Why fuck-up a great video by uploading stupid-ass background music when we, the viewing audience prefer to listen to the actual flight sounds. Makes no sense.
Guys calm down. This is maybe a Su33 with the external look of a F-14 (MOD) but landing in Lock On isn't that easwy anyway on a carrier. Despite of that he is not using realistic settings. That "F-14" crashlanded :) Want a realistic F-14 and a carrier - look at "Dino Cattaneo's" site for FSX!
@WanderfalkeAT Thy for the answer. I wrote a thousand time that it wasz one of my first carrier landing and your comment is cool, because I'm a bit tired with the others
No kidding - wish you couch potato tough guys would mention it's just a video game. Annoying as hell when looking for the real thing. Essentially you are lying. It's not an F14, it's not a carrier and it's not a landing. All you did is push some buttons at home while sitting on your couch. Not impressive.
@beserker5 Then you do it, and tell me how easy it is. it's actually extremely difficult to do this, and dont call flight simulators games. because they are not that different from what real combat pilots use to train themselves, maybe not lockon. But deffinetly a advanced version of Falcon 4.0. which is a combat flight simulation.
I wish you people who post your video games would mention that in the title. Annoying as hell when looking for the real thing and keep getting these stupid games.
Hmmmmm seems like there are a boatload of wannabees here on Youtube.
At the speed that simulation was runnig a 5yo could have landed it. Try it in rain and fog and a pitching deck at speed. Beats the hell out of any sim out there
I am, SEL fixed-wing and SEL rotor. I've never been in an F-14. My comment was simply speaking to the huge difference between a simulator and the real thing. As accurate as the physics may be, it will never match what you feel and how you react to situations when you're the pilot of real aircraft.
Well here - Lock on doesn't have flyable F-14, but you can make ai to land F-14 to a carrier and watch it from outside.
Looking from inside (thru HUD), it's acctualy Su-33 landing on a Russian carrier. Now, either this player had some patch to combine the F-14 (outside look) with the acctualy flyable Su-33 OR it's simply edited F-14 landing by cpu and Su-33 landing by player and put together to apear as one thing. Nice vid in any case!
Lockon is a very deep shit !... You have to mod it to have a real in game exp... And LO don't use you graphics card and just use your processor,... IN fact, as soon as a new real combat flight sim is availab le, I move to it. Eagles Dynamics are just russians vampires
it was good, untill 1:33 you hit the round out, then that goes agianst all carrier safety protocol, never ever land before the first wire, its not good, nor cool
Alphayear stands corrected, I agree it's an F-14. What threw me is the opening introductory screen that showed a cameo image of what looked like an F-18 because the vertical stabilizers had that V-shape. and the F-14's are straight up. Sorry. I didn't mean to look stupid. My bad.
You have to choose a carrierable aircraft, the Su-33 is the one and only by default in LO. If you want to perform carrier landing with another plane, you have to use a mod whichi will replace the Su-33 by another 3D model.
Notice that you have to press ctrl+G to get the arrest hook.
well to me u crashed at back of boat, u need to go in a lil bit more so u have a good landing, NEVER catch the first wire unless u have to, always go for the second or third if nessesary.
why should he go for the 2nd wire the f14 pilots used to try and catch the fourth wire to either impress the deck crew or win a bet with the deck crew
Ehh..next time focus on that "meatball". Keep it green and your altitude correct and you should be good to go. Since you are using the Su33, the ILS will only get you so far. About 1/2 of a mile throw that shit out the window and use your eyes.
In this case you came in too "flat" and too fast. Your HUD read 280 I believe, which could've been reduced greatly. Once you get your speed lowered, nose up and keep fluttering the power. Go full burners when you hit the deck, try for 3 wire.
No..it's not okay. First off, you aim for the third wire, not the second. Catch the first and you'll be speaking to the LSO afterward, probably the admiral if it's happened before. Catch the first wire and you're close to crashing a 40 million dollar plane into the back of a boat.
I was replying to someone else saying that catching the first wire is okay if you live..
I know it's a game, I lead an F-14 squadron in it and we practice these landings all the time. Half the stuff that happens we would be dead. Likewise, half the stuff that we crash during shouldn't be so deadly. It's a fun game, keep at it.
Hey maxwelbr just a question here, does the brass frown upon pilots trapping the FIRST wire when landing I mean if you have the skills to do it without killing yourself and your WSO then why not. just a question I wasnt sure.
As the saying goes, any landing you walk away from is a good landing, but if you're baggin 1-wire traps consistantly you're askin for trouble. The higher-ups will take notice and make sure you get your stuff together because its very risky bussiness .
The end of the carrier is not far from that first wire and if you're putting your hook, at best, right on the 1 wire, your rear gear is planting down not far from there. Theres very little room for error on a 1-wire trap.
When did I say mph? Of course I know landing at 300-400 is super fast. The Su-33 Heads Up Display shows speed in Kph. Thats why I said 300-400. Next time do a conversion between mph and kph. And dont start a fight over here with me, kid.
Viper7662, 300-400 kph is 162-215 knots. i KNOW you don't think a Tomcat is supposed to land at that speed. What the hell does the SU-33's HUD indication of speed have to do with anything? Word of advice, Mr. "virtual tomcatter": refer to aircraft speed in knots, not mph. That way you won't sound like a know-nothing, painfully-obvious-that-you're-not-a-pilot dumbass, which you are by the way. Oh and don't tell someone "don't start a fight over here with me" by starting a fight yourself... kid
El terrible. Approach high at a speed of only 200 knots....thats coming in with no landing speed, you are just stalling. You need to be atleast 300-400. Come fly with us... Virtual VF-31 Tomcatters, we will show you hand to land. ;)
Thx for the offer :) That's sweet. Why not ? Yiou can reach me by MP . IN fact this film is one of my first on LO and I was a beginner at this time :)
no i wrote you because i thought it would be fun....when you are you going to be reality instead of a wanna-be? i dont know where you get to thinking that 300-400 is the right speed to land an aircraft...your dead wrong and out of your mind if your landing an aircraft that fast
wouldn't it be funny if a SU-33 accidentally landed on a american carrier....he'd be like.....wrong ship comrades...im goin in for a touch n go...but it never will they would blow it out of the sky before it came within 50 miles
That actually almost happened once during WWII, when carriers were really new. A Japanese flight tried to land on an American carrier and no one noticed except the skipper on one battleship who opened fire on them. An Admiral radioed him to stop firing on friendly aircraft, but when the fleet turned their lights on the aircraft, they realized that they were, in fact, Zeros and all the guns opened up, but the flight scattered.
Of course, this could never happen now, since we have radar.
Grandma's hands used to issue out a warning, she'd say "Billy, don't you run so fast! Might fall on a piece of glass, might be snakes there in that grass!"
Why fuck-up a great video by uploading stupid-ass background music when we, the viewing audience prefer to listen to the actual flight sounds. Makes no sense.
danolson68 1 year ago
i never realized it until now...that's the song that blackstreet sampled in "no diggity".
Markduderino 1 year ago
Guys calm down. This is maybe a Su33 with the external look of a F-14 (MOD) but landing in Lock On isn't that easwy anyway on a carrier. Despite of that he is not using realistic settings. That "F-14" crashlanded :) Want a realistic F-14 and a carrier - look at "Dino Cattaneo's" site for FSX!
WanderfalkeAT 1 year ago
@WanderfalkeAT Thy for the answer. I wrote a thousand time that it wasz one of my first carrier landing and your comment is cool, because I'm a bit tired with the others
Lothamroth288 1 year ago
@WanderfalkeAT Actually is not an Su'33 with F'14 external look. I think the MOD is an F'14 with su'33 cockpit.
gargoloso 1 year ago
No kidding - wish you couch potato tough guys would mention it's just a video game. Annoying as hell when looking for the real thing. Essentially you are lying. It's not an F14, it's not a carrier and it's not a landing. All you did is push some buttons at home while sitting on your couch. Not impressive.
beserker5 1 year ago 4
@beserker5 Then you do it, and tell me how easy it is. it's actually extremely difficult to do this, and dont call flight simulators games. because they are not that different from what real combat pilots use to train themselves, maybe not lockon. But deffinetly a advanced version of Falcon 4.0. which is a combat flight simulation.
Jake50754 1 year ago
I wish you people who post your video games would mention that in the title. Annoying as hell when looking for the real thing and keep getting these stupid games.
beserker5 1 year ago 2
stupid video game wanabe. you have 0
cypris2002 1 year ago
Too short caught the first wire, not a good landing. Any pitch on the deck and might not have made it, D landing
chrisghs15 1 year ago
Hmmmmm seems like there are a boatload of wannabees here on Youtube.
At the speed that simulation was runnig a 5yo could have landed it. Try it in rain and fog and a pitching deck at speed. Beats the hell out of any sim out there
Tomcat101alum 2 years ago
I worked airframes on Tomcats and can tell you with 100% accuracy that is not a Tomcat windscreen.
vf74tomcat 2 years ago
yeap its a su-33 :)
c3rveja 1 year ago
awesome!!!!
Juancboy22 2 years ago
The sim is Lock On and the plane he's flying is a Su-33, though he's using a F-14 skin. Cockpit is still Su-33.
langhammars 2 years ago 3
Yep, I should
Lothamroth288 2 years ago
thats not an f-14 cockpit
lightswitch94 2 years ago
No? really ???? Hoiw have you figure that out ?... Damn, you must be a very good pilot.... lol²
Lothamroth288 2 years ago
the f-14 has a different windscreen than the one in the video. its obviously a russain aircraft cockpit.
lightswitch94 2 years ago
IS THIS GAME LOCK ON
MASTERMARK360 2 years ago
yes it is
Lothamroth288 2 years ago
its not exactly a video game its a simulator.... wich is what the pilots learn how to fly -.-
zeejenkins 2 years ago
Actually, you learn how to fly by getting into an actual plane, not sitting on the ground in a sim. They're fun but nothing like the real deal. ;)
trloyalist 2 years ago
I love it when people think they're experienced enough to talk about things like this from playing sims.
CynicalVision 2 years ago
someone here is pilot in real life ?
...
c3rveja 1 year ago
I am, SEL fixed-wing and SEL rotor. I've never been in an F-14. My comment was simply speaking to the huge difference between a simulator and the real thing. As accurate as the physics may be, it will never match what you feel and how you react to situations when you're the pilot of real aircraft.
trloyalist 1 year ago
I agree ofc! but whats matter ? Its a game, for fun!
In falcon 4 the "avionique" (?) is same than F-16! for the rest, its a game...
c3rveja 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
waste of time. get a life
Harlingtonjnr3 2 years ago
And yea.. It's kinda funny to hear russian instructions while watching f14 landing :))
Now either there's someone screwing with the pilot in the carrier tower or the russians fucking stole the f14 - lol
;)
shutmeup81 2 years ago
Lol!
So many ppl here fighting what plane it is... :))
Well here - Lock on doesn't have flyable F-14, but you can make ai to land F-14 to a carrier and watch it from outside.
Looking from inside (thru HUD), it's acctualy Su-33 landing on a Russian carrier. Now, either this player had some patch to combine the F-14 (outside look) with the acctualy flyable Su-33 OR it's simply edited F-14 landing by cpu and Su-33 landing by player and put together to apear as one thing. Nice vid in any case!
shutmeup81 2 years ago
lockon is NOT what i expected. 1 star.
funkee05 2 years ago
Lockon is a very deep shit !... You have to mod it to have a real in game exp... And LO don't use you graphics card and just use your processor,... IN fact, as soon as a new real combat flight sim is availab le, I move to it. Eagles Dynamics are just russians vampires
Lothamroth288 2 years ago
Try Falcon 4.0. Only the F15 is flyable, but it's for real. 800 page instruction manual.
rtrThanos 2 years ago
lomac sucks balls in regarding to cockpit F-14 with a Su cockpit ..to throw up...
other then that great landing :D
claudgin 2 years ago
it was good, untill 1:33 you hit the round out, then that goes agianst all carrier safety protocol, never ever land before the first wire, its not good, nor cool
surfman62495 2 years ago
I know dude, almost 100 person told that since the video is online. It was my first night carrier landing
Lothamroth288 2 years ago
Alphayear stands corrected, I agree it's an F-14. What threw me is the opening introductory screen that showed a cameo image of what looked like an F-18 because the vertical stabilizers had that V-shape. and the F-14's are straight up. Sorry. I didn't mean to look stupid. My bad.
alphayear 2 years ago
its actually an outline of an f22 raptor
GLSM5000 2 years ago
I like the music, but the video is from
some game ... Get a life !
Dogfish1960 2 years ago
Who gives a shit. Its a video game not a real plane!
soundlogics 2 years ago
Ok, I stand corrected, but at first the video looked like the horizontal stabilizers had a V-shape like the F-18. Sorry I created such a ruckus.
alphayear 2 years ago
No, It's an FA-18. YOU learnYOUR stuff.
alphayear 2 years ago
f-14 ;)
Viper77GER 2 years ago
F14 Tomcat
TopGunPilot01 2 years ago
F-18's wings don't fold.
It's an F-14.
End of story.
RoundenBrown 2 years ago
Sure they do... once :)
ezae 2 years ago
stuoid its an F-14
MassTube8 2 years ago
Evidently you don't know the difference between an F-14 and an FA-18. That's an FA-18 in the video.
alphayear 2 years ago
No, it's an F14. Learn your stuff.
TonyDog360 2 years ago
F14 Tomcat
TopGunPilot01 2 years ago
Hi Dude, nice vidéo ! could I know the name of the song and which camera view you use at 0:40 ? thanks !
aerolive91 2 years ago
why is the cockpit of Su?
Empty89037 2 years ago
Because there is not a modelled F-14 cockpit in LOMAC....yet.
Wags182494 2 years ago
What was that crap?
1 wire?
rmcdonal 3 years ago
falcon 4 rules
paulo19801980 3 years ago
fs2004 or fsx??
sniper11789 3 years ago
Lock-On modern Air Combat ;)
Lothamroth288 3 years ago
I have LOMAC and I didn't know you could land on a carrier...where is that option?
spencedogg17 2 years ago
You have to choose a carrierable aircraft, the Su-33 is the one and only by default in LO. If you want to perform carrier landing with another plane, you have to use a mod whichi will replace the Su-33 by another 3D model.
Notice that you have to press ctrl+G to get the arrest hook.
Lothamroth288 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
nerd!
meursault07 3 years ago
WTF?
Flegmatica 3 years ago 3
How do you even get to pilot an F-14 with Tail hook Function..On LOMAC
Brian0291 3 years ago
You put the F-14 model instead of the Su-33 model which is the only carrierable aircraft for LO
Lothamroth288 3 years ago
well to me u crashed at back of boat, u need to go in a lil bit more so u have a good landing, NEVER catch the first wire unless u have to, always go for the second or third if nessesary.
Extreme1567 3 years ago
lol,... just read the other 52 comments and you'll see your not the first to write that. So, I let you discover my answer in the precedent posts
Lothamroth288 3 years ago
hey this comment is mine, not someone else, i dont care if they wrote it already. This is MY thought and comment.
Extreme1567 3 years ago
why should he go for the 2nd wire the f14 pilots used to try and catch the fourth wire to either impress the deck crew or win a bet with the deck crew
airsoftboy1313 3 years ago
Ehh..next time focus on that "meatball". Keep it green and your altitude correct and you should be good to go. Since you are using the Su33, the ILS will only get you so far. About 1/2 of a mile throw that shit out the window and use your eyes.
In this case you came in too "flat" and too fast. Your HUD read 280 I believe, which could've been reduced greatly. Once you get your speed lowered, nose up and keep fluttering the power. Go full burners when you hit the deck, try for 3 wire.
maxwelbr 3 years ago
Last time I checked, you hit full military power on touchdown...but that could be different for F-14s.
sixSICsix2277 3 years ago
What software did you use... fs2004?
dsm314 3 years ago
Lock-On Modern Air COmbat + the Addon Flamong cliffs and a lot of mods ;)
Lothamroth288 3 years ago
what is the name of that song? Thanks.
arm900fj 3 years ago
The name of the song is Grand Ma's hands. I found it on a pvompilation called "Sampled",Virgtin, 2000.
Lothamroth288 3 years ago
landing was too short, your not supposed to get the #1 wire, aim for the #3 wire.
tophatter94 4 years ago
Thx for the com... i did not know that when I realeased this video. At this time, I had not the skills to realize a nice night carrier landing
Lothamroth288 4 years ago
Anyone know the name of the song and who's singing it ????????
remowil55 4 years ago
Never mind, it's Bill Withers, "Grandma's Hand."
remowil55 4 years ago
The song come from : Various Artists - Sampled vol.1 - 40 Soul Jazz Disco & Funk Originals, 2000, Virgin. I do not know the exact title.
Lothamroth288 4 years ago
you should NOT land at the back of the carrier
teooo 4 years ago
I'm pretty sure you are
SMDskata 4 years ago
You aim for the 2nd wire, but if you hit the
1st wire and live it's still okay.
greendaylover12345 4 years ago
yeah if you live it's still okay. especially in a flight simulation game. cuz man, when you die in those, it is not okay.
GoNavy311 4 years ago
No..it's not okay. First off, you aim for the third wire, not the second. Catch the first and you'll be speaking to the LSO afterward, probably the admiral if it's happened before. Catch the first wire and you're close to crashing a 40 million dollar plane into the back of a boat.
maxwelbr 3 years ago
Lol, ok Dad, I'll try to do my best next time ;) It's just a game, whern you crash, I promised, I didn't cost anything ,)
I was a total beginner on LO when I film this video. Anyway, your, comment is fun and welcome
Lothamroth288 3 years ago
I was replying to someone else saying that catching the first wire is okay if you live..
I know it's a game, I lead an F-14 squadron in it and we practice these landings all the time. Half the stuff that happens we would be dead. Likewise, half the stuff that we crash during shouldn't be so deadly. It's a fun game, keep at it.
maxwelbr 3 years ago
Hey maxwelbr just a question here, does the brass frown upon pilots trapping the FIRST wire when landing I mean if you have the skills to do it without killing yourself and your WSO then why not. just a question I wasnt sure.
gtstang1420 3 years ago
As the saying goes, any landing you walk away from is a good landing, but if you're baggin 1-wire traps consistantly you're askin for trouble. The higher-ups will take notice and make sure you get your stuff together because its very risky bussiness .
The end of the carrier is not far from that first wire and if you're putting your hook, at best, right on the 1 wire, your rear gear is planting down not far from there. Theres very little room for error on a 1-wire trap.
maxwelbr 3 years ago
#3 wire is a perfect grade and if you got the skills to hit the first wire you need to use those skills and hit the third.
atom2009 2 years ago
they tell you 2 wire I usually got the 3 or the 2 never the 1
Fighting31st 4 years ago
When did I say mph? Of course I know landing at 300-400 is super fast. The Su-33 Heads Up Display shows speed in Kph. Thats why I said 300-400. Next time do a conversion between mph and kph. And dont start a fight over here with me, kid.
Viper7662 4 years ago
Viper7662, 300-400 kph is 162-215 knots. i KNOW you don't think a Tomcat is supposed to land at that speed. What the hell does the SU-33's HUD indication of speed have to do with anything? Word of advice, Mr. "virtual tomcatter": refer to aircraft speed in knots, not mph. That way you won't sound like a know-nothing, painfully-obvious-that-you're-not-a-pilot dumbass, which you are by the way. Oh and don't tell someone "don't start a fight over here with me" by starting a fight yourself... kid
GoNavy311 4 years ago
LOL ok big shot. I'm a kid alright.
Viper7662 4 years ago
El terrible. Approach high at a speed of only 200 knots....thats coming in with no landing speed, you are just stalling. You need to be atleast 300-400. Come fly with us... Virtual VF-31 Tomcatters, we will show you hand to land. ;)
Viper7662 4 years ago
Thx for the offer :) That's sweet. Why not ? Yiou can reach me by MP . IN fact this film is one of my first on LO and I was a beginner at this time :)
Lothamroth288 4 years ago
your obviously a wanna-be
109PH 4 years ago
You talking to me? Ya I'm a wannabe alright....
Viper7662 4 years ago
no i wrote you because i thought it would be fun....when you are you going to be reality instead of a wanna-be? i dont know where you get to thinking that 300-400 is the right speed to land an aircraft...your dead wrong and out of your mind if your landing an aircraft that fast
109PH 4 years ago
the approach speed for a timcat is 140 knots....
navy241 4 years ago
you dont want to approach at that high of a speed. you wanna be about 130-150 knots when you touch down or youll rip the landing gear off
lightswitch94 2 years ago
like how the air traffic controllers speaking russian xD
rightwing03 4 years ago
what game is this?
mcdouglas234 4 years ago
Lock-On modern aircombat + Flaming cliffs addon + F-14 mod ;-))
A very great Air combat simulator ^_^
Lothamroth288 4 years ago
wouldn't it be funny if a SU-33 accidentally landed on a american carrier....he'd be like.....wrong ship comrades...im goin in for a touch n go...but it never will they would blow it out of the sky before it came within 50 miles
PlayerHater117 4 years ago
100 miles actually lol
navy241 4 years ago
That actually almost happened once during WWII, when carriers were really new. A Japanese flight tried to land on an American carrier and no one noticed except the skipper on one battleship who opened fire on them. An Admiral radioed him to stop firing on friendly aircraft, but when the fleet turned their lights on the aircraft, they realized that they were, in fact, Zeros and all the guns opened up, but the flight scattered.
Of course, this could never happen now, since we have radar.
sixSICsix2277 3 years ago
u mean iff (identafaction firend or foe)
sxgn56969 3 years ago
well, both, since IFF is part of radar. But yes, that's what I meant. Sorry, I was half asleep when I wrote that.
sixSICsix2277 3 years ago
If they were smart they'd have let the planes land.
Devast8ion 3 years ago
Yeah, I always thought that. ;)
sixSICsix2277 3 years ago
yep.. SU-33 cockpit. lol 1 wire
pelletuomas 4 years ago
Nice footage from LOMAC: too bad it's the Russian SU-33 Cockpit. Nice use of the mod though....
Cheers!
Toadster1969 4 years ago
nicely done!
gavin53uc 4 years ago
STUPID MUSIC
el9nene 4 years ago
Very stupid music, has nothing to do with what's going on.
Jet1954 4 years ago
Grandma's hands used to issue out a warning, she'd say "Billy, don't you run so fast! Might fall on a piece of glass, might be snakes there in that grass!"
But Billy grew up to fly fighter jets.
ccoraxfan 4 years ago
This game is so realistic i puke when i play it.
Grazydine 4 years ago
> He landed on the russian carrier.
Whaaaaat? When did we sell USS Carl Vinson to Russians?
bloodymario 4 years ago
aren't you supposed to go full throttle..
Sigrafix 4 years ago
yes, when you hit the deck.
robertmo 4 years ago
SWEET
mmdghr 4 years ago
wow nice .. looks real, great landing.
ar83s 4 years ago
Are there any desert campaigns for the F-14? Is the game pretty realistic?
Navyseal234 4 years ago
VERY.
KuostA 4 years ago
ok 1 wire
Where was the ball?
Sreybk 5 years ago
Ditto
Blue2Green 5 years ago
He landed on the russian carrier.
KuostA 4 years ago
Lock-On Modern Air COmbat - Ubisoft - Version 12.a ( Addon Flaming Cliffs)
Lothamroth288 5 years ago
Lock-On Modern Air COmbat - Ubisoft - Version 12.a ( Addon Flaming Cliffs) - More information on my youtube channel
Lothamroth288 5 years ago
what is the name of this game?
viniardenghi 5 years ago
This is a mod for LOMAC. Its not a real f-14 game. Hence the russian on the hud. :)
Russo017 4 years ago