Added: 4 years ago
From: alvingogi
Views: 30,883
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (24)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • it is common fact that these cars are prone to the rustage underneath. many a seller has tried to palm off an old mg with a car mat covering a hole in the bottom. nice

  • i like these and i really like this one

  • Very pretty car. Nice and clean, a lot of the extra bits and pieces removed (side trim, bumper overriders etc.)

  • british leyland mgb gt for sale cheap email me

  • I have just bought my first MGB GT 1976 and I'm so happy with it, everything inside and out is just perfect!!!

  • wow that sounds amazing!! i want an MGB so badly!!!

  • bigger wheels dont reduce the power you twat, it still has the same output

  • bigger wheels reduce the torque and power... mibby consider smaller ones...

  • Sorry if this is wrong but... wouldn't larger wheels improve torque due to increased tyre circumferance and travel for the same amount of engine rpm?

  • Kjollen,

    a wheel or cog that's half the size of another, larger, wheel or cog will spin twice as fast at the same axle speed.

    that being said however, a wheel thats twice the size of another will also mean that the axle will only have to spin half as much to maintain desired vehicle speed, thus increasing fuel economy in constant/static applications (ex. highway driving.) which proportionally results in a loss of stop and go traffic fuel economy.

  • ...any clue on what type of wheels they are?....

  • 90% stock i presume? i'll have numbers for a 11:1 race prep motor in a few weeks....maybe even a video.

  • Are those 17" or 18" rims? Either way I love the look.

  • Biggest limitation to the B Series is the head design. It's crap tbh, not being that great flowing when it came out. But they do go on forever :).

  • That's almost identical to mine. My B did 80 hp and 95 lbs. torque with a side draught.

  • Hey guys this B/GT dyno'd 76rwhp and 94tq when I was videotaping.

  • The rubber bumper ones with the lower horsepower were the bastardised single carb US spec ones with all the emmisions regulations. There is no way a 1.8 inline 4 Morris B series engine with Twin SU carbs would be putting out only 45bhp at the wheels. A stock 1300cc VW Beetle with a single carb does more than that! 95BHP from the back wheels is not beyond the realms of possibility. Putting a performance cam and ported and polished head on often sees 125BHP out of those engines.

  • What Mods does the B have done to it? Nice to see one on a Dyno :).

  • Dyno tests are about more than raw horsepower.

    He's prob getting a Dyno test which checks on the health of your car.

    I know I would ...and will soon. :)

  • so what kind of engine is in that? no point in dynoing a stock b gt as the rear wheel horsepower is like 45 lol

  • actually stock is nearer to 100, with webber carbs possibly a bit more

  • engine flywheel horsepower is like 95 stock mgb motor, but rear wheel horsepower is like 45

  • Whereabouts are you from in the world? I ask as I wonder if it was a rubber bumper model with the Stromberg carb on it which made 65BHP at the flywheel. I would have thought it would be about 70BHP at the wheels to be honest, as there there are not many losses through the drivetrain due to a lack of gizmos like powerful alternators, Air conditioning, power steering etc. for a car with around 100BHP.

  • nice to see the MGBGT still kicking. I owned a white 1971 split bumper one. looking at this made me smile

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more