CNN's Issue # 1: Where Do We Stand on Energy Legislation

[crosbyre]

Thanks for telling the truth. The facts are the facts and I'm happy you're in DC fighting. Once Pelosi and her cohorts get back to DC, keep the pressue on them so they can pass legislation that actually does something.

[GHaydukeLives]

Is that oil dripping out of her nose and ears? Looks like her light bulb campaign didn't work out so well so now she's on to bigger and better things. She should stick to things she knows something about, like licking Bush.

[Auggie56]

I think we ought to have two societies. One where a person chooses if they want to live without petroleum, others with. That would be a real life test, for these who think we can get along without.

[BachmannMonitor]

Michele's lips are moving. She's lying again. Virtually everything Bachmann says here has been discredited by real experts.

[sjamunar]

What experts? MoveOn? Sierra Club? Seriously you libs want to move us back to the stoneage. Frank is wrong. There are no subsidies for oil companies or special tax breaks. If there are, name one. They pay multitudes of taxes. We cannot get off of fossil fuels. Much of what we use uses oil. Don't think we can get off of it and we don't need legislative action to bring alternative energy to use. Thats what the markets are there for. But then again, you socialist liberals dont believe in capitalism

[BachmannMonitor]

What experts do you listen to sjamunar? Michele Bachmann? Here she is with some expertise on the environment:

"(Pelosi) is committed to her global warming fanaticism to the point where she has said that she's just trying to save the planet. We all know that someone did that over 2,000 years ago, they saved the planet -- we didn't need Nancy Pelosi to do that," says Bachmann.