is false. What is true, is that 100% of abuse cases are because the abuser has a problem with violence. You are using drugs as an excuse to ignore the real causes of violence and the real solutions that can come from alleviating ourselves of the ignorant idea that drugs are the cause of drug abuse. This is like saying that you can prevent suicide by outlawing razor blades and Valium.
Making decisions based solely on the incorrect information you are told by other ignorant people who don't know what they are talking about is your right as an American. Please don't impose your shallow uneducated views which have no basis in fact, history or reality on the rest of us.
The truth is Alcohol is bad for you and prohibition doesn't work.
@MichelinDUD I disagree not everyone can get weed. I would say most people do not know where to get weed. Break it down percentage wise by age groups and classification of people. There are a lot of people who don't live in big cities and have no access to any dealers. You telling someone in little town Ohio can get weed? If it was legal, you can get weed in any city, any town, any place in the United States through regular stores. Distribution will be up, production up, profits up.
Yes. Everyone can get weed everywhere. The fact that you are ignorant to this reality may have a lot to do with all of your other sheltered and naive views on society.
@MichelinDUD You don't think there is a bigger revenue that comes out of the alcohol industry after prohibition ended? It's about the expansion of your customer base. Ron Paul doesn't think more people will use heroin if it was legal? Back during prohibition only 5% or less of people drank alcohol (which is a deadly drug that kills thousands of people a year) and now roughly 99 percent of all people have had alcohol at some point in their lives. Roughly 20% drink it consistently.
Unfortunately, reality and history do not support the "facts" you claim. All prohibition did was take alcohol usage off the books, where it increased & festered into political corruption and judicial inefficiency. Prohibition gave rise to the one of the biggest national crime waves in the history of our country, and it immediately transferred power from voters to gangsters. It's easy to understand why you hold the positions you do, seeing as to how incorrect you are about history
Silly talk. Drug dealers don't make money because the overhead is so low. They make money because there is no competition or regulation against fraud in the black market. No one will pay a drug dealer for what they can get @ 7-11. You are just being silly now.
@DevilBoyVex silly, you realize of course that drug dealers would not like ron paul, the whole point of legalizing drugs is that it would put petty drug dealers out of business right? people wouldn't have to buy stuff cut with rat poison, they could get it from the store, you get that right?
@dannyjohansson Yeahhh so the drug dealers can open stores selling them, and most dealers are also users, I play a lot of online poker and I don't get taxed but I would rather have someone legalize online poker than have the DOJ go around shutting down sites. I'm sure full tilt (the drug dealer) would rather do their business out in the open. I'm not talking about some junkie selling on a street corner. I'm talking about dealers who monopolize the industry, the manufacturers. The big dealers.
@dannyjohansson You don't think the mass producers of cocaine who have to figure out illegal ways to transport the drugs into America every year would be happy if they could start doing business and import/export tons and tons of drugs without bribing officials and suffer huge risks of losing merchandise? You think of drug dealers as some guy who sells drugs on the street corner. I think of drug dealers as producers who have thousands of people working for them making cocaine.
No offense, but this is pretty stupid. You have to be living under a rock not to see the fat cats attacking Ron Paul as though their lives depended on it.
Secondly, legalizing drugs would put every single drug dealer in the country out of business over night. Why would you risk your life and your freedom to pay a drug dealer twice as much for something you can walk down to Walmart and buy for half price or even get for free with your insurance card? Try to think things through.
Hey everyone! Just released a song this week that was taylor-made for the Ron Paul R3VOLUTION. You can find it on my channel under the "original music- studio recordings" playlist, or just search "paul trinca ron paul". Doing my best to spread his message!!
U HAVE TO BE A REGISTERED REPUBLICAN IN MOST STATES TO VOTE FOR RON PAUL IN THE PRIMARY ELECTION WHICH IS IMPORTANT + U NEED 2 DO ASAP! GET HELP CHANGING PARTY AT BLUEREPUBLICAN. . U HAVE ONLY UP TO 12 WEEKS BEFORE PRIMARY CONVENTION IN SOME STATES!! HE NEEDS 2 WIN THE PRIMARY ELECTION IN ORDER TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT IN THE GENERAL ELECTION. COPY/PASTE + SHARE EVERYWHERE!! RONPAUL2012!
This event lists all the Ron Paul events going on in december and is a collective effort to give Ron Paul a push, and make sure he wins: Go to facebook and look up the event PUSH FOR PAUL DECEMBER BOMB! ALL ARE WELCOME!!!! GO LIBERTY!!!!!
In order for Dr.Paul to win, HE NEEDS THE PRIMARY. That's the toughest part.
IF YOU WANT TO VOTE IN PRIMARY YOU HAVE TO BE REGISTERED REPUBLICAN! If you don't switch parties in time, (3 months ahead in some states from now) YOU WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO VOTE!!
Go to BLUEREPUBLICAN(dot)ORG and register ASAP! Copy and paste this everywhere! Thumbs up to help this be on top.
- WARNING DO NOT UPDATE THE LAST YOUTUBE VERSION - because it doesnt have friend invite and do not have channel views - This is a move for not allowing the public to see that your channel has much more views than others and also a move to not allow you have more friends on your list or communicate with people - They are trying to manipulate public opinion with this move to not allow people organize against immoral and warmonger governments with world record of debts..
It is not enough to say OK, you're right, I will vote for Ron Paul. You have to get some one else to Vote Ron Paul. Both political parties are bought and paid for by the establishment that want everything you have and that have a ton of money to donate. You will hear the words "Oh but they will never let him be elected"
The THEY is YOU. You are the 99%. You have 99% of the vote. Only you can defeat Ron Paul. Take a friend to your republican primary and vote. It's the only hope you have.
Great video! Ron Paul is the only HONEST candidate. He never waivers and is a true hero of the Republic. He's the only one who can save our personal liberty. They can kill many of us but they cannot kill an idea whose time has come. Whatever happens, we will NEVER NEVER NEVER give up the quest for FREEDOM against tyranny. We will win and we march on and on and on for LIBERTY!
If we keep electing crooked, underhanded liars into office, we'll just keep getting more Bush's and Obama's....we have to go for the good candidate if we want any hope at all of saving our freedom and our country. Vote Ron Paul
The only reason I didn't vote for Ron Paul during the 2008 election is because he pulled out days before - asking for everyone to vote for other third party candidates. I voted for Ralph Nader (also a bad-ass). This time I will still probably reserve my vote for Ron Paul. Do not for for the lesser of two evils. If you vote for a Republican or a Democrat you're really just deciding whether you want to get stabbed in the belly or the back.
no... it's because the media largely ignored him in 2008 AS WELL! 95% of the media concentrated on McCains name, instead of Ron Paul, who largely had the supreme number of votes than any of the other REp. candidates.
It was RON PAUL who should of been the Rep. front runner in '08, not stupid McCain (who's presidency would have been just as bad as Obama's)
@Eye2EyeIIIV IT doesn't matter what the propaganda machine tells you to think. You know what's real and you decide what you think is important. You're on the right path. I can tell. Try not to get too down on others for not getting up to speed too fast. Remember that you were once just as ignorant as they were. I only say that because I get impatient too.
Anyway, try to help out as much as possible. These days we'll need a lot of cool heads and calm words. Peace and love, bro.
'Spreading democracy' is a noble idea. IF - and it's a big 'if' - the people are asking for intervention. In the case of Libya, rebels were being massacred and were requesting assistance to level the playing field. Obama offered reasonable, measured assistance and handed over control to other nations. Is that imperialism? I don't think so.
The fact that the Libyan mob shamelessly desecrated Gaddafi's corpse is irrelevant.
No strong nation should ignore the cries of the weak.
The FSB today: a letter sent to Putin by Japanese PM Noda contains a warning that US President Barack Obama has issued an executive-level “kill order” against Congressman Ron Paul over fears this charismatic politician is about to expose to all Americans what can only be described as the largest mass theft in human history. The “kill order” is a metaphor for silencing down congressman Ron Paul in the mass media as if he doesn’t exist.
Cont -Did you see these shitheads out in the streets protesting when Bush was launching trillion dollar wars, operating gulags, and wiretapping US citizens. It was common knowledge what Bush was doing. Enter Obama and the douchebags woke up - Take to the streets patriots!!! Too late libertarians - your new found outrage when Obama was in office exposes your real motivations. Whitey is slipping - I want my country back, founding fathers, wah wah wah wah!!!!!!!!
@JoeyPencils - It was liberals and lefties who were out in the streets protesting against Bush. If Ron Paul had any principles he would not be running for the nomination of the party that gave us Bush and the neocons.
Republicans wanna take us back 60-70 years when they think homosexuality didn't exist and blacks and women knew their place. Libertarians wanna take us back 200 years to a fantasy land where "the people" had power. I have alway believed that the vast majority of libertarians are pissed of white people who are scared shitless about the demographic changes happening in Ameica.
@scouser691 whaddaya think bout what we said, that we'd love to have Paul win the nom. cause then there'd be 1) someone to attack Obama's militarism and support of wall street, and 2) a bright light shown straight into the holes of libertarian free trade "logic."
@OccupyIdeas - Love ron paul on foreign affair issues. It's what he would domestically that is terrifying. Like i said earlier - libertarian efforts to neuter government would be tantamount to removing referees from the nfl. Game would be destroyed quickly. Likewise, wiping out government regulation basically tells corporatations and super wealthy that there are no rules. I'd like to ask a libertarian which nation in human history he can point to as a succesful model for such a system
@scouser691 i dislike Obama because of his actions just like i dislike Bush because of his actions. If you want to make it about race, that is your issue but perhaps back to back "worst. presidents. ever" are creating these protests. and perhaps, until we get a president with actual values these protests will continue...
@shilelea - Couple of quick question -Where was the tea party when Bush was in office and launching trillion dollar wars against nations that never attacked us. Where was the tea party when Bush was operating gulags and torturing enemy fighters?
@scouser691 the tea party movement didnt start til after Obama was elected. However, it wasn't formed ONLY because Obama is a shitty president, it was formed because the last 6 elections had produced primarily cookie cutter presidents with no real difference in policy. Obama's policy which is touted as change from Bush simply isn't. he has spread Bushes wars and still hasn't shut down Gitmo. To call racial discrimination and then tout Bush's failures is very ignorant.
@shilelea - Kinda proved my point there then didn't you. If the tea party stands against neocon wars, massice deficits, gulags and torture and wiretapping then Bush was the poster boy for all these - So where were these people during the bush years - Deadly silent. The hypocrisy is breathtaking
@scouser691 first of all many people were vocal during Bush's presidency, just because they didn't have an organization doesn't mean they were silent. Second you fail to address that Obama is the same person that Bush is tilted a little more socialist and a little less fascist. most tea party people if you would just talk to them view Obama as a continuation of Bush and a representation of a Two party Failure.
@shilelea - Yeah many people were vocal during the Bush presidency - They were called liberals and lefties. Not a peep from Libertarian/tea party crowd. Like I said - These tea partiers are conservative republicans and vast majority voted for Bush. Never voted for Obama mate. I admit I preferred him over Bush (No Brainer)
@shilelea - Ron Paul is running for the nomination of the party that brought us the necon wars. Most libertarians are right wing conservatives, most voted for Bush. Now Ron Paul is their man. Be very fucking afraid
This has been flagged as spam show
Sure Ron Paul is ahead of all the other candidates, but I'm sure we'll still be seeing "ROMNEY BY LANDSLIDE" all over the MSM tickers on super Tuesday..
Expose the blatant voter fraud that is going on all over the country!
AlienBeliever897 4 days ago
If Ron Paul doesn't win, I am going to become like one of those doomsday preppers on National Geographic.
mrthompson878 4 days ago
@mrthompson878 not to be rude or anything, but you should probably start prepping. but i do hate that show, they make em look crazy. and they force em to choose one reason they are doing it. you cant just pick one. anyways, i started a few months ago.
Fyreguy16 2 days ago
Ron Paul actually has more in common with the Dems than he does with the Reps. I don't think that's a bad thing either. Ron Paul is most of the best features of both parties and almost none of the worst features.
adamiuswrecks 5 days ago
The Constitution is not intended to be enforced BY the voters, but AGAINST them.
Obviously, there would be no NEED for a Constitution to enforce what the voters already want anyway, their elected delegates would see to that.
So it's just silly to think that the voters are going to WANT to uphold the Constitution, when it gets in the way of mob rule.
Capiche?
SovereignStatesman 1 week ago
Cartoons... Typical. I guess they have to appeal to the intelligence level of those brainwashed into the Cult of Paul.
factualism4u 1 week ago
@factualism4u
Which happens to be the HIGHEST of ANY political party, Republicratard.
SovereignStatesman 1 week ago
@factualism4u Paulbots are the ones who are not brainwashed. who are you voting for? the most dishonest president we've ever had, or the man who might actually outdo him in dishonesty in Mr. Romney? or could it be that phony religious wacko Santorum? Santorum looks like the last shit I took all the time.
evilloren 12 hours ago
!!!!!DONATE TO THE MONEY BOMB!!!! If i had pockets like the banks, id donate the three million myself! I donated 25. With everyones support we can make it happen!! Ron Paul 2012!!!!
hopeintransit 1 week ago
I think Ron Paul is the shit, but I think that this video is a bit cheesy
AugerDP 2 weeks ago
I really want Ron Paul to win. We just seems like the only candidate that isn't someone's puppet, but I just don't think he has a chance in hell of winning. The media does everything they can to insure that he doesn't get an edge on the other candidates.
superdramallama123 3 weeks ago
Ron Paul supporters we need to flood the huffington post with support for Ron Paul
glajl 1 month ago
I would love to see a Ron Paul vs. Obama debate. The thing would be classic.
baasseballl 1 month ago
@baasseball If that happened, Obama would be owned and Ron Paul would win by a landslide, no contest. That's why they're going to try their absolute hardest to make sure he doesn't win the GOP nomination from both sides of the aisle.
Nekokun77 1 month ago
RON PAUL 2012!!
WV202 1 month ago
WrongPaul
2baldmen 1 month ago
@2baldmen unless you declare why, then your comment has no significance. Do you want to be more in debt? do you want our economy to contniue to suffer? do you want less jobs? do you want more terrorist attacks? another ww3??? because if you don't vote for ron paul, that is what you will get.
coryoreo25 1 month ago
The only time the Republicans win decisively, it's with "unelectable" platforms of American Conservatism. When the Republicans lose decisvely, it's always with a "moderate":
Paul would win a in landslide akin to the TEA Party, the Contract with America, and Ronald Reagan.
Romney will lose in a landslide akin to John McCain, and Bob Dole.
KAZVorpal 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
People said the colonies couldn't beat the British.
People said Dr.Seuss couldn't write or draw.
People said Nikola Tesla's Alternating Current was a crazy idea.
People said we could never reach the moon.
People said flying would never be possible.
People said We would never have a black president.
People also say Ron Paul can't be elected. What do you think?
AnnoyingXboxer 1 month ago
Ron Paul is the best. Vote for him.
IceAgeColumbus 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Anubis2445 The CIA are drug dealers, and a corrupt government agency. Ron Paul doesn't support socialism, and also thinks people should take care of themselves. This has a payout, if he can get Americans to let go of socialism, he can abolish the IRS.
givemearandomnamenow 1 month ago
Comment removed
givemearandomnamenow 1 month ago
Ron Paul is cool but this video is fuckin awful
SyrithUB 1 month ago
@SyrithUB
Its may not be the best pro Ron Paul video out there, but it still serves its purpose. Also, I think all these Ron Paul ads with different styles help improve his demographic numbers overall.... or maybe Im just talkin BS. Regardless, These kind of videos stand out from the other vids because how its presented.
ZappaFan101 1 month ago
@SyrithUB
nah its great and imaginative your subjective stance is wrong based on my subjective opinion brah
Nabolzi 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul is certainly electable. He is the only Republican candidate who attracts large numbers of Independents and Democrats. That's what we need to defeat Obama.
SirTenenbaum 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This whole issue of electability is absolutely ridiculous. So you say a candidate has to abide by the status quo, so that he is "electable"?! Don't you see that the status quo is exactly what has brought America to the brink of bankruptcy today? Just look at all the stupid wars we have entered. All of them were led by the so-called "electable" candidates, and the fact that those guys are considered electable is the very thing that has brought about this disaster!
I REJECT THE STATUS QUO!
pynmot 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We need Ron Paul as our President. He is the only truly patriotic Republican candidate. The others are all in the pockets of special interests at the expense of American taxpayers.
BetyarPali 1 month ago
Woo Hoo, we are WINNING!! Unless there is voter fraud we got this!
Ron Paul 2012 or BU$T !!
1776Rosco 1 month ago 20
This has been flagged as spam show
Since when did the American constitution become "unelectable"? Since when did the personal liberties become a subject of smirk and ridicule on national TV? Is this still America?
pynmot 1 month ago
@vyrpalmeris And like i said before, the American population is not as naive as you think they are. Almost everybody is suffering to some degree in their personal- financial lives and that is what will be the motivating factor...not Obama's smile or his demeanor.
BallsadeepmodeXYZ 1 month ago
@vyrpalmeris The only reason Obama was voted in,shows how disgusted the population was with Bush jr.Obama seemed to be the furthest thing from Bush at that time and the best alternative.Fast forward 4 years and what do we have? our constitution has been further eroded,bills like S-510- you can't even grow a vegetable in your backyard. The Defence Authorisation Act-any American that is" imagined" to be a terrorist can be assasinated without a trial..Substance over style- obama out Dr.RON PAUL in.
BallsadeepmodeXYZ 1 month ago
@DrTronPaul
So your rebuttal is "Ron Paul is popular". LOL! Awesome!
YewTube2025 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DrTronPaul
A. Spending money so that fisherman can fish is spending money on the people. I wasn't aware there was an anti-fisherman vote, but that doesn't make your claims any more accurate.
B. What I believe in is not taking the money from the people to begin with. Ron Paul can't spend your income tax dollars on evil corporate shrimp fisherman if he doesn't have it to begin with.
C. I don't support Social Security insurance. It's bankrupt, and I have already invested my money more wisely.
YewTube2025 1 month ago
Comment removed
YewTube2025 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
He may do well in Iowa but has NO chance to win the election...He WILL have to answer for the racist news letters, He is wrong on decriminalizing ALL drugs, He's wrong on Iran, He wants to decrease Defense spending by 200 billion dollars (almost 30%)... What would have happened if Reagan decided NOT to INCREASE defense spending by 25%... Or if Reagan would not have opened bases all over the globe and put troops around the world??
jmr324 1 month ago
Ron Paul is a douchebag
lmacorp 2 months ago
LOl Cute video.. DO NOT FORGET! YOU NEED TO CHANGE PARTIES AND/OR REGISTER FOR RON PAUL’S PARTY (Currently republican) TO VOTE BEFORE APRIL 15TH 2012
♥ RON PAUL ♥ RON PAUL ♥ RON PAUL ♥ HE WINS HEARTS NOT JUST VOTES
FrancineStar 2 months ago
Cool commercial let America see it
averagejoeamerica100 2 months ago
so corny
1nav 2 months ago
Is Ron Paul my ideal candidate? No. In fact, I disagree with him on countless issues, and yet still he's my favourite candidate. Makes me realise how poorly represented I am :/
MichelinDUD 2 months ago
@MichelinDUD <3
piecharthosen 2 months ago
He also wants to stop taxing wall street.
DevilBoyVex 2 months ago
@vyrpalmeris You're contradicting yourself. You like his track record and his policies,and then you call him a "crotchety old man" therefore making him- unelectable.According to CNN, Paul is leading in Iowa by 23% over the Grinch and Romney. The voters might be more intelligent and less shallow than you give them credit for. As far as being too old. Ronald Reagan was 72 when he was inaugerated in 1980 - one of the most influential Republican presidents in modern history.
BallsadeepmodeXYZ 2 months ago
@BallsadeepmodeXYZ I am not contradicting myself at all. He's got a pretty good track record and good policies and I like most of that about him. But again, he is unappealing to the general public and we all know how capable Obama is of winning over an ignorant voter base due only to an appealing appearance and charisma. RP does not have that. Reagan was old, but he was extremely likable. Paul simply is not as "likable" and this video is ignorant of that.
vyrpalmeris 1 month ago
@vyrpalmeris i bet you have fantasies about Obama do you? you are an absolute idiot.
You vote for a president because of his policies,his agenda...not his style or his demeanor.I'll
take "wisdom" over youth any day or any year...for that matter.
YOU and people like you are the reason we are so fucked up as a society.What about Rick SantorIum ? he's a sexy stud.He want's to take you to IRAN for a little vacation!!!!!
Are you willing? WAKE UP AND SNAP OUT OF IT BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE
BallsadeepmodeXYZ 2 months ago
@BallsadeepmodeXYZ Amazing to see the hate come out of people simply for disagreeing with something. I am a conservative republican and I hate what Obama has done and I'm proud to say I never voted for him. I don't support Paul for many reasons and that is my right. He's not the only person out there who will protect that right so lay off of me. I'm just pointing out that this video does nothing to refute what the media calls him "unelectable" for.
vyrpalmeris 2 months ago
32 braindead people. even a monkey can understand this message.
mark3smle 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Debatestats com has a story in today's blog on their statistical analysis which shows Paul has not received an equal number of questions during the debates this year. Check it out at debatestats com
mtb3241 2 months ago
Any smart person can see Ron Paul is the Man and for the People not Big Banks & Wall-Street like Obama clearly is for. If Obama and Ron Paul ever had a debate Ron Paul would kick his ass and make a fool out of him just like he does to any other Puppet.
V
V
V
4truthjusticefreedom 2 months ago 39
i am from germany an hope also that ron
paul would be the next us president
Thachillah 2 months ago
Ron Paul is down to business, that is what makes him electable.
whiteknight8 2 months ago
This video doesn't attack the real things that make Ron Paul impossible to elect. Sure, it lists off some great things about him, but the fact is that no matter how appealing his track record and policies are, a crotchety old man doesn't stand a chance with the general electorate. Obama would easily defeat him because his personality is more appealing. THAT makes Ron Paul un-electable.
vyrpalmeris 2 months ago
@vyrpalmeris Ron Paul would end the Federal reserve & Restore America you fucking IDIOT. Any smart America can see Ron Paul's Great Record at defending the Constitution. People like you aren't Real Americans and should be expelled with all these traitors like Obama, McCain and all these Zionist scum. You are Worthless.
4truthjusticefreedom 2 months ago
@4truthjusticefreedom I hope you feel better after lashing out and insulting me in public, you psycho. People like you make all of Ron Paul's supporters look insane. Why don't you relax a little bit? He's a crotchety old grandpa and not appealing to look at or listen to, so NO MATTER HOW MUCH I AGREE WITH HIM HE WON'T BE ELECTED so go back in your hole do something helpful for society by not coming out.
vyrpalmeris 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@vyrpalmeris "People like you make all of Ron Paul's supporters look insane. Why don't you relax a little bit? He's a crotchety old grandpa"
Haha. You can't be this stupid.
I wouldn't care if Ron Paul was a 50 year old transsexual who liked to have sex in mascot costumes, all that matters is that he's got the right ideas. He's predicted exactly what has been happening for years.
But, no, you morons just want to elect another stupid liar again. You're unreachable morons.
fuzzywzhe 2 months ago
@vyrpalmeris psychos? on the internet?
JoeyPencils 2 months ago
@vyrpalmeris
Regardless, Ron Paul is the opposite of crotchety. I think you have age confused with capriciousness.
YewTube2025 1 month ago
@vyrpalmeris I must say you can not be very smart. When we have watched all the flavors of the week fall while Ron Paul steadily rises in the polls. Consistently staying in the top tier which not a single other one could. This word electability has been thrown around in the media. It is a made up word that is not factual according to the polls. You sir are proof of how propaganda and ignorance to what the media tells you to believe work
johndoe4407 2 months ago
@vyrpalmeris
What you are dancing around is that an ignorant, douche-bag public that doesn't know it's ass from it's elbow is why Ron Paul is un-electable, since personality has little to no bearing on one's ability to execute the Constitution.
YewTube2025 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
~~RON PAUL-2012-RESTORE AMERICA NOW~~
End the Federal Reserve--End the IRS and income tax--Withdraw ALL troops immediately--Cut $1T in spending year one--Eliminate five federal departments. Sound like REAL change that you want? Then vote Ron Paul for president.
(Copy/paste this; Keep the chain going, people)
~~RON PAUL-2012-RESTORE AMERICA NOW~~
branrules101 2 months ago
how does the elephant, the corporate master, the fat cat, and the drug cartel head all resemble newt gingrich in one way or another
absoluteanatomy1 2 months ago in playlist Liked videos
Comment removed
nickiz1 2 months ago
Awesome video!!!
TRUTHringsTRUE 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SHOCKING VIDEO:
"Obama QUITTING in 2012!"
CLICK ObamaSnippets
ObamaSnippets 2 months ago in playlist More videos from RonPaul2008dotcom
This has been flagged as spam show
Money bomb at RonPaul2012 is 1,027,000.00. DONATE NOW and spread the message.
RapsAlive 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Google "Ron Paul Petition 60 minutes"
Sign this petition to get Ron Paul featured on 60 minutes!!!
RON PAUL 2012!! please rate this up to keep at top ^_^
Burks420 2 months ago
Only thing that it keeping me from voting on this guy is his belief in NOT separating church and state and him following the constitution so blindly. Its not perfect, but he's still the closest real candidate out there, and forget about Herman Cain. He is just insane.
tehrulez 2 months ago
@tehrulez
First of all there is no separation of church and state in the Constitution. There is a protection OF religion FROM state.
Secondly, Ron Paul is FOR the separation of church and state.
So luckily you don't actually have any real reasons not to vote for Ron Paul. Excellent!
YewTube2025 1 month ago
drugs aren't wrong? tell that one to my mother. you're wrong, I don't mind pot, but other drugs? if you think that they are right then you are naive of what they actually do to a lot of people.
filmjunkie998 2 months ago
@filmjunkie998 Who said that drugs are "right"?
1coolguysuper 2 months ago
Lol why wouldn't Wall Street like this guy, he wants to deregulate wall street and he wants to lower their taxes. Wall Street has lobbied for years for deregulation and Paul agrees completely with it.
DevilBoyVex 2 months ago
(I like the image of the Corporation uses TV media like a puppet)
.
electrictroy2010 2 months ago in playlist More videos from RonPaul2008dotcom 9
Pretty sure the fat cats like Ron Paul because he wants to stop taxing them. Also I think the drug dealers like him too cause he wants to legalize drugs.
DevilBoyVex 2 months ago
@DevilBoyVex ... just "legalize drugs"? not quite. Check out the debates where he talks about the (failed) "War on Drugs" that he wants to end. He asks... If heroin were not illegal, would everyone in the room go out and start taking heroin?
WhistlingTube 2 months ago
@WhistlingTube If heroin were not illegal (that means if heroin were legal) would everyone in that room go out and start taking heroin? Probably not. Would more people use heroin? Absolutely yes. More people drink alcohol now, than they did when it was in prohibition, sure people drank during prohibition but now just about everyone drinks.
DevilBoyVex 2 months ago
@DevilBoyVex OK, you seem to br misunderstanding Ron Pauls position on the War on Drugs. Infact, he wouldn't legalize heroin. He would look to bring legislation down to a state level so that states can control what is legal. Heroin certainly would still be illegal, and rightly so. The only difference we would see would be with hemp and marijuana. But they would stop wasting billions on this "War On Drugs", which doesn't work.
Is arresting sick people for smoking weed right?
WhistlingTube 2 months ago
@WhistlingTube Yeah you are right, he doesn't want to regulate drugs on a federal level, that's a states right according to the 10th amendment. But why should heroin stay illegal? Not many people who don't use it now would go out and become druggies if it was legal tomorrow. Even if they did, shouldn't they have control over their own bodies? As long as they aren't committing crimes when they are high, why should a drug user be arrested for choosing to get high? Their body, their choice.
icomewithfries 2 months ago
@icomewithfries I personally completely agree with your point. If someone gets high, thats their own choice. For example: If someone is stupid enough to drink a bottle of bleach, its their own fault - should we make that illegal too? If someone committed a crime while high, they should pay the price - without being able to blame it on "being high" and just get away with being sent to rehab.
I believe the best way to prevent people from doing such stupid things it to educate them.
WhistlingTube 2 months ago
@DevilBoyVex
Actually you're wrong.
Alcohol consumption rose to record levels during alcohol prohibition.
National alcohol prohibition began in 1920. Apparent alcohol use fell from 1914 to 1922. It rose thereafter. By 1925, arrests for public drunkenness and similar alcohol-related offenses were already above the pre-prohibition records. Consumption by women and children increased dramatically. All prohibition does it make it more dangerous to use drugs and less possible to get treatment.
YewTube2025 1 month ago
@DevilBoyVex Are you implying that gangsters didn't prosper during the age of prohibition? Drug dealers can charge extortionate amounts for drugs because they're illegal and untaxed.
MichelinDUD 2 months ago
@MichelinDUD They can make more if they don't have to pay bribes and can sell them legally. If they can open a shop and sell drugs, surely that is a better life than facing illegal transactions that have high robbery costs from customers and the constant chance of police taking away all your profits. They can prosper when drugs are illegal, I'm sure they can prosper MORE if drugs are legal. A shop selling drugs makes more than a vendor, even if the shop is taxed.
DevilBoyVex 2 months ago
@DevilBoyVex I'll ask you again. Are you implying that gangsters didn't prosper during the age of prohibition?
MichelinDUD 2 months ago
@MichelinDUD They did prosper, but they prospered more after the age of prohibition. Happy? I answered your question they prosper but they prosper more without. I said it in my previous answer but I guess I have to spell it out for you.
DevilBoyVex 2 months ago
@DevilBoyVex I appreciate you spelling it out for me, but it's simply not true. The money to pay off officials doesn't come close to the amount they earn from no tax, no regulations of quality, and the fact people will pay more for something hard to access.
MichelinDUD 2 months ago
@MichelinDUD lol, let me ask you, if I wanted to expand my business of distributing cocaine in the United States, how do I do that and how do I earn more profits? I need a bigger customer base. Let's say I have the ability to produce 100 tons of cocaine a year and I supply my distributors who supply the petty dealers. Would I not benefit more if I increased produced and supplied it to legit chain stores? You realize our big beer companies had histories of being illegal manufacturers right?
DevilBoyVex 2 months ago
@DevilBoyVex So the sources of where the consumer gets the drugs change, the producers do not. The producers already hold a monopoly on the production, and they are the true dealers that the FBI has been trying to catch for years. No one gives a crap about the petty dealer that hangs out in the ghetto. They care about the source of where the drug is from and it's usually from foreign nations that hold a monopoly on natural resources to produce the best drugs. THEY WILL PROFIT a lot, so will we.
DevilBoyVex 2 months ago
@DevilBoyVex
LOL! Your prediction that there wouldn't be any new, local producers of drugs once its legalized is probably the silliest epitome of your already silly argument.
YewTube2025 1 month ago
@DevilBoyVex What you have to appreciate, is that anyone can get weed. It would make sense that sticking weed in convenience stores would increase accessibility, but not by a massive amount.
MichelinDUD 2 months ago
@MichelinDUD Why does society look down on drugs like heroin, weed, cocaine, and ect. In part because it is illegal. Alcohol is socially acceptable. If the government makes something legal, overtime it will intertwine in with social standards. I drink alcohol but I wouldn't dream of doing heroin. Why? I've been told drugs are bad since I was young but never alcohol was bad. Why? Because alcohol is legal. Legalizing drugs will change America 50 years down the line into a drug nation.
DevilBoyVex 2 months ago
@DevilBoyVex (as a side note, it's not grammatically correct to say and etc, given that et cetera literally means "and other things", so it's like saying "and and other things". Not a dig, just a helpful fact for you) My question to you is, why is American being a drug nation any worse than America being an alcohol nation?
MichelinDUD 2 months ago
@MichelinDUD Well I don't like America being a alcohol nation. Alcohol kills enough people as it is. I would outlaw it if I can and reduce it back to being on the black market. But it's too late now, alcohol has become our culture. I do not want the same mistake happening again. I don't want people dying all the time cause people are driving while drugged. I don't want tons of druggies like how we have tons of alcoholics. It's just as bad and I hate both alcohol and drugs.
DevilBoyVex 2 months ago
@DevilBoyVex
Alcohol became "our" culture when it was invented thousands of years before prohibition ever existed. Pot is also a part of our culture, prohibition or no prohibition. All prohibition does is give rise to the black market and the criminals who run it.
YewTube2025 1 month ago
@MichelinDUD Do you know how many murders we have a year because of alcohol? Almost all domestic abuse cases are because the father of the house is a alcoholic. Most rape cases in America happen because of alcohol. Do I want more of this crap with another problem due to drugs? Do I want to see ads on television warning about how teens shouldn't do heroin cause people will rape you at parties like I see ads about it regarding alcohol?
DevilBoyVex 2 months ago
@DevilBoyVex Please for the love of god go educate yourself. You said you would go back to prohibition? it didn't work then and it wont work now. just like it the drug war causes way more problems then good. Terrorist organizations profit from growing and selling drugs worldwide because it is not legal for our farmers to produce and sell. We imprison people at 60k a year for drug use while rapist and murders get times reduced because of over crowded jails.
Malzarius85 2 months ago
@Malzarius85 Less people used alcohol during prohibition so I say it worked. Of course some will drink even when it is illegal but less drink. So in what ways did it not work? Having a underground market is better than having it legal. America doesn't even have the soil nor the resources to profit from growing drugs. The best drugs come from the "Brown countries." And most rapists and murders do drugs so... I would like to see your statistics that we let murders out to bring druggies in.
DevilBoyVex 2 months ago
@DevilBoyVex
More people used alcohol during prohibition so I say you are delusional. You continue your delusions in the rest of your comment. Having an underground market is better than having an open and regulated market? America doesn't have the soil nor the resources to profit from growing drugs? Not only is this blatantly ridiculous but its already proven wrong in California. The best drugs come from places where its legal to produce them LOL. Most artists, and musicians do drugs too, so?
YewTube2025 1 month ago
@DevilBoyVex Our doctors are legally selling Ritalin and adderall to people which is speed, oxycodone which is heroin, and all kinds of other masking drugs that never heal you so you stay on them for life. So basically the country is already drug addicts,Like Dr. Paul says only the moral of ones character can help them. The Drug war is a failure and inhuman in so many ways.
Malzarius85 2 months ago
@Malzarius85 Legally selling it to people who have problems. I have no issues with drugs for people with problems, I have huge issues with people who use drugs that don't have medical clearance. Well most people do not use ritalin or adderall so no America is not a drug addict nation. When more than 50% of our population start using ritalin nd adderall sure, when drugs get mainstream as much as alcohol then we are a drugged nation. I say we kill the drug producers before we become one.
DevilBoyVex 2 months ago
@DevilBoyVex I have huge issues with people who think that they can tell other people what to do with their own bodies. Just putting aside the 40,000 dead in Mexico due to drug cartels, the gang violence associated with drug prohibition, and the billions of dollars we waste every year, my main issue is people have the right to their own minds and bodies. If someone wants to shoot up heroin in their own home, they have that right. Crimes against other people, not one's self, should be the issue.
icomewithfries 2 months ago
@icomewithfries Devil Boy is a paid troll. Don't waste your time with him. We all know what's going on with our freedoms and this bullshit SCAM taking place.
haolejohn 2 months ago
@haolejohn Yeah I've noticed, it's sad how people just like to trample on our freedoms. If I want to use drugs I think I should be able to, but someone sitting in their home thinks they have moral judgement over my actions to be able to punish me for choosing what I want to put into my own body. Not to mention the other violations of the constitution, like the Patriot Act and stuff. It's disgusting.
icomewithfries 2 months ago
@DevilBoyVex A nation that can tell people what they can and can't do with their own bodies scares me more than a nation where 'druggies' are allowed to harm themselves. Just the idea of a nation that owns my body and can tell me what to do with it freaks me out. The idea of someone who thinks they can tell other people how to live, given they aren't hurting anyone but themselves, disgusts me.
icomewithfries 2 months ago
@icomewithfries Suicide is illegal. Slavery is illegal even if you agree to be a slave. There are rights that are unalienable even from me. So ingrained in human nature that I do not even own. I am not allowed to take my own life, nor am I allowed to deprive myself of my own right to pursuit happiness (the idea behind willing slavery). Does a nation that allow their own people to self destruct not horrify you? Does the idea that if I wish to die I may end my own life not horrify you?
DevilBoyVex 2 months ago
@DevilBoyVex
"Suicide is illegal." And it shouldn't be. "Slavery is illegal even if you agree.." Wow. you really are special. "Slavery" that you agree too is called voluntarism and it isn't illegal."Does a nation that allow their own people to self destruct not horrify you?" So you are obviously for banning abortion, cheeseburgers and automobiles." Does the idea that if I wish to die I may end my own life not horrify you?" No. It doesn't horrify me, but your irrational thought patterns do.
YewTube2025 1 month ago
Comment removed
DevilBoyVex 2 months ago
@icomewithfries you assume from a selfish standpoint. I do not own everything that is ingrained to me. My life is partially to my state because I am born into a society and supported by that society. I owe a duty to not take my own life or ruin my own life because it affects those around me and society as a whole. I am under contract with the state. There is no such thing as absolute freedom for a man who lives in a society. If you want the type of freedom you seek, live by yourself in a forest
DevilBoyVex 2 months ago
@DevilBoyVex If someone pays their taxes, they are contributing all that is legally required of them. If someone pays their taxes they are living by the social contract required by the state. If they monetarily contribute what they can to the government which provides services for the public good, it is not my business what they do in their spare time.
icomewithfries 2 months ago
@DevilBoyVex Regardless of how cruel it is to abandon your family and friends, through suicide, drug abuse, moving to live in a forest or whatever, forcing people to live a life that will benefit everyone around them is not something that I would approve of. I know that people like you have only the best intentions for society as a whole, however I do not believe that forcing people to do things for the greater good is morally right either.
icomewithfries 2 months ago
@DevilBoyVex People should have the right to harm themselves in whatever way they chose. I believe that direct and intentionally indirect physical harm (murder, rape, , negligence, ect.) and intentional emotional harm (bullying, teasing, ect.) should be illegal. However regulating unintentional emotional harm goes beyond reasonable limits. Unintentionally harming others by harming yourself isn't a good thing, but by regulating it we enter a totalitarian style of government.
icomewithfries 2 months ago
@DevilBoyVex Going along with the reasoning behind suicide being illegal, the following things should also be illegal: actions that will lead to an early death (smoking tobacco, being obese), needlessly risking your life for thrills (skydiving, rock climbing), divorce (think of the children!), and alcoholism (think of the families!). By restraining what a person can do with their own body because it might emotionally hurt others is based on good intentions, but will take away basic freedoms.
icomewithfries 2 months ago
@DevilBoyVex Speaking of the societal harm of drugs, the war on drugs has caused more emotional harm than the drugs themselves have, in my opinion. What kind of emotional harm have the deaths of 40,000 innocent Mexicans caused? How about a 12 year old kid who joined a violent gang because illegally selling drugs allowed him to make easy cash? How about the thousands of people who's career dreams were ruined by a non-violent drug charge? These are not isolated events, they happen every day.
icomewithfries 2 months ago
@DevilBoyVex Sorry for the rant, it's just I strongly believe drugs are a medical issue, not a criminal justice one. Prison is not going to stop the supply or demand for drugs, and they are just as easy to get in prison by the way. The only way to stop people from abusing them is through support and help, not punishment. Legalizing drugs stops almost all the violence associated with drugs, no more gangs or drug cartels. It also allows the addicts to ask for help without fear of punishment. :D
icomewithfries 2 months ago
@DevilBoyVex
LOL! The truth finally comes out. This guy truly believes that he owes his life and his freedoms to the state. No one need take this discussion any further. It is now perfectly clear where all his other ideas stem from. Sadly, I am not surprised.
YewTube2025 1 month ago
@DevilBoyVex
Your solution to murder and death from drug usage is to murder all the citizens in countries that produce drugs? LOL! You are officially passed the point of no return in your downward spiral into delusional oblivion and away from any rational or reasonable debate.
YewTube2025 1 month ago
@DevilBoyVex
"Almost all abuse cases are because the father of the house is a alcoholic"
No. This is false. What is true, is that 100% of abuse cases are because the abuser has a problem with violence. You are using drugs as an excuse to ignore the real causes of violence and the real solutions that can come from alleviating ourselves of the ignorant idea that drugs are the cause of drug abuse. This is like saying that you can prevent suicide by outlawing razor blades and Valium.
YewTube2025 1 month ago
@DevilBoyVex
Making decisions based solely on the incorrect information you are told by other ignorant people who don't know what they are talking about is your right as an American. Please don't impose your shallow uneducated views which have no basis in fact, history or reality on the rest of us.
The truth is Alcohol is bad for you and prohibition doesn't work.
YewTube2025 1 month ago
@MichelinDUD I disagree not everyone can get weed. I would say most people do not know where to get weed. Break it down percentage wise by age groups and classification of people. There are a lot of people who don't live in big cities and have no access to any dealers. You telling someone in little town Ohio can get weed? If it was legal, you can get weed in any city, any town, any place in the United States through regular stores. Distribution will be up, production up, profits up.
DevilBoyVex 2 months ago
@DevilBoyVex
Yes. Everyone can get weed everywhere. The fact that you are ignorant to this reality may have a lot to do with all of your other sheltered and naive views on society.
YewTube2025 1 month ago
@DevilBoyVex
So you aren't against the consumption of cocaine. You are only against profiting legitimately off the sale of cocaine?
YewTube2025 1 month ago
@MichelinDUD You don't think there is a bigger revenue that comes out of the alcohol industry after prohibition ended? It's about the expansion of your customer base. Ron Paul doesn't think more people will use heroin if it was legal? Back during prohibition only 5% or less of people drank alcohol (which is a deadly drug that kills thousands of people a year) and now roughly 99 percent of all people have had alcohol at some point in their lives. Roughly 20% drink it consistently.
DevilBoyVex 2 months ago
@DevilBoyVex
Unfortunately, reality and history do not support the "facts" you claim. All prohibition did was take alcohol usage off the books, where it increased & festered into political corruption and judicial inefficiency. Prohibition gave rise to the one of the biggest national crime waves in the history of our country, and it immediately transferred power from voters to gangsters. It's easy to understand why you hold the positions you do, seeing as to how incorrect you are about history
YewTube2025 1 month ago
@DevilBoyVex
Gangsters went out of the business of selling alcohol after prohibition. What you are saying is just simply untrue, unrealistic and down-right silly.
YewTube2025 1 month ago
@DevilBoyVex
Silly talk. Drug dealers don't make money because the overhead is so low. They make money because there is no competition or regulation against fraud in the black market. No one will pay a drug dealer for what they can get @ 7-11. You are just being silly now.
YewTube2025 1 month ago
@DevilBoyVex silly, you realize of course that drug dealers would not like ron paul, the whole point of legalizing drugs is that it would put petty drug dealers out of business right? people wouldn't have to buy stuff cut with rat poison, they could get it from the store, you get that right?
dannyjohansson 2 months ago
Comment removed
DevilBoyVex 2 months ago
@dannyjohansson Yeahhh so the drug dealers can open stores selling them, and most dealers are also users, I play a lot of online poker and I don't get taxed but I would rather have someone legalize online poker than have the DOJ go around shutting down sites. I'm sure full tilt (the drug dealer) would rather do their business out in the open. I'm not talking about some junkie selling on a street corner. I'm talking about dealers who monopolize the industry, the manufacturers. The big dealers.
DevilBoyVex 2 months ago
@DevilBoyVex
LOL! Did you just compare the owners of full tilt to a Mexican drug cartel? ROTFLMFAOOL!!!! Dude! You are on cocaine RIGHT NOW!!!
YewTube2025 1 month ago
@dannyjohansson You don't think the mass producers of cocaine who have to figure out illegal ways to transport the drugs into America every year would be happy if they could start doing business and import/export tons and tons of drugs without bribing officials and suffer huge risks of losing merchandise? You think of drug dealers as some guy who sells drugs on the street corner. I think of drug dealers as producers who have thousands of people working for them making cocaine.
DevilBoyVex 2 months ago
@DevilBoyVex
No offense, but this is pretty stupid. You have to be living under a rock not to see the fat cats attacking Ron Paul as though their lives depended on it.
Secondly, legalizing drugs would put every single drug dealer in the country out of business over night. Why would you risk your life and your freedom to pay a drug dealer twice as much for something you can walk down to Walmart and buy for half price or even get for free with your insurance card? Try to think things through.
YewTube2025 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey everyone! Just released a song this week that was taylor-made for the Ron Paul R3VOLUTION. You can find it on my channel under the "original music- studio recordings" playlist, or just search "paul trinca ron paul". Doing my best to spread his message!!
paultrincamusic 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
U HAVE TO BE A REGISTERED REPUBLICAN IN MOST STATES TO VOTE FOR RON PAUL IN THE PRIMARY ELECTION WHICH IS IMPORTANT + U NEED 2 DO ASAP! GET HELP CHANGING PARTY AT BLUEREPUBLICAN. . U HAVE ONLY UP TO 12 WEEKS BEFORE PRIMARY CONVENTION IN SOME STATES!! HE NEEDS 2 WIN THE PRIMARY ELECTION IN ORDER TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT IN THE GENERAL ELECTION. COPY/PASTE + SHARE EVERYWHERE!! RONPAUL2012!
xXBCARLXx 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This event lists all the Ron Paul events going on in december and is a collective effort to give Ron Paul a push, and make sure he wins: Go to facebook and look up the event PUSH FOR PAUL DECEMBER BOMB! ALL ARE WELCOME!!!! GO LIBERTY!!!!!
hellomynamesemina 2 months ago
is that which is epic as such because it is declared or is it just known?
meme factory b/rothers should try doing the right thing.
with moar picz kthx
willzwhale 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SHOCKING VIDEO:
"Obama QUITTING in 2012!"
CLICK ObamaSnippets
ObamaSnippets 2 months ago in playlist More videos from RonPaul2008dotcom
i remember when times were hard at work due the the weather and went a week or two without pay..
nickiz1 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
•
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
It's not enough to say "Vote Ron Paul"
In order for Dr.Paul to win, HE NEEDS THE PRIMARY. That's the toughest part.
IF YOU WANT TO VOTE IN PRIMARY YOU HAVE TO BE REGISTERED REPUBLICAN! If you don't switch parties in time, (3 months ahead in some states from now) YOU WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO VOTE!!
Go to BLUEREPUBLICAN(dot)ORG and register ASAP! Copy and paste this everywhere! Thumbs up to help this be on top.
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
conwaycrackergmail 2 months ago 3
:D Cool looking toons. Who drew them?
RecklessX9 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
- WARNING DO NOT UPDATE THE LAST YOUTUBE VERSION - because it doesnt have friend invite and do not have channel views - This is a move for not allowing the public to see that your channel has much more views than others and also a move to not allow you have more friends on your list or communicate with people - They are trying to manipulate public opinion with this move to not allow people organize against immoral and warmonger governments with world record of debts..
luisbeck007 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It is not enough to say OK, you're right, I will vote for Ron Paul. You have to get some one else to Vote Ron Paul. Both political parties are bought and paid for by the establishment that want everything you have and that have a ton of money to donate. You will hear the words "Oh but they will never let him be elected"
The THEY is YOU. You are the 99%. You have 99% of the vote. Only you can defeat Ron Paul. Take a friend to your republican primary and vote. It's the only hope you have.
zinger1010 2 months ago
Great video! Ron Paul is the only HONEST candidate. He never waivers and is a true hero of the Republic. He's the only one who can save our personal liberty. They can kill many of us but they cannot kill an idea whose time has come. Whatever happens, we will NEVER NEVER NEVER give up the quest for FREEDOM against tyranny. We will win and we march on and on and on for LIBERTY!
WiseOneNoDrugs 2 months ago
If we keep electing crooked, underhanded liars into office, we'll just keep getting more Bush's and Obama's....we have to go for the good candidate if we want any hope at all of saving our freedom and our country. Vote Ron Paul
originalfizixx 2 months ago
The only reason I didn't vote for Ron Paul during the 2008 election is because he pulled out days before - asking for everyone to vote for other third party candidates. I voted for Ralph Nader (also a bad-ass). This time I will still probably reserve my vote for Ron Paul. Do not for for the lesser of two evils. If you vote for a Republican or a Democrat you're really just deciding whether you want to get stabbed in the belly or the back.
Exciting times.
Kucinich, Nader, Paul!
XD
bobbygnosis 2 months ago
@bobbygnosis
no... it's because the media largely ignored him in 2008 AS WELL! 95% of the media concentrated on McCains name, instead of Ron Paul, who largely had the supreme number of votes than any of the other REp. candidates.
It was RON PAUL who should of been the Rep. front runner in '08, not stupid McCain (who's presidency would have been just as bad as Obama's)
Eye2EyeIIIV 2 months ago
@Eye2EyeIIIV IT doesn't matter what the propaganda machine tells you to think. You know what's real and you decide what you think is important. You're on the right path. I can tell. Try not to get too down on others for not getting up to speed too fast. Remember that you were once just as ignorant as they were. I only say that because I get impatient too.
Anyway, try to help out as much as possible. These days we'll need a lot of cool heads and calm words. Peace and love, bro.
bobbygnosis 2 months ago
@bobbygnosis
i kinda get what u mean, but ignorance is the last thing on my list
Eye2EyeIIIV 2 months ago
'Spreading democracy' is a noble idea. IF - and it's a big 'if' - the people are asking for intervention. In the case of Libya, rebels were being massacred and were requesting assistance to level the playing field. Obama offered reasonable, measured assistance and handed over control to other nations. Is that imperialism? I don't think so.
The fact that the Libyan mob shamelessly desecrated Gaddafi's corpse is irrelevant.
No strong nation should ignore the cries of the weak.
louthegiantcookie 2 months ago
The FSB today: a letter sent to Putin by Japanese PM Noda contains a warning that US President Barack Obama has issued an executive-level “kill order” against Congressman Ron Paul over fears this charismatic politician is about to expose to all Americans what can only be described as the largest mass theft in human history. The “kill order” is a metaphor for silencing down congressman Ron Paul in the mass media as if he doesn’t exist.
globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=27980
trashmail8 2 months ago
Cont -Did you see these shitheads out in the streets protesting when Bush was launching trillion dollar wars, operating gulags, and wiretapping US citizens. It was common knowledge what Bush was doing. Enter Obama and the douchebags woke up - Take to the streets patriots!!! Too late libertarians - your new found outrage when Obama was in office exposes your real motivations. Whitey is slipping - I want my country back, founding fathers, wah wah wah wah!!!!!!!!
scouser691 2 months ago
@scouser691 we actually were protesting back during Bush era...it took a while for the rest to catch up
JoeyPencils 2 months ago
@JoeyPencils - It was liberals and lefties who were out in the streets protesting against Bush. If Ron Paul had any principles he would not be running for the nomination of the party that gave us Bush and the neocons.
scouser691 2 months ago
Republicans wanna take us back 60-70 years when they think homosexuality didn't exist and blacks and women knew their place. Libertarians wanna take us back 200 years to a fantasy land where "the people" had power. I have alway believed that the vast majority of libertarians are pissed of white people who are scared shitless about the demographic changes happening in Ameica.
scouser691 2 months ago
@scouser691 whaddaya think bout what we said, that we'd love to have Paul win the nom. cause then there'd be 1) someone to attack Obama's militarism and support of wall street, and 2) a bright light shown straight into the holes of libertarian free trade "logic."
OccupyIdeas 2 months ago
@OccupyIdeas - Love ron paul on foreign affair issues. It's what he would domestically that is terrifying. Like i said earlier - libertarian efforts to neuter government would be tantamount to removing referees from the nfl. Game would be destroyed quickly. Likewise, wiping out government regulation basically tells corporatations and super wealthy that there are no rules. I'd like to ask a libertarian which nation in human history he can point to as a succesful model for such a system
scouser691 2 months ago
@scouser691 i dislike Obama because of his actions just like i dislike Bush because of his actions. If you want to make it about race, that is your issue but perhaps back to back "worst. presidents. ever" are creating these protests. and perhaps, until we get a president with actual values these protests will continue...
shilelea 2 months ago
@shilelea - Couple of quick question -Where was the tea party when Bush was in office and launching trillion dollar wars against nations that never attacked us. Where was the tea party when Bush was operating gulags and torturing enemy fighters?
scouser691 2 months ago
@scouser691 the tea party movement didnt start til after Obama was elected. However, it wasn't formed ONLY because Obama is a shitty president, it was formed because the last 6 elections had produced primarily cookie cutter presidents with no real difference in policy. Obama's policy which is touted as change from Bush simply isn't. he has spread Bushes wars and still hasn't shut down Gitmo. To call racial discrimination and then tout Bush's failures is very ignorant.
shilelea 2 months ago
@shilelea - Kinda proved my point there then didn't you. If the tea party stands against neocon wars, massice deficits, gulags and torture and wiretapping then Bush was the poster boy for all these - So where were these people during the bush years - Deadly silent. The hypocrisy is breathtaking
scouser691 2 months ago
@scouser691 first of all many people were vocal during Bush's presidency, just because they didn't have an organization doesn't mean they were silent. Second you fail to address that Obama is the same person that Bush is tilted a little more socialist and a little less fascist. most tea party people if you would just talk to them view Obama as a continuation of Bush and a representation of a Two party Failure.
shilelea 2 months ago
@shilelea - Yeah many people were vocal during the Bush presidency - They were called liberals and lefties. Not a peep from Libertarian/tea party crowd. Like I said - These tea partiers are conservative republicans and vast majority voted for Bush. Never voted for Obama mate. I admit I preferred him over Bush (No Brainer)
scouser691 2 months ago
@shilelea - Ron Paul is running for the nomination of the party that brought us the necon wars. Most libertarians are right wing conservatives, most voted for Bush. Now Ron Paul is their man. Be very fucking afraid
scouser691 2 months ago