Wow, a rocket launcher with idiot proof instructions. I wonder if it started with "Thank you for choosing the panzerfaust for your anti-tank needs, we hope that you find it satisfactory and hope you enjoy your use of it."
@Th3UnD3TaK3r Although the pineapple generally has less range it has other numerous advantages. For one, it is safer. The fuse mechanism does not ignite untill the spoon is released (which inturn is set in place by the pin). Whereas the stickgrenades fuse ignites when the cord is pulled. Secondly, stick grenades have to be prepared before combat (stick fuse + charge head were transported seperatly), whereas pineapple grenades are immidiatly good to go and also more compact.
@Th3UnD3TaK3r I think it had to do with their size, since smaller grenades were easier to carry and more convenient to use in urban combat (where hand grenades are primarily used.) Also, if you look up German weapons in WW2, they used a large variety of grenades, from your typical M24 stick grenade, to the Egg grenade, can grenade, and even the M43 stick grenade, which could be either a stick grenade or cylindrical hand grenade.
@ossian108 yeah, but even that had only a good gun, i dont know if they changed the armor. so superior is a bit too much. the pershing was good, but only a few have seen combat. but they meant superior tank-forces (iin numbers, fuel, spareparts) anyway i think, so that might be true^^
@xx0MangiPogo0xx It was actually based on the bazooka, but was also superior in almost every way (penentration, range, accuracy though much heavier, but it was a crew served weapon. The gunner and the loader)
@1048luca maybe they meant superior over earlier models of allied tanks. and maybe some german too. allied usually includes russia too, IS-2 tanks and late T-34 were pretty good. and consider that the german tank force by 1945 was outdated. only a small number were tiger I - II or panther. ofcourse that doesn't explain why they show a picture of a sherman
@evildeathmonkey1 Late model PZ 4´s were actually about equal to t-34/85´s (lets say it like this: The PZ 4 could kill the t-34/85 at 1,5 km and the t-34/85 could do the same, but less effectively, because of uncomfartable interior and rather poor sights. The Shermans were weak, hence "Tommy Cooker", and the IS-2 was very rare), and Panther´s were actually in equal number to PZ 4´s in "44". ´The STUG III was actually the most numerous by this time
3:35 "Rakatanpanzerbusch" - worst pronunciation ever made.
tubewatcher77 2 days ago
Not impressed with the narrator's professionalism... he should have taken advice on his German pronunciation.
bnipmnaa 1 week ago
Rackettenpanserbusch... lol
gekko434 1 month ago
surperior models of allied tanks?
the sherman? XD
it should be surperior masses of tanks
not surperior tanks
-.-
TheLordZhufor 2 months ago 24
@TheLordZhufor I think hes refering to russian thick armor tanks
VSCOMO 1 month ago
@TheLordZhufor the M-26 heavy pershing tank with a 90mm gun
jhnb12876 6 days ago
@jhnb12876 Pershing tanks ran horribly.
MrBlindcat1 1 day ago
Comment removed
Suomipanzerdiv13 2 months ago
Wow, a rocket launcher with idiot proof instructions. I wonder if it started with "Thank you for choosing the panzerfaust for your anti-tank needs, we hope that you find it satisfactory and hope you enjoy your use of it."
Hotshotter3000 2 months ago 11
I am the 22,222th viewer of this clip!
arashfoxy 2 months ago in playlist WW2 German infantery tactics
oh, so that's y it's the egg one not in CoD, JK i NOE!
CNX625 3 months ago
why is the stick grenade design not used anymore today, if it had a higher range than the pineapplegrenade?
Th3UnD3TaK3r 4 months ago
@Th3UnD3TaK3r Although the pineapple generally has less range it has other numerous advantages. For one, it is safer. The fuse mechanism does not ignite untill the spoon is released (which inturn is set in place by the pin). Whereas the stickgrenades fuse ignites when the cord is pulled. Secondly, stick grenades have to be prepared before combat (stick fuse + charge head were transported seperatly), whereas pineapple grenades are immidiatly good to go and also more compact.
556Smiley 4 months ago
@556Smiley Thank you for responding :-)
Th3UnD3TaK3r 4 months ago
@556Smiley That last point is only true of M24 stick grenades.
John234pwns 3 months ago
@Th3UnD3TaK3r I think it had to do with their size, since smaller grenades were easier to carry and more convenient to use in urban combat (where hand grenades are primarily used.) Also, if you look up German weapons in WW2, they used a large variety of grenades, from your typical M24 stick grenade, to the Egg grenade, can grenade, and even the M43 stick grenade, which could be either a stick grenade or cylindrical hand grenade.
John234pwns 3 months ago
I like how accurate to this red orchestra 2 is.
MrDreamblade 4 months ago
in HEROES OF STALINGRAD, new pc game by TWI, check it out.
When you kill a german who has primed a sticknade and is about to throw it you see him fumble it into the air and then seconds later KABOOM
BFinFlavin 4 months ago
@BFinFlavin The Germans were the heroes of Stalingrad. And you are displaying a textbook case of "schadenfreude"
EoSoAllah 1 week ago
The German stick grenade was about the size of my cock. Well, the pin at least...
madhammudeux 5 months ago 2
the pronounciation of "Raketenbanzerbüchse" hurts my ears...
DonStelz92 5 months ago
Comment removed
hitmonlee00 5 months ago
@hitmonlee00 You are looking through your ears?
DonStelz92 5 months ago
I love watching this then go play Flames of war.
ThePooppantsman 5 months ago
ITS A TRAP!!
MrAapenkind 6 months ago
lol allied and russian forces. Russians aren't allies? Shouldn't have been...
Poopdeckswabber 6 months ago
Blinder Grenades=Tank Blinding Grenade
haiherosner 6 months ago
scary scary shit
Chrish2213UK 6 months ago
Dimitri, use the panzerschreck & destroye this tank
MsCasper2010 9 months ago
Comment removed
MsCasper2010 9 months ago
The panzerfaust seems rather like a russian concept, not german: cheap, simple, realiable and effective.
VRichardsn 9 months ago
superior modells of allied tanks? a sherman? good joke!
1509Freeze 11 months ago
@1509Freeze Perhaps they meant the Fireflies and similar.
ossian108 8 months ago
@ossian108 yeah, but even that had only a good gun, i dont know if they changed the armor. so superior is a bit too much. the pershing was good, but only a few have seen combat. but they meant superior tank-forces (iin numbers, fuel, spareparts) anyway i think, so that might be true^^
1509Freeze 8 months ago
the little CD granade is called discuss granade!!-.-
xx0MangiPogo0xx 11 months ago
and and the panzerschreck was not a copy of the bazzuka
xx0MangiPogo0xx 11 months ago
@xx0MangiPogo0xx It was actually based on the bazooka, but was also superior in almost every way (penentration, range, accuracy though much heavier, but it was a crew served weapon. The gunner and the loader)
hjorturerlend 10 months ago
and aigain crap!!the panzerschreck was developped before the panzerfaust!!!!!-.-
xx0MangiPogo0xx 11 months ago
05:43 People knew when to stay away......mostly.
TheIcelandicPatriot 1 year ago
09:00 Anti-tank chicken the weapon so classified youve never heard of it or thought of it
ANZACJugger0 1 year ago 2
Panzerfaust is probably the best close range anti-tank concept in the second world war.
aaKonda 1 year ago
he forgot to say numbers he meant superior numbers.
the russians had way better tanks than US and Britain.
Lemgardandre 1 year ago
(02:40) - The Germans were faced by superior models of allied tanks? Which ones?
1048luca 1 year ago
@1048luca maybe they meant superior over earlier models of allied tanks. and maybe some german too. allied usually includes russia too, IS-2 tanks and late T-34 were pretty good. and consider that the german tank force by 1945 was outdated. only a small number were tiger I - II or panther. ofcourse that doesn't explain why they show a picture of a sherman
evildeathmonkey1 1 year ago
@evildeathmonkey1 Late model PZ 4´s were actually about equal to t-34/85´s (lets say it like this: The PZ 4 could kill the t-34/85 at 1,5 km and the t-34/85 could do the same, but less effectively, because of uncomfartable interior and rather poor sights. The Shermans were weak, hence "Tommy Cooker", and the IS-2 was very rare), and Panther´s were actually in equal number to PZ 4´s in "44". ´The STUG III was actually the most numerous by this time
hjorturerlend 10 months ago
Lol! As the narrator says "superior allied tank models" they show a sherman, that is massproduced, sensetive tincans which cant stand up to shit.
Suomipanzerdiv13 1 year ago 2
the narrator really should learn how to say the german names properly. almost everything on "raketenpanzerbüchse" was wrong
BlackBlade1986 1 year ago
Cardboard panzerfausts? never heard of it!
Suomipanzerdiv13 2 years ago
i love how the "historian" keeps correcting himself... "to that effect" or " stay away of the back... generaly" lol
DerKast 2 years ago 2