Too bad the fake plane is approaching from the wrong direction. You should have checked which way the smoke was supposed to be travelling before you attempted to make this pathetic sham. This is the worst piece of crap I have seen and I have have seen a lot of crap. PATHETIC. Is witch Ann still paying witches to make fake videos? She paid $1000 8 years ago. What is she paying approaching the 10th year? Btw, hsa anyone noticed how fat & squat the 110 story towers are in this pathetic video?
Plane flies right through the smoke, so it must have obscured the view to the tower prior, but the plane maintained a perfect path into the side of the building... I have no doubts it was a plane, but that was more than a terrorist pilot...
@Skullstation Impossible to tell from this video, being as I work with CGI... and seeing as this is probably a home recording, made by a regular civilian, it'd be hard to blend digital elements into footage that is such poor quality... and with computer power at the time...
@CJCA915 Your working with CGI means absolutely nothing if you are so visually inarticulate that you cannot tell that this is an animation. Download the video and run it frame-by-frame, focus closely on the 'plane'.
@CJCA915 The severe masking as the object hits the building is the main anomaly which cannot be explained by the low-resolution or misaligned keyframes. The second most obvious issue is probably the inconsistencies in the movement of the object, including almost pixel-perfect horizontal sliding of the whole plane between certain pairs of aligned keyframes.
@CJCA915 This is not a valid explanation. A dark object passing in-front of/colliding into another dark object does not create this sort of masking effect, whether it is HD or extremely low-res, it makes no difference.
@RTRVII By 'masking effect', what I meant was, as the 'plane' crashes into the Tower, there is a noticeable gap between the edge of the building and the impacting plane. Even the anti-aliasing, the blurry pixelation along the edge of the building, is preserved as the plane supposedly hits.
@CJCA915 I was definitely over the top with my 'visually inarticulate' comment. My apologies for that. I had a better, more in-depth second look at it before replying to your latest reply/question.
@CJCA915 And what I mean by "almost pixel-perfect horizontal sliding of the whole plane between certain pairs of aligned keyframes" is that parts of the entire object, as a pixelated 'sprite', slide horizontally, right down to certain chunks of the anti-aliasing. At such a low res, with an object moving at that speed, and with the frames manually (mis-)aligned, that's pretty much a smoking gun in my book. In court, this would not be acceptable as video evidence, put it that way.
@CJCA915 I'm guessing you didn't download the video or look at it, thoroughly. That, or you are visually illiterate, after all. I am speaking from observation and you are using vague, dismissive generalizations. Good luck at reaching objective conclusions with such poor researching skills.
@Skullstation I don't need to download it to go frame by frame, I can do that in the video player...
I've looked closely at the point at which the plane transects the edge of the building... I can see the white space that appears between the buildings edge, and the fuselage... I've seen countless videos of the impact, from all angles, all of them have some form of artifacts that make things appear to be there, I did see a rather nice video of the impact, which was really sharp, and clear...
@CJCA915 "I don't need to download it to go frame by frame, I can do that in the video player…"
Although it has been 2 weeks, I feel the need to reply to this while I'm here. There is no feature for frame by frame playback on youtube. You can pause and play in rapid succession, but that is NOT a true frame by frame analysis.
@mrbr549 Like, for a no doubt anxious nervous terrorist, he sure did control that plane like a pro, through smoke and all, in fact, he had to slightly bank at the last second or he would have clipped the tower... only a extremely professional 767 or fighter pilot could have pulled that off, at this speed, and last second... of course, traveling at cruise speed at near sea level is an accomplishment in and of itself, as I'm surprised the stress didn't rip the wings off the plane, as those...
... engines would have been traveling through that air, like trying to pull a bucket underwater as fast as you can through the air, using your hands...
@CJCA915 Yes, it is very suspicious how he could have maneuvered the way he did. There are so many things that don't add up about the whole story though. Thanks for your clarification.
Too bad the fake plane is approaching from the wrong direction. You should have checked which way the smoke was supposed to be travelling before you attempted to make this pathetic sham. This is the worst piece of crap I have seen and I have have seen a lot of crap. PATHETIC. Is witch Ann still paying witches to make fake videos? She paid $1000 8 years ago. What is she paying approaching the 10th year? Btw, hsa anyone noticed how fat & squat the 110 story towers are in this pathetic video?
074August 8 months ago
@074August do you have some sort of mental disability?
aSASa45454 8 months ago
Thanks for the good job stabilizing.
911CTV 8 months ago
Plane flies right through the smoke, so it must have obscured the view to the tower prior, but the plane maintained a perfect path into the side of the building... I have no doubts it was a plane, but that was more than a terrorist pilot...
CJCA915 8 months ago
@CJCA915 It's an animation.
Skullstation 8 months ago
Comment removed
CJCA915 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Skullstation Impossible to tell from this video, being as I work with CGI... and seeing as this is probably a home recording, made by a regular civilian, it'd be hard to blend digital elements into footage that is such poor quality... and with computer power at the time...
CJCA915 8 months ago
@CJCA915 Your working with CGI means absolutely nothing if you are so visually inarticulate that you cannot tell that this is an animation. Download the video and run it frame-by-frame, focus closely on the 'plane'.
Skullstation 8 months ago
@Skullstation What supposedly gives it away to you?
CJCA915 8 months ago
@CJCA915 The severe masking as the object hits the building is the main anomaly which cannot be explained by the low-resolution or misaligned keyframes. The second most obvious issue is probably the inconsistencies in the movement of the object, including almost pixel-perfect horizontal sliding of the whole plane between certain pairs of aligned keyframes.
Skullstation 8 months ago
@Skullstation Well, the masking illusion could be caused by the less than sharp edge on the building... this isn't exactly HD and sharp.
CJCA915 8 months ago
@CJCA915 This is not a valid explanation. A dark object passing in-front of/colliding into another dark object does not create this sort of masking effect, whether it is HD or extremely low-res, it makes no difference.
Skullstation 8 months ago
@Skullstation On the contrary, I've seen the effect before... many years ago, so I can't relay the videos, but I've seen the effect before...
CJCA915 8 months ago
@Skullstation what do you mean with 'masking effect' can you explain that please.
RTRVII 8 months ago
@RTRVII By 'masking effect', what I meant was, as the 'plane' crashes into the Tower, there is a noticeable gap between the edge of the building and the impacting plane. Even the anti-aliasing, the blurry pixelation along the edge of the building, is preserved as the plane supposedly hits.
Skullstation 8 months ago
@CJCA915 I was definitely over the top with my 'visually inarticulate' comment. My apologies for that. I had a better, more in-depth second look at it before replying to your latest reply/question.
Skullstation 8 months ago
@CJCA915 And what I mean by "almost pixel-perfect horizontal sliding of the whole plane between certain pairs of aligned keyframes" is that parts of the entire object, as a pixelated 'sprite', slide horizontally, right down to certain chunks of the anti-aliasing. At such a low res, with an object moving at that speed, and with the frames manually (mis-)aligned, that's pretty much a smoking gun in my book. In court, this would not be acceptable as video evidence, put it that way.
Skullstation 8 months ago
@Skullstation Well, the video is as I said less than HD, it's bound to show artifacts, etc.
I'm not sure if the owner of this camera had auto-focus or focus at all, that would have helped if they'd focused on the buildings... a little better.
CJCA915 8 months ago
@CJCA915 I'm guessing you didn't download the video or look at it, thoroughly. That, or you are visually illiterate, after all. I am speaking from observation and you are using vague, dismissive generalizations. Good luck at reaching objective conclusions with such poor researching skills.
Skullstation 8 months ago
@Skullstation I don't need to download it to go frame by frame, I can do that in the video player...
I've looked closely at the point at which the plane transects the edge of the building... I can see the white space that appears between the buildings edge, and the fuselage... I've seen countless videos of the impact, from all angles, all of them have some form of artifacts that make things appear to be there, I did see a rather nice video of the impact, which was really sharp, and clear...
CJCA915 8 months ago
I can find the video and link you to it...
CJCA915 8 months ago
@CJCA915 "I don't need to download it to go frame by frame, I can do that in the video player…"
Although it has been 2 weeks, I feel the need to reply to this while I'm here. There is no feature for frame by frame playback on youtube. You can pause and play in rapid succession, but that is NOT a true frame by frame analysis.
Skullstation 8 months ago
@Skullstation I know that, but I have a way of looking at something and slowing it down in my head... it's weird.
Anyway, this is an old discussion, I don't feel like getting fired up again.
CJCA915 8 months ago
@CJCA915 "but that was more than a terrorist pilot.." More? In what way?
mrbr549 8 months ago
@mrbr549 Like, for a no doubt anxious nervous terrorist, he sure did control that plane like a pro, through smoke and all, in fact, he had to slightly bank at the last second or he would have clipped the tower... only a extremely professional 767 or fighter pilot could have pulled that off, at this speed, and last second... of course, traveling at cruise speed at near sea level is an accomplishment in and of itself, as I'm surprised the stress didn't rip the wings off the plane, as those...
CJCA915 8 months ago 2
... engines would have been traveling through that air, like trying to pull a bucket underwater as fast as you can through the air, using your hands...
CJCA915 8 months ago
@CJCA915 Yes, it is very suspicious how he could have maneuvered the way he did. There are so many things that don't add up about the whole story though. Thanks for your clarification.
mrbr549 8 months ago 2